HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances 1936 09/07/1993t'1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
~~~~ ~~~'
~~~~~
~cf 71993 t
ORDINANCE NO. 1936 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilmember
Vice Mayor Read
Seconded by Councilmember
Lori Shea
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AMENDING ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. AS AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND
REZONING ELEVEN PARCELS LOCATED AT 205, 207, 209 E STREET; 300, 304,
622 SECOND STREET; 505, 509, 513, 517 PETALUMA BOULEVARD SOUTH; AND
611 PETALUMA BOULEVARD SOUTH (ALSO LISTED AS 610 SECOND STREET)
FROM C-H, COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY TO R-W, RIVERFRONT WAREHOUSE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS:
26 Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City
27 Council on August 16, 1993, its report set forth in its minutes of July 27th (File REZ93004)
28 recommending the adoption of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance 1072 N.C.S., as
29 amended, by reclassifying and rezoning certain lands being more particularly described as
30 Assessor's Parcel Numbers 008-125-001, 002, 003, 004, 010; 008-193-005, 007, 009, 011; 008-
31 194-009, 011.
32
33 Section Z. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held a public
34 hearing on said proposed amendment on July 27, 1993, after giving notice of said hearing in
35 the manner, and for the period, and in the form required by Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as
36 amended.
37
38 Section 3. The City Council further finds that the project is exempt from processing under
39 the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15D61(b)(3) of the
40 CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
41 project will have a significant effect on the environment, and no further environmental
42 review is necessary.
43
44 Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended
45 the City Council finds as follows:
1
Ord. 1936 NCS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3.1
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
1. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Mixed Use and Thoroughfare
Commercial General Plan land use designations and with the policies of the
General Plan encouraging rehabilitation and preservation of existing "non-
conforming" housing.
2. Public necessity, convenience and general welfare of the City of Petaluma clearly
permit the adoption of the proposed amendment.
3. The project is exempt from processing under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because it
can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is for
any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of
the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this ordinance
and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more of said
provisions be declared unconstitutional.
INTRODUCED and ordered Posted this 16th day of August, 1993.
ADOPTED this 7th day of September , 19 93 , by the following vote:
AYES: Nelson, Sobel, Hamilton, Barlas, Shea, Vice Mayor Read, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
i er
rword/dd7
Ord. 1936 NCS
2