HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 13 06/18/2001 tea
Lc o (l1 ��- c!
•
R f .
Government Code Section 56700.1 requires expenditures for political•purpose's related to •
a change of organization or reorganization proposal that has been submitted to the
Commission and contributions in support or opposition to those measures, shall be
disclosed and.reported in the same manner as'for local,initiative measures to be presented
to the:voters. It is important to note that since local initiative disclosures are not presently
filed'with LAFCO, the information concerning LAFCO proposals would also, bypass the
Commission's inspection unless there are specific.LAFCO policies requiring such filings.
The filing requirements are currently expressed in the Political Reform Actof 1974, 81000
et seq. and responsibility of the Fair Political Practices Commission:(FFPC). The rules
and requirements regarding:committeescformedito support or oppose state and local (and
now, LAFCO) ballot measures are contained in FPPC Information Manual D and the 2000
Addendum to the manual. If the Commission approves the policy, LAFCO application
forms will be revised to reflect the new disclosure requirements. Copies of any filings of any
contribution/expenditure reports required by Section 56700.1 shall be also be filed-with
LAFCO.
RECOMMENDATION: •
Staff recommends that theCommissionapprove the amendment to its Rules of Procedure
to:
1 . Require the disclosure ofexpenditures:for political purposes'related'to a change of •
organization or reorganization proposal that has been submittedi.to4thi e Commission
and contributions in support of oropposition to those measures.A copy of filings of
any contribution/expenditurereports required by Section 56700.1 shall also b'e filed
with LAFCO;'and
2. Direct staff to include a staternent of the new mandatory requirements of .56700.1
'in the LAFCO application.forni.
n
Attachment "A"
• Rules of Procedure No. 35
Expenditures and Contributions in Support of orin Opposition to an Organization
or Reorganization.
Statement will also be attached to..LAFCO application
"Pursuant to Government Code Sections 56700.1 and 81'000 et seq.,and Sonoma Local
Agency Formation Commission Rules of Procedure, any person or combination of persons
who directly or indirectly contribute $1000 or more or expend $1000 or more in support of
or in opposition to a change of organization or reorganization that has been submitted to
the Commission and will require an election must comply with the reporting and disclosure
requirements of the Political Reform Act of 1974. and the:Sonoma'Local Agency Formation
Commission. These requirements contain provisions for making disclosures at specified
intervals. A copy of filing of any contribution/expenditure as required by Section 56700.1
shat! also be filed with the LAFCC."
•
•
•
3
•
• Resolution No.
575 Administration Drive
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
May 2, 2001
RESOLUTION OF THE SONOMA,LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION.COMMISSION AMENDING ITS
RULES OF PROCEDURE ADDING SECTION 35:EXPENDITURES.AND CONTRIBUTIONS IN
SUPPORT'OF'OR IN OPPOSITION TO AN ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 2, 2001 in compliance with Government Code
Section 56300(b) to consider the adoption of p
policies and P procedures for the disclosure of
contributions and> expenditures en"ditures in support of and opposition to proposals before Sonoma LAFCO;
and
WHEREAS, this Commission hereby determines that the public would benefit from the
disclosure of funds raised and expended by persons to support and oppose applications for
reorganizations and changes of organization under review by this Commission pursuant to the
Cortese-Knox Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act' of 2000. The'Commission also
determines that these disclosures_can occur in a manner that does not infringe on the rights of
citizens to petition their governments.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Sonoma Local Agency Formation
Commission hereby adopts the policies and procedures as contained in Exhibit A, Policies ana,.
Procedures for the Disclosure of Contributions and Expenditures in Support of and Opposition to
Proposals. '
The foregoing ,resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of this Local Agency Formation
Commission on'the second day of May, 2001, and ordered adopted by the following'vote:
Commissioners: Condron: Thompson: Smith: Massey:
Brunton: Boyett: Cale:
Ayes: Noes: Absent or not doting:
WHEREUPON, the Chairman declared the foregoing resolution adopted'and
SO ORDERED
ATTEST:
Steven J. Sharpe; Executive Officer
The within instrument is a correct copy of the original on file in this office.
ATTEST: •'
BY:
Clerk
•
•
••0110 Iillh L° a 0 ?E 1 EL
APR g 0 2001 `
• . LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE,ROOM 104A, SANTA.ROSA, CA 95403 CITY MANAGER
(707) 527-2577 FAX (707)'527-3778
STEVEN J.SHARPE MICHAEL J.CALE
Assistant Executive Officer Chairman
en
� r
j
May 2, 2001 ,0 Li n c
orTh a ion
TO: LAFCO Commission •
FROM: Steven J. Sharpe, Executive Officer
SUBJECT: Proposed LAFCO 2001-2002 Budget
Background
The purpose of this memorandum is to describe the proposed Sonoma LAFCO budget ,.
and fee increases for the fiscal year (FY) 01-02 for approval by the Commission.
Beginning FY 01-02,.in,accordance with the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local
Government Reorganization Act of 2000. LAFCO must approve its own budget. The
Commission must annually, after public hearing, adopt a proposed budget by May I
and a.final budget by June 15, of each year. The budget-must be at least equal to the
• budget adopted for the previbUs fiscal year unless the commission finds that reduced
staffing or program costs will still allow- the LAFCO to fulfill the purposes and
requirements of the Act. The proposed budget is attached.'In preparation for this
hearing, the proposed budget was sent to all cities and independent special districts in
the County.
The County, the cities and independent_ special districts will share LAFCO funding,
each paving 1/3 of the cost-not covered by user fees;and other revenues. Previously,
the County funded LAFCO's,budget. Each city's and district's funding allocation is
determined by annual revenues reported to the State Controller. The County Auditor ,
will prepare and send bills to Board of Supervisors, cities and districts after July 1 for
their share of LAFCO costs.
At the end of the fiscal year, if the Cos* ission.finds that it has a fund balance, it may
retain those'funds'to offset costs in the following fiscal year's budget. If during the
fiscal year, the Commission does not have sufficient funds to operate, the Board of
Supervisors may loan the Commission funds and recover those funds in the
Commission's budget for the following fiscal year
The Commission contracts with the County, by Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
for facilities, equipment.and staffing. Also, by the MOU, County Counsel provides legal
services. The MOU expires at the end of this FY (6/30/01). The. LAFCO budget is
contained in a special.fund. .
• For FY 01-02, LAFCO proposes to continue its MOU with the County for 3 part-time
employees in the County Administrator's Office. Total FTEs are 1.15 consisting of .1.5
•
F"IE.AdministrativeAnalyst III (Executive Officer); .5 FTE Administrative.Analyst II •
(Assistant Executive Officer) and..5'FTE Secretary. By the MOU, the County Counsel
will provide legal services. LAFCO will also continue to contract with the County for
facilities, including offices and meeting Mom, and equipment.
Summary of Significant Changes
Expenditures for FY 01702 are projected to be„$180,223 representing a 10.1% increase
from FY 00-01. Revenues generated from application filing fees are estimated to be
$32,000, an increase of 3.6°/0 from FY 00-01.
FINANCING/REVENUES
Cost Distribution FY_00=01 FY 01-02. % Change
County Share 132,832 49,408 (62.8)
Cities Share 0 49,408 100.0
Districts;Share 0 44,407 100:0
User Fees' - 30,900 32,000 3.6
Other Revs. 0 0 0
Total Financing/Revenues .163.732 . 180.223 .10'.1
Revenue projections include a 4% COLA filing fee increase. Revenue projections •
assume that the following mix of proposals will be submitted in FY 01-02: 20
applications including 5 complex reorganizations,2 district fo Lu.auons, 2 sphere of
influence adoptions, and 5 sphere:of'inftuence amendments. Revenues do not reflect
proposals for the consolidation of fire protection districts as the commission supports
such proposals by waving filing fees.
EXPENDITURES
Category FY•00-0. FY 01=02 % Change.
Salaries and Benefits 117,704 91,697 (22:0)
Services and Supplies 46,028 88,526 92.0-
Total.Expenditures , 1 63.732 180.223 9_0
E.xpendittires are divided into 2 categories: Salaries:andBenefits and Services and
Supplies'. Salaries and Benefits represents a decrease of$26,007 (28%) primarily due
to reduced staffing from FY” 00-01. .Services and Supplies are;increasing$42,498
(92%) primarily'as,a result of County costs associated with facilities, equipment,
County Auditor services, employee.recnhitrnent ana legal support. The County Auditor
is projectinga $15,000 cost for the billing-and collection process in FY 01-02. Legal
costs are projected to be $30,000. Reductions are anticipated next+year as some of
these costs are for start-up and policy development associated with the"new law, Other
County-support'„including costs.for once space, equipment, records management, •
energy, building maintenance, computer maintenance and personnel services total
$11,307.
2
• RECOMMENDATION
The Commission is required to conduct a public hearing on the-proposed and final
budget. After its hearing, staff recommends that the Commission adopt the proposed
LAFCO budget for FY 2001=02, including COLA.fee increases, and direct preparation
of the final budget. The final.budget will be presented to the Commission,on June 6,
2001.
Attachments
•
•
•
•
•
3
•
BUDGET SUMMARY
Local Agency Formation Con•imissioin
E ecutive Officer:Steven Sharpe
Index: 768018
Special.Fund: 8 000 8000
A. Program Description: The Local Agency Formation Commission (LkF.CO) is an independent agency established by Sane
raw. Toe Commission is•responsible for re rewires, approving, or disarproving changes in organmzatioii co cities and special
districts including annexations, detachments: r"orrnanons and incorporations. The se ven member°commission is composed of
representatives from the City Councils, the Board'of=Supervisors; independent special districts ana me public. The Comr.,ission
contacts with the County, by Memorandum of,Una -standing (MO ) or facilities, equipment and;sca rmm. By the MOLD,
County Counserprovides !egalservices. Toe LA.FCObudge:is contained in a special_und
B. Financial Summary:
F?■ aNCIAL SUMM:.RY
TOTAL 7'C"OND117RFS NET COSTRUF OF FTINDBAT ANCE
FY 00.01 FY 01-01 m;, FY 00-01 FY 01-02 °^
Blade°7 Divisions?und Adored Recommended C rae A donted- Recommended Change
L.;.FCO -General Fund 163;72 0 100.0 1"2.8;2` 0 100.0
LA CO -Special-Fund .0 1R0,,-; 100.0 0 0 100.0-
TOTAL FINANCLAL 153532 130223 10:1 132,832 0 (100.0)
C. Cost•Distribution •
SOURCS,5 0F'FINANCING -
7-"v on-n1 FY O C '0/
z n:-02 Cost Dis'r.'-.0*-ion 'Adopted Recommended Change
County Share 132,832 44,408 (62;8)
City Share 0 44,408 100:0
Indioendent District Share 0 44.407 100:0
Gser"Fee 30:900 32,000 3.6 ,
Other Revenues. 0 0 0.0
TOTAL FINANCLC 163,732 180,223 10.1 ...,.
D. Summary of Positions:
STAY-TING SUMMARY
FY 00-0i FY 01-0 °A .
Sta.-ft-inn Adopted Recommended. Chance
Permanent Pbsition• 2:00 1.15 (42.3)
Extra Help 0.00 0.00 0.0
Overtime 0.00 0.00 0.0
TOTAL'POSITIONS .2.00 1.15 (42.5)
1 •
•
E. Workload
WORICL O kD SUMMARY
• • FY 00-01 FY 01 02 . %Change
4 pared ommended`c • c^nrr Adnnted
Proposals;(Total) . 20 20 0.0
Formations 3 2 0.0 .
Sphere Adoptions .2 2 0.0
Sphere Amendments 5 5 0.0
Complex Proposals 5 5 0.0 .
F. Summary of Significant Changes
• Beginning FY 01-02, in accordance with the Cortese-Knox-Eertzberg Local'Go3e nrnent Reorganization Act of 2000, LA=CO
must approve its own budget The Commission must annually adopt a pronosed,budget by May in and a final budget by June 15,
of each year. The budget must be atleasrequal to the budget adopted for the-.previous fiscal-year unless the commission finds that
reduced staffing or program costs will sail allow the LkF C0 to fulfillthe nuctoses:and';eouirements of the Act.
• The County, the tides and independent Special district 'will share LAFCO rending, each paying 113 of the cost not covered by
user fees and other revenues. Each city's and,e ssicr's fencing allocation is determined by annual revenues reposed to the sate
controller. The county auditor will prepare andsend bilk to Board'of'Simerfators, cities and districts after July i for their share of
LAFCO costs.
At the end of the fiscal year, if the Commission finds that it has a fund balance;:it'-may retain those funds to offset costs it the
following fiscal year's budget. If during the. fiscal year the Commission does not have sufficient funds to operate, 'te Board of
supervisors may loan the Commission funds and recover those funds i i the Commission's i
'_budget for the following fiscal year.
• For FY 01-02 LAFCO proposes to continue its MOU with the'County for 3 parttime employees in the County Administacor's
Office. Total FTEs. are 1.15 consisting g of - t ?:Administrative AralvstLi (Executive Officer): n F?E Adminisrate Analyst
U (Assistant Executive Officer) and E
Secretary By to MOU. the County Counsel will provide legal services _ rCCwiil
also contnue to contact with the County for facilities, including offices and meetirs_room, and equipment.
• Expenditures for FY 01-02 are projected to be 5180. •: representing an 10:'1%-increase from FY 00-01. Revenues generated
from application filing fees are estmaatea to be 5132,000 an increase of 3%Mom FY 00-01. •
• Expenditures are divided into 2 categories: Salaries and Benefits and Services and Supplies. Salaries and Benefits represetts a
decrease of 526,007(28%)primarily due to reduced staffing Mom FY 00-01: Services and Supplies are increasing S-C d08 rc %)
primarily as a result of County cost&assoc:i:.d with facilities, equipment, County .Auditor ter ices, employee reciiinnet. and
legal support. The County Auditor is,proie_dng•a 515,000 cost for the'otu1ng and.collection process in FY 01-02. Legal co_ are
projected to be 530.000. Reductions are anticipated nem year as som°.of these costs are for star up and policy development
associated:wittt the new-law.
• Revenue projections include a 4%COLA furs fee increase.Revenue projections assume that the following mix of proposals will
be stomped in FY 01-02: 20 applications including 5 coroie\.r or:anizations, 2 "ascict formations. 2 sphere of in=:-_ence
adoptions, and 5 sphere of influence amendmertts. Revenues do not reflect proposals for the consolidation of fire protection
districts as the conniiission supports.such proposals by waving filing fees. .
•
. .
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
SONOMA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CONEVIISSION
•
. .
•
SONOlviA LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATIONOOMIvIISSI01•1
(LAFCO)
ECCUTIYE•
OFFICER
•
Analyst (.15 F 1.E.) •
• ASSIST.A1.7. EXECUTTIVE OFFICER.
Ad/nuns-calve Analyst L (.) )
CC)IvEvES,SION CLERIKJLAFC0 SECRETARY (.5,F
•
. .
•
•
. .
•
•
• FY 01-02 LAFCO Proposed Budget •
Dept_70
Div. 88
pecticjT01
•
Olridey.788018
Fund 50008000
FY 01-02 Total 'Increasel(De
Sub-object Title FY•00-01 Budget Budget Request crease)
5100 Positions $77,397 561.552 ($15,845) -20%
5130 Commissioners $6,079 • 55,079 , $0 0% •
5210 Retirement 511.579 57,785 (53,894) -33%
5220 FICA 57,753 • S5G74 (32,679) -35%
5300 Health Ins 511,296 _ 57,504 .(53,792) ,-34%
5310 Disabl. 51.235 - 5666 (3570) -46% •
5320 Dental • 51,190 $792 '. (5398) -33%
.-e Ins 5275 545 (5233) -54%
. 5340 Vision Ins. 5406 5229 (5177) 44%
5400 Wk Comp 31.375 51,971 3593 43%
,.
5907 Salary Savings (5988) SD 5988 -100%
TOTAL SAL&BEN $117,704 591,697 (525,007) -22% .
6040 Communicadons • 51.250 Si 250 50 0%
• 6103 Liability Ins: 5135- .569 ' • (366) 49%
61 0 Maintenance 550 350 $0 • 0%
6280 Memberships 8650 I 31,300 $650 . 100% .
6400 Office sxcerse.s 55';500 _6,500. SO 0%
6410 Postage . 950: 31,500. 5550 58%
6430 Printing Services • 8250• 5500 5250 100%
6500 Professional Services 531,093 815,000 (316,093) . -52%
6521 County Services • 30 311.307 511,307 0%
6630 Caunty•AuditorServic. 50 31'5',000 315,000 0%
6642 Legal Counsel 50 330.000 530,000 0%
6600 Legal Noticing 31.100 51,100 50 0% ..
7301 County Car 3100 5200 3100 100%
7302 ravel - 52.200. 34.000 5800 25%
7303 Private Car . 3750 3750 $0 0% '.. •
TOTAL SERV:AND SUPP, 846.328 338,526 -842,498 92%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5163,732 5160,223 $16,491 . 10%
3141 Fee.Revenues 530.900 532,000 $1,100 3%
2901, County 3132.532 349,408 - (383,424) -169%
2910 Cities SO 349,408 349,408 100%
2930 District SO 549,407 349,437 100%
TOTAL REVENUES. 51E2,732 5180.223 • 516,491 9%
• ''NET COST $0 $0 • 50 0%
•
,� RECE1 Ff
��s, Di d�I �� ''C�� MAY 0 9 2U01 i
•,
• LOCAL AGENCY'FORMATION COMMISSION CITY MANAGER I
575'ADMINISTRAflON DRIVE.ROOM 104A,'.SANTA ROSA. CA 95403
(707) 565-2577 FAX1707) 565-3778
STEVEN J.SHARPE MICHAEL J.CALE
Executive Officer Cncirrnen
DATE: May 3, 2001
L OuE Cj
OrinTO: All Cities and Special Districts 1.0
FROM: Steve Sharpe,Executive Officer
RE: LAFCO
The Local Agency Formation Commission;(LAFCO) requests your input regarding its future operations. As
you are aware, the Cortese-Knot-Herzberg Government Reorcanizatioh Act of 2000 (Government Code
Section 56000 et seq.) revises LAFCO operations. Four provisions of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act
affect the operations of LAFCOs regarding g funding, staffing and',rapiiities. Ac.^ordingao the Act, these
provisions are intended to make the Commission neutral and indecendent'by requiring:
1. Commission appointment of executive officer and&ccunsel.
2. Commission determination for office space, equipment and personnel.
3. County, cities and independent specal district cost sharing of LAFCO budget.
4. Commission approves its own budget.
LAFCO currently.conducts its operations according to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the
County providing the following:
1. The County Administrators Office provides LAFCO professional and clerical staffing. Steve Sharpe is
the Executive Officer and provides management and administrative support to the Commission. A
pan-time Assistant Executive Officer and Secretary are being recruited for the day-to-day operations
of the Commission.
2. The County Administrator's Office provides sciities and eguicment for the LAFCO function.
3. The County Counsel's Office provides•legai services to the Commission and its staff. ,
The Commission requested.that staf analyze alternative staffing and facility plans for FY 2001-02. The
analysis includes the preliminary costs and feasibility of county dependent and independent staffing and.
eclitie LAFCO star- has collected some general inform:C':n regarding ,-crioc and costs. The
Commission. is requesting additional input in order tc decide Whether to pursue additional study to
establish an.independent LAFCO.
The following is a, summary of information obtained from CALAFCO (California Association of LAFCOs)
and another local- governmental agency: the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA). SCTA
staffing and operational needs are similar to L=FCO's.. The SCTA relocated its operations independent
from the Sonoma County Permit and Resources Department in 1999.
Staffing
At a minimum the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act requires that LAFCOs actively appoint their staff rather
than relying on the default that the County.provide staffing.The Act describes alternatives including:
IP
• Contracting with the County for executive officer, legal counsel, other staff and facilities.
• Employ staff paid directly by the commission who may be housed in private offices leased by the •
commission or in offices rented from the county or some other public agency.
• Contracting with an independent firm for executive officer, legal counsel or both.
Staffing needs, budget constraints, local politics and other conditions will determine'what;works best for
each LAFCO. Here are 4 examples:
1. San:Mateo LAFCO has a:contractwith the County for County staff servicesto`LAFCO.
2. Orange LAFCO has a contract between the ,County' and "LAFCO defining LAFCO employee
3. El Dorado LAFCO has a contract with employee,,utilizing County Personnel Policies.
4. Santa'Berbara LAFCO utilizes an independent consultantfor its staffing.
Staffing plans should consider the workload impacts of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg. Act. Some
requirements may require a :significant_:amount orstaff time, to implement new policies, design new
procedures and then to maintain those polices and orocecures. In any case, LAFCOs that hire•
independent staff will also need to establish personnel pcliciesand job descriptions forthose;ipositions.
Facilities,.Equipment and Supplies
Now that LAFCO's are considered autonomous agencies, many LAFCO's are deliberating remaining in
County office space or moving to private office space. There are several advantages and disadvantages
or either option. While there is n6Tight answer. there' are several factors that need to be evaluated
including cost, convenience for stair and customers. The following_ table describes these.
Option . Potential Advantages Potential Disadvantages F ;Notes_',
•
Remain in or move T: Quick, convenient access o '1".. Perceived Influence by Ealuate:'cost • •
into County,Offices network of county county on LAFCO comparisons
departments.. opera ons and staff (County may be ,.
2. Possible savings in rent recommendations. more costly.)
office:equipment by snare 2. Facilities and services may • County could
with County departments. be:inadequate. refuse housing.
3. No additional efforfto move, 3. Countybuiiding policies;and • Evaluation of
if already in place. closures. future.orfce
4. Easier one stop'for 4. Dependent upon space needs
customers. cooperation and goodwill of • • snouldiinclude
6. Full.buildine services in :lace County. consideration of.
_ as.a package deal. additional staff.
if they will be ,..
necessary.• Don't assume
county will
charge former
•
• A-87 cost
amounts.
Remain in or .6. More clearly oistinguisne Potentials for additional, Evaluate cost
Relocate off-site LAFCO as am autonomous costs necessary to maintain comparisons,
private offices agency. separate offices and County-may not
7. Custom facilities to needs. - equipment. be less and/or
8. Administration of rent, and 6. Possible cost surprises. may not be,cost
business services: 7. Physical separation(frorn effective for
County (services, meeting actual space
spaces', etc.). and services' •
• needs.
• LAFCO office
location may not
• be priority for
County.
Projected FY 2001-02 costs for use of::existing space in the County Administrator's Office including space
and equipment used as well as overhead for use of conference and meeting rooms is approximately
$11.300: Additional costs will include other county departmental services including PRMD, County Auditor,
•
Information Systems Department and County Counsel. An extraordinary cost will be for the Auditor who
will have to deterrriine and bill agencies for LAFCO funding. The Auditor is projecting a $15,000 cost for
FY 2001-02. Counsel isprojectincaa cost for FY 2001-02 of$30.000 due to policy development associated
with new laws and 2 ccmplexdistrictformations. Reductions may occur in the following fiscal year.
As of spring of this year, costs for leasing private office space will range from.about $1.65 to 31.70 per
square foot according to the County real estate manager, These figures are based on local rental rates
and on a proposal completed. recently for relocation of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority
(SCTA). Space and equipment needs for LAFCO may be similar. The SCTA is staffed with 3 people and
has leased approximately 1000 square feet in downtown Santa Rosa. Annual rent is approximately
320,000-325,000 per year. Additional "one-time" costs would be necessary for tenant improvements,
furnishings, and equipment and moving expenses. These costs could vary substantially. The SCTA's
"one-time" costs range.from $7,500 to $21,000 dependent on levels of improvements. In addition to
staffing costs, LAFCO would contract for counsel, auditing and accounting services.
The attached questionnaire':will assist the Commission in determining its future structure and function.
Please complete it and return to me before June 1, 2001.
c: LAFCO Commissioners .
• .
•
410 .
"0 nip,r--j o Lo oil
LOCAL AGENCY,,FORMATION •COMMISSION •
575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE.,ROOM 104A,SANTA'ROSA, CA 95403
(707) 565-2577 FAX)707) 565-3778
STEVEN,J.'SHARPE'
MICHAEL J.CALF
Executive Officer Chctrmcn
LOCAL AGENCY FORLvLATION CONLNESSION•(LAFCOy
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Does your-agency support continued use'of County staffng, counsel and facilities for the
Sonoma LAFCO.function?
Yes No •
2. Does your agency support independent staffing, counsel and facilities for the-Sonoma LAFCO
function?
Yes No •
•
Signature of authorized agency representative:
Title
Name of city or district responding:
•
•