HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06/04/2001 (16) 4
CITY OF 'PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
• MEMORANDUM
City Manager?'s Office, 11 English Street,.Petaluina, CA 94952
(707) 778-4345 Fax(707) 778-4419 E-mail:cieinigi@ci.petaluma.ca.us
DATE: June 1, 2001 •
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Frederick C. Stouder, City Manager
SUBJECT: Letters of Interest
- i •
5/22/01 Menlo From Fred Stouder RE: Energy Crisis in City Facilities;
• Attachment.Memo From Rick Skladzien RE: Energy Conservation
Efforts
5/24/01 E-Mail From Tim Anderson, SCWA RE'North Bay council Draft
Position Paper
Spring 2001 The,Ally, Article, "Hitting'Potholes in-the Dark"
For 6/04/01 Water Advisory Committee - Agend'a
For 6/05/01 Board Of Supervisors Agenda/Consent Calendar
• For 6/06/01 LAFCO—Agenda
6/06/01 Memo From Steven Sharp, LAFCO— FY 2001-02 Final LAFCO
Budget
6/06/01 Memo From Steven Sharp, LAFCO —LAFCO Staffing and Facilities;
MOU and Reappointment of Executive Officer
S:\secretlry\tr of interest 6/01/01
•
•
p..,`
•
City of Petaluma, California MAY 2 g 2001
MEMORANDUM - q� G'y,'
cri 1 M?3'L4R'S ,
Fire Department, 198 D Street, Petaluma, CA 94952
778-4390, Fax 762-4547
DATE: - May 22, 2001 CU ,V)A j
TO: Frederick C. Stouder, City 1 nudger y�fi f t -
FROM: Terry K. Krout, Fire Chief.`/c/ 7 U
'SUBJECT: Energy Crisis in City Facilities
I am sending you this memo as axstatus update on what issues, changes and operational
considerations there have been since January of 2001.
Rick Skalzien and his crews have achieved most of the changes that have occurred. (I have
0 attached a memo dated May 17,.2001). They have taken a very active role in changing light
bulbs and changing fixtures to more energy efficient types.
Operationally, Katie Crump has been instrumental in distributing key information, i.e. warnings
regarding keeping computers backed up and encouraging work place conservation.
One major change, that has closed a perilous void, was the battery back up system in IS. Tim
. Williamsen was able to safeguard approximately 25 PCs and develop battery backup for the
mainframes. The addition of the computer room onto emergency power, not only provides for
orderly shut down through battery power, but also allows for all hazard operations and falls into
line with our EOC operations_Basically we are able to maintain:a clean, filtered source of power
that could be used during catastrophic events.
What needs'to be considered in the.future? There is an opportunity to equip some of our city
building with solar panels for energy use An excellent example may be the Airport Office area
This area is not designed-for living, rather low impact office functions with minimal staff on the
average week.
Ihave evaluated a passive solar system at Councilmember Maguire's home. As an example of
costs,and rebates, the system was installed by a contractor for approximately 314,000 and
qualified for$3,000 in rebate. The system (8 solar panels and inverter) can supply 3.1 KW per
• day (observed) and may be practical for low use buildings, such as the Marina, Airport or ball
field type structures. 'Further research by a contractor with solar experience would be necessary
to evaluate economic viability in dollars returned.
S:\Pat&Sheila\Energy audits.doc
CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA •
MEMORANDUM
Public Facilities&Services Department 22 Bassett St,Petaluma CA.94952.
(707) 778:4303 Fax(707) 778-4437 E-mail pubfacilities@ci petaluma.ca.us
DATE: May 17, 2001
TO: Rick Skladzien,.Director, PF&S
FROM: Kevin Homick, Public Works Manager
SUBJECT: Energy Conservation Efforts
• All streetlights, which are staying all the time, are top priority for repair.
• Motion detectors have been installed to insure that lights turnoff when not needed.,
• We have installed red L.E.D. lights at all signalized intersections, and I am working on
purchasing green L.E.D.'s for the entire city'. Installing these lights reduces the power required
by about 40%. I need funds to purchase amber L.E D.'s and to change out all 3M,signalheads in
Petaluma. When this is achieved, we will have saved 60%+ of power needed to run all signals in
town.
_. •
• I would also like to install L.E.D. pedestrian signalsiatall signalized intersections: If all L.ED:'s
were,installed, this would reduce power by approximately 80%.
• All air conditioning units are turned up in order to conserve as much power as possible.
• We are installing smaller air filters in all A/C heating units'to allow themto operate with less
power.
• All new bathroom fixtures are low flow, waterless urinals and motion detecting sinks. By
installing 10 waterless urinals, the City will save 150-200,000 gallons of-water a year.
• When fluorescent light ballasts go bad;we are.changing to electronic ballasts to save energy.
• We have installed "energy conservation"signs at all entrance doors to'Ciry Hall to alert visitors
that we are running with less lighting than usual.
• I have:asked all employees to turn off all unnecessary lights.
• At workstations, all employees have'been requested to shut off all computer monitors when not in
use
• As a result of the recent Monterey conference on street light and energy conservation, we are
making plans to install solar powered, compact fluorescent(42w bulbs/200w=rating)
street/security lighting-units in all City parking lots, buildings and residential streets.
• We plan to install xerlscapes, rather than traditional landscaping at the new Mosquito Abatement
Building, as well as at the Airport. This will save not only water gallonage, but also energy
requited to pump the water.
KH:slp
•
Page 1 of 1
•Katie Crump
• From: Tim Anderson.itima @scwa.ca.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 4:41. PM
To: Pam Nicolai ;fstouder@ ci.petaluma.ca.us;-cdegabriele @nmwd.com; dshaddox @ci.cotati.ca.us;
jnetter @rpcity.org
Cc: Renee Webber; Pam Jeane
Subject: North Bay'Council Draft Position Paper
Attached for your information is a copy'of a draft position paper on water availability that is under consideration
by the North Bay Council. Since this,may item come to your attention in the future I thought you would want-to
be aware of it.
With Best Regards,
Tim Anderson )^ /
/
Sonoma County Water Agency C o h
V C
707-521-6208 ( C_
•
•
•
Fy
n' 1140rC'
•
5/25/01
•
• Position Paper
North Bay Council
Water availability; MarinandSouthem Sonoma Counties
Situation:
The North Marin Water District;(NMWD), the Marin,Municipal Water District
(MMWD), and Rohnert Park, Cotati.and Petaluma all receive water from the Petaluma
Aqueduct, a part of the Sonoma County Water Agency(Agency) water transmission
system.The delivery entitlement in millions of gallons per day (mgd).for Petaluma is
21.8 mgd and the delivery entitlement for NMWD is 19.9 mgd. The Agency also has an
agreement to supply water to MMWD at a rate of 7.4 mod. The Agency is not obligated.
to make deliveries to MMWD if there are shortages of water in the Russian.River or if
insufficient transmission capacity is available during the period of May 1 to September
30.
The Agency has not been able to meet peak demands on the Petaluma Aqueduct.since
1996. The Petaluma Aqueduct, south of Ely Booster Station neapOld Redwood Highway
and north of Petaluma, is operating at or above its design capacity during peak summer
months. The Petaluma Aqueduct is also vulnerable to mechanical, structural, and
• electrical outages that would reduce the Agency's ability to deliver water to customers.
To provide an adequate water supply to communities dependentupon this system, the
Agency must construct two new aqueducts, one from Cotati Tanks to the Ely Booster
Station, and one froin'the Ely Booster Station to Kastania Tanks south of Petaluma. The
project has been delayed by.several factors, including litigation and delays in securing
agreement among all contractual parties involved. Realistically, the parallel aqueducts
cannot be completed until 2007 at the earliest.
Existing Problems:
• The Petaluma Aqueduct is 40.years old and vulnerable to structural failure. In
addition, pressure surges occurring during power failures could cause the pipe to fail.
No parallel pipelines are available in case of a transmission main failure.
• If an aqueduct break occurs south of where the Cotati Interne and Petaluma Aqueduct
intersect, deliveries could be limited to available storage in Kastania Tank(12 million
gallons maximum).
• There is no standby power generation available at the Ely Booster Station leaving the
pumps vulnerable to electrical outages and rolling power blackouts which,will
• significantly impair the the Agency's ability to provide water.
• Water use by the cities ofR"ohnert,Park and Cotati can impact delivery capacity"on
the lower portion of the Petaluma Aqueduct. •
• Local standby water supplies operated by cities along the Petaluma Aqueduct are
inadequate to make up for water shortages caused by unpredictable events.
Recommendations:
•
Principal business`users'of water from the Petaluma Aqueduct should be made aware of
the existing system's-limited ability to meet demands during peak water use periods and
its vulnerability`to breakdown.
Because substantial improvements to the system should not be expected for at least six
years, principal users should be encouraged,to adopt significant water conservation and
water reuse practices that reduce,peak demand on the water transmission system.
Business users of water from the Petaluma Aqueduct should be made aware that
unpredictable events could lead to implementation of mandatory water conservation
efforts for water users along the Petaluma,Aqueduct.
The North Bay Council could work with policy making bodies in its service areas to
educate policy makers as to the,gravity or the water availability situation as a means of •
• facilitating efforts to meet the water supply needs of water users along the Petaluma
Aqueduct.
•
•
, � A Y eel !7 L
!Ili, a ,e 4 Kit, Y{{.�1iAA ® d .® V t ii;
a� , 5". » � " as,ti • ;- ,t z'l `is
..11V , > .Y' "fix ;1'44.0' x ,. e t* k w
Y
° ° �r i Zit ' i 1�' " `fit ra
r- n Y
? 11 n` a of
Art. 4 ' % • �'% , lit M r , ,c�'i'i Ea'4F, a Y
p..tions of new x , ® h 1 , ; ®,"e :i:®rf f p
eople,same old r_s _ u , �; Y I
�� S- 7 E�•a"Y`PTOadsr :r S64., Jr . 1 c: Vttav '}.'u %x` ' 'S;°sT's"ate •kti' t5krs.1+r< ' 's-*<a".fF'ax _ 7F`e'd`
4 v 3
SanaJose s,roads
M t f . a`
"a aril higFiways"rank'a rte; at"z y S o- r,,, `f.
a (#fifth worst in-the"(= ^W g, i� = sr i, y�v ti f®Lk i� tr,�
tiation with 30 ° ' *�. 7yk, •/&,;h y, ',41 tPli.
+ ,
4 percent rated,'13401 '
s :Sari Francisco „4
r Pz = rte, 1' r _ J4 ,
,
Oaklandsranki, tt Shoved to the back burner by the power shortage,
c:Yr srxtriwor'st with .. 7
b f2lki ercentll;a er +
i' oo y California's road crisis worsens .
far f,poorF;condrtion�
��o.^�"°i.�,� Y(n call 3r _..
s • The,*Bay Area's , t it rth California's politicians plugged for"somebody's ox is going to get gored."
y,. ccurrrrenitlongLrange ��; into o the power shortage,the focus in And nowhere are more oxen rumbling around sii d ,.1.117ortat ton l( F' ; Sacramento has detoured far away the arena than in the Bay Area,where officials
�yplan leaves local , l from traffic Blackouts trump backups any day are revising the Regional Transportation Plan,
' L,wst�eets and roads ,' Yet California's roads crisis cannot be a 25-year funding blueprint outlining some
III l ,twltt%a$5 6fdon • ignored..Its getting-worse and it's getting away $130 billion in spending.Most of that money is
maintenance, ; '141: ; g g" g g } }
, shortfall during"" .'` ; threatening to.last long after the power grid already committed to specific street, road,transit
,�''� if"°= �' .+` starts humming again. and other programs,leaving $7 billion to $13
,the next two g-�
z�e'4 o . a * fir,
a decades P �s ���� California,home of the sixth largest economy billion in dog-eat-dog,up-for-grabs funding.
• ,s-yy't s l,,6, t'' • M the world,possessor of what once was the best
fir rving,on,,roads,-" ; highway system in the nation,now has the third Fight for funding
r ieed,of repair ,
t . r 4, worst roads m the nation,according to a recent The contenders for the pot include bus advocates
costs California"
F cr v ,t: ,' Transportation California survey That's right-the rail groups,bicycle coalitions,open space lobbyists,
motonsts,$354 state that prides itself on cutting-edge everything urban redevelopment proponents,smart growth
each m extra"vehicle
vrr, ,( ranks just ahead of Louisiana and Missouri in the factions,transportation` usuce"adherents,ferry
its operating costs 1 • P J n}
faaaa ;rt4y,t percentage of major roads in need of repair. supporters,road and highway advocates and several
-rTfi'ejaverageil3ay k i. According to TRIP,nearly half the state's roads combinations of the above.
¢ter A ealdnypt spends `: have now been pounded into poor or mediocre And it's not all about improving mobility
iabout 60 hotgs axj" condition,victims of accelerating use,decelerated Some advocacy demands being made on the
S year in congestion maintenance and stunted growth.In the last 25 RIP have less to do with building transportation
Bay Area congestion years,California's highway use has jumped 116 improvements and more to do with broader
consistently ranks r ercent while highway lane miles have increased agendas involving anything from building
b J -O involving
"estit,among,the nation sc
ro
worst.,and as - a scant eight percent.Officials estimate that in the affordable housing to waging war against the
7 : s § : next 20 years congestion in urban areas will grow by automobile and the consuucrion industry
forecast to ,
h , increase 240 F' , , triple digits as more and more people crowd onto One group calling itself the Bay Area Land Use
I1 1 &dent>between :: aging roadways. and Transportation Coalition is promoting an RTP
rt,, "'#1990 and'1020 " ,So to the taxpayer and traveler,blackouts may wish list that includes a"Transportation Justice"bus
: " 'r ' Win; come and go,but bottlenecks are forever Millions service package at the cost of 5125 million a year
In;all Californ a and millions of new people,same old roads and not and a"Smart Growth"Community Investment
highway lanexmd_„ ., enough money to fix them-despite the longest Fund,a.k.a.subsidized housing,at$50 million year.
1 Dave merease ° t economic expansion in state history According to The cornerstone of the BATLUC plan is a
only 8 percent in ar P
Y .4-,- 4':o 25 years.4 sr state officials,California faces more than$83 billion regional express bus system at a cost of 53.5 billion
'fz Since 1964,(; -ain unfunded road and bridge improvements in the over 25 years.One problem:The HOV lane system
E°`" next 10 years alone: the buses would run on has miles of gaps,some of
v< meanwhile the Fg.,t; Y g p ,
-fad umber of miles ,4;' Since local funds by far(69 percent) are the which spare no room for additional lane capacity
k�4- '4en in Cahforma,1'? largest piece of the funding pie and since state The'BATLUC solution:"Optimize-A-Lane"-
nc ymore>than`Ay `��' dollars are being sucked away by the power crisis, convert.free-flow lanes:in those areas to carpool
IPledk .� ' . most of that massive burden falls on the shoulders lanes:Never mind that according to the state
• , 2�f � r, * $ i 6 ' of cites and counties.There,in the parlance Legislative Analyst Office,Bay Area car pool lanes
, i�. rt i-, " of local transportation planners,transportation operate at only 56 percent of capacity or that after
145f:+F,t ,.lt,"li r p , S• funding is"constrained,"transportation code conversion,remaining lanes are further clogged.
,1. vpri ',Tx . "„
r +r 4«Spring 2007:1 ,The NIy,
Motorists toced,to sit in the congestion.spawned one side of the fray in the;Bay Area.The other X!3The Sac}amentof" i
by the conversion might call it the Paralyze-A- struggle is to keep money already earmarked for l$ +region speendey.'W44
Lane Plan. road and highway projects'on the books.Two yonlyi57 FITt cent of
And oddly enough,even though the coalition's lawsuits filed in February;by environmental groups %t&! rs rrequiy d?tit
ress buses would rely onfreeways,the group would kill road construction.The•first attempts to ?'to adequa tine, ;
• malntam iIs streets
y opposes any highway expansions. overturn the Bay Area's latest clean air plan,even wer +r>� i
and roads tThe t .
oday advocates of every,stripe'are;beating though the region's air is much•better than it was te 3 T r a`dl
urea hasmore
paths to the Bay Area's nine county congestion, 20 years ago and continues to improve.If anew iya4k,tham$900tintflion
management agencies,which are scheduled plan is not approved by the,Environmental • In deferred road y
to submit candidate projects in May to the Protection Agency by next August, new road n mintenance' k'sS ,4,
Metropolitan Transportation Commission for projects could be barred and the region could ,�' `e$'r,° n Irt li�"+,�''
inclusion to the RTP.The plan's final approval lose federal h highway money. The,Sacramento 't
P PP g Y Y ; 1 are x a +. 7,e
is scheduled for late October. The second suit would force the MTC into `,region IS expected¢ 1
At the same time,selected committees and diverting even more money into transit operations. ��<to+grow banoyher?;
panels are creating"smart•growth,"environmental This is despite the fact that Bay Area transit 5msll on people„oiver st i
the ne li'?9.year`s t
justice and performance filters that the RIP ridership has remained at 6 percent of all trips �+ ” aQ S
sToday�trafflcaonF
must pass through before its final adoption in late while subsidies have increased dramatically.ThestretchesofiU S
October.Since the criteria for these filters are often current RTP devotes two-thirds of its projected is sc :501slows ao'25
subjective and vague,the kind of RTP that will $89 billion to public transit.(California leads all t mdesatamhour 0,
emerge from these planning laboratories is states in transit funding,with$932 milliondunng`rush hours " "t
anyone's guess. in fiscal 2000.Washington was ry�k� �e a:` ri
x� Over the next 20 c
3y �
' ' second with a distant 1 years r 'd
Alliance mobilizes . ` " $103 million.) .L M¢ce 1 '
The California Alliance -,.r r aCouanty is ex�jiectd
RTP FUnding So where would that
�� ts k7 Ito needtmoreYthan
tOC JObS,meanWlllle,1185 a3''{ , S i ' �i 'neVJ•tI'anSit money }' """ f ,
reorganized its own ' , • f 4 come-from. Largely 384 mllhoii fors. r'
coalition to fight for a I � `t" from road and �g'',,-p ti n'&I t rehablll ' }
+ ry, F : -.i ��,p 7 ..i4; afi's"� , r �t it • atlon,al MNIore 4,
sensible RIF that t Y} �r i?'tla;irli , highway project ?"t thany$150'mdhon 42:
serves motorists and ,0" ; 4:1 ` f '( � r `y a'l,3< t.:r: -1`i -,ird funding at a time r-,o""f that i e'1 iS ;;
travelers'as well - »"rtc �t r o ( ; r ,J v- s" when there's none 9 nfunded „, AI
x«A t)i , Road 36/o : o-z (�'`-' ,4.t�ul k `. ii , •% r a �.. _ t5
business and tt� " ,Y fi �y f�s� 'iU f nt"- 1 i _ t 3f's.. to spare. y <. In
a.0 " mxy ,a y 4,1 t r + _ If,roads and ,d
commun ty l d a,+lh at c " Maintenances -
while staying far vr�r t � r'i sy er highways are,p is
a t 4'fti ,y, alone of d e Bay a b s h }{
afield from transit ±,+',cl st ': A"' d3o/ s ` ' hotrmproved ,i 6
t +I l +;=./ PPit,83/o i' - Area's local s streets
M
� +m xi Y � 0
��'� ` t r z Merced County} ^�
overkill.Business f•; t �is '�iir 4Y§ ez '4 r _ x and roads faces a 't}ramc dongestio�ft
r a �. 4 C �i s bell , S -a l ,' `r! + V
and Labor for Better € t ri $5.6 billion shortfall will increa$e 200
Blk'e%Walk t
y "`�E 1 g� a „j s +�-yC a 'S sd#'� � s �.
Transportation,the .+. / '�?�l A SC- r F Y it n>� i�a. over the next 20 m " a t '> ,'the P xa viii m ..E" tbs r M lr`:Percent{gaiC�'
same Alliance-led �r e2 , I y, }� ' " iris years,even though $ next 10 years tt
group that fought s 1 y e' ,N ,,rsat t A. some$2 billion in road `" "art l r
successfully to get .'ft 7 , i998 RTP Vr aC z *.r .Sources Caltrans J
ge 1, a1,E yr y 3c ; , „I'. projects,mostly repaving, y 1
County half-cent transporta- 'tilt J Source MT9Ozt F.k a ' - are Set to begin'in the Bay Bay.4rea Metropolitan;:fm
Trans ortatibt -, 0
don sales tax extended in last #� e +. Area by this summer. -,o p P 'z
Y Cpmmtsston '-i -
November's election,is expanding and Sacfemento�„,�` .. z t
forming its own proposal for the RIP. - CATS weighs in 'gla� cil ua +4fis',
The RIP is as important to`business interests Of course,Bay Area transportation planners of;Go eminent ^ t 4
as it is to transit advocates.The goods that keep are not the only ones to be hit by anti-highway �'Merreeal CDbnty'"�
the economy vibrant travel on trucks cars and rail, lobbyists and anti,car lawsuits In Sacramento last �,�T/ie RoaMpformatron°f=
not buses.With that in mind,the Alliance,and the fall a district court'judge threw out part of a i'sfina rdrm r '` iil}Kx ,`•
•Port of Oakland co hosted an Apr 1 MTC k briefing suit that attempted o shut down 59 regional road t &—. , tom,`;�• r.
for BLBT that drew more than 70 concerned projects because,the suit claimed,they would have ir: K• •j « t
c $ :
representatives from the East Bay business and brought the Sacramento region into non-compli- � �� tit�'{Y'
labor community The meeting starkly differed ante with the Clean Air Act. I,,iss +r,i. sr Y,i' '•from a typical MTC public hearing in that business The Alliance participated in the fight against i';„lai c ' t-t `4' ';
people gave their views to MTC staffers and the the suit by joining a coalition of business,labor '> a 4t„h` rl.jr:A4.Ag
two attending commissioners in a business-only and citizen groups called Citizens Alliance for `.„ t1R'z"2�3 ;'.. 1-
g.,What MTC heard was a cry for better roads Transportation Solutions,which rallied support s”.s°F`( l i v t °,Cti
�I�wa smoother movement of and for the target of the claim,the Sacramento.°rear '
y pc
,people,and a realistic approach to transit finding. Metropolitan Transportation Plan. l l ,, `
A Similar meeting took place in the North Now under the directorship of California Alliance Fmrer/° ` l
Bay:in mid-April. for Jobs Sacramento region field representative Joe `i " > ¢?rlir ti `
Of course,the battle to get finds is only Cruz,CATS is growing in membership and . it yN, s 41.::<,;b 'i ,
continued next page 'e 'x 'S + `
The NIV Spnn�2n-.s,wr .�if
.:. rnt ' oils .tl'+
• siete;I,,,fli‘1,,I;;AS.-0''..•"„a;;:tir, 1),.;:Ii."Th.±:-.Y.- ".":t1;--`" , -‘,.. -.Pr:,-..S.:ew ;1•Q ti -,j-4, .179.):74 r.;-,..ivi'W;;",,.:i ,Willorgsit°,:mi4.1.7.4.::-!;.7.4p5,444irny.itoiiip..,,ylimp,
;:;jjklitiiiev :..:::::'-4 3:.;.::”ci.....,.Rec§iiiiiii iTravel getiiiitii:Fereeasts:.A4! ::vitH ,5,, ,Okit,;,:et[r=1,, ,P7,11istio, Niti
r..- ..,,,...,„. .- ,,,...-,..,f • • „,.„,„„: "•:-.•,- ,:een:.'!''' ',7_7-12e!'2.- ---,s,-.'.",•... "71).'.:-:-., ._:t._:fr,„,... . ..,, .r.., IV hange4. ...
.." ARcithoildat:j'ft;! .•ff
?rota I Daily OdisoriTripi:(thatioanci )cri ir.,.',V4:4...-:.,:.,-T:4 ...:',4::.:14'cl13;0761riArd:figt24716,;:i:"■•'.";L1.':-..5.,::1_370/6"S„:d
CY '...dirteiiii152 ri:i VV,..,t,r2Iii Total DailitTrifilit Bcialciiiiiirni-iiifst-irVds) /3;i,, its..r?..iitit -.;?_.7-i,Fit3J.4-sy..Y.f.536. thtl?'1'; .061‘1447iP-ec-.7, 0613)44".;
?•'(:.I''. ."e°1 Te 4.77 A 11-.4:'1.- .-,‘Aiiel'aiibaili.venkthiviiiii-Timeleiii Regialial(thdaaanda); ;:ri.kY;c 93 643',14:t93:;;I:$:-'l a&,596 vtikYit:i5 4;;I:4'46%I.- ;:ii
cr;;;&i.;;;;;;4?t .i 1 ?1,',.:- .j,'''' c f .a-,Average Daily'Vehicle Miles Traveled Intbiregionali(thausiiids),41,*11:4:065VAt,10`;f4no,20-kn:s .:..t")4115°S1
,,q'rwr' • •• '''''''. '..i.`6-Aidiage Roadway glieeltal(milei4hoiiduring dm-i!pdak),(ert, *q.\"C4Nittlik4;2■142.4':.41-411.1ar141.;a9.61tiCr'4,10.1.1i4.-7Woh '211•6 11''1 Ciikeii0 tr;" 7:7■‘'..tiiiCoeSiiDifiAletaie Dilliilefiield'Hatricif iiiliCiti6UsinaKriwit."7,ICI5tYV-iqcin71%%3^36647,,Erg?'7,rirt.7.1:2490/4*
; •1,'Tliacy$'11:rtrfiiii,"it”:, ,-.,•,r.'4,:dt■viiigetrivellYriieldi.v(16i1570iiinuieibi-tlii, strfittIi.IWY,X.ii,K4C.r.21:=2iO4-5; :iiSin+'."5. 26:9iiiiiiii;24Aliiii.4-105Ysie
'1 '7;',7;?O '13::;ftl(-IirW-45 ;iaAtili"-MEtiEf4-PtWt.1114F- Nagi'WI.eik'ilttWiiMYTx-c764,P4
;;-,47-.A1-: kit; .; tti '7.14;;;I-Wii;ll.y ?li?1.;.f.oreeasiii.as,..ma-,tha aripleTr4,5T i2:1,19-9816T11;-ran06.ft.ab96-4*exi ; 21Argy.7.:41A1:,'"eto-.7:g„.,Ac,
4.,7;i:A 999 tilIa■,76v--7,=4C)I1...; Average Draily.4claklaufs,FP/Da.laY:74.7 a measure of iF,14'Pc't" "If spoof'14,1:r.ath-G,cgIttgl7s-that ar°lis?Mtulfr1!&rg.Eel4YInSs'‘1htaPPBa`29'ilii#4,41
%,,, _. -. ,i.. ,--,....!....,,ii,“:,_;...;:„*.large in comparison to 1990 include the accumulation of small changes tor large numbers of regional trier Ttiese.increases should not be construed to mean that,every 9.$7,
-014-the'rAmericarr-'4 t;;;. 4-ek.-'11;indivclisiitnptirne■ailliicrease by tiiis percentageT,,-- ....,..,ifir,,I.ratidzAiirt:?, tzt.,k;;;I:rtziit,..4,3,,rec-,:51:447.Ti.,5,-,iy.t-v.:45-ta",1.1,,,,,-.1.,:nii .. r.i
rintHighirtiy'Userfsr,-,41;',.19,,Z?'''''t source:Ant 5-.1 -7 ,c 3-■ 0-,:,r_c:ht- , .,,ItPNc.):-Pi.2,r,.1,;11,1;;;.:ti..iv-zitfa, ojc.14;;D
•.1-•••.• .= , .-, ,,,,,•i:-,•_,e/N:-•,..„..•,-,„:-.,• 1••• ,,-;.- ••••••••• , r'.,••••••7,#•"-T•,•':-'4••- ,• •*--,,I,-,,c :_.--,•1•.•;--,,-,,.q zr,:ar„ ..4.4,-..s&l:1-,-.0,,7,,,n-S,W,,c*,E;;,,..,;,4,c .,•,••.%,,,t2,,,,i,...:,-,...•••a.vz 1
Yi Pe.1 efi"WoiditOtii!'''t
.k.,-...:;;: advocating that the current revision process of Clara counties last fall.But what will vastly improve
i.411 Isictosu'intiirribdr.fortyntatic,' the MTP produce a plan that serves the area's the chances is the reduction of the voter threshold to
ti...thaf;tum6rovingrihem,,.. motorists,businesses and workers.CATS is also 55 percent,a recommendation made in March by the
infouldsavOiver'&934;;L.--- active in the effort to widen Rte.70 heading state Commission on Building for the 21st Century
toward Marysville and participates in an ongoing Not only would lowering the supermajority
con&erve,fuel,...,izo.;=-i-s-- Sacramento County stakeholders forum dealing hurdle make it easier to extend existing taxes,but
. •reduce..pollutioncand with congestion relief other counties would find it easier to inaugurate
.-. enliance,productiiiiist t Also based in Sacramento is Transportation them.In counties without transportation sales
Ls.--ty. The economic,.it% California,an Alliance-supported group involved taxes,the dollar figures attached to their needs are
s-liteY941*.PV; ! - 91)i-fri'''.,,l in statewide transportation issues.The organization smaller,but the demand for Landing is no less
r;;:ilieetior,qe-lievindOitst+-;i • • 1
is vigorously supporting a state-constitutional crushing and no less visible.Glenn,Kings,
; .ppjPat.S1S'aStoUnd; iL7 1 . 1 1 A
1444-4."•-1.."Alra"r""' ' ''''rr.z4M4 amendment mat would permanently dedicate the Humboldt Tulare and Yolo counties,for example,
'-,Tgi'l'aPnall.W?flPaJoissr,! . .
-sibitizgirtrialtitiliWid64; sales tax on gasoline to transportation uses.The have turned miles of roadway back to gravel status
ii.Wathicilieriliib`vrli-;;&6aiiti earmarking for the tax,which this year will raise an because of maintenance funding shortfalls-
--L.-Qt.-at. ti --- •
Pcztthan,4336 billion in?).0,. estimated$13 billion,expires in 2005,leaving the Faced with such dc-evolution,smaller but
;;. economic..benefits-.4...,.. taxes open for diversion to non-transportation uses nonetheless growing counties are contemplating
ti,.'4f r."--.911proving4,:,‘ '.Li: Unfortunately,any kind of major transportation taking matters into their own coffers and bringing
P!It
44):. kcongystior0.;sit it; legislation is going nowhere for now With blackouts transportation sales taxes before voters.
riP,51,9-1,i4„11,.€1..1's„471.6401.-'Ge; rolling,and Michainn(Michigan!)brazenly wooing Merced County for example,projects a 5150
):14 t9.9.-_,TPartlif,t.r,11_Pg. X.4- California Oorporititis,and budget reserves being million maintenance funding shortfall in the next
0, ifirglig„fiztotieri):tipki..ift " ravenously consumed by energy purchases,the 20 years and a-200 percent congestion increase in
Itese.ibottletneck.s;r1.,15
electeds in Sacramento have taken an offramp half that time if its roads and highways remain
k.666-1-A;iiect..to.:,,,,.„.„,
s.,.... .,,,-;.., .„..•,, from the roads crisis. unimproved.To make Rue they don't,county
O-tt-,,,frsamige...,.z.1.1.2AP...,9-.04.ri?P;N:y
pitime.ianid if dgikaleiiieco4.t Where transportatiOn's radar screen remains lit officials have assembled a 5100 million capital
letiiiiarItirce`A'elifflfrir during the energy crisis is at the county level. improvement expenditure plan that will accompany
tin, ,, ..1, j.:44,..,/
a tiansportation sales tax they might bring before
isfii WereirP9Pti' llnst.
-ii,;-..giiitii4,,,,• 477---..-4:17.,.st-i, Funding challenge looms voters this November.That decision hinges in part
-rf-Air
grnitirr'ti;P;,•;!:. .;;4;2 California cuttently has 16 so-called"self-help" on a phone poll about the tax that Merced County
Cr.,1,',": '„,...1",:t
1:1 ,;::-., ,, . counties that have et-tatted special transportation was conducting as The All went to press.
'"itk....„),,y53•124
.:,..i.c.-,.V.:,',.:t,424 sales taxes.The revenue from those taxes accounts What Merced County officials do know is that
.0.-544.,1P41.41,4-'4.4 • for roughly a third of California's entire transporta- locals seem to support construction.Jesse Brown,
7ifi.i's. lion budget and are key to local mobility In executive director of the Merced County
.1)tasiiie.z, trtit
'440istrti,: .. ;;;;,,:kcir: the next 10 years, 13 of those counties Association of Governments,notes
_
lI6iitt;SSIIti.,:s""li". tget5/ will see their transportation taxes -1-iyri-;44:ifn-V-4.9%.-9-,4,,_ that no large opposition has
..-7-x- li.'gri)tSiSAY:\''Ott'■
''"Pj..T1'5.;'ef4 1:afit,cf, .-4.,Arz-
expire.Consequently;projects ...,-,c ...,:,:72,k.,,,-ts.i...!sfi:C,4',..m21144:" ,$"...4. surfaced to road and highway
':riC.f.SCAL:r1,3-..-it"' and jobs will evaporate 4-VCommuteiMcide$plit : projects in Merced area.
tt'''s Th;)";•efrits„s..-'--11;;,iiit,-;",b,'{a:‘ ,S.:-, -,:mi.lhoii. •ptiefs6n:iiiphwimbe-aeld.ii V',:ii-i-7-11-
'' --r-‘7,-x-,4-403?-4 iia7cr„..:: finless local voters pass
'-'-';'''' - '-- "I'`;”- „„,*„
On the coning;
-riStr?.i.lfile."' ; - wr-..it tii4s; -,.i.
.?i, terii4rtucitsva;4iy., joik! extensions.
t.,
r- kat?'tone% ,, ,t--ii:- That will be no _s.trait-i; ,-cisillIMIM4412.traf?%ii-Pt.„ he said,"People are
-iittsiSt-it sizti -
; ST;;-siti.;:x : ;'...:, St _....
If erelfhr:S1 c.741i4-7.1' C..*11... 4q./..Are...v II,' :ii./,7•:Ze.i ..4i,;;IA.hr interested in how
'-.-'14;6'c:fit tr-Aus."7 mean feat since ;11\4,4..1-1-iii..s '31 4 6Y., sr..; tts.".tribtit'Ac.!.'.:, quickly some of
riNe -•.',,,'3.,,,,:, X .,1:•eY,*^k
,11.1,;gt 4:teel;:.1.1.:■";d:71 Passage Of special s. a rs.,,,s.i.is-2-/-.4iter,4- these projects can
f- 0!) e,•:, :-•+?, - - : !0,1,..‘1‘..al.:Je0.-1:-“b4.',,, 3 C -.' 11,4,e-”Igr'stt-00.7.161*,:lit. '
trativiiii ye nri;:.; use taxes requires .; si,;.slik.s.ai,,tre.,i'jii` b rzrAtii,x-t-JA:ItViit' be done."
a two-thirds (4:inh i,",-C142.-.--'4i..‘li'J 2 - ki * 111.04,4 4eidt.44,IP.Ct4i,i'S The question,
gil ,44°'til‘•—41^-3:,t 11 "
I; .9::i',ri-,A*
a. 1,5 Ehnit:leM'aik)2 -.4E as always,is
tritts,.., ,/ I.4,1,7f,....:W..-.4..,. . stilaerniajoritY” ilatI'd* ;'2.1.4'‘' is..-ia,.,-.4, aeritat,ilttsvi
i i. Fk,gt-'71.. -,1::--,'“,,.;'` , ',2 l ..
ta,..3i, -„,,,, i.,,,,,,.; Not it cant be ,..,i- its-1irt(*)1* ' `sr tt ip,...3,9iir, ig_.:6•.,A. whether they'll be
P"4 :pli-7.--..ii. , iii,'
k'1,"`I' v done,as proved n le;et...gr iisCs5c:-; it-Y. i. . - t. t. ,,1-. -Autstii-ssiingestiissisiti willing to pay for
44,s,Z(.4,r-,..-;•.;,_16,c: 7,-...., -a ' i 1'44 .2.',;(- ..41"...,.:,,..-. 7,..i :ri,'.' ' :,ofijA tir, ,,PC?.:-:-.17: :■•-.4,,,,,,1■4-4%, , i
1' 1/4-t- v. Alameda and Santa ....ri. Oir:t e .7 ;:=';''41' '"''''', -.:,- ,• - ',-,i";,--4„1:$4:7,j.V:?,-1-ZAtict+" tnem.ally
a. 5-ts`,.-i -a-..tit .''7.t....":"zi ',te #,:iiiit:;'‘i 'ir';'-.^.1'1''." 'i'Jj'i,''SodiCei Mit L-i -'?:.?:$11-(. .--Yht L--;nr l'els1494
5.,,,-.6., Rrri90901-:..:*le'my 1.•:-.4•524,--,-:7! ,-,-..e,:-,,,,iy,-: ? :•„,--. ' . :(:•-,L,Lf_;‘,../..v,;4:40,2tct
Zts:6 „};4,1. ' '.--,..4•.-,:i, - ..-•4,, •fk;•-a•-„,-:-,?4...4.4z•iiito
. •
C
WATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Contractors' Meeting
• AGENDA
Monday, June 4, 2001
9:00 a.m. — 11:30.a.m.
Laguna Treatment Plant
Estuary/Wetlands Conference Room 4, ?`A■
4300 Llano Road, Santa Rosa, CA
A. Call to Order
B. Introductions
C. Public Comment
D. Approval of May 14, 2001 Minutes
E. Update on Impairment Condition MOU Implementation Tim Anderson, SCWA
F. Water Year Status and Deliver Projections SCWA Staff
G. Update on SCWA Projects SCWA Staff
(Collector 6, South Transmission System Project, Sonoma
Aqueduct, Emergency Power at'ElyBooster Station)
H. Washing Machine Rebate.Program Status SCWA Staff
Schedule for Master Agreement Negotiation/Public John Nelson, WRM
Outreach and Commitment,to Initiate Process
J. Regional Salmonid Recovery Plan MOU SCWA Staff
K. Update on Emergency Power Generation Facilities SCWA Staff
L. Other Business
M. Items for Next Agenda
N. Adjourn
agenda060401
•
•
TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 2001
Cas Lai,
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
SONOMA COUNTY
REGULAR MEETING
SPECIAL DISTRICTS MICHAEL J. CALE 1ST DISTRICT
SUPERVISOR'S CHAMBERS MIKE KERNS 2ND DISTRICT
SONOMA COUNTY TIM SMITH 3RD DISTRICT
ADMINISTRATION BLDG. PAUL L.KELLEY 4TH DISTRICT
575 ADMINISTRATION DR.,ROOM 102A MIKE REILLY 5TH DISTRICT
SANTA ROSA,CALIFORNIA 95403-2887 MIKE CHRYSTAL COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
• PHONE 707-565-2241 STEVEN WOODSIDE COUNTY COUNSEL
FAX 707-565-3778
WEB SITE http://www.sonoma-county.org/main/
The Board of Supervisors welcomes}you to its meetings which are regularly scheduled each Tuesday,and
your interest is encouraged and appreciated.
Public Transit Access to the County Administration Center
Sonoma County Transit: Rt. 20,30,44,48,60,62,64
Santa Rosa CityBus:Rt. 14
Golden Gate Transit: Rt.80
For transit information call (707)'576-RIDE or 1-800-345-RIDE.
The agenda is divided into two sections:
CONSENT CALENDAR: These matters include routine,financial and,administrative actions,appear in the
blue section and are usually approved by a single.majority vote. Any Board Member may remove an item
from the consent calendar.
REGULAR CALENDAR: These items include significant and administrative actions of special interest,
appear in the white section and are classified by program area.
The regular calendar also includes"Set Matters",which are noticed hearings,work sessions and public
hearings.
ADDENDUM: If there is an addendum to the agenda,it will be posted at the,above referenced web site by
Friday at 5:00 p.m.the week before the meeting.
ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON A MATTER ON THE
AGENDA: PLEASE WALK TO THE ROSTRUM AND AFTER RECEIVING RECOGNITION FROM THE
CHAIR,GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS,AND YOUR COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. IN ORDER
THAT ALL INTERESTED PARTIES HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK,PLEASE BE BRIEF AND
LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE SUBJECT UNDER DISCUSSION. TIME LIMITATIONS SHALL BE
AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR.OR BOARD.
Agenda - June 5, 2001
Page 2 •
Tuesday. June 5, 2001
8:30 A.M.
• Call to order and pledge of allegiance
Presentation of retirement certificates
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Cons ent Calendar
Community Development Services
Northern Sonoma County Air Pollution Control District
Sonoma County Water Agency
Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District
GENERAL.ICOUNfl GOVERNMENT
Approval of Agenda
Consent items pulled
Items to be held
Off.Agenda Items
Commendatory/memorial resolutions
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Consent Calendar • •
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Regular Calendar
Sonoma County Agricultural_Preservation and Open Space District
Sonoma County Water Agency
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Regulai Calendar •
Development Services
Health Services
Criminal Justice.System;Services
Closed Session:
1. The Board of.Supervisors will consider the following in closed session:
•
Conference with Labor Negotiator
Agency negotiator: Ray Myers/Taryn Lewis
Employee Organization: Engineers,& Scientists of California(ESC)
SEIU Local 707
(Govt Code Section.54957.6)'
2. The Board of,Supervisors will consider the-following in closed session:
Conference with Legal•Counsel-Existing Litigation.
Name of Case: Michael Passot v. County of Sonoma
Workers' Compensation Appeals Board No.:Unassigned •
Agency claimed.against: Sonoma County Sheriffs Department .
(Govt. Code Section 54956.9(a))
ti
•
Agenda- June 5,:2001
• Page 3
Closed Session (Cont'd):
3. The Board of Supervisors will consider the following in closed session:
Conference with Legal Counsel-Existing Litigation
Name of Case: Oberfelder v. County of Sonoma
United'States District Court, No C-98-1470 MHP
(Govt. Code Section:54956.9(a))
4: The Board of Supervisors will consider the+following in closed session:
Conference with Legal Counsel-Anticipated Litigation
Significant exposure to litigation,pursuant;to,subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9:
Decision''in Warren v. Saenz-lawsuif against',California Department of Social
Services requiring licensing of Valley of the Moon Children's Home
(Govt. Code Section 54956.9(b))
5. The Board of Supervisors will consider the following in closed session:
Conference with•Real;Property,Negotiator
Property: Portions of Kelly Road adjacent to Soda Springs Reserve and/or adjacent
to Countycommunications facility
Negotiating Parties:- (County) Mike Wagner
• (Owners) Tim Fitzpatrick, attorney for Dave and Bunny Lewers
Under Negotiation: Terms ofright of way
(Govt. Code Section 54956.8)
2:00 Report on Closed Session
2:00 Personal Appearances
2:00 Permit and Resource Management Department
Review and possible action on the following:
1. Acts and Determinations of Planning •
Commission/Board of Zoning Adjustments
• 2. Acts and Determinations of Project Review
and Advisory Committee
3. Administrative Determinations of theDirector
of Permit and Resource.Management
•
Agenda - June 5, 2001 •
Page 4
Regular Calendar'Public Hearings:
2:15 Hearing: File No.N/A
Description: To consider an Airport Master Plan Amendment, approval'of lease-
of land to a tenant for construction of one executive hangar, two
hangars for small aircrafrand an access road in,the southeast
portion of the Airport
Env. Doc.: Mitigated Negative Declaration
Location: Southeast corner of the Charles M. Schultz-Sonoma County
Airport
Sup. Dist.: Dist. #4
2:30 Hearing: PRMD File No. ADA 00=0001
Description: To consider an appeal by George.Forrester;ofaBoard,ofZoning
Adjustments decision to uphold'an appeal-in part,.finding that the
owner of Golden Bear Lodge has violated County Code•Section
26-94-040(a),but reversing staff's detennination;thatthe legal
non-conforming use of the Golden Bear'Lodge is terminated •
Env. Doc.: N/A
Location: 1717 Adobe Canyon Road, Kenwood
Sup.Dist Dist. #1
•
11111
•
Agenda- June 5, 2001
Page 5
•
Friday, June 8, 2001
9:00 A.M.
•
Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Chambers
575 Administration Dr.,Rut 102A
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Public Policy Facilitating Committee (PPFC)
. The committee consists of the?folloWing members:
Board of Supervisors/Directors of the Sonoma County Water Agency(3)
Appointees by the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors (3)
U.S: Army Corps of Engineers (1)
National Marine Fisheries;(1)
State Resources Agency(1)
California Regional Water Quality Control Board (1)
• Will meet to discuss, disseminate information and take public comment on the
implementation of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Ad as called for in a
Memorandum of Understanding with the United States Army Corp of Engineers,
National Marine Fisheries Service and the Sonoma County Water Agency.
The meeting agenda is attached
•
•
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
• CONSENT CALENDAR
JUNE 5, 2001.
III. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION/AUDITOR.CONTROLLER
1. . Interagency Agreement for,Fiscal•Services
Concurrent approval authorizing execution of an Interagency Agreement between
the Auditor-Controller and the Community'Development Commission in an
•
amount not to exceed $50;000 annually for fiscal services for the following:
Community.Development Commission
Board of Supervisors
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
• 2. Dutton Place, Phase I:,Revise Maximum Affordable,Sales.Prices
Concurrent resolution amending Affordable Housing Sales Agreement to revise
maximum affordable sales prices for new three-bedroom moderate-income homes
on lots 1.1 and 13'throngh 15 of Phase Ito $254,700 and$248,400 for the
following:
Community Development Commission
Board of Supervisors
NORTHERN SONOMA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
3. Appropriation Transfer
Resolution authorizing appropriation transfer of$36,100 from Unanticipated
Revenue (State Subvention Funds and Air Pollution Fine Funds) to Northern
Sonoma Courity Air Pollution Control District - General - Equipment
(4/5ths vote-required)
• -1-
•
SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Cont'd) June 5, 2001
CONSENT CALENDAR.(Cont'd) •
SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
4. Kawana Booster Pump Station,Project— Change Order No. 2
Resolution approving Change Order No..2 ($14,259.74—Increase) and a 4
working day time extension for Kawana Booster Pump Station Project
(Contractor: Argonaut Constructors)
5. Watershed Grant.Administration Services
Approve supporting the provision of contract administration services by the
Sonoma,County Water Agency for the$1 million grantreceivedTby the County'of
Sonoma through Proposition 1 3
SONOMA VALLEY COUNTY SANITATION,:DISTRICT (3-Member Board)
6. Sonoma Valley County Sanitation,District Aeration System Improvements'Phase'Brand
Decant Tank Removal Project Advertise:.for Bids
Resolution adopting plans-and specifications for the Sonoma Valley County
•
Sanitation'District Aeration;System Improvements Phase IIIand?Decant Tank
Removal Project, and authorizing advertisement for bids to be received by
10:00 a.m.on Thursday, July 5, 2001
7. Extension of;Local Emergency
Resolution extending the;existence%ofa.local emergency due to main sewer trunk
lines deterioration on Broadway north and south of Leveroni Road
•
•
•
•
CONSENT CALENDAR '
• BOARD OF.SUPERVISORS
JUNE 5, 2001
I. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
EMERGENCY SERVICES
8. Appropriation Transfer
Resolution appropriating$79,800 of Unanticipated Revenue to Emergency
Services—Service and Supplies and Fixed Asset accounts (4/5ths vote required)
9. Lease/Purchase Fire Engine
Resolution authorizing the financing ofone fire engine, and directing the Director
of Emergency Services to execute all necessarydocuments pertaining to the
governmental lease-purchase agreement with Municipal Services Group, Inc.
(MSG)
10. Lease/Purchase Intermediate Sedan
• Resolution authorizing:the financing of one intermediate sedan, and directing the
Director of Emergency.Services to execute all necessary documents pertaining to
the governmental lease-purchase agreement with Municipal Services Group, Inc.
(MSG)
GENERAL SERVICES
•
11. Hall of Justice ADA and Ergonomic Upgrades
Resolution authorizing the Chairman to issue a Notice of Completion for the Hall
of Justice ADA and Ergonomic Upgrades project
12. Bridges Program Expansion
Authorize the Chairman to execute a change order to the County' agreement with
Knight/Wagner Architecture in the amount of$7,534.75, for additional design
work for various code and maintenance upgrades, with no change in the contract
time
13. Sonoma Veterans Building HVAC
Resolution authorizing the Chairman to execute a Notice of Completion for the
Sonoma Veterans Building HVAC project and to.take certain other actions in
connection'with the agreement with Reliance Enterprises, Inc.
111 -3-
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont'd) June 5, 2001 •
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
14. Contract with KPMG Consulting, Inc.
Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the contact with KPMG
Consulting, Inc. for maintenance services for the Sonoma.County Online Famis
Computerized Accounting System at a total cost of$36,000
V. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
HEALTH SERVICES
15. Hospital.Downgrade Impact Evaluation Reports
Accept the Impact Evaluation•Reports on the Downgrade;of Emergency Services
at Healdsburg General Hospital and Palm Drive Hospital and authorize the
Director of Health Services to transmit reports to the California Department of
Health Services
16. Mental Health Residential Treatment and Support.Services
Authorize the Director of Health Services'tosign and execute four separate
contracts and any future amendments that do not significantly change the program •.
content, or do not change funding amounts, with Community Support Network,
Inc. (July'1, 2001-through June 30,2002) ($1,028,238)
17. Transition House Construction Project
Resolution-authorizing budgetary adjustments to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget for
the Capital Improvement,Project Fund,and the Health Services Alcohol Program
Fund in the amount of$50,000 (4/5ths vote required)
18. Sonoma County Commission on AIDS—Distinguished Services.Awards
Resolution honoring fin individuals and three organizations for distinguished
service and dedication to improving the quality of life of Sonoma-County
residents affected by HIV disease
4- •
•
CONSENT CALENDAR(Cont'd) June 5, 2001
• HEALTH SERVICES (Cont'd)
19. Mental.Health Vocational Rehabilitation Services
Resolution authorizing budgetary adjustment to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget
within the General Fund—Department of Health Services in the amount of
$20,505 (4/5ths vote required)
Authorize the Director of Health Services to sign and execute Amendment
Number 1.to the FY 2000-01 Agreement Number 22742 with the State
Department of Rehabilitation,raising the FY 2000-01 contract maximum from
$27,000.to $47,505($20,505)
20. Fatal Child Abuse:.andNeglect Surveillance
Authorize the Director of Health Services to sign and execute Service
Authorization #00-92052 with the State Department of Health Services for the
period of 01/01/01 through 06/30/01 in the.amountof$2,000
Resolution authorizing budgetary adjustments to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget—
Department of Health Services —in the amount of$2;000 (4/5ths vote required)
• 21. Local Emergency due to.the Existence of a Critical Local Public Health Crisis
Resolution renewing the February 29;.2000 declaration of a state of local
emergency due to the existence of a critical local public health crisis relative to
the transmission ofhuman immunodeficiency virustaind hepatitis C through the
use of contaminated needles
HUMAN SERVICES
•
22. Cal WIN Implementation Support Contract
Authorize the'.Director of the Human Services Department, or designee, to sign
and execute the contract between the Sonoma County Human Services
Department and GovConnnect, Inc.to provide project management and consulting
services for the.Ca1WORKs Information Network.(Ca1WIN),implementation in
Sonoma County and to sign any future amendments that do notsignificantly
change program content and do not increase overall contract amount
23. Child Welfare Services
Resolution authorizing budgetary adjustments to the 2000-01 Final Budget for the
Human Services Department in the aniountof$90,000 (4/5ths vote required)
(Held from 5/22/01)
• -5-
CONSENT CALENDAR (Coned) . June 5, 2001 •
HUMAN SERVICES (Coned)
24. Area Agency on Aging—Funding Augmentation
Resolution authorizing budgetary adjustments to the 2000-01 Human Services
Department Final Budget in the amount of$30,124 (4/5ths vote required)
Resolution authorizing the Director of the Human Services Department, or
designee;to execute Standard Agreement FF-0001-27, Amendment#2, with the
California Department of Aging in the amount of$1,534,525 for FY 2000-01
(Held from 5/22/01)
25. In-Home Supportive.Services (IHSS) Advisory Committee Appointment
Resolution appointing.replacement IHSS Advisory Committee'member
26. 2001-2002 Contract.Renewal with Sonoma County Junior College District
Authorize:the Director of the Human Services Department, or designee, to sign
and,execute 2001-02 contract renewal with Sonoma County Junior College
District.for SonomaWORKS Services ($222,013) and to sign any future
amendments that do not significantly change program content and do not increase
overall funding
27. Area Agency on Aging FY 2001-2002 Funding Recommendations
Resolutioniapproving AAA'recommendations for the allocation of FY 2001-02
funding in the amount of$1,534,547
Authorize the Director of the Human Services Departmenttocsign°and execute
FY 2001-02 service provider contracts and to sign any future amendments:that do
not significantly change the program content of funding amounts
28. 2001-2002 Supportive Services Contract Renewals
Authorize the Director of the Human Services Department, or designee, to sign
and execute 2001-02 contract renewals with the following,agencies and to sign
any future amendments that do not significantly:change program,content and do
not increase overall funding:
Community Child Care Council: Workforce Investment Act Child.Care, $99,860
Community Child Care Council: Resource and Referral Services,$30,754
Jewish-Family and Children's Services: Family Loan Program,$55,000
-6- •
CONSENT CALENDAR (COnt'd) June 5, 2001
• HUMAN SERVICES (Cont'd)
29. Youth Education & EmpIoyment Services Contracts
Authorize the Director of the Human Services Department, or designee, to sign
contracts;for the 2001-02 program year for Youth Education & Employment
Services regional,programs and.to.sign any,future amendments that do not
significantly ch,apgeprogram content and do not increase overall funding;
contracts are with Circuit Rider Productions;.Social Advocates for Youth,
Sonoma County Adult and Youth Development, Petaluma People Services
Center, West County Community Services (51;165,372)
II. FISCAL SERVICES
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER,
30. Annual Report of Revolving Funds •
Resolution accepting the Annual Report of Revolving Funds as of June 30, 2000
in accordance with Government Code Section 29321.1(C)
31. Audit Report
Review and acceptance:of the audit report,of Sonoma County Water System
Service Zones (Salmon Creek, Freestone, Fitch Mountain, and Jenner) for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999
III. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD
32. Extension of Time Limited Positions
Resolution extending four(4) time limited positions for a period of two years, for
the Film program (1.0 FTE Administrative Aide and 1.0 FTE Receptionist) and
the Tourism program (1.0 FTE Administrative Aide and 1.0 FTE Receptionist)
• -T
CONSENT CALENDAR(Cont'd) June 5, 2001 •
PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
33. 3836R Permit Extensions
Resolutions issuing extensions for Ordinance No. 3836R Permits to the following
applicants:
a) Bohan and Canelis-Austin Creek Ready Mix (Austin Creek)
b) City of Santa Rosa"Geysers Project"
c) Department of Transportation and Public Works for 4 summer crossings
(Russian River)
d) Department of Transportation and Public Works for rWestside Road Bridge
(Dry Creek)
e) Monte Rio Recreation and Parks public beach preparation including
installation, maintenance,and removal of floating piers and safety buoys
(Russian River)
f) Murphy-Goode Vineyards for the installation, maintenance, and removal of a
seasonal agricultural bridge (Russian River)
g) Russian River Recreation and Park.District for the installation,maintenance,
and removal of two recreation dams (Russian River)
.h) Sonoma County Water Agency for various streams and channels
•
i) Sonoma County Water Agency for installation, maintenance,.and removal of a
fish ladder, Healdsburg Veterans Memorial Dam (Russian River) •,
(4/5ths vote required)
34. Creekside Village Subdivision Covenants; Conditions, and Restrictions(CC&Rs)
Resolution approving the amendments to the CC&Rs as requested by the
Creekside Village Homeowner's Association (File MIS 160.694)
35. Farm Family Agricultural Unit; Ron Wollmer (File #ZPE 00-0191)
Authorize Chairman to execute an agricultural Easement and Covenant regarding
a Farm Family Agricultural Unit for the propertyat6520 Jamison Road, Santa
Rosa APN 049-020-015;:zoned LIA (Land:Intensive Agriculture), B6 40 acre
density, J (Mobile Home`Exclusion), Z(Second Unit Exclusion), SD (Scenic
Design), Supervisorial District
-8- •
•
•
CONSENT.CALENDAR (Cont'd) June 5, 2001
• PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT (Cont'd)
36. Blue Rock Quarry Professional Services Agreement
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement for Professional Services with
Leonard Charles Associates in the amountiof$205;680 for preparation of the
Environmental ImpactReport for the Blue Rock Quarry Expansion Project
Resolution authorizing,appropriation of$205,680 of unanticipated revenue from
Blue Rock Quarry to fund the cost of the Environmental Impact Report
(4/5ths vote,required) (Held from 5/22/01)
REGIONAL PARKS
•
37. Appropriation of Unanticipated Revenue
Resolution appropriating unanticipated revenue in the amount of$19,750 for
purchase of a replacement tractor/mower to improve maintenance and operational
efficiency on the north coast (4/Sths vote required)
• TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
38. Vehicle Pollution.Mitigation Projects
Resolution authorizing the Transit System Manager to file an application with the
Norther Sonoma County Air Pollution.Control-District seeking up to $258,934 to
assist with the purchase of eight 40-foot coinpressed'natural gas buses for Sonoma
County Transit
39. Equipment Rental Agreement
Approve Equipment Rental Agreement with.Pourroy Transfer Service in the
amount of S25;000 and authorize the Chairman to execute agreement
40. Stony Point Road and East Napa Street Overlays
Award contract for construction to low bidder, Ghilotti Construction Company, in
the amount of$536,542.15 (CO2275 and C00003)
• -9-
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont'd) June 5;2001 •
•
TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORkS,(Cont'd) '
41. Adobe Union School Flashing Beacons
Resolution"accepting-construction as being complete and authorizing the
Chairman to execute a Notice of Completion for construction of Adobe Union
School;Flashing Beacons.on Adobe Road (Richard-A. Heaps Electrical
Contractor, Inc.) (CO2095)
42. Sale of Advertising on.Sonoma.County Transit Buses
Approve one-year option with,Transit.Ads to sell and display advertising media.
on Sonoma County Transitbuses for the period of July 1, 2001 through.June;30,
2002
43. Appropriation Transfer
Resolution authorizing appropriation transfer of$170,000 from Unanticipated
Revenuea(TDA funds) to Transit Division Article 4—Vehicle Maintenance
Service.($20,000), Article-4'—Gas/Oil ($140,000),.Article 8 —Administration
($4,000) and Article 8 —Gas/Oil ($6,000)
44. Bedega.Avenue Left-Turn Lanes at Lohrman and Eastman Lanes
Resolution authorizing appropriation ransfer of$10,059 from Eastman Lane •
Mitigation, $42,500 from Countywide Mitigation, and $18,252.from Donations
and Reimbursements to Contract Services within the Road fund (4'/5ths;vote
required)
Award contract:for construction to low bidder, Piazza Construction, in the amount
of$476,629.93 (CO2151)
45. Reconstruction and Widening of Sebastopol Road—Phase II
Approve First Amendment for Professional Services with Geologica(formerly
Newfields West) for environmentallgeotechnicalengineering services ($110,500)
46. Sonoma County Transit Coastal Route 29 Service
Approve resumption of•Sonoma County Transit Coastal Route'29 service on
weekends between July 7/8 and September 22/23, 2001
Approve future inclusion of summer.Route 29 in the annual Transit Division
budget at the summer 2001, service level
-10-
•
CONSENT CALENDAR(Cont'd) • June 5, 2001
TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLICWORKS (Cont'd)
47. Mendocino Transit Authority
Approve First Amendment to Agreement with Mendocino Transit Authority to
provide transit service in the northern coastal area between Point Arena and Santa
Rosa and authorize the Chairman to execute ($95,000)
48. River Road Guard Rails
Resolution authorizing an appropriation transfer of$224,000 from Unanticipated
Revenue—Countywide Traffic Mitigation funds.to Contract Services within the
Road fund (4/5thsvote required)
Award contract:for coristruction to low biddei-, Parnum Paving, Inc. in the amount
of$772,871.(CO2305/CO2315) (Held from 5/22/01)
•
49. Todd Road (#6807A)
Resolution introducing, reading title of and waiving further reading of an
Ordinance establishing parking restrictions on Todd Road
(Supervisorial District 5)
alIV. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES
SHERIFF/CORONER
50. Santa Rosa Junior College Dispatch Services Contract— Contract Extension
Authorize the Chairman to execute a contract extension and adjustment of annual
charge to provide;dispatch services to the Santa Rosa Junior College for a total of
$7,718 in revenue for FY 2001-02
•
51. Year 2001 Domestic Cannabis.Eradication/Suppression Program
Approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the"agreement with the Drug
Enforcement,Administration to provide$20,000 in Year 2001 Domestic Cannabis
Eradication/Suppression Program funds for,marijuana,suppression and eradication
activities to be performed by the Sonoma County Sheriff's Department
(Held from 5/22/01)
• -11-
CONSENT CALENDAR(Cont'd) June 5, 2001 •
I. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
52. California Arts Council Grant
Resolution approving the application and authorizing execution of a grant contract
with the California Arts Council
53. Appointment
Resolution appointin •YolandapRinaldo to the Human Rights Commission,
representing Supervisorial District 4
54. Eagle Scout
Resolution honoring George.Charles "Chuck" Cilley for achieving the rank of
Eagle Scout
55. Russian River Clean Up Day
Resolution proclaiming.September 22,2001 as Russian River Clean Up Day
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
56.. Agreement for Personal Services •
Authorize execution of agreement with Ben.Stone, Economic Development
Coordinator
57. Status Report
Transfers from Appropriations for Contingencies General Fund
58. Appropriation Transfer
Resolution authorizing budgetary adjustments to the 2000-01 Final Budget for the
Regional Parks Department and Appropriations for Contingencies in the amount
of$200 (4/5ths vote required)
59. Appropriation Transfer
Resolution authorizing budgetary adjustments to the 2000-01 Final Budget for the
Regional Parks Department and Permit and Resource Management Department
and Appropriations for Contingencies in the amount of$1;137 (4/5ths vote
required) (Held from 5/22/01)
-12-
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont'd). June 5, 2001
•
• COUNTY COUNSEL,
60. Legal Services Agreement in PG&E Bankruptcy Proceeding
Concurrent authorization to execute Legal;Services Agreement with Sulmeyer,
Kupetz, Baumann,&-Rothman for representation of County of Sonoma and
Sonoma County Water Agency in PG&E.bankruptcy proceeding for the
following:
Sonoma County Water Agency
'Board of Supervisors
Actions setting hearings and Bid:openings:
61. Set Time and Date:for Hearing of Appeal:ADA 01-0001, Bachmann/Kapolchok
Setting July 17, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. as the time and date'.for hearing of an appeal by
Stephen Bachmann and Jean Kapolchok of a Board of Zoning Adjustments
decision to,deny the request for an appeal of an,administrative determination;
property located at 5560 Sonoma Mountain Road, Santa Rosa; ADA 01-0001;
Supervisorial District.1
•
•
• -13-
•
•
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
• REGULAR CALENDAR
JUNE 5, 2001
III. DEVELOPMENT.SERVICES
AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
62. Declaration of"Agricultural Preservation and Open Space"Month
Resolution of the Board of Supervisors declaring themonth of June as
"Agricultural Preservation and Open Space"Month.
SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY
63. FY 2000-2001 Budget.Adjustments
Sonoma County Water Agency—Geyserville Sanitation Zone
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Water Agency
on behalf of the Geyserville Sanitation-Zone, authorizing budgetary
adjustment to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget for the Geyserville Sanitation
Zone Operations Fund
Occidental County'Sanitation District (CSD)
Resolution of the Board of Directors of Occidental CSD authorizing
budgetary adjustment to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget for the Occidental
CSD Operations Fund
South Park County Sanitation District
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the South Park CSD authorizing
budgetary adjustment to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget for the South Park
CSD Operations Fund
Sonoma County Water Agency(Non-Sanitation)
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the•Sonoma County Water.Agency
authorizing budgetary adjustment to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget for the
Sonoma County Water Agency Facilities Fund
• -14-
•
SPECIAL DISTRICTS (Cont'd) June 5, 2001
•REGULAR CALENDAR (Cont'd) -
SONOMA COUNTYWATER AGENCY (Cont'd)
63. FY 2000-2001 Budget Adjustments (Cont'd)
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Water Agency
authorizing budgetary adjustment to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget for the
Sonoma County Water Agency General Fund (4/5ths vote"required)
•
-15- •
•
•
. REGULAR'CALENDAR
BOARD OF'SUPERVISORS
JUNE 5, 2001
I:GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
•
HUMAN RESOURCES
64. Employee Suggestion Award
Resolution authorizing payment of$2,000 to"Ted.Nelson for his suggestion to
automate electronic payroll forms
CAO Recommends: Approval
III. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
• 65. First Place Award from the National Organization on Disability/United Parcel Service
Community Awards Competition
Resolutioniacceptingthe 2001 National Organization of Disability/United Parcel
Service Community Awards Competition First.Plac`e-award to the Community
Development Commission and Community Resources for Independence Housing
Access Modification (HAM) Program
CAO Recommends: Approval
• -16-
REGULAR CALENDAR(Cont'd) - June 15,2001
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD
66. 2001 High-Tech Sector Report
Accept the 2001 High-Tech Sector Report and NBTR Vision Statement Summary
Authorize the Economic Development Board to distribute the report to interested
parties
Resolution recognizing the leadership and contributions of Michael Troy in
technology development in Sonoma County
CAO Recommends: Approval
TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
67. Natural Gas Agreement with Enron Energy Services
Approve_agreement with Enron Energy Services, Inc., to provide natural gas to
Sonoma County Transit at a fixed-price of$0.791 per therm for the period of
April 1,'2001 through March 31, 2003,.and authorize the Transit Systems •
Manager to negotiate lower cost options with Enron during the period of
agreement, as appropriate
CAO Recommends: Approval
68. Adobe Road at Corona Road Intersection Widening and Signalization Project
Resolution approving the environmental documents and the project to'install new
signal lights and construction turn lanes at the intersection of Adobe Road and
Corona Road, east of-the city of Petaluma, and directing the filing of a Notice of
Determination
CAO Recommends: For policy determination of the Board
-17- •
REGULAR CALENDAR (Cont'd) June 5, 2001
• IV. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES
•
PROBATION
69. Crime Prevention Act of 2000
Resolution accepting grant funds in the amount of$1,590,067 from the Schiff-
Cardenas Crime:Prevention Act of 2000
Resolution amending.the:Depaitment Allocation.Listing to add 1.0 Probation
Officer III, 20Probation Officer II, 2.0 Probation Assistants and 1.0 Department
Analyst to AB 1913 Programs (043901)
Resolution transferring $1,168,614 in 2000/2001 ($31,437 salary/benefits and
$1,137,177 service/supplies) from UnanticipatedRevenues (4/5ths vote required)
Authorize and approve contracts with SAY ($125,922), Restorative Resources
($99,000) and with "R"House ($761,746) for the period June 5, 2001 through
June 30, 2002,to provide early intervention and aftercare services; and authorize
the Chief Probation Officer, on behalf of the'County, to sign any amendments or
extensions which do not significantly change the program content and are within
• approved budget authority
CAO Recommends: Approval
•
V. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
HEALTH SERVICES
70. AIDS Master Grant,Agreement Amendment
Authorize the Director of Health Services to sign and execute the Master Grant
Agreement #00-90106 A-1 with the State Department of Health Services and to
sign the Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) Amendment for HIV Testing HIV
00-49,Al, and LABG 00-49, Al under the Agreement ($1,524;499)
(July 1, 2000- June'30, 2001)
Resolution authorizing budgetary adjustment to the FY 2000-01 Final Budget
within the"General.Fund-Department of Health Services in the amount of$70,500
(4/5ths vote required)
• -18-
•
REGULAR CALENDAR (Cont'd) June 5, 2001
HEALTH SERVICES •
70. AIDS Master Grant Agreement Amendment (Cont'd)
Resolution amending the departmental allocation list, Department of Health
Services, adding net .25 FTE permanent positions
CAO Recommends: Approval
•
HUMAN SERVICES/HUMAN RESOURCES
. 71. Sonoma.County In-Home'Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority
Resolution.introducing Ordinance establishing the Sonoma County In-Home
Supportive.Services (IHSS) Public Authority
CAO Recommends: Approval
HUMAN`RESOURCES/HUMAN SERVICES
72. In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority
Employer-Employee Relations Policy
Resolution approving the IHSS Public Authority Employer-Employee Relations
Policy
CAO Recommends: Approval
-19- •
•
REGULAR CALENDAR (Cont'd) June 5, 2001
I. GENERALADMINISTRATIYE.SERVICES
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
73. Funding of Clover Drive Water Main Construction and Juvenile Hall Replacement
Resolution transferring $500,000 to Other General Government (Clover Drive)
and $1,653,481 to Juvenile Hall Replacement, from the Geothermal Tax
Litigation Fund balance (4/5ths vote required) (Held from 5/22/01)
CAO Recommends: Approval
III. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
REGIONAL PARKS
74. Repairs at Ives Park Pool
Approve the request from the City of Sebastopol to allocate $10,000 for repairs at
Ives Park Pool"(Held from 5/22/01)
CAO Recommends: For policy determination of the Board
-20-
•
•
PUBLIC POLICY FACILITATING COMMITTEE (PPFC)
Meeting Agenda
for
Friday, June 8, 2001
9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m:
at
Sonoma County Board of Supervisors' Chambers
575 Adrninistration Drive
Santa Rosa, California
1. Callao Order
2. Interim Report 5: Channel Maintenance (presentation by ENTRIX, Inc.)
Break •
3. Interim Report 6: Restoration;and Conservation Actions (presentation by
ENTRIX, Inc.)
4. Public comment
- 5. Establish next meeting agenda, location and time; and discuss meeting
date.
6. Adjourn
PPFC Committee Members:
• Tim Smith, Sonoma County Board of Supervisors (Chair)
• Michael Delbar; Mendocino County Board of Supervisors
• Paul:Kelley, Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
• Mike Reilly, Sonoma:County Board of Supervisors
• Patrick Rutten, National Marine Fisheries:Service
• Arijs Rakstins, U.S.-Army Corps of Engineers
▪ Cathy. Bleier, California Resources.Agency
• Lee Michiin, North Caast;Regional Water Quality Control Board
▪ Rick.:Rudick, Mendocino County Farm Bureau
• Lee Howard, Mendocino County'Russian River Flood Control &Water •'
Conservation Improvement District
•
•
• *,o,nOTrio o
� 0i0 RECEIVED
JUN 01 2001•
• • - NOTICE OF MEETING &.AGENDA G' MANAGER
Wednesday, June 6, 2001
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION•575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE, RM 104A•SANTA ROSA,CA 95403•(707)565-2577•FAX(707)565-3776
Time:2:00 p.m. Place: Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room (102A)
COMMISSIONERS ALTERNATE COMMISSIONERS STAFF
Michael.J. Cale,Chair Paul Kelley,Alternate Steven Sharpe, Executive Officer
Janet Condron Pamela Tartlet,Alternate David Woltering, LAFCO Staff
Tim Smith Jean A Kapolchok,Alternate David Hurst, Legal Counsel
Clark Thompson Dawn Mittleman,Alternate Jackie Wolf,Clerk
H. E. Boyett_
William Massey
Raymond A. Brunton
To speak on an item under discussion by the.Local Agency Formation Commission on this agenda,you may do so upon receiving recognition
from the Chair. Please step up to the rostrum,;,located.ln(the center of the room, and sign in State your name,for the record, before making
your presentation.All hearings are taped.Time limitations on public testimony may be imposed at the discretion of the Chair.
1. CALL TO ORDER BY THE CHAIR
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MEETING
4. GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
5. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT: NON-SPECIFIC MATTERS ONLY
6. REGULAR CALENDAR
6:1 •^ Consideration et FY 2004.2002,LAFCQ Final Budget and Revision of LAFCO Fee Schedule
• Action
Condron ;Thompson Massey Brunton _•
oyett _ .Smith Cale
�} ,Ayes:- r,Noes _- AbsentlAbstam -
6.2 Officer g Approve Understanding and Reappointmentiof Executive
.,LAFCO Staffin and•Faciliti,es: Memorandum of Un
Condron Thompson '^ • -,r Massey _. Brunton Boyett Smith Cale..
Ayes: Noes AbsenUAbstam:
7. INFORMATION I DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS
7.1 Selection of Chair for June 20, 2001 Meeting
8. CONFIRM MEETING.WEDNESDAY. JUNE 20, 2001: CANCELLATION OF JULY 4, 2001.MEETING
9. ADJOURNMENT
outlet
•
•
RECEIVED
•
"orrie!(1i >n L Ci01 JUN 01 2001
CITY MAMP:
• LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION ���
575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE, ROOM 104A,SANTA ROSA, CA 95403
(707) 565-2577 FAX (707) 565-3778
STEVEN J.SHARPE MICHAEL J.CALE
Executive Officer Chair
June 6, 2001
TO: Commissioners
FROM: Steven S. Sharpe, Executive Officer
SUBJECT: FY 2001-02 Final LAFCO Budget
Background
In accordance with the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Government Reorganization Act of 2000, the
Commission is required to approve a proposed budget and final budget each year On May 2,
2001, the Commission held•a.public hearing and considered and approved the Proposed FY
2001-02 LAFCO Budget. The Final FY 2001-02 LAFCO Budget is attached for your
consideration. There afeno changes,from the Proposed Budget. Staff recommends that the
Commission approve the Final Budget and fee schedule.
• In May, the Commission also directed staff to research the following:
1. Sentiment survey of cities and districts regarding a dependent or independent Sonoma
LAFCO.
2. Additional information regarding funding shares for each of the cities and special districts.
3. Information on "fee-for-service" cost recovery for LAFCO operations.
4. A cost estimate to prepare feasibility study for creating an independent Sonoma LAFCO.
Sentiment'Survey
On May 3, a survey was prepared and distributed to all cities and independent special districts in
the County seeking sentiment,regarding a dependent or independent Sonoma LAFCO. We
requested that the survey be returned-by June 1, 2001. In addition, Commissioner Thompson,
Alternate Commissioner Torliatt and I attended the Sonoma County Mayors' and
Councilmembers'Association on May 10 asking their comment on LAFCO's future.
At the time of this writing, several surveys have been returned. Most favor a continuation of
county staffing and facilities use. A final analysis will be prepared when the surveys are returned.
I highlighted the new LAFCO laws for the Mayors' and.Councilmembers' Association. Santa
Rosa indicated its support to continue county staffing. Rohnert Park recommended utilizing
independent counsel'rather than staff from the County'Counsel's Office. While I answered
• several questions, theme was little additional comment on a dependent LAFCO.
•
•
LAFCO Funding Allocations
•
I ant attaching a table indicating LAFCO funding allocations for each city and independent
special district. The table shows proposed LAFCO FY 2001-02 costs and its distribution among
•
funding agencies:Unless the Commission adjusts the proposed budget,this will be the'basis of
bills sent"to'funding agencies by July 1, 2001.
Fee Revenues
For FY 2001-02, LAFCO will receive a portion of.its revenues from filing.fees. In prior years
this was LAFCO's only"significant source of revenue. We project $32,000:in fee revenues from
20 proposals, which ff sets approximately ma-tely 1 GfLAFCO'stotal operating:Costs ($180,223).
This is consistent with prior years where-fees represented:15% to 25% of our actual operating
costs. Filing fees are based.on LAFCO's adopted fee schedule. It is my understanding that a.time
study was done.some tune ago to determine an appropriate fee structure and schedule..Fees are
determined based on size and complexity of the proposal, as well as type of environmental
documentation. The current fee schedule has been increased only for cost-of-living adjustments
each year.
Staff is currently,studying:other cost/fee methodologies, including fee-for-service, which may
result in a more significant cost recoveryfor,LAFCO operating costs. As cost recovery has
become a significant issue for LAFCOs'as.a result of the new laws, A fee-for-service system
means that fee revenues can recover all operating costs. Alternative methods we are studying
include establishing a fee schedule based on a specific cost recovery goal (i.e. 50%) that would
be set by the Commission. Fee methodologies include simple application flat fees, hourly rates or
combinations. Some methods may require extensive time tracking and billing systems.
•
Based on a fee-for-service.system, LAFCO would have to receive fee revenues equal to its
operating costs, projected to be $180,223 The average cost for each application-Would be
approximately $9,000. In addition to extraordinary application costs,this system also poses
difficulties for the budget process because it is dependent on the number of applications.
Proposals vary froriiyear to year usually ranging from 12 to 25 applications. A great deal of the
work that LAFCO staff does is not recoverable by fees,such as public information,
administration, agency facilitation and meetings.
LAFCO staff recommends•that the.Commission determine a cost recovery goal and direct us to
study and make recommendations on an appropriate fee system. It:is further recommended that
•
this study betcompletedprior to preparation of the FY 2002-03 LAFCO Budget.
Relocation Feasibility-Study
A.feasibility study to relocate the LAFCO office is estimated to,cost between $6,000 and $8,000.
This study includes analysis of space-needs for personnel and equipment. In addition it would
include an evaluation,of current available office spaces in the area There are sufficient funds in
the FY 2001-02 LAFCO Budget for the study.
Attachments •
Budget
Resolutions
MOU
2
BUDGET SUMMARP
• Local Agency_tortnation Commission
Executive:Officer:Steven Sharpe
• Index:788018
.Special Fund:,'80008000
A. Program Description: The Local Agency Formation.Commission (LAFCO) is an independent agency established by State
law. The Commission is responsible for reviewing, approving;'or disapproving changes in organization to cities and special
districts including annexations, detachments, formations and incorporations. The seven-member commission is composed of
representatives from the City Councils, the Board of Supervisors., independenrspecial districts and the public. The Commission
contacts with the County, by Memorandum of Understanding (MOLT)for facilities, equipment and staffing. By the MOU,
County Counsel provides legal services. The LAFCO budget is contained in a.:special fund
B. Financial Summary:
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES NET COST/USE OF FUND BALANCE
FY 00-01 FY 01-02 % FY 00-01 FY 01-02
• Btidaet Division/Fund Adopted Recommended Change Adopted Recommended Chance
LAFCO-General Fund • 163,732 0 100:0 132.232 0 100.0
LAFCO -Special Fund .0 180.773 100.0. 0 0 100.0
•
TOTAL FINANCIAL 163:732 180,223 10.1 132,832 0 (100.0)
C. Cost Distribution
• SOURCES OF FINANCING
FY 00-01 Try 01-02
FY 01-02 Cost Distribution • .Adopted Recommended Change
County Share 132,832 49,408 (62.8)
. City Share 0 49:408 100.0
IndependentDistrict Share 0 49,407 100.0
User Fee '30,900 32,000 3.6
Other Revenues 0 0 0.0
TOTAL FINANCING 163,732 180.223 10.1 •
D. Summary of Positions:
• STAFFING SUMMARY
FY 00-01 FY 01-02
Staffing Adopted Reconiniended Change
•
Permanent Positions 2.00 1.15 (42.5)
Extra Help 0.00 0.00 0.0
Overtime 0.00 0.00 0.0
TOTAL POSITIONS 2.00 1.15 (42.5)
•
• i
1 •
E.Workload
WORKLOAD SUMMARY
FY 00-01 FY 01-02 %Change
• Adopted Recommended From Adopted
Proposals (Total)` 20 20 0.0 •
Formations 2 2 0.0
Sphere Adoptions 2 2 0.0
Sphere Amendments 5 5 0.0
Complex Proposals 5 5 0.0
F. Summary of Significant Changes
• Beginning FY 01-02, in accordance with the Conese-Knox-Hertzberg LocalGovemment Reorganization Act of 2000, LAFCO
must approve its own budget. The Commission must annually adopt a proposed budget by May 15, and a final budget by June 15,
of each year. The budget must be at least equal to the budget adopted for the previous fiscal year unless the commission fords mat
reduced staffing or program costs will still allow the LAFCO to fulfill the purposes and requirements of the Act.
• The County,the cities and independent special districts will share LAFCO funding, each paying 1/3 of the cost not covered by
user fees and other revenues. Each city's and districts funding allocation is determined by annual revenues reported to the state
controller. The county auditor will preparelanu' send bills to Board of Supervisors, cities and districts after July 1 for their share of
LAFCO costs.
At the end of the fiscal year, if the Commission finds that it has a fund balance, it may retain those funds to offset costs in the
following fiscal year's budget: If during the fiscal year, the Commission does not have sufficient funds to operate, the Board of
Supervisors may loan the,Commission funds•and recover those funds in the Commission's budget for the following fiscal year.
• For FY 01-02 LAFCO proposes to,continue its MOU with the County for;3 part-time employees in the County Administrator's
•
Office. Total FTEs.are 1.15 consisting of.15 FIT Administrative Analyst III (Executive Officer); .5 FIE Administrative Analyst
II (Assistant Executive Officer)-and 5 FTE:Secretary. By the MOD,the County Counsel will provide legal services. LAFCO will
also continue to contract with the County for-facilities, including offices and meeting room, and equipment.
• Expenditures for FY 01-02 are projected to be S180,223 representing an 10.1% increase from FY 00-01. Revenues generated
from application filing fees are estimated to be 232,000,ah increase.of 3%from FY.00-01.
• Expenditures are divided into 2 categories: Salaries and Benefits and Services and Supplies. Salaries and Benefits represents a
decrease of 526.007(28%)primarily due to reduced staffing from.FY 00-01. Services'and Supplies are increasing 542,498 (92%)
primarily as a result of County costs:associated with facilities, equipment, County Auditor services, employee recruitment and
legal support. The County Auditor L projecting a 515,000 cost for the billing and collection process in FY 01-02.Legal costs are
projected to be 230 000. Reductions are anticipated next year as some of these costs are for start up and policy development.
associated with.the,new law.
• Revenue projections includea 4%COLA filing fee increase.Revenue projections-.assume that the following mix of proposals will
be submitted in FY.01-02:20 applications including 5 complex reorganizations, 2 district formations, 2 sphere of influence
adoptions, and,5 sphere of influence amendments. Revenues do not reflect proposals for the consolidation of fire protection
districts as the.commission supports such proposals by waving filing fees.
• .
2
ORCAIrZATIONAL CHART
SONOMA L;OC_4L,AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
•
SONOIvLA LOCAL AGENCY .
• FORMATION COMMISSION
(LAFCO)
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Administrative Analyst RJ;(.15 FTE)
ASSISTANT STANT Er CUTIVE OFFICER EI
Administrative Analyst II (:5 FTE)
COMMISSION CLERKIL AFCO SECRETARY.(.5 FTE).
•
•
•
•
•
•
3
• FY 01-02 LAFCO Proposed Budget
Dept.70
• Div. 88 •
Section 01
Index 788018
Fund 80008000
FY 01.702 Total increase/(De
Sub-object, Title FY 00=01 Budget Budget:Request crease) %
5100 Positions $77,397 $61,552 ($15,845) -20%
5130 Commissioners $6,079 $6,079 $0 0%
5210 Retirement $11,579 $7,785 ($3,894) -33%
5220 FICA $7,753 $5,074 ' ($2,679) -35%
5300 Health Ins , $1 1,296 $2•504 ($3,792) -34%
5310Disabl. $1,236 $666 ($570) -46%
5320 Dental $1,190 $792 ($398) -33%
53.,- Life Ins. 278 $45 ($233) -54%
5340 Vision.Ins. $406 $229 ($177) -44%
5400 Wk Comp $1,378 $1;971 $593 43%
5907 Salary Savings (3988) $0 $988 -100%
TOTAL SAL& BEN $117,704 $91,697 ($26007) -22%
6040 Communications $1,250 $1,250 $0 0%
• 6103 Lability Ins. $135 $69 ($66) -49%
6140 Maintenance $50 $50. 50 0%
6280 Memberships $650 $1;300 $650 100%
5400 Office Expenses $6,500 $6,500 $0 0%
6410 Postage $950 $1;500 $550 ' 58%
6430 Printing Services $250 $500 $250 100%
6500 Professional-Services $31,093 $15;000 ($16,093) -52%
6521 County Services $0 $11,307 $11,307 0%
6630 County Auditor Servic $0 $15,000 $15,000 0%
6642 Legal Counsel $0 $30,000 530,000 0%
6800 Legal Noticing $1,100 '$1„100 50 0%
7301 County Car $100 $200 $100 100%
7302 Travel $3,200 $4,000. $800 25%
7303 Private Car $750. $750 ' $0 0%
TOTAL SERV.AND SUPT. $466,028 $88,526 $42,498 92%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $163,732 $180,223 $16,491 10%
•
3141' Fee Revenues $30,900 •$32,000 $1,100 C%
2901 County $132,832 $49,408 ($83,424) -169%
2910 Cities $0 $49,408 549,408 100%
2930 District $0 $49,407 $49,407 100%
TOTAL REVENUES $163,732 $180,223 $16,491 9%
• NET COST $0 $0 $0 0%
•
•
•
Resolution No.
• 575 Administration Drive
Santa Rosa, California
June 6, 2001
RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE
COUNTY OF SONOMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION'S FISCAL YEAR 200.1-2002 FINAL
BUDGET AND FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the Sonoma Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) has
reviewed the budget prepared by the LAFCO staff; and
WHEREAS, the Commission is required by law to approve a,proposed and final
budget, and
WHEREAS, on May 2, 2001 the Commission approved the FY 01-02 Proposed
LAFCO Budget and Fee Schedule increase of 4%, and
WHEREAS, the LAFCO budget is not a project pursuant to the requirements of the
California Environmental'Quality Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
• Sonoma DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,.DETERMINE AND ORDER approval of the LAFCO
budget for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 and Fee Schedule.
The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of this Local Agency
Formation Commission on the sixth day of June, 2001, and ordered adopted by the following
vote:
Commissioners:
Ayes: Noes: Absent or not voting:
WHEREUPON; the Chairman declared the foregoing resolution adopted, and
SO ORDERED
ATTEST:
Steven J. Sharpe, Executive Officer
The within instrument is a correct copy of the original on file in this office.
API EST:
•
BY. , Clerk
• t"
•
"LAFCO" Allocation.of•2001-02 LAFCO costs to agencies
1997-98
SCO Rpt Total Allocation Allocation
• Page# Description Revenues Factors 148,223
COQ
•
County General Fund N/A 0.33334 49,408
Total County 0 0.33334 49,408
CITIES
22 .Cloverdale 3,874,217 0.00408 605
28 Cotati 5,186,546 0.00547 810
50 Healdsburg 23,003,737 0.02425 3,594'
386 Petaluma • 49,047;404 0.05170 7,664 .
308 Rohnert Park 32,700,969 0:03447 5,109
462 Santa Rosa 172;121,126 0'18144 26,896
104 Sebastopol 6,504,378 0.00686 1,016
106 Sonoma 8,450,157 0.00891 1,320
230 Windsor 15,319,270 0.01615 2,394
Total Cities 316;207,804 0:33333. 49,408
Ambulance Service:
144 Russian River Fire" 260,567 0.00157 233
144 Cloverdale Health Care 321,346 0.00193 287
Subtotal 581,913 0.00350 520
Cemetery:
164 Green Valley 4;578 0:00003 4
164 Shiloh 170,352 0.00103 152
Subtotal 174,930 . 0.00105 156
Fire Protection:
228 Cazadero CSD* 57,063 0:00034 51
228 Occidental CSD' 163,476 0..00098 146
228 Bennett Valley 280,974 0.00169 '251
228 Bodega Bay 741,275 0.00446 662
229 Cloverdale 841,077 0.00506 751
229 .Rancho Adobe 9,546,130 0.00931 1,380
229 Forestville 494,785 0.00298 442
229 .Glen Ellen 307,799 0.00185 275
229 Graton 285,477 0.00172 255 •
229 Russian River* 601,164 0.00362 536
229 Kenwood 299,530 0.00180 267
229 Monte Rio 183,881 0.00111 164 _
229 . Rincon Valley 1,863,659 0.01122 1,663
229 Roseland 562,298 0.00339 502
•
229 Schell-Vista 303,763 0.00183 271
229 Gold Ridge 798,207 0.00481 712
229 Valley of the Moon 1,560,204 0.00939 1,392
• 230 Windsor 1,480,558 0.00891 1,321
Subtotal 12,371,320 0.07448 11,041
Health:
246 Petaluma Health Care 4,225,477 0.02544 3,771
• Subtotal 4,225,477 0.02544 3771
1997-98 .
SCO Rpt Total Allocation Allocation •
Page# Description .Revenues ;Factors 148,223
•
Library Services:
302 Cazadero CSD* 4,549 0.00003 4
302 Occidental CSD* 9;287 0:00006 8
Subtotal 13;836 0.00008 12
Pest Control
323 Marin/Sonoma Mosq &Vect 1;672;684• 0:01007 1,493
Subtotal ... 1;672;684 0:01007 1,493
Recreation & Park:
353 Cazadero CSD' 32,141 0.00019 29
354 Occidental CSD* 3,926 0.00002 4
354 Camp Meeker* 80,229 0.00048 72
354 Del Rio Woods 31,859. 0.00019 28
354 Monte Rio 149,028 0.00090. 13&
. 354 Russian River ' 149,433 0.00090 133
Subtotal 446,616 0.00269 399
.Soil Conservation:
366 Gold Ridge RCD 32,184 0.00019 29
366 Sotoyome,RCD 301,212 0.00181 269
366 Southern So Co.RCD 359,279 0.00216. 321
Subtotal 692,675 0.00417 619 •
Waste Disposal: •
666 Bodega Bay PUD* - 584,788 0.00352 522
Subtotal 584,788 0.00352 522
Water lJtility.,
744 Occidental CSD* 80,910 0.00049 72
744 Camp Meeker Rec& Park* 38,180 0.00023 34
744 Bodega Bay PUD* 599,089 0.00361 535 .
., 745 Notth.BayWater 1,378 0.00001 1
745 Forestville Water 423,764 0.00255 378
745 Russian River Water 283,342 0.00171 253
745 Sonoma Mtn Water 37,957 0:00023 34
745 Sweetwater Springs Water • 2,117,429 0.01275 1,890
745 Timber Cove'Water 127,100 0.00077 113
745 Valley of the Moon Water .2,775,789 0:01671 2,477
Subtotal 6,484,938 0.03904 5;787
Hospital:
765 Sonoma Vly Health Care 28,114,893' 0.16927 25,087
Subtotal 28,114,893 0.16927 25,087
Total Independent Dists' 55,364,070 0' 49,407
•
GRAND TOTALS 371,571.874 1.00000 148.223 1111,
* District revenues are reported ip rnultiple'.categories. Allocation amounts
should be consolidated before billing.
PROPOSED FY 2001-2002 SONOMA LAFCO FEE SCHEDULEI
Present Proposed 4%
•. Proposals involvint annexation, detachment or combination thereof: Fee Increase Fee
Less than 10.acres, with 100% landowner/voter consent $ 1,263 1.314
•
Less than 10 acres, without 100% landowner/voter consent 1;674 1,741
1.0 to 50 acres 2,094 2,178
50 acres or more 2,512 2,612
2. Sphere of influence updates or amendments:
Concurrent with an annexation; detachment or combination thereof: 558 580
Without a previously prepared Initial Study: 2,657 2,758
With a previously prepared Initial Study: 1,955 2,033
3. Charges for review of environmental document accompanvingproposal:
Categorically exempt • 139 145
Initial Study and Negative Declaration 279 290
Initial Study and Mitigated,Negative Declaration 838 872
Initial Study and Environmental Impact Report 1,955 2,033
Initial Study only2 698 726
• None (Not categorically exempt)2 1,396 1,452
4. Proposals involving district formation:
Without a previously prepared Initial Study: • 3,351 3,485
With a previously prepared Initial Study: 2.512 2,612
5. Proposals involving incorporation: 4,187 4,354
6. Request for reconsideration: 1,674 1,741
7. Out-of-Agency Agreements/Contracts (GSA's) 139 145
1 The Commission may waive or alter fees in special circumstances. A proposal previously denied and
resubmitted shall be accompanied by new fees unless changes are determined to be minor. Fees are due with
application submittal. An application shall not be deemed filed unless accompanied by the appropriate fees.
2 Exclusive of charges for preparing•an Environmental Impact Report, in the event LAFCO requires an EIR as
lead agency under CEQA.
6-01
•
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE,ROOM 104A SANTA'ROSA, CA 95403
(707) 565-2577 FAX (707) 565-3778
STEVEN J.SHARPE MICHAEL J.CALE
Executive Officer Chairman
June 6, 2001
TO: LAFCO Commissioners
FROM: Steven J. Sharpe, Executive Officer
SUBJECT: LAFCO Staffing and Facilities; Memorandum of Understanding and
Reappointment of.Executive Officer
The MOU with the County for LAFCO staff, counsel and office space expires at the end
of June 30, 2001. In,addition, Steve Sharpe's appointment as the Commission's
Executive Office expires on that date. The LAFCO 200f=02 Budget continues the
contract with the County for thei:fiscal year. It is also recommended that Steve Sharpe
• continue as Executive Officer. Resolutions are attached.
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM OFUNDERSTANDING
• FOR PROFESSIONAL AND CLERICAL STAFFING, OFFICE SPACE,
EQUIPMENT,SUPPLIES, AND LEGAL SERVICES FOR THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA
FOR FISCAL YEAR-2001-2002
This Memorandum of Understanding (Agreement) is made by and between the
Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Sonoma (the Commission) and
the County of Sonoma.(the County).
RECITALS
WHEREAS,the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985
(the Old Act) has been reorganized, amended, and redesignated as the Cortese-Knox-
Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (the New Act); and
WHEREAS, under the Old Act, the Sonoma County Administrator (the County
Administrator) acted as executive officer for the Commission and provided the
Commission with professional and clerical staff support, office space, equipment, and
supplies. and the Sonoma County Counsel (the County Counsel) acted as legal counsel
• .
for the Commission and provided the Commission with legal services; and
WHEREAS, the New Act requires the Commission to appoint an executive
officer, legal counsel, and such other staff as it deems appropriate, and to make its own
provision for necessary quarters, equipment, and supplies; and
WHEREAS, the New Act allows the Commission to contract with another public
agency for personnel and facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Commission desires to comply with the New Act's requirements
for fiscal year 200 1 2002by'continuing to receive professional and clerical staff support,
office space, equipment, and supplies from the County Administrator, and legal services
from the County Counsel; and
WHEREAS, the County is willing to have the County Administrator provide
professional and clerical staff support, office space, equipment, and supplies, and the
County Counsel provide legal services to the Commission for Fiscal Year 2001-2002; and
WHEREAS, the Commission and the County desire to establish an understanding
• regarding.the County Administrator providing professional and clerical staff support,
1
office space, equipment, and supplies, and the County Counsel providing legal services to •
the.Commission for Fiscal Year 2001-2002;
•
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Commission and the County agree as follows:
1. The County Administrator shall provide professional and clerical staff for
the day-to-day operations of the Commission. Professional staff shall
include the Executive Officer (.15 F l L) and Assistant Executive Officer (.5
FTE). Clerical staff shall include a:Secretary (.5 FTE). The Executive
Officer shall be Steven Sharpe. The Assistant Executive Officer shall be an
Administrative Analyst II/1IT: The cost for professional'and clerical staff
for the Commission shall be funded by appropriations within the
Commission's 2001-2002 budget.
2. The County Counsel shall provide legal services to the Commission.. The
cost for legal services for the Commission shall be funded by appropriations
within the Commission's 2001-2002 budget.
3. The County Administrator shall provide the Commission's staff with office •'
space and all necessary equipment and supplies. The cost for office space,
equipment, and supplies for the Commission shall be funded by
appropriations within the Commission's 2001-2002 budget.
4. The primary responsibility of the Assistant.Executive Officer shall be to
perform duties required by the•Act. It is anticipated that 100% of the
Assistant Executive=Officer's;time will be devoted to duties directly or
indirectly related to the Commission.
5. The,Assistant Executive Officer<and clerical staff for the Commission.,shall
be supervised by the Executive Officer.
6.. This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2001, and shall continue in
full force and effect until June 30, 2001.
7. Any and all persons identified in this Agreement or any exhibit,hereto as
the Executive Officer, Legal Counsel, or other professional performing
services under this.Agreement are deemed by the Commission to be key
personnel whose services were a material inducement to the Commission to •
• ent er into this Agreement, and withoutwhose services the Commission
would not have entered into this Agreement. The County shall not remove,
replace, substitute, or'othenvi'se cliange any key personnel without the prior
written consent of the Commission.
8. This Agreement is intended both as the final expression of the agreement
between the parties hereto with respect to the included terms and as a
complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement pursuant to
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1856. No modification of this Agreement
shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a
writing signed by both parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
set forth below.
COMMISSION:
Sonoma Local Agency Formation Commission
DATED: By:
Chair, Sonoma Local Agency Formation
Commission
ATTEST:
Steven J. Sharpe, Executive Officer
COUNTY:
County of Sonoma
DATED: By:
Chair, Board of Supervisors
•
2
ATTEST:
•
EEVE T. LEWIS, County Clerk and
ex-officio Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:
DATED: By:
County Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DATED: By:
Deputy County Counsel •.
•
4
Resolution No.
•
•_ 575 Administration Drive
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
Date
RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE
COUNTY OF SONOMA,,STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING AN EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND LEGAL COUNSEL, AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR TO EXECUTE
A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE COUNTY OF SONOMA FOR
PROFESSIONAL AND CLERICAL STAFFING, OFFICE-SPACE, EQUIPMENT,
SUPPLIES,AND LEGAL SERVICES"FOR"THE COMMISSION FOR FISCAL YEAR
2001-2002
RESOLVED, by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Sonoma(the
Commission), that:
WHEREAS,the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (the Old Act)
has been reorganized,amended,and redesignated as the'Cortese-Knox-HertzbergLocal Government
Reorganization Act of 2000"(the New Act); and
• WHEREAS, under the Old Act, the Sonoma County Admihistrator (the County
Administrator) acted as executive;officer for the Commission and provided the Commission with
professional and clerical staff support, office space, equipment, and supplies, and the Sonoma
County Counsel (the County Counsel)acted as legal counsel for the Commission and provided the
Commission with legal services; and
WHEREAS,the New Act requires the Commission to appoint an executive officer, legal
counsel, and such other staff as it deems appropriate, and to make,its own provision for necessary
quarters, equipment, and supplies; and
WHEREAS;the New Act allows the Commission to contract with another public agency
for personnel and facilities; and
WHEREAS,the Commission desires to comply with'the New Act's requirements for fiscal
year 2001-2002 by continuing to receive professional and clerical staff support, office space,
equipment, and supplies from the County Administrator, and legal services from the County
Counsel; and
WHEREAS, Coniinission desires to appoint Steven J. Sharpe from the County
Administrator's staff as Executive Officer and the County Counsel as Legal Counsel for the
• Commission for Fiscal Year 2001-2002; and
WHEREAS, the Commission and the County of Sonoma (the County) desire to establish
an understanding regarding the County Administrator providing professional and clerical staff
support;office space,equipment, and supplies, and the County Counsel providing legal services to
the Commission for Fiscal Year 2001-2002;
NOW, THEREFORE,the Commission hereby appoints Steven J. Sharpe as its Executive
Officer and the County Counsel as its Legal Counsel for Fiscal Year 2001-2002,and authorizes the
Chair.'to execute amemorandum of understanding with the County for professional and clerical
staffing, office space, equipment, supplies, and legal services for the Commission for Fiscal Year
2001-2002, a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Commission.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION. was introduced at a regular meeting of the
Commission on the day of 2001, and adopted by the following vote:
COMMISSIONERS:
AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT
WHEREUPON, the Chair declared the foregoing resolution duly adopted; and
SO ORDERED.
ATTEST: •
Steven I Sharpe, Executive Officer
ATTEST:
BY:
Clerk •
•
2 •