The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Bill 05/07/2001 (8) OICSW. [St] 2. •• . . . . t 4 . • - , • n • .• e • . • . . . . •- . , • . . . - . . REQUEST FOR PROJECT PROPOSAL . PETALUNIA RIVER/TRAIL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT • FROM 4 • . . " FROM LYNCH CREEK Tfl f!Ps' STREET . . . • . . Tel (415) 8924763 • CITTOFPETALUMA, For (415) .892-4502 • POST OMPEs BOX Email Officeecrasticom PETALUa,,C.A.:§4053-0061 l4ovato. 94945 • • • 4-r--a gam- • 1: • .__ II', I - OCSW i4r4t, :•---.-isoc. t ESti 2 • s"--%.• 1 _ - - -•:, ..1 .4t----, --: --..115";c:7....-L-Znctaii.. ..:A2.1e.L1 .21 : .:0-e7.4 .„ .,.. --&t5:-----..- - „r ;--iti- - . • , 4....40` i4411%;---.30-^` 'It' . .- '-'..-T;T: '`R.11.:-0, ....1' j?..rr.--itItc$41pe 4.:fr ''‘ "-- '". n .:: mi • • ,‘4.k. .-c-..'"'" ;:f.-..".--.",4,71 g5..rdaty.ti.,_viirt : -s- -3*:-,. '4; .;.. : ,,,,,, 4-475-1-r ....—::.-ajw---t-t kt—tr"--L.---<-- --0! e-Znri-nt2r , soe .. .,.4.,..s.:4 a1/4ifgatierat4&-anoc-M■Sita2r. .05,,,,t .4(Pilatlil : r“WminlY,N.Wtn 2:--tP .ete-ta., ...r4,- --rerat3,-S-a.ain.::-• 47,^t14 ,..4.T'el*eriCatt,3.:14, itg'•-•-:.:41• • ':--'1,1,•-__c ■-• r:ea-,7"Vea!-4i-la ilLterk's %Se3 .,- 4,W-01-,--ei--40 2 -* *e.--Wsii acres-- - - .:Ialnirta,PIM''.:C-C 1;41A f 1.- -t,r, i •," Al....;:A t.1417 eitt-e_mrli—.0--4.: *tieff: . ri.,,Ii-rr2;.t.- -s*'ci,'-i.rear4dessvAtze-trts.47-...-..-_,,i. L'5.. &:;:ijk, ',Vr.;,,,;"Si,d4inc--;•,'"Vi.114, ":iP7-7;7^.( 7+74c7a• .tev.cat i PETALUMA RIVER • 'TRAIL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT PROPOSAL F . tel. (415) 892-4763 , Fax (415);892-4502 'Email Officelecsvist2.com _ . =SW/Stuber-Stroeh , . _ 790 DeLong Avenue Novato, CA 94945 Painting by 'Jae& island CSW/Stuber—Stroeh • ll+ 2. TEL (415)-892-4263 FAX:,(415):892-4502 J • E-Mail: Office@cswst2:corn • GSW/Stuber-Sttoeh EngineeringGroup Inc. • Engineers • .Land Planners Surveyors • Landscape'Architects Date: December 1, 2000 'File: 7.77,1:495 MikeTvert Engineering•.Manager City of Petaluma' Department of Public•Eacilitiesk&Services 22Bassett;Street Petaluma, CA 94952 RE: RFP FOR PETALUMARIVER%TRAIL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT • Dear,Mike:, • We;apprecrate the,opportumtrto;provde DS W/Stuber-Stroeh's(CSW/Stn's)proposal to provide the services outlined in your.REP.dated November 7,2000: We areexcited at the prospect of being able to work•closely With,theCityof Petaluma;on;the revitalization of one of the City'smostimportant downtown corridors. Base on'the information`presented,CSW/St2 will, if selected,be responsible for completing=allutasksas outlined in the RFR: • The goal o f our services is to•provide the infrastructure and=services:needed to adequately support development of this street improvement project..Weare confidenfthat.OuncjuilifiCationa'‘Vilf meet andlexceed the-level of competence,and:commitmentrequired for this project. This proposal expires 90'calendar-days from the date of this;letter If you have any questionsor comments regarding the enclosed•Statement of Qualifications;,•please call°me at(415) 8924763 • • Warm;regards CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING,GROUP,INC.. 7 . Dennis D. Rinehart: DDRisef • x:Ne-Rov9wr5MncdP�z=r-00 ees. 790 De LongAvenue;Novato,:California.94945. 1301;Redwood Way,"Suiie'200„Petaluma California"94954 • H . f . n I' PETALUIVIA RIVER/TRAIL ENHANCEMENT PROTECT LYNCH: CREEK. TO "D"'STREET . I • CITY 'OF :PETALUM A 1 • • ,December,I„2Q00 .Prepared.byi .• CSW/Stuber,-Stroeh EngineeringGroup„Inch 79.0 DeLong Avenue • Novato; California 494 • • • .' • H;Ad-Nov\WP50V\Car\I2-1-00 495' • • • ti Date: December 1, 2Q00' File:: 7 771 49 PETAIIIMA MVERiT•RAIL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT ,1 INTRODUCTION 'The.City ofP,etaliiina haa'great opportunity toifurtherrevitalize,redevelop;andenhance its unique character and`diversity. ThetIconeeptIOT.theprojectLasLa whole; is to,create!a:non motorized'transportation link along" the Petaluma-River This corridor.will enable the Crty,tobuild uponithe.`heritage of diversity,.'maintaining • and improving itsbiological,historical,comrnercial,and`industrial diversity and heritage by blending urban eleiiients`with:the natural'and wild: 'The Petaluma RiverTrail will becomeithe vehicle linking•;existing and�futureneighborhoods to'a'yarietyof uses;,such as commerce,transportation parks,iand futuredevelopmeiits•envisioned in theTetaluma Specific Plan., It will provide-a"viable alternative to automobile travel•and provide stgr ifioant recreational amenities for residents, employees, and tourists alike:" me Petaluma River Trail will require ADA„accessible connections links, paths, bridges;docks, planting, signage and interpretive centers and infrastructure;to. enable fluid linkage toccur' Landacquisitionand'theestablishment'of rights of-way;biological_resources,,geotechnical',archaeological, structural,•and jurisdictional'aspects;all,come into.play as partof:the establishmentand'construction of the • trail and its componentparts. The;central aspect of the:prolect isYthe MasterPlan_Redevelopmentand Beautification o€Water-Street with its river frontage;the jewel and life blood ofPetaluma. Theheritageiand history=must be used"as a keydesign, element as described in the Petaluma River Access Enhancement Plan, The Master Planning of W ater Street will build upon'theCity's authenticlwaterfront=heritage "'The iuccess of the aeautification will`become the springboard for the:contin uingredevelopmentandrefocusing ofP.etalumatowardtheriverandtumingbasin; This;refocusing is"critica •;toiPetalunla s downtown vitality and continued success. For`_these'reasons, it is understood by our team_.that,the conceptual,;preliminary,,and master plans must be.designed as:,individual components that are part ofia greater,cohesive,and.comprehensive whole. As-individual tasks"are tackled thereawill be specific items concernsrand'concepts that will require attention. There wilhbe importantresearch^aiid•evaluation of the;options,opportunitiessand constraints ofthe project, which will help_$drivethe,concepts.(The construction,andafinal'implementation of the protect will require forward thinking, 'innovative and.,creative ideas as 'well as substantial.. engineering science .and coMmunicationwith multiple agencies the City:of Petaluma and"tliepubhe atlarge::In'this design,process, •costfevaluation, safety; and longevity=of proposed-components‘will bedn¢Cdnstantreview, since we;intend to provide`thediest,produetat themost reasopatIle;cost: The'success of•therentire;projectdoes not rexplusiVely,fegt-with%the designers, engineers, or the^City of Petaluma Itisalso driven;and developed with'the involvement,ofthe community The established reports, records, plans, and historical text in conjunction with community'involvement through workshops and interviews nius't!all play atpaft for successfiilhresult: N:Wd-Nov\WP60\7106r112-1=006951 • • 1,t 1! •• ,! • • • V Petaluma River/Trail Enhancement Project December 1, 2000 Page 2 COMPANY:OBJECTIVE' Qur objective with this project is to'create a new focus on the river front,1utili2ing the heritage, community involvement,and our design'expertise to create the•best possible solution`forfuture plans and development. The master plan will be developed in concert with a holistic approach to the preliminary and conceptual design for the River Trail'. Our team!slgoal is to link,through this ever corridor,the multiple uses,activities, regions,and planned future developments in a smooth;direct,and imaginative fashion. These goals will be accomplished through'the'proper evaluation,re-engineering, and construction of the trestle, as well as an evaluation and understanding of•geotechnical,.biological, land use, circulation patterns, and cost analysis. • There will be clear and concise communication of design concepts, developed through community workshops,public meetings,and public forums.The community's plans,goals,and needs will be integrated into the plan preparation. Our objective is to meet all of these goals'through our professional expertise and experience, personal community knowledge and involvement,:and out team's dedication to the project. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED • • Topographic.survey • Boundary Survey to Identify: • Limits of work • Jurisdictional Boundaries/:Limits • Title research to identify easements,property owners, and'rights-ofway • Soils engineering issues • Site design, including: • • Grading and drainage plans • Utility plans, including;undergrounding;of existing,utilities • Jointtrench design • Street lighting.layout. • Landscape architectural design/Water Streetrbeautification and Paving • Structural'evaluation of and recommendations for the trestle Western to "C"Street • Coordination'of: • Civil Engineering- CSW/Sty • Structural.Engineering-,CSW/St2 • 'Landscape Architecture- CSW/St2 • • Utility coordination • Soils Engineer•-Harding ESE • Biologist•-`Harding ESE • • Jurisdictional Agencies Assist City in applying.for permits: .U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • California Department of Fish and°Game, • Bay Conservation and Development Commission.(BCDC) • Northwestern Pacrfic•Railway Authority • Sonoma County`Water,;Agency HdAd-Nov\WP60\7\Ca\\I21-00495 ti • • • . ., .. ;E+1 -,:.>, • 0 ; 041z 1 0-1 < I • -. ' ... t . . . ,....°: •'. .... • . . .. ...,, ....,... . . . ,. °.• . -• ...) .. • • • . • . . . . • . • - . :-.),:•,,,,,:ii....: :::::,:..„1-,- ..•.! . . . ' . , . . „..- . ' . . . • . . , . • . .. .. . . • vv Petaluma.River/Trail Enhanm ceent Project •• December 1, 2000 ,Rage 3 • National Marine Fisheries • Sonoma.County,Tlood-ControlDistrict • • Regional'Water Quality Control Board Construction Management/.Observation(performedby CSW/St2). • Bidding assistance including: • Bid package preparation • Specifications • Bid:selection,progess. • Pre-bid/pre construction meetings • Community forums.and•workshops, PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH Managing the Project: CSW/Stuber-Streeh's project:management style and approach includes the careful review of budgets, schedules, construction.admtnistration,:and clear and continued communication. Our success with project management comes from our ability to utilize in-house staff,our years of proj ect experience,and professional relationships•with our selected sub'-oonsultant team. • CSW/St2's in-housetechnical staff comes from avariety of disciplines,,with many years of experience. We work in a team,format, with shared goals:, Our in-house work and,coordination is enhanced by our quality . control and assurance methods. Alt plans are checked and rechecked by senior:staff.before they leave the office. This:check:system helps eliminate errors and omissions. 1. Budget: Protect budgets are checked and evaluated on a weekly basis,by the project senior staff member. Task hours, project goals, and projections are kept in check through this tracking system. • 2. Schedule: , project schedules are based on our initial.estimated time evaluations. At the award of a projct; these,time,allotinents are secured In;the event:that time constraints come into play,we have the ability to pull froma.large staff for extra assistance,to meet project goals. Regular - meetings,e-mail communication,-and phone contact with our-sub-consultants allows us to keep the team on track with a minimum of expense: 3. Construction Observation: Wntheach phase ofwork and dtsciphne,there is a team member that will be involved in construction observation: This allows us to be specific about each phase and aspect of construction. We also have mdividual'staffnienbei-s'who specialize in construction observation and administration. 4. Communicationrwith the1Citc of Petaluma: ,Communication with the City will he conducted throughthe role ct manager. There will always bean open line available to specific individuals, with the majonty of dialog and discourse occumng at designated meetings Again,to eliminate large meetings and costly gatherings,telephone,e-mail,memos;.and fax communications will be utilized when appropriate. H:\Ad-Nov\W P60\7\Cory2-1'-00.495 „.. „..„„. . < 'z Ic:).11u • 1, • '10.:` .Y• .<1 • . • • • • •. • . . • • N p . Petalurn a;River/Trai I • Enhancement Project Debe'mbcr 1, 2000 Page 4 • PETALUMA TRAIL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT .Technical Approach and Scope:of Work ' TECHNICAL APPROACH CS W/Stuber-Stroeh and Harding ESE:will combine their expertise-to:best serve die City of Petaluma during the development of its River Walk. Our combined technical approach to the Petaluma River Trail Enhancement,Project consists of any distinct-task groups, with specific variations occurring-within.these groups depending on the nature of the specific challenges involved,in achieving the required tasks as listed in the request for proposal. Our approach for this project would be as follows: 1. Review Reports,Plans, and'Docuinents The first task group containsthe document and operation review of pertinent agency reports,plans, and documents affecting the project. Our review would include?Sonoma County Water.Agency, Army Corp of Engineerflood control plans and "as built drawings,"Petaluma River Access Plan, • Bicycle Plan;Petaluma Specific Plan;parcel maps,easements;setbacks requirements,soils reports, and other;agency documents and'.associated requirements and restrictions. This review will include obtaining an environmental regulatory agency database report that identifies properties within the vicinity of Water-street (from-East Washington to Western Street) having documented hazardous"materials/wastes problems+or,the potential to impact,the.Site. It-is Harding, ESE's opinion that because under,grounding of utilities isdbeing:evaluated`for this area there is the potential to encounter hazardous materials/wastes during subsurface improvements. The recommended lists and;records reviewed will iriclude,but is not°limited:to, the following: • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's). • .EPA's;National Priorities List(NPL) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability, Information System (CERCLIS) _ , • EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery ,• California Department of Health,Services Information System (RCRIS); which includes (DHS)Bond•Expenditure.Plan(BEP) Hazardous Waste Generators,Transporters;Treatment, Storage and :Disposal .Facilities; Corrective Action, •(CORRACTS),:and'Violators Lists • . • California Environmental Protection Agency' • California'Depainnentof Toxic Substances (Ca]/EPA)CalSites Annual Work Plan(AWP) :. Control(DTSC)CalSites(ASPIS) • California Office of,.Emergency Services (OES) Cal`-EPA's Hazardous Material Sites CalifomiaHazardous'Material Incident Report Systefii (Cortese) (CHMIRS) • Califo'rnia State Water Resources. Control Board • SWRCB Proposition 65 Notification (SWRCB) Leaking Underground Storage Tank Records (NOTIFY 65) Informauon System(LUST) • California lntegrated,Waste ManagementBoard'Solid • SWRCB. Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Waste Information Systemt(SWIS) ,(-Toxic Pits) • SWRCB/Cal-EPA Hazardous Substance • SWRCB Waste Management Unit Container Database (UST) and Facility Inventory Database System(WMUDS/SWAT) Database(FW)' H\Ad-Nov\W P60\7\Cm512-1-00.595 • • • Ii Petaluma River/Trail Enhancement Project • December 1, 2000 • Page 5 The appropriate publicly available files for properties that appear to have the potential to impact the project will be reviewed.- Agencies that will be contacted as appropriate include the Petaluma Fire Department,.Sonoma County Department of Environmental Health,and the Regional Water,Quality Control Board. Our level of,effort includes.review.of up to five'property files. Additional file review will be performed only with your.authorization. If remedial actions or subsurface investigations have been conducted at the parcel or adjacent-properties, Harding ESE will assess whether the parcel or adjacent properties.-have been granted'a "case closed" or "no further action"''status:, Results,of Harding ESE's assessment will be presented in the feasibility report for the undergrounding of utilitiesialong Water Street. 2. Evaluatei..Couditions The,seconditask group;is comprised of: a. .Inspection or review of all potential areas of the project; b.. Conducting soil and structural tests;when necessary. The purpose of thts'investigation will • be to characterize the subsurface,conditions along,the Petaluma River banks for stability and possible need•for slope reconfiguration+and slope protection. 'The;geotechntcal:wor•k will also'atdin the structural evaluation of the condition of the existing railroad trestle along the south bank of the river near thetutmngbasin. Subsurface evaluations will also he developed for river bank protection,grading,and undergrounding utilities. We anticipate the,scope of the subsurface exploration and-laboratory testing will include.the following: We propose to drill approximately 12 sample test borings from 5 to 60'feet in depth: ii. Representative bulk samples will be;collected along the watepstreet.pavement,. alignment arid planned bikepath`s-for laboratory testing and R-values and corrosion • potential. iii. The samples obtained from the test borings will be reexamined for.,' - verification of field classifications. Selected specimens,will be tested-for moisture content and dry density, classification(sieve analysts and Atterberg limits),.strength,R-value„and corrosion,-as appropriate.. d. Creating a site”inventory of plants;habitats,structures,and utilities,existing,facilities,;an d_ land uses; and, ■ e. Performing surveys,of all areas of the,project, where necessary. . • 419A d-N ov\WHO\7\Cor¢.I-00.495 1 ` • Petaluma River/Trail I. Enhancement Project - December 1, 2000 Page 6 3' Analyze:Data The third task group involves analyzing the data gathered in the review portion, along with the evaluation task group information.From this analysis,we will establish options,opportunities,ideas and constraints. 4. Develop Preliminary Plan; The fourth task is to createmrelirninary'plans,.master-plans and conceptual plans, recommended courses of action, and methbdology for construction based OD the previous tasks and their.results. • 5. Synthesize and Consolidate Ideas • The fifth task group would'be to synthesize and consolidateideas into final concepts and plans through review with the'City of Petaliirna„associated conirnunity groups, and affected agencies. 6. Finalize Documents-and'Implement:Project The sixth taslc group wotild invOlvetheProduction of construciiondocuments for the implementation of the project through,construction_ 'This group would include all aspects of design, project facilitation,.and.constructiommanagernent of the project. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work is'based.oil our review of,the City of Petaluma's'Requestfor Proposal, site visits and observations, as well as reading and understanding the Petaluma:River Access'and Enhancement Plan, Bicycle Plan. and-Central Petaluma':Specific Plan. Our scope of work includes our project team members' personal involvement in the."development of_some of`the documents;listed above. The project,is, in essence, a revitalization of the:Petaluma River as;a:pedestrian and bicycle travel way, connecting and unifying the town to other trail systems. Thetriver'banks and their diversity, including wildlife habitat,recreational, commercial,residential and industrial,uses,must be enhanced and revitalized to ensure.that the heart of Petaluma's identity and future economic development and viability are preserved and enharided. This revitalization planning process begins with°,the preparation ofa'conceptual design study'that connects the existing trails and potential,bike,and pedestrian paths'from Lynch-Creek and the Payran residential neighborhood to the downtown commercial center: The path will continue southward to the industrial'and residential areas alongthe river. The conceptual plan will include studies ofthe'bicycle improvements from the Lakeville Street,Bridge to"C"'Street, and,froni "C" Street to the'"D"'Street Bridge. • Additional 'connections to other primary areas will need to,be developed:as part of The Central Petaluma Specific,Plan: 1) Copeland Street to'the Transit Center,.through to the McNear peninsula; 2) connections directly to the downtown turning basis and its'surrounding boardwalks and,trail system; 3)connections to the proposed:Grove;Street Park, and,Petaluma River Walk; and 4)the corridor to Putnam Park. 01\Ad-Nov\WHO\7 Cor\I1-1-00.495 I 1 Petaluma River/Trail Enhancemen • • Decernbevl, 2000 Page 7 In addition to pedestrian and bicycle circulation,the conceptual plan will include suggestions for`signage, and interpretive centers for the historical and environmentally significant elements found along the pathways. These;concepts'and elements.will be detailedin conceptual form as,part of the plan. River,trail-heads and access pointswill be identified!and well for the level-ofrecreation use. • There are multiple trail connection options,and all must be'explored. Our conceptual plans will incorporate the studies'for`the connection:across, around or under the "D'' Street bridgefor-future'connections to the River walk southward toward the McNear Peninsula. • Our preliminary design+and conceptual studies will be refined into an agenda packet,with the coordination •of City staff, suitable forpresentation to the City Council. The heart of the'Rrver/Trail Enhancement Project is the beautification of Water Street fromEastWashington to Western Avenue. • With the structural evaluation of the existing railroad trestle,the City should consider the structural evaluation of the bank as:it continues north past the Washington St,Bridge. The integrity of the trestle is important for the viability of the trolley,but is a moot evaluation.without a structurally sound approach on the•north side' of the East Wasshington:Street bridge, as well There will be a plan,,associated life span expectation statement, costs for the new trestle, and an associated cost and information packet•prepareA for the City Council. • • As a follow upto the trestle.evaluation and.reconstruction plan, we,will-include three beautification plans developed for Water Street. East Washington to western Avenue. These plans will incorporate the connections to the other optional trails and potentialefuture developments,around the turning.basin. As part plan, we will incorporate new;parking,,vehicle?access, pedestrian and.bicycle•access planters decorative railings,access to businesses,historic street lighting,and the repaving:of Water Street. 1 _ The;undergrounding of all utilities would a.vital part,of the beautification'effort. Our work=will=,include a study conducted and with P.G&E., the•associated Rule 20A,Land•the,funding; The focus of the prof ect's beautification will maintain the architectural diversity,'spanning from the Victorian through the industrial,ao'.the agrarian.flavor,that•keeps Petaluma a diverse and interesting.community. Pedestrian; access'to, the river's trails, and business and commercial center along its routes will be incorporated to allow freedom'of movement for,residents, recreational users, tourists•and'business-people, The conceptual design•packet will be prepared in coordination with^City staff and'will be presented to the City Council for'ifs•review'and;approval. All phases of the project will include other tasks and functions beyond the 'design intent and its implementationy<Right-of--way research andplans will need to be produced. Appraisals and acquisitions'of rights-of way will need to be completed. • • • H:W d-Nov\W P 60 V,C or\12-1.00495 • • i,v At Petaluma River/Trail my Enhancement Proj ect. Decetnber'd, 20'00 Page 8 . At the completion of each phase,cost,estimates.will be°prepared. Plans nd;specifications will be prepared for distribution to qualified contractors for bidding purposes. All bidding and contractor correspondence will be coordinated during the biddingprocess. AMPLIFICATION OF THE:SCOPE'OF'W ORK/INNOVATIVE IDEAS The River Trail from.Lynch Creek'to Lakeville to "C" Street will examine several possible routes for its completion. At the terminus of Madison Street, there are many opportunities for trail.routes.and future connections to the transit center, andithe river corridor. It may be possible to-alien`the River Trail with the east bank:of the creek, past Copeland Street, and,around the grain'building to'the East Washington Street bridge. There is an opportunity for some of the cost of this portion to be offset by the development of a ' proposed housing project adjacent to East Washington Streef and"the Petaluma River. • At the intersection of.Copeland and Madison Streets, there is a great opportunity for a river crossing pedestrian bridge. This,bridge could'be combined with the raising the utility:lines crossing.the ever at this location. The utilities could be suspended beneath the bodge, above:the 100-year storm level,preventing a hydraulic bottleneck This option, while morecostly provides some-opportunities. The bride"would cross two Ci properties where people currently cross the river. It also opens the ' _ opportunity for the northwest bank of the river to be developed into an extension of the Water Street beautification. This portion of the river is currently a blend of industrial and vacant land. This blend could be further•enhanced:and improved for active:and passive:recreational.activities, as well as providing an entirely new avenue for commerce:and series of store fronts for the;,current properties. Routing the path through the,current properties could be quite costly: However,the increased commercial potential would be of great value. Cities such,as Portland, Oregon,`San:Antonio, Texas, and St. Louis, Missouri have developed',greatavenues of commerce along river-ways, without vehicle access. The existing railroad right-of-waycould be acquired{and used-for the trolley,bicycle,and pedestrians. This would provide the possibility of providing small,distinct access points to theriver,while leaving the majority of,the bank in this area as wildlife habitat. This would eliminate many acquisition costs by utilizing the existing,.established right-of-way and eliminating the costly junsdictional;constraints'and requirements. The prospect for a.pedestrian and'ibicycle street crossing at:the East Washington Street bridge will require close'study. Safety measures, such as signaling,:gates,lights,or:warning would need to be installed to allow safe passage for-bicyclists and pedestrians. With the possible restrictions,costs,and'constraints of river bank development,'.it maybe necessary to look at'a variety of Pinions fer'crossing EastWashington Street. A unique idea is to.create,a--floating.concrete walk and bikeway,.similar`to-the existing docks at.the turning basin and trestle., This:dock would ramp down from the river bank and follow its course under the East Washington Street bridge. Spiral staircases for pedestrians could connect at both sides of the bridge. The travel-way would connect at the existing dock; and ramp backup the bank onto:City property,just beyond • -the Petaluma Yacht Club. This would enable the City to bypass many land acquisitions and bureaucratic ' hassles, while,creattng a:unique and direct.path:into the heart of downtown Further study of this option would be needed: . H',\Ad-Nov\WP6017\Cur 2-1-00495 . - • r • • 'Ai . ..,._ • • . - . . . . ■ a', --- w ,...1 •F- ;r4 ,4c.i vti —, 0 - . . . . . _ . • . . . ,. . . . . • !>:. .-i.:::>:,...1=. ,.. . " --.::::::::•:.,;::•.. ... .... . . . . . . . . . 0: . . . . 1 lc; PETALUMARIUER, BICYCLE / PEDSTRIAN TRAIL ENHANCEMENT COMMUNICATION/ ORGANIZATIONAL FLOW CHART Cit •of Petaluma (Engineering -r Dennis-D. Rinehart (Principal) Project Manager/ Facilitator A r ♦" V Gregg,Gruoin John Fitzgerald J.T.Wick.;. Steve.Arago 4-■ - ---��—j 4--) (Principal) Lead Structural Engineer Lead Civil Engineer Lead Land Planner Landscape Architect ,l • 1 • Gina Benedetti-Petnic 'Civil Staff. Ted W.Spores • -Structural Designer -Designer - Planning Staff Landscape Designer .1.. • A • Structural Staff R.W... Davis&Associates;, Landscape`Staff Designers/Technicians Land:Surveyor Designers/Technicians Hardin 'ESE • 9_._._. I Geptech./Biology/' • Hazardous Materials I • Nor-Coast Utility Design. Utility/Joint Trench- I Archaeological Resources Archaeological/ I - • Architectural Research I • G.F. Hornsby'&Associates �l Real Estate'Appraisals&-` • A Re Right-of-Way s Research Additional'Consultant Team.Members • „ ., • • _ . :. . -St . . . . . 1.• • 1.• .0: tsi-LL p • . , • • • • • . . It 1.1.°) 11 H rfi 1 1r, III h ! it b i 0 U u Proposed-Key Personnel Dennis Rinehart- Project manager Steven Arago —Senior Landscape Architect John:Fitzgerald- Civil Engineer Don Curry- Senior Engineering Designer_ J.T. Wick- Planner Gregg Grubin- Structpral'Engineer Ted Spores- Landscape Designer All key members of our technical design team were selected for there extensive knowledge, backgrounds, and expertise. Many of our:team members are Petaluma { residents and many have been involved in the evolution of our town. All qualifications, references, and-associated projects,_can:be found in the resume section of this proposal. Any further references are available on request. • PETALUMA RIVER BICYCLE/ PEDSTRIAN TRAIL ENHANCEMENT COMMUNICATION /;ORGANIZATIONAL FLOW CHART • City of Petaluma v Engineering i Dennis.0.Rinehart (Principal) Protect Manager/ Padlltator Gregg Grubin. JohnFi @geraltl - J.T.Wmk SteveAhagg. y �—� Landscape pap Lead Structural Engineer Lead Civil Engineer Lead Lana Planner Landscape Architect T _ T Gina Benedetti-Perm Civil Staff. Planning3tzff Ted W,Scores • Structural Designer Designer . Landscape.Deaigner • A Structural Staff RW.Davis&Asscclates Landscape.Staff • Designers/Technicians Land.Surveyor Designersl technicians • • Ali:, ••'sr,•1: • • • • • A • .. • ya, • GS, / J [St12 790 DeLong Avenue, Novato, California 94945 L l (415).8924763 FAX: (415) 892 4502 CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, Inc. AL CORNWELL Principal-in-Charge Education: Stanford University -Palo Alto—M.S. -Civil Engineering 1972 Stanford University-Palo Alto—B.S. - Civil Engineering 1972 Registration: Civil Engineer-.California R.C.E. #27577 General-Contractor- California 4368026 Experience: As president of CSW/Stuber-Stroeh, Mr. Cornwell is;responsible.for over-all project administration and technical review. With morethan 25 years of professionaVexperience,Al also lends his expertise to managing specific proj ects He has designed,secured entitlements for,and managed construction of major commercial,residential,institutional,and military base reuse projects. Al is also a licensed General Contractor in the State of California,with five years of experience in supervising and estimating construction • projects. This combination of design.andtonstruction perspectives allows him to bring a unique and valuable insight to civil engineering projects. Memberships: • Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors-of California (CELSOC) • American Concrete Institute Representative Projects: • 1. Fourth Street Improvements.—San Rafael Enhancement of a main downtown sheet in San Rafael ' This project included street resurfacing;sidewalk widening traffic calming textured plazas, seating, tree planting landscaping outdoor eating areas; and lighting/outloorpower. Prepared conceptual plans, cost estimates, and construction documents. . 2. Fair,Isaac.ISan.Rafael Corporate Center--.San Rafael: This project involved rebuilding Lindaro Street, with wider sidewalks and special pedestrian mid;block crossings, as well as site improvements of underground utilities including water sewer powe; gas, and communications. Prepared'conceptual:plans, design development; cost,estimates,and construction:documents. 3. Sears Point International Raceway—Sonoma: New enhancements for track,and fanseating. Project included widening Highways 37 and 121, and intersectionsimprovements, new water and sewer systems, erosion control,, and water quality improvements. Prepared preliminary plans, cost estimates, construction documents, and provided construction coordination. H:' d-NoNweaan\cord 12-1-00.495 • cI LSti2 790 DeLong Avenue, Novato, California 94945 • L l J (415) 8924763 FAX: (415) 892 4502 CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, Inc. DENNIS D. RINEHART Project Manager Education: University of California -Davis—B.S. -CivilEngineering, 1976 Registration: Civil Engineer- California R.C.E. #32110 Experience: Mr. Rinehart has,more than 25 years of design and.project management experience in Northern California. His experience,includes,a wide variety of civil:engineering,projects, such as drainage systems, sanitary sewer,systems,water delivery systems, and roadway design. Dennis also possesses the technical expertise required for project management of survey operations. This expertise has led to his involvement in institution, commercial,,industrial, and residential projects., Mr. Rinehart's background and experience have made him a valuable ally to.the Town of Yountville, and • the City of Suisun City for providing assistance in plan checking and other professional services needed by the staffs of these municipalities. Representative Projects: - 1. Suisun Plaza--Suisun City,California: Redesign for revitalization and conversion of a typical city commercial street to a commercial plaza with upgraded paving concrete work street furniture,and interaction with the existing Amtrak-train station and Suisun.City:Harbor. Prepared conceptual layout, grading, and drainage plans. ' 2. Yount Street--'Yountville. California: Design and project construction management for 1±mile reconstruction of city street in a destinati on/residentialcommuni_ty. Prepared conceptual andfinal design drawings for-pavement-reconstruction; bridge/culvert replacement; upgraded sidewalks, street signs, and lighting;sewer; water,.and storm dram;replacement. 3. McNear Landing; River Park Design—Petaluma,.California( Prepared final design drawings for grading drainage and ADA access to river walk along Petaluma River. Project also included construction maitagement and observation of structural retaining wall construction, as well as preparation of as-built drawings for all constructed fadill ties. • • H:\A d-Nav\W P60\7\Con\12-1-00 495 • CJW / S 2 • • [ 790 DeLong Avenue,Novato, California 94945 L J (415) 892.4763 FAX: (415) 892-4502 • CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, Inc. STEVEN A. ARAGO Landscape Architect- Education: University of Californian—Berkeley-Landscape Architecture 1973 Registration: Landscape Architect-,California R.L.A. #1687 Experience: Steven has more than/28 years of professional experience with planning and design projects throughout the-States of California and Nevada. He has worked on projects ranging small, single family residential designs to large thirty thousand acre land use planning projects. Within that range, Steve has worked . on commercial, institutional;recreational,multi-unit residential,urban design,and large single family detached residential developments. Steve's professionalbackgrouhdallows him to provide clients with the ability.to conceptualize plans,then refine those plans into improvement plans. Those plans can include land use plans,site development plans,master plans, grading&drainage plans,landscape plans,hardscape plans and detailed concept sketches: He is very experienced in presenting plans to public boards,;councils, comnussions, task forces and comimttees on behalf of clients. Community involvement has'also:beeri amajor component to Steve's professional life. He has served on the City of Petaluma's Recreation,Music&Parks Commission since 1994. As an auxiliary'connnissionassignment,Steve also serves on the City's Tree Advisory Committee, which oversees the planting and maintenance of trees on public property. Memberships: • American Society of Landscape Architects • City of Petaluma Recreation, Music and Parks Comnvssion;(PastChair) Representative Projects: Nellen Avenue Connector—Corte Madera,California: Project included preparation ofpreliminaryand final-design landscape plans for-new connector street between„Tamer Vista Boulevard and redwood Highway. In addition to landscape plans, which included trees, shrubs;,ground cover and an irrigation system,project included,aiinearldering concrete walkway foruse by pedestrians and bicyclists. 2. Pigott Meinoiial Corridor.—.Seattle.-Washington: This project'consisted of preparation ofpreliminary and final design plans for a pathway meandering down from-Hospital Hill to the existing Freeway Park, . built over the top of Interstate 5 in downtown Seattle The design featured a meandering, handicap- accessible pathway,featuring several cascading waterfalls located at prominent focal points along the route Landscaping was provided outside the perimeter,of the structure; as well as in planter boxes incorporated into pathway-walls. • 3. Mahon Creek Path—:San Rafael, California: Preliminary and final design plans were prepared for this multi-user pathway in pentrof San Rafael, connecting.Albert Park to,Francisco Boulevard. Plans included grading&drainage plans,plantingplans, utility plans and irrigation plans. Sitting areas with benches were provided at several locations along the path. This project is currently under construction. H:Nd-Nov\W P6o0\Cor\12-1-00,495 a •, awl . • g Avenue, Novato, California 94945 [St]2 790 DeLon(415) 892-4763 FAX: (411) 892-4502 CSW/Stuber-Stroeh.Engineering Group, Inc.. TED SPORES Landscape Designer Education: University of California.,Berkeley- Landscape Architecture (Certificate) 1992 Experience: Mr. Spores has worked in the field ofLandscape Architecture for the past 5 years. Prior to working,as a Landscape Architect„Ted worked for 4 years as a,Land'scape Estimator; supervisor, and garden designer. He also spent-8 years,as+-an irrigation designer: Since joining CSW/St2 in 1998, Ted has been worked on many large projects. Ted's skills includelandscape architectural planning,landscape and planting design. He has extensive knowledge of the design and implementationof hardscapes planting, irrigation,structures, etc., as well as layout, drainage, grading, specifications, contract administration,and'construction management. • Representative Projects: 1. Park-Ridge Subdivision: Active Parlcs, Country Club Vista Park--Richmond, California: • Country Club Vista Park.: This is a 6 acre.park with baseball and soccer facilities. Design elements include a pedestrian promenade, public patio; .playground and planting design. Prepared construction(details,provided construction administration. This park is part of an "emerald necklace.”of parks, bicycle, and pedestrian,paths in which Ted played a significant role in implementing: • Active Park I A 2'acre park with basketball facilities,turf area planting and a dynamic group patio area and playground; Linked with unique overhead'structures. 2. Cypress Lawn+Lakeside Park-BART Right-of-WayDeveldpment–:Colma.California: Developed preliminary master plan incorporating a private park like setting incorporating a pathway system, ;a seating amphitheater,fountain pavilion, road layout,planting.grading;lighting,etc. All elements S{I coming together with an emphasis on preserving views, architectural vernacular planting theme, and historical design intent The project is currently in the:construction document phase. 3. East Washington Street/McDowell Boulevard Beautification ,-,,Petaluma. California: Conceptual designforbeautification,paving,structures,plantingskettehes,renderings;presentation,preliminary cost estimates. P-roject,is currently-imthe construction documentphase. Other: Dog Park–Novato,California Dog park facility planting 'irrigation,parking paving equestrian pathway, drainage, grading and cost estimate. • Greenwood:Beach Wetlands Mitigation:and Monitoring Plan - Tiburon, California • St. Vincent De Pan] Church—Petaluma;California: Planting and irrigation design. • H:\Ad-Nov\WP6QV\Car\I?-1-00495 • CSW/ [St]2 790 DeLong Avenue, Novato; California.94945 L J (415) 892-4763 FAX: (415)892-4502 CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering.Group, Inc. DON CURRY Senior Designer Education: Marin Community College- Kentfield-Civil Engineering 1967 -i. { Experience: Mr. Curry has over 30,years of experience in design and construction in the field of water management and pipeline rehabilitation. Fore.more than 20 years, Don worked for the Mann Municipal Water District,completing designs for access roads,pipelines,pumping facilities, storage tanks and water distributionsystetns. • Since joining CSW/St2 in January, 1990, Don has been designing water systems for the City of San Rafael, Holy Cross and Mount Olivet Cemeteries, Hamilton Air Force Base Reuse, and many residential subdivisions throughout the'San Francisco Bay Area Mr: Curry's background and 0 experience provide him;with the knowledge required for developing creative and effective solutions to a vast array of pipeline and roadway rehabilitation and new facilities installations. Memberships: • American Water Works Association!'(AWWA) • Bay Area Water Works Association • Construction Specifications°Institute • Representative Projects: { 1. Fourth Street Sidewalk Improvements - San Rafael; California: Design and project management for replacement of seven downtown city blocks of sidewalks, curb and gutter, drainage systems, lighting, and landscape improvements. 2. Second Street Widening- San Rafael, California: Design and project management for the widening of 0 3-±of mile of roadwaythat included foup,major intersections and a portion of a highway on-ramp. Included sidewalks, curb'and gutter,drainage systems, lighting and utility undergrounding. 3. San Ansehno2000Streetscape Improvements-San Anselnio,.California: Developed survey and layout of San Anselmo Avenue=iinprovenents:whichl,included replacement of portions 0 of sidewalk, curb/gutter and drainage systems. Also; included replacement of street lights and installation of new tree wells. Portion of project was federally funded. R\Ad-Nov\WP60\7\Car\1?-1-0D495 1 . �. 1 K M., 5` , _ & . I SW" W [StP: . /• 7. HICK- EDUCATION To J. D. - School of Law . 'Golden Gate University-^San,Francisco, California 1986 B. A. - Political Science 'University of California Santa Barbara 1982 ,ct REGISTRATION . � ��TT ��1 American Institute.ofCertified Planners A.I.C.P. #10447 F� PROFESSIONAL..EXPERIENCE. HMr. Wick has a wide range of experience inland use and landSplanning: His responsibilities at CSW/St2 include management of residential, commercial and industrial projects through design and entitlement, public agency representation and environmental review for public and private projects. Before joining CSW/Stuber-Stroeh in 1996, J T. worked as a principal planner, for. the Marin County Community Development Agency for 10.years. He?has also worked1as a planning consultant_for both public agencies • and private developers. J.T., developstarid manages residential properties in Northern California and Texas as a partner in a private company. . MEMBERSHIPS • American Planning Association(APA) d' in • Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce - President cm it CA • Redwood Empire Chinese?Cultural Association -Building Committee • City of Petaluma Planning Coma ission(1994- 1997) U ii E REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS z 1 il . Park Central^ Petaluma, California 0 ,` • Redwood Technology Center- Petaluma, California. u . Central Petaluma'Specific'Plan - Petaluma, California a • Marin Coast Golf Ranch - Valley Ford,.California `.n . • Mountain Gate Subdivision Mill Valley, California c . Waldo Point Harbor Houseboat Marina-:Master Plan -4 Sausalito, California • Chapel Cove Subdivision .V Sari Rafael, California c . Point Reyes Commons - Point Reyes Station, California b d ID co co - - sir • CSW/STUBR STROEH ENGINEERING,GROUP, INC. 1113� r . s - 1 • Cs w/ • r 2 790 DeLong Avenue,Novato, California 94945 L�*�� (1415).892-4763 FAX: (415) 8924502 CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, Inc. • GREGG GRUBIN Structural Engineer • Education: University of Colorado -Boulder—M.S. Structural Engineering 1986 .'.,I University of Colorado-Boulder—B.S. -Architectural Engineering 1984 Registration: Structural Engineer- California R.S.E. #4312 Civil Engineer= California R.C.E. #52319 Experience: Mr.Grubin has more than 14 years of experience working in the fields of consulting and structural engineering: His experience includesthe,design of concrete,steel,masonry,and timber buildings and structures, including static, dynamic,,linear; and non-linear,design of new structures: Gregg has also worked on the analysis of existing;structures;for seismic studies and retrofit;projects, including non-linear "push-over"analysis techniques. His retrofit design experience encompasses existing bridges;commercial, • industrial, and residential structuresand;buildings. • Prior to joining CSW/St2-in 1998,.Gregg spent nearly 7 years working-for a consulting civil and structural engineering firm headquartered in San Jose, California. He worked on several major commercial and industrial projects throughout Northern California during his tenure there. Representative Projects: 1. CALTRANS Local Agency Retrofit Projects :(1996=1998); Seismic: retrofit evaluations and construction documentation for steel, timber, and concrete bridges, including: SFIA viaduct, San Lorenzo River Bridge; and Eel River Bridge. Contact Jim Accinelli,Consultant Contract Manager-California Department of Transportation Phone: .(916)445-7424' 2. Evaluation of City of Larkspur Bridges(1998-Present) Larkspur This project involved structural evaluation of the Doherty Drive Bridge, Bon Air Bridge, andAlexaniler Drive (Historical)Bridge for the City of Larkspur: Contact: Hamid Shamsapour,P.E., Director of Public Works- City of Larkspur Phone: (415) 927-5020 3. Evaluation of Pier 33OutfaliStructure.(1996-199.7)—San Francisco: Observation and structural evaluation,of 36"diameter°sloop-water outfall for-the City of San Francisco, including corrosion protection design of undePwkter.piers. • Contact: Dan Horn, P.E., Engineering Manager-City of San Francisco Bureau of Engineering Phone: 015)558-6060 H:\Ad-Nov\W P 60 V 1Co r\121-00 495 1 7.•• • • • (-6?, z oi e; . . • 1111 • 11 11 r---: , . . • . w • • • • �� .W / I [st]2 790 DeLong Avenue; Novato California 94945 (415) 892=4763 FAX: (415) 892-4502 CSW/Stuber-Stroeh.Erigineering Group, Inc. JOHN FITZGERALD Civil Engineer Education: San Francisco,State University Healds Engineering College . Registration: Civil Engineer- California R.C.E. #32999 Land'Surveyor- California R.L.S. #4419 Experience: Mr. FitzGerald'hasmore than 29 years of professional experience,including nine years in the public sector:working for the cities of Corte'Madera,Sebastopol,and'Cotati. Since 1979,John has,owned and operated FitzGerald &Associates,:a consulting land surveying and civil engineering firm located in Petaluma. Services include: cadastral, topographic control,!and construction surveys, commercial and residential grading and drainage plans; and subdrviszon design•andprocessing. 1 • Memberships: • California Land Surveyors Association • • American Society of Civil Engmeers • National Society of Professional'Surveyors • American Congress oh!Surveying•and Mapping Professional Activities: . Petaluma City Council Appointed Member Petaluma River Access andEnhancement Plan Committee- 1990 to 1995 . Petaluma City Council Appointed Member: Petaluma Central Specific Plan Committee-1997toPresent "' Petaluma City Council Appointed Member: Petaluma Par/&&Recreation Commission- 1995 to 1999 . Representative Projects: . 1. Wiseman Park - Petaluma Airport -- Petaluma:' Prince,Park 5icycle;and pedestrian path. Provided • grading and drainage plan for 0^7 mile inter facility bicycle and pedestrian pails. . 2. U.S.Corps ofEngineers/City-Flood Control Project--Petaluma: Provided preparation of easement legal i descriptions for over-70 properties along this 3,500 footlong project. 3. B' Street Storm Drain System Petaluma: Provided:map preparation of plans and construction • inspec$on for 3,200 foot section of Master Plan Storm Drain; PI\A d-Nov\W P60\?\Car\12-1-00 095 1 I 1 • I . • Keith H Bergman, P.E. , pal Engineer Experience Mt.r Bergman has over 35 years.ofexperience in construction and geotechnical engineering. He specializes in geotechnical engineering for . - industrial, commercial, educational,and Hospital:structures, as well as site grading,;landslide;repair, dams and levees, and waterfront projects. Registration and Civil Engineer-.California 1964,No. C 1'5005 Certification GeotechnicalEngineer--California 1987, No.'GE 140 Professional;Engineer- Illinois 1982 No.-062-039923; Missouri 1982, No. EN?020361 •Education M. S., Civil`EiIgineering (Geotechnical), University of California,Berkeley, 1959 B.S., Civil"Engineering, Michigan Technological University,Houghton, Michigan, 1953 Representative Projects Infrastructure. Mahon Creek:Bank Reconfiguration and'Bike/Pedestrian Path Project, San Rafael, California—Geotechnical Manager for the development of geotechnical design criteria,for reconfiguration of a reach of Mahon Creek and;establisliment of a bike/pedestrian Path along Mahon Creek. Involved in the coordination with concurrent environmental investigation. Client City of San Rafael Department of Public Works Second;Street'Widening,,San Rafael, California- Geotechnical Project Manager for widening of,Second Street in very congested section of downtown San Rafael. Portions of widening were located in shallow contaminated-fill over soft bay mud. Also section of widening was located close to Mahon°Creek,which:required'.slope stability analysis and design of sheet pile or drilled pier wall along-the Creek. Client CSW/Stuber-Stroeh . and City.ofSan`Rafael • Bellam Boulevard and East Francisco Boulevard Intersection Improvements, San Rafael, California=-Presently performing+geotechnical services for design'of Widening and additional`,tum"lane improvements at intersection and on ramp to Interstate I-580 freeway which>requires conformance with Caltrans standards. Client K.-Miley-Hera and Associates.and City of San Rafael • Wastewater Treatment Plant Modifications, Petaluma, California - • Geotechnicalaproject manager for preliminary investigations for modifications to an'existing treatment facility that included filling existing `oxidation ponds, constructingiseveral new:structures, construction a new 'Harding ESE, Inc., • Keith H. Bergman - Page2 reservoir to store treated wastewater by building a 90-foot-high earth dam and three saddle dams: ,The site of theproposed buildings Is partially • underlain bay mud, requiring deep foundations and/or a wick drain and surcharge program to reduce post construction differential settlements. Client: City of Petaluma c/o Brown and Caldwell Consiultants Geotechnnical Investigations, Petaluma Plaza Shopping Centers,Petaluma, California—Project engineer for geotechnical investigation and services. during construction of.Petaluma Plaza and Plaza North_Shopping Centers on McDowell Boulevard north of East Washington Street in Petaluma. Project required imported fill building''pads and special design features for,roadway . and parking lot to inhibit the shrink smelltendencies:of the surface expansive "adobe"clays present at both sites. 'Client: Garrison Pacific Properties Novato Creek Bridge,lVlarin County, California Project.consultant on geotechnical design and construction of pile-supported reinforced concrete bridge'over Novato.Cr eek. Included extensive instrumentation of a_butment, approach fills to monitor settlement and lateral movement Client: C apital' Properties Wastewater Treatment Plant,Lemoore Naval Air Station;Lemoore, California-Geotechrncal project manager for,geotechnical investigation for 240,000-gallon storage tank, containment dikes, and'related structures and piping Client: U.S. Navy 500,000-gallon water.tank,Naval Postgraduate School,Monterey; California-Project manager for geotechnical investigation for fire protection facility. Client: U.S;Navy Concrete Tank Reservoir Replacement,Daly City, California—Project -manager for geotechnical investigations and services during reconstruction of a large`concrete water tank located on a hilltop above'Daly City: Required grading of steep Slope-for construction of a protective earth berm. Client: City of Daly • Novato Bypass Pipeline,Novato, California—Project manager for geotechnical investigation for route selection•of a bypass pipeline and a . Phase II geotechnical investigation and'ei gineering:analyses to provide conclusions and recommendations with.respect to subsurface conditions; settlement estimates; recommendation for trenching;and backfilling, recommendations for pipe jacking under the,highway,and railroad tracks. Also provided consultation during-the 5-mile long construction. Client; Marin Municipal Water District Structures • George Moscone'Elementary School, San Francisco, California-Project consultant;for geotechnical'and geologic hazards investigation Tor for a new elementary school and child care center. Project included two new two Harding ESE, Inc. .• Keith H.:Bergman -Page 3 , 0 story school buildings and a new,1,',1/2-story parking garage with the lower level below,grade. Provided geotechmcal recommendations'for spread . footings, drilled'piers,;ground,anch'ors, old;fill removal,groundwater control, shoring,and underpinning: Client: San Francisco Unified School.District New John—O'Connell—High School, San Francisco, California -Project consultant geotechnical and geologic hazards-investigation-for a new • .-school to be.built on the site of an'existing school in a dense urban area The project included six, ones totfour story buildings. Provided recommendations for spread footings, basement.wall design, groundwater 'control,,settlement mitigation, shoring, and underpinning. Client: San • Eraiidiseb Unified SchOOl!Di t Rt One Embarcadero South, San Francisco;California-Project manager for geotechnical investigation for 13-story.apartment building near San Francisco Bay. Subsurface conditions across the site ranged from bedrock at the surface to over 401feet of fill and soft,baymud. Driven pile foundations were required.`to support the,building through contaminated-upper fill zone, bay and into firm soil or bedrock: Client' Urban West,Inc. Laguna Towers, San Francisco, California - Project engineer for geotechnical;investigation and construction observation-for 20-story residential,condohiinium on LagunaStreet. Client: Laguna Towers • Santa Rosa 'Junior College, Santa Rosa,.California-Project manager geotechnical investigation and construction;servrces for several campus • projects,.including the Plover'Library, Lark:Hall, and addition to Shuhaw Hall. °Sonoma:CountrGeneral:Hospital;.Santa Rosa, California-Project manager for geotechnical-investigation and,:construction services for additions to hospital near/die active traces of the Rodgers Creek fault. Client: Sonoma County Exchange Bank,:Santa Rosa, California- Project manager for geotechnical • investigation;and construction services for 5-storypile-supported structure with basement.. Client' Exchange Baik• Santa RosaMemorialHospital Additions, Santa Rosa, California - Project manager for geotechnical investigation'for multi-story addition to existing hospital. Client: Stone Marraccini Patterson ' 'Five=stoiy.,office;building;,San`Rafael, California- Project engineer on foundation'investigation„for:steel-framed`inuilti-story office building. Included evaluation ofstabilit of high adjacent.cut slope. Skilled'Nursing Facility,San Rafael, California- Geotechnical engineering • consultant-on=investigation and construction-of three-story nursing facility at Smith Ranch Retirement Community. Client: 'Tishman/Speyer Corporation Harding.ESE,,Inc. ' • ?'I Keith H. Bergman --Page 4 Balboa High School renovations, San Francisco, California -Performed geologichazards•evaluation of school site Loose sands were found subject' • to.liquefaction. Program of,chemical<grouting of sands wasper-formed•to • provide suitable.support,to the existing foundations. Client`. San Francisco Unified,SchoolDistrict Dams Camp Far West Dam;,_Beark'iver, northern California.- Geotecli heal engineering consultant for liquefaction-potential analysis of foundation for existing 185-foot high:embankment dam. Included test borings, geophysical downhole and crosshole shear wave determinations, laboratory testing, re-evaluation'''of design;earthquake, stability'and deformation analyses. _ Client: South:Sutter'WaterDistrict:and Parsons Brinckerhoff,Quade:& Douglas Rock Creek No 2 hydroelectric,project, Butte:County,California- Geotechnical project manager for feasibility studies, FERC licensing:and final design. Included:80-foot high concrete diversion-dam, tunnel, penstock,and powerhouse. Client: Kaiser Engineers-a id Oroville- Wyandotte litigation District Amador County.Prison Wastewater Retention Dam,lone, California- Project manager for investigation, design,.and.construction inspection of • embankment;dam for.retention of wastewater. Client: Kennedy/Jenks/ • Chilton Engineers NCPA Reservoir Dam,The Geysers, Sonoma County, California- • Geotechnical project manager for preliminary investigation and design of „embankment'or roller-compacted,concrete dam•forstorage of injection water-, Included preliminary construction cost estimate. Client Northern California Power Agency Conn Creek Dam,Napa County, California- Project.manager:::for seismic stability evaluation and deformation analysis of existing,125 foot-high, `" embankment,dam. Investigation included liquefaction potential evaluation of,alluvium left in foundation"area and of downstream granular,shell. Client; City ofNapa• Rio Bravo hydroelectric project,near Bakersfield;California,- Geotechnical project manager for feasibility studies and:FERC licensing, and:final;design and construction. Project=-includes low concrete diversion dam, 8000-foot long concrete power canal, penstock, and 14-MW powerhouse. Client: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade &vDouglas Lake Curry Dam,Solano.County, California - Project consultant during seismic:stability evaluation and deformation analysis of existing 100-foot- 1 high-embankment;damrnear active traces of Green Valley and Antioch:faults. Client City of Vallejo • Harding ESE, Inc; • _ - ._ ... Keith H._Bergman -Page 5 410 Big,Sulphur Creek Dam,;Sonoma County, California-Engineering project manager for`'s"ite=selection, feasibilitytstudy,=and preliminary design of planned 120-foot-high concrete-thin arch,dam. 'Client: Union Geothermal Trampas Canyon tailings retention dam, Orange County, California-Project manager-for design,and construction of 185-foot-high earth dam built to retain slimes from glass-sand mining operation. Project required strict pollution and seepage controls due:to'chemical nature of slimes; also required dynamic finite element analysis to check stability.and deformations under earthquake forces. Client ;Owens-Illinois, Inc. Lake Mathews Dam, Riverside'County, California-Project manager for seismic stability evaluation,.including=deformation analysis, of existing 230-foot-high earth dam and,auxiliary;dikes. Project included evaluation of existing embankment instrumentation and geotechnical investigation for new 5-MW underground powerhouse. Client:' The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Project manager and quality control.reviewer for safety,evaluations of 20 storage or diversion dams in Colorado,Utah, Arizona, Kansas, California, Idaho, and Washington as part of SEED program: Evaluations included 710-foot-high Glen Canyon concrete arch dam on Colorado River. Client: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau:of Reclamation • Ice Harbor Dam, Snake River,Pasco Washington -Construction engineer for dam complex consisting of concrete gravity dam with wing embankment dams,powerhouse,-lock, andogee spill`waywith large tainter gates. 'Performed'with-previous employer. French Creek hydroelectric project,-North Fork Feather River, northern California-Project manager for'feasibility study and FERC licensing. Project includes low concrete diversion dam, 4000-foot tunnel, penstock, and powerhouse. Client: Kaiser Engineers;and Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District Project consultant for Phase 1 safety inspections of 13 earth dams in Hawaii, 6 earth dams in Utah,,and 11 earth damseinNevada. Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and-State.of Utah' Lake Edwards Dams,Oakland, California-As project manager,performed seismic stability investigation of two 40-foot-high earthfill dams constructed around 1900'near active Hayward fault. Client Mountain.View Cemetery Association Sonoma County Wastewater Dams,.Sonoma County- Geotechnical project engineer'for.reservoir site feasibility study. Included preliminary evaluation of numerous reservoir sitesand associated dams to store wastewater for local • agricultural uses. Client: Koretsky=King-Associates'(now A-N West) for the County of Sonoma Harding ESE, Inc. • Keith H. Bergman - Page 6 Mast Dam, L`aytonville, California Project engineer for investigation and rehabilitation oft existing 70-foot-highvearth dam. Developed recommenda- tions for reconstruction-of part of upstream slope and-unique internal plastic membrane ft*permanent;seepage control. Client:' Mr: Ben Mast Project manager,for testing and construction inspection of three earth starter dams to retainjead-mine tailings, in Bixby, Salem, and Ellington,Missouri. Client: Arthur,G. McKee Company Project manager during-seismic stability''evaluation of Seneca Dam and Reservoir, located close to trace of active Hayward fault Client: East Bay Municipal Utility District Duck Creek Dam, near Peoria,Illinois- Served as project consultant during stability and,seepage,investigation of existing 125-foot-high earth,dam that retains cooling-:„Water reservoir. Client: Central Illinois Light Company Bell Canyon Dam, St.Helena, California -Project manager for safety evaluation of:100-foot-high_,earth dam. Investigation`included test,borings,; laboratory testing, and installation ry ng e, on of piezometers.to monitor performance. Recommendations for chemical grouting to inhibit seepage were carried out successfully. Client: City of St.Helena New Melones Dam, Jamestown, California- As projectmanager, provided. • consultation and stability analysis for 120-foot-high cofferdam for 625-foot- high earth- and rock-fill damubuilt for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Client: Guy F. AtkibsomCorripany Project consultant during design of Manhattan tailings,retention^dam, 100-foot-high zoned-earth�damto retain slimes from gold mining operations. :Client: 'Houston Oil and Minerals, Inc. Waste and water retention ponds, various locations-Project manager for design and construction inspection of projects involving;earthwork • construction and installation of clay-blanket liners'and other impervious liners such as soil cement,:PVC, and polyethylene. Waterfront Prudhoe Bay Waterflood Project, Prudhoe Bay,Alaska,- Geotechuical project manager during investigation, deesign,--,and construction of 4000-foot gravel causeway`and protective berm extending into Beaufort Sea for water processing facility Client: Bechtel Petroleum and ARCO Gas and Oil Company Marina and land reclamation, San Rafael, California- Project engineer for hydraulic dredge excavation and fill placement. Client: Marin Yacht Club Harding'ESE, Inc. • - Keith H. Bergman - Page 7 • • Project manager during'feasibility study for proposed shoreline park and marina fry marshland adjacent to?San Francisco Bay, Santa Clara County, California. 'Client: Sant&Clafa County Marina site Emeryville, California=As,project manager, conducted field investigation and.analyses regarding sources of dredged-fill materials. Client City of Emeryville Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, California- Project manager for evaluation anduse of reclaimed dredged spoils for building foundation support.,Client: U.S.Navy Black Point'-Development,Novat'o, California:Project engineer for earth structure design and hydraulic-dredge filling,for residential development on reclaiied-marshland., Client: Alameda,Homes, Inc. Site"Grading and Landslide Repair Proposed community development, Marin,County,California- Provided soil engineering design and inspection of rough grading of portions of 2 miles of access:roadway;in rugged terrain: project required landslide Tepair, buttressing, and surface:andSubsurface drainage. Client: Frouge Corporation • Terra Lmda'Subdivision, San Rafael, California-Designed and provided constructioniinspection of extensive landslide repair and subdrainage installation required for mass'grading ig of residential development. Client: Alameda Homes, Inc. Ciro le'Oaks;;Ranch,Napa aunty, -Designed drainage and buttresses for landslides. Client: Girdle Oaks, Inc. Memberships American.Society of Civil Engineers (Past Chairman, Geotechriical Group, San Francisco Section) ChiEpsilon,National Civil Engineering Honorary Fraternity Structural Engineers Association;ofNorthem California National and California Societies of°Professional Engineers (Past President, Redwood"Chapter) Construction.Specifications'Institute (Past President, Redwood Empire Chapter) International Society of Soil Mechanicsand Foundation Engineering Association of State Dam Safety!Officials, Affiliate Member United States Committee on LargeDams-(member, Technical Activities Committee, 1985-present) Publications 1996. Dispersive lay problem at Mule Creek Dam mitigated by utilization • lime-treated Association,ated ed d nsive,zones.. In Proceedings, 1996 Annual Confer- of 6. of State Dam SafetyOfficials, Seattle, Washington. - Harding ESE, Inc., Keith H. Bergman - Page 8 • • 1983 Strength of offshore gravel islands to resist ice,loads. hi Proceedings, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, May 2=5 (with T. V. Kotras add C. Arnold). • 1 ;I • • • • • :.1 1 Harding.ESE, Inc. ' Gary A. Lieberman, R.E.A. Senior Geologist Experience Mr.,Liebenhah has over 12 years;ofexperience planning, coordinating,d irecting, and conducting contaminated site investigations and environmental site assessments (ESAs). He has extensive'experience in underground:'storage tank removal and regulations compliance. He is responsible/for documenting field Observations_and compiling;-field data,for final reports: He has expertise in landfill gas monitoring; air sampling, and soil logging, as well as.inrgroundwater monitoring well;installation, development, and sainpling. Training Hazardous vvaste.operations,and emergency,response training Supervisory hazardous substances/waste health and safety training 8"-hour.radioactivity and nuclear gauge safety training 'Confined space entry.training. .-_-._. . .__ ... . . -. OSHA 10-hour training in ConsttuctiOn Health and Safety AHERA Building InspectorandManagement'Planning *Education B.S., Geology, Sonoma State University;Rohnert Park, California, 19.87 Registrations and. Registered Environmental Assessor Certifications - Representative Projedts Lakeville.Hiahway Itnprovement, Petaluma, California—Conducted environmental;investigation services■forhighway improvements that ' included'widening.the existing highway"to four lanes over a length of approximately 9,600 feet. Performed Phase•:I and 2 environmental - site assessments, investigation for lead:contamination, cost studies for soil disposal options, and geotechnical,and environmental services during,construction. Client: City, of Petaluma, Department of Public Works Second Street Widening, San Rafael,,California=.Conducted hazardous materials investigation for the street widening,of an area approxir°ately 16 feet wide by 1,400 feet long on the south side of ;Second Street and under grounding,and installing electric, telephone, and cable television linesllwnhin the Widening and Utility'District areas!in underground trenches that,,were excavated along Lindaro . Street, Lincoln Avenue,SecondiStreet, Third'Street,:and Ritter ' Street Additionally,,as part of this,proj'ect, storm drain and sanitary sewer lines and other utilities within the roadway alignment were • • also_abandoned and/or relocated. The road•widening portion of the project was Completed in an area with documented contaminated soil Harding ESE, Inc: ' Gary A. Lieberman - Page 2 and groundwater. Client:' CSW/Stuber,Stroeh and the City of San • Rafael Former PG&E manufactured gas plant; northern California—Field Task Manager/Supervisor for the development of a 12-acre former coal gasification plant with polycyclicsaromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) and volatile organic compounds(VOCs). The site is slated to ben corporate cal-mins for a large, nationahsoftware company. Responsiblefor site:characterization activities, construction health-and safety plans, air monitoring during construction, and geotechnical analysis. Client:- Fair,Isaac Incorporated z:. Mahon Creek"Restoration, San Rafael California. —Performed evaluation of soil andsedimett for disposal characterization and, worker protection. Completed a Site Specific'Health and Safety and Soils Managenibnt Plan for the construction activities to be conducted during restoration program. Client City of San Rafael Phase I ESAs San'Jose, California' Task Manager for as-needed. ` environmental services,,;assisted with performing ESAs of properties leased by client but being-returned to owners 1Facilities'included'offices, research and development, equipment testing,;and manufacturing: Client IBM • Phase I ESAs,and Limited.Phase IT Investigations Various Sites, . Milpitas,California-Review of environmental agency list database reports, pet forming site visits, evaluation of site-conditions via investigatiomand-preparation of final report. Client Confidential Phase I ESA's„Arizona„California, and Utah-Perfonnedsite, inspections of.vetidor facilities on National Parks'properties, review of envirommental agencylist"database reports, evaluation of site conditions with respect to existing'UST s, preparation of final report. • Client Confidential 'Monitoring;Well:Installation,;Quarterly Monitoring,Aquifer Testing, Phase II Site Assessment Assisted in characterizing,release-from former chemical,storage and distribution center in highly sensitive area Client: Confidential 'Task Manager;,UST Removal Program, Fort Ord,. California-,Supervised removal of.USTs and remediation of-soil impacted-by UST releases Coordinated with regulatory and facility personnel to speed up,+site closure process. Obtained;site:closures: Responsible for ttnplementing investigations, interpreting data, tracking and managing project:budget, and preparing report. Client: U.S. Army Corps;of Engineers, Sacramento District Task Manager; Site Characterization, Santa:Rosa • California - Supervised and managed field-operations, including Harding ESE, Inc. • Gary AA.Lieberman - Page 3 • drilling,.surface.sampling and installing soil-vapor probes: Responsible for implementing,investigations, interpreting data, tracking,,and managing projeci+budget; and;preparing report: Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacraiiichto District Field Operations Coordinator,Fort Hunter Liggett, California-.Coordinated and managed-field operations, including drilling, well sampling, and installing and sampling soil vapor and groundwater probes. Performed:technical review of all field documentation, including field reports'and boring and well logs. Interpreted.field data for report preparation: Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District Environmental Baseline Surveysand Findings of Suitability to Lease, BRAC Program,Fort Ord, California Prepared EBSs and F.OSTsthat accelerated real property transfersin accordance with Defense:Base.Closure and RealigninentlAct. Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District Task Manager, Waste Management:Program;-FortOrd,; • California -Tracked soil and groundwater produced during installation and sampling of wells. Arranged and facilitated disposal of soil and groundwater. Client: US..Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District • Site Assessment, Contra Costa-County, California-Conducted tests using-an organic-vapor analyzer.(OVA),and installed and maintained meteorological stations for use during air-'monitoring. Client: Confidential RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility=Study, Contra Costa County, California•- Conducted geotechnical well drilling,,purged wells, performed groundwater titrations, and prepared daily field logs and other reports: Client: Confidential SiteiCliaraoterization, Santa Rosa, California-Conducted field tasks to delineate?groundwater contamination: Developed and purged monitoring wells, collected groundwater,samples, calibrated and rnaihtaihed'field.instruinents, and-prepared daily field reports, groundwater,sampling forms,,and chain of custody records. Client: Mead Clark Lumber Company Tank Removal and SoilRemediation,_Rohnert Park, California- Observed tank removal, excavation of contaminated soil, collection of soil samples, and installatioof recovery,well at,site in sensitive commercial area. A m Also aoted.assite safety officer. Client: Confidential .Environmental consulting services,Richmond, California-Installed wells and trenches, provided field Supervision, and managed Harding ESE,.inc. Gary A. Lieberman - Page 4 quarterly monitoring program. Client: Chevron Land and Development Monitoring.well installation, Piscataway,New Jersey-Wasisite, supervisor during installation of triple-cased monitoring-.wells,6rair rotary method;, Client: Tang Realty • • . I •• • Harding ESE„Inc. L ft S31nntiff +r+.4 rI`37V4•471..7 ,•i% y:7n 'Pgs..s.r+p 2•glL.k '•; r6# •I'Nj�L. rug C1#w.' w+w Nr^+'' '.n2 r hxMAHON CREEK BANK RECONFIGURATION ANDABI K� f�'i .m KE/PEDESTRIAN PATH PROJECT . �-, ter I F E >ea O r a d tutx y,l, •7 u ! k TEA F - x - E e', t;.� . I ;, • SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA ;, ro> 3 , ��(['4q : fr v j x, '. K ,Na, A a .. i e .e• j� 4 , ::A Gt t1-..... r ,r '4 kr C K 4 A4pAFj.�'+4�a { ,•' FOEi�CITY�,,}}..OF SAN RMFAEL .y`Ei" `} fi hji, + � � yy�i. s 7..,..:..i-�aw. ,1 ' ,; :_k' 'q .. "ifiiii,c 41i''1Ti'. h 5v:4•vHid+t1 '} iY_i.`Y AMC u:r .a ,.iS)`f..Y... 'C�A i..�[Y[a.l.- YfF:YN,�t. SK*:f.{`�_� ..fix..-KSi..'n Aia.X�Ylizladk}�a..' Contact,,Address;and Phone No City"of`San.Rafael, Department of Public Works 1400 5th'Street . San.Rafael,`CA 94901 • Mr. Andrew Preston (415)485=3355 Project Duration: May 2000 Contract Amount: '$35;000 Harding ESE developed .geotechnical design criteria'.'for the reconfiguration of a reach of•Mahon Creek and establishment of a bike/pedestrian path along Mahon Creek. This project included evaluation of,geotechnical site conditions and path pavement design.Asoil boring investigation and sediment sampling plan were performed to screen for the presence of organics apors. All soil tested was found to be non-hazardous. With the;exception of five areas,,all soil fulfilled disposal requirements for disposal at a Class III disposal facility. Soil from the other five areas fulfilled disposal requirements for disposal at a Class II disposal facility. - Harding ESE Key Personnel: Keith,Bergman, PE ,. '` ILAnKEVILLEI'IIGHWAY4 MPROVEMENTS,PETALUMA,CAL FO{RNIAr 7 s G rp, FOR CITY,OF PETALUMA`DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS4 + `£ t +'.�'F rat n •••?,Wang._ v ,�=�o....�-..fl a is.,x._;i.L<;,f mr, +a-r'•xc.a^rr3'rrA -,:�-o;-� i.raZ!s; = f_rs.±2� ,t . ..VS :,.,�r3:0:,m•, ' Contact, Address;fand Phone No:' City of Petaluma Department of Public Works 22 Bassett•Avenue - Petaluma, CA 94952 Mr. Michael Evert ' (707),778=4304 Project Duration: 1986=2000(construction phase was completed in 1.998) Contract Amount: —$300;000 Harding ESE performed-geotechnical and, environmental investigation services for highway improvements that included widening the existing highway to four lanes over a length of approximately 9,600 feet: The widening required the cuts and•.fills,of'5 to-10 feet, constructing new driveways, installing new storm drains, extending an existing double box;culvert and bridge; and;constructing a new 200-foot-long retaining wall. The scope of work included performing laboratory'tests-and corrosion analyses for the new culverts,:and structures=and preparing a "Materials Report",and;!Foundations,Report in accordance with Caltrans format. In,addition, we performed Phase I and II site assessments, investigation for lead contamination, cost studies for soildisposaloptions, and geotechnical and environmental servicesiduringconstruction. Harding ESEIKeyPersonriel: Keith Bergman, PE.and Garry Lieberman, REA .' City of Novato/SOQ/11130100 Harding:ESE, Inc. 1 1 1 t$ECOND S REST WIDENING AND LINDARO STREET,UNDERGROUND UTILITY�PROJECT i i ' c ,,?; s 'at x� xtN c vxr .rc r trod r s 0 1 _ SAN RAFAEL CALIFORNIA, SANIRAFAEL'�CALIFORNIAN ; '"` t" '1`4 p}^ � MI.E Ff`� k FOR CITY.OF SAN,RAFAEL; r *- s.�" ' Z±� ` x« s A Z , � , . 4/.--n.a3.Y-. .nPTXt +..a CM'J!4M ,M +Fl3. i?Ye.P:st'11:Y`h'Pn4uff .''ti47r }r; drr4 " " w5.bsu,_ 1L;'.-S.; .rr`ri-Lrs S--.? . Contact,Address;and;Phone.No: g y ro '° ' ` :`,`" ±tc"qc r ' ; Fe,..q 9 A SfrfY i} tL,fl �F 1,,,-.54,42,, Mr. Andy Preston - � _4 3 1 City of San Rafael a. � �N„,1 ; �> r', ` , 1 Y *, xa ` -- v - ,- 1400 5'"Avenue ,.",- . : �� San Rafael CA '94913. "' ,`- r ,:' r- ', (415)485 3355 "-,` r.'° , z 416a ri,i t ie t 1 Project Duration: 1999 "` d � fa° ,IN �i� Contract Amount: $213,000 � T �p{i� � '� �� I G�If-�� 't'� :�l r� r, fP t :tlf r r. r ° . , The project consisted of the widening of Second', a r,,''..`�.L X41 I . r ; ;, . r"t �"� _• i Street in downtown San Rafael and .u> t „� ,f ,l-; I undergrounding the utilities including electric,; €. X711'-:'Grx : ,`L4 . 4 . '- t.�_.?_- ?n f _S_: telephone, and cable-television jines within the i street widening,.area and within the Utility District - __-. - __.- ::----- _- . .. .. .. I areas that included portions of Lindero Street,' Lincoln Avenue, Second Street, Third Street,and Ritter Street. Additionally, as part:of:this project, storm drain and sanitary sewer lines and other utilities within the roadway alignment were also abandoned and/or relocated. The project was completed in an area-with documented soil and groundwater contamination. Harding ESEprevided geofechnicalrand:;environmental services-to support this work. Theiscope included conducting • a boring investigation program of the ,area'to- evaluates disposal;alternatives for soilr and 'groundwater'dunng construction activities, to assess the health and safety requirements necessary during construction; and to provide -therdata to provide geotechnical design,parameters. In addition, Harding ESE prepared a site specific.Health and Safety a Soil Management Plan, which were required for submittal to the local and state agencies.; These plans specified how contaminated material would.be dealt with during'construction. As part'of'this project we also negotiated on behalf of=the City'of San Rafael with the parties responsible for the contamination and successfully II recovered a majority of the additional cost associated with constructing in contaminated materials During i construction, Harding ESE provided field oversightto;ensure,compliance.with the Health and'Safety.Plan:andathe Soil Management"Plan, and conducted air-monitoring to ensure that health based'levels to protect construction workers and the community were not exceeded. • i Harding ESE'Key,Personnel: Gary Lieberman, REA; Keith Bergman worked on the-same project but-for CSW Stuber-Stroeh • • . City of Novato/SOQ/11/30/00 Harding ESE,-Inc: 2• -+1 a .5esy. ,wok ins, t-. et.- rt,7-U tW a4 sa'^ ,F*51i4:r k egiti-. ,.,,, :. ENVIRONMENTAL;CONSTRUCTION, AND HEALTH AND SAFETY SERVICES IN,SUPPORTh,fig Z. ink OF`-DEVELOPMENT SAN.RAFAEL ?CALIFORNIA ti °�� f ,,{ i� �cer d -' l ° •?_'.�rw;�.p�S r-- e74 a2'J;"',,-� ; ,&, i' f,.., �ORtEA1R ISAAC INCORPORATED x 7€ � ° +z q "? L r' � , MIF h v ' i vi`..3Y.`3."i:.�-P.A' t.4-�[z.:.r'Jt X51 °2L5 '. .�._w•.*t fay .:x".' .,o-: S n..E��a' Akt uc"ggt/tig4 �t�'-. ?..i;4'.43.n Contact,-Address, and Phone No: `f' " i ;t°t" €- ;, 44,4,,,;*-: •• i 4Yk I:• # �y+,'.;M ( rtt nib/ NZ Fairlsaac, Incorporated 120 North'Redwood Drive ' San Rafael, California. 94903-1996 ' Mr. Stephen Gale • (415)-491-5210 Project Duration.: 1997—Jan. 2000 { f ' t °' I ContractAmount $1,000000 t � , Harding.ESE has provided',a full range of environmental and , r t4.. 1�� r 4r construction services related to the development of a 12-acre *� ` x rat Si E r ` "' t former Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) coal and oil t .ew O .,: ff s• .t' gasification'plant. The primary soil.contaminants are PAHs, _' " '" a ' which were detected in soil;samples;at concentrations up to • 33,000 parts per million. Low-concentrations of.the VOCs, BTEX, and PAHs,were also detected in groundwater. The- site is being redeveloped as a corporate campus for a large, nationarsoftware company. • Harding ESE worked with the client+the general contractor, the prospective tenant, and the regulatory agencies to develop a.Soil Management Plan that allowed for excavation and onsite deposition-of contaminated soil. Soil in the • areas where the buildings will be constructed wasrexcavated and moved°to an onsite soil depository where it was buried under clean fill and a future:parking lot. The remainder of the site was capped with eithen2 feet of clean fill, parking lot or building pads. The•innovative plan,also allows for the majority of construction to occur as "non- hazardous". This approach saved the client over one million dollars and'improved'the construction and occupancy schedule. To achieve overall approval-of the plan we conducted a risk assessment which involved extensive modeling of dispersion and deposition,of PAH-contaminated'dusts at various points adjacent.to the site and concluded the chosen remedy would be protective of human health and the environment In concert with the Soil Management Plan, Harding ESEr prepared a Construction H&S Plan, and a Construction'Air Monitoring Flan which were reviewed and approved by the DTSC. As part;of"the Construction Air Monitorng Plan, risk-based action levels action levels were developed for the protection of .offsite residents potentially exposed to dust containing PAHs during construction. The action levels for dust were developed for hypothetical residential receptors and were;pr`otective for onsite "Harding ESE has provided exceptional service in workers exposed to dust: remediating the former PG&E site and quickly aligning the,site for development as the Fair Isaac In addition, an extensive community`relations/outreach program Office Complex Their leadership and technical was developed and implemented which involved preparing a and regulatory skills were,paramount to the. Community Relations Plan, conducting numerous community success of this project" meetings, presentations to the 'local planning commission, Matt Oliver school board, and activistgroup activities and preparing fact Development Manager and President sheets. Prior to construction, we were also involved with Oliver and Associates preparation of several EIR sections;modeling evaluating the effectiveness of an existing groundwater extraction and treatment system, andtscreening and costing of remedial alternatives. We also preformed the,geotechnical'investigations irt design of the campus. Harding ESE provided construction management and.health and safety support during implementation of the Soil • Management Plan. Construction activities occurred over a '5-month- period and included excavation and "entombment" of the contaminated materials, site,grading, streetwidening, LIST and fuel distribution line removal, and utility installation. City off,Novatb/SOQ/11/30100. Harding ESE,Inc. 3 :,1 . • HARDING ESE, INC: ,_ • INSURANCE°AND BONDING INFORMATION • Main Insurance Agent:, ABDiinsurance:and Financial Services • 301-IslandParkway, Suite 300 ' • . • Belmont, CA 94002-4'1'10 . Contact: Jeff Rodriguez ' Tel_ (650) 508-4329 General Liability • . Carrier Reliance National IndemnityInsurance Company 'PolicyNo.:. NGB1721262 Limits:. . $1,000,000 bodily injury&property damage per occurrence/$2,000;000 aggregate Term: 7/1/99 to 7R/ 00 Form : Occurrence policy Rating: A-X1II I Automobile'Liability Gamier: Reliance National Indemnity nailfance Company 0 PolicyNo.: NKA 1•722169 and NKAd 722170 Limits: $1000,000 bodily injury&:property damage per occurrence/aggregate Term: 7/1/99 to:7/1/00 . Form: Occurrence policy Rating: A-XIII Workers`Compensation/Emplovers Liability Carrier: United;Pacific Insurance Company' policy No.: NWA2518309 (Stop Gap.in North Dakota, Ohio, Washington, West Virginia and.Wyomi-ng), Limits: WC: Statutory . EL: $1,000;000 each'accident. . I Term: 7/1/99 to 7/1/00 Rating: A-XIII Contractor's!'.Operations&Professional Services I Carrier Reliance'National Indemnity Insurance Company PolicyNo.: NTF2517461 Limits: ' $1,000;000 per claim aggregate Tenn:: 7/1/99 to 7/1/00 Form; Claims made policy Rating: A-XIII I W:\MIDAS\HLA_INFO\FQi'AINSUA.DOC' • Bonding Agent:. Mafsh 160 Spear Street, 12 'Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Contact: Carol Henry Tel: (415) 743-8145 Regarding Bonding Capacity ' HLA's surety company is,Reliance Insurance Company. Reliance,has issued construction contract bonds for HLA in excess of$7,000,000 and HLA has been assured that we have'an aggregate capacity in excess of $50,000,000. • • • • • • • • . • W:IMIDASIHLA INFOIHLAINSUR.DOC • BIOSKETCHES'FOR BERGMAN AND'LIEBERMAN FOR SECTION 1.4 PROJECT TEAM AND • QUALIFICATIONS Keith Bergman, PE;GE'—Geotechnical.Engineer Mr Bergman;a Principal Engineer with Harding ESE, Will be responsible for conducting the.required;'geotechnical engineering services: He has over 35 years of experience in construction and geotechnical engineering. He specializes!in geotechnical engineering for industrial, commercial, educational, and hospital;structures, as well as site grading, landslide, repair, dams and levees, and waterfront projects. The following are three'brief, relevant project descriptions;including client contact, address, and projecfduration. 1. Project Name; f Mahon Creek Bank Reconguratiomand Bike/Pedestrian Path .Project,'San Rafael, CA Project Description:, Provided engineering services,for thegeotechhical design criteria for reconfiguration of a reach of Mahon Creek and establishment of a bike/pedestrian path along`Mahon Creek: Client Name; Address and Contact City of San Rafael Department of Public,Works 1400 5th Street _ San'Rafael„CA_94901 _ , ..- __ .. _ Mr.Andrew Preston (415)485-3355 Project Duration: May 2000 2. ProjectName: Lakeville Highway'Improvements Petaluma, CA • Project Description: Performed geotechnical engineering for highway improvements, including widening the existing highway to four lanes over a length of 9,600 feet Client Name, Address and Contact City of Petaluma Department of PublicWorks 22 Bassett Avenue Petaluma, CA 94952 Mr: Michael Evert' . (707) 778-4304 Project Duration: 1986,to 2000(construction phase was completed in 1998) • 3. Project Name: Bellam and East Francisco Boulevard Intersection Improvement, Sant Rafael, CA. Project Description: Provided,geotechnical`engineering services for the design of widening and additional turn lane improvements at intersection and on-ramp.to.Interstate 1-580 freeway: ClienfName, Address and'£ontact:Kimley-Horn andtAssociates and'the City of San Rafael ?o? Mr„Anush'Nejad. • (925)463-5640 Project Duration: December-1999 • • • • Gary Lieberman; REA— Phasel,Environmental SiterAsseSsment5 Mr..Lieberman has'over12 years of:expenence'planning,, coordinating, directing, and conducting contaminated site investigations and environmental site assessmentse(ESAs). He has extensive experience in underground storage tank removal and regulations compliance He;jsresponsible for documenting field observations and compiling field data for final reports He has expertise in landfill gas monitoring, air samphng,and soil logging, as well as in groundwater monitoring well installation development, and sampling. .Mr. Lieberman's relevant project experience follows. 1. Project Name: Secon&StreetWidening and Lindaro Street`Underground.UtilityProject, San Rafael, CA Project Description: Conducted a boring investigation program of the area to evaluate disposal alternatives for soil and groundwater during construction activ ities and assessed health and safety requirements'necessary during construction. Client Name, Address and Contact City of San Rafael Department of Public Works 1400 5th Street. San Rafael, CA 94901 Mr. Andrew Preston. (415)-485:3355; Project Duration: 1999' • 2. Project Name: Lakeville Highway Improvements, Petaluma,CA Project Description: Performed environmental investigations forhighway improvements, including widening the existing:highway to four lanes over a length of;9 600 feet Performed;a Phase I and ' II'sde assessment, lead contamination invesfgation cost studies for soil disposal options,.and other environmental services duringiconstruction. Client Name, Address and Contact City,of Petaluma Department of Public Works 22 Bassett'Avenue Petaluma', CA '94952 Mrr Michael Evert (707) 778-4304 Project Duration: 1986 to 2000.(construction phase was completed-in 1998) 3. Project Name: Environmental, Construction, and Health.and Safety Services in Support of Development San Rafael, CA Project Description: Performed environmental investigations for highway improvements, including widening the existing highway to;four lanes overa length of 9,600 feet Performed a Phase I and IRsite assessment;lead contamination.investigation„cost studies for soil disposal options;,and other environmental services during construction. Client Name, Address and Contact: Fair Isaac, Incorporated 120.North Redwood Drive' San Rafael, California 9.4903-1996 Mr. Stephen Gale • (415)491-5210 Project Duration: 1997-.January 2000 Jeff Church—Biological Assessment • BIO.to come • • • • . Jeffrey L Church. Staff Environmental,Scientist II Experience Mr:,Church.has &years of experiencelin;field and environmental biology:and has over c3 years of experience providing,technical knowledge as biological consultant. He has practical knowledge in the fields of plant anatomy and . taxonomy, animal physiologyinvertebrate taxonomy and ecology, and ecological;systems;as a whole..He-has,experience conducting and assisting in numerous baseline vegetation:and wildlife:studies, freshwater marsh surveys and.wetiand,delineations, characterizing-and thappping;plant communities, developing habitat restoration and,nitigation plans, including plans for ,•recontouring,artificial land forms to blend.with the surrounding natural topography„conducting remediationiand;mitigationmonitoring, and North Coastal and Sierran forest studies. He has'also engaged::+in biological .surveys which`resulted in the..creation of Biological Clearance documents. He has assisted"in the creation of-Integrated,Natural Resource Management Plans (INRMP),..Habitat Characterization Reports (HCR),;and Habitat - • Management Plan(MVP) and UPS 'Fish ana Wildiife Service (USFWS) _. . ;management-documents. Federal and state agencies that Mr. Church.has ;coordinated or-consulted with in'the preparation and utilization of environmental documentation include thehU.S. Army, U.S. Army Corps of • • Engineers (USACE), U.S Fish,and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Game(CDFG),Tand Moss Landing Harbor District • (ML'HD).. Activities have included biological monitoring of lead - ;remediation sites, and biologicaPclearance studiesiforlead remediation and groundwater contamination sites located>atthe former Fort.Ord Army base. Mr. Church has,also conducted and assisted in soil and plant sampling . activitiesiregarding lead,contamination;including Global Positioning . iSystemsr'(GPS)mapping of lead:contaminated habitat,and sensitive • biological it sources. Training 40'hours OSHA HAZWOPER,Tr'aining„1997 . • Lead•Awareness Training:in compliance withithe Lead in Construction Standard,'190 8:Hour'OSHA.HAZWOPER refresher-Training. 1998, 1999, 2000 Respirator Fit Test Tl 997; 1998,1999, 2000' First..Aid and,CPR Training. 1998• Education B.A.,Biology'with,emphasisinecological systems, Sonoma State University,Rohnert Park, California, 1997 Representative Projects - National'Environmental Policy.Act'(NEPA):Documentation ' Supplementary Habitat Characterization.ReportforiLead Remediation Areas • at Site Beach Trainfire Ranges on Presidiotof Monterey Annex, Monterey California. Primary.author responsible for producing report detailing impacts to sensitive:biologiaal resources assodiated'with coastal dune scrub Harding LaWson%MsoGiates 09-03-98/02 Jeffrey L. Church - Page 2 and coastal strand habitats, as identified in the Installation-Wide Multispecies Habitat Management Plan (IMP), during lead remediation activities at the-Site 3-Beach Trainfire Ranges.(Site 3). This report is a supplement to the Habitat Characterization Report,which provided baseline data of biological resources located at Site 3 prior to remedial and restoration,activities:Activities included,'data analysis of HMP species and habitat composition,and abundance in areas impacted by remedial activities. Vegetation mapping of areas affected by remedial and initial restoration activities was also conducted. Baseline habitat conditions identified in-the HCR and this supplement will be used to-establish successicriteria for • ongoing restoration efforts. Client: U.S. Army-Corps of Engineers, Sacramento.District. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) for Presidio of Monterey(POM):and Presidio of Monterey Annex(POM Annex)at the former FortiOrd, California: Assisted in the preparation of the,INRMP to be used as a component and supporting element of theinstallationmaster,plan. The scope of;the INMRP•for the POM and POM Annex-addressed four criteria of natural resources management. The INRMP:provides for a management plan to be used as a guide for new.and continuing mission activities. A land'•management and grounds maintenance plan that identifies existing land uses and provides a framework for current and future uses of base lands: The fish and wildlife:management plan identifies, potential flora.and•fauna and makes recommendations for the preservation of sensitive species and habitat. An outdoor recreation`plan was;developed as a •• guide for cuirent and future recreational activities: Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District Biological clearance and preparation of mitigation plans for"remedial activities at Presidio of Monterey Annex, Monterey County, California. Responsible for the;evaluatibn of soil remediation'Iinpacts at,Hazardous Toxiciand,Radiological,Waste (HTRW) sites located at the former Fort Ord. • Duties involved surveying remedial sites;for sensitive habitat and-special- . status species that could be impacted during construction activities;and producing mitigation plans to reduce impacts. Mitigation plans were developed in accordance with National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA), and applicable, relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs)as defined in the recordof decision for remedial actions at the Presidio of Monterey Annex. Remedial areas,'included unexploded:ordinance sites, landfill sites, air monitoring sites,and sewage treatment sites. Client: International Technologies Corporation Technical Memorandum for Lead;Reinediation Areas at Site 39A,Presidio of Monterey.Annex, Monterey County, California: Prepared technical memorandum,detailing final;results of remedial activities and associated impacts-at three lead remediapon`study areas in Site 39A. Responsible for documenting impacts to•sensitive biological resources and habitat associated with,remedial-activities and describing mitigation measures implemented to minimize those impacts Client: International Technologies Corporation. Harding.Lawson Associates s Jeffrey L. Church- Page,3; 'Technical Memorandum'for Interim Action,(IA) Sites�.at Presidio of • Monterey Annex, Monterey County, California. Prepared technical • • memorandums detailing final results ofrernedial activities andassociated' • impacts atIAsites 1,2 outfall 15,32, outfall34/35, and'36 Responsible for • documenting pacts,to,sensitive'biological resources:and habitat associated witliiremedial activities;and describing mitigation:measures implemented to minimize those impacts; Client: International Technologies Corporation; Environmental Assessment for State-Route,28'(SR-28)/Nevada,Department of Transportation (NDOT) Off-Highway Parking Project, Lake Tahoe, Nevada. Assisted in writing draft EA for.off-highway parking to compensate for,existing parking+spaces lost,dur-ing2mplementation of the Master Plan fon:Erosioh Contro[and Storm Water,Management for State Route 28 (S122; 8). FieldcStudiesyand Habitat Monitoring . Legislative'.DraftsEnvironmental Impact•''Statement, Timbisha-Shoshone Horiieland,:Death Valley; California andNevada Desert. Conducted reconnaissance-level•tiabitat'evaluation*of land parcels located'at Furnace Creek:in.Death Valley National'Park,Death Valley Junction, and Lower Centennial.Flat in California, and'at Scotty''s Junction and Lida':Summit in Nevada :Habitat Evaluations.were;conducted.to identify habitat suitability • of each parcel to support special status plant`and animal species, and to identify and:map drainages that may qualify.as Waters,of the United States, • . of 'etlands. Special-status species surveyswere conducted fofdesert tortoise andMoj'ave ground squirrel. The.project proposes;a land transfer of both federal and private;lands to the Timbisha-Shoshone Indian Tribe to re- establish tribal'homelands Client';U:S. Department of the Interior,National Park Service:. Biological monitoring of lead remediation at Site 3',Beach Trainfire Ranges, Presidio;;of Monterey Annex'(Fort.Ord), Monterey County, California. Activities included biological surveys of sensitive:species^and habitats as identified'.inthe Installation-Wide,Ivlultispecies,Habitat Management Plan (PIMP) Baseline,,and.onsite data'was used<'as a guide for'directing various remediation activities Additiotfal'duties included monitoring remedial activities;for compliance;with,mitigation measures identified in the HMP and applicable,`relevant, and requirements (ARARs) as defined in,the+record of decision for remedial actions at_the'Presidio of Monterey Annex. Data collection,andtmapping;of incidental take of special-status and endangered species during remedialiactivities and initial restoration activities was also perforthed. Mapping of final area of disturbance conducted using Global Positioning Sytem (GPS)unit: Special-status species_associated with.Site 3-include the,federally endangered plant sand ilia Gilia;tenui ora'ar" g _ ( fl enaraa), tt?'@;federally threatened plant Monterey . sp:ineflower(Chorizantli,cp pungens), the federally endangered plant robust spineflower(Chorizanthe'r robusta), the federally endangered plant �: Yadon's rem orchid (Piperia yadon i), and'include federal plant species of coneem endemic to the MontereyBayregion.such as coast wallflower ,Harding Lawson.Associates ' Jeffrey L. Church - Page4 (Erysimum ammophiluin), sandmat_manzanita(Arctostaphylos pum'ila),-and . animal species-such.as the federally endangered Smith's blue butterfly (Euphilotes enoptes smithi), the federally,threatened:Western snowy plover (Charadrius alexaTdrinus nrvosus);;and the federal species of concern; California black legless lizard (Anniella pulchra nigra). Client:International Technologies Corporation. Site 39-Bullet Density Studies at Presidio of Monterey Annex, Monterey County, California. Field biologist during pilot study responsible for collection of plant samples collocated with soil Samples-used to establish lead contamination,levels attributed to small armscfiring at various ranges located within Site 39. During.follow upsurveys,:duties.included visual assessment of surface coverage densities of lead bullet particles. soil sampling, and'GPS mapping of range features; soil and.plant sampling { locations, sensitive herbaceous'species, and areas of greater than 10 percent surface coverage of lead bullet concentrations. Client: U.S.-Army Corps of .Engineers, Sacramento District. • Annual Monitoring Report Biological Baseline Studies^and Follow-up Monitoring;at Unexploded Ordnance Sites on Former Fort Ord,Presidio of Monterey Annex, Monterey California. Tasks inclnded:data management- and analysis during follow=up monitoring to assess maritime-chaparral and wetland habitat impacts incurred during ordnance removal at various unexploded ordnance(UXO)lisites, Survey data was.compiled to"provide plant species,composition, dominance; and abundance and to documentthe • development of maritime chaparral habitat to meet,restoration requirements identified'in'the-Fort`Ord Multispecies Habitat Management Plan (HMP): UXO sites'were'cleared of vegetation prior to ordnance.removal activities by • either manual'means.(clipping) or,burning, with other OE sites left intact {sera]).Data was also analyzed;to compare regeneration's rates among,the three different habitat treatments. Client: U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers, Sacramento District. • Habitat monitoring of wetlands at Presidio of Monterey Annex, Monterey • _ County, California. Conducted botanical surveys for wetland indicator species and transitional zone-species. Concurrently performed surveys;for special status wildlife species associated with wetland communities,.-as identified in the Fort Ord Multispecies Habitat Management Plan=(HMP)and. the Wetland Restoration Plan for Unexploded Ordnance Removal:,Activities at Former Fort Ord (WRP) 'Work included habitat characterization by analyzing and,•evaluating;plant-species-composition and abundance, and, generation of associated;wildlife;lists. Client: U.S..Army Corps of Engineers,'Sacramento District: Habitat monitoring Maritime Chaparral habitat at unexploded ordnance sites at Presidio ofMonterey,Annex,;Monterey, California. Activities involved"collecting quantitative data measuring species diversity,abundance, and dominance associated with maritime chaparral habitat impacted.during; 0. ordnance removal activities: Surveys were conducted as follow-up monitoring to determine vegetation regeneration rates atsdifferent • Harding':.Lawson.Associates Jeffrey L. Church - Page 5 • unexploded ordnance(UXO) sites and to-documentthe development of maritime chaparral habitat to meet'restoration.requirements identified in the FortOrdMultispecies Habitat Management Plan (HMP). Client: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Sacramento District. ' Biological Baseline Studies at unexploded`ordnance sites at Presidio of Monterey Annex(Fort Ord); Monterey County, California. Activities • • involved collecting quantitative ecological;measurements of species composition, cover and density in coastalsstrand, dune scrub, and disturbed dune:habitat. Data.collection also included'species-specific surveys for . cover and densities'+of special-status plants. Client: International TechiTologies Corporation. Soil Sampling`for proposed dredging activities•in Moss Landing Harbor, :Monterey County, California. Activities included collection of harbor soils -in-areas proposed-for dredging project inthe main and north harbors. Soil samples will be used to identify and assess type and quantity of con'taminants'present=in the sediments=in,order to determine the proper disposal method. Client: Moss LandingHarbor District. Biological Baseline Studies-at Camp Roberts National Guard Base, Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties„California. Activities involved collecting quantitative ecological data on the range and distribution of • Monterey dusky-footed woodrat at Camp Roberts. Data was compiled through trapping:surveys at numerous siteson the base. Areas were • identified as being occupied by onefor more of three subspecies of dusky- - footed woodrat based,omhabitat and',presence of woodrat,droppings. Data collection also included small matnmaltrapping, nocturnal wildlife, and general herpetological+surveys for purposes,of updating faunal species lists. Client: California,Army National-Guard. Planting Plan,Agua Caliente Creek:Stabilization Project„Fremont, Alameda County,.California. Assisted:in'follow-up monitoring of plant restoration plan. Work included':.identifying'species;planted,napping their location, and analyzing their condition, using GPS unit to map and record information. Client: Alameda County,'Departrnent of Public'Works. Botanical Surveys for Tesla Road Realignment Project, Livermore, Alameda County, California. Conducted surveys forwarious floral species that could be impacted during Tesla Road realignment and erosion control projects. Work included ianalysis oftree species subject.to removal, including species identification and measurement for diameter at breast height. Client: . Alameda County, Department of Public Works. Burrowing owl surveys;at Wickland'Oil site, Martinez,Contra Costa County, California. Drafted proposal,to conduct Burrowing owl surveys at • site scheduled for future development: Client; Wickland Oil. 0 Wetland Studies Harding Lawson Associates • -1 Jeffrey L. Church - Page.6 Annual Pond Monitoring on Unexploded Ordnance Sites on Former Fort Ord Army Base, Monterey-County, California. Initially assisted and later assumed,responsibility for conducting baseline survey:and follow-up monitoring activities at wetland sites subject to unexploded ordnance (UXO) removal activities. Surveys and monitoring conducted according to current USFWS protocol and methods'detailed.in Wetland•Restoration Plan for Unexploded"°Ordnance Removal Activities at Former For•t'Ord'(WRP), prepared by United States.Army Corps of Engineers, May.1997. Surveys conducted for;special:status species including,federally threatened venial pool fairyshrimp species(Branchinecta lynch() and species of special concern California linderiella(Linder•iella occident/2/is), federal:dandidate species California tiger salamander(Anibystonta tigrinum caltforniense), federally threatened California red-legged frog(Rana aurora draytonia),, • • species of special concern;Southwestern pond turtle(Clemmys marnioi'ata pallida),.and species of special concern tricolored blackbird tricolor). Work included analysis and evaluation of special-status wildlife survey and monitoring data and generation of associated wildlife lists. Work also included,a"nalysis and,evaluation Of physical.oharacteristics ofwetlands, including measurements;for pH, turbidity,depth, surface area,-and duration ofponding. Client:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Sacramento District. Baseline Habitat Survey at_Gateway Road drainage for-proposed dredging • activities Fremont;.Alameda:County, California. Assisted in floral and faunal surveys and collecting ecological measurements in•freshwater to brackish.wetland habitat'in•advance of soil dredging activities. Project involved surveys and;,data collection inside the drainage channel'that included evaluating baseline habitat conditions, conducting,sensitive plant and animal surveysand wetland delineation mapping using OPS°;equipment. • Client: Alaineda County PublicWorks Agency. Wetlands Delineation.and Assesment at Sears'Point;International Raceway, Sonoma County California. Assisted in wetland,delineations for riparian channels, seasonal;wetlands, and:freshwater seeps and ponds. Delineation of • wetlands were performed using.Army Corps of Engineers three-parameter. method of,determination:Client: Sears Point Raceway. Wetland Assesment, Franktown•Equestrian.Center, Carson City,Washoe County,Nevada Assisted in wetland.delineation of potentially jurisdictional wetlands in,previously flood irrigated pasture lands. Delineation performed for a proposed,expansion of facilities at the equestrian;center. Work included plant community characterization, and •determination of soilcharacteristics and hydrology imareas potentially subject to'Corpsjurisdiction. Delineation of wetlands conducted using Army Corps.of Engineers three-parameter method of determination. Client Franktown Equestrian Center. Wetland;Delineation:and Assessment for San Mariit Business.Park, Novato, Marin County, California. Assisted in wetland delineation of historical wetlands alteredtby fillaand grazing activities. Delineation performed for a proposed"developnieht of a business park located in northem:Marin county. Harding;;L'awson,Associates Jeffrey L. Church - Page 7 Work included.plant community charactenzationi,-: and determinati • on of soil characteristicsuand hydrology imareas potentially,subject to Corps jurisdiction. Delineation of wetlands conducted.using.Army Corps of Engineers three:parameter method.of determination. Mapping,of wetland boundaries and,soil test pits conducted with the use of a.Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. Client: Michael Hooper. Wetland Delineation and Assessment-for Strawberry Point School, Tiburon, Marin.County, California.. Assistedsm,wetland.delineation of historical wetlands altered by fill.and past;use.as'an elementary school playground. Delineation performed for proposed'reopening of school and re- establishment of the playground. Work included plant community • characterization, and determination'of soil characteristics and hydrology in areas potentially subject to Corpsljurisdiction. Delineation of wetlands conducted using Army Corps of Engineers three-parameter method of determination. Mapping of wetland,boundaries and soil testrpits conducted with the use of a Global Positioning.System (UPS) unit. Client: Mill Valley SchoorDistrict. • 0 • • • Harding,Lawson-Associates Nor-Coast Utility Design, Inc. • ;\`oven:hcr 28, 2000 ,Mr. Rod .Scaccalosi Ch1}/Si.u'he( 5troch Engineering Group, Inc. • 790 De Long .Avenue, Novato, ,Californ.ia 94945-3246 bear Rod: This,letter iaa'.biief overview of our company's business sent upon your request. Our company-was established in March, 1984;owned 75,percent by:Pamela D.Krinsky; PresidentlTrea`aurer, and 25 percent.by Steven Krtns&y.The Company is a.Women's,Business Enterprise,.certified both by-Pacific Bell and the California Public Utilities Commission. The majority of the Company's employees are past Pacific Bell, PG&E and AT&T. personnel with many, years of eirpenence in?the field of•pubhc utilities construction and engineering. The Company's business is divided into two major;areas. The main part',of the-business provides_ i technical services m outside plant engineering Mad',inspection to Pacific Bell, PG&E,and Cats' companies.We design aerial, buried and underground cable ,layouts for new and facilities, conduit systems including manhole and multiple duet substructures and high pressure:gas mains and services'for new and;rebuild projects. Also we design overhead.to underground conversion. projects, including.joint`trench composite design;:coordination with all private and public utility companies;;,cost estimates,percentage.breakouts(form,B), and contract documents'and ;specifications: When requested we have supplied inspectors to oversee:the day to day operation,:this includes public relations, itenis of completion'for payment and,the quality of work. The second'part of,the.businese is to provide joint trench utility drawings of telephone, cat, gas and electric line installations,,mcluding streetlight and;signali ation design for new subdivisions, business parks; chopping centers"and assessment districts for private developers. In addition;_we nowoffeigas,electric and'eommunicat on designs. Thank you for yogr;interestin our company: Sincerely, Steven;Krinsky,;G.M. 774 Joni Ct. •Windsor, California-:'95992.:.(707)838=4492•Fax: (707)8378323 0 • Mr. 'lied Spoors P.age:' J • Novefrther .29, '2000 Steve Krinsky wilLact: ae project coordinEitbr for. the dry utility relocation portion for this project. His function will he to over see the Utility Companies (PG&E; Verizon and AT&T) design with consistency and accuracy for this project., In addition. he will coordinate his design team 'effort to provide' a. coniprehensive product. that will be on time and within budget for the .project.. • Anticipated Lime allotment for this function will be 40 hours at $75.00• per person, hour.. • Jerry Milsap and Jim Dearduff will provide trenching design plans based on ciadd provided drawings from the Civil 'Engineer and Utility Com panies. They win: conduct: 'field reviews and coordinate trench routes with Civil and Utilities. Anticipated time allotment for this function will he 80 hours collectively at $65.00 per person hour. • • • • • • • • .j STEVEN KR:I\SKY • . 771 ,lom C7 0 Windsor, California ,95492 0 'Telephone: (707)838-449' 0` fax: (707)837-832,3 it EDUCATION OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE; Major in A4echanical Design, 1965- 1968 Com pulel Certificate, Computer Programming 1982 Completed 2 courses in advanced computer • •_ progr.aamn i ng. EXPERIENCE Professional Experience Mr .Krinsky has over 30 years of experience in design . and construction in the field of gas, electric, telephone . and cable utilities. For more than 8 years, Steve worked for Detroit Edison designing aerial and. underground electric systems for residential and comrnericial use. For the past 22 years Steve has. designed outside telephone; plant. as d contractor for Pacific Bell. In addition, Steve has coordinated and designed joint lrenclr composite plans for utility undergrounding projects in Northern California.: REPRESENTATIVE; PROJECTS • See attached pages • • JER:OME L .MILSA`P 1500 NfeAdowlark Lane. 0 Petaluma, Ca/ifOrnia 9494 0 'Telephone: (707)763 .5491 OB}ECTIV Position With an rfrIgineering 'and/or construction utility firm. To Litilize 30 years in gas ;pipeline ;de •ign and construcLi'bn. EDUCATION SIIASTA° JUNIOR C(RQECE Liberal Arts and 1956-1.962 PACIFIC GAS ANT) ELEC'I'kic Co. ' Welding, Estimating, Serviceman, Safely and First-aid EXPERIENCE PACIFIC CAS AND ELECTRIC CO. Gas Estimator, 1963=1994 Design natural gas systems using Cadi draw ing for new and/or existing commercial, industrial and residential customers. 'Prepare 'joint trench composite and coordi- nated titans with other utilities. Pr:ePare cost. estimates for- or gas pipe installation, trench ,excavation and backfill. Prepare encroachment permits to governing agencies. NCR-COAST UTILITY bESION, INC. Joint. Trench Composite Designer and :Coordinator Prepared Composite Plans for the Malin City Shopping Center, Marlow ;Road Rule 20A project. in Santa Rosa, Rule 20A project li'n the town of .'Elk and various other composite plans Coordinate with other utilities and agencies review existing, and new substructures for possible conflicts' . • 5 • JANE'S DEARDL FE' S' 2315 Sage Brush Cane. O Sa—nla Rosa, California 95401 :0 Telephone. (707)546:-91'72' ORtIECTl\TE Telecomnluhicalions employment with emphasis on engineering design of conduit systems, eleetronics cabinets and aerial 'I:o uri-der g round conversions.. EDUCATION SANTA ROSA HICHSCHOOL. Diploma, General Curriculum, 1957, VARIOUS"TELECOMMUNICATIONS CLASSES EY PACIFIC HELL emphasis on safety, Accomplishments, favorite subjects, extracurricular activities. -I EXPERIENCE PAciFc BELL Various Construction assignments. 1957-1990 These- assignments include Lineman', responsible for the placement of aerial' and 'underground cable: Inspect'o`r, responsible for the ,safety- and correctness of conduit structure, place-merit. Construction Foreman; responsible for- the supervision of f,nff.eeni people in all phases of cable placement. Conduit.Engineer, 1980- 1991 Responsible for all 'Pacific Bell conduit design for Sonoma and Marin 'Counties'. 'these projects included all .major conduit structures for telephone multiple duct structures and the design and coordination for Rule 20, underground districts In addition, interfaced with the local Utility and Govermental agencies. • NOR=COAST UTILITY DESIGN. INC:- -. Communications Engineer, /9,91 present Provided supervision and support, 'for the company's :cad operations. Responsible for the preparation of Pacific Bell conduit plans, Rule 20 composite plans and Developers composite plans. NW i r List of References 410 Firm .Beoresentative CSW Struber/Stioeh Michael Herman Brelje & Race Tom JOneS, Bayside Civil Consultants 'Steven Davidson Richaond,American Homes Jim Clifford Civil Design Mark• Van Tagen Cobblestone Homes Joe Keith Hudis and Assoc, Gary Garfield Condiotti Enterprises Phil Trowbridge Rivendale Homes Bill -Benjamin Armax International Robert Skinner The Obrien *crap ch4ckschoenberijer Christepheksen :Homes, DeVe CIay Waterford Construction John Martin City of Fairfield Michael Owen • County of Solano James Gomez • City of San Rafael Andrew ,Preston City of' SaUSaiito Gordon Sweeney City of Belvedere Bob BranE Town of. Fairfax, Bill Whitney • kkehaeoPogi.cac • Resounee j� APROPOS PROPOSAL TO UNDERTAKE A .� � � �- CULTURAL RESOURCES EVALUATION SelUiGe , �, = AND RELATED SERVICES•OF THE PETALUMA. RIVER/TRAIL ENHANCEMENT PROJECT FROM LYNCH CREEK TO'"D" STREET, PETALUMA, SONOMA. COUNTY ;.j SUBMITTED BY William Roop,,ArchaeolOgical- esource Service SUBMITTED TO Ted Spores, CSW[St]2 November 30;;2000 • SPECIFIC TASKS TO'BE ACCOMPLISHED The culturairesources•eVaivation will'con§ist of a Section 106 level investigation The consultant will develop the APE map', undertake an 'archaeological records check, complete an archaeological survey.report; develop an, historical properties evaluation, and complete: the finding of ;effect for archaeology and history. The_follbWing basic tasks areto be,accomplishedas part of this project:- 1. A check of'..the information on file°with our'office and the Regional Officetof;the California Historical Resources lnformation S■stem,. to determine the presence or absence, of previously recorded,historic or prehistoric cultural resources, 2. A check 'of.;appropriate historic references to determine the potential for historic era archaeological deposits, 3. A surface reconnaissance of all -accessible parrs'of the project area to locate any visible signs df,potentially'significant historic or-prehistoric cultural deposits. 4.. Architectural analysis'to determine eligibility of structures.in the project area to the National Register of'Historib.Places, • . 5.. Evaluation of the.architectural.analysis',to deterttine.'the appropriateness of,designating an -tl historic district, . 4. Preparation of a repot describing the worktaccomplished, the results of the research, and • making appropriate recommendations•forfurther action; if warranted. 1 CONSULTANT FAMILIARITY WITH THE PROJECT AREA Archaeological Resource-Service'has been,based in'Petaluma for10 years. 'In;that.time members,,of our staff have participated in the :City's River; Enhancement Committee, The Chamber of Commerce's River Committee; the Leadership Petaluma'program, and have taught.Petaluma;History' in the; ,Petaluma 'Adult Education course;"The Petalumen's of Yesteryear-III:" `Archaeological Resource. Service has undertaken several archaeological and histbrical'evalustions, in Petaluma': Our staff.has been responsible for'recording rea recording as necessary, and revisiting almost all of the prehistoric archaeological sites in the .area. We, have previously worked for and advised the, Department of Parrks and Recreation and'other city agencies. Wec.recently completed an ArcView: GIS map of the Downtown Petaluma National Register District, and our consulting Historian, Dr. Don •, 'Napoli was_responsible for•identifying and nominating the districfto'the National Register. + , ei'�M _ a g it tr° K . _ : i r a. 4 { _ - i1 i •if iH f • PROPOSED METHODOLOGIES All researchcwili be performed accordance-with the Secretary"ofthe,Interior's standards. Prier to initiating the field evaluation, we;will contact all local preservation groups and all Native,American organizations listed by the,Native'American Heritage Commission. . . We will perform a,literature.check through'the California Historical tinfoil-nation Resources System at Sonoma State University We will .uSe the results supplied by`them as our check of"the Regional Office of the Office of Historic",.Preservation. This irifermation will:be.supplerriented'' by information from the files of Archaeological Resource,Service. The field evaluation for archaeology will,consist.of examining all`,exposed soils.within:the proposed project; as shown on the map supplied by your office. If it appears appropriate to do so;soil samples will be taken from the surface. The samples will be taken using:a 1 inch diameter; hollow core soil probe. Where possible,,the soiliptug will be replaced in the hole;;after examination. The field evaluation for;historic';arehitecture will consist of an examination of standing structures to determine the potential eligibility to the National Register of Historic 'Places. As part of the evaluation, it Will be detennined ''Whether an historic district should be defined for 'the downtown ' Novato area. Both the archaeological survey report and architectural evaluatienwirbe produced to meet current federaltstandards. ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION • Archaeological excavation,if necessary Will; 'consist.of excavatingzthe,requisite number or volume of archaeological test units.and/or hand augerbores within th6[poiential impact area of the project Each test unit<willYmeasure 15(1 meter iMgurfade`area, and be excavated in 10 cm. levels, or natural strata if appropriate. Excavation Will bewcarried;"to the base of the cultural deposit. All recovered soils Will be processed by screening to remove artifacts and other constituents. The mesh of screen used will vary with soil conditions. In most cases the mesh used Will be.:125 inches (1/8'inch), but in no case will the mesh be larger-Mart .25 'inches (1\4 inch)'.„ If appropriate, soils retained in the screens will be transported tojthelArchaeological'Resource Service laboratory for further processing. If it appears.appropriate to do so;'additionai;soil samples will be taken from the surface of the parcel, from the excavated unit(s), and%orfrbmaugeror•probesamples,af depth in the parcel. HAND AUGERING Hand augering,,if necessary, will ;be carried out using a fouror, five:inch diameter twist type hand auger. Excavation will occur. in ,10 cm. intervals,,or natural strata;,as appropriate. Excavation will be carried to the base of the cultural deposit., All recovered soils will be processed by screening to remove artifacts`andyother constituents. The mesh of:screen used will vary with•,soil conditions. In most cases the mesh used will be .125 inches (1/8 inch) but in no case wilithe.mesh be larger than 25 inches (1\4 inch). if, appropriate, soils retained in the screens will be transported to the Archaeological Resource Service laborato y for'further processing:. Some subsurface samples may be taken using a 1 inch diameter, hollow core soil probe. Where possible, the soil plug„will be replaced in the hole after examination. MECH. ANIZED TEST EXCAVATION . Mechanized testing .procedures such as backhoe excavation or mechanized borings, may be necessary over the course.of the project. In all cases, the smallest equipment appropriate to the • task will be used Mechanized:excavation will be used to identify presence or absence of cultural deposits, and cannot be used to evaluate the condition or significance of archaeological deposits. • „ • -; • . ,„ • • -..7•4/44.11,1-401,C:''',• • • . . ARCHAEOLOGICAL'MONITORING ArchaeolOgicaLthcinitering,;if needed,will be performed;under-the procedures Outlined;beICW:' • :Monitoring'will consist of directly.'watching, the major excavation_process: Menitoring will occur during the entire work day, and will continue on a daily basis 'until a depth of • excavation has been reached at which resources could not occur, This‘.depth. is estimated = as! usually abbut five feet below .grade at the beginning of the project, 'but may require modification in specifi&cases, and will be determined by the monitoring archaeologist based ontbserVed Soil Conditions. • Spot checks will consist of partiel'monitoring of the progress of excavation over the course of the project. During spot checks all spoils material, open excavations recently ;grubbed' areas other soil disturbences`Will be inspected. The frequency and duration of spot checks will be based on the relative sensitivity of the exposed soils and active work areaei Thernonitoring.archaeologist will determine the relative sensitivity of thebercel. • If prehistoric human interments (human burials).are encountered Within the hatiVe soils of • the :parcel, all work should' be halted in the ;immediate vicinity of the find: The County Coroner project superintendent; and the Agency Liaison should be contacted immediately. • The procedures to be followed at this point are prescribed by law. • If significant cultural deposits other than human burials are encountered; the project should be modified to .allow, the artifacts or features to be left in plebe; or the archaeological • . consultant iShoUld, Undertake the 'recovery of the deposit or feature. :Significant CultUral • deposits ate defined as archaeological featUres br.erfifects that associate,WithitheThrehistorit Period, the.histono•era Mission and Pueblo Periods and the American era up to about 1900: • A representative Ofthe Native American community,should be contacted in all cases where prehistoric or historic era Native American resources areinvolved. • Whenever the monitoring'archaeologist suspects that potentially significant.cultural remains or human burials have',been;enCountered, the piece of equipment that', encounters the suspected deposit will be Otepped, and the excavation inspected by the monitoring arehdeblogiet If suspected remains prove to be nonsignificant or non.cultural in Origin, work will immediately. If the SUOpebted, remains OVe-to be part of a' depoSit, all Work should, be: halted in that location until has been adeomPliehed. IfbUmeh remains,(bdrialS) are found, the Counly'COrdnerniUst be contacted so that he ,(or a designated representatiVe) can .evaluate the ,diecovered.'remains arid irriplement proper Contadts With pertinent Atheridan;repreSentatiVes. • Equipment stoppages will only involve those pieces of equipment that have actually encountered; significant'or"pdteptially:isignificantiideposite- and should net be construed.to mean e"stoppage of all equipment on the Oiteunless the cultural-deposit covers the entire building site, • During temporary equipmeht stoppages brought about to examine suspected remains, the erchabblogistshOuld accombliOh the necessarytaakewitn all due epeed. MEETING ATTENDANCE Meetings to discusethe;project's.progress, anditelephone consultations'are-notpart of this estirhate They will be billed at the quoted rates,above the estimated cost of this project:- Meetings have a minimum of 4 hours billable time and telephone consultations will be billed to the •nearest five, mincites. •• • . , :• . • u - t y , q"A, 'n I 1 y - H, 5 `i i 4t if 14ti- fr • • • .. TIME FOR COMPLETION We ,can 'complete the cultural. resources evaluation for this project^within 30 working days of our 'receipt of your notice to proceed. A more rapid response is available, at additional cost, if needed. Additional tasks, if needed,will,be completed inthe time frame:agreed to'when workis approved. If this correctly sets forth your needs, we fare prepared to begin'the,evaluation on receipt of your authorization. Thank you for this opportunity to participate in'your'project. If you have any,questions or comments regarding any aspect of this letter or the attached 'information, please contact Archaeological Resource Service. - INSURANCE COVERAGES • Archaeological:Resource Service maintains'a $1,000;000,00 General[Aggregate Liability policy, with coverage to $1,000,000.00 per occurrence: We also maintain full commercial coverage for all scheduled, hired, and non-owned'vehicles• operated by any of our staff: All of our staff are fully covered to the statutory limit. ($1;000,000:00) for workers compensation and employers liability insurance: A certificate of insurance can be',issued directly from our carrier if required. If specific language is required in any coverage appropriate arrangements can be made"for its inclusion in any required certificate of insurance. Any cost resulting from additional insurance requirements will be passed on and added to the cdstestimate.. BASIS OF COST ESTIMATE INITIAL EVALUATION AND,REPORT • LITERATURE SEARCH • Personnel Cormitment: ProjectDirector Literature Search+Fee: $60.00 Time For completion: 6hour Estimated-Cost: $ 612'100 FIELD EVALUATION • Personnel Commitment Project Director 3 Techniciari(s) Time.For completion: 6'hours • Estimated Cost $1,483:50 REPORT PREPARATION Personnel Commitment: 1Project.:Director Time',Forcompletion: .36;flours Estimated.Cost: $3;312.00 • ESTIMATED COST OF THE_EVALUATION $5,407.50 . • • • jaFi . •r'S iA€° tc9S _ TM LittehttePtiOgi.009 740\_. • gehOie. elk>l';�►� PROFESSIONAL RESUMEOF . ARCHAEOLOGICAL 'RESOURCE SERVICE • PROVIDED SERVICES ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SERVICE (ARS) offers consultation on:a variety,of services involving both:historic and prehistoric cultural resources. Services provided by the firm include ithe following: • FIELD RECONNAISSANCE • .SIGNIFICANCE'"EVALUATION' • ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MAPPING • .• .SUBSURFACE TESTING'.PROCEDURES • • CULTURAL,RESOURCE SENSITIVITY MODELING • 'DESIGN OF-ARCHAEOLOGICAL MITIGATION PROCEDURES • ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY(MITIGATION) EXCAVATION • CONSTRUCTION MONITORING AND DATA RECOVERY • . ARTIFACT CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS • DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTERIZED+CATALOGUE SYSTEMS, • MUSEUM DISPLAY, EXHIBIT,PLANNING AND DESIGN • • PREPARATION OF DATABASE"OF CULTURAL RESOURCE DOCUMENTS',. AND DOCUMENT.STATUSREPORTS FIRM'S EXPERIENCE Archaeological Resource Service has been conducting cultural resource evaluations under°;the present management'of,Katherine S. Flynn and William G. Roop since 1974. The firm,has"completed;,over 2000 consultations!in,the:'State of CaliforniaSince,January 1975. These projects have included,all aspects of cultural resource management. The extensive regional experience of.Archaeological Resource ,Service, has given us the technical expertise'to providelguick and"accurate.service to all clients.. 'We maintain and continually update our database;so that we can accurately assess: • The distribution of cultural.resources within any specific property; • The:compositionsand integrity of'discovered!cultural resources; • The eligibility of specific cultural .resources to the, National Register of Historic Places or • other local, county or state registers listing histoncillandmarks or sites;, • The most:appropriate measures to avoid or mitigate:potential impacts to cultural resources: Since 1973 Archaeological Resource Service has provided input on municipal and county general plan •" elements, assessments of archaeological sensitivity, cultural resource assessment, and general consultation on`regionalimodeling of cultural resourcedistribution and function. 122 American Alley,'Suite,A Petaluma,Califomia 94952 (707)7627.2573-p FAX(707)762-1791 n x a ; ¢ l Professional.Resume cif ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SERVICE,PETALUMA October 2000 • The Archaeological Resource Service library contains numerous documents pertaining to soils, hydrology, geology; geomorphology andinatural history as well'.as historic topographic and geodetic survey maps • which can be utilized in'order to understand the distribution.and function, of cultural resources in their environmental context.- VVhiler our particular geographic specialization centers around the greater San P Francisco Bay region, related to'the firm's geographic,location'in'the.,North Bay area the collection also includes pertinent natural' historical and socio-cultural data on central and southern California, Baja California, the Pacific Northwest, the`Great'basin, and:the!Plains. - Archaeological Resource Service maintains an extensive inventory of field and•laboratory equipment to handle a variety of field circumstances. The firm pioneered the definition of site boundaries using hand augers and designed'specialized field survey, excavation, construction monitoring, and'data recordation techniques to deal with the various kinds of Cultural°resources that May be;foundtduring the development process. Archaeological PResource Service:maintains its own laboratory facilities where the analysis'of the bulk of material recovered from survey',and testing'. takes' place. Laboratory technicians, graphic artists, and photographers.assistiiin the analysis of recovered.artifacts. We maintain a conservation laboratory where materials such,as animal bones °as well-as metal or,glass are cleaned, reconstructed, classified, and preserved' for comparative purposes or museum;display. We also assist private and public clients in arranging temporary or permanent-storage:facilities for analyzed`collections..We also assist museums in complying with the ;provisions of the federal Native America iGrave Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in regards the properttreatmentano disposition of human skeletal remains that may be held in the museums' possession. In December 1994, we announced the.availability;of a new service called the Document Status Report, now on line, The Document Status Report's designed to determine;whether of not a Cultural,Resources Evaluation has been completed'for;anyparcel being„investigated for a public or private client. If the study finds that an evaluation has been'.made, the report determines if any cultural resources were identified. The evaluation consists of a'search of the,compiled Database of Cultural Resource Documents to list whether or not an archaeological report or.other document,has+been prepared on a target parcel. The Database of Cultural Resource Documents is an electronic -database listing all+ archaeological reports completed as.-part of an environmental evaluation. The databaseainaludesibibliographic'information.and the official designation of any resource identified:in adecument The:cultural`resource database is updated constantly by our staff. Official 'records maintained by the State: of- California, the federal government, and local agencies are examined on a reptile( basis..Curfently, the following listings are included in the+search.mode: •, California Archaeological site record flies • California Historic Landmarks • National'Register of Historic Places California Register of Historic Places•• National-Register or Engineering Achievements • Appropriate county and city lists of'historic places or . Historic American Engineering Record landmarks. Records are currently'maintained'for•the following 18-counties inmorthern California: Alameda, Colusa, Contra.Costa, Del Norte; Humboldt;[Lake; Mann, Mendocino,'Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco', San Mateo„Santa'Clara', SantaCruz, Solano;,Sonorria; and Yolo. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Both of the'Archaeologidal Resource Service principals, Katherine Flynnand William Roop, were listed in the latest DIRECTORY OF CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL ARCHEOLOGISTS, published by The Society of Professional PArcheologistg. This listing is currently being replaced by the Registry Of Professional Archaeologists, forwhichiwe are applying. Other professional memberships include'the`following: 2 • 2.1;. {{tyrra4t 1 ? , a e "',AV 2 - Professional Resume of ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SERVICE'PETALUMA .±' Obtobef'2000 • Societyfor;California Archaeology Pacific!Coast.Archaeological Society Chinese.Historical Society'of America Society'for-American Archaeology' Chinese,Historical and Cultural Group. SonomaCounty Museum Association :Society for.Historical Archaeology Lassen CountiHistorical'Society California Council for:the Promotion-of History Novato-History Guild . San,Jose Historical Museum.Association' California Native Plant-Society San Luis Obispo Co: ArchaeologicalSociety; California HistoricalSociety, Vallejo Navaland,Historical'Museum Association Sonoma County Alliance American::Societyof:Conservation:Archaeologists Sonoma,Land Trust `' . SELECTED CLIENTELE I Clients utilizing: our .services include a variety of federal, state and' local, agencies,, members of the erMvironmentali planning community such as.civil engineers,'soil .scientists, and ardhitectural-fitms, and 'private individuals whomave been required by various agencies to prepare a,report on their-property's archaeolo ieal sensitivity. • FEDERAL AGENCIES _, Interagency., gi U S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service U S Department of the Interior; National Park Service, Archeolo icalServices U.S. Navy,'Western•Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command (San Bruno) • U_S. Air Force (Travis Air Force-Base, Fairfield, Solano County) ' U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,San Francisco Regional office . • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Sacramento and Auburn„offices) U.S. Coast,Guard 12th,District (San Francisco and Oakland) StATE'AGENCIES • California'State;L"ands'Go_mmission . . California State'Dept.,of Fish and Game - California;State Dept.of Transportation California StateiCoastal Commission ' California`PublicttilitiesComrfiission California State Dept iof Parks:and;Recreation REGIONAL, COUY NT AND MUNICIPAL-AGENCIES Departments;of,Public Works,Counties'ofi; Alameda Humboldt Napa SanMateo, -t Butte Marin Nevada Santa Clara 'I ContrarCosta Mendocino Placer Santa,Cruz Del Norte Monterey' San'Benito San Joaquin San.Francisco Sonoma Departments;of Planning, Cities oft • - . ;Calistoga Larkspur Roseville Santa Rosa .Corte Madera' Milpitas St. Helena Sausalito Dixon Mill`Valley' Salinas Sonoma Fort Bragg Morgan'Hill' San,Jose Vacaville 'Fremont . Monterey San Francisco Vallejo Napa San Luis Obispo po Watsonville G • reenfield' Novato Santa Clara San Juan,Ba utista: Hollister Petaluma Santa Cruz Woodland • 3 _ �t t y dd t Professional Resume of ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SERVICE;PETALUMA ':` ., . , 70ctober"2000 • Redevelopment Agencies, Cities of Monterey SahlJose 'Salinas.San Luis;Obispo Willits Other Agencies and Departiiients- Co. of Santa Clara, Transportation,Agency SantaClara Co. Water District City of San Jose Dept. of`PUblic'Works East Bay'Municipal Utility District East Bay Regional ParkslDistrict Sonoma Co. Water Agency City and County of.San Francisco Santa,ROSeIDept..Of'Utilities Alameda Co..Flood Control District: SantaTRosafDept,.ofPublic Works Marin Municipal'WaterDistrict: Mid-Peninsula.Open Spece-District Novato Parks-and Recreation District Greater and Recreation District Roseville Parks and Recreation District Petaluma Parks and Recreation District PRIVATE FIRMS OR,INDIVIDUALS Ausonio Construction Co'. (Castroville) Christopherson Homes (Santa Rosa) Charles W. Davidson Company (Ban Jose) .Southwest'Diversified (Brisbane) CSW/Stuber-Stroeh, Inc. (Novato) Ira':Fink;&Associates(Emeryville) Reservation Ranch (Smith-River, Del Norte.Co.) Ray Carlson &Associates (Santa Rosa) New Cities Development Company (Monterey) CI-1,2M Hill, Inc: Common Ground Land Planning;Services,(Santa Rosa) MH Engineering! • Adobe Associates (Santa Rosa) Kaufman and Broad; South Bay; Inc. Young America Homes,(Santa.Rosa) Kaufmanand Broad of Fresno Inc. The Chambers Group (Irvine) Harding;Lawson,Associates, Inc CarlileAMacy (Santa••Rosa) Winzler/Kelly°(Santa„Rosa) Lescure Engineers Phelps &Associates, Inc. (Sebastopol) Environmental,Sciende:ASSOciates The/Planning Collaborative Kent Watson and Associates • • • S 4 . . . • • • ' I 7 Professional Resume of ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SERVICE ' October 2000 • ATTACHMENT 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SERVICE BASIC FEE SCHEDULE rincipal Investigator................................... $80:00/hour Field/Laboratory Diredior....... .............. $60'.00/hour Archaeological Monger $50:06/hour „ Field/Laboratory Technician $45,00/hour FielO/Laboratory ..... ......... $3.5:00/hour Mileage expenses...... .................,......... .$6.35 per mile Perdieritexpenses•(per person).......,.... $45-95.00 • Per diem expenses will"vary according to project specific needs, project local.costs, and . Seasonal variations in availability and cost"of lodging and/or rneals. Native AmerFcan •Consultant: . Not billed by,Archaeological Resource Service, This fee should be negotiated directly between theprospictive Native Americen.Conbultant and the project sponsor. Literature: earches. $-60:00 per hour institution fee, plusnime and reproduction Costs. Standard ARS,Overhead - - • „ . . 25% of direct labor cost. Overhead cost has been'calculated into the hourlykrates guotethaboye. Project Responsibility The Principal Investigator iresponsible fOr overall supervision of all field and laboratory work and preparation of written documentation. The ,Principal Investigator may be assisted by one or more researchers or assistants according to the tasks necessary for completion,of a specific project.- The above fee schedule relates to literature search; field survey, monitoring, and spot'check procedures. Costs for test 'excavalions and laboratory 'analysis, utilize the same hourly :rates; ‘but-may include additional personnel categories or specific expenses. •• • 5 • • WILLIAM G . ,ROOP � AR.CHAEOL:OG;I'CAL RESOURCE: SERVICE • 122 AMERICAN,ALLEY, 'SUITE A, 'P'E`TALUMA , CS 9'4,952 Office : ( 707 ) "762 -257'3./ ( 707) 762 - 1791 facsimile. Home ( 707 ) 935 -..812`.S - • SUMMARY: Mr. Roop has more than25ryears'of experience ih project'management,and•archaeological methods. He has been engaged since 1972 in cultural resource 'management •and development of'procedures to comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy:Act,(NEPA) requirements. His•experiencethas'included completion of over 1,500:reports evaluating,the;potential for or impacts to, cultural resources. His- tenure at Archaeological :Resource Ser'ice has included participation in', and responsibility.for, all aspects of cultural resource management. Mr. Roop is computer literate; with experience in word processing, spreadsheet, and database. management. software. HO has produced interpretive software packages'for general 'distribution, and compiled dBase Programs for internal use at Archaeological Resource Service. Programming :skills include familiarity with the HyperBase environment; and a working 'knowledge of Cogent Prolog, All database programs currently are using a Microsoft Access format: ACCOMPLISHMENTS: q> Coordination of excavation'and laboratory crews of up;to 45 people. S tt> Development of new methodologies'for data recordation and recovery. q> Major author of thelNovate Cultural Resources Ordinance. q> Author of the Cultural Resources Element of the 1995=2005' Downtown•San Jose General Plan. • Identified and evaluated (with Katherine Flynn).,a previously unrecognized pattern of . prehistoric exploitation ofvernal'wetlands. • Development of computerized systems for data mani pulation and retrieval. EXPERIENCE: 1974-present: Partner,Arch aeological Resource Service, 122.American Alley,Suite A, Petaluma, CA 94952 In.charge of supervising all aspects of company business., Specific duties include acquisition of new projects,, oversighteof the computer systems, direct supervision of projects in progress, and preparation of report's,to clients. The'general service:area of,the°firm extends,from an Luis Obispo County north to the Oregon state line, and east to2the Nevada State line; Occasional projects;have been undertOken beyond this area, including a special interest in the Black Rock and Smoke Creek:Deserts of Nevada. Concurrent Position 1991-1997: Pa_rtner, ABACUS Archaeological,Associates (a WBE), 1110 Industrial Avenue, Suite 27, Petaluma, CA.,. 94952-6511 ' 1991-1997: Chief Executive Officer'-and. Software Designer, Nexial Software Systems, 11,10 Industrial ® Avenue;Suite 27, Petaluma,;CA., 94952-651.1 Designs„Produces arid'Sells local histories on disk. Products have iihcluded histories of the Mare Island.Naval Shipyard, San Jose's Chinese communities„database applications for data retrieval and artifact cataloging, and a morphological key to prehistoric tools. •RESUME OF WILLIAM G_.ROOP • (707)762-2573 NOVEMBER,2000 • • 1972-1974: Field Team;Leader,_Archasological.Resource Service ,. • Supervise and execute archaeological surveys, ztest: excavations,., and data: recovery. projects under the direction of Dr. Thomas FullingiKing. Laboratory coordination and report'preparation also occupied'a large part'ofthe!work,perforrried. EDUCATION:. Degrees 1978 Masterof Arts; San.Francisco State•University Anthropology Thesis: ADAPTATION ON BEN LOMOND MOUNTAIN'. Excavations,at 04=SCr=20 1970, Bachelor of Arts San Francisco State;Univ!;, 'Anthropology 1968 San Jose City:College General Studies Licenses: 1982-1995 Certified'by the SocietyOf Professional.Archeologists.in Field.Research •; 1990 11995 Class C California-'Drivers License • PROFESSIONAL,MEMBERSHIPS Society of Professional,Archeologists California Council For the.Promotion of History California Historical-Society Nevada.Histoncal,Society, Society:forCalifornia.Archaeology Society for American Archaeology • Chines&Historical-Society:of Arnerica Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Lassen County Historical Society Novato„History Guild Chinese Historical and Cultural Project California Academy of Sdiendesl California.Native,Plant Society • Sonoma'County'Museum•Association Petaluma:Historidal:Museum-Association San Jose Historical Museum',Association Planning and Conservation League Sonoma CountyAlliance • Vallejo=Naval and Historical Museum'Association Association of.Environmental Professionals (Charterrmember) Charles Babbage Institute, Center for the History pf Information Processing Society for the,History of Technology Special Interest Group in the Historyof,Computing Society forthe History of Technology, Special Interest Group in History of Military Technology PUBLICATIONS.AND PRESENTATIONS: Publications: • ,1978: HERITAGEON THE"HALFSHELL: Excavations'at Mnt-298 (witn K. Flynn and others)' 1984: THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF: POOLS: An Example;from•Placer County:,ln S Jain and P._Moyle,(Editors)'Verna_I Pools and Intermittent Streams: Institute of Ecology Publication 28. U.C. Davis. • 1989: Archaeological;Data Recovery at CA-Sol-313'Witlin the Proposed Travis Air Force Base Medical",Facility; Fairfield, Solaho County, California, Final-Report:(with K Flynn and Others) • in preparation: (tentative.title)`Who KillediUocle Pete? Interpretations:and Rurriinations oaths Deaths•of Edward Clapperand Peter Lassen. Presentations: 1974: Excavations,at SCr-20 a Preliminary,Report.,Paper presented to the Society For California' Archaeology Annual Meeting, Riverside. I Il ;, 2 1 • • aft f l r 1.' f x •}I y .k • • • • RESUME OF WILLIAM•G ROOP (707)762-2573 " NOVEMBER 20u0 j • 197:5:The Aptos Model, Predicting Site Sensitivity. Paper:presented to,the'Society For California Archaeology Annual Meeting,,SantaiCruz. 1979i Shrimps, Shrubsrand Shrinking PoolsrVernal Pool"Exploitation in Prehistoric California. Paperoresented. toithe:Sediety ForCalifomia:Archaeology Annual'Meeting,rSacramento. 1981: Pooling OurResources:rA-Deeper Look at Vernal`Pools. Symposium'presented to the Society For California Archaeology Annual'Meeting,:Redding. Papers presented: The Distribution of Vernal,Pools in California--Geography,Geology; and Implications to Cultural Behavior(N/, Roop) Islands In The Land --Vernal Pools and,Land`,Use;in Prehispanic California (W. Roop) 1981: The Archaeology of'Vemal,Pools: An'Example From PlacerCounty..Presented to the Institute Of Ecology, U'IC. Davis: Published:in Moyle;and:Jain (eds.) 1984. 1985: Artifacts'from the FairmontCollection. Slide:presentation, artifact?display'and discussion of the San Jose Fairmont:HotetArchaeological Project presented to representatives of the Chinese women's dubs of Santa Clara County. 1987: San Jose's First:Chinatowrr.,Slide.presentation and discussion of the San.Jose Fairmont Hotel Archaeological Project presented to:the San Jose-Historical Museum Association. 1987: Artifacts of San Luis Obispo`s Chinatown, Exhibit of artifacts,from San'Luis Obispo's Chinatown;presented atithe San Luis Obispo CountyiHistorical,Museum. Produced with Katherine Flynn and Mark"Hall-Patton, Curator" 1989:' San Jose's First Chinatown.;Slide presentation°and discussion (with Katherine Flynn) of the San JosefFairmont Hotelland the adjacent:Silicon Valley,Financial Center Archaeological Projects. Presented to:the Chinese Historical Society of America. • 1991: A History of Petaluma and the River. Paper presented to the Petaluma;River Enhancement Committee ofthe:Cityof Petaluma. Petaluma. 1994: Petaluma Underground..Slide presentation and discussion of'historical.archaeology as practiced by ARS....Presented to the PetalumaMuseum Guild. 1996: Underground'Petaluma,Presented to Class 2'of,Leadership Petaluma. Discussion of Petaluma prehistory,and;history to 1850 with an emphasis archaeological-sites and buildings that no longer.exist. Presented with "Aboveground Petaluma;" a discussion of historicbuildings'of=the Downtown PetalurriaaHistoric District•by Deborah Riddle of the Petaluma MIJset n'I Msbbiatioh. 1997: Waking'the,Dragbrui Community Involvemenfin the'San.JoSe Chinatown Archaeological Project. Paper and.slide'presentation in Sessioni30 Working Together:. Historical Archaeologists;and Minority Communities.'Presented January 10, 1997 at the Society for Histotica[A"rchaeology-30th Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Corpus Christi, Texas: 1997=2000: ',Petaluma's.History Presented to Class"3, 4, 5„and.6'of Leadership Petaluma. Discussion of Petaluma prehistory'and history to 1850,withfan emphasis on archaeological;:sites and buildings:that no longer exist. 'Presented with'a.discussion of historic cbuildingsroffthe Downtown Petaluma Historic District by Deborah Riddle of the Petaluma MuseurnAssociation, and a guided tourof Vallejo's'Petaluma,Adobe. CIVIC/PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:, 1995-1999: Member of the Citizen's Advisory Committee of the Sonoma County Agricultural ;Preservation and Open Space'District 1994-1995`. Member of the 11th'Class of the LEADERSHIP SANTA,ROSA Program. 3 • • RESUME OF WILLIAMG._ROOP (707)762-2573 NOVEMBER,2000 1992-1998: Second Vice President, 1994-1995,and Merriber.of the Board:of Directors of the Chinese Historical Society bf America, 1993-1998. Member of the Speakers subcommittee. Chairman'oftherArchivescommittee and Keeper of the Archives of the,Chinese;Historical Society ofArnerica, 1994-1996. 1991''1994: Merriberof:the.Board.of Directors of the Petaluma River Council 1991-1999: Member of the Sonoma County Alliance, Served on the Low Cost;Housing,Element Task Force (1992-93), Low,Cost Housing:subcommittee (19-93-94); Land Use subcommittee (1993-95)and Infra-Structure'Committee (1996-99); 1991-1994: Advisor to Hahn Elementary School, Rohnert Park, Archaeology Program. 1990-1997: Member;of the.Advisory'Board, Chinese'Historical and Cultural Project of Santa Clara County: Assisted In the development and preparation of the interpretive display and exhibition materials for the Ng Shing Gung temple restoration project at the City of San JoseHistoncal,Museum at Kelley'Park. 1990-1991: Exhibits Committee of the CHCPtprojecf[to recreate the Ng"Suing Gung Temple]. 1989-1994:.Participantin Novato Sister City Program'(Sister City, Shepparton, Australia).. 1989-.1991:-Archaeology class, Olive Elementary School, Novato. Taughtiarchaeological principles and laboratory methods to elementary school children. 1979-1980:;Member, Novato City Cultural_Resource Ordinance Committee. 1975-1980:':Member, Black Point Home.Improvement Club. 1976-1981:Mehiber, Novato Environrriental:Irnpact;Review Committee: 1975-1976':CoMmissioner, Marin County N'ative.American-Archaeological Community • Coo erative Committee. • 1974: Director,of the Bay Area Archaeological Cooperative. REFERENCES , Ms Sharon Wright, Executive Director of the)Sbnoma County Alliance, (707)525-8377. Mr. Jeff Foster, Chief Engineer, City of SantatRosa Department of PublicWorks (707)-524-5135. Mr. Charles Carson, Executive, Director; Northern: Division; Home Builders.Association of Northern California (707);544-7100. • • 4 • t?: r; • • • • KATHERINE S FLYNN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE SERVICE 122 AMERICAN ALLEY, SUITE A PETALUMA, 'CA. 94952=2328 Office: (707) '762-2573/707-762-1791 fax Home: (707) 935-8128 SUMMARY: Ms. Flynn has more than 25 years'of'experience'in project management and archaeological.methods. She has been engaged since 1973 in cultural resource nianageriment and development of procedures to comply with California Environmental Quality 'Act (CEQA) end National Environmental Policy Act, (NEPA) requirements:. Her experience has included completion of almost 1:000 reports evaluating the potential for or impacts to cultural resources., Her tenure.at Archaeological Resource. Service has included participation:in, and responsibility for all aspects of:cultural resource management. In 1991 she started a Women's Business Enterprise (WBE)}under ABACUS Archaeological Associates (AAA). The firm maintains a staff of five,permanent employees and as well as other technical specialists as needed. ACCOMPLISHMENTS{ • Coordination of excavation and aboratery'crews of up to 45`people. Developmentof new methodologies for data recordation and,recovery: • t1�' Faunal analysis (animal bone) specialist'since 1972. v Scientific illustrator'since 1974. q> Identified and evaluated (with William Roop) a previously unrecognized pattern of prehistoric exploitation;of vernal wetlands. Participant in the California Council For The Promotion of History-Mini-Grant committee through 1998. • EXPERIENCE: 1974-2000 Partner • Archaeological Resource.Servioe, 122 American Alley, Suite A, Petaluma, CA: 94952-2328 In charge of supervising all aspects of company _business: Specific duties include acquisition of new projects, oversight of the computer systems; direct supervision of projects in progress, and preparation of reports to clients The general service;area of the firm extends from San Luis+Obispo°Countynorthrto the;Oregon state line, andheast to the Nevada State-line. • Concurrent Position: 1991-1997`.'Chief Executive Officer and Senior Partner ABACUS Archaeological Associates,(WBE) • • • _ PROFESSIONAL RESUME Katherine S. Flynn .November, 2000 EDUCATION': 1973 Master of Arts, University of .California at Los Angeles:. Interdisciplinary Committee in • Archaeology. Thesis: The Hunter-Gatherer as Incipient Animal Domesticator: Theoretical Investigation of Pleistocene Archaeological:Sites.; 1970 Bachelor'ofArts BeloifCollege, Beloit, Wisconsin Anthropology (with Honors). • • Licenses; 1982-1997 Certified by the Society'of Professional Archeologists in Field Research • PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Society of Professionar'Archeologists California Academy of Sciences Society for California,Archaeology California Native Plant Society Society for,American'Archaeology Planning and Conservation League_ Pacific Coast-Archaeological Society Sonoma County Alliance National Trust For Historic Preservation Sonoma County Farmlands Group California Preservation,Foundation Sonoma Land Trust California Council'FortheiPromotion of History Petaluma Historical Museum Association Association of Environmental Professionals Sonoma County Museum Association • Chinese Historical Society'of America San Jose Historical Museum Association California Historical Society Nevada Historical Society San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society Vallejo.Naval'and Historical Museum'Association PUBLICATIONSAND PRESENTATIONS: Publications: 1978 HERITAGE ON THE HALFSHELL:'Excavations at Mnt-298 (with W. Rcop and "others) 1989:Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-Sol-313 Within,the.Proposed Travis Air,Force ,Base`Medical Facility, Fairfield,'Solano County, California. Final.Report'(with'W. Roop 'and.others) Presentation :' - 1974 Faunal Remains Recovered From SCr-20, a Preliminary Report.,on the Faunal Analysis.,Presented at the Society For"California Archaeology Annual Meeting, ;Riverside. • 19 5 p On The Ridg _Excavations aum-2 and H um- 246 on Hupa Mountain. er pr the o i nt aAnthropological te Association and American Anthropological AssociationAnnual Meeting,San Francisco. 1978::. The,Rock Artlof.Santa Clara County: Form,and•Function. Paper'presented:to,the Annual"Meeting of the Society of California Archaeology Annual Meeting,,Yoseniite. 1985:,ArchaeologicaLReconnaissance and Mitigation Procedures. Paperpresented to the Redwood Chapter of the-Association of Consulting Civil Engineers, Santa Rosa. • a • PROFESSIONAL RESUME Katherine S. Flynn November', 2000 1987: San•Jose's First'Chinatown: Slide presentation and discussion of the San Jose Fairmont Hotel'Archaeological ProjectiandQhe adjacent Silicon Valley'Financial Center .Archaeological Project presented to the San Luis Obispo county Archaeological Society. 1987: Artifacts of San Luis Obispo's'Chinatown. Display of artifacts from San Luis Obispo's Chinatown Display presented at,the�San Luis:Obispo County Historical Museum. Produced with William Roop and.Mark.Hall-Patton, Curator • 1988:. Napa County Prehistory..Paperpresented to the Sharpsteen Museum Society, Calistoga, Napa County. 1989:, San Jose's FirstiChinatown, Slide presentationian&discussion(with William Roop) on the.San Jose'FairmonttHotel and the adjacent Financial Center Archaeological Projects.'Presented to the Chinese Historical of America., San Francisco chapter,. 1989: Prehistory-of,th'eNovato Area. Paperpresented to the Breakfast Club of the Rotary, Novato. 1990: Womenlif.North Bay History. Paper presented:to the North Bay W Women's Breakfast Club. Novato: 1991: The Prehistory of,Petaluma and the River,.,Paper.presented to the Petaluma River Enhancement Committee,,of the City of Petaluma: Petaluma: • 1991: The Common Thread: Linkage Between Archaeology and Geology. Paper presented to the A"ssobiation of Engineering'Geologists;,,San Fran Cisco (With J. Parsons). 1992: Program Chairperson, Third Petaluma River Forum. River Committee of the Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce. 1994: Archaeology and the Construction Industry:. We Don't Have to Stop,the Show. Paper presented'to'the'National Organization;of Women in Construction (NAWIC), San Francisco Chapter#19. 1994: Program Co=Chairperson, California Council;forthe Promotion.of:History Mini-Grant Committee. Presentation to group#turn CCHP and California Historical Society on September 15, , • • 1996: Program Chairperson,California Council forthe•Promotion of History Mini-Grant Committee. Presentation to CCPH.on October.25, 1996 in Sacramento. CIVIC/PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: 1999: Chair; Petaluma Chamber of Commerce•Economic Development Committee . 1997-1999: Day Chair for History and Tourism Day City of Petaluma Area Chamber'of Commerce LEADERSHIP PETALUMA Program. Class 114. 1997: Member,Wake Up Petaluma Committee;,City`of Petaluma Area Chamber of'Comrnerce. 1995-1996: Participant, City df Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce LEADERSHIP PETALUMA . • Program. Class I. Participant in Mural Sub-committee 1996-97. 1991-1995 Member; Mini-grant Committee, California Council for the Promotion of History 1996-1997 Chairperson, Mini-grant Committee, California Council for the Promotion of History. 3 • 1PROFESSIONAL RESUME Katherine S. Flynn .November, 2000 .' 1993-1994:4 Participant, City'of Petaluma Eco-AuditlSustainable Petaluma Committee. 19931994: Participant, City of Santa,Rosa Wastewater;Management Workshops, 1991-1994: Participant, City of Petaluma Wastewater Management Workshops. Graduate of Wastewater,School. 1989-1993.- :Participant, City of Novato'Sinter`Cit/Program (Sister City with Shepparton,Australia). 1991-1992: Secretary and Member of the Board'ofhDirectors of the Sonoma County-Farmlands Group,,Also'Chair ofEducation committee:, 1991=1992: Member, the Petaluma Area Chamber,of,Commerce River Committee: 1989-1990: instructor, Special Archaeology class, Olive Elementary School, Novato. ?.: 1979-1980: 'Member, Novato City Cultural Resource Ordinance.Committee. 1975-1989: Member; Black Point Home-Improvement Club. 1976-1981': Advisor{ City of Novato Environmental Impact:Review Comrriittee. . 1975-1976: Member;: Marin County Native American-Archaeological Community Cooperation, Committee,; 1974: Mernber;,Bay'Area Archaeological'Cooperative: REFERENCES- ' Mr:-MarkiSloat, City ofiSanta Rosa Department of'Public Works (707) 524-5135 Mr:Will Selleck or Ms. Wyntress Balcher, Planners; Napa County!Conservation, Development;& Planning Department(707)'253-4416. • 4 .. 1 1 � k.. • `ERIC C. STROTHER • Archaeological'Resource;Service 122 American Alley, Suite A. Petaluma,CA 94952 2328 (707)762-2573 • • Education: 1995-1997 California State University Chico, Chico, CA May 1997 Bachelor'of'Arts: Anthropology 1991-1995 Santa Rosa Junior College,Santa Rosa;.CA. June 1995 Associate'of Science: NaturalScientes• Experience: June 1998 Archaeological Resource;Service,.Petaluma,.CA Present Archaeologist: Responsibilities:include:laboratory.curation,andanalysis,involving identification of bone elements and deteiniination between human.andanimal bone,burial excavation, analysis, and documentation,of human remains. Other responsibilities include on-going construction monitoring, angering and test unit excavation,;surveying,!research,report•writing;Photography,'Illustration,mapping, site specific data gathering at;the NorthwestInformation Center at Sonoma State University, • supervision ana training in field an&l'aboratory:procedures for interns and new employees. Interfacing with Native American Monitors. . April 1996- Physical Anthropology'Laboratory,.California State'University Chico,Chico,CA May 1997 Laboratory Assistant, Internsh'ip Researcli,and faunal analysis with experrence„distinguishing between human and non- . human remains: Identification and analysis of aichaeologicallcollection.while emphasizing•study of human,osteology: Forensicexperience;includes analysis, maceration andprocessing;of human/non-human remains,.FORDISK 2.0 software, supervising and-Mariagiiig.oihet interns. April 1996- Zooarchaeology Laboratory;California State;University'Chico,Chico,CA May 1997 Internship-research and faunal'collection analysis' Identification'and arrangement of faunal remain' emains from an archaeological context:. General faunal;research and identification in relation with Physical Anthropology Lab. Achievements: • Deans Honor List,College of Behavioral•and Social;Sciences,California State ,University Chico: Spring 1997: • References: Available Upon Request • • • Membersince,1998. • Professional Reports: • 1998, A Cultural Resources Evaluation•of,the Proposed Studio Plus',Hotel Project. Fountaingrove Parkwayand Mendocino Avenue,Santa Sonoma County, • California. Submitted byLaura Van'Blair and Eric Strother: Submitted for;Linda Bath-anchor-4 Architectural`Diniensions: ARS#98-51. Unpublished+manuscripfonfile at Northwest Infomiation;Centec at:Sonoma State•Unive'Sity under S=22011. 1998 'A Cultural Resources Evaluation`of the Property Located at,2102 Sp'ring:Hill Road,Petaluma,Sonoma County,California. Submitted for Mt Ronald L°avigna... ARS#98.53. Unpublished:niariitscript&rfile of Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. 1998,A:Cultural Resources^Evaluation.of the Santa Rosa'Creek'Trunk Sewer • Repair,•Santa Rosa,,Sonoma,County California. Submitted to'Terry Boyes, City;of • Santa+Rosa;Public Works Department, ARS#98=56. Unpublished manuscript on file.at • Northwest Information Center.atSonoma State University. 1999'Results of an Archaeological Monitoring Program'for the Wild Oak Stables Project,Wild Oak,SonomaiCounty,California. Submitted'by Eric Soother and • • William'Roop. Submittedrfor Jim Murphy&Associates. ARS#98-28. Unpublished' • maniiscript'on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University: 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation of the•MNS•98-0032 at 5700'Wildwood • Mountain Road,Santa Sonoma County. Submitted to Coralee Barkela;Coralee Barkela&Company. ARS#98 73. 'Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest. Information Center at Sonoma State;University under S-22017. 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation of 14025 Montebelld Road,.Santa Clara County,California. Submitted by Eric Strother and April Mousley. Submitted for,Mr. Ross.Jenson. ARS#99-01. Unpublished manuscript on.file at Northwest Information ' Center at Sonoma State,Univeistty.under-S 22018. 1999 A Cultural Resources`Evaluation of the Property at 8861 Cypress Avenue, Cotati,Sonoma County,MNS 98-004. Submitted for ML`Don Clark ARS#99-11. Unpublshed manuscript og':file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University under S-21446. 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation of the Fountain Grove Meadows PhaselFour Property at 2720 Riebli'Road„Santa Rosa,Sonoma County,MNS 90-597. Submitted for Mr Norman_Sliinabargar. ARS#`99=21 Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University'under 5-22025. • • 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation of the•LotLine Adjustment,Between'•the Lands of John,McCullbuglfand thetands,of-NormanPaulsen,.APN-028-060=004, 055,029-120-002 & 028-090-010,Santa Rosa,Sonoma County PLP'98-0102 (ACC/LLA). 'Submitted for:7ohmMcCullough,andRay Carlson&•Associates, Inc. ARS# 99,28. Unpublishedmanuscript on file:atNorthvest Information,Center'atSonoma State University under S-22028. 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation of the"Napa 218”Parcel,APN 057-090-59,in • theNapa County AirportIndustrial Area,Napa,Napa County. Submitted by Eric • Strother and Katherine-Flynn Subniitted.for Clem Lee,Beringer Wine Estates. ARS# • 2 • . . . • 99-17 Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center Sonoma State University.Under S:22036. . 1999 A;Cultural Resources Evaluation of the Lands of Christopherson,642 Middle Rincon Road,Santa'Rosa,Sonoma County,.California. Submitted for Denise Peter, Carlile-Macy. ARS#99-34. Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University: ' 1999 A,Cultural Resources Evaluation of the Lund"Ranch H Project,Pleasanton, California. Submitted by EricStrother and Amy McCarthy. Submitted for Michael Harlan,Greenbriar Fowler Road Company. ARS#99-41, Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. { 1999 A.Cultural Resources Evaluationof the CPN 99 0002,5685 Sierra Grande Road,BodegaBay, Sonoma County,California: Submitted`for Bruce Pierson, Salinas. ARS#99=51: Unpublished Manuscript on file at Northwestern Information Center at Sonoma State University. 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation of the Lands of Benedetti Brothers,2640 Calistoga Road,Santa Rosa,Sonoma County, California- Submitted for Douglas Dorman,-Dimensions 4 Engineering, Inc. and Ed''and,Tony Benedetti. ARS#99-47. Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University, 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation of the White;Cottage Ranch,Angwin,Napa County, California Submitted for Dennis and Adele Johns, 1217 Edwards Street, St. IP Helena,CA 94574 c/o Bartelt Engineering. ARS#99-65. Unpublished manuscript on file at.Northwest'Infoimation Center at Sonoma-State University. 1999 -A Cultural Resources Evaluation of the Lands of Stone,Forest,Knolls,Marin County,,Califorriia. Submitted`for'Mr. Les,Stone: ARS#99-67.'Unpubli"shed manuscript on-file at Northwest Information Center atlSonoma State University under S- 22042. 1999 ACultural Resources Evaluation of the'Lands'ofCatherine Heater,PLP 98- 0056:(ACC/LLA), 1825,1785&1875 Mohrhardt Ridge Tload,Cazadero,Sonoma County,California. Submitted by Eric Strother and Katherine Flynn: ,Submitted for Ms. Catherine Heater Cazadero,California. ARS#99.-63. Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest-Information Center at Sonoma State University: 1999 ACultural:Resources Evaluation of the.Proposed-,Redwood Crossroads Development,Petalunia, Sonoma County,California Submitted for.Frank J. Marmello G&W Management Company,Petaluma ARS#9980. Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. • . 1999 A.Cultural Resources.Evaluation of the West Steele"Lane Subdivision,Sonoma County, California. Submitted for Lee Smith;c/o Carlenzoliand , Associates, Santa Rosa. ARS#99,83. Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. • 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation of the Proposed "Tamalpias Hill"Project, Novato,Marin County,California. Submitted for Mark Minbim,c/o Christopher Craig, CSW/Stuber-Stroeh. ARS#99-77.Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University. 3 • r .1999 A,CulturahResources;EValuation of the Storage USA Project,Novato,Marin • County,California.. Submitted:fonCarol Whitmire Planner. ARS#99-91. Unpublished manuscript on file at+Northwest Information Center at Sonoma,State University under'S- 22103. Primary Number_21-000685. • 1999 A Cultural Resources Evaluation'of•the Proposed Stonegate•Subdivision,6022, • 6024 and 6050 Sonoma Highway,Santa-Rosa,(Sonoma County,California: Submitted for Jack Macy Carlile-Macy. •ARS#,'99 132. Unpublished manuscript on file,at Northwest Information Center.at Sonoma State University. 1999 A.Cultural Resources Evaluation of the Archaeological Sensitivity Surrounding the Le Trianon Resort,Blue Lakes,Lake•County,•California. ARS#99-951. Unpublished-manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at-Sonoma State, University. 1999 Results of an Archaeological Monitoring Program for the Extended Stay America'Number 8584,;100 Fountaingrove Parkway,Santa Rosa,Sonoma County, .A/12"/1.92;94.Unpublished manuscript on file at Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State:University. • • • • • • ^;l • • • • 4 . • { - . • • Cassandra Chattan 122 American Alley,Suite A,Petaluma,CA 94952.i(707.);762-2573 Education University of California Santa Cruz,Bachelors of Arts Degree in Anthropology,June 1993 . Experience ' Archaeological Resource'Service, Petaluma, CA; •Archaeologist- Responsibilities 'include Lab Manager, Field.Director and Osteologist, involving identification of bone elements and determination between human and animal bone, excavation, analysis, care, cueation,. reburial and documentation of historic and.pre-historic human remains. Experience includes the;excavationand/or analysis of over eighty,sets'of human remains. Other responsibilities include;,crew chief, on-going field,monitoring, testing, surveying, research, - designing databases and database management, photography, mapping, drawing of artifacts, supervision and training in field and laboratory procedures for interns and,:new employees, site specific data gathering and creating of lab and field forms. Experience interfacing with Native American Monitors and.repatrration issues. Author of many, unpublished manuscripts,pertaining to archaeological projects within the San Francisco Bay Area on file at the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma,State University" Northwest. October 1993t='pres'ent. ' NAGPRA Impl'scationsland'Application; San Francisco, CA; • University of Nevada;Reno short course in use and application's of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation.Act. Focus on creation of summaries, inventories and notifications. November 1996 Archaeological Lab Methods Field School,Flagstaff, AZ; Preservation, sorting, cataloging, analysis, ,drawing and labeling artifacts excavated from Elden Pueblo,AZ. July 1993. Fossil Record and Lab,Ilk. Santa Cruz, CA; Identification and understanding ofstratigraphy, geologic processes and fossilization processes. Fossil Identification.Winter,of.1993. Human Skeletal Biology and Lab, U.C.'Santa(Cru`z, CA; • Identificatio •of human skeletal.elements,bone physiology;basic osteology.Fall of 1992. , California Academy of .Sciences, San Francisco, CA; Assist Russ Hartman, the collections manager, in cataloging :artifacts and computer data entry: December 1992. Foundation:For°Field Research, Bajia deLos Angeles, BC,Mexico; • Assist geologist Gerardo Gonzales from the University of Ensenada, in collecting and excavating . Miocene agefossils and preparing them for a museum exhibit. August 1991. • • ELIZABETH A. BEDOIILA • Archaeological Resource Service 122 American Alley, Suite'A Petaluma, CA 94952 (707)'762-2573 FAX'(707) 762-1791 EDUCATION: • Bachelor of,Arts in_Anthropology,with emphasis in Archaeology • University of California,Da-is,'Rine 1998 Associate of Arts,in Natural Science Associate of Arts in.General Education Napa Valley College;Napa, June 1995 EXPERIENCE: . • ArchaeologicaiResource.Service,Petaluma, (8/98-present) Archaeologist • Site direcfor for large scale historic artifact recovery. Site safety coordinator. Curation and analyzing ofa'rtifacts, cataloging,`burial excavation; construction monitoring,'inCludihg in-field artifact,recoveryy and working closely with construction supervisors, laborers,'project planners, various;engineers, county inspectors ,Native American,monitors.and environmental consultants. Provide monitor training instruction to new employees and construction personnel. 'Conduct surface reconnaissance for archaeological material and prepare reports of findings, including Ali backgtoundliterature research. Ric Windmiller Consulting Archaeologist,Elk.Grove, (7/98) Archaeological Field Crew Performed archaeological site boundary determinations,test pit excavation,,relocated previously reported site features; identified and documented bedrock mortar locations. ,Conducted,:artifact recovery and worked with Native American-monitors. gY,' Museum of Anthro olo University of California,Davis, (9/97-8/98) P Collections.Management Intern and Volunteer Organized vanous collections of Dr. D.L. True: Prepared summaries,of Dr: True's regional,field. work.and collections ,for future research and data analysis. Applied museum procedures and. techniques for maintenance and,preservation-of:collection:material-and artifacts., UCDavis Archaeology Field School,Bodega Bay, (8/97-9/97) Participated in a six week field school program conducted by Dr. J. Beaton, Performed techniques,used imarchaeological survey and,excavation, utilized procedures for record keeping and artifact handling. Supervised a group of students during auger tests and was collecting?and:organizing test pit data sheets and samples/artifacts: Assisted in pollen sample extraction. SKILLS. Bilingual, fluent in English and Spanish, ,experience, in using, power' auger, and various excavation tools. GPS for site mapping and unit locations. Four years 'professional office experience; including phone reception, data entry, inventory, shipping/receiving,"and seven years customer service experience. / 7 • /25 II 11 cC ' • 790 De Long Ave. Suite 2 Jc- Novato, CA 94945 `9SSOCIAS Tel: (4.15),$98-9099 LAND SURVEYORS Fax (415) 898-2499 BRIEF DESCRIPTION R.W. Davis & Associates provide a wide range of land surveying services for a. variety of different projects. Our company is experienced in boundary, topographic, aerial and construetion staking and out staff is 40 hour HAZMAT trained with yearly updates. The firm was established in 1993. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL STAFF: R.W. Davis, Land Surveyor; 23 years experience in field and office. Member'California'Land Surveyors Association. 0 Don Herold, Professional Civil Engineer, Licensed to perform surveys in California, 20 years;experience in field and office. Technical Staff: David W. Shaw, Chief of Parties; 20 years experience. Michael D. Tarpey, L.S.I:T: Certificate State of California, 35 years field experience. David Foulk, Parry Chief, 25 years experience. Gary Lacey, Rodman; 6 years experience. GregiGardea, Instrumentand Rodman, 10 years experience. RECENT PROJECTS:. Hamilton Air'Base, Novato Sears Point Raceway, Sonoma Park Ridge, Richmond McNear Landing, Petaluma • Shelimound, Emeryville Prescott Park, Oakland • • #s • Attachment V • Summary of PCDC` "Five-Year Implementation Plan" Projects & Funding S 1 FY 2001-02 to FY 2006-07 Proposed Redevelopment Projects' • CBDProject:Area • URM Project:; $355,000 • PDA Downtown Economic Development: $420,000 • Special,Projects: $155,000 a. Downtown Security $90;060 b. Sidewalk Rehab $62,000 c. SYEP $ 3;000 Subtotal $155,000 • Parking Garage Security.&Maintenance: • $870,000 • Parking Garage Capital Improvements: $2,325,000 • • "Main Street"`Improvements: $5,000,000 a Sidewalks $2,400;000 b: Streetlights; $ :800,000 c.- ,StreetOverlays $1,000,000 d. Curb,& Gutter $ 350,000 e. Misc &;Supervision $ 450,000 Subtotal $5,000,000 • CPSP Related Improvements:- $8,600,000 • River Enhancement Plan Improvements: $5,868,000 a. Downtown Segment: $3;868,000 b. Warehouse Segment: $2,000,000 Subtotal $5,868,000 •. Putnam Plaza'Restroom;OPA $50,000 • Storefront IniprovementT Loan Program: $600,000 e. Downtown Foot Patrol Security: ' $150,000 •' Debt Service: $1;643,000 a. 2000B TAB $727,000 b. 2005A TAB $800,000 c: AD 14 Credits $116;000 Subtotal $1,643,000 • Project Administration& Overhead: $825,000 Grand Total: . S26,861,000 City of Petaluma;California 4/23/01 2 FY 2001=02' to FY 2006-07 Proposed;Redevelopment Projects PCD.Project;Area: • URM Project: $330,000 • 'Circulation &,Parking Improvements:. $11,300,000 a. McDowelUE. Washington $1,300,000. b. Street Reconstruction $8,000,000. c. Other $2,000,000 Subtotal. $11,300,000 • "Main Street" Improvements: $9,000,000 • River Enhancement Plan Improvements: $1,500,000 a. E. Washington to Lakeville $650,000 b. Lakeville to Payran $850,000 Subtotal $1,500,000 • Tree Planting''&+Establishment: $350,000 • • Gateway Capital Projects: $1,000,000 • Economic Development Promotion $2,580,000 a. Petaluma Visitor?s Bureau $1,800,000 b. Business Attraction & Retention $600,000 c. CPSP Studies &_Analysis $180,000. Subtotal $2,580,000 • LOK Marina Hotel OPA: $750,000 • Turning Basintredging: $200,000 • Debt Service: $18,285,000 a. 1992A TAB $2,612,000 b. AD 19 & Benson Note $3,,967,000 c. 2000A TAB $6,654,000 d. 2004A TAB $4,902,000• e. AD 17 Subsidies $ 150;000 Subtotal $18,285,000 • Project Administration & Overhead: $2;445,000 Grand Total: $47,740,000 • Unreserved Funds Available: $ 3,600,000 Note:Cumulative Loan to CBD Project Area(901):through FY 2006-07 is S15,000,000. City of Petaluma,California 4/23/01 3 Attachment VI Questions & Answers Concerning the Implementation of the River Plan%CPSP. • • • • 4 Questions &.Answers Concerning the Implementation of fhe River P1an7CPSP 1. QUestiohr To what degree°is the proposed Agreement for Services with CSW Stuber- Stroeh to complete the final design and engineering to construct/several phases of the Petaluma River=Access and Enhancement Plan (River Plan) consistent with the River Plan and the Central Petaluma Specific Plan (CPSP): Answer: The Agreement.for'Services is consistent with_the intent of both plans and is the.next step toward their_implementation: The,River Plan cannot be implemented without detailed construction plans:and related bid documents:.The agreement with CSW Stuber-Stroeh completes this,requirenient: 2. Question: How much has`the City of Petaluma and/or„the.Petaluma Community Development Coriimission (PCDC)Sspent of the River'Plan and the Central Petaluma Specific Plan? Answer: • • Central'Petaluma,Specific Plan: FY 1996-97='$108,045 FY 1997-98::'$296,747 FY 199849:; FY 1999-00: ;$, 39,278 FY 2000-01: $178,000,(Budgeted) Subtotal: $685,217 • • Petaluma River Access & Enhancement Plan: FYs 199,1-96: 1100,000 (California Coastal Conservancy Grant) 3. .Question: What were the nextsteps-identified on those Plans? Answer: A. River Plan: The6nextisteps'for the Petaluma River Access &Enhancement Plan are contained in the Impl'ementation:Element, Chapter 4 of the Plan. Included:in the Element is the following: "As funding becomes available, incorporate in the appropriate CIF's . river corridor improvements`advocated;by theRiverPlan„including but not limited to the following: • Trail and boardwalk design;and construction. • Right of-Way acquisition. • Landscaping, Lighting and improvements within;the Greenway. • Park.site acquisition„design;-and construction. • Habitat<enhanceinent. • Bank.`Stabilization."' B. Central Petaluma.Specifie.Pldn: The:next steps in'the'Central Petaluma Specific Plan are contained in,Chapter'10, `-`Implementation", beginning on page 106. With respect';to phasing of improvements and development, Policy 3.1 states: Target available IP public funds for capital improvements in the Turning'Basin Area. • S "Due to•thelimited.availability.of pnblie.-funds, the plan recommends a strategy of focusing available funding in the Turning Basin area in order. • to stimulate reinvestment renewal in the.heart:of Petaluma and adjoining areas. More specifically, improvementsthatmay require partial public assistance are as,follows: • • East Washington Street &Traffic Circle; • Crescent Promenade; • Golden Eagle.&Haystack Landing Parking; • Mill Square &River Promenade Improvements; • • Amphitheater Park;..and • B Street.Parking.Structure." • In addition, the CPSP recommends ethata.number of regulatory steps be taken, including: • Amend.the General Plan, • Adopt the Specific Plan, • Change Zoning, • Amend Redevelopmen •Area,. • Develop Street.Alignments, and • Pursue Additional Rail Crossings at the Caulfield.Extension. The Agreement for Services with'CSW Stuber Stroeh provides the documentation and • plans necessary for the construction of aforementioned plans. As such it is the next step to'implementation: 4. Question What did those plans-identify as-implementation costs for projects similar'to or consistent'with what is now proposed7 Answer: While the Central Petaluma Specific;Plan contains no°;cost estimates,:a'study has been,authorized to estimate theecost of public infrastructure required`.,toimplem_ent'the plan.;The River Plan contains a Cost Analysis in Chapter 10, page 243: The cost estimate wasi$1.6,159,000 for all six,segments/of the plan and-includes costs for trails & amenities,-park:improvements, habitatienhancement, and:bank stabilization. 'It should be noted that only•the first phase ofdevelopment is being:proposed'with a preliminary:cost estimate of$8:71 Million. When.taking into consideration that portions of the River'Plan, will not,be constructed as part of the initial construction phase, the figuresaare generally consistent. Part-of the work to beundertaken<by CSW Stuber-Stroeh is to prepare . comprehensive/andmore current,cost;estimate for construction. . • 5. Question: What is the potential construction cost'estimate for what:is proposed? Answer: The proposed agreement for services with CSW Stuber-Stroeh:for the-final design and construction documentation of three phases of the River Plan is.for$591,180, as follows:- 6 • • P wg h(Old RedoodHig wa to'Lyn ch!Creek) Estimated Cost • Design Phase $0 • Construction Documentation Phase $0, Subtotal for Segment: SO -- PaY ran Residential Segment(Area 3): - (Lynch Creek to Lakeville RR'Bridge) • • Design Phase $, 41,400 • Consttuction Documentation Phase $ 87;500 Subtotal for Segment: $128;900 $ 650,000 Lakeville Industrial.Segment;(Area 2): (Lakeville RR Bridge3o E.Washington Street) • Design Phase $ 39,580 • Constructieri-Documentation Phase $ 70;700 Subtotal.for'Segment: $110,280 . $ 468,000 Downtown Segment (Area 1): (E.Washington'Streefto"D Street)' • Design Phase $137,000 • Construction Documentation Phase. $177,700 Subtotal:;for Segment $314,700 $3,600,000 Warehouse Segment: • (West Bank of"D" Street:to—II"Street) • Design Phase $0 • Construction Documentation Phase $0' Subtotal`for Segment: $0 • $4,000,000 Downstream Segment; (East Bank of D' Street to Highway 101) • Design Phase • $0 • Construction`Documentation Phase $0 Subtotal for Segment: $0 -- "D" Street to McNear`Peninsula (Area 4): • :Design.Pha-se Only $ 16;500 — ProjectManagement Services: $,20;800 • Subtotal CSW/SS Agreement for Services: $591,180 • • • 7 • Additional Outside Services: $ 90,000 • -Appraisals: . $25,000 • • SWPPP '$ 5,000 • Intergovtl. Coord: $"2,500 • Utility Design: $15,000 • Envi'ronment.Review: $30,000 • Contingency: $12;500 Contingency:for Citizen Participation: (Design Phase Only) $255,200 x1.25%=$63;800 $ 63,800 Easement.Purchases: $ 39,775 (Pathfr'oin E. Washington to Lynch Creek) City Administration, Planning, & Engineering: $ 90,245 Grand Total Design, Engineering°& Admin: $875;000 Grand Total Construction Estimate: $8,718,000 The total estimated,cost of final engineering,design, contract management, City planning and•engmeering;review and administration, contingency, and'easements 'for three phases of th'e.R.iver Plan is $875,000 of which $591,180 is being awarded to CSW/SS with:the addition of a $90,000 allowance for outside engineering, environmental review and appraisal services. The allowance for outside services will,be,used on an'as needed basis with prior approval necessary from the City staff A balance of_$63,800 will be separately reserved for contingencies. Also, $39,775 is provided for the purchase of easements for the pedestrian/bike;path from East Washington St. to Lynch-Creek. Preliminary'Proj ect,Budget Fund901 " Fund 902; FY 01-02. FY 02=03 FY 03-04 FY 01-02 _ FY-•02-03 CSW Engineering: $341,200 $ 0 $ 0 $249;980 $ 0. Outside Services: $ 45;000" $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,000 $ 0 Contingency: $ 43;555 $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,245 $ 0 City Admin; $ 70,245 $ 0 $ • 0 $. 20,000 $ 0 Easements: $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 39,775' $ 0 Construction: $ 0 53,300,000 $ 300,000 $ 0 $1,118;000 $500;000 $3,300;000 $ 300;000 $375,000 $1,118;000 0' 8 • 6. Question: What issthe schedule ofthe phases? Answer. CSW Stuber-Stroeh has provided,the current,estimate for the start of construction according to segments asfollows: - • Payran.ResidentialiSegment: '(Lynch Creek to Lakeville RR Bridge) 6/1/02 • Lakeville Industrial Segment:, (Lakeville RR Bridge to E..Washington Street) 5/1/02 • Downtown Segment: ?'(E.Washington Street-to"D"Street) 5/1/02 • In the PCDC's "Five-YearImplementation Plan,"the design and construction of the Warehouse Segment of theRiver Plan(West Bank of``D" Street to "H" Street) is anticipated to begin in FY 2004-05'. This leaves thefollowing"two segments with no current design and construction phasingrstrategy or timeline: , • Upstream Segment: Old•Redwood Highway to Lynch Creek • Downstream Segment: East Bank of"D" Street to Highway 101. 7. Question: What are the sources•of funds and phases:of funding for all phases of implementation? Answer: The funding for all phase's of project design and construction is from redevelopment increment funds 901 and 902 with the exception of approximately $200,000 for the proposed Washington Creek pedestrian bridge and improvements to ed p estrian/bike paths alongdhe Payran/Lakeville Segments/of the-Petaluma River. • :8. Question: What other pieces of the Central Petaluma;Specific Plan are not included in this proposal and.what.would they,cost? Answer: As mentioned previously;the CPSP recommends the construction and/or implementation of the following that are not addressed by this proposal but are generally included in the PCDC's "Five-Year Implementation Plan: • East Washington Street & Traffic:Circle o Golden Eagle &Haystack Landing Parking; • Arnphitheater:Park; and' • B,Stree •.-Parking Structure. Cost estimates for these"projects are not currently available. In.addition,.CSW P, J Y Stuber-Stroeh will:be undertaking a cost estimate of public infrastructure required to implement the•CPSP. These.projects and related costs are not addressed by this proposal.which:focuses on improvements along the river. In addition, the CPSP recommends that a number of regulatory steps be taken, including: • o Amend the General Plan, • • • Adopt the Specific Plan, • Change Zoning,. o Amend Redevelopment Area, • Develop Street'.Alignments, arid • • Pursue•Additional Rail Ctossingsat the Caulfield Extension. These recommendations'are not addressed byor.included in;,the proposal. 9 • 9. Question: Will Environmental Study required for some or all of this? If so, which • segments will bestudied at what cost? Answer; When the Petaluma River Access & Enhancement. Plan was developed, a negative declaration was provided as part of the environmental, review. Further environmental --review will be required when the scope and scale of recommended improvements.,are clarified. For example, should the engineering analysis performed by CSW Stuber-Stroeh determine that it would be more cost-effective to remove and reconstruct the railroad trestle at Water Street, extensive environmental review may be required. However, if it is determined that the existing structure.canremain with.some repair to the surface of the pathway,limited environmental review would be.required. The completion of design and final engineering by CSW .Stuber,-Stroeh' will tallow the Community Development Department to assess the extent of environmental analysis required"based on a complete description of the proposed construction:. Subsequently a budget and timeline for environmental analysis,will be established. The proposed project budgetcontains $30,000 for environmental review: 10: Question: What:pieces.of the Bicycle Plan are included or consistent withthis proposal? Answer: The'Bicycle Plan establishes a Pedestrian/Bike Path along the Petaluma River from Lynch Creek for"D"Street, anddbeyond which-is,consistent with'the proposal. In Chapter 4,.Bikeway and Facility Guidelines, the Plan sets forth General Guidelines and•Policies. Policy 8 states: "Whenever ,opportunities for acquisition arise, review the ,status of • railroad rights-of-way, natural waterways, flood control rights-off way, and other public lands for potential designation" as new bicycle/pedestrian routes and where appropriate pursue such designations." Chapter 6 .Physical'Improvements Recommendations, contains,several goals, objectives and policies, including: Goal It Establish a bikeways network that connects north and south, ;east and west and that interconnects residential neighborhoods major activity centersand major employment centers. . Goal 2: Fully utilize creek corridors'for bicycle/pedestrian needs. Goal 3: Expand,the access to open land for bicycles and pedestrian travel': Goal 4: Acknowledge the importance of keeping the downtown a central focus and design bicycle and pedestrian facilities,to,radiate out from there. ' Objective F: Fully 'implement, the, bicycle/pedestrian; components of the Petaluma River Access and Enhancement Plan. Policy 17: The city shall develop the full access trail system and other bicycle/pedestrian improvements detailed in the Petaluma River Access and Enhancement Plan.. 10 . Chapter 7:Implementation-, Program,9, states:. "Utilize Redevelopment Funds for bicycle/pedestrian airiainties where appropriate." • • 11 S •