HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 04/16/2001 (13) CITY.OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA '
AGENDA BILL
Agenda Title: Meeting,Date: April 16, 2001
McDowell Boulevard/E. Washington Street Intersection
Transportation Improvement Project (Project No. 9863, Ph3):
Consideration of adoption'of the resolution of necessity to acquire
property by eminent domain; Property Assessor's Parcel No.
/Address is: 007-340-006/101 North McDowell Boulevard (Maria
Novak and.Martha Thorup)
Department: Director: Contact Person: Phone Number:
Public Facilities and Rick Skladzien Mike Evert 778-4439
Services c_—
Cost of Proposal: Account Number:
$189,000 ,213-9863
Name of Fund:
Amount Budgeted: (Amount budgeted in 5-Year CIP for Alter. 1) PCDC
PCDC 1,300,000 Special Assessment
Special.Assessment 988,000, Traffic Mitigation Fee
Traffic Mitigation Fee 2.387.000
$4,675,000
• Attachments to Agenda.Packet Item:
Agenda Report
Letter to property owner, notice of intention to adopt resolution of necessity, and property descriptions.
Exhibit C - Map of intersection improvements for Alternative 1.
• l Exhibit D- Map of project Alternatives 1, B-1, and C.
Exhibit E- Project schedule from design engineer.
Exhibit F - Copy of the City Council Agenda Bill and Report of February 20, 2000 (w/o attachments).
' Exhibit G - Project mailing list of interested parties.
Exhibit H—Copies of Intersection landscape, sidewalk, and crosswalk treatments.
Resolution of Necessity to acquire property by eminent domain, with exhibits A and B.
Summary Statement:
At the December 4, 2000 City Council,meeting; City personnel stated that they would be back to the
Council this 'spring with a recommendation to proceed with eminent: domain proceedings in order to
obtain the necessary right-of-way for the McDowell/E. Washington St. Transportation Improvement
Project. .
In order to insure that the contractor can start construction on this project in June 2001, the City
Attorney's office needs; to take any and all steps necessary to obtain the necessary rights of way for •
,construction, including steps to be in a position to initiate eminent domain and, if necessary, to initiate
I said procedures as soon as possible.
One of the steps to initiate eminent domain proceedings is for the Council to first adopt the resolution of
necessity. The Council is, therefore, asked to consider the adoption of resolution of necessity for
property located at Assessor's Parcel No./Address: 007-340-006/101 North McDowell Boulevard (Maria
• Novak and Martha Thorup). •
Council Priority: THIS.AGENDA ITEM Is CONSIDERED To BE PART OE, OR NECESSARY To, ONE OR. it
MORE OF THE.1999-2000 PRIORITIES ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 30, 1999
AND MARCH 18, 2000.
Priority(s) Regional Transportation Plan, and the Bicycle Plan.
Recommended City Council Action/Suggested Motion:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution of necessity.
Reviewed by Finance Director: Reviewed by City.Attorney: Approved by City Manager:
C,( �, �� IDte: Ifb l Date: '1 ate:, '-(-5-01
1I�J II.
Today's Date: Revision# and Date Revised: File Code:.
4/2/01 # . Eminent Domain for 4-02-01 CC
mtg./pf&s staff folder
me/s/McDowell/Agendas
•
I
•
2
•
• CITY OF PETALUMA, 'CALIFORNIA
• Arkii,16, 2001
AGENDA REPORT
FOR
THE MCDOWELL BOULEVARD/E. WASHINGTON•STREET INTERSECTION
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT No. 9863, PH. #3)
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the December 4,2000 City Council meeting, City personnel stated that they would be
back to the Council this spring with a recommendation to proceed with eminent domain
proceedings in order to obtain the necessary right-of-way for the McDowell/E.
Washington:St. Transportation Improvement Project.
In order to insure that the contractor can start construction on this project in June 2001,
the City Attorney's office needs to take any and all steps necessary to obtain the
necessary rights of way for construction, including,steps to be in a position to initiate
eminent domain and, if necessary, to initiate said procedures as soon as possible.
One of the steps to initiate eminent domain proceedings is for the Council to first adopt
the resolution of necessity. The Council is, therefore, asked to consider the adoption of
resolution of necessity fori property located at Assessor's Parcel No./Address: 007-340-
006/101 North McDowell Boulevard(Maria Novak and Martha Thorup).
2. BACKGROUND:
The McDowell BlvdJE, Washington St. Intersection'Transportation Improvement Project
is composed of three alternatives-that were chosen by the City Council on October 4,
1999. Alternative 1 includes transportation improvements in the area of the intersection
(see Exhibit C), Alternative-B-1 includes bicycle and pedestrian improvements over
Highway 101 from the northbound off-ramp of Highway 101 to Ellis Street on the west,
and Alternative C is being studied for 5' bicycle lanes on both sides of E. Washington St.
from McDowell Blvd. to Adobe Road on the east (see Exhibit D). The project has
continued to use Alternatives 1, B-1, and C for identifying the specific improvements
because each Alternative has its own funding, design, and construction scheduling issues.
The City Council directed City personnel to complete the contract documents to construct
the Alternative 1 intersection improvements in2001(see Exhibit C). Alternative B-1 and
C are scheduled for construction in 2002 because•these Alternatives have Federal funds.
5 The Federal funds require an NEPA environmental document, which could take
approximately 18 months to complete and approve. •
1
As part of the McDowell/E. Washington St. Transportation Improvement Project, the
City has been proceeding in acquiring the fee titles and easements needed to do the
improvements. These acquisitions are mainly small strips of property along McDowell
Boulevard. In all,eight fee titles and twelve easements are required frorn eight property
owners. The one structure that is affected by the right-of way acquisition is-the
elimination of two of the eight gasoline pumps at the Beacon ServiceStation.
Geoff Hornsby, the,City's right-of-way consultant,has submitted the offers to the
property owners, and is continuing to negotiate with the owners for the fee titles and
temporary easements. However, in order to insure that the contractor can start work in
June 2001, staff is recommending that the Council adopt the resolutions of necessity
authorizing the City Attorney,or his designee, to file eminent domain lawsuits to obtain
orders for the right of entry to construct the City's project. The orders will permit the.
contractor to:start work on schedule.
Through,eminent domain proceedings, a public agency can, through a court hearing,
obtain immediate possession of+propertyin order to perform a public,project. Once
immediate possession is granted by the courts, funds to purchase the properties are filed
with the courts, and the public project proceeds. This procedure allows time for the.
property owner and the City's right-of-way consultant (eminent domain appraiser), or the
courts, to arrive at an agreement'to finalize the purchase of needed property.
Mr. Hornsby will continue to negotiate with the owners of the properties. Each of the •
owners was advised by letter, copies of which are attached, that the City would continue
to negotiate with them even if a resolution of necessity is adopted. Government Code
Section 7267.2'requires the City to submit written offers to the property owners: The
offers must set forth the basis for the City's offer and the factual data supporting,the
offer. A 2/3 vote (5 Councilmembers) is required to adopt a resolution of necessity.
Project Schedule:
Several key project tasks such as design, right-of-way acquisition, environmental review,
assessment district formation,and utility relocation coordination are,being tracked
simultaneously in order to meet the City Council's goal of constructing the intersection
transportation improvements in Alternative 1, in the summer of 2001. The bicycle and
pedestrian improvements in Alternatives"B-1-.and C are scheduled for 2002 in order to
complete the environmental documents necessary`for securing Federal funds: The
schedule for the:;two`phases oftheimprovements is shown on Exhibit E. 'Right-of-way
acquisition continues to ba the key issue in the schedule.
3. ALTERNATIVES:
a: Adopt a resolution,of necessity
•
2
•
b. Do not adopt.a resolution of necessity and let•the,right-ofway consultant complete
the right-of-way negotiations. This alternative would not,insure that the needed right-
of-way will be available by June 2001: Lack of right-of-Way will delay the project
and result in claims from the.contractor.
c.. Other combinations or options resulting fromthe discussion by the City Council.
4. FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Right-of-way cost
The estimated cost for right-of-way acquisition was estimated in 1999 as $312,000. In
October 2000; during the preparation of the assessment district feasibility study, the
estimated cost for right-of-way was`increased to $803,000. This increase was to take into
account the cost of purchasing property and easements from the Beacon Service Station.
The purchase of one.fee`simple and three temporary construction easements from the
Beacon Station will enable•thetcontractor to construct the improvements without blocking
the travel lanes. The acquisition of the fee take will eliminate two of the station's eight
gas pumps. Their removal has`.long been anticipated by the owner of the station, and is
included in the Beacon Station offer of$189,000. This breaks down into $85,000 for one
fee take, $36,000 for three'temporary construction easements, and $68,000 in severance
damage. At this time, the,estimated cost to purchase all of the right-of-way for this
• project, including the Beacon.Station site, is $660,000.
Total project cost estimate
The•project's cost estimatefor Alternate 1 intersection improvements was revised on
September 5, 2000 by$704,000 (for Alternate 1)to include the Landscape Conceptual
Design A.improvements-for-$335,000, the special concrete paver crosswalks for
$134,000,.and to include replacing the approach lanes on East Washington St. and
McDowellBlvd. So. with concrete instead of asphalt,for-an added cost of$235,000.
These additions were approved by the City Council on.December 4, 2000. It is proposed
that the Traffic Mitigation Fund, PCDC, and an assessment district fund these
improvements.
The estimated cost for the bicycle.and pedestrian improvements in Alternative B-1
(bicycle and pedestrian improvements over Highway 101) is $394;000.
The estimated cost for the bicycle and pedestrian improvements in Alternative C
(McDowell Blvd. to Adobe•Rd.);-is$3,046,000.•The high cost is because of the cost of
the improvements along Washington Creek from McDowell Blvd. to Sonoma Mountain
Parkway. .
An alternative of installing 5=foot wide bike lanes,omboth sides of E. Washington St.
• from McDowell Blvd. to Sonoma Mountain Parkway (Alternate C) is to turn Lauren
•
3
•
Drive into a bike.boulevard. This would reduce the cost of Alternate C and is explained
in more detail at the end of this section.
Estimated costs for Alternative 1 improvements atthe.intersection:
The plans and contract documents for these•improvements are complete and the project
went out to bid on March 6,,2001. On March 29,2001, two bids were received. The low
bid was $3,384,863.00. Three,project cost estimates are noted below: The,cost estimate
shown,below and on the left is the cost estimate as used in the Assessment District
Feasibility Study, and in the Final Engineer's Report. The Design Engineer's estimate as
of March 1, 2001 is shown in the center. The project cost, as based on the,low bid, is
shown on the right;
Estimated cost for
Alternate 1 intersection Design Engineer's Estimated cost
improvements,.as used estimated cost for for
in the Assessment Alternate 1 Alternative
District Feasibility intersection based on bids
Study and in"the Final. improvements at bid received on
Engineer's Report time 3-29-01
General Fund Overhead: 0. $31•7,000.(3)
Construction Management/
Inspection .$435;000. $470,000.(1) •463,000..(4)
Planning/Design 435;000. 460,000.(1) 477,000`(5)
Land Acquisition • 803;000, 710,000. 803,000.(6)
Improvements 2,022;000, 2;813,000.(2) 3,471,000.(7)
Contingency 421,000. 421,000>. 421,000.
Estimated Cost $4,116;000. • $4,874,000. $5;952,000.
1) Inspection and design costs were,increased to oversee the water main installation and
added street reconstruction.
2) The improvement costs were increased:
• By $351,000 to replace the water main system within the intersection prior to the
roadway being replaced.
• To reconstruct:an additional 300 feet.of So McDowell Blvd from the end of the
concrete pavement to McNeill Ave, It has been:determined that because of the
poor condition of this section of roadway that'if it is not replaced now it will
totally fall apart when the intersection is reconstructed.
• To include No McDowell Blvd. as a section of roadway to receive a:concrete
surface for 75 feet from the intersection. Like the other three,legs:of the
intersection, the concrete roadway surface will protect the traffic loops for a far •
longer period of time than an asphalt surface.
4
3) General Fund overhead is a new charge to Capital Projects to cover City overhead.
., 4) Cost for project;management and:inspection, materials testing and construction staking.
The cost includes night-time inspection of the roadway improvements, water main
installation, and signal light installation.
5) Cost includes $44,000,for preliminary design of the bicycle improvements alternates B-1
and C. Design work for these alternatives is on hold.
6) The right-of-way budget includes a$100.000 contingency for negotiations.
7) 'Includes the construction bid.of$4,385,000, compensation to the Beacon Service Station
of$50,000 for use of the site for three months, and $36,000 to the Petaluma Best Western
Inn.
Recommended:funded sources6for Alternative 1 improvetnents'at the intersection based
on bids (low bid of$3385;000) received on 3-29-01:
PCDC $1,300,000:
Special Assessments 988,000.
• Water Fund 351,000.
• Traffic Mitigation Fund 3,313900.
Total recommended project funding $5,952,000.
• Total estimated cost and proposed funding sources for,all-Alternates 1 (construction in
2001). 13-1, and C (construction in 2002) when using the:design engineer's cost estimate
of March 1,2001 is as follows:
Uses:
General Fund Overhead $489,000.
Const. Managentent:/Inspection $983,000.
Planning/Design 870,000.
Land Acquisition 843,000.
Improvements 5,356,000.
Contingency 977,000.
Total Cost $9,518,000(Design Engineer's project cost estimate).
•Potential.Funding Sources:
PCDC $1,300,000.
Special Assessments 988,000.
Water Fund 351,000.
Traffic Mitigation Fees 3,305,000 .
TEA-21 &'TDA Funds 1,050,000
Safe Routes to School Grant 500,000
Undetermined Funds 2,024,000(8)
• Total funding $9,518,000
5
8) This shortfall in funding will affect the bicycle;and pedestrian improvements in I
Alternatives B=1 and C, scheduled for construction in 2002. An;alternative of
installing 5-foot wide bike lanes on both sides of E. Washington St. from McDowell
Blvd. to Sonoma Mountain Parkway(Alternate C) is to turn Lauren,Drive into'a bike
boulevard. This would reduce the cost of Alternate C from $3,046,000 to $2,292,000
(a reduction in cost of approximately'$754,000).
5. CONCLUSION:
•
In order to proceed with eminent domain'proceedings`to obtain the necessary property
interests to insure that construction can'start in June 2001, it is necessary-for the Council
to adopt the resolution of necessity.
6. OUTCOMES'OR PERFORMANCE.MEASUREMENTS TIIAT WILL IDENTIFYISUCCESS OR.
COMPLETION:.
Startrnconstruction of the intersection transportation improvements for Alternative I in the
summer of 2001.
•
7. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution of necessity. •
Eminent Domain for 4-2-01 CC Mtg./s.pf&s:folder/me/MO.Dowell/Agenda
•
6
•
Oyti x 9 CITY OF PETALUMA
POST OFFICE Box 61
850 PETALUMA, CA 94953=0061
E.Clark Thompson
Mayor
Janice Cader-Thompson
Michael Healy .
Matt Maguire
Bryant Moynihan
Mike O'Brien •
Pamela Torliatt
Councilmembers
March 12,2001
BY CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
John King, Sr.
c/o Olmstead Realty •
Public Facilities&Services
587 Lakeville St.
22 Bassett Street Petaluma, CA.94952 •
Petaluma, CA 94952
one(707)778-4303 Re: McDowell/E. Washington Street Transportation Improvement Project
Fax(707) 7784437 #9863.
E-Merit: pubfaeilittes@
cr.petaluma,cans Eminent Domain Proceedings for the Beacon Service Station at 101
No. McDowell Blvd., APN 007-340-006.. •
Animal Services.
840 Hopper St Ext. Dear Mr. King:
Petaluma,CA.94952 g
Phone(707) 778-4396
As you may know,,the City;of Petaluma isscheduled to construct
Corporation.Yard improvements at.the McDowell/E. Washington Street-Intersection.
e40Hoppersl.Ext Advertising or construction bids is scheduled for March with construction
Petaluma, CA 94952 g �
Phone(707) 778-4303 starting in June, 2001..
Fax(707) 778-4437
The City's right of way consultant has-submitted compensation offers to you
Petaluma Municipal Airport f
601 Sky Ranch'Dr
or the purchase of the required property or easements for the improvements,
rve
Petaluma, CA.94954 and it is the City's desire that it purchase the required property through
PhFone ax(70(7077)) 778 778--44045 aos negotiations rather than litigation.' However, in order to start construction in
June, the City must obtain the right to enter on your property for construction
Traffic/Transportation purposes.
22 Bassett St.
Petaluma, CA 94952 The right to-enter our property is usually granted to the Cit b an order of
Phone(707) 778-4303 5" Y P P Y Y�' Y. Y
Fax(707) 778-4437 . possession issued to the City when it files an eminent domain action. The
enclosed Notice of Intention is to advise you that the Petaluma City Council
Transit will on April 2, 2001, at 3 p.m., consider the adoption of a Resolution of
II English Street
Petaluma,CA 94952
Phone(707) 778-4421 -
I Fax(707) 778-4419
ra c,.,,on recycled c.w,
upon in-a timely.manner: If you•haye any questions, please do not hesitate'to
call the City's right-of-way consultant, Geoff Hornsby (707/575-7778) or me.
Very truly yours,
Michael Evert, P.E.
Engineering Manager
Attachments:
•
Notice of Intention to Adopt Resolution of Necessity
Exhibits of fee and easement.acquisitions
cc: Mike Nave,.Attorney for.Ciiy.:of:Petaluma
Geoff Hornsby;City-right-of-way agent
All Salkhi
Stanley Felix/Joseph Felix Realty Co.
Nancy Casa],do Cooper„White&CooperLLP
Maria I.Novak
Darlene Kehoe CPA.
Beacon emin..domain notice fora-5-o I CC .
•
•
•
•
•
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO
ADOPT RESOIUTION OF NECESSITY
CITY OF PETALUMA
McDOWELL BOULEVARD/E. WASHINGTON STREET
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 9863
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN;pursuant to California Code Civil Procedure Section
1245.235 that it is the intent of,the,CityCouncil of the City of Petaluma to adopt a Resolution of
Necessity under Article2 (commencing with Section 1245.210) of Chapter 4 of Title 7 of Part 3
of the Code of Civil Procedure°of the State of California and directing the filing of eminent
domain proceedings for the acquisition of certain real property, hereinafter described, in
connection with the above-captioned project.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that on the 2nd day of April, 2001, at the hour of 3:00
P.M., in the regular meeting place of the City Council of the City of Petaluma, 11 English Street,
' Petaluma, California, at the time and place appointed and fixed.bysaid City Council when and
where it will hear all protests-in relation;to the adoption of said Resolution of Necessity and
authorizing the filing of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of fee simple and/or
' temporary construction easements more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and by this reference incorporated herein. The fee simple and/or temporary construction
it easements are to be acquired in order to construct McDowell Boulevard/E. Washington Street
Transportation Improvement Project 9863.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may file a written request to appear
and be heard with-the Clerk<ofthe City of Petaluma within fifteen(15) days after the mailing of
this notice (mailing address: Clerk of the City of Petaluma, 11.English.Street, Petaluma,
California 94953). Any interested.person who files such a timely request has the right to appear
and be heard at the tithe and place statedherein on the matters referred to in Section 1240.030 of
said Code of Civil Procedure, to wit:
(a) Whether the public interest;and necessity require the project;
(b) Whether said project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with
the greatest public good and the least private injury;
(c) Whether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for said project and
(d) Whether the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the.
owner(s) of record.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the failure to file,such a written request to appear and be
heard within fifteen (15) days after the mailing of this Notice will result in waiver of the right to
appear and be heard.
Dated: March 12, 2001 CITY OF PETALUMA
•
1
Richard Skladz rre+c`,r
Public Facilities & Services
4-2 Notice of.Intent to adopt resol/s/pf&s/rncdwllhvash/r-of-w
•
•
•
•'
OWNERS MARIA NOVAK AND MARTHA THORUP
PROPERTY #8
Property No- 3 (R/W)
°IN 07-340-006
• Date: May 15, 2000
EXHIBIT."A"%
All that certain real.property situate in the City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma, State of California.
described as:foilows:
A portion of Parcel 3,as shown upon that certain map entitled,"Parcel Map No.6,"recorded in Book
109 of Maps at Page 15, Sonoma County Records,more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most Easterly comer of said Parcel3,being apoint on the Southwesterly line of
McDowell Boulevard as shown on said map;
thence leaving said McDowell Boulevard along the Southeasterly-line of said Parcel3,South 36'05'30"
West, 15.00 feet;
thence leaving said Southeasterly line, North 54°31130" West, 152.33 feet;
thence North 52°09'36" West, 7.17 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Parcel 3:
IDthence along.saidNorthwester iy line,North 36°0530"East l4.70 feet to the most northerly corner of said
Parcel 3, being a point on said Southwesterly line of McDowell Boulevard:
thence along said Southwesterly line ofMcDowellBoulevard,South 54°31130'East, 160.00 feet to the
PONT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2.393.46 feet. more or less.
F. 4.?,:•W'oOCOCCU'Da c J-11+:01500
\--... L_____ 1
McDOWELL BLVD.
0
EXISTING R1GNT OF WAY AREA = 2;398.46 .S'F.
'Walk lik ."b A 1 — —
i N54'31'30'W' 152'83`
F-
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY U'
°o l w
N 52'09'36" W I°
7.1 ' �-
N ,v I V)
_ e
M u, z
W ° °c W C.•
o - 1 r 3 I C
:
H-
r: K Og FG. iS Z t3
co L `Io I z
ZI Iz Z I •
— — 160.00' V Uj N54'31'30"W I
Cl)
I u
PARCrr i , 1
BK. 109 PG. Jf5
EXHIBIT "B" Property No. a
{� f A.P. No 0.7-340-006
CSW SCALE: 1"
CSW/STUBER:—S iROEH 01"/22/01 10:40 JOE '-'4.06002 re
[ St] 2 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC:. McDOWELL BLVD/E. WASHINGTON
CONSULTING ENC NELRS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
790 D"eLong Ave., Novato, CA. 94945 3240 R/VV ACQUISITION
(415) 892-4763 FAX (415) 892-4502
02000 PET,4.LUMA SONOMA COUNTY CALIFORNIA.
?6062\ NiarSA,\EEECONROy(
Property No. 3 (TCE)
APN 07-340-006
• Date: May 15, 2000 •
EXHIBIT r`lA"
•
All that certain real property situate in the City ofPetaluma,County of Sonoma, State of California.
described as follows:
•
Pordons ofParcel3 as shown upon that certain map entitled,"Parcel Map No.6,"recorded in Book 109
of Maps at Page I5, Sonoma County Records, more particularly described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
A Temporary Consttucnon Easeme225 00 feet in width,measured at right angles,lying adjacent to and
Northwesterly ofthe Southeastedy.line ofthe said Parcel 3,excepting therefrom the Northeasterly 15.00
feet thereof.
Containing 2,750 square feet, more or less.
PARCEL 2:
® A Temporary Con suttcaon Easement 5.00 feet hi width,measured ai right angles,lying adjacent to and
Southwesterly of the following described lines:
BEGllThT\TQatapointwhjcheNopJi 5403 130!East,25.00 feet andSouth36'05'30"Jest. 15.00
feet from the most Easterly comerofParcel 3 as shown upon that certam mapentitled,"ParcelMan'No.
6,"recorded in Book 109 of Mans at•Page 15, Sonoma County Records;
thence North 54°31'30" Nest. 127:33 feet;
thence Noah 52°09'36" Nest, 7:17 feet to apoint on the Northwesterly line of said Parcel 3 and the
terminus of the herein described Easement.
Containing 675 square feet, more or less.
Said Temporary Conssuction Easements shall te rminme upon the filing ofaCe:; carreofCompletionw with
the Sonoma County Recorder forthe McDowell Blvd./E.Washington Sc.Intersection Transportation
•
•
Improvements Project, Project No. 9863. Phase III.
it
F^Ad-i rnV;?5o"000∎4 1¢cc15.CC;Syo
___ _ L___. _ _ , _
' •
y McDOWELL BLVD,:
— _ EXISTING. RIGHT OF WAY
AREA=2,398.46 S.F.
14.70 15 1 25'II
N5d31 0°W• 12783'
i
I PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY P08 :+ Li!
1 N 5709'35 W 7.47' 1 1•
PARCEL 2
e TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT }w I
,
w M6 AREA=675 S.F. fr.:':: :.:.':.: : ? W' Z
o - 1 .9. U
�
^ PARCEL S I
I EX. 1O9 PG. J f. . 2v' `� Q z Z
�°�' I
21 PARCEL 1 : .I H
TEMP. CONST., EASEMENT. 1 Z I VI •
kil_. Z:
AREA=2 750 S.F.
_ _ 160:00' — i. .. :: ; V]
I-
N 54';31'30" W 1 C (n
�
•I u
PAR r471 I I
Si-k. '109 FG. 5
.
EAHbB1. "B" Property No. .3,
. A.P. No. '07-340-006
CS SCALE: 1"=40' .
CSW. STU,BER—STROEH #4.96002 •
/ 01/22/6
11:18 OE i#
IS't1 2" ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. MCDOWELL BLVDJE WASHINGTON.
CONSULTING ENGINE=RS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
• 790 D=Long Ave., Novcto, CA. 94945-32'45 , TEMP. CONST. EAS.EMEN�.i •
(415) 892-4753 FAX (415) 892-4502'. •
0 2000, PETALUMA SONOMA COUNTY CALIFORNIA.
•
19.6002\7?ir";:c_c:_cirC..v__,c-
Date: January 4, 2001
File: 4.960.02
Property No. 8 (TCE)
APN 07-340=006
EXHIBIT "A"
' PARCEL 2A:
A temporary construction easement,being aportion ofParcel'No.3,as shown upon that certain map
entitled"Parcel Map No. 6",recorded in Book 109 of Maps at Page 1'5, Sonoma County Records,
more particularly described as follows::
COMMENCING at the most easterlycomerzo1Parcel No. 3, as shown on said map;
thence along the most northeasterly line.North,54°31'30" East 25.00 feet;
thence South 36°05'30" West20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
thence South 36°05'30" West 26.00 feet;
thence North 54°31'30" West t135 43 feet to the most westerly line of Parcel No. 3;
thence along said westerly line North 36°05:30" East 26.06 feet;
thence South 52°09'36" East 7.12 feet;
thence South 54°31'30"East.128.31 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 3,522 square feet more or less.
i
•
E'Ad.PttIWP6O nDac101-09-01.960
Mc'DOWELL BLVD. •
0
FARCE!' .ZQ o
■
TEMP. CONS;T, E4SE.
EXISTING R/W AREA 3,522 'S.F:
_ _ _ - �_ .N ,54'31'30" W _
PROPOSED R/W u-3iN' 25''\ -
i P:07C. •
S 52'09'36" E
C a o - P.O.B.7.12 o fo. , ,
i I-
o
I� u
w MERIAN CONC. POST, 3 I—
a. ISLAND, iYP• TYP: OF 4 i"Y l 9 U , C")
olo
I p`° ° P RC I O OI
z I
•
• BK. J09 PG. 15 I n ~ II 15 •
• V _ _ - z •
160.00' • I I _..)-11
) in
N 54'34'30" W I < Q
•
i
I J ,
f �'
r7C I N
�r�T1v _,, �
SK IO9 PG. -I- • w
•
I . I
EXHIBIT "B" Property Nc. 8
A.P. -,No. 07-340-008
CSW SCALE: 1"=40`
CSW/STUBER—STROEH 12/29/00 15:50 JOB #4.96002 •
[ St] 2 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. McDOWELL BLVDJE WASHINGTON
CONSUL nNC ENG N ; s INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
790, DeLong Ave., Novato, CA. 94945-3246 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT
(415) 892-4763 FAX (415) 892-4502
o z000 PETALUMA SONOMA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
•
ELI1J � II � o /7 _ ✓�
OVAK D NE NOVAK c \�.
6 2 ALTERNATE C
t1 '-cc
sy1 z WASHINGTON SQUARE
S t* : SjTOPPING CENTER
JE rF'2i EY DRIVE - -
— I I. ALTERRAT.E 1
w
MCDOWELL BLVD. NORTH:SS MCDOWELL BLVD. SOUTH
a
I - .
i'�� [� I i CORiEZ ORNE
PLAZA z= z
SHOPPING CENTER ��
',h W / \ �� CCRONIOO ORNE
/ \\1 ���..///
1iI N
'E) ‘11111.111111111
O
ii A !i-
- smART
1
1 Li
/' - ALTERNATE 8-1 •
ARLINGTON NNE 1.,. ,
1 ® r kENILWORTH ,
1 1 1 i JUNIOR
l. ._ - I ) �1 HIG' HI SCHOOL
. I II • I URL N I ONI OR
1 1 i s I /i E KP I & ) T C
C.0 W i SCALE: 1"=300'
JULY 2000 J06 1 4.96002
•
CSW/STUEER—STROEH ���.
[ st] 2 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. McDOW€LL BLVDJE WASHINGTON CONSULTING ENGINEERS
790 DeLong Ave., Novato, CA. 94945-3246 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
(415) 892-4763 FAX (415) 892-4502
0 1999 PETALUMA SONOMA. CO. CALIFORNIA
496CO2\ENGLISH\VICINITY
?5,1:KARON)
A 1.. ,
SANTA\
Px\
RCHNERT . •--
t•CI
PARX
r, ( 0
2 . NAPA
1 - ..-.• ":"...' a
• I.: ..:T1" Iti, ..t., al
•
. .1:"•:-. le • ' ci ..
T\---------
• ••.• .......::,
. •••':••:,- f
i
s •11 ' ....C:::*::::4116
. --t-'..---
.... INA .
....._ /
,
NORTH ••• •• - •••int• 3 : . g..\\
- , •
. ' `7[7-L(•1- __EL- • •Frowasol
•. ...,...". - :-•
:Pill .
c ,
3 .._,---U0------c
<
VICINITY MAP
U .(IF
E5 "3, -
ligi
1--
.__La
<
SONOMAHMTN . • ; : Ao C
PARKWAY:- . a —
01 •
•
A I ii.. Mill
•
Lt•- —
. •
, .
SCIC.I .,06L McDOWELL BLVD SCALE:, 1' =1200
NORTH JULY 2000 /- . JOB #,' 49.600Z
-7/2.-..5 • - -—
.
: SHOPRIPKI CUM; I • McDOWELLBLVDJE. WASHINGTON
T ,—
ccITC ' 7 ROUTE 10. /... • • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
. 5 a. _______-. —r---
PROJEC T No. 9863
,
l .
'PETALUMA SONOMA CO'. CALIFORNIA_ -
a ,, z-,,-;
cc 0 LI L•
Hg hig icy. , C S1AT
zc', • <I , - ../ .
101011A - ISA:RIN n CSW/STUBER—STROEH . a
F-AIROA-0 U'N 0,5 [ S t] C ENGINEERING' GROUP, INC. Hwy
Ell - I . M • -
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
• . i a i r-
790 'Del.:prig Ave,, Novato, CA. 94945-3246
LOCATION MAP . (415) 592.-4763 FAX (45 5) 892-4502
496002\ENGLISH\VICINITY1
•
Schedule E.2
McDowell E.cDoell Blvd ,/ Washington. 5f t Intersection Improvements
INotes 1Tese Name 1 Duration i Stan 1 Fssm. 04 1 0 1 1 102SPC] 04 1 01 C2'1 A
I 4 I c, ' ,0,'02 1 0 3 /C4 II
PHASE 1.INTERSECTION WIDENING 782 days 'Th../.12/"3/913 Fri 11/720/01_ -I'
1 I PLANNING/CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 0 days Fn 21599 Fri 21599 _
�:�+ 219
, - 1:1 Agreement 47 days 1w 12/2198 Fn 215/9 I"'+ -
1.2 Traffic Counts 13 days Psi 12/3/98 Mon 122/2198 Ur
9 2days Wei T1u 214199 . .
1.3 Kick-off Meeting ..-.�L.:... ....._ .I:..... • i..
' 14 Researal 21.days Mon 21199 Mon 2/199
•1:5 Feasoiery Studies n days Tue l)2/SO Tut 4/2199 1-1
J
Is Aerial Topo 3 Schematic Plans 82 days Mon 111/99 Mal 931199 ;FF��^^'^ll��{{1
1.7 Atemadvm Analysis 21 days Men 472699 Mal 52499 3 1
1.8 Rough Cost Estimate 21 days IM 42599 Mal 52499 (^
1.9 Cary Start Review 8 Comment 24 days Tuv&1N9 Fn 7299 ('U
•
1.10 Properly Owner Meetings 21 days Mon 7/5/99 Man 6.299
•
1.11 I City Cmmcil Stator Report 0 days Mal 101499 Man 10/499 _ *i;wl - •
II DESIGN PHASE 0 days Mon 11/1/99 Mon 11/1199 4 1
1111
.. _ . J .: ... ... .. • ..:
21 I Pream_Tinal Plans,Seen.S Esun. 253 days Mon 11/199 Wed 11/1KM
•
22 Mitigated Negawe Declaration 176 days Mon 11100 Fn 2201 } ,3
2.3 Assessment District Study 55 clays Man 6/5/c0 Fn&1/00
2.4 Propery Owners Meetings 46 days Wed 7/19/00 Wed 2/20/00 a;•
ill
2.5 Ctry Cdund Slaws Report Oaays 'Mal 10rl/W. Man 102LO.... ... ...:... 0
2.6 90%Review d Comment ']dap WedAt/1100' Fn 1'2/1/00 ::
•
2.7 I RNJ Acquisition 198 days wed 22/1/00 Fri 12/1/00 I ..I
2.8 Assessment Dist.Estee.(See Esnldit A) 46 days Mon 10290. Man 1214!00 ittt. 7 -
2.9 Bid Process 24 days Mon 11&01 Thu 2/6101 C {^,F7
2.10 City Council Memo Cue '0 days Mon 2119101 . Mon 22/19/01
.. f*.7119 •
2.11 City- Council Award of Contract 0 days Mon 2/19/01 Mon 2119/01 * 119 •
. ::
2.12 Assessment Oiswcl Sands Issued 0 days Man 4/'0/01 Mon 400101 r -
_...!._ ...�_.......:..... 4 -,:o ...
2.13 Notice to Proceed 0 days Mon fill Men 5R/01
III CONSTRUCTION 132 days Fn 6/1/01 M (9
on 1201( _ t
: I PHASE 2-BIKEWAY
793 days 'n'wL99 Tue 10/15412
• I PLANNING 264 days Fn 10/1/99 Wed 11/1100 f
1.1 Concept/Alternative Planning 221 days En:0/199 Wed 11/1100 : .1_ j •
1. I Environmental
tiS daYS. von tw200 Fri .1 • -..
II I DESIGN 110 days Mon 4C�01 cn 906/01 I L. -
I '11 (CONSTRUCTION 97 days Mon 6/3/92 'r10/102— t .,... _ I J r—
I ue •
?C 4-1 IL 1-1
E
e •
•
Task Ia. i:i1 Summary .0 Rcied Us Progress . -
P oleo .1c^_Dwell Imerovemen¢ Sont Rhea Up ass !:: —emal Tries
C W/St2No' 1960.02 j
Cary Promo:No;9963 9O/00 Progress Relied Up Spat Prole/Summary
Mllenone 4 Ruled Up Milestone t1
Page 1
•
•
CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
1 0
AGENDA BILL
" Agenda Title: A/Ieedng Date: February'20, 2001
McDowell Boulevard'E. Washington Street Intersection
Transportation Improvement Project (Project No. 9863, Ph3):
Consideration of adoption of the resolution of necessity to acquire
property by eminent domain; Properties Assessor's Parcel Nos.
/Addresses are: 007-325-013/94 North McDowell Boulevard
(William and Ines Stark), 007=280-038/201 South McDowell
Boulevard (Ann Morrissey), 007-280-070/203 South McDowell
Boulevard (Washington Square Associates), 007-213-030/200
South McDowell Boulevard (Petaluma Properties, Inc.), 007-325-
012:/98 North McDowell Boulevard(Constance Lechmanski).'007-
340-007/North McDowell Boulevard (Maria Novak and Martha
Thorup), 007-213-002/228 South McDowell-Boulevard (Petaluma
Properties. Inc.). -
•
Department: Director: Contact Person: Phone Number:
Public Facilities and Rick Skladzien Mike Evert 778-4439
Services 979
ost of Pronosal: Account Number:
471,000 213-9863
Name of Fund:
Amount Budgeted: (Amount budgeted in 5-Year CIP for Alter. 1) PCDC
PCDC 1,300,000 Traffic Mitigation Fee
Traffic Mitigation Fee 2.387.000
$3,687,000
Attachments to Agenda Packet Item:-
Agenda Report
Letters to property owners, notice:of intention to adopt resolution of necessity, and property descriptions.
Exhibit C - Map of intersection irtiprovementS for Alternative 1.
Exhibit D- Map of project Alternatives 1, B-1, and C:
Exhibit E- Project'schedule from design engineer.
Exhibit F- Design engineer's project cost estimate. •
Exhibit-G - Copy of the,City Council Agenda Bill and Report of-December 4, 2000 (w/o attachments).
Exhibit H - Project mailing list of interested<parties..
Resolution of Necessity to acquire property'by'etninent'domain, with exhibits A and B.
EXUt & tT P
•
Summary"Statement:
At the December 4. 2000 City Council meetins City personnel stated that they would be back to the •
Council this spring with 'a recommendation to proceed with eminent domain proceedings in order to
obtain the necessary right-of-way for the McDowell/E. Washington St. Transportation Improvement
Project.
In order to insure that the contractor can start construction on this project, in. June 2001, the City
•
Attorney's office needs to take any and all steps necessary to obtain,the necessary rights of way for
construction. including steps to be in a position to initiate eminent domain and, if necessary,to initiate
said procedures as soon as possible.
One of the steps to initiate eminent domain proceedings`is for the Council to first adopt the resolution of
necessity. The Council is therefore, asked to consider the adoption of resolution of necessity for
properties located at Assessor's Parcel Nos./Addresses: ,007-325-013/94 North McDowell Boulevard
(William and Ines Stark), 007-280-038/201 South. McDowell Boulevard (Ann Morrissey), 007-280-
070/203. South McDowell Boulevard (Washington Square Associates), 007-213-030/200 South
McDowell Boulevard (Petaluma Properties, Inc:), 007-325-012/98 North McDowell Boulevard
(Constance.Lechmanski), 007x40-007/North'McDowell Boulevard (Maria Novak and Martha Thorup),
007-213-002/228 South McDowell Boulevard (Petaluma Properties, Inc.).
Council Priority THIS AGENDA ITEM IS CO'SSIDERED To BE PART OF, OR NECESSARY.TO, ONE OR
NIORE.OF THE 1999-2000 PRIORITIES ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARI>30, 1999 •
AND MARCH 18, 2000.
Priority(s): Regional Transportation Plan, and the Bicycle Plan.
Recommended City Council Action/Sugaested'Motion
Staff recommends,that the City Council adopt the resolution of necessity. •
Reviewed by Finance Director Reviewed by-City Attorney: Approved by City Manager:,
Date: r Date:
ill ■ ./ _1144 I
Toda"v's 1 ate: Revision.# and 1 ate`Revised: '•'" 1 e Code
1732/01. Mcdowel 34/pf&s staff folderane/s
•
•
•
•
- ='c-O P c �'
CITY OF PET:ALUMA, CALIFORNIA
• FEBRUARY 20, 2001
• AGENDA REPORT
FOR
TAE MCDOWELL BOULEVARD/E. WASHINGTON.STREET INTERSECTION
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEr1ENT PROJECT (P ROJECT NO. 9863, PH. #3)
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the December 4, 2000 City Council meeting, City personnel stated that they would be
back to•the Council this spring with a recommendation to proceed with eminent domain
proceedings in order to obtain the necessary right-of-way for the McDoweIlfE.
Washington St. Transportation Improvement Project.
In order to insure that the contractor can start construction on this project in June 2001,
the City Attorney's office needs to take any and all steps necessary to obtain the
necessary rights of way for construction, including.steps to be in a position to initiate
eminent domain and if necessary, to initiate said procedures;as soon as possible.
One of the steps to initiate eminent domain proceedings is for the Council to first adopt
the resolution of necessity. The Council is, therefore, asked to consider the adoption of
the resolution of necessity for properties located at Assessor's Parcel Nos./Addresses:
007-325-013/94 North.McDowell:Boulevard (William and Ines Stark), 007-280-033/201
South McDowell Boulevard (Ann Morrissey), 007-280-070/203 South McDowell
Boulevard (Washington Square Associates), 007-213-030/200 South McDowell
Boulevard (Petaluma Properties, Inc.), 007-325-012/98 North., McDowell Boulevard
(Constance Lechmanski), 007-340-007/North McDowell Boulevard (Maria Novak and
Martha Thorup), 007-213-002/228 South McDowell Boulevard (Petaluma Properties,
Inc.).
•
2. BACKGROUND:
The McDowell Blvd./E..Washington St. Intersection Transportation Improvement Project
is composed of three alternatives that were chosen'bythe City Council on October 4,
1999. Alternative 1 includes transportation improvements in the area of the intersection
(see Exhibit C). Alternative B-1 includes bicycle and pedestrian improvements over
Highway 101 from the northbound off-ramp of Highway 101 to Ellis Street on the west,
and Alternative C is being,studied for 5' bicycle lanes on both sides of E. Washington St.
from McDowell Blvd. to Adobe Road on the east (see Exhibit D). The project has
• continued to use Alternatives I. B-1. and C for identifying the specific improvements
because each Alternative-has its own funding. design. and construction scheduling issues.
1
The City Council directed City personnel to complete the contract documents to construct.
the Alternative:,I intersection improvements in2001(see,ExhibitC). Alternative B-I and
•
C are scheduled for construction in 2002 because these Alternatives have Federal funds.
The Federal funds require an NEPA environmental document, which could take
approximately 18 months to complete and.approve.
•
As part of the.McDowell/E. Washington St:Transportation Improvement Project, the
City has been proceeding in acquiring the fee;titles+and easements needed to do the
improvements: These,acquisitions are mainly small'strips:of property along McDowell
Boulevard. In all,eight fee titles and twelve easements are required from,eight property
owners. The one structure that is affected by the right-of-way acquisition is the
elimination to two of the eight gasoline pumps at the Beacon Service Station..
Geoff Hornsby, the City's right-of-way consultant, has submitted the offers to the
property owners, and is continuing to negotiate with the owners for the fee titles and
temporary easements. However,;in order to insure that the contractor can start work..in
June 2001,•staff is recommending that the Council adopt the resolutions of necessity
authorizing.the City Attorney, or his designee, to file eminent domain lawsuits to obtain
orders for the right of entry to construct the City's project. The orderswill permit the
contractor to start work on schedule.
Through eminent domain proceedings,a public agency can, through a court hearing,
obtain immediate possession of property in order to perform a public;project. Once
•
immediate possession is granted by the courts,;funds to purchase the properties are filed
with the courts,:and the public project proceeds. This procedure allows time:for the
property owner and'the City's right-of-way consultant (eminent domain appraiser), or the
courts; to arrive at an agreement to.finalize the purchase of needed property.
Mr. Hornsby will,continue to negotiate With the owners of the properties. Each of the ,
owners.was advised by letter, copies of which are attached, thattfie;City would continue
to negotiate with'them even if a resolution,of necessity is adopted. Government.Code
Section 72672 requires the City to submit written offers to the property owners. The
offers must set forth the-basis for the City's offer and the factual data supporting the
offer. A.2/3 vote(5 Councilrnembers) is required to adopt a resolution of necessity,
Project Schedule:
Several key project tasks such as design, right-of-way acquisition, environmental review.
assessment district formation, and utility relocation coordination are being tracked
simultaneously-in order to meet the'City Council's,goal'of constructing the intersection
transportation improvements in:Alternative l in the summer of 2001. The bicycle and
pedestrian improvements in Alternatives B-1 and;C are scheduled for 2002 in order to
complete the,environmental documents necessary for securing Federal funds. The
schedule for the two phases of the improvements is shown on Exhibit E. Right=of-way
acquisition'continues to be.the key issue in tile sc'hedule.
3. ALTERNATIVES:
a. Adopt aresolution of necessity,
b. Do not adopt a resolution of necessity and letthe right-of-way consultant complete
the right-of-way negotiations: This alternative would not insure that the needed right-
of-way will be available by June 2001. Lack of right-of--way will delay the project
and result in claims from the contractor.
c. Other combinations or options resulting from the discussion by the City Council.
4. FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Right-of-way cost .
The estimated cost for right-of-way acquisition was estimated in 1999 as $312,000. In
October 2000, during the preparation of the assessment district feasibility study, the
estimated cost for right-of-way'was increased to $803,000. This increase was to take into
account the cost of purchasing fee simple and temporary construction easements from the
Beacon Service.Station, The purchase of fee simple and temporary construction
easements from the BeaconStation will enable the contractor to construct the
improvements without blocking the travel lanes. At this time, the cost,of purchasing
right-of-way for all of theother parcels except the Beacon Station site, as included in-
these eminent domain proceedings,;is $471,000. The Beacon Station site is not included
in this packet because one additional easement is needed from the site. Once its cost is
determined, City personnel will come back to the Council for approval to negotiate its
purchase.
Total nrpject cost estimate
An update of the project's estimated costs by the design engineer for the three
Alternatives 1,B-1, and"C is shown on Exhibit F. The project's cost;estimate in October
1, 1999 is shown in thetop:block. The revised project cost as of September 5, 2000 in
shown in the middle block.-, The project's budget as shown in,the 5-Year Capital
Improvement Plan, is shown in the bottom block.
The increase in the design'engineer's project cost estimate,on September 5, 2000 of
$704,000 (for Alternate 1), includes:the Landscape Conceptual.Design A improvements
for $335,000,the special,concrete paver;crosswalks for$134,000, and to include
replacing the approach lanes on East Washington St. and McDowell Blvd. So. with
concrete instead of asphalt for an added cost of$235,000. These additions were
approved by the City Council on December 4, 2000. It is proposed that the Traffic
Mitigation Fund. PCDC. and an assessment district fund these improvements. •
The estimated cost for the bicycle and pedestrian improvements in Alternative B-I
(bicycle and pedestrian improvements over Highway 101) has remained the same.
3
The estimated cost for the bicycle and pedestrian improvements in Alternative C •
(McDowell Blvd. to Adobe Rd.) has increased to 53.046.000 (See middle block on
Exhibit F). The increase of$671,000 is because of the cost of the improvements along
Washington Creek.from•McDowell Blvd. to Sonoma Mountain Parkway.
An alternative of installing 5-foot wide bike lanes on both sides of:E. Washington St.
from McDowell Blvd. to Sonoma Mountain Parkway(Alternate C) is to'tum Lauren
Drive into a bike boulevard. This would reduce the cost of Alternate C and is explained
in more detail at the•end of this section.
Estimated costs for Alternative 1 imnrovernents•at the intersection:
Two project cost estimates are noted below: The cost estimate shown below and on the
left is the Design Engineer's estimate. The cost estimate shown below and on the right is
the,cost estimate as used imthe Assessment District Feasibility Study, and in the Final
Engineer's Report.
Estimated cost for Alternate 1"
intersection improvements, as:.used
in the Assessment District
Feasibility
Design Engineer's revised estimated cost Study, and in the Final
for Alternate 1 intersect on^improvements Engineer's Report
Admin/Inspection. $435,000 $435,000
PlanningDesign 435,000 435,000
Land Acquisition 303,000 803,000 (I)
Improvements 1,685,000 • 2,022,000 (2)
Contingency 421.000 421:000
•
Estimated Cost' $3;279.000. $4,116,000
(I) It is anticipated that the•assessment district will be formed prior to receiving.
construction bids. Because the amount of the bonding for an assessment district
cannot be raised after a district.is formed, the estimated costs for land acquisition
was increased by$500,000 to insure that.there is adequate funding,to°purchase
needed right-of-way. Once theappraisals are"completed and accepted, and bids
are received. the•surplus funds will be returned to the properties being assessed.
(2) As m (1).20%or$337,000'was added to the Design Engineer's estimated cost for
the improvements.
4
Estimated funded'sources-for Alternative 1 imnrovements'at.the intersection when using
the estimated cost shown in the Assessment:'DitrictFeasibility Study..and Final
Engineer's Report:
PCDC $1,300,000
Special Assessments 987,840 (3)
•
Traffic Mitigation Fund .1.828.160
Total proposed funding $4,116,000
3) The estimated funds generated by the assessment district are based on a substantial
contingency. The actual funding will be determined after a property appraisal is
completed and construction bids are received.
Total estimated,cost and proposedtfundins sources for all Alternates 1 (construction in
2001). B-1. and C (construction in 2002) when using the design engineer's cost estimate
of September 5,2000 (see Exhibit R) is as follows:
Uses:
Admin./lnspection $955,000
• Planning/Design 828,000
Land Acquisition 303,000
Improvements 3,656,000
Contingency 977.000
Total Cost '$6;719,000 (Design Engineer's project cost estimate -
see ExhibifF).
Potential Funding Sources:
PCDC $1.300,000
Special Assessments 987,840
Traffic Mitigation Fees 2,387,000
TEA-21 &TDA funds 1,050,000
Safe Routes to School grant 500,000
Undetermined funds 494.160 (4)
Total:funding $6,719,000
(4) This shortfall in funding will affect the bicycle and pedestrian improvements in
Alternatives B-I and C, scheduled for construction in 2002. An alternative of installing
5-foot wide bike lanes on both sides of E. Washington St. from McDowell Blvd. to
Sonoma Mountain Parkway (Alternate C) is to turn Lauren Drive into a bike boulevard.
• This would reduce the cost of Alternate C to $2.292.000 (a reduction in cost of
approximately$753,000.
5
5. CONCLUSION:
•
In older to proceed with eminent domain proceedines'to obtain the necessary property
interests;to insure that construction"can start in June 2001, it is necessary for the Council
to adopt the resolutions ofnecessity.
6. OUTCOMESOR PERFORMANCE MEASURENIENTS THAT WILL IDENTIFY,SUCCESS OR
COMPLETION:
Start construction of the intersection transportation improvements for Alternative l in the
summer of 2001..
7. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommendstfiat the City Council':adopt the resolution of necessity.
Mcdowe 1134/s:pf&s folder/me
•
•
6
•
Revised 2/21/01
MCDOWELL/WASHINGTON STREET
PROJECT MAILING-LIST
Dr. Charles Syers Craig Woolmington-Smith Stanley Felix/Joseph Felix Realty Co.
P. O:Box 1879 120Village Square, Ste.100 2000 S. Colorado Blvd., Ste. 2-640
San Mateo,CA 94401-0946 Orinda,CA 94563 Denver,CO 80222
Mark Friedman MadeleineAshe Councilmember Janice Cader-Thompson
7750 College Town Dr. 421 Yosemite 732 Carlsbad Ct.
c/o Fulcum Management Group Petaluma,CA 94954 Petaluma, CA 94954
Sacramento, CA 95826
Wayne'Leach Bob&s Karen,Greene Linda Scott
CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engrg. Group,Inc. 311 Olympic;Court 42 Arlington Dr.
1301"Redwood Way,Ste. 200 Petaluma;CA 94954 Petaluma, CA 94952
Petaluma, CA 94954
Nancy J.Casal
Bill Harrell, P.E. Richard DeCarli c/o Cooper,White & Cooper LLP
Wilbur Smith Assoc. P. 0.-Box 377 Attorneys at Law
10 145 Market St. Petaluma,CA 94953 133 N. Calif.Blvd., Ste. 450
cisco, CA 94013 Walnut Creek, CA 94596
•
Jack Balshaw Dor sPopky Mark J.Romero,Attorney
1680 Kearny Court .1349;Rainier Ave. 170 Columbus Ave., 5th fl.
Petaluma, CA 94954 Petaluma,CA 94954 San Francisco, CA 94133
William R. Stark Constance Lechmanski
1713 E.,Madison St. 4700'Acacia Way
Petaluma, CA 94954 Penngrove,CA 94951-9729
RE: 94 N.McDowell RE: 98';N.McDowell
Richard Myeis,.Pres. Ali Salkhi. Larry Fielbs
501 Willows Ct. 101 N.McDowell Blvd. Carrows Restaurant
Novato, CA 94945-3325 Petaluma,CA 94953 100 S. McDowell Blvd.
RE: Carrows Restaurant RE: Beacon Service Station Petaluma,CA 94954
Samantha Dougherty David Keller David Chang
,c/o The Plaza North 1327"I"St. CalTrans Design No. Counties
259B N. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94952 Box 23660
Petaluma, CA 94954 Oakland,CA 94623-0660
,.
Carmen Lytle Diane Reilly Tones David Woltering
c/o FulcUrn Mgmt. Group 1 657 Rainier Ave. 4739 Sullivan Way
7750 College Town Drive Petaluma,CA 94954 , Santa Rosa,CA 95409
Sacramento,CA 95826 1
EX 14 IL's IT G
Councilmember Bryant Moynihan Ed DeCarli Darlene Kehoe, CPA
P. O.Box "C" 52—6`"St. Trustee of the Co-Owner
Petaluma; CA 94953 Petaluma, CA 94952 The Joanne Novak St. Clair
Irrevocable Trust •
1301'Redwood Way
Petaluma,'CA 94951
Mary Allen Stephen R.Casaleggio,Attorney at Law Mary Grace Pawson
County Health.Services Jones Hall. Hams&Associates
1030 Center Dr, Ste..A 650 California'St., 18th Floor ' 775 Haywood Dr:,Ste.202A•
Santa Rosa,.C.A 95403 San Francisco,CA 94108 Petaluma,CA 94954
Geoff Hornsby Andy Plaine,MAI Chevron USA,Inc.
G.F.Hornsby&Associates 1855 San Miguel Dr., Ste: 6 P. O.Box 285 •
819 Third Street Walnut Creek,CA 94596 Houston,TX 77001
Santa Rosa; CA 95404
Maria I.Novak Gary Marques Dan Lutz
3Colleen.Court Carrows Restaurant,Dist. Mgr. Linz.Chevron
Novato, CA.94747 3355 Michelson Dr., Ste. 350 1440 E. Washington'St
Irvine,CA 92612 Petaluma, CA 94954 '
' Patricia'Tuttle Brown Ron Kinyon,Mgr.,Royal Oaks MHP John King, Sr,
513 Petaluma Blvd. So. 750 Wood Sorrel Drive do OlnisteadRealty
Petaluma;CA 94952 Petaluma, CA 94954 - 587 Lakeville St.
Petaluma:CA 94952
Ann Morrissey Mike Nave,:'Attorney
145 Laurel Grove Avenue Meyers Nave Riback Silver&Wilson
Kentfield, CA 94904 777 Davis Si.,'Ste. 300
San Leandro,,CA;94577
mcdewash/a
•
•
•
•
- •
• . -
. Mod:CURB le CUTTER EgfiallillallIMI rill . .
(SEE DETAIL"Er DVS SHEET) II -.. est.: - -11111-, a
Stmt.0141151111%-s i - -—•- - -
i r. I
,-.
S .
".
. 4'
. • „ 1, . . . .• . .. ,„ ...4.. . t..
40
• , -.,
I Cl. A :-: -H• . : -• -7 .719r
J' 4 -- •-• •II n_ ....4.
,ir. -
41' -
. .... . ..
- - -- 36---
1 r 4115--, ---------
25T7.62m) CURB -1.5 CP 1 P5" :,- la - -
--- -- adetal - .
i' S' . • a
`14.tWILTOSai1kN'.-E-..S'II•I_rh_`__,'_• _:-a:.•v•I .''''.-- -.r:a,* , ,1'' c.-;.---7-,:..:.r--:4 It)---2o-.o--,7'.7--• .,,--,-Af77'%' a
‘-. -a'—
s -7 : Ar- i-.
h--
32
. .
_ .
'‘ • '' 0 7: 14--I. 5 , I.,,":---.1-.-.-N-: ' •.-...7 1--....:1.:nt s' g., 'If ;:ift,
.,...,,..,,..........__ „.„-E, ., . - , ,,,,„ ._ . ..... . ,...., .. .
it
8,
28 L
• ‘111.„,t- . ' " -.' i^- •- ' " r.' , ';,. .1 V.:SI 12/.Nb 1-• .-.:•,.„, 1._, •,- tw ;,,,,t?'4' 1:3',4-.',• ' s
I+00
. - .
a°
-■-.—e—bir, l . 7 7 •- -,5 --.- V 2 I1TI
-
-- a . 1622 . !V` .- -
v ..riziNaBlr -
E. WASHINGT IP* to.
STREET
ao--
___L
• LEGEND
0 .
•-•'----..-........_..‘ ta ig.41,
/// I.smstda:GRIND pa(Ses 2Cftleyo2of Petaluma r". " I A .
WI 211 ) . •
4.., 70.2mm(g) CONCRETE(ULTRA-MN TOPPING -J I I
:Laren:car mr 152nrn(r) „,
IJJ . -'. '.) 36 —
r4:-..•-:=4 aa. matay faaana-,aanaip--en
,...,....,z.....,‘„.3,A moaorete Base NV Pavement - '11 . ... v- rl
RelzkorcMg bric iii
n CncFa . -. . . .,
* *--,.-4 L_
WIT V. 1
NEW PAVEMENT SECTION (137mm(5.5")AC. over Q
Tea . 5.50mrn(22")of Aggregate Base CL 21 0 ' .."." " I..
IF+ + +
2n (5 AC. RESURFACING . , ... /
+ 4. I ' , .. r- 7 I 7Z “- '7 r I
. 1 • .0. -ja-': I .
+
32---
' r Al 11
it 4
. 1 7 14T + +; AI 1 1
• ' I q I + + / NOTE Aft ELEVATIONS E TOP OF PAVEMENT
+ ÷
41, 1 .4. L_ UNLESS NOTED 0111ERwISE.
Pp 21+ +
— 4 r ad-wetc. SUP; ' „t, r
I.5rr
, I I
28—I
- __
,•-4
PLAN
SCALE: l'e20'
1
a.qc " 1+00
m - ,
' .
11
f
UP
NEJ
RA iircisn5
• I2 W 4i'2 n,
()1
52r
4 ,
us A verve mast CURB a FALL AWAY Gunn? 25'(7.62rn)TRINSMON STD. CURB R'Cillitit
Afklaita,
E WASHINGTON St
L><.— 1-11eDI -1 H.
Mod. CURE
CURB TRANSITION •
, 113 DETAIL"A" 4 5.14E,ETS DETA
''.:trite.,
NOT TO
- " to ro sour
- ,
-'_.::74-1-: 1..21.(1.,-.‘4.:1 '.'"..3.....*.;,':. -etc.I..LI" ...":"."-5." L."I"..'.i-rte2.vc,:,--..;;:::.('-:.:.,vr•-'--: . ',` A .• - .s . "
i0096Y Y'JS/SM1
jigu rar-.0-w/erni wm.»wnnu'rnuu mm�rt .. r
I
A11 ' P Y6y - - DNN33NIDN3 A IN3YUWd30 C9861a39N1N�1'J3EG
NV7dIDNIAVd,HALLVHOJHO NOI1JH58H1NP
:00701.1
aoz a� �i s3aoas n,lw V % (1 '1 V 1.3 d AO Al 1 3 NOLIJHSHfl.t41•IS NOIDNIHSVMHYOAIH T]athoa'n
1
4
•
394 42 a�� �� 384 IA�YI,I15
pp e Ift 'FI)i, j£V _
di ■� ri11 Ib.,
is 4rlcit*rfIrfr-.
a o..r °�i r
A'di�N:t+'G ifa: D ' 61al�
1L I
I
LTIµ � k' a a was. it
YM £. I I-` 1- I �IIVft x Jbal Mlw h M...nm.»it ,._,.._ b 4 ^ )
=Esc�0 Iry if,
rip ,� s , ,
tg g
Z
-fl'11� I,r 441_ 4 j� It l'
•
e
A � a 4
999 A N o yr
D::
° ��� it 1
.n ZIP e.• t nn wn / N l l.1 i la.- 4S
_ 3le f m W 4 G I'
SgO 4.'Wi1iL1 ,n;t � 1eLi - a A i ■ r
'Ir „„ ,,,p�rnTIMI I �1 i•
n un f rc5 fL°.i.. y
III niiiiIIIIi111 1an11iWIII N at 54 i yyl ”.Yy�,y, fR -
T r�� e M '∎ \ El Y.., tlrt te
ti 0 y 5 I F f��„�i rynq, ®® II .�11 e y
2` 'r® x , J I'I j / T� I M Idl r4cr
nntmW rY° � IJ
n N gar, r •
I a 4 •�.ri a` '�� �!t o 1 g,;r 4 U • rya. D a a I t j
I
III ppjj��99 _ .:
/ 1111p1 ■ TMIN11py TJr
il I 4 9 5 5 0%!u
K twAhumining nommumrantum 7Nii1 &@11 ( ,
t.
I
0
1-21Y 10096 .ry u.a $Mt y ,m w .r m tinnue'ewa u.an a. _ ': 0986:,uen,,N 1J3r'Otld q W
r+ SS;Sr - ss W OMU33NIfH3 40+x31\INYa34 SENL10O 1SHM1W ONr SNOISOHS I.iLVLHO'.NOI10IN91SNOD &, in
ofe33 s3aoes x:i,,,c• Y II fl 1 V 1 3 d J 0 A 1 0 ISOLIDES?IHZNII''1S NOTONIDI5YM'HI CIA7H TIHMOO'Nd
• i93 =. N
y
�p 1" E Pi p 2
'veltAlit z b
Ea-
j....H..■■■•■■•■ I
•
E 3 . €
I
IC i egc 1 ,a .s� 1 r3•n 4, ; * E4 6 , ;
m a ? a 1o !I 1 : I
\ \
CB r ;nr+ yr 61
Mc DOWELLL gEy ■■® + immiu m __
tee:;. ,l. .. ,
ma" �g,ime�,; n■01 i i�
gin ii
z _
sit l 1—
9 � a
Ey" 91rrnnnnlnnnl nnnnnl t1 (IIIbuIMLa'd rr! `� Z E S
9' amm�rnnnnrmm�r°m°r�� ?S 4 N W b b
7 .. V .15‘ 3 - ' e
13 as N idgp 6 •
1:11k 1 S s
ffi �
, T„ „ cps2N51 A
LW961 5mt — r-w'/aw wm.nn�r wu urm v C966 tl6M1(N 1 3lOtld a.g • N oIS s ;,,,, -VAS y gNtl33NnN3 m i NIrrdAa SYOI ^aS QUEYY16S.:ONINOISH3WIC
I RIl'1JU 113.LS 1Y3IdA8 N23 l
L Nrr %w S3 ods ma;; Y R fI 1 V 1 3 d J 0 A l I'0 NOLLORSB121NI'LS MOIDHII➢SYAA'8P®AIS 112 AO PEN 9 -
•
Sawq
+ 111mpIli!illlil/11111191!1�1 '.
•i-'nag— i -111111!ll!111i1i10 X111,''
11.Iu11Jd11 44:.
_a -. _.4rn .N
liMRPIPi i!!aili' _. .r D _ °
Irl•
. '�.o ICI!11 N Itdl 1!1!11• l r
•
1 L - � ,
I,
•
V
. ".Il,ili:iiaiililiai!i��'•i ' I .. 5i-._ 'I�Y 9.
11!!111!1!1'11°Ili i ���jjj 1.1 it 1 1 1 n��_ arias
n11i9!li!191i111!1!1!9 N�(i�i 1111 1�i1i�ii jllil gel F
x .i 1!6 11�� .111. rtl if , .
lllll.IClllilill. l
1.11. m Ettke
t 1.ip Ili
• 111[!1 5x
'1111 xR Ti
1111' 1k •
• }� i11!1:11:19i111i11 ij �' r�
llll111111919i9111�i1i ii lli�!911, lielig111i �Txi k
p ., �11!1 1!il•11.1111111• i 1 111.19.N.1u1111 Wit -
il!1 s 4_, .
9.1111 '-nr
:inn•
$ • II'; b N 4 s �!1_ rttrl� . 6 ,o
S 1 i Z C a 1111! L N Z'C
Illli:i'll1f!il;!1!I i! ;Wf . «Si •
�1111i111119191!1111:1�1® �.. 11� I,11!i11!1!i 111111111 'nIH:79i� .k.
s .:-ll0 ATlIIIl•4°iiillsi k I - 1•l'11111191C111!1!9! sr �.
e , 1 1 46i11i11\111!191!� : 1ryJJIJI
diT51R -.. ,
• :•
•
u
II! f 1!1111j1 1 1!I i'!1xT'3n�
1111•ll1i119/111!�!!11 6 xaR1
1• Irl 1• I 1 • ,. 11 1 R x
HIl♦ ,I Ali�111i11�!��i9'ji11 -
pup i ppu 14343
I•1.1.11 11 Ild 1111111 �' 9!1;11 il(1�E N �� .
ag\\ in.m11.11.N.11111L 1 b �eyq 1
1:
S
g
2
•
Resolution.No. N.C,.S.
• of the City of Petaluma, California
DETERMINING THAT:THE;PUBLIC,INTEREST AND NECESSITY
REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION OF FEE SIMPLE AND/OR
TEMPORARY':CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AND
DIRECTING THE FILING OF EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS FOR
THE McDOWELL BOULEVARD/E. WASHINGTON STREET
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 9863
WHEREAS, it is desirable, and necessary for the City of Petaluma to acquire the fee
simple and/or temporary construction easements, particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof by reference, in order to implement the objectives of the project;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma is vested with the power of
eminent,domain to acquire real property by virtue of Article 1, Section 19, of the Constitution of
the State of California, and Sections 1240.050, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.125, 1240.150, and
1240.410 of the Code of Civil Procedure,of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil
Procedure of the State of California, notice has been duly given to all persons whose property is
to be acquired by eminent domain and whose names and addresses appear on the last Sonoma
County equalized assessment roll, all of whom have been given a reasonable opportunity to
appear and be heard before the city of the City of Petaluma on the following matters:
a) Whether the public interest and necessity require the Project;
b) Whether the Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with
the greatest public good and the least private injury; and
c) Whether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
d) Whether the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has been made to the
owner(s) of record.
ill
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Petaluma does
hereby resolve as follows:
1. The public interest and necessity require the-Project to construct the McDowell Boulevard/E.
Washington Street'Transportation Improvement Project;
2. The Project is planned 'and located in'the manner which will be most compatible with the
'greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. The ,taking of pertnanent fee simple and/or temporary construction -easements, more
particularly described in said Exhibit "A" is necessary for the Project;
4. The offer required' by Section 7267:2 of the Government Code of StateoffCalifornia-has.
been made to the owner or owners of record of the real property;
5. The. City Attorney of the City .o£ Petaluma, or his duly authorized designee, is hereby
authorized and directed to institute and conduct to conclusion an action in eminent domain for
the:acquisition of the estates and interests aforesaid.:and to take such action as he may deem
advisable or necessary in connection:therewith;
6. An,order for prejudgment possession -nay be•obtained in said action and a warrant issued to
the State Treasury Condemnation Fund, in the amount determined. by the Court to be so
deposited, as a.condition to the right of immediate possession. .'
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of saidCity.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution wa's introduced and'adopted'by the
Council of the City,of Petaluma'at a Regular meeting On Approved as to
,by the following vote: form:
CityAttomey
AYES:
•
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor •
•
i F 1B "A"
•
•
•
•
OWNERS: MARIA NOVAK AND MARTHA THORUP
PROPERTY #8
Properry No. 3 (R/W
APN 07-340-006
Date: May 15, 2000 •
EXED3T1'A"
All that certain real property situate in the City of Petaluma, County of Sonoma, State of.California.
described:as follows:
A portion of Parcel 3,as shown upon that certain man entitled;"Parcel Map No.6,"recorded in Book
109 of Maps at Page 15, Sonoma County Records,more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING at the•most Easterly corner of said Parcel3,being a point on the Southwesterly line of
McDowell Boulevard as shown on said map;
thence leaving said ivlcDowell Boulevard along the Southeasterly line of said Parcel 3,South 36'05'30"
West, 15.00 feet;
thence leaving said Southeasterly line, North 54°31730" West, 152.33 feet;
thence North 52°09'36" West, 7.17 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Parcel 3:
thence along said Northwesterly line:North 36°05'30"East, 14.70 feet to the most northe lycomer of said
Parcel. 3 being a point on said Southwesterly line of McDowell Boulevard:
thence along said Southwesterly line of McDowell Boulevard,South 54°31'30"East, 160.00 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 2.393.46-feet. more or less.
•:•
F.'4‘1Jg0.1/4V260C0C0\AD=5•15-00a 960
•
. \\------ H I •
• . \
I McDOWELL BLVD.
0
1
•
— EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
AREA = 2,398.45 S.F.
N54'31,'30°W P.0.3.
N54'31'30"W 152.83'
(I Li
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY—1. Li
W
o.I N 52'09!36° W t o I-
N
Ln
7.17' F-
o I ^ LJ I
w
I-.1 Z
- FAR Ca 3 o h o u °
o
o I -1-.5 JO —I 2
I
H '` ° p I z
I Iz z 1 <
- - 160.00' _ \I/ (n
•N54'31'30'.W I Q
(!)
1 U
1
FMcI i
EK. JG9 PG., Ji5'
I
I
I
EXHIBIT "B" Property No. a
A.P. No. 07-540-006
I
Ifl :f •. SCALE: 1"=40' -
01/22/01 10:40 J08 —T'4.90002
W [ S CSW/STUEER—SiRCEH
! � ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. MCDOWELL BLVDJE WASHINGTON
CONSULTING ENGINEERS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
7901 DeLeng Ave., Novato, CA. 94945-3246 R/VV ACQUISITION
(415) E92-4753 FAX (415) 892-4502.
0'2000 PETALUMA SONOMA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
•
SOR^nom\,^2,n, ,c :� o_ rnnad�nr
Propen_y No. 3 (TCE)
APN 07-340-006
Date: May 15, 2000 •
EXFIIBIT "A"
All that certain'real.pronertysituate in the City ofPetaluma.County of Son_orna,Sate,of California
described as follows:
Portions of Parcel 3"as shownunon that certain map entitled,"Parcel Map No 6,'recorded inBook109
of Mans at Page 15,.Sonoma County Records,mote particularly described as follows;
PARCEL 1:
A Temporary ConstructionEasement25.00 feet in width;measured atnsnt angles,lyin_"adiacent to and
Northwesterly of the Southeasterly line of the said'Parcel3,excepting therefrom the Northeasterly 15.00
feet thereof.
Containirr2.2,750 square:fee;, more or less.
PARCEL 2:
A Temporary ContsuOnonEasemeat 5:00 feet in-width.measured at right angles;lying,adi acentto and •
Southwesterly Of the following described lines:
BEGE -MN-Q atapoint which bearsNonh54°31'30"East,25.00;feet and South 26'05130"West, 15.00
feet from the rnost-Easterly comer ofParcel3 as shown upon that certain map e'iutjed Parcel Mar No
6,"recorded Maack:109 of Maps.at Page 15, Sonoma County Records;
thence Nonli,54c31' 0"hest, 177.83 feet:
thence North 52°09136" west 7'1 7ifeet to-a opinion the Northwesterly line.ofsaid Parcel 3 and the
terminus of the herein described Easement.
'Containing 675 sau"are-feet,.more or less.
S 2 d Te npomr'Correct onEasements sa 1 terminate uron the Eno-of a Certificate of l omnie'ion with
the Sonoma County Recorce-forthe\lcDotte1 Blvd IF Washington SL Intersec ion Tramp'orati on
Improvements Project,"Project No. 9363, Phase III.
F:'Atl.P:9Y?50`10f04'Wdc'J.15.003 560 •
•
,
-..-7 \--...
I ,
—
.
. McDOWELL BLVD.
f--- EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
i N54731'30°W
1 AREA=2,.398.46 S.F.
14.70'1 15' I 2F,1)
N54'31'307W 127.83' ----=...„ 1 I
LLH---
1 e I t-- -. ' - -- 11
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY, ' POE r::::::: '
a I
• N 5709'S W 7.17' I
tri I-
N PARCEL 2 r'i..:.: ::::i >4 I (I)
TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT /
AREA=675 SF.
a
CD
n — PARCEL '3 r: :. <1.: b c--)
1c1 : En'
I to EK. 109 FG, 4r5 Z
. I
ni --7
1
I z PARCEL 1 :..... :::.! n I- 1
7.
kill/ TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT. ..
-
AREA 2,730 S
_ - T.-
S.F. ..,.. lt 1 :: 1 v) (-9 ' Eizic
160.00'
1--
N5431'30" AI --"--"- 5,.. V)
<
I Li
I
. FARCRI i
BK. log Fa -I-5 •
I
1
EXHIBIT "B" Property Na. 8
_ • A.P. Na. 07-340-008
LirliiTAT: 17 SCALE: i"----40'
01/22/01 11:18 JOE #4-.96002 .•
0 CSW/S711.18E3-STROEH ,
INC McDOWELL BLVDJE WASHINGTON
/ [ St] . B I
ENCINERiNG CROUP
CONSULTING ENGINEERS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
790 DeLong Ave., Novato, CA. 94945-3245 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT
(415) 892-4753 FAX (415) 892-4502
0 2000 PETALUMA SONOMA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
, .
,
I
----/ • \____ _ _ I – – --I I
,
McDOWELL BLVD. .
PARCEL 24 - CI
•
, .
1
TEMP. 'CONS:i. EASE.' ‘
EXISTING MW AREA=-3;522 S.R. '''
, .... ..... _, _ ;_. / N .54f.3130. W .
• ' -
-= -
/--PR-OPOSED RA . 1-4-)N25',"\ .i
. -1
4-1____ .
. r v i Nlitall I . 'ilia ■ , \ 'Cli
, S 5709'36, •E • If .
. .:. 1...) 0 ': ' ' -
: ,.,..3 •C__,:.A.- • "__ '1 E
r:
FP .
LL, MEDIAN -- CONC. POST, I rn
ISLAND, TYR. TIP. OF 4 1-cn b U. (1)
.tn
45- a FAJ9CEL [ Linn .z Z
3
'9, -0 t
• I co 1_ 0
z 1--
BK C)9 pa -is I oln •CD- i H•
cp. . •
I .•
-
kvi
• • 160.00' I
CO (7)
N 54"31'30" W ----7- < <
' .
E-
V)
PARCEL 1 —
.L..!
BK Jog PG; 715 •
. .
•
•
EXHIBIT "B" Property No a •
. . A.P. No 07—'340-006.
,
• C SW . SCALE; 1"=40'
C$W/STUBER—S11ROEH , 12/29/00 15:50 JOB 44 06002 ,1111
[ St]'2 ENGINEERING OUP, INC McDOWELL 'BLVDJ,E..WASHINCTON!
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
coNsuoiNc ENGINEERS. .. , - _
790 DeLong Ave.., No\;ato, CA. 9492-5-3246 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT
(415) 892-4753 FAX (415) 89274502
0 2000 PETALUMA SONOMA COUNTY CALIFORNIA
7: ,,
40. Date: 'January 4, 2001
File: 4.960.02
1 Property No. 3 (TCE)
' APN 07=340-006
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL 2A:
A temporary construction easement,being a portion ofRarcel No. 3,;as shown upon that certain map
entitled"Parcel Map No. 6",recorded in Book 109 of Maps/at Page 15, Sonoma County Records,
more particularly described as.follows:
' COMMENCING at the most easterly corner of Parcel No. 3, as shown on said map;
thence along the most northeasterly line North 54°3 P30" East 25.00'.feet;
! thence South 36°05'30" West 20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning.;
thence South 36°05'30"West26.00 feet;
thence North 54°31'30" West 135.43 feet to the most westerly line of Parcel No. 3;
thence along said westerly line North 36°05'30" East 26.06 feet;
thence South 52°09'36" East 7.12 feet;
thence South 54°31'30" East 123.31 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 3,522 square feet more or less.
0
E'Ad-?et W P6094\Dcc901-08.01.960