HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 05/21/2001 (8) DRAFT • • 'DRAFT DRAFT
City of Petaluma,.California
• Draft Minutes=of a Regular
3 City Council Meeting, •
4
Monday,iJune 26, 2000
6 - Council Chambers
7
8
•9 The Petaluma City Council met on`this date at 7:00.P.M. in the Council Chambers.
10
11 ROLL CALL
•
12
- 13 PRESENT: "Council Members Cader-Thompson, Keller; Healy; Vice Mayor Torliatt
14
15 ABSENT: Council Members Hamilton, Maguire; Mayor Thompson
16
17 PUBLIG'COMMENT •
18
19 Lauren Williams, 12 North Napa Drive, Director of the Petaluma Trolley'Corporation, •
20 asked to be included on the July 17`"''agenda in,anticipation of the discussion and
21 direction regarding the Central'Specific Plan. The Petaluma Trolley's Board of Directors
,22 includesthree•founders and Marshall West, CPA. Mr. Williams would like an elected
alofficial and-a Chamberof`Commerce member to be•on the board as well. Anyone
2 wanting9nformation or to,volunteer their time can c all 763 7366.
.25
26 Terence Garvey,:83"Maria Drive; would like to post reward flyers in response to the •
•
27 arson incident'atFishmamSuppiy:
28
29 Bob Martin, 171 Payran}Street, thought.that'if:adequate storm drainage fees had been
30 collected long ago,:the City wouldn'tbe'have to dip into the redevelopment money:
31
32 Vince Landof, 12 Cordelia Drive, spoke about the Payran Flood Project.
33
34 Geoff Cartwright, 56-Rocca Drive, attended the Urban Water Management Plan 2000
35 community workshop. He explained that the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) is '
36 asking customers to reduce water use by 15% and plans to increase water rates by
37 approximately 40%, while building a new pipeline to supply water to Marin County. He
38 pointed,out•,that California has dry periods and wet periods. Right now, the State is
39 going through-a period of wet winters: If.we're being asked to reduce water use and
40 being charged more for the water we do use now he wondered, what will happen when
41 we have a drought? He thought water customers would be left "uprthe creek without a
42 paddle:" "Actually," he said "we won't need a paddle because the creek will be dry and
43 we'll be left with a lot of canoes."
44
• City;of=Petaluma, California
Draft Minutes of a Regular
City Council,Meeting
Monday, June 26, 2000
Page 1
•
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
1 Hank Flum, 1721 'Stonehenge Way, spoke`regarding the proposed factory outlet
2 expansion in the floodplain.'
3
4 Vasco Brazil, 4551 Lakeville Highway, s`poke;regarding the Water Recycling Project On
5' April 3, 2000 Council approved a contract with Carollo Engineers for Phase; 1 of the
6 Water Recycling Project 901"2. Carollo was to evaluate arid conduct 'a side-by=side -
7 comparison Of a range of:recycling treatment planttypes identify a development plan
8 for the-treatment facility and meet the project report requirements of the State Water
. 9- ..Resource&Control Boards State Revolving Fund, Program. :
10
;11 There are five basic SRF fund requirements": .Number two requires a :cost-effective
11 evaluation of alternatives over a twenty-year planning period. The evaluations
13 presented must include an evaluation of the alternative of upgrading operation and
14 "maintenance of the"existing facility to improve effluent quality.
15 •
16 Number -five requires information on total capital costs, annual operation and
17" maintenance;costs, 'as well as the estimated annual or monthly cost to 'residenti'al and • -
18 industrial users for all the alternatives. ThisSRF requirement caused the old bib-filter'
19 plant to be added as a number five,alternative to be evaluated. Toi ensure that this
20 would,occur, this City Council recommended and approved.Option 3, Refined Scope of
21 Work, pluslothertasks in the service agreement with CarollaEngineers. .
22 . _
23 The first public forum for•Phase 1l was held on June 14 at the. Community Center. ,Qn _
24 display for the public to examine before and after the meeting were aerial photos of the
- 25 old plant site, 'the ponds site and the, .adjacent property owners land. None of the
26 • Alternative 5 option layouts'were on 'display:. The public did not see any.of.the plant
27 layouts until Mr: Ban described them, There was no layout for 950 CHopper Street
28 site, because, the Value Engineer Team had decided 'that the existing"Bio-filter Plant
29 should be demolished and was no longer in the SRF evalgation process,
30 Three Bio-filter Plantdeficiencieswere discussed, with three matching photos. The lack
31 of aHblueprint:of the.old plant,.making underground repairs difficult, also was cited.
32
33 This decision by the.Value Engineer Team to remove the existing Bio-filter plant from
34 the 'evaluation process at,•the beginning of`Phase 1. raises the question of a biased
35 process rand defeats`what the process is designed to do, which is find out what will give
36 the'ratepayers.the best""bang;forthei'r buck," by evaluating the cost and reliability for a
37 new plant; out of four alternatives, at another •site against the cost of updating the
38 existing' HoppertStreet plant::site for;a•20,years extended life and reliability. The only
39 way to findoutis to evaluate all of them The Value Engineer Team should be`made to
40 reverse.their decision and to get on^with what they'were told to do.
41 '
42
43
44
Cit •ofdPetaluma;California
Drift Minutes;ofalRegular'
City•Council.,Meeting,
Monday,,June26,{2000 • -
:Page2
`DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
•
•CCUNCIL,COMMENT
•
3 Council'Member Caller-Thompson:
4
5 Attended an open house for Petaluma Cable Access'(PCA).
•
6 • Attended a Take Your Dog to Work Day at Knowledge Point.
7 • Announced a new bike path`in back of the Lynch Creek,off ice buildings leading from
8 the ea st aide to the west',side under the freeway.
9 • Read that the Town of Windsor updated Park Fees. She would like the City to
10 reevaluate its fee structure.
11 • Has received compliments from constituents about the professionalism our Fire and
12 Police Departments.
13 • Would like to adjourn°the' meeting in memory of Allen Shainsky, owner of Petaluma
14 Poultry Processors, who passed away recently.
15
16 Council Member Healy:_
17
18 • Regarding the meeting about the Hopper Street Sewer,,he understood that would be. •
19 an analysis of what could be rehabilitated, which was less than 100% of what's
20 there. Some of the structures date back to the 1930's and it did not make sense to
21 upgrade them.
2.Vice Mayor Torliatt: - "
24 • Concurred that the.Citys Park Fees needed to be reevaluated.
25 • • Announced that The Leadership Institute in Ecology and Economy was inviting the
26 community to a forum on Land Use and Transportation, Saturday, July 15 at the
27 Petaluma Community Center, 320 North McDowell:from 9:00,a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
28 • Attended a conference'c,in.,Portland, Oregon that hosted by the Congress for New
29 Urbanism, about.high-density:infill projects, etc.
30
31 AGENDA"CHANGES,,ADDITIONS:AND DELETIONS'
32
33 MOTION: Council Member Healy moved, seconded by Cader-Thompson, to move
34 Unfinished Business Agenda Item 12, Resolution Awarding Contracts for
35 Landscape,Maintenance in LandscapetA'ssessment District Areas 1 and
36 2 to North Bay Landscape Management and Area 3 to Nessco: Rejection
37 of Bids for Landscape Medians, Area 4, to''follow Item 14.
38
39 MOTION
40 PASSED 4/0/3 (Council Members Hamilton and Maguire and Mayor Thompson,
41 absent)
42
43
• City of Petaluma, California
Draft Minutes of a Regular
City Council Meeting
Monday,June 26,2000'
Page 3
•
• ,
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT .
1
2 MINUTES so
3 • -
• . _.
4 Minutes of November 8, 1999 were approved with the following correction: Page 1, Line
5 32, Change "Chief Parket° "Chief Krout?
6 , . . •
7 Minutes.,ofs)une 1-, 2000 were approved,with the following correction: Page 3, Line 22,
8 change "Pritice Park"to "Lucchesi Park,"and Page 6, Line,2, change'Vbenefit,staff ..
9 report"to "benefit of staff report" -
. . .
.. _.
10, • • " -2 - .
11 MOTION: Council Member Healy moved, seconded by Cader-Thompson, to
12 approve the minutes of November 8, 1999 and June 1, 2000, as :
• 13 Corrected. . • .
, . . . .
14 . .
1-5 MOTION
16 /
PASSED: 4/0/3 (Council Members Hamilton and Maguire and Mayor Thompson
„. . . _. .
• 17 • - abSent) -- •-
18 . - . .
. .
. . „„ , . . • _. .
19 CONSENT CALENDAR - . • - '
. . • ..
20
. • , ' ..,
21 1. . Resolution 00103 N.C.S. Awarding Contract to Replace the Roofs on Fire
• -
22 Stations 1 andf3.to,HeniTs Supply, Inc:., for a Total Of $122,865,-and..Autharizing - --
23 ' a Total Budget,of $130,000. (Carr)
•
24
25 2. Resolution 00-104 N.C:S. Authorizing the Purchase of a John Deere Tractor
96 and Loader frothrValley,Tnick"& Tractor in The Amount'of $25,439.65 for'Water
27 Conservation &.Resources'eDepertment. (Hargis) . •
28 •
29 3. Resolution 00-105 N.C.S. Accepting of Project'to Eipand`the
, .
30 Petalurna.CommunityCenter and Lucchesi Senior Center Parking'Lots by
31 Ghilotti Brothers Construction, Inc. TOtel, Project Cost: $267,750.10. (Carr)
32
•33 4. ,Resolution,00-106 N.C.S. Declaring City Vehicles and Other Materials.
,
34 • .Surplus and Authorizing Disposal of the Vehicles and Other Material.
35 . (Sklaclzien/Cornyri)-
36
37 5.. Resolution 00107 N.C.S. Authorizing the rSte Source Purchase of Traffic
38 - Video Camera Detection Equipment From Kar-Gor, Inc., in the Amount of
39 . $4321•3:40. (Skladzien)
40 . •
41 7. Resolution 00-108N CS Accepting Resignation of Karen Greene from the
42 Recreation, Music & Parks-Commission. (Kline)
43
, • •
. . .
• City etRetalunia, California •
DSCMinutes of a Regular
. _
City Council Meeting
Morlday,June 26, 2000 '
Page 4
DRAFT ' .DRAFT . DRAFT
•'8`„ Resolution 00-109 N C S,,Calling and Giying Notice Of A,Regular,Municipal
' Election To>Be Held'On Tuesday, November 7,. •000 For Election of Three
3 Council Members and Two School Board Members. (Kline) .
4
5 9: Resolution 00-110 NC.S::Requesting The Board of Supervisors To Consolidate
6 A Regular Municipal Election On November 7, 2000 With The Statewide
7 General Election. (Kline)
8 . .. . . _ .. .. .. .
O_
9 MOTION: Council'Member'Cader-Thompson moved, seconded b Healy, to.
10 approve ConsentCalendar Items 1-5 and 7-9:
11 •
12 MOTION .
•• 13 PASSED: 4/0/3 (Council..Members- Hamilton and ;Maguire and Mayor Thompson .. . •
14 absent)
15
16 6. Status Report on the General'Plan 2000-2020'Work Effort. (Tuft)
17 • ..
18 Director, of General Plan Administration Pamela Tuft presented a status report on
19 the General Plan 2000-2020: ' A date for a workshop has, not been.set. The
20 scope of work is just beginning. The outline, is incomplete, the General Plan
• 21 • • - Executive Team is working on it and.the details will be presented to the Council.
• 22 • -' The?requesttonight-is to be allowed.-to break,the scope of work into two phases, ,
completing the Water Resources component.separately. The primary activity this
Fall 'would be 'the beginning, of surveys, statistic gathering, and completion of
25 maps.
26 -
27 City Manager Stouder noted that a lot, of research and preparation was
28 completed several years ago on elements of the Water Resource issue that .
29 would need to be brought current. He thought.the technical work could proceed
30 without jeopardizing' even.early public discussion.
31
32 Council Member Torliatt.thought' Council +should' hold a workshop to discuss ,
33 those items and establish a frame work to which the community could make
34 additions, deletions etc. :
35
36 Ms: 'Tuft stated that she assumed, given the Council's agenda load, that they
37 would be unable to review the scope until August.
38 - -
39 Council'Member'Kellerthought"Cultural Resources" should be part of Section 5,
40 making-that"Parks,.Recreation and Cultural Resources."
41 • ..
42 MOTION.: Council. Member Keller moved, seconded by Cader-Thompson, to
43 .separate the Water Resources component froth the General Scope
44 of Work for the General Plan 2000-2020.
• City of Petaluma, California.
Draft Minutes of a Regular
City Council Meeting
Monday, June 26, 2000 -
Page 5
•
. •
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
1 MOTION
2 PASSED:? 4/0/3 (Council ,Members Hamilton. and Maguire, and Mayor 0 .
3 Thompson,absenty
4
5 PUBLIC COMMENT
6 . •
7 ,Geoff Cartwright, 56 Rocca Olive, agreed with: the tvio-pliase approach .to a
8 • closer look coulthbe taken at the WaterResources:elerrerit. He suggested that
9 thetity,savel'money',ilythefOtOre by not allowing building in the floodplaim,
10 - ' ' - -
11 END:PUBLIC COMMENT
12 . .
13 UNFINISHEMBUSINESS
14
15 10. Discussion and Possible Action on Boards, Commissions and Committees
16 Repoii. (Kline/Stouder) . .
17 - • • . _
18 City Manager Stouder presented a gbide”'prepared by City Cleit'BeverlyyKline to
19 govern the recruitment and appointment process for the City's Commissions. He
20 ribted that this was Council's Opportunity, to review ,certain roles and
.. _ _,.. ,
21 reSpOntibilities of the various CommisSfons. • ' - . . •
. _, - .,-, •. ..
23 City Commissions. serve a valuable,function, save a, lot of time for the Council a_
24 . 'Members, and enhance the dialogue,with the public. At least'five t-O ,Sikfdlkiine. w
25 positions end ula being'spent supdorting'CommiSsiOns. The City needed to look
26 at how Commissions could support themselves, were there some fees that could
27 be established that would STOpport,the cost COrnrnissions? One example would
28 be tax on'bicycles to support the Bicycle COrrirriittee.
29
30 PUBLIC COMMENT
31
32 Vince Landof; 12 Cordelia Drive, asked what Council wanted to do with the City
33 CommisSions. Welethey,thirking about eliminating all ottriem or someofthem?
_ 34 .. 1-leyetiLiested that aii.,CornmiSsion-rmerribers receive copies of ther staff report.
..,
35
36 END PUBLIC_COMMENT
37
38 Council Member Keller thought all ComMissibri members should, be notified,and
39 receive dodurffebtatibn. "Council ,should meet,once a year with the Planning
40 Commission, Parks Commission and Airport Commission. He thought COuntil.
41 should take:a lock at'SPAROs role in reviewing'projects after otherS:Havegined. •
) 42 Off ortrtheprOjects.
43 .
-
. , .
As.
CM/ofeetakfri* Califoinia 11,
pfatMinutes of a Regular
• . City,eouncilivieeting
Mohday;Airie`26,•:2000
Page 6
. '
A ...
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT •
Council Member.Cader-Thompson agreed that ,Council should; look,at,SPARC's
role in. heir review,of projects and the duties of,the Planning,Commission. She
3 would like to update some of the titles of the Co mmissions.
4,
5 Council Member' Healy agreed with the idea of meeting with some of the
6 Commissions on a regular basis; starting with those to which Council does not
7 have a liaison, SPARC being a prime example.
8 . -
9 Vice Mayor Torliatt also agreed that the roles the Commissions play needed to
10 be better defined;
11
12 City Management will provide this information to alrCity. Commission members.
13
14 11. (Removed) Verbal Report.Regarding Status of Payran Project and Discussion
15 and Possible Direction Regarding Payran Flood Management Project Financing
16 and Budget. (Hargis/Stouder)
._- 17 - . - .- • - -
18 14. City`of Petaluma Budget
19 . •
20 A. Resolution 002111 N:C.S. Approving-the Revised Fiscal,Year 1999-2000
21 Budget and'Aclopting'the Fiscal Year 2000-2001 Budget. .
•
22 - - -(Stouder/Cornyn);.., — - . . . - .
2# MOTION: Council Member Keller moved, seconded by Cader-Thompson, to
25 adopt Resolution 00-111 N.C.S. Approving the Revised Fiscal
26 Year1999-2000 Widget and Adopting the Fiscal Year 2000-
27 2001 Budget;,
28
29 MOTION - •
30 PASSED: 4/0/3 (Council Members Hamilton'and,Maguire and Mayor
31 Thompson absent)
32
33 B. Introduction and Adoption of Urgency Ordinance 3001 N.C.S.
34 Appropriating'Funds for the.Operation of theCity of Petaluma From :
35 July-ti 2000 to June 30, 2001 and Declaring'the Urgency Thereof, to
36 TakeEffectrmmediately.
37
38 MOTION: Council Member Keller moved, seconded by Cader-Thompson, to
39 adopt.',Urgency Ordinance 3001 N:C;S; Appropriating Funds for
40 the Operation of the City of Petaluma From July 1, 2000 to •
41 • June 30, 2001 and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect
42 Immediately.
43 i
44
4
City of.Petaluma, California
Draft Minutes of a Regular i
• City,Council Meeting
Monday,June 26,2000
Page 7
. .
, .
DRAFT. DRAFT DRAFT
. , •
. . ..
1. 'MOTION
2 PASSED: 4/10/3 (Council Members Hamilton and -Maguire :and Mayor •
3 Thotilpson absent)
4
5
6 C. Resolution 00-112 N.C.S.. .AdOpting, ,Fiscal y'eat, 2000=2901 •
7 Appropriations Limit. ,(Cornyn)'.
8
q POTION: Council Member,Keller moved,,,seconded by•Caderjhonipson,,to.
10 'adopt Resolution 00-112 N.G.'S. Adorning Fiscal4ear 2000-2001
11 Appropriations Limit
12 . • .
13 MOTION
_ . _ , -
14 PASSED: .4/0/3 (Council Members Hamilton and Maguire ' and Mayor •
15 Thar-rips-on-absent)
16 .
17. .15. Discussion and Possible Action on Adoption of Interfund Loan POlicy. (Cornyn)
18 . . .
. . ..
19 Interim Finance Director Paula Cornyn presented to Council the Interfund Loan
20 Policy, explaining how it would differ.dioending on the length of time tor whicn
21. . , - ., the•MoneY•lis,boridWed.. A Short Tenn Loan would he,90,days or les§. Medium
. - .
22 Term Loans WO-Old be 90 days to one year Lang Term Loans would bedyer:tone
., ,
23 year in duration-. A Long Term'loan involve a Promissory Note that would come
24 before CoUntil. The Quarterly 'Treasurers, Report would reflect outstanding
11/
, ..
25 balances and'payments made during the quarter: She referred to .a chathof the
26 loans from the beginning of the Fiscal Year showing additions and repayments .., •
. ,
27 and the :bans that are outstanding: as of May 31. :She noted that the City has .
28 always ,disclosed and commented on Interfund Loans in the City,:s CAPER, the
29 combined annual financial report, and they have had some mention in the
30 bud•gpt,
31. -
.32 PUBLIC'COMMENT
33.
- 34, • Bryant Moynihan, 102 Dawn 'Place, suggested that the Interfund Loan Policy
35. • should include the:fdlloWingl: . •
36
37 1.. Interfund Loans are-to be avoided when possible:
.38 2. The ,Short Term loans may be initiated by the Finance: Director,from the
39 General Fund, provided the Finance; Director fully epects the funds will
• 40 be available Within the.near futUre. All such ;loans must be repaid within -
41 90' days: or converted to a General Fund expense or converted to ,an
42 Interfund Loan.
43 3. All Interfund Loans must be approvedWithin 30 days by"the.Courtil.in the
44 form Of .a written Promissory Note with a stated interest rate, terms' of
45' repaymentand terminationdate,
City otPetaluma,dalifornia III
Draft Minutes of,')a Rebillai
city Council Meeting
Monday;June.26, 2000
Page 8
. •
•
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT •
al • 4. Interest expense should be booked quarterly between the funds. All"
Interfund iLdahs, including the balance increases, the ,reductions, and
3 interest, should be reported as part of each Quarterly Treasurers Report.
4
5 END PUBLICZOMMENT"
6 Council Member Healy wanted to see the policy tightened up. He thought the
7 Low & Moderate Housing Fund should be made off',limits in the future for
8 Interfund Loans. He would like to see City Management authorized, either the
- 9 Finance Director'or City' Manager, to make short-medium term loans (6 mo/180
10 days) at their discretion if they were reasonably certain.that the money would be
1.1 repaid from an appropriate source during that time.
12
13 - MOTION`. Council Member Healy moved, seconded by Cader-Thompson, to
14 Adopt,Resblution 00-113 N.C.S., Intorfund 'Loan Policy.
15
16 MOTION
17 PASSED: 4/0/3. (Council Members Hamilton and Maguire and Mayor
18 Thompson absent)
19
20 12. Resolution 00-114 N.C.S. Awarding Contracts for Landscape. Maintenance in
-21 Landscape Assessment ,District Areas 1 and "2 to North - Bay Landscape
22 Management and Area(3 to Nessco. Rejection of Bids for Landscape Medians,
Area 4. (Carr/Anchordoguy)
)5 Parks Maintenance Supervisor Ed A nchordoguy reported that when the item was
26 brought before Council on May '1, 2000;Council expressed concerns regarding
27 the use of pesticides by contractors.,,Negotiations were made with the contractors
28 for their compliance with the City of Petaluma Integrated Pest Management
29 Program. -
30 -
31 PUBLIC COMMENT
32
33 Ronnie Cohen, 177 Grevillia Drive, had a conversation with North Bay
. 34 Landscape about the cost to maintain Landscape Assessment Districts without .
35 any chemicals and was told it would cost 60-70% more due to pulling weeds by
36 hand and pruning more frequently. She was against the use of plant growth
37 regulators used She suggested test projects where some areas don't use any
38 chemicals atall, to see if the;community can be convinced that-that is the way to
39 go.
40
41 Vice Mayor Torliatt would like to see one to two pilot projects,done and a report -
42 brought back to the Council.
43
44 MOTION: Council Member Healy moved, secondedb.y.Keller, to adopt
41iik Resolution 00-114 N.C.S. Awarding Contracts for Landscape
IIP City of.Petaluma, California
Draft Minutes of a Regular
City Council Meeting
Monday,June 26, 2000
Page 9
DRAFT DRAFT . DRAFT '
1 Maintenance ip LandscapeAssessmentip1strICtArea8 1 an&2 to a
2 ' - North Bay Landscape Management and Area 3ta Nessco and
lir
.
3' • Rejection of Bids for'LandstaperV1 edialisrArea:4. ..
4 .
5 MOTION
. . • . .. . .,
6 PASSED 4/0/3 :(Council .Members: Hamilton and Maguire and Mayor
7 Thompsorpabsent)
. . 8 • . -
9 18. . Status keport regarding the Closure of the "D" Street Bridge:.(Skladzien)
10
11 Ricic,Skladzien,, Director of Public. Facilities and Services, gave the CObricil a;
,..
12 brief overview of the closure olthe ''D7 Street Bridge as of June 1:9th;
13 - .
. - • -
14 There i have been approximately 31;000, brochures 'mailed to all residents,
15 bdsinesses and post office boxes with City of Petaluma zip codes: Articles have
16 been in ,several newspapers. - Petaluma Community Access has run live
17 programs and information has been 'placed on'-two r web ,Sites. 'Six'.electrohic,
18 message,.boards were activated in and around strategic:streets-, There is also a
19 "D" Street Bridge hotline, telephone* number posted on the construction area
20
:- .- . — ' . ..- • -
22 Since closure, the Traffic Department has been adjUSting theA timing on the traffic:
23 signals as necessary to accommodate the change in trafficlow: Traffic:Signals. 0,
24 elongtheV/asilington Streettorridor have been upgraded.
25
26 Meetings have been held with the Downtown Merchants•Associetion„Chamber of'
27 Commerce — Visitors Organization, Police:and'Public Safety officials:
78
29 The period of closure, is June 19 through ,August 2E. To date, tasks are on "
30 schedule and there will be monthly:updates'aa the project prOgreSaest
31
32 NEW. BUSINESS
33
34 17. Discussion and Direction t9 "City Management to Commence Discussion and
35 - Application Process with the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open
36 apace. District (SCAGROSD) for th& Potential Acquisition of‘a:P.Ortion of thp, •
37 McNeal*:Peninsula. (Tuft7Carr)
38
39 Director of General PlanzAdministration Pamela Tuft asked for"CalinCil:direttiOn
40 to commence discussions with the owners' representatives and the Open Space
41 . District: Council agreed,
42 •
43 CouncilLMerhber Healy wasvery:anximis"to see the parcel acquired. ,He did not
44 think that S1,5 million was even a basis for starting discussions„
45 - . -
City:OPetaluma,:California 411
Draft r■ilinUtescof a Regular:
DitylgoUhciNeetieg
Monday,;:lynei6,,2000.
Pag:e'10
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
• Council Member Keller thought:the acquisition was:long past due..
"3 Vice Mayor Tor liatt would like City Management to contact Supervisor Kerns as
• 4 soon as possible so he is in on the negotiations and acquisition process,
5
6 CLOSED"SESSION
7
8 Mayor Thompson announced.that.Council would adjourn.to Closed Session for the
9 knowing iteims: •
. 10 •
11 Conference With Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation (Subdivision (a) of Government
12 Code §54956.9),.Allen vs. City of Petaluma. Sonoma County Court Case No. 222730.
13
14 Conference With Legal Counsel, Anticipated Litigation. Significant Exposure to
15 Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision.(b) of Government Code`§54956:9 (2 matters)
16
• 17 Conference With Legal.Counsel, Existing Litigation Subdivision (a) of Government •
18 Code §54956.9, Lionsgate vs: City of Petaluma, Sonoma' County Superior Court Case
19 No. 220489.
20 •
21 Conference'With Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Subdivision (a),of Government •
22 Code§54956.9, Nicoli Vs: Liohsgate; Sonoma County Superior No. 219989.
21/Conference With Real Property Negotiator, Pursuant to Government Code §54956:8.
25 Property:-945 Petaluma Boulevard North, APN 006-450.018. Negotiating Party:
26 Stouder. Under'Negotiation: Price, Terms or Payment; or Both.
27
28 Conference With Labor Negotiator, Pursuant to Government Code §54957.6, Unit 6
29 Police, Unit 7 Fire, Unit 8 Department:,Directors, Unit 10,Public Safety Mid- •
30 Management. Agency Negotiator; Acorne.
31 •
32 Council,Adjourned to Closed Session at 10:36 P.M.
33
. . - 34 • • - - ..
35
36 Pamela Torliatt, Vice Mayor
37
38
39 ATTEST:
40 •.
41 • -
42
43 Paulette Lyon, Deputy City Clerk
City of Petaluma, California •
Draft Minutes of a Regular _
. City Council Meeting
Monday, June 26, 2000
Page 11
•
•
1.
Y•
•
•
•
•