HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Resolution 2020-15 10/27/2020DocuSign Envelope ID: 82EFDFOC-El56-42CE-BA60-35FF97EC34D1
RESOLUTION 2020-15
CITY OF PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT CITY COUNCIL ADOPTS A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE CASA GRANDE PROJECT
LOCATED AT 240 AND 250 CASA GRANDE ROAD
APN: 017-040-020 AND -059
FILE NO. PLMA-19-0006
WHEREAS, Doyle Heaton of Falcon Point Associates, LLC submitted an application for the Casa
Grande Project, including a Zoning Map Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, Vesting Tentative
Subdivision Map, and Site Plan and Architectural Review for a 36-unit residential project within the
Residential 4 (R4) and Flood Plain Combining (FP-C) zones, located on a 45-acre site at 240 and 250 Casa
Grande Road(APN 017-040-020 and 017-040-059) (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Project is subject to the Petaluma General Plan 2025, adopted by the
City on May 19, 2008; and
WHEREAS, in evaluating certain potential environmental effects of the Project in the Initial Study,
including but not limited to effects of the project on climate change, water supply, and traffic, the City
relied on the Program EIR for the City of Petaluma General Plan 2025, certified on April 7, 2008 (General
Plan EIR) by the adoption of Resolution No. 2008-058 N.C.S., which is incorporated herein by reference;
and
WHEREAS, the General Plan EIR identified potentially significant environmental
impacts and related mitigation measures and the City also adopted a Statement of Overriding
Considerations for significant impacts that could not be avoided; and
WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study for the proposed Project consistent with CEQA
Guidelines § 15162 and 15163 and determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration
(MND) was required in order to analyze the potential for new or additional significant
environmental impacts of the Project beyond those identified in the General Plan EIR; and
WHEREAS, on October 8, 2020, the City's Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration based on the Initial Study, providing for a 30-day public comment period commencing
October 8, 2020 and ending November 7, 2020, and a Notice of Public Hearing to be held on October
27, 2020, before the City of Petaluma Planning Commission were published in the Petaluma Argus-Courier
and mailed to all residents and property owners within 1,000 feet of the Project as well as all persons
having requested special notice of said proceedings; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on October 27, 2020, at
which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Project, the MND, the supporting Initial Study,
the staff report, and received and considered all written and oral public comments on environmental
effects of the Project which were submitted up to and at the time of the public hearings; and
WHEREAS, the Initial Study applies the BAAQMD's California Environmental Quality
Act - Air Quality Guidelines including the BAAQMD thresholds of significance, and as lead agency under
CEQA, the City of Petaluma has the discretion to rely upon the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines and thresholds
of significance, since they include the best available scientific data and most conservative thresholds
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-15 Page 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 82EFDFOC-E156-42CE-BA60-35FF97EC34D1
available for comparison of the Project's emissions, and comparison of the Project's emissions against
these thresholds provides a conservative assessment as the basis for a determination of significance; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to further analysis in the Initial Study, including evaluation using
the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines and thresholds of significance, the Project does not make a
considerable contribution to cumulative impacts from air quality or greenhouse gas emissions identified
as significant and unavoidable in the General Plan 2025 EIR, because the Project's emissions are below
the significance thresholds identified; and
WHEREAS, the MND reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis of the
potential for environmental impacts from the Project; and
WHEREAS, the MND, Initial Study and related project and environmental documents,
including the General Plan 2025 EIR and all documents incorporated herein by reference, are
available for review in the City Planning Division at Petaluma City Hall, during normal business hours and
the City of Petaluma website and the custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute
the record of proceedings for the proposed project is the City of Petaluma Planning Division, 1 1 English St.
Petaluma, CA 94952; and
WHEREAS, while the Initial Study for the Project identified potentially significant
impacts, all potentially significant impacts are mitigated to a less than significant level and therefore the
Project as mitigated would not result in any significant impacts to the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Project, the MND, the supporting Initial Study,
Response to Comments, the staff report, and received and considered all written and oral public
comments on environmental effects of the Project which were submitted up to and at the time of the
public hearings;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
1 . The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference as findings of the
Planning Commission.
2. Based on its review of the entire record herein, the Planning Commission makes the following
additional findings:
a. The Project is consistent with the General Plan 2025 Medium Density Residential land use
designation in that the residential project provides a dwelling unit density between 8.1 and 18.0
units per net acre.
b. The Project is, for the reasons discussed in the October 27, 2020 Planning Commission staff report
consistent with the General Plan pursuant to implementation of staff -recommended changes,
and more specifically, with the following General Plan goals and policies: Policy 1-P-2 (Efficient
Land Use), Policy 2-P-37 (Flood Storage Capacity Preservation), Goal 2-G-16 (South East Subarea
Goals), Policy 4-P-1 (Tributary Setback), Policy 4-P-2 (Wildlife Conservation), Policy 4-P-6 (Air Quality
Improvement), Policy 4-P-7 (Motor Vehicle Pollution Reduction), Policy 4-P-7.A (Automobile
Transportation Alternatives), Policy 5-P-15 (Bikeway System Implementation), 5-P-20 (Bikeway
Connection), Policy 5-P-22 (Pedestrian Connectivity), Policy 5-P-22.A (Pedestrian Experience),
Policy 5-P-22.13 (Street Crossings), Policy 5-P-23 (Pedestrian Site Access), Policy 5-P-26 (Creek and
River Trail Connections), Policy 5-P-31 (Bicycling and Walking Desirability), Policy 6-P-2.A (Tributary
Access and Recreation), and Housing Element Policy 1.1 (Encourage Residential Development),
Policy 1.2 (Optimize Development Potential), Policy 2.2 (Flexibility), Policy 4.2 (Affordable Housing
Production), and Program 4.3 (Onsite Inclusionary).
c. As outlined in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 27, 2020, the proposed zoning
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-15 Page 2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 82EFDFOC-E156-42CE-BA60-35FF97EC34D1
regulations of the Casa Grande Planned Unit District can be supported. The Project is consistent
with all other zoning and development provisions of the Implementing Zoning Ordinance not
contained in the Casa Grande Planned Unit District document.
d. Pursuant to the analysis in the Initial Study, the Project does not make a cumulatively
considerable contribution to the significant and unavoidable cumulative traffic or noise impacts
identified in the General Plan 2025 EIR.
e. With regard to traffic, although the Project would contribute vehicle trips to an intersection
identified in the General Plan EIR as operating at an unacceptable LOS at build -out, the
affected intersection has already been determined to acceptably operate at an LOS E or LOS F
due to overriding considerations and conflicts with other General Plan policies.
f. With regard to noise, the Project will result in a less than cumulatively considerable impact to
noise because the project excludes new stationary noise sources and its incremental
contribution through vehicular trips is insufficient to result in a perceptible change in noise.
3. Based on its review of the entire record herein, including the MND, the Initial Study, all supporting,
referenced and incorporated documents and all comments received, the Planning Commission finds
that there is no substantial evidence that the Project as mitigated will have a significant effect on the
environment, that the MND reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis, and that the MND,
Initial Study and supporting documents provide an adequate description of the impacts of the Project
and comply with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Petaluma Environmental
Guidelines.
4. The MND, Initial Study and related project and environmental documents, including the General Plan
2025 EIR and all documents incorporated herein by reference, are available for review in the City
Planning Division at Petaluma City Hall, during normal business hours and on the City's website. The
custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings for the
proposed project is the City of Petaluma Planning Division, 11 English St. Petaluma, CA 94952.
5. Based on its review of the entire record herein, including the October 27, 2020 Planning Commission
staff report, all supporting, referenced, and incorporated documents, and all comments received,
the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative
Declaration (Exhibit 1) and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (Exhibit 2) prepared
for the Project.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-15 Page 3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 82EFDFOC-E156-42CE-BA60-35FF97EC34D1
ADOPTED this 27t" day of October, 2020, by the following vote:
Commission Member
Aye
No
Absent
Abstain
Councilmember McDonnell
X
Chair Streeter
X
Vice Chair Bauer
X
Alonso
X
Hooper
X
Marzo
X
Potter
X
ATTEST:
DocuSigned by:
NYU sfm�
Pat k Str #PrT ROE2014AC...
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DocuSigned by: DocuSigned by:
t�u4kr �ivxs
H 62RFS�B, R'KREAR-hcretary Eric 6�85ALPg4F3048D...
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-15 Page 4