HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 05/07/2001 (26) . MAY 0 7 2001 14
• CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
MEMORANDUM.
Public Facilities&'.Services D,epartmenit, 22 Bassett.St.,Petaluma CA 94952
(707)778-4303 Fax(707).778=4437 E-niaili pubfacilities @c'i.petaluma.ca.us
DATE: 4-26-01
TO: Fred Stouder, City Manager
•
FROM: Mike Evert, Engineering Manager
SUBJECT: McDowell/E.'W ashington St. Intersection,Transportation Improvement Project
9863 —Funding Options and Traffic Mitigation Fee Project List
On April 16, 2001, the City Council asked if I.had alternative funding,options for the proposed
bicycle/pedestrian improvements along E. Washington.Street•(Project Alternatives.B-1 and C).
The May 7; 2001 City Council memo, which is recommending that a construction contract be
• awarded, shows $1,030,000,in undetermined funds for Alteratives B-1 and C. This figure
includes $4,301,000 in traffic mitigation fees that is budgeted and available for this project.
Funding options being pursued: •
• Coastal Conservancy grant.
• An application for $400,000 in State Bicycle Transportation Account funds will be
submitted by this June. City staff is checking on the'tinieline•for when agencies will be
determined to receive these funds. It is felt that the other approved grants for Alternative
B-1 and.0 improvements.(Safe Route to Schools, the TEA-21 and TDA funds), may act
as the required 11% City match..
Other options:
Appropriate an radditional $400,000 to• $500,000 in. `PCDC funds for the intersection
transportation improvements Alternative 1.
Traffic Mitigation Fee:!
Attached is the listing-iof projects,qualifying,•for Traffic Mitigation funds(Exhibit A). The listing
shows the names and,categories of projects, the year they were,added to the Traffic Mitigation
Fee list, and their current status. -Also,attached is the estimated fund balance (Exhibit B), and
Resolution 95-281 approving the Traffic.Mitigation,Fees effective_January 8, 1996.
Funding options/me-s/mcdowell
xc: _ Rich Skladzien,Director of PF&S
- -
William Thomas,,Finance.Director T'
• Cit •of Petaluma, California .
TMIF Status 4-26-01
Transportations elat dProtects `
. FpndedtBy : r
- - .• > k"
TrafficsMitigation Fees1and Oth erFund ,:
` FY 8 88 #o FY99 Q0
Status Legend
, ' v ,
(1)C=Completed
' • Year (2)A=Active/In Design
Pro •Traffic Mitigation P.roject;;Description •Status 'Added or Constuction
e To List (3)D=Deleted
Various CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS(See Detail Below) A 91
9945 HIGHWAY 116 IMPROVEMENTS - C 91
9734 MAGNOLIA AVENUE WIDENING 'D 91
9863 NO MCDOWELLMIASHINGTON',INTERSECTION C' 91
OLD REDWOODHWY,OVERCROSS_ING 91
.9528 OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE 91
BODEGA AVENUE -:PHASE 1 (Shifted,to Project#9864) A, 91 .
CORONA OVERCROSSING '(Shifted to Project#9528) 91
E. D ST--LAKEVILLE TOPBS (Shifted=to Ef D Stimpr/Lakeville-RRXX). 91
. 3769/9832 SONOMA MTN PARKWAY&'ELY EXTN. C; 91
9743 NO MCDOWELL STREET WIDENING "C= 91
Various ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS(See Detail Below). A. 95
9864 BODEGA AVENUE-NO WEBSTER TO CITY LIMITS /V 95
CORONA RD-INDUSTRIAL AVE&4PBN INTERSECTION IMPR.. 95
E. D ST IMPR/IAKEVILLEIRAILROAD CROSSING A. 95
E WASHINGTON/PAYRAN INTERSECTION IMPV A 95
9862 LAKEVILLE ST WIDENING "-WASH TO,D - C 95
MEDIAN INSTALLATION-MAJOR ARTERIALS D 95
9848 OLD REDWOOD HWY/WILLOWBROOK BRIDGE C 95
9821 PBN/OLD REDWOOD HWY RAMP IMP• -C 95 '
SONOMA MTN.PARKWAY TO NOMCDOWELL C 95
FUND ADMINISTRATION .99
STONY POINT ROAD--CITY'LIMITS.TO'PBN 99
GENERAL.PLAN UPDATE-TRANSPORTATION 99
ITLotaIGifflulation Related ?rotctsr ° `" y .It,:'-''/;k
PDETAlL TO ALTERNgTIVE TRANSPORTATIONIFIROJEC,TS ""Y „ yl
9814/9826 BICYCLE.LANES .95
9876 PETALUMA RIVER AND TRAILS ENHANCEMENT -C 99
9876/9898 LYNCH CREEK BIKE TRAIL C 96
9892 LYNCH CREEK TRAIL/BRIDGE C _ 95
PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENT&MOBILITY • 95
9913 PETALUMA RIVER VISTA C - 95
9893 WILLOW BROOK TRAIL • D. 95
WASHINGTON CREEK°TRAIL A 95 '
9932 PARK-N-RIDE AT.LIBRARY/FAIRGROUNDS C 95
TRANSIT CENTER RAILROAD DEPOT A 95
NEIGHORHOOD TRAFFICGCONTROL 99
As TOTAL ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS
•
-
E x,P la IT A
. Page1 oft
•
•
DETAIL-"-TO;GITOVIDE FRAFFIgtS„Y,STEKINIEROVEMENTS' g a^"r' k , s,. ; ii Status Legend
(1)C..!Completed
Other,Signal Projects - ;91 (2)A=Active/In Design
9739'FrotectedLTD&PBS A 91. •or Constuction
97.43 Sig.Upgrade-:D/Sunnyslope;. C ; 9b (3)D=_Deleted
9751Sig'._D/Sixth: C 91
9752 Sig;McDowelvComm Ctr C :91
9804 Sig+Mag/PBN: C 91
9817Sig1Lky1/101/116 C 91
9819;Bus!PulloutsiVadous`Locations C 95:
98i8.BusPullouts;WashingtomSt C 95
9915'Casa Grande/McDowell,Blvd'So'Signal : . C 95
Ely BlvdSb/Cauffield Round-A Bout - _ 95. '•
• 9912;D Street Interconnect A 95
9827 E.Wasfiington/Ely/SMP'Signal - C 95;.
9879)E..WasfiingtoniPayran'Signet - A 95
9968.Ely Blvd So/Frates,Signal D 95
. 9896.Fourth/D,'StreetSignal A 95 .
9911`.Lakeville:SignalInterconnect D 95' ' -
98x4'McDowell/Corona Street Lighting, C ,95
9808.,McDowelltivdr@ Baywood Signal D 95'
98247 McDowell'Blvd Interconnect C .95
9899 McDowell Blvd So/Caulfield Signal:Upgrade. A 95 .
9877 Rayran/Caulfield'Signal C 95:
9820 Petaluma,Blvd@ B:Street Signal C '95
9878 PetalumaBlvd No/Shasta Signal C 95'
9822 Petaluma Blvd Signal Interconnect C '95: ts-
9975 Petaluma Blvd So/MC Near Signal . C 95;
9745:PetalumaBlvdSo/MtnA'iewSignal C 95.
9806.Petaluma:Blvd/r Street Signal C 95' •
9836.Petaluma':BIvdlWestern Signal C 95
Rainier'Ave')MariaDknveSignal D 95
9925 Signal;Re'-Timing Citywide, A 95'.
■
9842 Circulation:Contiol Signing A 95'
9910;Traffic.Signal'Interconnection 95' .
90o Traffic Signal Upgrades! • A 95
9823 WashingtoniStreetinterconnect C 95
9807 Washington/LibeitySignal • A 95l '
9967',Ely/GasaiGrande Round-A°Bout C 95.
Petaluma BlvdIVVashingten Upgrade , C 95 _
Railroad Crossing:Upgrade' A 95
Western/Howard'Signal' 95
Other Signal Projects'; 95
Emergency'Vehide3Signal;Preemption A 99
BodegaAve/Bantom�Way Signal • A 99
TraffiC.Signal'EnergyReduction ' C 99
Pedestnart Creasing Edhancements:. • A 99
TOTAL CI,TY.WIDEtTRAFFIC SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS •
•
•
Page,2,of2
4/25/01 'TRAFFIC MITIGATION'IMPROVEMENTS Fund 213•
Ces are:in^bold, '
.Summary, of Eapeuditures,Appropriations,Transfers'Out,Revenues and Transfers In
' FY 98/99, ;FY'.99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02
Actual Actual Budget Projected Budget
EXPENDITURES/APPROPRIATIONS
General and Administrative 14;094 19,018 12,000 • 13,050 14,550
General Plan - 189;000 -
Street Projects 391;003' 734,417 6,628;800 ' 1,859,000 7,901,000
Signals/Signal Coordination ,346,164 26,545 1,408,000 ' 222,650 747,000
Alternative Transportation Projects 49;3;15 214,372 902,000 721,850 380,000
TRANSFERS OUT
Lakeville Highway Widening 326304
TOTALS 1,126;880 994;352 9;139;800 2,816,550 9,042,550
REVENUES
Traffic Mitigation Fees 1,606,884 2,193,692 . •1;277,900 1,300,000
Investment Earnings 230,029 680,067 250,000 530,000 345;000
Intergovernmental
ISTEA - - 985,000 895,000 515,000
4 Clean Air Grants 13,483
Article Three - 100;000 242,000 - . 80;000
TECA - 42,112 - - 92,000
TEA 21 - - 1,300,000 -
Coastal Conservancy'Grant - - 27,000 - -
Cal Trans Maintenance Grant - -. 18,000, - , -
Other • 37,561 69;250 8,450 -
Special Assessment District. - - '1,300,000 988,000
Contribution for Bodega Widening - - 349;000 - -
Contribution from PCDC - 1`69,000' - -
TRANSFERS IN .
AD,21 Sonoma Mountain Project - 184,219 - -
Mc'Dowell/E. Washington - - - 1,651,000
Bodega Avenue Widening. - - - - 989,000
• Street Resurfacing - - - 243;000
TOTALS - , 1,887.957 3.269;340 5,997;900 2,733,450 4,903,000
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 5,175,872 5,936,949 7,108;'400 ' 8.211,937 8,128,837
ENDING FUND BALANCE 5;936;949 8,211,937 3;886;500 8,128;837 .3,989;287
Ge IIP
-and Administrative covers Credit Card.fees and,Auditfees.
Investment Earnings,is based on money being spent'for Washington- Mc Dowell.
• . _. . . , _ ,
.ellr:*;:;:g.=t-IMI'Zii"A‘:"4:7i.icrS:1;01.1*..,C„-:',::4.;;K,-.',:sji;:ii..77,2:-:':: ;1:4: 1.~:t.'"•:.12"5--!::`;-7Ait:::1:-.4;:xlii,Deit-.:,;',":;4:::„..;',!.,!--; ;'.:-0-0-2.,'',':- ;.L', .t z,--,:-\,
.--f- ,-S-- 2,-_- ;.-; -_,- -- .- ' • . i .":3 . ,
.-,
: ,eN
RESOLUTION NO. cl281 N C S
i- . . . .
of the City of Petaluma 9. California
• •'•,,
;.9-
le.
. .
■,,,t1,,
r .
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES
. ..
EFFECTIVE JANUARY'S, 1996
.. ,
REPEALRESOIAMON_91-45 NCS
_ •
■'''',;',4
WHEREAS, on January 22, 1991, the City Council adopted,Ordinance 1837 NCS which :...iii '
added Chapter 11.80 Traffic ImPact Fee on Development to the Petaluma Municipal Code and,
It
WHEREAS,.'Municipal Cade Section 1 1.80.050(1) provides that the Net Peak Hour Trip
- ,_- - Rate for each Land Use Category shall be,establishechby resolution of the City Council; and,
?A-
WHEREAS, 'Municipal Code Section I 1.80:056,providea that the rate of the Traffic
. r-4....;.
-- '
impact Feeishall becalculated in accordance with:the procedures set forth in Section 11.80050
... . , . _ .
r.k.
. . and shall be established by a resolution adopted by the City Council and effective 60 days after e4:-
. . . -
adoption; and
VVIIEFtEAS, 'On Octistier 16 and on November 6, 1995, the City Council held a duly
,■ ' noticed public meeting and hearing, respectively, to consider testimony and correspondence from
-- z
members of the public and staff
'T,:f.ii•
NOW, THEREFORE BEIT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Petaluma
;.-.4.:
• .., resolves as follows: ' ,- „•
- ,
1 . The findings, determinations and analyses (Exhibits A - E) are approved and adopted.
, .., •, . ,
2 'hie."Net P.M.- Peak Hour Trip Rates" and "Traffic Impact Fee" rates for Land Use
• ,,,.;,..„.
- ' Categories, as in Exhibit F, are established.
. , - - • . .
3. This resolution shall be effective in 60 days (January 8, '1996).
4. Resolution-9145 NCS is repealed.
• , - 4
.. ...
REFERENCE I itanby oak*the kaceolninesiestioarameglatradacai aced edcctied by di Approved sa 6
r , _
_..p!"2124,
admen at the CtS of Petaluma at a tRetrele7) (,istaassisi'meettia i....7,
ca ttio Mb day ad ?gni/anther 1111-9:S.•b7 th7 ---/C --t7 le iti.:•?
• ria*-64"ci . • follenring tots: _ 0:;;!,
at/Aticati7
trzn,..
AritS: Maguire, Read, Barlas, Vice Mayor Shea; Mayor Hilligoes
'crir
- . . ,,c-,...•
14.0Es, None
" t
..,e" ,..01 _
-- ' - ::,:eA
Amyl': Hamilton, ,.,,, ..,,
_
tea. .1.. . ' .c...41, 7/ ic .S
.
Iwo,-
.._ . _ . Cesete 7--%.47-r—
'La
ea ni-__
et
EXN 1E IT C
•
•
_ . •
'St? : •
- ' •
e pee,eg I' ' EXHIBIT A
• -
- •
• w - --Teti y,cotnci'o' f he City of Petalumafinds and,dete_mutes'asfollows:
• .
• • •
1..:The Peak H i
Our Trip Rates listed n this Resolution represent treasonable estimate of the
141.' actual trip generation rates fo r the various land use categolietidentified.
•
The-Transportation Improvements necessary to implement,theTransportation'Element of the
City General Plah,ind,to-feduCe the adverse implets caused by traffic volume
211:;-.,, generated by fiiture growth are those improvementsidentifled'inthe,City General Plan, the
4 Economic and,P1 :fig,,SysteMs,Study, and other documents referenced therein. The need for
--.4S these-Transportation Improvements is directly related to the lypes of development anticipated in
la, the areas Covered by the various-Land Use Categories.
• , -
16 3" TheietilcOsts necessary.to,Construct or provide the Transportation Improvements for all
IS. .;.17 dovelcipment(notincluding,frontage improvements expected,to be required pursuant.to the City's
• : 18-. • 1Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances) are estimated to equal the sum of 575,837,418. Of -
•6- thesis:431sta, $26;796,034 will benefit existing development(Exhibit B).
•
C*1H20
-20.• .
reS51 21 4. At the present time, there is identified $28,948,704 in other funds that will be available to pay
"--• for the transportation improvement costs benefiting new development. The net transportation
;23 Emprovethentcoits'lilbefuntled from_ fees Is estimated atS20,092,881 (Exhibit C).
r, • •
AslfrirTiKet,lv e:estimatedlitiik hour tzip rates from 1990 to 2005 are 63,790 of which 31,735 (49.7%) are
attributable icitelidentialgrowth and 32,056 (50:3%)are attributable to non-residential growth
!"- • 27 (Exhibit D).• ••
'
c. •6. The'Perrcentagerif growtHiby_residential or non-residential tripsls applied to the-transportation
30 inprovenienl-toitaittnbidedIto-;new,development. The,other-Eind,credits are subtracted to
• -31 generat&a net iranspoñationcostof$14,230,663 for residential growth and $5,862;617 no n-
2 ". idential'growth E). • (
• 34 7The-number of additional •
residential units isestimatecliolie 4,757 and the increase of non-
• .5R Et uar--i-foOtageliSestimated;tO be 4,408;924. .
growth i
vex' - • 37 • .The net transportation cost is divided by the units of growth•to result n a traffic impact fee for
M peak hour trip of$2,922 for residentialtdevelopment:per unit anc1.31,330 for non-
39• residential development per 1,000 square feet(Exhibit E).
•• 40 •
' 41. 9. -The(revenues from the traffic impact fees will be used to pay for the transportation
42 irhprovements.necessitated'by new development.
Vie, :2,
•
etc7.k.i? Q5-4P3
44,4
- - - •
• ,-
eleivi,..44-eonereNn-Welef,VetiN: $:?e,t,e4V.:-.fee?•2■41f.t.."-ik:teeteiVe:rTftee.Vt6:elq4CYfek*W•1,c :17.)Tl'ieg'7..J'n'ele'ee-4-c.gleitVai-VeA:ftiZifr`.;;-51':-
Oeirm-1:1;14etikA"ereita...,4c1n4„exfie,:st eeft..r.eti-t.eerse.e.=.4...e•ee-eeee -
`°te,;','Ate+.te,-deee. 44-1.4.-e----we-,• , -
•
tin _ �}y}}}}�• •
ak
M EXHIBIT B
"r . *AI is " , . - ilI I
, r, - - ter . h..
arm
asp^
, ` ••` & 464 r-
X-
r
_ _ r i
o
.yt
_. i
H c , i V QTiap i
wya x W •
+� F }:.s E+
y Y
°,S 41 .. Z.
ReS . CI - acs
•
. * „, ,1 <, .11 i cl • g
p , .13) < li; 8 '
g ir, i ..4' . h§ 2
+'""s r'c�5yb fit±; ers°•+#,�i aaux F r + r • 5+ t a'r fr`x .;+ y��, r .Yk,�k Y . ° .+ r - Y'. ,�, '
,=7.A/sly-spy'',�e.> +"s` ;P 's d '.�` "§^rz a y tt , z t1 J a V r L p - +�x 4: t S �5 yi r R'`iz`zv°, .,�
.- T #S�,"F5 b✓ 7. r ct .rrr +v £} $ nr 8'?fii Rc a+ c r
�-;,q sPr' ;.y vF��F r �r� ` ,+ f ';�h a;ir�uyl ` t, +Iq+r;fn 'y ��' � � � i�1 � +�r r. .,7
5.a f2a �u?.�S3i •. '''''' .3 � L. ..+ak^L.� ...1s , . �1^', I•.4rt_ N.s"ai.� M ...� R.. �.<T± u',`-`.1°Y .1Y �^s'r.o".f•
EXHIBIT C
ik14 -
,...:,-
. i s s
A 2
• •
g gri-g,g 6 6 11 A 4. 6 1 $ 6 4 6 i
e4 .4 el .6 e4 CII 4 0,C) •—• r- 4
!-- " ..,
§ ri 5i5 gn5 g
5, Yg ”, nai - ,4 .4 =-1 —
-,
' *E• .t - .
1 0 5 5 5 1
p - 5 9 g 6 t 6, !•
.-• .
t _ iS 9/ 0 ;
lie !
i a
: --- lg
s
■ m
i 1 2 I 1
, 4 11 f 7- 4 F.. Li
i I N A "' :4' - 7.. ... :". ;.; ...
X
147 • 0 0 E
L
t•
-i. il nit ge. rt •
I
L.. .
•
eta 1 E g
w
staggniiig0 .pAVL1- :4
r --- - i
i
4
i
0
...
b 4 tl c w z E
5 piRg E vs c
0 e){P4 4 4 z 0
'.! ,„t;
; g ilzi
g >eci -g 51 k § g
g
0016 {62217+ < /- § rOt
g ,,s ? 0 A
.
“1 ,4E1
L.
i
Reso. 9 5-a,53 I NC s
r
el V ,O'ra,..'1,.,*, ,t,t' ,M
". 1 • e
1.4.1, ' t .3, ii.rab-n„. •
',-``,1-1---- - ' , , ' ,,,,, , i• , ,, .,' -, g 4
izst.C :0itc .?„..,ai c
‘4.4,14V .engticpailtiatkIt .‘2-: 4-4111,12C IL t.,4 :4,k;?;::54.7--14.74rifli.,4;111t;:lqtal.1;:ratatI4P7:471/411‘.k41.1::'‘.;Z' 7 te tit -TitSfttAx,:s.'L,
vk-3.,,Active-4-Q.:Ifiepr,t4:: '.,,,- - ,,, -,,•„_tiz,
if* 9,44,„.4*-,1/2,ity„fct,-,-."--„---„,La,
iit 1,1" '''''l•arCitigt•itt b- ?,re I'4oe■ts.t:',= ,/4-<,- •.• A•^•.0
-•
EXHIBIT D
-.--(:,
CITY OF PETALUMA
-,-t -
..Y.,,..;,-
TRAFFIC S - CATION FEE ANALYSIS
TRIP GENERATION BY TYPE 1990 TO 2005
UPDATED FOR JANUARY 1995
TRIP GENERATION RATES FROM
TRIP TYPE CITY TRAFFIC MODEL
P 1'.t PEAK HOUR TRIPS . •
•
TOTAL TRIP RESIDENT WORK/OTHER -'', •'
. 1 0 •
INCREASES RELATED RELATED
,
I 990 2005 TRIPS . TRIPS '4....•
. .
INI3OUNI)TO PETALUMA
.,....,,?.1-:.
FROM HOME TO WORK(1118W 34.029 41,713 7,684 7,684
„ ---- - FROM HOME TO OTHER OBEN 20,217 25481 5,264 5,264
• FROM WORK ID WORK HPIM3' 19,365• 23,007 3,642 3442
73,611 90,201 16,590 - 16,590
„ - OITMOUND FROM PETALUMA
-
_ , - - • -__- _ .
44-444'.11.-,4
FROI1.4 HOME ITO WORK(011139 56.930 76,244 19,314 19314 it,,-1::, .
241 .241
- - FROM HOME TO OTHER(01031 32,794 13,035
- FROM WORK To WORK prim 15,121 20,142 5,021 5,021
104,845 129,421 24376 19,555 :5,021
• INTERNAL TO PE1ALUMA
• .( ,..
, .. FROM HOME.TO WORK(PHIPA 26,349. 32232 5,893 5,983 .
,
..FROM 110ME TO an IF.R(MIN, 56,024 68,_617 12;593 6,297 6;297 li:k.:,,,,
FROM WORK TO WORK(PNITh 22,092 26,240 4,148 A148 ;r3,.;FT,1'
• 104,465 127,089 22,624 12,180 10,445
TOTAL ALL TRIPS '7% -r- 282,921 i' 346,711 . • 63,790 _31,735 32,056
. ,
,.;:.
, .
..,,,::!,.
PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS BY SOURCE • - i 100.0% ., .. -49a% " , ,50.3%. 0 tab.c
t.f-•-•,.
'• .:frtiSr
.4,17,2
. rrr
a'-r•e.,
•
it,,,
4(1/2.,..i.,
• tftaS, .
••t.'-"'t,::,
147.44:'
:Or
ll
.
Re.so• cl r'3.- 8 t NC.5
. .
rrip."aiZ','-•*;;"41.‘ir4s4.4.*SfeAtarM454.424,,c;4,4 t 4e,1■4;4=1, i Kr : ,'4',41;:44(::,•4 X: ',%,,454,•ECt .,r".-LIN 2,2:144';1/454":" :;7..4"f‘,4';:::141.?"*,44,1:-"r4.(it•-•;:24:44,1-te43'l',"/,;;:4::, i
visAv2.7g4 1 ,--.,_,-,•;:trAC.,,.,;;;?;•,' 1-1/4,4,,,;4,4.4.- 4,,,„,,,I.,•,.-••4?1 ;,, 74,,i4, _ ,r4 i4., = ,!'nr L•VT 4"-'Tj ....-,1`;‘r• .1,1 4,41'• 'Z'S•,"Ii.4`450,40;4,1P4.••.4,11.1k.'Ii•gp-,•Th--.,f .
ver,,,,‘ ii... cialms,;;AvA.,,,tr .--„, ' ', ".-,‘A'..-te4t,-;I, i,-; ' -,,,-.TE -,t> tw,F,TT.. 0.., ,,,2*-‘6,,,,,,T4,,,,,, ,,,r,r,...„-..0,1',..r,
l't tr "44,470r42fatirr': at?-14; veiNity4 q'S:i;e4.„.-i--,7%,itrnt.'lc*-:',4- , -','.', , ,.....e,f•-e2k.11 .t,,14. 44.t.g.P.,
,vv ;,;:;0,,,:::2„..N,..,,,z,};-::: A-,. n-......;t=j14t '0' •rt ‘'4' ' .1 thj.' ''.4 rrri'r.rr'"ag''rr-rr
‘"•rerr. : !"MAW* ....,# '.t'',"'I.C44...."4.4.7,44., ; 77 .. - , ,
M
r
pavl
CITY:.OF PET
ALUMA
SUMMARY OF'TRP.r'IC'MITIGATION?FEE CAC3ILATION
tie
PROJEC'C Con
'' •TOTAL F�'i'AiATED COSIS OF I'ItolECl'3:-
375,01,411
' TO Ixg'La fr G laERAi:PLAN POLICIES
fiyt, ,
•
py,yC _ PORTION 7O AE FUFD)FD}ROM EXISTING 325,796,034'
AM V 70 B6 FUNDED FROM TRAFFIC 319.01.314:
MITIGATION FEES 7DNEW DEVELOPMENT
. s ..
PEECALCUI.A130NBYSOURCE -
xr - xrsmENI'AL COKO€Rcw, routs
OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL
,
5 s _. •
s '� PRO1E(.'IEp TRAFFIC OHNEAATION IAH'ACT 49.7% 30.3% 108.8%
rr .1"; AYSOURCS .•
�' ALLOCATION UP PRNF.CT COSIS TO RE ,324.397,381 224,544.034 549.041.314
.'FtR4 FROM NEW%fl1 OPMENT -
` LESS CR®IFS FOR PREVIOUSLY CdJ,ECfF7) (210.155.53'n (SI3,712,055) (323.3.4 ,704) '
•
tTES AND OILIER SOURCES Of tVM)INO '.
ki NErA - -:--TO BL YUNDPD BY NEW 514,358X7 f3,3cI,817 530.8►t,6Yl
DLVRLOPMEIYT THROUGH TRAFFIC.MIT revs
ii s
DNDJE NET AlAOUNf AAOVF AY,PROh:Cf4D 4,737 1.402,924
- -15E Rai 1995 TD GENERAL P1.1}7 (Rmde ul US.) (Sq Fae1 oCamuoi.l,
( BUEDOl1r - ORw.d'.ndv8i.1)
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FOR EACH P M r
i±
. PEAK HOUR'-TRIP ALti CATEGORIES _ s „ -* �, .
■
a4 ;
'
iii
Reso. 95-alI )1/4)C'5
k'r''ved�'�f £}.k— f .t,r ('s � i l.,ry,'...t'',..'': -,:....-1.-. 'L r �4?G 5 y, C t,
y ', y) rx .gyp s i z s r is ( i -A r U'rt+i 4'%5�' t�4 ,
"'V' iit:"it �t''TG f-. t, riM r.z3 y1 11 "} � y r li '� tir? r 4M iTrV a i�N a xZ,\t b y i
i
pc-�wa��l � � � 5., ,aa�_ , f 'T. i ^s4 ..al...T i %51` ...Mn] .- r �'.... v.ri' ' :r ran'. �'i_AIM ., _:�'IU4
•
• i, '
EXEM3IT F
..,
• - ,. .
:-.... . , _ •,: ::'-.1.:-.1, :7-•‘..4.-H-1,:r.,--:',--- :-.-•': --.•..--. • .
0....k-.4.,•-!.4-7.•;--,-.3(..-.;:.•-;;If.T?:,..?[--.7.4..1?,:. ,-,,...-,--::::L.-,-_•.•::: .•,i.-- .. •
. .
1 fl-'771.;;;;-:T..:-=±',:?-7-,: -,r.,.:---;''•--z:-•I•: --. - •
OF PETALUMA _
. .
clTY ; at'FEE ANALYSIS
gr--:---Tt.--;:c :—.1-.--ii . ::.:. .. - __ . __-- , -- r. r MITIGATION . -
74,,---;;;::;-...-..::::::icr- t - TI/AFFI-
EEE, .. .
I
IDErja .330
i vritr-...,l'•:-.5'. HT:: '-'' .7.- ..,.- • " • .
MEASURING
• .
-
FACTOR -
Ei.---..---z- ;z-',-:-''." •-.- - . .... - - -• RATE . '
2- -• -'i. ---t— 4- USE .
•
. 4 . • TRAFr ArT ItEsaChilmil:}11:1:HG:A.uTRI:ENL r.1,992'
. .
, •
. .
•
r R4O LThirr
.S1585
• ,
PER DWFT
RKSfl
1.005 • 1NG UNIT
- SINGLE FAMILY OR DUPLEX s I 4672.
, .
PER ucvr-u- ....._
0.63
DWELLING UNIT
S1.197 '
•-•MAI4UPACWRED HOME R559
• 6WELLING-
UNIT S 12E5!
. •
4 .
. : OA
DWELLING
-
,0.63
...
I . '..;-.-z-',11,--.-... :,-; ---,7-' 14-'4- .-.- •- 'yam:LUNG
„. Per sq a
Ian rest
Fee si I-M°°I
, 4-44--32--L--1 r-.:-.1"• '-...- ..:-'..;, -'.' . f'''''-' • -
. .
.
.
$858 ,
S] 2:48
15( 2 :.--
z
.,
,Ct-:;;; NON-RIS ga..filAla
$2A85
PER ROOM
4,... _ - . - - • • • ,•_COMMERCIAL. 4
0.645
•
.
PER!M°
1869
,s 2.62
•
s2619
,, „ •
1 000 SF
. '
•: .._
.4.
191 PER '
•
S ,0.04
OFFIC!-,1
S39
/4000 SF $996
'
. 0349
• - ALL INDUSTRIAL USERS(1) 1000 SF
't
,...
--- MINI STORAGE pER ,
0.029
,
•
•4'
±44‘
' :.::::•'-'4--2.:.; 1 .-:. (1)lit ma „ : f
.,..44.
•:-=
,
. .•.:-.,
, .
--.
. ..
. -
- •
i c
:',CCS''.''.:'-1:.E „-C.1t:-:'ti-1- • C.. '.• '
. .;,
'',.-■.
•
•
-Li': '''''4'. :•'-',,, .' -
• -.'
. ,
. .
.-
Res°. q S.at I M
• -,‘;‘,,.
. .
,'.1)-111:
-
•
•
•
. . .
i . - ',... „...1;rii.,,,v.12 .-:::y.,--,•: =.LcIt,:f...),,,t4A;irsv7.-.-;$7.?,,,,:k4.:t1W,V,v-f,..,:f?,1,-.i14.4:.,,,z;.-f,i-tet..7.,
. •=:•• ':- - "..' -- .- " ... . : : --. " . ,:--,?t :N4:t2ET,4.,1.-:1;44.-2-7.,--74:14-..x?:.:,::!..:+,ty,,,,;;;;:ft.,,,,,,,,,,,,LAytk.Q4,,,,,v.,,,,,,;,?/;:ek.1.:-.:;;,,,•,,,,, ..11...
-, ;:-••,,- :•-, . - ,...),,w.g,, 4q.;,;,cui54:‘,-,;-:45 ,1:;4e..,iiPtc-;;*.::::54::,:-;;L: ri,Ek.1--'6.V.i4itqr2Vkt-i:MICtlefferrgsS5-1t"'
1!;T:l'■7 C::,1.,.. : ' .:'I r;:t -.C.". :■.:-''.:.''.:r.■' t.,1.[':if'7.TE:Ier;r:''; 1..;tr:.‘..V.i.W,VC1::::.:A;•Wkik-5::7,1:i.,z:ftr-).' V4eS.:Actr:rn
,,,,...74„,„.,,FE,.,,, -xt,q, :Ve,'r4
: ,,, 1:r." ' gil
5 .,-4 -,11,;;i44.,■,;,,,te,..,.::'el.,.--::::":''%:;;,-'..•:.{::.." .fitt, ; te,,1444-t...,Hn,"•," "
,'".ItiJe5';' ■;:k:14:4@illiiiitt*"'"N a '
•:,5±,,-,1:1:::'';'.- -V,I;cii5S.....T11;414.43...i'l.".ki':,'!,-.:r-::::i,‘., ,-:::;t4,-,.."::,:.."444,%,:.,„.4114,y,-..■,.?v.±5-,...v...-5.-..
• ,47-. t .N..;41
..;-.1143.:41!:51:3*-pV, .I'atgAr4-,".4. ',;V:',/1/2.ir.ci-,:;;;;,,,,tzi,.. -
-5.*X.:■:44..AP.:;72:gitfrAWC*17.e.„...;.,„?... ,
..,V4:4*.„4:4,%-.Lrec•C'''''' .