HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1849 N.C.S. 05/06/1991~~~~ >~~~
~~.
JUN ~ 199
ORDINANCE NO. 1849 N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilman
Michael Davis
Seconded by Councilman
Nancy Read
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S., AS
AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND REZONING PORTIONS OF CADER
FARMS HIGHLANDS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 136-120-05, 22 AND 23
FROM PCD TO PUD
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed with the City Council
on April 15, 1991, its report as set forth in its minutes of March 12, 1991 (File No. 3.423),
recommending the adoption of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as
amended, by reclassifying and rezoning certain lands being more particularly described as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 136-120-05, 22 and 23 from PCD (Planned Community District)
to PUD (Planned Unit District).
Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning Commission held a public
hearing on said proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended,
on March 12, 1991 after giving notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period and in
the form required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended.
Section 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended,
the City Council finds as follows:
Findin s
at the development plan, as conditioned, results in a more desirable use of the
land, and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single
zoning district or combination of zoning districts.
2. That the plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a unified and
organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in
relation to adjacent and nearby properties and associated proposed projects and
that adequate landscaping and/or screening is included if necessary to insure
compatibility.
3. That the natural and scenic qualities of the site will be protected through the
implementation of tree preservation conditions of approval, and that adequate
available public and private spaces are designated on the Unit Development Plan.
ORD. 1$49 N.C.S.
.~
.•
4. That the development of the subject property, in the manner proposed by the
applicant and conditioned by the City, will not be detrimental to the public welfare,
will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent
and spirit of the zoning regulations of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma
General Plan.
5. That the PUD District is pro osed on property which has a suitable relationshi to
one or more thoroughfares (Sonoma Mountain Parkway and Rainier Avenue to
carry any additional traffic generated by the development.
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended,
and based upon the evidence it has received and in accordance with the findings made, the
City Council hereby adopts amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. so as to
reclassify and rezone said property hereinbefore referred to in accordance with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Section 5. The City Council further finds that the requirements of California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15083 have been satisfied through the
preparation and certification of the Corona/Ely Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report in which the anticipated specific impacts have been adequately identified and
mitigated through the adoption of specific conditions of approval applicable to the
proposed Cader Farms Highlands project.
Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post this Ordinance for the period and in
the manner required by the City Charter.
IF ANY SECTION, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this ordinance is for
any reason held to be unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of
the City of Petaluma hereby declares that it would have passed anal adopted this ordinance
and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more of said
provisions be declared unconstitutional.
INTRODUCED and ordered Posted/D~~'~his 15th day of April, 1991.
ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1991, by the following vote:
AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
Hilligoss