HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances 1996 11/20/1995~
~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~
,. ' ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~
1 DEC 2 0 1995 -
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
ORDINANCE NO. 1996 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilman
Jane Hamilton
Seconded by Councilman
Matt Maguire
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 20-205 OF THE ZO1vING ORDINANCE
TO INCREASE THE DISTANCE PERMISSIBLE FOR OFF-SITE PARKING
FACILITIES
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COLJNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. On October 10, 1995 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public
hearing on the proposed amendment to the City of Petaluma Zoning Ordinance.
Section 2. Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the amendment with minor modification to the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance.
Section 3. The City Council finds that the amendment is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section
15061 of the CEQA Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby amends
Ordinance 1072 N.C.S. as follows:
Section 20-205 Alternatives to On-Site Parkin~. The requirements of this section
shall be considered satisfied if the required parking is provided up to six hundred
(600) feet from the site of the use being served, such distance being measured
along the shortest available route of pedestrian access to the primary building
entrance. The determination of the distance to be permitted (0-600') shall be made
by the Planning Director on a case-by-case basis. The Planning Director shall
consider the following in making the determination: type of use being served; ease
of pedestrian access from the off-site location to the site being served;
characteristics of the off-site parking facility(s); potential adverse effects that
reduced on-site parking may present to the immediate area; term of off-site
rentaUlease arrangements. This alternative does not apply to residential parking.
Ord. 1996 NCS 1 of 2 Qages
. ~
IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is for
any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council
of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this
ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more
of said provisions be declared unconstitutional.
1
2
3
4
5
INTRODUCED and ordered Posted/Published this 6th day of November
199 5.
ADOPTED this 20th day of November , 199 5, by the following vote:
AYES: Hamilton, Stompe, Read, Vice Mayor Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: Maguire, Barlas
ABSTAIN: None
~--~'~~ ~ ' ~
ayor
ATTEST:
~ ~~%~~~iK '~ -
City er
ccpkgord/jm6
6
7
8
9
lo
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
2
Ord. 1996 NCS
~q . a. c~ ~..