The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStaff Report 18 06/18/2001 1 � F 1 8 CITY OF`PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA AGENDA BILL Agenda Title: Consideration, of the Eastside Neighborhood Meeting Date: lliance's appeal of the Planning Cornniission decision to grant the .June 1'8, 2001 alvation Army Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of buildings and operation of religious services and social programs on an approximately 2 acre site in the R-1-6,500 zoning district at 721 South McDowell.Boulevard, APN 00.7-570-028 Department: Director ContacfPerson: Phone Number: Community Michael C. o etsi Lewitter 778-4301 Development. 11 Cost of Proposal: $2,200.00 for appeal (estimated 40+ hours of Account Number: contract planner time). Fees collected and paid for appeal$160:00. Total costs for processing project application$8 800.00 (estimated Name of Fund: 160+ hours of contract planner time). Fees collected and paid for, CUP $1,240.00. Attachments to Agenda Packet Item: 1. February 13, 2001, Planning Commission Agenda Report With attachments. 2. February 13, 2001, Planning Conimission Minutes. 3. March 27, 2001, Planning Commission Agenda Report with attachments. 4. March 27,2001, Planning Commission Minutes 5. Planning Commission Resolution Approving the Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit. 6. April 8, 2001, appeal letter from Scot Steele and Susan Zanotti. 7. Revised Master Schedule of Operations. Summary Statement: Scot Steele and Susan Zanotti, representing the Eastside Neighborhood Alliance, have filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the Salvation Army. The appeal is based on three points: 1) That the project's proposed childcare center, which would be open until 10:00 p.m., is not in conformance with the General Plan; 2) That the 25% reduction in off-street parking spaces pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 20-603 will cause the parking to be inadequate; and 3) That the proposed 2,300 square foot supply area portion of the social services building is a warehouse which isprohibited by the Zoning Ordinance. Council Priority: The Salvation Ai i y'project, which includes transitional housing and job counseling and childcare, implements priorities of Petaluma's Consolidated Plan updated and adopted in May of 2000. Specifically, the project enhances the community's childcare capacity for low-income households, with particular focus on welfare-to-work,and provides programs which provide job-related assistance to low-income persons. Recommended City Council Action/Suggested Motion: Adopt a resolution denying the appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the Salvation Army Conditional Use permit. • Reviewed by Finance Director: Review• a _ :tv Attorne Approved by City Manager: Date: ar• Date: 7� 41r1• dav's Date. Revision# and Date Revised: File Code: 1 ■ • CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA June 18, 2001 AGENDA REPORT FOR Appeal of Planning Commission's approval of Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Scot Steele and Susan Zanotti, representing the Eastside Neighborhood Alliance, are appealing the Planning'Commission's approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow construction of buildings and operation of religious services and social programs on an approximately 2 acre site in the R-1-6,500 zoning district at 721 South McDowell Boulevard, APN 007-570-028. The appeal is based on three points: 1) That the project's proposed childcare center, which would be open until 10:00 p.m., is not in conformance with the General Plan; 2) That the 25% reduction in off-street parking spaces, pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 20-6.03, will cause the parking to be inadequate; and 3) That the proposed 2,300 square feet°supply area of the social services building is a warehouse which is prohibited by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. BACKGROUND: • On June 21, 2000; the Salvation Army Petaluma Center submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a new 150-seat chapel, a social services and supplies building and a childcare'centerin the R-1-6,500 zoning district at 721 South McDowell Boulevard. The site is the location of the former Neighborhood Church. The proposal includes the operation of a variety of social programs including childcare, counseling and food distribution. The existing church building is to be remodeled for use as administrative offices and classrooms. During the school year, this space will also be used for an after-school program until 6:00 p.m. where approximately 15-20 school-aget children will be supervised by 3 to 5 adults. The new chapel will be used for Sunday:services as well as coniiriunity meetings or special functions typical of churches such as weddings : • There are two existing residences:on the site. One house.(currently used as a multipurpose room) will be demolished; the other house will continue to be used as a dwelling, The Salvation Army intends to provide general social services including transitional housing counseling, job counseling, 'Utility assistance and grocery distribution in the new 5,070 square foot social services building. Approximately 2,300 square feel of this building will be used for storage of emergency supplies for disaster relief; storage of palletized food supplies for distribution to the needy and a garage'.for the Salvation Army mobile field canteen van. • The childcare center is proposed to be licensed for a maximum of 60 children, preschool age and younger, and operate from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays. No more than 40 2 • children will be cared for during the evening hours, with peak attendance expected to be between • 7:00 and.9:00 p.m. Per Section 20-300 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance, all the proposed uses;on the site would require 64 off-street parking spaces.:However, pursuant to.Section 20-603, the Planning Director has determined, based on the applicant's Master Schedule of Operations, that a 25 percent reduction in the required off-street parking is permitted_because the uses will be staggered to such an extent that the reduced number of spaces would be adequate to serve all uses sharing the facility. With the 25 percent reduction, a total of 48 parking spaces are required; 50 will be provided. Please refefto the attached Planning Cominissionstaffreports for more detailed information. The Planning Commission held a public;hearing on the Conditional Use Permit on February 13, 2001. At that time, the Commission continued the item to allow the applicant's consultants to submit addendums;to their studies to address:concerns related to cut-through traffic, parking,.and noise and lighting impacts. The Commission also requested that the City Attorney provide an. opinion as to whether the childcare element of the project, as well as the food distribution and counseling services are subject to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000; whether the 2,300 square feet supply area in the proposed Social Services building constitutes a "warehouse", which is not permitted in R-1 districts;and whether an alleged,loss in property values for neighboring properties occurring as a result of the project should be considered in the.Initial,Study of Environmental Impacts or by the Planning Commission'in their deliberations. The Planning Commission also requested that staff. provide notification of the g 4 p continued public hearing to residents and.;property owners within 600 feet of the -subject' • property. The second Planning Commission public hearing was held on March 27. After taking additional testimony and considering the City Attorney''s comments and the consultants' reports, the Commission unanimously approved the Conditional Use Permit with a total of"97 conditions,, including a condition;requiring the Salvation Army to submit written confirmation to the City that they would not seek legal remedies under the Religious Land Use and institutionalized Persons<Act; that they agree to abide by all conditions and mitigation measures; that they will install the fences/walls necessary to mitigate sound and light, that they will provide a phone number with 24 hour access to address immediate concerns of the neighbors; that Salvation Army personnel will occupy the single-family dwelling on the property; and that the Salvation Army will not make changes to or add any social services which are not listed in the Project Description or the Master Schedule of Operations. The Commission also imposed a condition requiring:the,applicant to submit an.alternative site plan for consideratioM whereby the childcare center would-berelocated to the general area of the proposed social,se"rvices building and the social services building would be moved to the rear,of the site and consideration of alternative parking arrangements to increase the number of off-street spaces. The neighbors also requested, and were granted, conditions requiring,that priority be given to neighborhood children for up to 25% of the openings in,the childcare center and that the sound/light mitigating fence/wall.,and the perimeter landscaping be installed prior to construction of the buildings. In addition, the starting time of the childcare was delayed from 6:00 a.m: to 7:00 a.m. 3 • Scot Steele and Susan Zanotti, representing the Eastside Neighborhood,Alliance, have appealed the Planning Commission's approval of the CUP. In their April.8th`letter, Mr. Steele and Ms. Zanotti request that the Council overturn the Planning Commission's approval on the grounds that 1) That the project's proposed childcare center, which would be open until 10:00 p.m., is not in conformance with the General.Plan; 2) The off-street parking will not be adequate; 3) The proposed supply portion of the social services building is not permitted in R-1 districts. Staff offers the following in response to the three major arguments presented in the appellants' letter for overturning the Planning Commission's decision: 1. The project was found by staff and the Planning Commission to be in conformance with the General Plan; specifically, the project implements the following goals, policies and objectives: Chapter 3, Objective .(i): Upgrade the quality of public, residential, commercial and industrial development throughout the city. Chapter 3, Objective (o). Encourage adaptive re-use of vacant or underutilized structures. Chapter 7, Goal 6. Address the childcare needs of Petaluma's working parents. Chapter 7, Objective (u). Encourage "all-day" care centers and private preschools to provide facilities for year-around.care. Chapter 7, Objective(w) Look for ways to make child care affordable for low-income families. Chapter 9, Objective (d). Provide housing opportunities for persons of all economic levels. Chapter 9, Objective (g): Improve the conditions of the city's existing housing. Theappellants note that the General Plan encourages the use of existing public school facilities for before and after school child care. While this may be appropriate for school-age children, the childcare center is intended to provide care for infants and preschoolers and will be equipped with sleeping accommodations for the children. The appellants also state that the General Plan requires the City to minimize the amount of noise that future development creates and the amount of noise to which the community is exposed. The acoustical specialist:has determined that noise impacts would be within the allowable Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code performance standards. • 2. The applicant's consultingtraffic engineer thoroughly reviewed the proposed uses for the site and concluded that the project's parking meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements. This conclusion was confirmed by the City's traffic engineer. 3. Staff and the Planning'Commission have determined that the supply area portion of the Social Services building is an ancillary use as defined in the Section 1-203 of the City Zoning Ordinance. This section defines "ancillary" as any use "that is 4 • subordinate to the principal use..For the purposes of determining subordinate use, the following May be considered in comparison to the principal use:intensity of activity, lip proportion of total space utilized; hours of operation, etc." Furthermore, the R-1 section (Sec. 6-300) of the Zoning Ordinance allows for a variety of ancillary and related'uses "customarily appurtenant" to the principal use Clearly the principal use of this subject parcel has been, and will continue to be, a religious institution. The storage of food items and disaster relief supplies appears to be; ncidental or ancillary to the primary use of the property for educational, religious and social services. This is comparable to single-family homeowners who use portions of their property for storage of personal items. The supply area (including the area to be used as a garage for the canteen van) will constitute less than 10 percent of the building area on the site. If a homeowner with a 2;600 square foot home (including the garage).:were to use a two-car garage (400 square feet),for-storage, it would constituteapproximately 15 percent of the building area The appellant argues that the isupply area component of the subject proposal is a warehouse, which is a conditionally permitted use in the R-1 zoning district. Staff has consistently applied the conditional use sections of Zoning Ordinance to the proposed primary, or principal uses of a.property. The supply area has been interpreted to be ancillary to the primary use of subject property any therefore, cannot viewed as a conditionally permitted,use in the R=1 District. In the April 8 letter, the appellants further request that the project be sent back to the Planning Commission with instructions to make the following changes: 1) Elimination of the supply area in the social services building; 2) Reduction in;the childcare hours of operation to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m:; 3) Submittal of a'revised Master Schedule of Operations which includes all proposed uses; 4) Inclusion of all of the Salvation Army's spoken promises in the CUP; 5)Finalization of noise mitigation measures including construction of a sound wall priorto construction, reduction in construction days and hours, relocation of the childcare building and outdoor play'areas, limitations on deliveries on site, replacement of neighbors' existing windowswith dual-paned windows, prohibition,of outdoor amplified music, written documentation that only electric fork lifts and electric leaf blowers will be used at.the site, prohibition of high climbing structures in the children's play areas, and::limitation on the,hours in which the doors for the,supply area may be opened and shut;6) Additional traffic studies be performed; 7).Provision of adequate parking; 8) Parking lot security in the form of a locked gate when the site is not in use; 9) Elimination,of all lights when the site is not in use; 10) The inclusion of construction start and completion dates in the CUP; 11) Installation of landscape,and sound walls prior to construction; 12),Inclusion-in - the CUP ofwhen.and-by whom the=facility kitchens will be used; 13) Inclusion of limitations on the use, of the showers for employees only; 14). Neighborhood input on the design of the buildings facing McDowell Boulevard,"15) Submittal of a soils report due:to the"possibility of a septic system on the site; 16) Thorough;review by the Building•Official to ensure that there,are • adequate building setbacks; 17) The appointment of a mediator to work out details. Although the requested changes to the project proposed in the appeal letter are not part of the formal,appeal, staff has addressed:each point for the Council's information: • 5 1. As previously stated, staff and the Planning Cotntnissron havedetermined that under the provisions of the Zoning,Ordinance,the supply area in the social.services building is ancillary and subordinate to the uses on the site, and therefote,'permitted by the Zoning Ordinance." The roll-up doors will be the same as those on a single-car residential garage. 2. The need for flexible "day care for entry-level'workers has been documented (please see Attachment 7 of the.Planning Commission staff report dated February 13, 2001). The above General Plan policies and the Consolidated Plan priorities support the proposal for childcare. After hours daycare is intended to address the needs of entry- level workers who work in service-oriented jobs. 3. The Salvation Army has submitted a new Master Schedule of Operations that includes all proposed uses.on"the site (See Attachment 7). • 4. Captain Hoover's promises, expressed at the March 27 Planning Commission meeting, were included in the conditions of approval. 5. A) The conditions of approval require the sound wall/fence to be constructed prior to issuance of building permits.. B) Condition of approval #30 is the standard condition for hours of construction; reducing the construction hours will lengthen the • construction process. C) The project architect is working"on an alternative site plan. However, staff, the architect, the applicant and the community childcare licensing 'person have some concerns regarding relocating the childcare center. The relocation would place the children in the center of the site rather'than allowing them to be isolated towards thereat of the site from the other activities on the property. The representative of the "state childcare licensing department noted that fencing would have to be installed'to ensure the children's safety if the childcare building is placed at the center of the site D) Deliveries to the site are made by one .18-foot truck and are for supply replenishment no deliveries are made by semi-trucks. It is unlikely that any deliveries will occur after 5:00 p.m. E),As previously stated, the acoustical consultant has determined that noise from the project will not exceed the City's performance standards; therefore, there is no heed for a mitigation measure requiring the replacement of neighbors' 'windows: F) Captain Hoover has explained that amplified music.has been part of their church services since they moved to this site. There is no intention of amplifying the music out of doors. G) The Salvation Army has agreed to use electric forklifts. H) Review of the playground equipment will take place at the time of SPARC approval. I) According to the Master Schedule of Operations, deliveries to the supply'area'portion of the "social services building will occur between the hours of 830 a.m. and 12:00 noon on Mondays, Tuesdays and Saturdays. J) The requirement for electric leaf blowers is addressed in condition of approval No.3. • 6. The March.12th'traffic study addressed the potential problem of"cut-through" traffic. Mr. Tilton'found that, with the circulation as.proposed, approximately 10 additional vehicles could be"expected to use Sarkesian Drive or Marian Way. This would be a 6 . less than significant impact because the traffic volumes. of these streets are, and • would be expected to remain, below 25 percent of the.ideal capacity of the streets. Mr. Tilton previously reviewed the history of traffic collisions in this area. At the first Planning Commission public hearing, it was noted that there were no reported collisions between 1996 and 1999 near this site. 7. At the time of the writing of this staff report, the applicants were considering. alternative parking lot configurations. Mr:. Tilton's March 12th traffic 'report concluded that the proposed parking for the project would meet the requirements of the Petaluma,Zoning Ordinance. 8. A gate to lock the parking lot when the site is not in use was not recommended`bythe Police Department. The site will not be vacant even after hours since a Salvation Army representative will be residing;in the house at the front of:the property. 9. Condition of approval No. 40 requires that security lighting be on between dusk and dawn. All"other lights are to be set to turn off at close of business. • 10. Many projects are constructed in. phases. If the project is approved, the Salvation Army will have consultants prepare a feasibility study to determine how much money will be needed and how long it will take to raise the necessary funds. If the funding is available, the project will proceed.immediately. 11. Condition of approval No.14 requires the installation of perimeter landscaping and • the sound/light mitigating fence/wall to be installed prior to issuance of building permits. 12. This.project does not include a `-`soup kitchen". There ispne,kitchen;in the Fellowship Hall for church members' potluck dinners. There is another kitchen in the childcare center to prepare the children's meals and snacks. According to the state childcare licensing representative, a commercial kitchen is not required.; 13. The showers for employee use are required by the Bike Committee and revised Zoning Ordinance Section 20-1300. 14..Neighbors will be notified when the project comes before the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. 15. Standard condition,of approval No. 69 addresses the removal of any septic system on the site.: A soils report will be required by the Building Department at the'time of building;permit application. 16. The setbacks for the buildings have been reviewed by the Planning Department, • Building. Department and Fire Department. These departments will review the plans again prior to issuance of a buildin g permit. • 7 • ■ 17. The Salvation Army has held;a total of 7 community meetings beginning last August when the plans were modified in response to neighbors' ,comments. Both City Staff and the Salvation Army have been responsive.to neighbors' concerns. 3. ALTERNATIVES: a. Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's approval of the Conditional Use Permit. b. Grant the appeal,thereby denying the Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit. 4. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This is a private development project subject to any applicable City Special Development Fees and standard processing permit fees. The City collected, the standard application fees of $1,240.00 and the standard appeal fee of$160.00. This money is used for mailing copies of this notice to interested parties regarding the proposed project, but does not cover staff time to prepare and review the staff report. Af least 160 hours of contract planner time, at a cost of approximately $8,800.00,'has been expended to date. 5. CONCLUSION: • The Planning Commission determined.that potentially significant impacts would be reduced to a level of less than significant and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Commission supported staffs findings and adopted a;resolution approving the Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit. 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's unanimous decision to approve the ConditionalUse Permit based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed'in the attached resolution. • • • S: CC-City Council/reports/salarmyccappeal • 8 • • 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY'OF.PETALUMA . 2 DENYING THE APPEAL OF SCOT STEELE AND SUSAN ZANOTTI FOR THE 3 EASTSIDE,NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF THE,PLANNING'COMMISSION 4 DECISION TO APPROVE THE SALVATION ARMY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 5 721 SOUTH MCDOWELL BOULEVARD, APN 007-570-028 6 7 WHEREAS, on February U and March 27, 2001, the Planning Commission of the City 8 of Petaluma held a public. hearing to consider the Salvation Army's application for a 9 Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of buildings and operation of a variety of 10 ..religious and social programs on a 2' acre site in the R-1-6,500 zoning district at 721 11 South McDowell Boulevard, APN 007-570-028; and 12 13 WHEREAS, after considering the public testimony, application materials, and Initial 14 Study, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that 15 the project, with the inclusion:ofMitigation Measures, will not have a significant adverse 16 effect on the environment, arid approved the Conditional,Use Permit; and 17 18 WHEREAS, on April 9, 2001, the City Clerk received a letter of appeal from Scot Steele 19 and Susan Zanotti, representing the Eastside Neighborhood Alliance; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Petaluma City Council held a noticed public/hearing on June'18, 2001. 22 • 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, based on the evidence 24 and testimony presented for the record at the public hearing, hereby finds that the 25 findings listed below apply to the Salvation.Arnty Conditional Use Permit and hereby 26 denies the Steele/Zanotti, appeal, thereby allowing construction of buildings and the 27 operation of religious.and social programs subject to the conditions listed below. 28 29 Findings for a Conditional Use Permit: 30 31 1. That the project, as conditioned, will conform to the requirements and the intent 32 of the Zoning Ordinance; and the General. Plan. Specifically, the proposal 33 implements General.Plan Chapter 7, Goal 6 and Chapter 3, Objectives (i) and (o), 34 Chapter 7, Objective (u):and Chapter 9, Objectives (d) and (g). Zoning Ordinance 35 Sections 6-401 and 6-409 conditionally permit public and quasi-public buildings 36 and uses of an educational, religious, or public service nature and day care in the 37 R-1-6,500 zoning district:: The standards for conditional uses under Zoning 38 Ordinance Section 21-300 were considered in the,review of this project. 39 40 2. That the use, as conditioned, will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the 41 public welfare of the community. Traffic, noise and lighting studies assert that the 42 project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The 43 architectural and landscaping plans will be subject to the review and approval by 44 the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee to ensure that the project will 45 be•aesthetically pleasing. 46 1 3. The project.implements the priorities of the Consolidated Plan II 2000-2005, • 2 adopted by the City Council on May 15,"2000. 3 4 Conditions of Approval: 5 • ' 6 From the Planning Department 7 1. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is granted to allow construction of a.5,951. 8 square foot, 150-seat chapel; a 5,070 square foot social services and supplies 9 building; a 5,153 square foot childcare center and associated parking and site 10 improvements which shall be substantially as shown on the revised plans dated 11 11/20/00. The operation of the uses shall'be as stated in the Applicant's Project 12 Statement revised 11/20/00. Prior to any change in the operation of the uses; the 13 applicant shall apply for and be granted a Conditional Use Permit modification 14 from the City of Petaluma. 15 16 2. Within five days of an approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the-:applicant shall 17 submit a check in the amount of$35:00 payable to the Sonoma County Clerk for 18 the Notice of Determination filing fee. 19 20 3. The use of ground maintenance equipment shall be restricted to 10:00 a:m. to 4:00 21 pan. to reduce any potential annoyance. In-addition, only electric leaf blowers are 22 permitted. 23 •24 4. " The Salvation Army Petaluma Center Advisory Board shall include two people 25 from the South McDowell neighborhood who may attend monthly meetings' 26 during which any concerns shall be addressed. Documentation of the 27 appointments shall be received by the City prior to issuance of-the Certificate of 28 Occupancy. 29 • 30 5. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, evidence shall be provided to the 31 City that the phone number of the on-call administrative assistant has beenprovided 32 to adjacent neighbors and published in the phone book for their use in reporting 33 operating.problems. 34 35 6. The applicants/developers shall defend„indemnify and hold harmless the City of 36 any of its boards, commissions, agents, officers and employees from any claim, 37 action or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers or 38 employees to attack„set aside, void or annul the approval of the project when such 39. claim or action is brought within the time period provided for in applicable State 40 and/or local statutes. The City shall;promptly notify the applicants/ developers of 41 any such claim, action or proceeding. The City shall coordinate in the defense: 42 Nothing contained in this condition shall prohibit the City from participating in a , 43 defense of any claim, action,, or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's 44 fees and costs;and the.City,defends the action in good faith. 45 110 I 7. The operating hours of the childcare center shall be reduced to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 • 2 p.m. Monday through.,Saturday. 4 8. An 8-foot tall fence/wall shall be installed on the north and east sides of the site to 5 mitigate sound and light as required. The design of the fence/wall shall be subject 6 to SPARC review and approval. 7 8 9. The project shall use lighting Option No. 2 as developed by Winzler and Kelly in 9 the Illuminance Study and Photometric Report dated'October 20, 2000. 10 11 10. An accurate,Master Schedule of Operations shall be,submitted to the City prior to 12 or at the time of SPARC'submittal. 13 14 11. The Salvation Aiiay shall give priority to neighborhood children for up to 25% of 15 the openings in the childcare center. 16 17 12. The Salvation Army has agreed to provide to the following prior to issuance of 18 building permit: 19 20 • Plans to upgrade existing Chapel subject to review and approval of 21 SPARC. 22 • A letter to the City verifying they will not seek legal remedies under the �23 Religious Land Use,and,Institutionalized Persons,:Act:of 2000. 24 • A letter agreeing to abide by all conditions and,mitigation measures. 25 • An agreement in writing to install the fences/walls necessary to attenuate 26 sound and light: 27 • A phone number with 24-hour access to address immediate concerns of 28 the neighbors. 29 • Documentation that Salvation Army personnel will occupy the single- 30 family dwelling on the site (after the current lease expires). 31 • Documentation that if the Commanding Officer at the Petaluma Center 32 changes, the Salvation Army will not make changes to or add any social 33 services which are not listed in the Project;Description or on the Master 34 Schedule of Operations 35 36 13. The applicants shall submit an alternative site plan whereby the childcare center 37 shall be relocated to the general area of the proposed social services building and 38 the social services building shall be moved to the rear of the site The applicants 39 shall also consider parking alternatives to increase the number of parking spaces 40 on site The alternative design shall be considered by.the Planning Commission 41 prior to SPARC submittal. 42 ' 43 14. The sound/light mitigating fence/wall and the perimeter, landscaping shall be •44 installed prior to issuance of building permits. 45 46 1 Mitigation Measures • 2 15. All earthwork, grading, trenching, back-filling and compaction operation shall be 3 conducted in accordance with the City's Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance 4 (Title 7, Chapter 17:31, of the Municipal Code 5 6 16. All public and/or:private improvements shall be subjecfto inspection by City staff 7 for compliance with the approved Improvement Plans, prior to City acceptance. • 8 9 17. The applicant shall submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by a 10 registered professional engineer an as integral part of the grading plan: The Erosion 11 and Sediment Control Plan shall,be subject to review and approval of the City 12 Engineer and Planning Director,-prior to the'issuance of a grading permit The Plan 13 shall include temporary erosion control, measures to be used dtung grading 14 operations at the site to prevent discharge of sediment and contaminants into the 15 drainage system. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall 'include the 16 following measures as applicable. 17 18 a. Material and equipment for implementation of erosion control measures 19 shall be on —site by October 1st. All grading activity shall be completed by 20 October 15th, prior to the onset of the rainy season, with all disturbed areas 21 stabilized, and, if applicable, revegetated by October 31s`. Upon approval by 22 the •Petaluma City Engineer, extensions for short-term grading may be 23 allowed. Special erosion control measures may be required by the City 24 •Engineer in conjunction:with.any specially permitted rain •season grading. 25 26 18. All construction activities shall comply with the Uniform Building•Code 27 regulations for seismic safety (i.e., reinforcing perimeter and/or load bearing walls, 28 bracing parapets, etc.). 29 30 The applicant shall incorporate the following Best Management Practices into the 31 construction and. improvement plans and clearly indicate these provisions in the 32 specifications. The construction contractor shall incorporate these measures•into 33 the required erosion and sediment plan;to limit dust and exhaust emissions during 34 construction. 35 36 19. Grading and construction equipment operated during construction activities shall be 37 properly muffled and maintained to minimize emissions: Equipment shall be 38 turned off when not in use. 39 40 20. Exposed soils shall be watered periodically during construction, a minimum of 41 twice daily. The frequency of watering shall be increased if wind speeds exceed 15 42 mph. Only purchased City water or reclaimed water.shall be used for this purpose. 43 Watering shall.also occur on weekends and holidays when work is not in progress. 44 45 21. Construction site involving earthwork shall provide fora gravel pad area 46 consisting of an impermeable liner and drain rock at the constriction entrance to clean mud and debris from construction vehicles prior to entering the public • 2 1 roadways. Street surfaces,in°the vicinity of the project shall.be routinely swept and 3 cleaned of mud and dust carried onto the street by construction vehicles. 4 5 22. During excavation activities,'haul trucks used to transport soil shall utilize tarps or 6 other similar covering devices4to*reduce dust emissions. 7 8 23. Applicant shall designate a person with authority to require increased watering to 9 monitor the dust and,erosion control program. The name and phone number shall 10 be provided to the City of Petaluma prior to issuance of building permits. 11 12 24. This development shall be subject to the City's storm drainage impact fees to cover 13 the incremental impact/increase it will have on the City's storm drainage system. 14 15 25. All grading activity shall be completed prior to'the onset of the rainy season. All 16 new drainage facilities shall be in place and in operation at that time Grading and 17 excavation activities shall not be permitted during the:rainy season. Extensions for 18 grading and drainage facilities work may be allowed in consultation with the 19 Petaluma City Engineer, based on the sensitivity of the specific project area to 20 erosion, sedimentation, and the effectiveness of temporary (rainy season) erosion 21 measures to be implemented by the applicant. 22 •23 26. Plans submitted at time of application for building permit shall include provisions 24 • for storm water runoff management. The submittal shall- reflect installation of 25 permanent signs at drop ''inlets, if any, to the public storm drain system, which 26 prohibit the deposit of hazardous'materials into the system. 27 28 27. All construction activities shall be performed in a 'manner that minimizes the 29 sediment and/or pollutants entering directly or indirectly into the storm drain 30 system or ground water. The applicant shall incorporate the following provisions 31 _ into the construction plansT and specifications, to be verified by the Planning 32 Department,prior to issuance of grading or building permits: 33 34 a) The applicant shall designate on the improvement plans construction 35 staging areas and 'areas for the storage of any hazardous materials (i.e., • 36 motor oil, fuels, paints etc.) to be used during construction. All construction 37 staging areas shall be located away froth any stream and adjacent drainage 38 areas to prevent runoff from construction areas from entering into the 39 drainage system. Areas designated for storage of hazardous materials shall 40 include proper containment features' prevent contamination from entering 41 drainage areas in thee of spill or.leak: 42 43 b) No debris, soil, sand, cement, concrete, or washings thereof,. or other 44 construction related materials,or wastes, soil or petroleum. or other 5 . organic or earthen material shall be allowed to enter any drainage system. 46 All discarded material including washings and any accidental spills shall be 1 removed and disposed of at an approved disposal site. The applicant shall • 2 - designate appropriate disposal methods and/or facilities on the construction 3 plans or in the specifications. 4 5 28. The applicant shall submit adetailed grading and drainage plan for review and 6 approval by the City Engineer and Planning Department,prior to approval of any 7 improvement plans or the issuance of a grading permit. Project grading and all site 8 drainage improvements shall be designed and,constructed in conformance with the 9 City of Petaluma Engineering Department's "Standard Specifications," and with 10 the Sonoma County Water Agency's"Flood Control Design Criteria," if 11 applicable. Drainage plans shall include supporting calculations of storm drain and 12 culvert size using acceptable engineering methods. No lot-to-lot drainage shall be 13 permitted; Surface runoff shall';be:addressed within each individual kit and then 14 conveyed to an appropriate,storm drainsystem. All hydrologic, hydraulic, and • 15 storm drain system design, if applicable, shall be subject to review and approval of 16 the Sonoma County Water Agency(SCWA), and the City Engineer. 17 18 29. All construction and operation activities shall comply with applicable Performance 19 Standards in thePetaluma Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code.. 20 21 30. All construction activities shall be limited to 7:00 am. to 6:00 p.m. Monday 22 through Friday and 9:00 am. to 5 00 p.m. on Saturdays. Construction shall be • 23 prohibited on Sundays and all holidays recognized by the City of Petaluma, unless 24 a permit is first secured from the City Manager.(or his/her designee) for additional • 25 hours. There will be no start up of machines nor equipment prior to 8:00 am.,. 26 Monday through Friday; no,delivery of materials nor equipment prior to 7:30 a.m. 27 nor past 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; no servicing of equipment past 6:45 28 p:m.,•Monday through Friday. 29 30 , 31. All construction equipment powered by internal combustion equipment shall be 31 properly muffled and maintained to minimize noise. Equipment shall be turned _ 32 off when not in use. 33 34 32. Construction maintenance, storage, and staging areas for construction_equipment 35 shall avoid proximity to residential areas to the maximum extent:practicable. 36 Stationary construction equipment, such as compressors, mixers, etc:, shall be • 37 placed :away from residential areas. and/or provided with acoustical shielding. 38 Quiet construction equipment shall be used when possible. 39 40 33. The applicant shall .designate a Project Manager with authority to implement the 41 mitigation measures who will be responsible for responding to any complaints from 42 the neighborhood, prior to issuance of a building/grading permit. The Project 43 Manager shall determine the cause of_noise complaints (e.g. starting to early, 44 faulty muffler, etc;) and shall takeprompt action to correct the problem. 45. •1 34. Optimize the site plan.to minimize adverse effects on the adjacentneighbors. Play 2 areas for preschoolers should be located as far away from the property line as 3 feasible and the use of elevated play structures rshould.beminimized. 4 5 35. If windows are proposed on,the;rear of the building,adjacent to the residences, these 6 windows should be kept closed during noisy indoor play periods. If complaints are 7 received, windows could be fixed closed. 8 9 36. If noise complaints due to outdoor play activity are received from neighbors once 10 the center is in operation, a secondary solid wood or masonry block wall shall be 11 built either around the play areas or parallel to the existing property line fences on 12 the Salvation Army side of the property line to attenuate noise. These walls should 13 be built to a height which will block the line of sight from the children in the play 14 areas to the rear yards or outdoor use areas of the.residences, 15 16 37. All exterior lighting shall be directed onto the project site and access ways and 17 shielded to prevent glare.and intrusion onto .adjacent.residential properties. Plans 18 submitted for project review and approval shall incorporate lighting plans, which 19 reflect the location and design of all exterior lighting proposed. In no case shall the 20 maximum illumination at ground level exceed 3 footcandle. 21 22 38. Shade trees shall be incorporated along public streets•and within parking areas in IF3 conformance with the City's Site Plan and Architectural Review Guidelines to 24 reduce glare:and provide:shade and screening. 25 26 39. Architectural detail, lighting plans, landscaping plans; specifications on parking lot 27 layout and detailed site plans,shall be subject to review and approval by the Site 28 Plan and Architectural Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 29 30 40. Fixtures providing security lighting shall be controlled by integral photocells, set to 31 turn the fixture on from dusk to dawn or when the light level falls below the preset 32 threshold. All other fixtures shall be controlled by a universal 7-day time clock that 33 can be programmed for time of day operation. "The lights shall be set to turn off at 34 close of business. • 35 36 41. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of the City's Traffic Mitigation 37 Fees. Traffic Mitigation Fees shall be calculated at the time of issuance of a 38 building permit and shall be due and payable before final inspection,or issuance of 39 a.Certificate of Occupancy. 40 41 42. During non-working hours, open trenches and construction hazards within the 42 public right-of-way shall be provided with signage; flashers, and barricades 43 approved by the Street Superintendent to warn oncoming motorists, bicyclists, and 44 pedestrians of potential safety hazards. 015 1 43. All road surfaces shall be restored,to pre-project,conditions after completion of any • 2 project-related utility installation activities. All trench pavement'restorationwithin 3 existing asphalt streets shall receive a slurry seal. - 4 5 44. Frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with t he city's' Street 6 Standards'to provide'for safe access to and from the-site. Curb cuts;,,signing, and 7 striping, if applicable, shall be incorporated into the design as required by the 8 City's' traffic Engineer. Improvement or construction plans "shall be subject to .9 review and approval of the Traffic Engineer prior to issuance of:a grading or 10 building permit. All street frontage improvements shall be constructed to City 11 standards and inspected by City Inspectors prior to final inspections or acceptance 12 of improvements. 13 14 45. Appropriate.signs shall be installed at the southerly driveway to prohibit,outbound 15 left-turn movements onto McDowell,Boulevard South. 16 17 46. The project shall be subject to the ;payment of established City Special 18 Development Fees as applicable, including: Park and Recreation Land 19 Improvements, Sewer and Water°.connection; and Traffic Mitigation as, by 20 City Resolution. 21 22 47. In order to ensure public safety and provide for police surveillance, all non- 23 residential buildings and public use areas shall have security alarms and provide • 24 • motion or heat.sensitive security lighting to parking areas, pedestrian pathways and 25 areas of concealment around the perimeter of'each building. All parking areas and 26 pedestrian pathways shall provide visual access to the extent practicable from 27 public streets and may require minors placed on an angle to be,seen from the street 28 or public right-of-way to provide visual access to areas of potential concealment. 29 30 48. Prior to the issuance of a CertificateofOccupancy, the applicant shall provide.and 31 maintain current emergency contact information on file at the Police;Department. 32 33 49. The project sponsor ,shall': be required to pay for additional water and sewer 34 connections as established hithe,City's Special Development Fee'handout. 35 36 50. Trenching for utilitiesrand;irrigation.shall be kept to:as shallow a depth as;practical, 37 to avoid disturbing potential subsurface resources. 38 39 51. For all construction activities, potential to uncover unknown archaeological 40 resources exist. Should any artifacts, cultural remains, or potential resources•be '41 encountered during construction activities, work in the area of the find shall cease 42 , and the construction contractor shall notify the Director of Planning. 43 Archaeological features include artifacts •of stone, shell, bone, or other- natural 44 materials. Association with artifacts includes hearths, house floors,; and dumps. 45 Historic artifacts potentially include all by-products of human land use greater than • • 46 50 years of age. .Human burials, if encountered, require the notification of the I County Coroner in addition to the monitoring archaeologist.- The City shall consult �2 with qualified cultural resource specialist to evaluate the find" If the suspected 3 remains,are determined to be`potentially significant, all work in the vicinity shall be 4 halted until mitigation measures are incorporated into the design, or the removal of 5 the resource has been accomplished in accordance with recommendations by the 6 archaeologist. The applicant-shall comply with all mitigation recommendations of 7 the archaeologist prior'to commencing work in the vicinity of the archaeological 8 find" The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with consulting a 9 cultural resource specialist"and with implementation of ritigation measures. 10 11 52. The applicant shall be required to obtain all required permits from responsible 12 agencies and provide:proof:ofcompliance to the City prior to issuance of grading 13 or building permits or approval of improvement plans. 14 15 53. The applicant shall incorporate. all applicable code: provisions and required 16 mitigation measures and conditions into the design and improvement plans and 17 specifications for the project" 18 19 54. The applicant shall,notify all employees, contractors, and agents involved in.the 20 project implementation,df the mitigation measures and,conditions applicable to the 21 project and shall ensure compliance with such measures and conditions. Applicant 22 shall notify all assigns and transfers of the same. 34 55. "The applicant shall..designate:a project manager with_authority to implement all 25 mitigation measures and conditions of approval and provide name; address, and 26 phone numbers to the City prior to issuance of any:grading permits and signed by 27 the contractor responsible for construction. 28 29 56. Mitigation measures required,during construction shall be listed as conditions on • 30 the building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for 31 construction. 32 33 From the Bicycle Advisory Committee: 34 57. A total of five covered bicycle parking places shall be provided throughout the 35 development. 36 37 58. One shower and five clothes lockers shall be provided for employees' use. 38 39 59. Exterior seating at benches/tables for a'minimum of 10 persons shall be provided 40 (calculated`at twice the amount of required bicycle parking). This seating shall also 41 serve as an outdoor eating space for employees. 42 43 60. The owners/lessees shall provide a simple one-page,document to the City naming a 44 designated "transportation coordinator" and describing specific incentives for 46 employees and customers to walk/bicycle to the facility thereby encouraging 46 alternatives to driving cars to this facility. Examples include lending bicycles for 1 short errands, monetary or other rewards for not driving, etc. This documentation • 2 shall be received by the City prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 4 61. The development shall have on-site facilities for food storage, preparation and 5 eating accessible to all employees of all buildings. 6 7 62. Under no circumstances should,any pesticide/herbicide be applied in areas used by 8 pedestrians/bicyclists anywhere in this project or the surrounding •area without 9 appropriate signage. 10 • 11 63. This project shall utilize Best Management Practices regarding pesticide/herbicide 12 use and fully commit to Integrated•Pest.Management techniques for the protection 13 of bicyclists and pedestrians. 14 15 From the Engineerine.Department: 16 64. A 10-foot wide right-of-way dedication to the City of Petaluma is required,for the 17 100-foot long portion of parcel street frontage. • 18 19 65. An executed private storm drain,easement grant deed shall be obtained from the 20 adjacent existing Petaluma Ecumemcal Project (PEP) development (APN 007-570- 21 029) located southeasterly of the proposed project. Note: A letter of intent dated. 22 12/21/00 to enter offer•the above-mentioned easement from PEP to the Salvation 23 Army is on,file with the City of Petaluma Community Development Department. 24 � . 25 66. . Hydrology calculations for the•proposed and existing storm-drain.system shall be 26 submitted to the Engineering Section for review. Additionally, the calculations 27 should indicate that the existing storm drain facilities located,on the PEP project are 28 hydraulically capable of handling the increase in peak storm water',n.inoff:based on 29 the proposed site development. Sonoma County Water Agency standards should be 30 used to perform:the analysis. • 31 32 67. All portions of broken, cracked or otherwise damaged sidewalk or driveway 33 approaches located along the entire parcel frontage shall be replaced. 34 35 68. An excavation permit is required for all work within the public right-of-way 36 including sidewalks, driveway approaches, water supply and sewerage installation's, 37 etc. 38 39 69. All existing subsurface wastewater disposal systems and septic;tanks, if any, shall 40 be removed per County of Sonoma Department of Environmental Health standards. 41 42 70. All work within the public right-of-way shall conform to the City of.Petaluma latest 43 standards, codes, policies, etc. 44 45 71. Lotto lot surface drainage and concentrated drainage of public sidewalks shall not 46 occur. 1 • 2 From the Water.Department: 3 72. The contractor shall'submit GPM requirements needed for water connections. The 4 project will require a minimum'of.1" service for domestic and minimum 1" service 5 for irrigation. • 6 7 From the Fire Marshal: (To avoid requests for subsequent,submittals, please show or note 8 all Fire Department requirements on_plans submitted for building permit) 9 10 CHILDCARE BUILDING: 11 73. The building shall be protected by an automatic:fire sprinkler system as required by 12 the Uniform Fire.Code and shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, 13 which will notify the Fire Department in the event of water flow. In addition, a 14 local alarm shall be provided on the exterior and interior of the building. • 15 16 74. Fire alarm system shall',be;connected to a central station monitor that will notify the 17 fire department in the'event of an alarm. 18 19 75. This facility requires an annual Fire Department,permit for a commercial childcare 20 facility. The permit fee i"s $60:00 per year and is due prior to occupancy approval 21 and/or operation. 22 a223 76. This facility shall meet the requirements in the 1998 California Unifo iu Fire Code 4 Article 10 and in FPA.72. 25 26 NEW CHAPEL AND EXISTING CHURCH: • 27 77. Provide a KNOX BOX Fire Department access. KNOX BOX shall contain keys 28 or access codes to buildings. 29 30 78. All curtains, drapes, hangings or other decorative:material shall be flame retardant 31 or treated with an approved fire retardant chemicalby'alicensed State Fire Marshal 32 Applicator. 33 34 79. This'business requires an-annual Fire Depart-bent permit for Places of Assembly of 35 less than 300. The permit fee of$60.00 is due prior to occupancy approval and/or 36 operation. 37 • 38 80. The buildings shall be.protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required 39 by the Uniform Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm 40 monitoring, which will notify the Fie Department in the event of water flow. In 41 addition, alocal alarm shall be provided on the exterior and interior of the building. 42 43 81. A permit is required from the Fire marshal for the installation or alteration of a fire 44 sprinkler system prior to the commencement of work. A minimum of two sets of 5 plans with calculations is required to be submitted for review and approval. 46 1 82. Contractors installing underground fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and • 2 submit two sets of plans for approval prior to commencing work. A hydrostatic test 3 of 200 psi for two hours is required prior to'backfill. All joints shall be visible at 4 time of inspection. Underground installations shall be flushed to Fire Department 5 satisfaction prior to connection to overhead. NOTE: Civil utility plans and/or other 6 plans approved, or not,will not be accepted in lieu of the above requirement. 7 8 83. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma, City Water Department approval prior to 9 charging onsite underground water mains. 10 11 84. All contracts shall have a City business license and a workers' compensation 12 certificateon file with the Fire Marshal's'office. 13 14 85. Provide an approved automatic fire extinguishing system to protect all. cooking 15 equipment. 16 17 86. Fixed fire extinguishing systems shall be installed by a licensed contractor. 18 Contractor shall obtain the required permit from, and submit two sets:of plans for 19 review by, the Fire Marshal. Systems are subject to testing and inspection by the 20 Fire Marshal's office prior to acceptance. 21 22 87. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor, which'will notify 23 the Fire Department in the•event.of an alarm: • 24 • 25 88. All required fire lanes, in which no parking is allowed, shall be designated by 26 painting curbs red. Where no curbs exist, signs approved by the Fire Marshal shall 27 be:installed. • 28 29 89. No combustible construction above the foundation is allowed unless an approved 30 asphalt surfaced road is provided to within 150 feet of the furthest point `of a 31 structure and the fire hydrants have been tested, flushed, and are in service. 32 33 90. Install fire hydrants every 300 lineal feet. No structure or Fire Department sprinkler 34 connection shall be in excess of 150 feet from a fire hydrant: 35 • 36 SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING: 37 91. The building shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required 38 by the Unifoin Fire Code. and shall be provided with central 'station alarm 39 monitoring, which will notify the Fire Department in the event of Water flow, In 40 addition, a local alarm shall be provided on the exterior and interior of the 41 building. 42 43 92. Contractors installing underground fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and 44 submit two setsrof plans;for approval prior to commencing work. A hydrostatic test 45 of 200 psi for two hours is required prior to backfill. All joints shall be°visible: at 46 time of,inspection. Underground shall be flushed io Fire Department 1 • 2 satisfaction prior to connection to overhead. NOTE; Civil:utility plans and/or other - plans approved, or not,will not t?be accepted in lieu of the,above requirement. 3 4 93. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma City Water Department approval prior to 5 charging onsite underground water mains. 6 7 94. All contracts shall have a City business license and a workers' compensation 8 certificate on file with the Fire Marshal's office. 9 10 95. Fire alarm system.shall be connected to a central station monitor that will notify 11 the Fire Department in the event of an alarm. 12 13 96. This plan has been reviewed with the information supplied; subsequent plan 14 submittal for review may be subject to additional requirements, as plans are 15 revised. 16 17 From the Transit Coordinator: 18 97. A transit stop sign (provided by the City), pole. and 'bench per the attached 19 specifications shall be installed at the existing bus stop. 20 21 22 W3 24 25 S:CC-City Council/resolutions/salannyccreso - 26 27 110 • CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA 2 MEMORANDUM 3 4 Community Development Department,Planning Diviiion, 11 English'Street,Petaluma, CA 94952 5 (707) 778-4301 Fax(707) 778-4498 E-mail:planning@ciipetaluma.ca.us 6 7 DATE: February 13,-2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. I 8 9 TO: Planning Commission 10 11 FROM: Betsi Lewitter, Project Planner 12 13 SUBJECT: SALVATION ARMY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP00014) 14 721 SOUTH MCDOWELL BOULEVARD 15 16 17 RECOMMENDATIONS 18 19 1. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration 20 finding that the project, with the inclusion of Mitigation Measures, will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. • 23 2. Staff recommends that the Planning 'Commission approve the Salvation Army 24 Conditional Use Permit; subject to the recommended conditions of approval. 25 26 PROJECT SUMMARY 27 28 Project: Salvation Army Petaluma Center Conditional-Use Permit 29 721 South McDowell Boulevard 30 007-570-028 31 Project File No. CUP00014 32 33 Project Planner: Betsi Lewitter 34 35 Project Applicant: Wayne Miller, Architect, for Salvation Army, Petaluma Corps 36 37 Property Owner: Salvation Army, a California Corporation 38 • 39 Nearest Crc :> et-to Project Site: Caulfield Lane • 40 41 Property Size: 2 acres S °!7t CooNcli . M Ewan AnAcmHear 1 Page 1 1 Site Characteristics: The site is basically flat and-.currently developed with a church, parking lot 2 and two single-family residences, one of which is used as a multi-purpose building for the • 3 church. The rest of the site is undeveloped and covered in native grasses. 4 5 Existing Use: Church and related activities including Bible.School. 6 7 Proposed. Use: Church and related activities including community assembly, social services 8 (counseling), food distribution, disaster`supply storage and childcare. 9 10 Current Zoning: R-1-6,500 11 12 Proposed Zoning: R-1-6,500 13 14 Current General Plan Land Use: Public and Institutional • 15 16 Proposed General Plan Land Use: Public and Institutional 17 18 Subsequent Actions if Project is Approved: 19 • .SPARC.Review and Approval 20 e Building Peiuiits 21 22 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 23 24 The applicants are requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit, to allow operation of a 25 variety of religious services, community assembly• social programs on an approximately two- 26 acre site•in the R-1-6,500 zoning district. The site.is currently developed with a church and two 27 single-family homes — one of which is used as a multi'-purpose'building. The proposal includes 28 the remodel of the existing church building for use as administrative offices and classrooms; 29 construction of a new chapel, the construction of a social services and supplies building and the 30 construction of.a new child care center. One of the existing homes will'be demolished; the other 3 t home will continue to be used as a dwelling unit. 32 33 Anew 5,951 square foot, 150-seat chapel and atrium will be used for'Sunday services and could 34 be also used for community meetings or,special functions typical of churches, such as weddings. 35 The building will be placed at the front of the site, replacing the existing parking lot along 36 McDowell. Boulevard. The main entrance will be' turned toward a central covered courtyard 37 between the new Chapel and the existing church building to make access to the building easier 38 , from file central and rear parking areas and to minimize sound from worshipers gathering outside '39 before and after services. - 40 41 A 5,070 square foot social services and supplies building will be located:behind the .existing 42 residential structure. The building will'be used for general social services including transitional 43 housing and job counseling, utility assistance interviews, and grocery :distribution '(which • 44 includes delivery of food to the site and volunteer assembly of;bags of groceries — there will not 45 be any preparation or service of meals on the site). These services will occur during regular • 46 working hours throughout the week: Food will be distributed to needy families once a month; all Page 7' ' distribution will occur within the building. The building will include a large storage area for emergency supplies for disaster relief, storage of palletized food supplies for distribution to the 3 needy and indoor parkingfor.the Salvation Army mobile field canteen van. 4 5 A 5,153 square foot childcare center will be constructed at the rear of the lot, separated from the 6 social service building and church by a parking lot. A loop road will allow the picking up and 7 dropping off of children independently of other activities on the site The childcare center will 8 operate from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays. The" center will be state 9 licensed for,a maximum of 60 children, preschool age and younger, who will be cared for by 8 10 paid staff members. No more than 40 children will be cared for during the evening shift, with 11 peak attendance hours between 7:00 and 9:00 p.m. Two outside play areas are also provided — 12 one for toddlers and another for preschool-aged children. Outside playtime will be staggered to 13 reduce the number of children outside at one time Children will notbe outside before 10:00 a.m. 14 or after 6:00 p.m. during Pacific Standard Time or after '8:00 pm. during Pacific Daylight 15 Savings Time. 16 17 The existing church building will be remodeled and used for Sunday school and occasional 18 meetings. During the school year the Sunday school classrooms and Fellowship room will be 19 used for an after-school program for approximately 15-20 school-age children. This program 20 will end at 6:00 p.m. and will have 3-5 adults to supervise and assist with the children's 21 homework. 22 The existing southern driveway, which currently provides access to the single-family dwelling, is proposed to be widened to 24 feet and to be used for ingress and egress from the site. The 25 northern 12-foot wide driveway has been designed.for egress only. 26 27 A total of 50 off-street parking spaces are proposed to serve:the,development. Per Section 20-300 28 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance, parking for churches is based on the number of seats in the 29 chapel; in this case, 38 parking spaces are required fora 150-seat chapel. The Sunday school 30 classes proposed for the church structure are incidental to the chapel use and do not require 31 additional parking spaces. An,additional 10 off-street parking spaces are required for the social 32 service office uses; 5 spaces are required for the storage area; 3 spaces (1 of which must be 33 covered) are required for the residential use; and 8 spaces are required for the childcare center 34 (based on the number of full-time employees). Therefore, a total of 64 off-street parking spaces 35 would be required for the proposed development. However, Section 20-603 of the Petaluma 36 Zoning Ordinance allows the Planning Director to determine, prior to the granting of a 37 Conditional Use Permit, that a-25 percent reduction in the required off-street parking is allowable 38 if the typical use of the off-street parking facility would be staggered to such an,extent that the 39 reduced number of spaces would be adequate to serve all uses sharing the facility. It has been 40 determined that this project qualifies for the 25 percent reduction based on the proposed Master 41 Schedule of Operations provided by the applicant (See the Project Statement dated November 2, 42 2000, attached as Attachment 4). With the 25 percent reduction, a total o: 48 off-street parking 43 spaces would be required; 50 are provided. 44 A total of 23,059 square feet of building floor area, 50 parking spaces and associated landscape will occur on the site after.:all construction is completed. The project sponsors have indicated that • Page 3 1 the clonst development 'ill be phased; construction completed within one year. proceed as funding is obtained. It is hopeful that, • P 3 4 SETTING • • 5 6 The approximately two-acre site is located on McDowell Boulevard South ,(See Location Map 7 attached as Attachment 3), between Caulfield Lane and Sarkesian Drive. McDowell Boulevard is 8 classified as an arterial roadway, with a Level of Service (LOS) A in the Petaluma General Plan. 9 The site is currently developed with a church and-two single-family homes. The-remainder of the 10 site is undeveloped. 11 12 Single-family homes are located.to the northwest, behind and across McDowell,Boulevard from 13 the site A church also exists behind the,;site. To the east• is a senior citizen, low-income 14 apartment project. All public utilities currently serve the site or are available. 15 16 BACKGROUND 17 18 The existing facility on the site was previously the location for the Neighborhoed 'Church. 19 According-to Pastor.Gary Atwood, who was pastor from January 1996 to April2000,the church 20 was in operation-in Petaluma since 1956 and,'at various times, included Bible,School, aerobic 21 classes and weekly sessions of preschool-age children. Other typical auxiliary uses of a church 22 include weddings, funerals,group meetings and counseling services. 23 •24 In. July of 1974, the Petaluma Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to 25 remove the existing non-conforming status of the Neighborhood 'Church and to allow its 26 expansion. 27 • 28 Zoning Ordinance Section 26-511 states. "A use permit granted pursuant to the provisions of this 29 article shall run with the land and shall be valid for the successors in interest of the original 30 grantee". Therefore, when the Salvation Army purchased the site last year, they were permitted 31 to operate under the existing Use Permit. The only uses the Salvation Army'were allowed to 32 conduct were those ancillary to church activities. 33 34 The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) 35 It should be noted that The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 36 (RLUIPA); which was signed into law by President:Clinton on September 22,'2000,`applies to 37 this:project. In summary, the Act provides that: 38 • 39 . "No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a 40 manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a 41 person, including a religious assembly or institution, unless the • 42 government demonstrates that imposition of the burden on that person; 43 assembly, or institution— • 44 45 A. Is in furtherance of a compellinggovermnental interest; and - 4 • 6 B. Is; the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling 47 governmental interest," • Page 4 - 0 The Act further provides that=this rule is applicable in any case in?which "the substantial burden 3 is imposed in the implementation of a land use regulation or system of land use regulations,. 4 under which a government makes, or has in place, formal or informal procedures or practices 5 that permit the government to sinake individualized assessments of the proposed uses for the 6 property involved." This project involves the implementation of a land use regulation and an 7 assessment of the proposed uses for the subject property. 8 - 9 The City Attorney has provided staff with an opinion regarding the application of S. 2869 10 (RLUIPA), which has been attached to the Planning Commissioners' agenda summary 11 (Attachment 9). The City Attorney notes that the U.S. Supreme Court will likely ultimately 12 decide the constitutionality of the Act. Therefore, if the.Planning;Commission should decide to 13 make a determination to deny or restrict the Salvation Army's proposal, it is important to 14 carefully 1) document that the regulation,or determination does not impose a substantial burden 15 on religious exercise; 2) document that a compelling governmental interest is served by the 16 regulation or determination, and 3),document the lack of less restrictive means of furthering such 17 compelling interest. 18 19 STAFF ANALYSIS 20 21 General Plan Consistency: 41 The General Plan designation for the site is Public and Institutional, which permits churches, private and parochial schools and community service uses. 24 25 The proposal conforms to the requirements, intent, goals and policies of the General Plan. 26 Specifically, the project further implements the following General ,Plan goals, policies and 27 objectives: 28 29 Chapter 3, Objective (i). Upgrade,thequality•of public,:residential, commercial and industrial 30 development throughout the city. 31 Chapter 3, Objective (o). Encourage:adaptive re-use of vacant or underutilized structures. 32 Chapter 7, Goal 6. Address the childcare needs of Petaluma's working,parents. 33 Chapter 7, Objective (u). Encourage "all-day" care centers and private preschools to provide 34 facilities for year-around care;. 35 Chapter 9, Objective (d). Provide housing opportunities for persons of all economic levels. 36 Chapter 9, Objective (g). Improve the conditions of the city's existing.housing. 37 38 The Bicycle Plan was adopted by the City Council as a component of the General Plan. The 39 goals of the Bicycle Plan are: . 40 . . . 41 1. Create and maintain a safe, comprehensive and integrated bicycle and pedestrian system 42 throughout.the City. 43 2. Develop facilities,' policies and standards by which Petaluma and the surrounding 6 Planning Area can reduce auto-dependency, acknowledging that to do so will improve the livability of Petaluma and environs. 46 3. Ensure that the Bicycle Plan is implemented in a'tiniely fashion. Page 5 4. Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian access as part, of the initial planning and design 2 process for all development proposals and capital:improvementprojects. •. 3 • 4 The Petaluma,Bicycle Advisory Committee reviewed the project at their meeting of November 5 29, 2000. Their recommended conditions of approval are attached as Attachment 5. Staff • 6 reviewed, the recommendations and has incorporated those which have not been addressed by 7 other conditions of approval. Included in the conditions is the requirement,.for five covered 8 bicycle parking spaces. This requirement is based on revised Zoning Ordinance Section 20-301, 9 which requires that the number of bicycle parking spaces be a minimum of 10 percent of the to required automobile parking spaces. In addition, per revised Zoning Ordinance Section 20-1300, 11 one shower and five clothes lockers are required'to be provided for employees' use 12 13 Zoning District Consistency: 14 Sections 6-3401 and 6-409 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance lists religions and public.service 15 uses and child care centers as conditional uses intliie`R-1-6,500 zoning district. 16 17 The proposed structures meet or exceed the Zoning`Ordinance requirements for front, side and 18 rear yard setbacks and will be well within the allowable height limits. The current church parking 19 lot is at the front of the site The construction-of the new chapel at the front,of the lot will bring 20 the site into conformance with Zoning Ordinance. Sections 20-406, 20-408 and'20-412, which 21 prohibit parking lots.imrequired front yard setbacks, except for residential uses.. 22 23 As previously stated', under Section 20-300 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance, a total of 64 off- • 24 street parking spaces.would be required for all the proposed uses on the site., However, as 25 allowed by Zoning, Ordinance Section 20-603, a determination has been made that the project 26 qualifies for a 25 percent reduction in the required number of spaces because the typical use of 27 the off-Street parking facility would be:staggered to such an extent that the„reduced number of 28 spaces would be adequate to serve all uses sharing the facility. This determination was based on 29 the proposed Master Schedule of Operations,provided by the applicant (see page 5 of applicant's 30 Project Statement attached as Attachment 4). With the 25 percent reduction, a total.of 48 off- 31 street parking.spaceswould be required; 50 are provided. 32 33 Consistency:with Aii%' Other Adopted Plans: 34 Title I of the National Affordable Housing Act established the requirement that jurisdictions 35 submitting applications for direct assistance from the Department of Housing and Urban 36 Development (HUD) complete a five-year Consolidated Plan and update it every five years. 37 thereafter. The City of Petaluma adopted its first Consolidated Plan in .1995; the plan was 38 updated in May of2000. 39 . 40 The Consolidated Plan is a collaborative effort that establishes a vision for housing and • 41 community development projects and programs, Its •statutory, program goals, principally for 42 extremely low, low and moderate-income households are to 1) Provide' decent housing; 2) 43 Provide a suitable living environment; and 3) Expand Economic Opportunities. 44 45 The Salvation Army project, which includes transitional housing and job counseling and 46 childcare, implements the following priorities of Petaluma's Consolidated Plan II 2000.2005. 47 • Page 6 • • • Priority 2: Provision of rental'units for very-low and low-income residents, particularly • those units with supportive services. 3 • Priority 4: Promotion of housing°choices and opportunities. 4 • Priority 5: Provision of programs, projects, or facilities which enhance the community's 5 childcare capacity for low-income households, with particular focus on welfare-to-work. 6 • Priority 6: Provision of programs, projects, or facilities 'which provide job-related 7 assistance to low-income-persons. 8 9 Primary Issues: 10 Prior to noticing of the public hearing, concern was expressed by neighbors of the project 11 regarding compatibility of the Salvation Army church facility'with the surrounding residential 12 uses, because the facility is proposed to include food distribution, counseling services and 13 childcare. In particular, the concerns related to noise, glare from lighting, traffic, loss in property 14 values, the intrusion of homeless people and possible drug use, and personal safety. The 15 necessity for such a facility has also been questioned. (All letters, which were received prior to 16 the finalization of the plans and the sending of the public .notice, have been attached as 17 Attachment 6.) 18 19 The applicants held two community meetings on August 9 and 30, 2000, to obtain input from the 20 neighbors prior to finalization of the plans. (Notes from these meetings are included with the 21 Applicant's Project Statement•— Attachment 4.) The applicants recognized that the new facility • would impact the 'surrounding neighbors and consequently revised the plans several times in response to neighbors' concerns. Staff also required the submittal of a traffic study, acoustical 24 study and photometric report. These studies are also attached- to the Applicant's Project 25 Statement. A third meeting was held January 10, 2001, wherein the revised plans were reviewed 26 and the same topics were discussed, but,with less acrimony. 27 28 Noise: The project was designed to reduce the sound impact by ,locating the primary noise 29 generators — the parking areas, and childcare center - as far as possible from the property lines; 30 orienting the buildings to screen sound; and the use of landscaping to block sound. The Noise 31 Study prepared by Illingworth and Rodkin assessed the potential, noise impacts on the 32 surrounding residential uses from the proposed childcare :center a'd the parking lot. It was 33 determined that noise generated from vehicles within the parking lot would typically be below 34 the existing ambient noise levels. In addition, the worst case scenario of 28 preschoolers playing 35 near the residential property lines would not be expected to cause average'noise levels to exceed 36 the City's Municipal Code limit of 60 dBA on the;residential side of the existing wood property 37 line fences: However, because the noise from the children could still impact the neighbors, the 38 consultants proposed mitigation measures, which have been,included in the Mitigated Negative 39 Declaration (See Mitigation Measures 6, 7 and 8 in the Initial Study under Noise — Attachment 40 `10). 41 42 Liahtina: The Illumination Study and. Photometric Report prepared by an electrical engineer 43 with the firm of Winzler & Kelly offered two options for lighting within the project. The maximum illumination levels for both options were found to be less than 0.5 footcandle beyond the property line and immediately behind the light fixture. However, the lighting levels reached a 46 maximum of 4 footcandle immediately under the fixture. Section 22-304.1 of the Zoning • Page 7 a I Ordinance limits the maximum, illumination at ground level to 3 footcandle; a Mitigation • 2 Measure has been included to require a reduction in the illumination to be within the allowable 3 limit. (See Mitigation Measure 1 in the Initial Study under Visual Quality and=Aesthetics.) 4 5 Traffic: A Traffic Impact/Site Access Analysis was completed by Whitlock & Weinberger 6 Transportation. It was found that the proJect would be expected to increase the existing delay at 7 the intersection of McDowell Boulevard South and Caulfield Lane by 0.2 seconds. This would 8 allow the 'intersection to remain within the established thresholds and, therefore, the project 9 would not have a significant'impact on this intersection. The analysis also found that the existing 10 southbound left-turn lane on.McDowell can accommodate five vehicles, the estimated number'of 11 vehicles waiting in the left-turn lane was calculated at three vehicles. The project was not 12 expected to increase the number of vehicles in the turn lane and therefore, no significant impact 13 was identified. However, due to possible sight distance limitations for drivers caused by the 14 existing-median island on McDowell Boulevard South, a mitigation measure prohibiting left-turn 15 movements from the southerly driveway was recommended. (See Mitigation Measure 5 in the 16 Initial Study under Transportation/Traffic.) A peer review of the Traffic Study by Walt Laabs of 17 TJKM Transportation Consultants confirmed that the traffic generated by the-project would have 18 a less than significant impact (included`in Attachment 5). 19 20 Other Concerns: The Salvation Army formerly conducted food distribution and counseling 21 services at 628 Washington Street. Staff contacted the Petaluma Police Department to ascertain if 22 there were any problems with the facility at that,location. No reports were filed,with the Police 23 Department,of any problems with clients. In addition, as of the writing of this report; other than • 24 one report of a confidential nature, no police problems have occurred at the new location on 25 McDowell.BoulevardSouth. 26 27 The new social service center is proposed to serve families only. There will not be any service of 28 meals onsite nor will there be any homeless living facilities. Each family will obtain groceries on 29 a monthly basis; all distribution of provisions will be within the social service building. 30 31 Unfortunately, some neighbors erroneously contended that the Salvation Army'was operating a 32 day care center prior to obtaining appropriate permits. After investigation by:staf6, it was found 33 that the Salvation Army was not conducting a day care center; the children viewed on the site 34 were there with their'families for counseling or were part of a singing group playing outside prior 35 to practice. 36 37 Need for Services: Some of the neighbors have questioned whether the services to be provided 38 at the McDowell Boulevard site are necessary: Both the General Plan and Consolidated Plan 39 include;policies that support the counseling and childcare services. With regard to the'need for 40 childcare, the Salvation Army has submitted two newspaper articles, two letters from City of 4i Petaluma departments and.a letter from the Community Child Care Council of.Sonoma County, 42 which included information from the Sonoma County Child Care Needs Assessment done in 43 1999, that clocument the need for childcare for low income families (see Attachment 7). 44 45 According to "Hunger in Sonoma Comity: A Comprehensive Study of the People Seeking Food •' 46 Assistance" sponsored by the Redwood Empire Food Bank and the University of California • Page 8 • `• Cooperative Extension — Sonoma County; more than 3,7,000°.people are served monthly by the - Food Bank and its;agencies. Of these, 31% of the households have a job as`the primary source of 3 income and 47% are families with children.Forty percent of all recipients are children; 8 percent 4 are seniors: Between the last comprehensive study done.in 1986 and the current study, there has 5 been a 71. percent increase in the number of households assisted by food panties. Even though 6 the unemployment rate in Sonoma County has dropped from 7.1 percent during the 1992 7 recession to less than 3 percent in 1999, agencies report that the number of people seeking food 8 assistance on a monthly basis has not decreased. An Executive Summary of this report is , 9 attached as Attachment8. 10 11 PUBLIC COMMENTS 12 13 A notice of public hearing was published in the Argus Courier on January 24, 2001, and notices 14 were sent to residents and property owners within 300 feet of subject site. 15 16 As of the writing of this report, two.:neighbors contacted the Planning Department for additional 17 infouuation after receipt of the public notice. Both neighbors questioned the validity of the 18 traffic study. Due to their concerns; staff has requested that the applicant's traffic consultant.and 19 the City's traffic consultant, who conducted a peer review of the traffic study and concurred with 20 the findings, be present at the hearing-to,respond to questions. 21 0 DECISION TIMELINE 24 . This application was received by the Community Development Department on June 21', 2000. 25 The application was deemed complete on January 4, 2001. Pursuant to the terms of the Permit 26 Streamlining Act, a decision must be made within 180 days of the project being deemed 27 complete. Therefore, a final decision on the project should be made by the Planning Commission 28 by July 4, 2001. 29 30 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 31 32 Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial 33 Study of potential environmental impacts was prepared (Attachment 10). The potential for the 34 following significant impacts were identified: Temporary air quality, noise, visual quality and 35 aesthetics and transportation/traffic. Mitigation measures have been proposed and agreed to by 36 the applicant that will reduce potential impacts to less than significant. In addition, there is no 37 substantial evidence that supports a.fair argument that the project, as mitigated, would have a 38 significant effect on the environment. It is therefore recommended that.a Mitigated Negative 39 Declaration be adopted. . . 40 41 NOTICE OF ESTIMATED FEES,-DEDICATIONS, AND OTHER EXACTIONS 42 • Pursuant to Section 66020 Of the California Government Code, the applicant/developer has the statutory right to protest development fees, dedication and reservation requirements, and other 45 exactions included in this project approval, and listed as follows 46 Page 9 1 • sewer connection Contact Michael Ban,Engineering Manager . •r 2 3 • water connection @778-4392 for quotation • 4 Contact the Water Field!Office @778 -4392 for quotation. 5 • community facilities development 6 $19 888 ($.88 x 22,600 sq. ft;) 7 • storm drain $3,236 (15,663 sq. ft. new impervious surface x 0.20661) 8 • school facilities Contact the School.District @778-4621 9 • traffic mitigation To be deteiniined after review by Traffic 10 11 Consultant 12 13 ATTACHMENTS 14 15 Attachment 1: Findings for Approval 16 Attachment 2: Recommended Conditions of Approval 17 Attachment 3: Locationmap 18 Attachment 4: Applicant's Project Statement, including Master Schedule of Operations, 19 noise, traffic and photometric studies, and community meetingnotesi • 20 Attachment 5: Bicycle Committee, City departments' comments and City's consulting traffic 21 engineer's peer review letter 22 Attachment 6: Correspondence received 23 Attaclunent:7: Newspaper articles and letters confirming need for childcare services • 24 Attachment 8: Executive Summary of"Hunger-in Sonoma County: A Comprehensive Study 25 of the,People Seeking Food Assistance". 26 Attachment 9 Petaluma. City Attorney, Opinion Regarding the Religious Land Use and 27 Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000. 28 Attachment 10: Initial.Studyand Mitigated Negative Declaration 29 Attachment 11: Full Size Plans (Planning Commissioners only) 30 31 32 s:\planning\pc\reports\salvationarmyperpt 33 34 35 • • Page 10 ilpATTACHMENT 1 2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL 3 Salvation Army Petaluma Center Conditional Use Permit - 4 5 6 Mitigated Negative Declaration: 7 8 1. That based upon the Initial Study, potential impacts resulting from the project have been 9 identified. Mitigation measures have been proposed,.mid agreed to by the applicant as a 10 condition of project approval that will reduce potential impacts to less than significant. 11 In addition, there is no substantial evidence that supports a fair argument that the project, 12 as conditioned and mitigated, would have a significant effect on the environment. 13 14 2. That the project does not•have the potential to affect wildlife resources as defined in the 15 State Fish and Game Code, either individually or cumulatively, and is exempt from Fish 16 and Game filing fees because it is proposed on an existing developed site surrounded by 17 urban development with none of the resources as defined in the Code. 18 19 3. That the project is not located on a site listed on any Hazardous Waste Site.List compiled 20 by the State pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the California Government Code. III4. That the Planning Commission reviewed the Initial Study and considered public 23 comments before making°a recommendation on the-project. ' 24 . 25 5. That a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared to ensure compliance with the 26 adopted mitigation measures. 27 • 28 6, That the record of proceedings of the decision on-the project is available for public 29 review at the City of Petaluma Planning Division, City Hall,11 English Street, Petaluma, 30 California. - 31 32 Conditional Use Permit: . 33 34 1. That the project, as conditioned, will conform to the requirements and the intent of the 35 Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. Specifically, the proposal implements General 36 Plan Chapter 7, Goal 6 and Chapter 3, Objectives (i) and (o), Chapter 7, Objective (u) and 37 Chapter 9, Objectives (d) and (g). Zoning Ordinance Sections 6-401 and 6-409 38 conditionally permit public and quasi-public buildings and uses of an educational, 39 religious, or public service nature and day dare in the R-1-6,500 zoning district. The 40 standards for conditional uses under Zoning'Ordinance Section 21-300 were considered 41 in the review of this project. 42 40 2. That the use, as conditioned, will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Traffic, noise_and lighting studies assert that the project will 45 not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The architectural and Page 11 - 1 • sewer connection Contact Michael Ban,Engineering.Manager • 2 @778-4392 for quotation 3 • water connection Contact the Water Field Office 4 @,78-4392 for quotation. 5 • community facilities development 6 • storm drain 19;888 ($.88 x 22,600 sq. ft.) 7 $3;236 (15,663 sq. ft. new impervious surface x0.20661) 8 • school facilities Contact the School District @7,78-4621 9 • traffic mitigation To be determined after review by Traffic 10 10 1 Consultant 12 13 14 ATTACHMENTS 15 i6 Attachment 1: Findings for Approval 17 Attachment 2: Recommended Conditions of Approval 18 Attachment 3: Location map 19 Attachment 4: Applicant's Project Statement, including Master Schedule of Operations_, 20 noise, traffic and photometric studies, and community meeting notes: 21 Attaclmient 5: Bicycle Committee, City departments' continents and City's'consulting traffic • 22 engineer.'s;peer review letter 23 Attachment 6: Correspondence received 24 Attachment 7: Newspaper articles and letters confirming need for childcare services 25 Attachment 8: Executive Summary of"Hungerin Sonoma County: A Comprehensive Study 26 of the People Seeking Food Assistance". 27 Attachment 9: Petaluma City Attorney Opinion Regarding the Religious Land Use and 28 Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000. 29 Attachment 10: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 30 Attachment 11: Full Size Plans (Planning Commissioners only) 31 32 33 s:\planning 1pcGeports\salvationarmyperpt 34 35 • 36 Paee 10 • landscaping plans will be subject to the review and_ approval by the Site Plan and 2 . Architectural Review Committee-to ensure that the project will`be aesthetically pleasing. 3 4 3. The project implements the priorities of Me Consolidated Plan II, 2000-2005, adopted by 5 the City Council on May 15, 2000. 6 • • • Page 12 • I ATTACHMENT • 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • 3 Salvation Army Petaluma Center'Conditional Use Permit(CUP00014) • 4 721 South McDowell Boulevard 5 6 From the Planning Department 7 1. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is granted to allow construction of a 5,951 .square 8 foot, 1°50-seat;chapel; a 5,070 square foot social services and supplies building, a 5,153 9 square foot childcare center and associated parking and site improvements which?shall,be 10 substantially as shown on the revised plans, dated 11/20/00. The operation of the uses 11 shall be substantially as stated in the Applicant's Project Statement-revised 11/20/00. Any 12 significant change in the operation of the uses shall be subject to a Conditional Use 13 Permit modification. 14 15 2. Within five days of an approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the applicant shall submit 16 a check in the amount of $35.00 payable to the Sonoma County Clerk for the Notice of 17 Determination filing fee. 18 19 3. The applicants/developers shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of any of 20 its boards, commissions, agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or 21 proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers or employees to 22 attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of the project when such claim or action is 23 brought within the time period 'provided forin applicable.State andlor local statutes. The. . 24 City shall promptly notify the applicants/ developers of any such claim, action or 25 proceeding. The City shall coordinate'in the defense. Nothing contained in this condition . 26 shall prohibit;the City from participating'in a defense of any claim, action,.or proceeding 27 if the City bears its own attorney's fees and costs, and the City defends the'action good 28 faith. 29 - 30 Mitigation Measures 31 4. All earthwork, grading, trenching, back-filling and compaction operation ;shall, be 32 conducted in accordance wtth';the City's Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance'(Title 7, . 33 Chapter 17.31, of the Municipal Code 34 35 5. All public and/or-private improvements shall be subject to inspection by City staff for 36 compliance with theapproved Improvement Plans, prior to City acceptance. 37 38 6. The applicant shall submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by a registered 39 professional engineer an as integral part:of the grading plan. The Erosion and;Sediment 40 Control.Plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. and Planning - • 41 Director, prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The Plan shall 'include temporary 42 erosion control measures to be used during grading operations at the site to prevent 43 discharge of sediment and contaminants into the drainage system. The Erosion and 44 Sediment Control Plan:shall include the following measures as applicable. • 45 46 a. Material and equipment for implementation of erosion control measures shall be on 47 —site by October Is`. All grading activity shall be completed by October 15t, prior Page 13 • to the onset of the rainy season, with all disturbed; area stabilized, and, if applicable, revegetated by October 31". Upon approval by the Petaluma City - 3 Engineer; extensions .for- ;short-term grading may be allowed. Special erosion 4 control measures may be required by the City Engineer in conjunction with any 5 specially permitted rainy season grading. 6 7 7. All construction activities shall comply with the Uniform,Building Code regulations for 8 seismic safety (i.e., reinforcing perimeter and/or load bearing walls, bracing parapets, 9 etc.). 10 11 The applicant shall incorporate the following Best Management Practices into the construction and 12 improvement plans and clearly'indicate these provisions in the specifications. The construction 13 contractor shall incorporate these measures into the required erosion and sediment plan to limit 14 dust and exhaust emissions.during'constniction. 15 16 8. Grading and construction. equipment operated during construction activities shall be 17 properly muffled and maintained to minimize emissions. Equipment shall be turned off 18 when not in use. 19 20 9. Exposed soils shall be watered periodically during construction, a minimum of twice daily. 21 The frequency of watering shall be increased if wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Only 22 purchased City water or reclaimed water shall be used;for this purpose. Watering shall also occur on weekends and holidays when work is not in progress. ' 25 10. Construction sites involving earthwork shall provide for a gravel pad area consisting of an 26 impermeable liner'and drain rock at the construction entrance to clean mud and debris from 27 construction vehicles prior to entering the public roadways. Street surfaces in the vicinity 28 of the project shall be routinely swept and cleaned,of mud and dust carried,onto the street 29 by construction vehicles. 30 31 11. During excavation activities, haul trucks used to transport soil shall utilize tarps or other 32 similar covering devices to reduce dust emissions. ' - 33 • 34 13. Applicant shall designate.,a person with authority to require increased watering to monitor 35 the dust and erosion control program., The name and phone number shall be provided to 36 the City of Petaluma prior to issuance of building,pe wits. . 37 38 14. This development shall be subject to the City's storm.drainage impact fees to cover the 39 incremental impact/increase it will have on'the City's storm drainage system. 40 . - . 41 15. All grading activity shall be completed prior to the onset of the rainy season. All new 42 drainage facilities shall be in place and in operation at that time. Grading and excavation 43 activities shall not be. permitted during the rainy season. Extensions for grading and 44 drainage facilities work may be allowed in consultation with the Petaluma City Engineer, based on the sensitivity of the specific project area to erosion, sedimentation, and the effectiveness of temporary (rainy season) erosion measures to be implemented by the 47 applicant. Page 14 1 •2 16. Plans submitted at time of application for building permit shall include.provisions forstoiin 3 water runoff management. The submittal shall reflect installation of permanent signs at 4 drop inlets:if any, to the public storm drain system, which prohibit the-deposit of hazardous 5 materials into the system. 6 7 17. All construction activities shall be performed in a manner that minimizes the sediment 8 and/or pollutants enteringndirectly or indirectly into the storm drain system or,ground water. 9 The applicant shall incorporate the following provisions into the construction plans and • 10 specifications, to be verified by the Planning Department, prior to issuance of grading or 1.1 building,permits: 12 13 a) The applicant shall designate on the improvement plans construction staging 14 areas and areas for the, storage,of any hazardous materials (Le.?motor oil, fuels. 15 paints, etc.) to be used during construction..All construction staging areas shall be 16 IodatedJaway from any stream and adjacent drainage areas to prevent runoff from 17 construction areas from entering into the drainage system,,Areas designated for. 18 storage of hazardous materials shall include proper containment_features to prevent 19 contamination from entering drainage areas in the event of a spill or leak. 20 21 b) No debris, soil, sand, cement, concrete, or washings' thereof, or other 22 construction related materials or wastes; soil or petroleum products,or other organic, • ... 23 or earthen material shall be allowed to enter any drainage system. All discarded 24 material including washings and any accidental spills shall be removed and 25 disposed of at'an approved disposal site The applicant shall,designate appropriate 26 disposal methods and/or facilities on the construction plans or in the.specifications. • 27 28 18. The applicant shall submit a detailed grading;and drainage plan for review rand and approval 29 by the City Engineer and Planning Department prior to approval of any improvement 30 plans or the issuance of a grading permit. Project grading and all site drainage: 31 improvements shall 'be designed and constructed in conformance with the City of 32 Petaluma Engineering Department's "Standard Specifications," and with the Sonoma 33 County Water Agency's."Flood,Control Design Criteria," if applicable. Drainage plans 34 shall include supporting calculations of'storm drain and culvert size using acceptable 35 engineering methods: No lot-to-lotdrainage shall be permitted. Surface;runoff shall be 36 addressed within each individual lot and then conveyed to an appropriate storm drain 37 system. All hydrologic, hydraulic, and storm drain system design, if applicable, shall be. 38 subject to review and approval of the Sonoma County Water.Agency (SCWA), and the 39 City Engineer. • 40 • • • . • 41 19. All construction and operation activities shall comply with applicable Performance 42 Standards in the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance and Municipal.Code. 43 44 20. AIL construction activities shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m, Monday through 45 Friday and 9.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. on 'Saturdays. Construction shall be prohibited on 46 Sundays and all holidays recognized by the City of Petaluma, unless a permit is first 47 secured from the City Manager (or.:his/her designee) for additional hours. There will be • Page:15 • IIIno start up of machines; nor equipment prior to 8:00 'aim, Monday through Friday; no • 2 delivery of:materials nor equipment prior to 7:30 a.m nor past 5:00 p.m., Monday 3 through Friday; no servicing of equipment past 6:45 p.m., Monday through Friday. 4 • 5 21. All construction equipment powered by internal combustion equipment shall be properly 6 muffled and maintained to minimize. noise. Equipment shall be turned off when not in 7 use. 8 9 22. Construction maintenance, storage, and staging areas' for construction equipment shall 10 avoid proximity to residential areas to the maximum extent practicable. Stationary 11 construction equipment, such as compressors, mixers, etc., shall be placed away from 12 residential areas and/or provided with acoustical shielding.,Quiet construction equipment 13 shall be used when possible. . 14 15 23. The applicant shall designate a Project Manager with authority to implement the mitigation 16 measures who will be-,responsible for responding to any complaints from the neighborhood, 17 prior to issuance of a building/grading permit. The Project Manager shall determine the ' 18 cause of noise.complaints (e.g. starting too early, faulty-muffler, etc.) and shall take prompt 19 ' action to correct the problem. 20 24. Optimize the site plan to minimize adverse effects on the adjacent neighbors. Play areas for 0 3 preschoolers should be located as far away from the property line as feasible and the use of elevated play structures should be minimized. . 24 25 25. If windows are proposed on the rear of the building adjacent to the residences, these 26 windows should be kept closed during noisy indoor play periods. If complaints are 27 received, windows could be fixed closed. . 28 29 26. If noise complaints due to,outdoor play activity are received from neighbors once the center 30 is in operation, a secondary solid wood or masonry block wall shall be built either around 31 the play areas or parallel to the existing property line fences on the Salvation Army side of 32 the property line to attenuate noise. These walls should be built to a height which will block 33 the line of sight from the children in the play areas to the rear yards or outdoor use areas of 34 the residences, 35 36 27. All exterior lighting shall be directed onto the project site and access ways and shielded to 37 prevent glare and intrusion onto adjacent residential properties.Plans submitted for project 38 review and approval shall incorporate lighting plans, which reflect the location and design 39 .. of all exterior lighting proposed.In no case shall the maximum illumination at ground level 40 exceed 3 footcandle. - 41 42 28. Shade trees shall be incorporated along public streets and within parking areas in 43 conformance with the City's Site Plan and Architectural Review Guidelines to reduce glare and provide shade and screening. •Page 16 . 1 29. Architectural detail, lighting plans, landscaping plans, specifications on parking lotilayout • 2 and detailed site plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Site Plan and 3 Architectural Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 4 5 30. Fixtures providing,security lighting shall`be controlled by integral.photocells, set to turn the 6 fixture,onfrom dusk to dawn or when the light level falls below the preset threshold. All 7 other fixtures-shall be controlled by a universal 7-day time clock that can be programmed 8 for time of dayoperation. The lights shall be set to turn off at close of-business. 9 • 10 31. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of the City's Traffic Mitigation Fees. 11 Traffic Mitigation Fees,shall be calculated at the.time of issuance of a building peiluit and 12 shall be due and payable before final inspection of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 13 14 32. During non-working hours, open trenches and construction hazards within the•public.right- 15 of-way shall be provided with signage, flashers, and barricades approved by the Street • 16 Superintendent to•warn oncoming,:motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians of potential-safety 17 hazards. 1s 19 33. All road surfaces shall be restored to pre-project conditions after completion of any project- 20 related utility installation activities. All trench pavement.restoration within existing asphalt 21 streets shall a slurry seal. 22 •23 34. Frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the city's Street`Standards to 24 provide for safe access to and from the site Curb cuts, signing, and striping,ifapplicable, 25 shall be incorporated into the design as required by the City's traffic Engineer. 26 Improvement Or construction plans ;shall be subject to review and approval of thesTiaffic 27 Engineer prior to issuance of a grading or building permit. All street frontage 28 improvements shall be constructed to City standards and inspected by'City Inspectors prior 29 to final inspections or,acceptance of improvements. • 30 31 35. Appropriate signs shall-be.installed;at the southerly driveway to prohibit outbound'left-turn 32 movements onto'Mcbowell Boulevard South. 33 34 36. The project shall be subject to the payment of established City Special.Development Fees 35 as applicable, including: Park and Recreation. Land Improvements, ,:Sewer and" Water_ 36 connection, and Traffic Mitigation as,specified by City Resolution. 37 38 37. In order to ensure public safety and provide for police surveillance, all non-residential 39 buildings and public use areas ,shall have security alarms and provide motion or heat 40 sensitive security lighting to parking areas,'pedestrian pathways and areas of concealment 41 around the perimeter of each building. All parking areas and pedestrian pathways shall 42 provide visual access to the extent practicable from public streets and may require mirrors . 43 placed on an angle to be seen from the street or public right-of-way to provide visual access 44 to'areas of potential concealment: 45 46 38. Prior to.the;issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall,provide and maintain 47 current:emergency contact information oii file at the Police Department. • Page 17 • 39. The project,sponsor shall be required to pay for additional water and sewer connections as 3 established in the City's Special Development Fee handout. 4 5 40. Trenching for utilities and'irrigation shall be kept to as shallow a depth as practical, to 6 avoid disturbing potential subsurface resources. 7 8 41. For all construction activities,potential to uncover unknown:archaeological resources exist. 9 Should any artifacts, cultural remains, or potential resources be encountered during 10 construction activities, work in the area of the find shall cease and the construction i l contractor shall notify the Director:of Planning. Archaeological features include artifacts of 12 stone, shell, bone, or other natural materials. Association with artifacts includes hearths, 13 house floors, and dumps. Historic artifacts potentially include all by-products of human 14 land use greater than 50 years of age. Human burials, if encountered, require the 15 notification of the County Coroner in addition to the monitoring archaeologist. The City 16 shall consult with qualified cultural resource specialist to evaluate the find. If the suspected 17 remains arevdetermined to be potentially significant, all.work in the vicinity shall be halted 18 until mitigation measures are incorporated into the design, or the removal of the resource 19 has been accomplished in accordance with recommendations by the archaeologist. The 20 applicant shall comply with all mitigation recommendations of the archaeologist prior to 21 commencing work in the vicinity of the archaeological find. The applicant shall be SI responsible for all costs associated with consulting a cultural resource specialist and with implementation of mitigation measures. 24 25 42. The applicant shall be required to.obtain all required perinits from responsible agencies 26 and provide proof of compliance to the City prior to issuance of grading or building 27 permits or approval of improvement plans. 28 29 43. The applicant shall incorporate all applicable code provisions and required mitigation 30 measures and conditions. into the design and improvement plans and specifications for the 31 project._ 32 33 44. The applicant shall notify all employees, contractors, and agents involved in the project 34 implementation of the mitigation measures and conditions applicable to the project and 35 shall ensure compliance with such measures and conditions. Applicant shall notify all 36 assigns and transfers of the same. 37 38 45. The applicant shall designate a project manager with authority to implement all. 39 mitigation measures and conditions of approval and provide name, address, and phone 40 numbers to the City prior to issuance of any grading permits,and signed by the contractor 41 responsible for construction. . 42 43 46. Mitigation measures required during construction shall be listed as conditions on the • building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. 46 From the Bicycle Advisory Committee: Page 18 .. 1 47. A total of five covered bicycle parking places shall be provided throughout the • 2 development. • 3 4 • 48. One shower and five clothes lockers:shall be provided for employees' use. 5 6 49. Exterior seating at benches/tables for a minimum of 10 persons shall be provided 7 (calculated'at twice`the,amount of required b icycle parking). This.seating shall.also'serve as 8 an outdoor eating space for employees. 9 10 50. The owners/lessees shall provide a. simple one-page document to the City naming a 11 'designated'. `transportation coordinator" and describing specific incentives,for employees 12 and customers to walk/bicycle to the facility thereby encouraging alternatives to 'driving 13 cars to this facility. Examples include lending bicycles for short errands, monetary or other 14 rewards for not driving, etc. This documentation shall be received by the City prior to 15 issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy., 16 17 51. The development shall have on-site facilities for food storage, preparation and eating 18 acoess'iblerto all employees of all buildings. 19 20 52. Under no circumstances should any :pesticide/herbicide be applied in areas used by 21 pedestrians/bicyclists anywhere in this,project or the surrounding area without appropriate 22 signage. 23 24 53. This project shall utilize Best Management Practices regarding pesticide/herbicide use and 25 fully commit to Integrated Pest Management techniques for the protection of bicyclists and 26 pedestrians. 27 28 From the.Engineering'Department: 29 54. A 10-foot wide right-of-way dedication-to the City of Petaluma is required for the 100-foot 30 longportion of parcel street frontage. 31 • - 32 55. An executed private storm drain easement grant deed shall be obtainedfrom the adjacent 33 existing Petaluma Ecumenical Project (PEP) development (APN 007-570-029) located 34 southeasterly of the proposed project.•Note: A letter of intent dated 12/21100 to enter offer 35 the above-mentioned easement from PEP to the=Sal-vation Army is-on file with the City of 36 Petaluma Community Development Department. 37 38 56. Hydrology calculations for the proposed and existing storm drain system shall be submitted 39 to the Engineering Section for review: Additionally, the calculations should indicate that 40 the existing storm drain.facilities located on the PEP project are hydraulically capable of - 41 handling the increase`in peak stoini°water runoff based on the proposed site development. 42 Sonoma.County Water Agency standards should be used to perfo a the analysis. 43 44 57. All portions of broken, cracked or otherwise damaged sidewalk or driveway approaches • 45 located along the entire parcel frontage shall be replaced. 46 . • • Page 19 • 58. An •excavation pen-nit is required for all work within the public right-of-way including "sidewalks; driveway approaches, water supply and sewerage installations, etc. .3 4 59. All work within the public right-of-way shall conform to the City of Petaluma latest 5 standards, codes, policies, etc. 6 7 60. Lot to lot surface drainage and concentrated drainage of public sidewalks shall not occur. 8 9 From the.Water Department: - 10 61. The contractor shall submit GPM requirements needed for water connections. The project 11 will require a minimum of 1" service for domestic and minimum 1" service for irrigation. 12 13 From the Fire Marshal: (To avoid requests for subsequent submittals, please show or.note all Fire 14 Department requirements on plans submitted for building permit.) 15 16 CHILDCARE BUILDING: 17 62. The building shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the 18 Uniform Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, which will 19 notify the Fire Department.in the event of water flow. In addition, a local alarm shall be 20 provided on the exterior and interior of the building. 21 63. Fire alarm system shall be connected 'to a central station monitor that will notify the fire department in the event of an alarm. 24 . 25 64. This facility requires-an-annual.Fire Department permit for a commercial childcare facility. 26 The permit fee is $60.00 per-year and is due prior to occupancy approval and/or operation. 27 28 65. This facility shall meet the requirements in the 1998 California Uniform Fire Code Article 29 10 and inFPA72. 30 31 NEW CHAPEL AND EXISTING CHURCH: • - 32 66. Provide a KNOX BOX for Fire Department access. KNOX BOX shall contain keys or 33 access codes to buildings. 34 35 67. All curtains, drapes, hangings or other decorative material shall be flame retardant or 36 treated with an approved fire retardant chemical by a licensed State Fire Marshal 37 Applicator. 38 39 68. This business requires an annual Fire Department permit for Places of Assembly of less 40 than 300. The permitfee of$60.00-is due prior to occupancy approval and/or operation. 41 42 69. The buildings shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the 43 Uniform Fire Code and shall be provided with.central station alarm monitoring, which will 0 notify the Fie Department, in the event of water flow. In addition; a local alarm shall be provided on the exterior and interior of the building. 46 Page 20 • 1 70: A permit is required from the. Fire marshal for the installation or alteration of a fire • • 2 sprinkler system prior to the commencement of work. A minimum of two sets,of plans with 3 calculations is required to be submitted for;.review and approval. 4 5 71. Contractors installing underground fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and submit 6 two sets of plans.for approval prior to commencing,work. A hydrostatic test of 200 psi for • 7 two'hours is required prior to backfrll. All joints shall be visible at time of inspection. 8 Underground installations shall be flushed to Fire Department satisfaction prior to 9 connection to overhead. NOTE: Civil utility plans andlor other plans approved, or not, will 10 not be accepted in lieu of the above requirement. 11 12 72. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma City Water Department approval prior to charging onsite 13 underground water mains. 14 15 73. All contracts shall have a City business license and a workers' compensation certificate on 16 file with the Fire-Marshal's office. 17 18 74. Provide an approved automatic fire extinguishing system to protect all cooking equipment. 19 20 75. Fixed fire extinguishing systems shall be installed by a licensed contractor:'Contractor shall 21 obtain the required permit from, and submit two sets of plans for review by, the Fire 22 Marshal. Systems are subject to testing and inspection by the Fire-Marshal's office prior to. 23 acceptance. • 24 25 76. Fire alarmtsystem shall be connected to a central station monitor, which'will notify-the Fire 26 Department in the event of an alarm. 27 28 77. All required}fire lanes, in which no parking is allowed, shall be designated by painting 29 curbs red. Where no curbs exist, signs approved by the Fire Marshal shall be installed. 30 31 78. No combustible-construction above the foundation is allowed unless,an approved asphalt 32 surfaced road is provided to within 150,feet of the furthest point of,a structure,and the fire 33 hydrants have been tested, flushed, and are_in'service. • 34 35 79. Install fire `hydrants every 300 lineal feet. No structure or Fire Department sprinkler 36 connection shall;be in excess of 150 feet from a fire hydrant., 37 • 38 SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING: 39 • 80. The building shall•be protected by-an automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the 40 Uniform,Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, which 4i will notify the,Fire Department in the event of water flow. In addition, a local alarm shall 42 be provided on the exterior and interior of the building. • 43 44 81. Contractors installing underground fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and -submit ,� 45 two;,sets of plans for approval prior,to commencing work. A hydrostatic test of.200 psi for 46 two. hours is required prior to backfill. .All joints shall be visible at time of inspection. Page 21 • Underground installations shall be flushed to Fire Department satisfaction prior to 2 bonnectionto overhead. NOTE: Civil utility plans and/or other plans,approved, or not will - 3 not be accepted in lieu of the above requirement. 4 5 82. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma City Water Department approval prior to charging onsite 6 tmderground'water mains. - 7 8 83. All contracts shall have &City business license and a workers' compensation certificate on 9 file with the Fire Marshal's office. 10 11 84. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor that will notify the Fire 13 Department in the event of an alarm. 13 14 85. This plan has been reviewed with the information supplied; subsequent plan submittal for 15 review may be subject to additional requirements as plans are revised. 16 17 From the Transit Coordinator: 18 86. A transit stop sign (provided by the City), pole and bench per the attached specifications 19 shall be installed at the existing bus stop. 20 • • Page 22 Commercial / Industrial Building Permit Application S Site and Grading Plan Checklist City of Petaluma Community Development Department Engineering Section - . The following list of items represents Engineering Section requirements for any siteplanygrading plan, etc.•accompanying a commercial or industrial building/grading permit.application to the Building Department. Grading only underground utilities only or a combination of both can be submitted prior to building permits associated win-1,a structure but the following information will be required regardless of the type of permit application..Any improvement plans for off-site work within the public right of way required with a commercial or industrial project shall be designed in accordance with the latest "Improvement Plan Preparation Checklist" available from the Engineering Section. 1. Existing topography on City of Petaluma datum and reference source (Including adjacent parcels and street frontages) 2. Building pad elevation(s) 3. Finished floor elevation(s) • 4. Proposed site grading/finished spot grade elevations and finished con tours • 5. Finished surfaces (concrete, asphalt concrete, landscaped areas, etc:) 6. Surface drainage patterns (including adjacent parcels and street frontages). 7: Finished surface slopes and/or retaining walls • 8, Existing or new frontage improvements not associated with improvement plans ;(curb; gutter,sidewalk, fire hydrants, street lights, catch basins, etc.) 9. Driveway-aprons', travel ways and parking facilities 10. Sanitary sewer system (including type, slope and size of pipes and connection points) 11. Domestic and fire protection water system:(including type and size of services, meters, double check valve assemblies, etc. Refer to the City of Petaluma water system design and construction standards 800:series) _ 12. Storm drain:system (including type and,size of pipes and discharge locations) 13. Boundary information including property..line bearings and distances (reference source of boundary information shown). 14. Dimensions from property lines to existing and proposed structures 15. Existing and proposed easements 16. North arrow/written and bar scale 17. Erosion and sediment control plan. Storm water pollution prevention plan if required • The following notes shall be shown on all plans: • 1. All work within the public right`of way requires an excavation permit. • • i TX �,.. 'AA • wk 1 •'l S --'1.fft' 4 : 1 d July 1990. 3 „ ,, im' ig +' -, - z5 FMS” f DAYTECH INTRODUCES Daytech Mfg. Inc. OUR NEW "ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY , EASIER ACCESS BENCH'' -°r is.{{ f .J i L- • • --4., :•"--,:t--",-2,!,9122:-.-;-.�. t r a s -. oila : 3 ,• y' Y t' 4 :y. r. d s ,. r , '� y r FK ah '� Yv. '—b S ti ' ' 'ti GA jr y .� v ] ._` .rc 4.. a 1.1 t ,fi• R.a,:.. • Z MS `yti z N _x fi :-"-CF s. 1 Fi• a "t^r_Y� 4 ; t /' 'Ly 3 1. r.7.A.04 J. r 7l?i'18!atLalACi 4:.�< rl tr_t r.es S to aid Senior Clti ZenS and Handicapped - Designed h arm_ _ patrons . Our new "Easier P.ccess" bench is also environmentally friendly. - The slats on the bench are made with "Superwood" , a new product made from 100%Recycled Plastics. The boards are a consistent black color throughout and may be sanded. or planed to remove any graffiti carved into the • ' surf ace .'' • - Easy maintenance and repair help reduce costs . - - The tubular armrest provide a smooth round grip with no sharp 5 edges . They also deter' anyone from "sleeping" on the be:n.ches . - ' These benches provide a positive step towards saving the environment_ 22-7 Thorn �1;(%esyc c �..czhcerr/ rrk n! YY /1/2-7 • . /—r, d if -7 _ /-74 '7; ., Fat' (77e) 647 /769 —i -41 4174C1tHeAfT 3 . 1 21 - 1520 -1521 i 1 520 1 J4 I ) _ 1 JGL �.:f J ❑( z 151211463 • 1517 c 1515 1517/ 15121513 ¢ 1.,17 1516 1517' 15 16 n,1--k ] 1SL8 �' 1509 1.13 151.3. 15121513 1 12 'S1 r -5 1509 1509 150Q 1459 1512 1508 �h1 ■ .SIR 05 150411505 1504 1455 1505 1505 1 1509 1509 11509 n.^ • ,11.5n 1 1 4 ‘11 1`500 11 501 1 1i(-11-) i- 1451 a 1504 1505 1504 1505 1504 KN T 4 50 0 0 ;,4 n 47 1444 1443 445 1447 o • o o. o o ^ r> r` 14-43 L U) u`, J U) N- N 1444 1443 —� y J 4 9 w 1440 1439 - - PARK LANE 3- 1440 1439 1 144 0 o N o —�� r,.l 143°_ )436 1435 Z _ 45 1 ; 1444 1 445 -P m ^ Y 1432 1431 J 1 436 11 435 1',41 >; .1440 1441 Z 1440 1437 1 '1436 J 1431 c 1432 1431 1423 1427 c 37 1436 1437 ❑ 1436 ❑ e N q 471 w >- 4 3 �2 w' C 142411423 4Z° 1427 • 33 41E1 1432 1433 � 1432 a m I G 1423 a < 1424 1423 w _ c 11429 N 1428 _ ¢ — 1420 1141 r ' 9 a: 11211 128 1425' w 1 241 ^ 4 9 1415 1420 1419 Z_ W. .1428 1429 Un Y 4 - � = � 1416 I 25 1. 1424 1425 1424 11 . 15 1 416 1 41 5 7421„ 1411 14 1411 12 1142011421 1420 _ L 1412 1411 1417 140,1 0 0 1416 1417 1416 a.dl. 1413' 1--12 141 2 1 4',3 E L ' W -- - - N SIRE • 405 1409 1408 1409 1408, o o p p m Q r. 140` L 1404- 1405 404 1405' 404 405 in a In Qi 1401 y 1400 1401 \ 4U0 1401 400 j M ^ m° co JJ ! SITE- --�J SOUTH 1cDOWEL 4, N ? N O T.� C V Y^ ;V u= 1} // C _' O N. O n 0 - in 1341 3' 1340 N N N N n r. ro m r~i 133 1.337 3 1336 -0.,,i. 1'n 3 4 \ 14 1333 < `1332 n n " \a6 1333/ 324 \ t> 3 v o ti 3 3 1320 732j RAMONA LAN() 1.3291 m / 4 m n 7317 m , m a c n 1u2� ' 1324 o ''`''� 1329 n 324 \1'CA' 137.5 �� ¢ 1 320. ' ) to m 77 1 321 1321 im n 3 07 a o - 1320 13201321 Ln w 1305 1309 z 1316 r ^ H. 1316' 1 1 317 z ¢ �� - i _1316 . 1317 1316 1317 1304 1305 Z ,1�12 700 REGINA COURT I 3 13; 211313 n o 1312 1�1� 1312 1313 Ln us 1300 1301 1308 `M - i71: O8 1309 w _ I ' .��. a i'■ 1-308. 1309 w _ 1308 1309 9, m 1304 ^ 1 . 13Uh �i vim', z.- .° m 4 �O o o - 1304 w 130515, 11305 - 1304 13051 n J REYNOLDS 1300 \ 13001 ¢ 1301 13001 300 1301 1.100 1301) 1 N 1 Y1 1 1295 70�, ERESA COURT z c 1 29 61 1 29 7 u • N " 1295 9 ,297 n 'n 29d 259 < 1292 ry ° w �✓ 3 o i9 �.N t` 1294 c 93 1292 1 [93 a o' 1294 1295 o I I 2_J ❑ � 297 1288 < � ' 29R Lo n n / 1290 11291 Q 12Q �� o m 0 12401 1 i28JJ 12851128; 1294 1293 1 1 28F.'1 1287 . 1 4 �0� ^ z 1256 12851 1264 12E5 1 290 1 1289 1250 `a �' 282 . at < `RUN COURT I 1280 1251 1255 Al in 1.71 I I 14 2a- 128.1 1286 -` I 7R 1 ._ I -,2.7_n0� rre 2 Z a _ -1 777 77l , �o �- � 177,. _. 1.1-776 ,n • • LIEB MILLER se1;1 Planning Revised November 2, 2000 PROJECT: SALVATION ARMY PETALUMA CENTER 721 So. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954 AP #'007-570-028 APPLICANT: Salvation Army, Petaluma Corps 721 So. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954 CONTACTS: Wayne E. Miller, Architect • 707-763-6813 Lt. `Brian Hoover, Salvation Army Petaluma Corps • 707=769-0716 APPLICATION FOR MAJOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT STATEMENT CONTENTS • • 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT Page I 2. PROJECT.PHASING Page 1 3. SITE MAS I ER PLAN CONCEPT • Page 1 4. PROGRAM OPERATIONS Page 2 PROPOSED MASTER SCHEDULE OF OPERATIONS Page 5 5. COMMUNITY OUTREACH _ Page 6 6. TRAFFIC Page 10 7. PARKING Page 11 8. NOISE ABATEMENT - Page 11 9. PROJECT ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING Page • 13 ATTACHMENTS • • ON-SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS TABLE NOISE STUDY BY ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN TRAFFIC IMPACT/SITE ANALYSIS BY WHITLOCK.&WEINBERGER ILLUMINATION STUDY AND PHOTOMETRIC REPORT BY WINZLER &KE�L�(LY Wayne Edward Miller, Architect A.n-Ac / Richard S.Ueb,:Ph�ner One Bodega Avenue - - 1. SCOPE OF PROJECT - • The proposed Salvation Army Petaluma Center project will construct needed facilities for the variety of religious services, community assembly and social programs provided to the Petaluma .Community by the Salvation,Army's,Petaluma Corps. The project will consist of the remodel of the existing, church building recently purchased from the Christian.Missionary Alliance; the addition of a new Chapel for Sunday worship services and community assembly; the construction 'of a combined Social Services & Supplies Building which will house the various community outreach programs-.to the.poor provided by the Salvation Army and disaster,preparedness supplies; and the construction of a new Child Care Center to serve the needs of our community's modest income:=population and help insure the success,of the welfare reform. Additionally, the existing residence on site will be altered to provide better on,site parking°and access. The existing zoning for the site is,R-1 6500. Under the provisions of the zoning, ordinance, religious and public service uses are conditionally permitted under Article 21 and Section 26-500, 6-401 and child care is conditionally'permitted under 6-409. The site is.2 Gross Acres in site and 1.79 Acres after public easements have been deducted. 2. PROJECT`PHASING The Salvation Army is requesting approval of the overall concept of mixed uses on the • site Project plans call for the incremental build out of the project as funds are obtained. The currently envisioned priority orconstruction will be as follows: 1. Construction of site improvements, including: demolition of existing building, construction of subsurface drainage systems, utility extensions, access roads, parking lots and landscaping. 2. Construction of the new Social Services and Supplies Building. 3. Construction of the new'Child Care Building. 4. Construction of the new^Chapel and completion of the remodel of the existing church building. 3. SITE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT • The envisioned.,facility will provide a variety of'resources for the Petaluma Community throughout the week. These resources and services are discussed more thoroughly below in the Operations section of this statement. The proposed site plan reflects the need to separate the services for functional:and security reasons. • The Social Services and,Su lies"Building approximately 5,070 sf. has been located • Pp b> pP Y behind the existing residential structure and a new access driveway; road<and'parking lot Wayne Edward M filler,Architect Richard S.^lieb,Planner One'Bodega Avenue Petaluma:.CA 94952 - _ have been:designed to provide-easy access and exit. Transitional housing program counseling, food distribution and other intervention services which•occur.periodically • during.regular working,hours throughout the week will be located here. This building also includes a large storage area for•emergency supplies for disaster relief, storage of palletized food supplies for distribution to the needy, and-indoor parkinr for the Salvation Army mobile field canteen van. The Child Care Building; approximately 5,153 sf., has been located to the rear of the site separated from the social service and church function by a parking lot. A loop road has been created so that pick,up and drop off of children can happen independent of other activities on site This rear location also provides the needed outside play area with a sunny - • southern exposure. The.new Chapel and Atrium, approximately 5,951 sf„ will bring a much needed new appearance to the aging church facility. The Chapel will be used for Sunday services but can also function as a community meeting place. The main entrance has been turned • toward a central covered,courtyard between the,new Chapel,and the existing church building, making access,'to the building easier from the central and rear parking areas and minimizing the sound disruption from gathering and leaving worshipers. • Including the existing church structure and residence which will be retained, the total building floor area on site after all construction is completed will be approximately 23,059 sf. • . 4. PROGRAM OPERATIONS Overview of the Salvation Army Petaluma Corps Programs The Salvation Army's mission is well expressed in the motto "Heart to God, Hand to. Man", Through a variety of worship, learning and ongoing social service programs, the church works faithfully'to fulfill this mission in the community,.particularly in service of those community members with the fewest resources, such as single mothers and children, the elderly and those working to recover from difficult life circumstances. The Salvation • Army provides a much,needed privately funded safety et for our community's most vulnerable citizensin a time of reduced resources from governmental agencies. The Salvation Army has worked successfully with the City of Petaluma and COTS to create a transitional housing program that provides long-term, stable housing for families who have been homeless -- essential to their effort to move out and beyond shelters toward being self-supporting again. The Salvation Army not only helps place families in available transitional housing units, but also monitors and supports-the families move to independence through the PATH program whereby the Salvation.Army provides counseling, money management skills building, and assistance in finding and keeping employment. • In addition to the transitional housing and PATH program, the Salvation Army Petaluma Corps is available to provide a variety of interventions in times of persgnal crisis. Wayne Edward Miller, Architect Richard S.IS, Planner One Bodega Avenue Petaluma, CA 94952' 2 Voice: 707/763-6813 Fez:::707/763.7899 Currently the Salvation Army.Petaluma.Corps supports the community through a,prog_am of weekly collection and;distribution Of groceries to.families with insufficient income-to make it.on their own. In the new Petaluma Center, the supplementary food for the month • will be distributed once'a month, The Salvation army-provides vouchers to help low income people keep their utilities on, and buy needed prescription drugs and clothing: Each year at Christmas, the familiar bell ringers with the kettles raise money to:support families. The Salvation Army has regularly subsidized the purchase_of children's school clothing for low income families in conjunction with Mervyn's Department'Store. With the construction of the proposed Child Care Center, the Salvation Army will be able to provide another essential support service to those families working to move out of poverty and welfare toward self-sufficiency. A major obstacle for a single parent: attempting to.move off welfare is how to care for pre-school age children: Jobs,available to women (and men) in transition-are typically low paying, service sector jobs, frequently at off hours such as evening shifts. By providing affordable child care services at extended hours, the Salvation Army will provide this essential service not otherwise available.to many families in Petaluma. An additional'after school program serving school age children would utilize the Fellowship room and Sunday School classrooms iMthe remodeled'Church Adminstration Building. This program would:begin after school and end at 6p:ni. The Salvation Army is also here for the Petaluma community in times Of city=wide emergency or crisis,.The Salvation Army maintains a mobile canteen ready 24 hours a day to support relief workers in flood, earthquake and:fire conditions and,stores food, blankets and other supplies to be.used in emergency situations. The proposed Social.Services and • Supplies Building will be equipped to serve as an emergency services center, and the church and child care buildings will be available as emergency shelter. Church Sanctuary and Church Administration Operations Church operations are typical of Christian churches: Sunday and weekday worship services, Sunday school for adults and children, small group'bible study classes, music;and fellowship meetings. The buildings will be'used primarily on'Sundays with occasional use during the week. These building locus o f the worshiping community There•is during sure the never enough space available to the community for'small group meetings and community events. The,existing church building will be remodeled to create a fellowship hall and the new 150 seat chapel will provide,needed community:meeting space that can be used:by the neighborhood. Refer to the following master operations schedule-"for anticipated hours of operation. Social Services Operations The Social Services Building will be open:for use,from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m, Monday through Friday. This building will house,administrative offices, counseling and conference rooms, restrooms with showers for emergency workers and storage for the Disaster Relief Canteen Van, disaster relief supplies and palletized and frozen foods for food distribution, • to those in need'. There will be from 4 to 6 full and part-time staff people regularly occupying the building as well as occasional volunteers Who help sort and=distribute- Wayne'Fdwaid Miller, Architect Richard`S. tieb,Planner One Bodega Avenue Petaluma,CA-94952 Voice:707/763-6813-Fez:'707/763-7899 • _ ,�. clothing and food during the week. The holiday season will also bring additional volunteers to assist in donation solicitation and gift programs. One or two'weekly food:pickup runs in • the Salvation Ariny's,truck'will bring;food supplies to the building to be stored for distribution. Between 10 to 15 client families will visit the social services center daily for PATH program counseling and general social services. General social services include: emergency food and clothing distribution, the utility assistance program, prescription and clothing voucher distribution and crisis intervention services. Refer to the following master operations schedule;Jor anticipated hours of operation. Parking for the Social Services Center will be in the parking area between the Center and the existing residence on site. Overflow parking will use the rear lot area adjacent to the Church Administration Building. • Child Care Center Operations The Child Care Center will be State Licensed and will operate from 6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for the daytime shift and from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m`. for the evening shift, Monday through Saturday.,The center will be licensed for a maximum of 60 children. There wilt be 8 paid staff members per shift. There will be four classrooms: 1 infant (12 children, 0-1 yrs.); 1 toddler (15 children, 1-2 yrs.); and 2 pm-school age (28 children, 3- 5 yrs.). Drop-off and pick-up times will be staggered, but the greatest traffic is expected between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m.- and between 5:00 and 6`:00 p.m. and peak attendance expected • to be between 9:00 a.m and 4:00 p.m. The evening shift will vary between 20 and 40 children, with peak attendance hours between 7:00 and 900 pm. Drop-off will occur along the drop-off zone in front of the building. Each drop-off and pick-up is expected to take less than 5 minutes. Parents needing to spend more than 5 minutes in dropping off or picking up will be able to parkin the parking area between the Child Care Building and the Church Administration Building. • Infant and Toddler classes will have approximately`40 minutes and pre-school age children approximately 60 minutes outside each day'divided into two or three play periods, weather permitting. The Evening;shift will have one outside play period of 30 minutes after the evening meal time ends at 6:00 p.m. The children's use of the outside play areas will be staggered to reduce the number of children outside, usually one class£ata time (15 children), and two classes (28 children) being the maximum. Children will not be outside earlier than 10 a.m., nor later than 8:00 p.m. during Daylight Savings time, nor 6:00 p.m. during Pacific Standard Time Outside time for infants who are confined to chairs would be limited by weather and located under the covered patio area Toddlers have an outside play area restricted to their age group to the rear (Northeast) Older children will have their own play area to the Southeast abutting the rear of theladjacent church yard and the PEP senior housing project. • A typical outside play schedule might be as follows: Wayne Edward Miller,Architect Richard 5.Lieb, flamer One aodega Avenue Petaluma.CA 94952 . Pre-school 1 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. 14 Children, Southeast yard Pre-school 2 10:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. 14 Children, Southeast yard Infants 11:00 a.m. to 11:20 a.m. 6 - 12 Children, Covered Patio • Toddlers 11:20 a.m. to 11:40 a.m. 15 Children, Northeast yard Pre-school 1 '2.00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. 14 Children, Southeast yard Pre-school 2 2:30 p.m, to 3:00 p.m. 14 Children, Southeast yard Infants 3.00 p.m. to 3:20 p.m., 6 - 12 Children; Covered Patio Toddlers 3:20 p.m. to 3:40 p.m. 15 Children, Northeast yard Daylight Savings Time Only Toddlers 6:00 p.m. to 6:20 p.m. 15 Children, Northeast yard Pre-school 1 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. 14 Children, Southeast yard Pre-school 2 7:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. 14 Children, Southeast yard PROPOSED PILASTER SCHEDULE OF OPERATIONS SS = Social_Services Building; CC: = Child Care Building, CS = Church Sanctuary, CA = Church Administration Building Sunday - Sunday School I Worship Services: CS & CA, 9:00 a.m. - 12:30:p.m., 80 - 100 people. (150 people maximum seating capacity of sanctuary) - Occasional Sunday Night,Meeting: CA, 5:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m., 50 70people, 1 • meeting every other month. Monday - General.Social Services: SS, 9:00 a.m. 73:00 p.m., 10-15 people interspersed throughout day + volunteer traffic. - PATH (transitional housing),'Program Meetings: SS, 9:00;a.m. - 3:00 p.m., 10 - 15 people interspersed throughout day, by appointment. • - Child Care Program: CC, 6:00 a.m. - 5 p.m., 60 Children Maximum, 8 Adults - Child Care Extended Day: :CC, 5:00.p.m. - 10:00 p.m., 40 Children Average Peak, 4 Adults.. Tuesday , - Services: SS, 9:00 a.m. -3:00 p.m;,. 10-15 people:interspersed - General Sery throughout;day + volunteer traffic. - Assembly of Bags of Groceries for Distribution: SS, 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., 5 10 volunteers. - Child Care Program: CC,.6:00-a.m. 5 p.m., 60 Children Maximum, 8 Adults - 'Child Care Extended Day: CC, 5'00`p.m..- 10:00 p.m., 40 Children Average Peak, 4 Adults. Wednesday - General Social Services::SS, 9:00 a.m. --3:00 p.m., 10-15 people interspersed throughout day + volunteer traffic. - Church'Fellowship/ Bible Study: SS, 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m., 15.- 20 people. - Child Care Program: CC, 6:00 a.m. - 5 p.m:, 60,Children Maximum, 8 Adults - Child Care Extended Day: CC, 5:00p.m. - 10:00 p.m., 40 Children Average Wayne Edward Miller,.Architect Richard S.reeb,Planner One Bodega,Avenge Petaluma,.CA 94952 Peak 4 Adults. • Thursday General Social Services Closed, By-Appointment Only SS, 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. - Women's Prayer Fellowship: CA, 10:30 a.m. 12:00 p.m 5 - 10 people. - Child Care Program: CC, 6:00 a.m. - 5 p.m., 60 Children Maximum, 8 Adults - Child Care Extended Day CC, 5:00 p.m. - 2:00'a.m., 40 Children Average, 4 Adults. Friday - General Social Services / Utility Assistance: SS, 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Grocery Distribution: SS, 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., 10 - 15 people + 2 - 5 • volunteers. - Kids Programs: CA, 4:00:p.m. - 5:00 p.m., 15-20 children, 3 - 5 Adults. (No programs when school is out.) - PATH Program Meeting: SS, 5:00 p.m. 6:30 p.m., 20 -30 people, 10 -15 children. - Child Care-Program_: CC, 6:00 a.m. - 5 p.m., 60 Children Maximum, 8 Adults - Child Care Extended Day'. CC, .5:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., 40 Children Average Peak, 4 Adults. Saturday - No Regular Social Service Program. - Supply Deliveries: SS, 8:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. 2-4 people. - Cleaning and Maintenance of Buildings: CS, CA, CC, SS. • • - Child Care'Program: CC, 6:00 a.m. - 5 p.m., 60 Children.Maximum, 8 Adults - . Child Care Extended Day:'1 CC, 5:00 p.m. - 2:00 a.m., 40 Children Average, 4 Adults. 5. COMMUNITY OUTREACH • The Salvation Army Petaluma Corps spent over two years searching for a suitable site before locating the site ithas purchased from Christian Missionary Alliance Church on South McDowell Boulevard. During this period, this site was the only one available for sale in Petaluma which.would allow the construction of facilities needed for the integrated programs it will offer. Through COTS and the Opportunity Center, the City of Petaluma is able to reach the homeless. The mission and focus of the Petaluma Corps is on the next step on the way back to self-sufficiency: transitional housing and employment. The population served at this level are mainly families. This is why it was important to find a site away from the Opportunity Center in.a residential area. The site has always been underdeveloped and used as a church with little weekday use, and the surrounding neighbors have enjoyed a long period with little impact from the use of this property, not even at a level consistent with the surrounding residential uses. Buildable.sites are scarce in Petaluma, and City policy currently supports in-fill projects rather than expansion into the surrounding agriculturahland. Developmenfand • intensification of use of this site are inevitable. The Salvation.Army recognizes that the proposed development can not help but.impact the surrounding neighbors. Their goal from the outset has been to find ways to address the concerns of the neighbors, minimize the negative impact and create positive benefits for the neighborhood. Wayne Edward Miller,Architect Richard S.lieb,Planner One Bodega,Avenue - Capt. Brian Hoover, head of the Petaluma Corps, made it a point on more than one occasion to individually go to each surrounding neighbor to discuss the project and to • review the preliminary design concept with them. Initial feedback was favorable: However, some neighbors have come to feel that the development of the site will negatively impact their quality of life and have rallied opposition to the°project.:Capt. Hoover initiated'a neighborhood meeting and invited the neighborhood to.come and discuss the project with.Salvation Army Staff and the Architect. The first neighborhood' meeting was held on August 9, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. at the church. - At the first neighborhood meeting, the Architect emphasized that'while it was understood.that,there was opposition to any development on the site, that their job was to design a project which met the needs of the owners of the property and addressed the concerns of the neighbors. The Architect extended an invitation to the-neighbors-to voice their concerns in detail so that the design could be improved.'The,concerns of they neighbors which surfaced and the subsequent responses of the Architect"and rSalvation Army sare listed below. ▪ Child care andfamily social services are too intense and don't belong in a residential neighborhood. (Those neighbors closest to the location of the proposed Child.Care Center were most concerned about noise.) With rare exceptions, such as the new child care center in Redwood,Business Park, most of the child care facilities in Petaluma and most in surrounding communities are located in residential neighborhoods where, with appropriate guidelines, they coexist •. admirably. Many are operated from existing church facilities and use-Sunday school classrooms for weekday day care programs. • The presence of the•SalvationArmy in-the neighborhood would be.a `magnet" to the homeless population, causing them to hang out in the neighborhood. Providing service to the hardcore homeless is not the focus of the Salvation Army. programs. Serving families is Since moving to the site some months ago, the Salvation Army has continued its existing programs, including PATH,-food distribution and other social services from the existing church facility on site These are the same programs that the Salvation Army intends to continue to provide. Sinceimoving-to the site, there has been no influx:of loitering vagrants. People come, receive support services and then leave the site and area. • Neighborhood children would be exposed to homeless drug addicts and their residue (garbage, used needles, etc.)' . Since the Salvation Army has moved to the site the neighborhood has-sseen,no significant increase in drug or other criminal activity in the area This element is not drawn:to the,site because there is little there for which they have any.use. • The development would greatly increase traffic on their streets (Sarkesian • _ Caulfield, Park Lane.) Wayne Edward Miller,-Architect Richard,S.Lieb,;Plauner One'Bodega Avenue Petaluma,CA 94952 -. For a:response, seethe -Traffic section below. • Traffic in and out of the site would disrupt their lives. For a response, see the Traffic section below. • The Child Care Center will be too noisy and too close to their houses. The Child Carebuildingihas been placed to meet or exceed the separation distances for rear and side yards required by the-zoning ordinance. The key issue is noise. The building itself will not be a significant source of noise -- mechanical equipment will be located inside the°attic, and children will not be audible while inside the building. The original plan called for a parking lot serving the Child Care Facility to be located in the left rear corner of the site. After listening to the concerns of the neighbors surrounding this corner of the property; the,parking area was removed and the building moved closer to this corner. The outside play areas, the most likely sources for noise, were located to the south adjacent to.the Seventh Day Adventist Church and the PEP senior housing complex, who voiced no concern over this issue. Access of children to the play areas will be controlled to•minimize the number of children playing outside at any one time. Fast growing, tall-trees will be planted along the fence lines to act as visual and acoustical buffers between adjacent properties and the Child,Care Center. For a more • detailed discussion of play scheduling, see the Operations section above. For more information regarding noise abatement, see the Noise Abatement section below. For more information regarding landscaping, see the J andscaping section below. • The late hours of operation will be noisy and disruptive at night. This is a difficult issue, since finding child care services which will take children in the evening is very hard, and evening is often the time during which entry level employment positions can be found. The Salvation.Army feels that despite the evening hours of operation, the noise can be controlled and mitigated. They reduced their proposed hours of operation from Midnight to a 10 p.m. close, and will limit outside activities in the evening to.daylight hours to minimize noise and light intrusion. Parking for evening drop off and pick up of children will be monitored and restricted to the area directly in front of the building. • Tall parking lot lights will keep'the whole neighborhood awake at night. .The challenge isl to adequately light the Salvation Army Petaluma Center Site without "spillover" light onto adjacent properties: The approach taken for the lighting design is twofold: 1) control the color, intensity and direction of the light; and 2) turn fixtures off when they are not needed. The fixtures and controls needed to accomplish this are now • • readily available. The engineering firm of Winzier & Kelly was engaged to provide exterior lighting design and a photometric study evaluating the lighting design options to assure that Wayne Edward Miller,Architect Richard S.Lieb,Manner ' One Bodege Avenue re oao5o • design was adequately lighting.the Salvation Army site with minimal light reaching adjacent properties. The minimum illumination level (footcandles) for the parlting lots, driveways, walkways and other exterior areas of the Salvation Army Petaluma Center facility were established in accordance with the,Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) • guidelines and good engineering practices for this application, The=minimum lighting level to perfofm the defined tasks and provide a safe and secure environmentifor the users of this facility was determined to be 1-footcandle with lighting levels reaching a maximum of 4-footcandles immediately°under the fixture and at handicapped,walkways. Two design options were created. The-first option illumines the site using pole mounted fixtures approximately 12' above`grade with forward throw light pattern`lenses and back light shields. The second option uses-pole mounted fixtures for the parking lot and bollard lights (approximately 3' tall) and wall mounted lighting packs for driveways, walkways and areas near the-property line. Both approaches achieve the"desired:result- Option 1 has an average of 0.11 footcandles 10 feet beyond the property line. Option 2 has an average of 0.0 footcandles 10 feet beyond the property,line.'Only a six foot high . fence was`,assumed in evaluating the options- The proposed landscape,design, which includes trees planted along the fence lines surrounding the Child Care•Center, will • further screen adjacent properties from light-, For additional information, refer to the attached Illumination Study and Photometric Report prepared by Winzler& Kelly. • • Property values will fall. • This is an assertion which is impossible to predict or prove. While this is a'common fear, it is not one based in reality. In fact, the housing market is so tight, that•property • values have risen as much as 30% in the last year alone in some areas..Any negative effect on value is likely to be more than overshadowed by the strong upward pressure because of limited supply- Two realestateprofessionals familiar with the local housing market and values were invited to the second neighborhood meeting lb'respond to this concern. , • The Salvation Army has been providing child care without a licenser or,approval from the City. • Opposition to the project was fueled by a:misperception that the•Salvation Army had already commenced operating a child care-facility prior to obtaining a.use permit because children were seen playing in;the yard behind the church where play equipment had been provided- Given the,complexity of the project, the Salvation Armineeaed,to close escrow and occupy the property prior to the completion of the preliminary design process and the use permit process required for a change in intensity and use Because the Salvation Army is a church with worship and outreach services similar to other churches, their current activities,.are consistent-with the use permit previously granted to • the Christian Missionary Alliance Church, and the Salvation Army has been able to continue its operations on an interim basis under the existing use permit- The children • the neighbors observed playing on site were there with their parents,•who were;being counseled as part of the PATH program discussed above. Child care services have not • been provided. However, this.misperception and its circulation through the neighborhood uncorroborated by any inquiry to the Salvation Army, resulted ins Wayne Edward Miller,Architect Richard S.Lieb, Planner One BodegaAvenue .Petaluma. CA 94952 - • Voice:707/763-6813°Fax:.707/763-7899 9 neighborhood uncorroborated.b"y any inquiry to the Salvation Army, resulted in misunderstanding,.and "mistrust on the part of the neighborhood, which Capt. Hoover • has worked very,hard to,correct. A:second',neighborhood•;meeting was held on August 30, 2000 at'6:00 p:mat the site with.Salvation Army staff (Capt. Tina Hoover) and the Architect in attendance. Capt. Brian Hoover was unexpectedly unable to attend due to a delay in a return air flight. The Architect reviewed the design,changes made to the plans in response to the concerns voided in the first meeting. In the interim, the Salvation Army decided to-reduce the maximum seating in the proposed new chapel from 200 seats to 150 seats so that the onsite parking requirement could be reduced and,the parking area originally designed in the left rear corner of the site adjacent to the Child Care Center could be removed. The Architect attempted to explore various options with the neighbors, including operational and program management ideac that could mitigate impacts on the-surrounding property. Some of these ideas have been adopted-.and are;discussed in the Operations section above. For the most part, creative solutions were not forthcoming from.those.neighbors who were in attendance, and who remained generally opposed to-any development beyond the status quo: One option that was'offered by one of the neighbors was the possibility of locating the child care at the proposed HUB center rather than on:this site. Because there is no assurance the HUB project will be successful in acquiring the site, this option was deemed unfeasible by the Salvation.Army. 6. TRAF'I,IC Because of the additional'uses proposed for the site, there will be a change in traffic patterns to and from the•site. At present, there is one entrance located to the northern side of the property off McDowell Boulevard which.servestas the primary entrance to the property. There is another curb cut'at the southern property line which is not currently used The site master plan calls for the enlargement and development of this'southerly entrance as the primary entrance. The driveway and access road will be widened to allow for two directional traffic to and from the,central parking lot serving the Social Services Building. The greatest nuniberof trips will enter and exit from this driveway. The existing northerly curb cut will be retained as an exit only. A loop road will be,developed extending to the;rrar of the site to access the larger parking lot and the Child Care Center, allowing separate exiting for Child Care Center users during the week and Church goers on Sunday. At the recommendation of W-Trans, outbound left-turn movements will be'prohibited at the southerly driveway and appropriate signs will be installed at the driveway exit. • The traffic engineering firm of Whitlock& Weinberger Transportation, Inc. (W-Trans) was engaged to prepare a Traffic.Impact/ Site.Access,Analysis for the project.Allan G. Tilton, P.E., formerly the traffic engineer for the Cityof‘Petaluma, prepared the analysis. The report states: "Although the project demand and interactions at the project access driveways do not result ina,signifcant impact, there are sight distance limitations for motorists exiting the southerly driveway created by the median island within the transition area for the southbound left-turn pocket on McDowell Boulevard South. Therefore, it is Wayne Edward Miller,Architect Richard:S. Lid),Planner One Bodega Avenue • - Petaluma, CA 94952 Vnice.707/161-M111 Fn.707/761-7R99 1 0 driveway and that appropriate signs be installed at the driveway exit. Left-turn movements into the exit can be accommodated within the existing southbound left-turn • pocket at the McDowell Boulevard South! Caulfield Lane intersection... The-secondary "access driveway has good sight distance and will.operate adequately. There are.no - • 'mitigation measures recommended at this driveway." Refer to theattached report for additional:information. • 7. PARKING The zoning ordinance requires 64:parking spaces on site for all usesand areas-that are proposed -- assuming that no parking is shared by the proposed uses: The largest single requirement is 38 parking spaces required for the Church based upon a,seating capacity in. the chapel of 150 persons. The remaining;uses operating Monday through Saturday require 26 spaces per the Zoning Ordinance. Because the maximum demand for'worship parking . occurs on Sunday when the other uses are not,in operation, there is a clear.opportunity to share parking between the uses on site ;Section 20-603 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance provides-that, "When a common off-streetparking facility, located within (300) feet of the uses served,will.provide twenty (20) or moreparking=spaces, the total number of parking, spaces required for all uses served may reduced by-not more than twenty-five (25) percent°upon the obtaining of a use permit.'" Assuming that a full 25% reduction is granted, the=minimum number of required parking spaces would be 48 spaces. Fifty (50) spaces are proposed. • (Referto Attachment-A for Required Parking Computations.) TheSite Master Plan provides for 3 parking spaces at the residence plus 47 spaces • distributed around the site in three,parking-..areas: the first between the.existrngresidence and the new Social Services Building (which it primarily serves) having 12 parking spaces; the second between the Social Services Building and the Child Care Center having 23 spaces, 'which can serve the Church Building, the Social Services Building or the Child Care Building; the third parking area.is adjacent to the Child Care Building and provides 12 spaces for staff and drop-off parking , 8. NOISE ABATEMENT In the development of the Site Master Plan, care was taken to minimize.noise impact to the:surrounding residences. Three strategies where employed to reduce sound impact: the location of primary noise generators as fat as possible-from the property lines; building orientation and placement to screen sound;. and trees and fencing.to.block sound. • Automobile traffic will be a primary source of added noise. Locating•the primary entrance • and parking lot at the center of the Site and surrounding it with buildings was considered,as One option. This proved unworkable for several reasons: it increased the traffic impact on McDowell,street; it precluded good solar siting for passive heating for the buildings, particularly the Child Care Building and playground; and it created great inefficiencies in the flow of people. Creating theloop road and separate entrances and exits-proved the . most workable from a traffic point of viev. The parking areas have been'divided and • placed''`betweenrbuildings and,surrounded b.y trees, which lessons'both the sound and visual. . W ayne.Edward' ler,thrchi test. Richard'S.Lid?,.Planner One Bodega Avenue Petaluma;CA 94952 Voice:707/763-6813 Fax:707/753-7899. 11 placed between;buildings and surrounded by trees, which lessons both the sound and visual impact. The other likely primary sources of noise,are Sunday worship•services and children • playing in the play yard. These>are both occasional rather than continuous sources of sound.: The children''.s play yard.has been placed to the rear of.the site on the southerly side of the building to maximize sun exposure to the play area In addition, it places the play area adjacent.to therear,yard of the adjacent church property, which.is rarely used Eight foot high fences will.be used around the play,area along with tall growing trees to help shield the sound. The primary, entrance to the new Chapel will be located off a central • court between the Chapehand the existing church;building. Thus, increased sound caused by people talking or-gathering will be directed away from the perimeter of the site and towards the center of the site. At the request,of the Petaluma:Community Development Department, the acoustical engineering firm ofIllingworth`&.Rodkin, Inc. was;engaged to provide a noise study of the project. This report is attached to the project statement. The report summarizes that: "0 . • . . 1. :s r e. • 1 1 1. : , 11• - 1 . .1 • 1-.. 1- • 1. 91v residential property lines would not be expected to cause average noise levels to exceed the • • •- . 114' u ..1 •1. •e- . '11' .• •1 s :. 1- , • 1 . .I • I - .1° wood propertKline_fence. " (Note that 28 children playing outside is the worst-case scenario. Playground activity can be scheduled such.thatthe maximum number of children outside is one classroom, or 15 • children. See the discussion OP Child Care operations above.) The study acknowledged that the noise could impact adjacent'neighbors and suggested mitigation measures which will be implemented in the design process: - Locate the play areas.for pre-schoolers as far away from the residential property lines as possible and avoid tall climbing structures. The design as presented represents this. - Keep windows facing the closest adjacent residential properties closed. - If noise levels prove to be beyond acceptable levels after construction is completed and operations have commenced, additional sound attenuation could be achieved by constructing a masonry wall along the property line which blocks the "line:of sight" from the play areas.to the rear yards and outdoor use areas of the residences. The noise study further statesthat, •" -, - - -W•1 _ r 1 . ., • 1- 1 e'- . t - 1- 1. 1•• -v-. . - 1- . .-.1 1 1" -I • .1 • -1 • 11 - s • 1 I- •• • . - noise-lev eh During the brieff periods of peak n ra kinglo ivity noise enerated by ,•. Al . • II 1- . . 1'1 - • 1' 1-.• - . - 1f. - - 1' Y. 1' 1 . a '•1• • l 1• • ,',• • a -.1 1 - . -. •1• \• '- 1' --1 1 i1°- l - - • / Y ' 1 ••.1 • " 1• 1.�. ".1 1 1 I 1'. .II. t1- Wayne Edward Miller,Architect Richard 5:.lieb,Planner One Bodege Avenue - PetalumarCA 94952 _.„_-.. ._ 9 • 9. PROJECT ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPING The surrounding architecture is primarily one-story tract residential. The predominant finish materials include stucco and wood siding, brick veneer, and composition shingle roofing. The proposedSalvation Army Petaluma,Center buildings will •' be compatible with'the surrounding-residential architecture, w ile having their own distinc . hs h t character. All new structures will.be+one-story in-height, though somewhat taller than typical one story houses becauserof'their larger size Building heights conform to the.25' height=limitation for the zone. Each building is,unique, yet all will share'a:common pallet of materials and vocabulary of detailing to=give the project a campus-like feel. The. proposed finish materials include,fiber-reinforced cement shingles•and horizontal siding, translucent glazing panels, double-glazed fiberglass windows with divided lights, and composition shingle roofing. Roofsare simple hip roofs at 4 in 12 pitch, with deep • overhangs for the Social Services and Child Care Buildings to provide shade to the large windows.'Wherever possible, natural day lighting and ventilation will be used to reduce energy consumption and make the buildings more.habitable. Materials will be selected for their durability and use of renewable and recycled sources. The preliminary landscaping plan has been developed by Landscape Architect Louise Leff. New trees will be planted throughout the site to provide shade,for,the buildings, parking areas and play areas and to define'the main pedestrian path from the front to the rear of the site These include coast,redwood,crape myrtle, red maple and Chinese pistache species. Landscaping for the Child Care Center will include sodded'areas, hard- surface play areas, and play structures. •. • Sub- ittedon behalf of the Salvation Army Petaluma Corps Wayne E. Miller; Architect • • • Wayne Edward Miller, Architect Richard.S. Lieb, Palmer One Rodega Avenue Petaluma,,CA 94952 .. _ Voice:707/763-6813 Fax:707/763-7899 13 N E 7.4C C Y C ' CO L 2 . < .. 9 0 tn o m O 0. P ) o a` a : 0 jg h c co IS o p o u) m ro Q N .p a Ce C N0 m n om a - c o N a 0 U 2 n o pi a c' Y Ti. y j CO y U. a L.C > m E U '.0 ' N 0 0) 1O d N o e 'w o a .E o .c i- s v min 0 LL m o ry C c w -o ;a a. c t m 7 CC cc C .> N !C .CJ N 0 •p fa ra a 3 U N 0 'N a LL 3 C C r r •• r r V) Q Q 5 00 o W CO c m 0) O Cl N CO O ` N VI (O. N 0) h m O N N N N N m • Q N W 8 C C W W Z Z Z Z T U C p cc m < m 0 W • 0 U o N 0 E c m t o o N N '`Q N 6 o N , 0 0 ° '� E V Oa © _ z d m N C y E C C U (2 co C yN-) w N a N z.- ) m y ;0 m L. N I- 0 LL 0) N Z C ,y d U) 'CI V a I � 3 a a E w m m Ell d C a am `oam z my m m W J J > on Q 9 a 7 Q U J ¢ N a 07 G L C 'Z m y 2 m .: �Y' I1J p V 'N �.ct Q a. N m ~ o C U F V r Wm °og z E K � L 4 7e gain 0 in wz ,m ' v • SALVATION ARMY CENTER MASTER PLAN PETAL UMLA, :CALIFORNIA NOISE STUDY October 18, 2000 O • Prepared for: • Mr. Wayne Miller, AIA LTEB & !HILLER.ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING One Bodeoa .Av.eiiue • Petaluma, CA 94952 Prepared by: Fred M. Svinth, Assoc. AIA ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. Acoustics Air Qualify 85 Bolinas Road,Suite 11 Fairfax, CA 94930 (415) 49-5507 Job No.: 00-166 • • Introduction. • The purposes of this study is to assess the potential noiseiimpacts on surrounding land uses due to the proposed master plan of the Salvan'on Army Petaluma Center. This report includes a discussion of noise fundamentals, a description of the noise monitoring survey, an evaluation of the potential effects of the project, and a discussion of measures necessary to mitigate any potential adverse effects. The Salvation Army Petaluma Center in located at 721 South McDowell Boulevard. Surrounding land uses include.single',family residences to the west and north, a Jehovah Witness Church to the north, and Petaluma Ecumenical Projects (PEP) Housing to the east The Master Plan for the facility (See Figure 1) includes new Chapel,conneeted to the existing church building which will front on-S. McDowell'Blvd., a new garage attached to the existing house fronting on McDowell Blvd., a new Social Services/Storage Building behind the existing house, a new on- . site parking scheme, and a new-Child Care Center with associated outdoor play areas at the rear of the site. Usage information provided to I&R by the Salvation Army for the new facilities establishes that all activities associated with the new master plan, with the exception of children playing in the outdoor'play'areas and parking lot traffic, will be take place within new and existing buildings of the Center. Thereforethis report assesses,the potential noise impacts associated of the proposed Child Care facility and parking lot noise on the adjacent neighborhood. This assessment includes discussion,of noise fundamentals, a description of the existing noise • environment at the rear yards and outdoor areas of the neighboring land uses, a projection of the noise generated by activities at the proposed Child Care facility based on measurements of activities at a similar existing Child Care facilities, an evaluation of the potential effects of the project, and a discussion of measures necessary to mitigate potential adverse effects. Community Noise Fundamentals Noise may be defined as unwanted sound. Noise is usually objectionable because it is disturbing or annoying. The objectionable nature of sound could be caused by'its/Bich or its loudness. Pitch is the height or depth of atone or sound, depending on the relative rapidity (frequency) of the vibrations by which it is produced, Higher pitched signals.sound-louder to humans than sounds with a lower pitch. Loudness is intensity of sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the ear. Intensity may be compared with the height of an ocean wave in that it is a measure of the amplitude of the sound wave. In addition to the concepts of pitch and loudness, there are several noise measurement scales which are used to describe noise.in a particular location. A decibel (dB) is•a unit of measurement which indicates the relative amplitude of a sound. The zero on the decibel scale is•based on the lowest sound level that the healthy,-unimpaired human,ear can.detect. Sound levels in decibels are calculated on a,logarithmic basis An increase of 10 decibels represents a ten-fold increase in acoustic energy, while'20 decibels is 100 times more intense, 30 decibels is 1,000 times more intense, etc. There is a relationship between the subjective noisiness or loudness of a sound and • its intensity. Each tO decibel increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness over a fairly wide range of intensities. Technical terms are defined in Table 1 • I , . . . .„. . „ . .„... „ . . , . • . . Decibel, dB A Unit desciPbine the amplitude ofisounequalttalOitimes.the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured:to:the reference pressure, which is 20 micropascals (20' inicroncwtons per square meter). Frequency, HZ Thermibber ofcomplete pressure,fluctuationsTer.second above.and below atraosbhcricrpreSsu re. • A-Weighted Sound Level;-413 The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a'Souna level meter-using the A-weighting filter network. The A,vveighting filter de- emphasizes the very low and very high frequeney.cornponents.of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency.response:of the.huncan ear . and correlates ell with subjective reactions'to ricise. All sound levels in this repormare ATweighted, unless:reportcchothcrwise. L01, LI, L50, L90 The A-weidIsted noise levels that are exceeded 1%, 10°A..50%, and .90% or the time during the measurement period. Equivalent Noise Level Leg The average A-weighted noise level during the measurement period • Community Noise Eouivalent Level, CNEL Thu average A-wcisilitcd noise level during a 24 hour day obtained after addition of o decibels in the:evening from 700 pm to 1000 pm arid after:addition of 10 decibels to sound levels measured in thieni: • • • beb\ecn 1000.3pm and 7:00 am. • Day/Night Noise Level La, Thu avcrage,A,ixeightcd noise level during a 24 hour day, obtained after addition of 10 decibels to levels measurcd'in the night between 10:00 phi dnd 7:00 am. Lmin The maximum:and minimum A-\ eiglited noise level during the measurement peHod. Ambient Noise Level The.composite of ndise from all sourcesmear .and far. The norml or existing,leyel ,of enyironmental noise at asiVen location. Intrusive That noise which intrudes over and above the'existincPambient noise at :a givenlocatidn. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duratibn, frequency, and time of occurrence and tonal or • informational content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level. • • • Definitions 0.f Acoustical Terms Table 1 ILLINGWORTH& RODKIN, INC/4 COI(Sticril Eri,Qincurs • There are several methods ofcharacterizing sound. The most common,in California is the A- s weighted sound level or dBA. This scale gives,greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive Representative outdoor-and indoor noise levels in units of dBA are shown in Table 2. Because sound levels can varyarnarkedly over a short period of time, a method for describing either tilt average character of the sound or statistical behavior of the variations must be utilized. Most commonly, environmental sounds are described in terms of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events. This energy-equivalent sound/noise,descriptor is called Lq.. The most common averaging period • is hourly, but Leg can describe any series of noise events of arbitrary duration. The scientific instrument used to measure noise is the sound level meter. Sound level meters can accurately measure environmental noise levels to within about plus or minus 1 dBA. Various computer models are used to predict environmental noise levels from sources, such,as roadways and airports. The accuracy of the predicted models depends upon the distance the receptor is from the noise source. Close to the noise source, the models are accurate to within about plus or minus 1 to 2 dBA. • Since the sensitivity to noise increases during the evening and at night -- because excessive noise interferes with the ability to sleep -- 24-hour descriptors have been developed that incorporate artificial noise penalties added to quiet-time noise events. The Den 'Niglu Average Sound Level, L,,,, is a.measure of the cumtilativenoise exposure in a community, with a 10 dB addition to nocturnal (10:00 pm - 7.00 am) noise levels. • • • • • • A-Weighted • t a Given Distance Soun i Noise Environments ' Subjective From Noise Source •" Les el to '••. " Impression Decibels 14)) • Civil Defense Siren (100') 13)) Jet Takcoff(200') 170 Pain Threshold I It) Rock Music Concert Diesel Pile-Driver(100') (It) VeryLoud 90 Boiler Room Freight Cars (50') Printing Press Plant Pneumatic Drill (50') 1u Freeway..(.100') In Kitchen With Garbage Vacuum Cleaner (10'.) 7n Disposal Running Moderately Loud 60 Data Processing Center Ligh •Traffic(100') et) Depanmcnt Store • Large Transformer(200') 40 Private Business Office Quiet Soft Whisper(3') 30 Quiet Bedroom 21) Recording Studio Itl Threshold o0Hcnring .. • • 0 Typical Sound Levels Measured in the . Environment and Industry . Table 2. JLLJNGWORJ'H& RODKIN, /NC✓-lcnusiira!Engineers • 4 • • • • • • Regiilitory Background State of California The California Environmental'.Quality Act (CEQA) sets forth the following regarding significant effects in Append.x G: "A project will normally have a significant effect on the environment if it will (a) conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community where it is located, or (p) increase substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas.". General Plan Guidelines Noise and land use planning policies and guidelines are set forth in Chapter 11, "Community Health and Safety" of the City of Petaluma General Plan. The City's Land Use/Noise Compatibility standards are shown in Figure 1. Policy 25 directs the use of these noise and land use.standards. Policy 26 directs:a conservative application of the standards, Policy-27 requires "sound buffers'(particularly landscaped buffers), open space, or other mitigation-measures between residential areas and areas producing higher noise_levels such as freeways, commercial sites, and industrial developments to achieve the sound level reduction necessary-to produce noise compatible land uses." Program (23) establishes a series of directives detailing requirements for acoustical studies and noise mitigation treatments. Petaluma Noise Regulations City of Petaluma noise re_niialions are set forth in-Section 22-301 of,the Municipal Code. Section 22-301.3B further sets forth maximum exterior noise exposure levels. The ordinance generally establishes a maximum hourly average noise level (Leq) of 60 dBA, measured within public.orprivate open/outdoorspaces. Existing Noise Environment - To evaluate the existing noise environment at the rear yards of the single family homes and PEP housing I&R monitored ddise levels over a 24-hour period at one locatioh adjacent to the single family residences near the site of the northwestern children's play area (see Figure 1). The noise leveled measured at this site is representative of the noise exposure of all single family and PEP Housing adjacent to the proposed outdoor play areas. The hourly trend in noise levels.arthis site'includingthe energy equivalent noise level or.Leq, maximum and minimum noise levels (indicated Lmax and Lmin) and the noise level exceeded 1:0. 50 and 90 percent of the time (indicated'as L1'0, L50 and L90) - are shown on Chart 1, .attached. The Leq noise level is usually considered the average noise level, while the L50 is considered the median noise level and the L90 is considered • the background noise level. • 5 The average day-night noise level (Ldn) at measurement the site was 53 dBA. Average daytime noise levels (Leg) were found to range from 48 td 52 dBA, maximum daytime . noise levels ranged from 55 to 75 dBA with an average maximum level of•666 dBA;and average daytime background (L90) noise levels ranged from 46 and 49 dBA. • On-Site Noise Gener'ation Child Care Center Noise Generation The proposed hours of operation for the child care facilities are 6 a . between and 10. p m. Based on the information provided by Salvation Army Staff, we understand that the daily maximum number of children served by the facility will be as follows; . Infants (0-1 yrs) I2 Toddlers (1-2 yrs) . I5 Preschool (3-5 yrs) 28 Of these children, the toddlers and preschoolers will be outside playing 3 times daily plus an evening play time for both grcups. Neither group will be outside playing before 10 a m: or after $ p m in the summer or 6 p.m in the winter According to. Salvation.Army staff there would be no more than 28 children outside at any given time. • To establish an estimate of the noise levers expected to be generated during-outdoor play at the neighboring residences, l&R used previously measured data from obtained from studies'of similar child care facilities in the Bay Area. The noisiest childreii'in age groups served by the facility are expected to be the 3 to 5-year-olds (preschoolers). These children tend to concentrate their play around climbing • structures (if available) and ale quite vocal during theft play. Younger children tend to be considerably quieter. Based on a worst;case scenario with the maximum number of 28 preschoolers • .• centering their playing as close as 20 feet from the residential and/or PEP property line fences, we estimate the average noise level-(Leg)just inside a typical wooden property line fence during play to be between 58 to 60 dBA with maximum noise levels typically between 65 to 70 dBA atthe same distance. If elevated play structures are within/20 feet of property line fences maximum noise levels may occasionally reach 73 dBA during the loudest shouts from children on these structures. • Parkins Lot Generated Noise Noise generated by vehicles within the narking lot dropping off and picking up children at the Child Care-Center along with,other facility activities would include engine idle and start=ups along with door slams. After reviewing the draft Traffic Study for the project (9/26/00), I&R expects that noise levels .generated by-these • events-at adjacent land-uses would typically-be belolw the existing ambient noise levels. • 6 • During-the,brief periods;of peak parking lot activity noise generated.by-parking lot activity may be audible at the nearest. residences Generally, the duration of these noise sources is limited to a few seconds. Noise•generated during these relatively brief periods of activity are not expected to significantly increase the Lafl at the nearest noise , sensitive receptors or cause a substantial increase in existing noise levels. Noise Impact Evaluation Our worst case analysis, above,;has found that with 28 preschoolers playing near the bordering residential property lines would not be expected to cause average noise levels to exceed the City of Petaluma's municipal code limit of 60 dBA:on,the residential side of the existing wood property line fences' However based on the City's Noise Element policies` and CEQAguidelines', we recognize that noise from children's play could impact the neighbors. We also recognize that if windows were included i •the building that would face the existing residences, given Petaluma's mild climate, it is that noise generated by children playing inside the building Child Care-Building could annoy adjacent neighbors if windows are open. Based on this conclusion IB:R..proposes the follow mitigation measures be incorporated into the Master Plan. • Mitigation Measures: 1. Optimize the site plan to minimize adverse effects•on the adjacent neighbors. The play area for toddlers, the quietest children, appears to have been located correctly have been located adjacent to the nearest neighbor. Play areas for preschoolers should be located as for away from the property line as feasible, and the use of elevated play structures should be minimized. 2. If windows are proposed on the rear of the building adjacent to the residences, these windows should''oe kept closed during noisy indoor play periods. If • complaints are received, windows could be fixed'+closed. .3. If noise complaints dire to outdoor play activity are received from neighbors once the center is in operation, is a secondary solid wood or masonry block wall built • either around on the play areas or parallel to the existing property line fences on the Salvation Army side of the property line to attenuate noise. These walls should be built to a height which will block the line of sight from the play areas from children in the play areas to the rear yards or outdoor uses areas of the residences. Policy 27, in particular. requires sound butlers or other mitigation measures between residential • areas and areas,producing la gher noise levels. CEQA'Guidelines establish that a project would have anadversc.effect if it would cause a substantial temporary, periodic. or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. 7 . . ' Sound Pressure Leyel, dBA L., L..) „,., .C.. to ._,‘ a, 01 -.1 ■_1 Cs. 0 - ln 0 cri 0 LA .0 li, 0 Lt. al • 13.00:00 . - + I x • 14400:00 . . + • x X . • 15:00:00 . ' ..16:00:00 — ol 17:00:00 + I X• V'enl 3 u) • . 13:00:00 . ,X 0 3 . . •'''• . • . • ' . • , 00 Co , 19.00:00 +• i• x • , ' • to -= . LAS . . • .• " - . . m co . • ---• mat 20.00:00 . • + C )4' - , . ...., x -3 - ' : Ell r- . . , --r- 21 00.00 + t x x -• rc4 co . 24.iZ .7... c) c) C4) . c 22-0000 + 1 x x- C , co 0 ▪ 23:00:00 • + , o ,X .X. : — •—• :a -- '• > . ,-.. . I X X, ...e = — .... n• OW ' ..., .... 1 00.00 .. rt ,.., co 0 = CL •-•• 2.00:00 * • ..7 •• C imq• .-.- -- ' 6- 2 3.00:00 . + 1 x , . — ----- nom -- c-z . . . • H 40000 '+ < r rt. to r-i lg. X n -- .< rr7 ..... r„ ••••+ . F - X 4 co — - --- wei 0 (0▪CO , • ,,, , C7-7 O• 0 Z ...I 6:00:00 - z- -- 22 , , . , .-..- 70000 ' d- X X P = n 0 z s . 80000 x, i • , • . • • 9:00:00. r + i X a_ , . . 1000-00 11 -4: 1 X X • • 11.0000 0- - + x X . = - > 12:00:00 • - •+ x x • . . . . . . I If + I i• i.E X a• 11, . . . , r r r r r---. r r- ,. • .•0 1..n c — c _ - . . - . . . . • _ I OUT"' MOD-0 fetc ecUCe.lM } - ,,_ . )., .ice.e..�.�{ .�-: 1- �.,_____ _ V• I, mil ��, '<L. \ _. , `<,�,;,�. e -1 ay % a o as i - `n ono' �9 > m I L ; R., S �J tea'. a P 'am I t 3 o k _., <-7.\ i ' 1 C) ....x \ vp A ! ]c 0 . a CD tug a i 1 ___ . , , il L u E , 1._____ _ , aj I _� VI _ ® I . n n i . l' / . I I 3 CO 17 ao , 1 3 lini ! r— -- . < ... -- -- e 1 , D � •5.Z r____ ----.--N i 673' ; 1 '�' 3 • �,.,�.� „tea ---a --- a*n -, w . F' I i " l I 3 . • December 20, 2000 Mr. Wayne Miller w r tt a N S Leib Millet Architects One Bodea Avenue Petaluma, CA 94952 Amended Traffic Impact/Site Access Analysis for Salvation Army Church and Day Care Center at 721 McDowell Boulevard South in the City of Petaluma Dear Mr.,Mil ler; Whitlock& Weinberger'Transportation, Inc. (W-'Trans) has evaluated the anticipated:tftp generation and access conditions for a proposed Salvation Army Church and Child Day Care Centerinthe City of Petaluma. The project site is located north.of Caulfield Lane on the,east side of McDowell Boulevard South, The project as^proposed will provide an-additional 5,951 square-foot church together with a 5,153 square-foot child daycare center and a-5;070 square-foot-social service office. The site is currently;occupied by a 5,285 square-foot church building and a parsonage. The project uses proposed for this site are taken from the data provided in Attachment A, "On-Site Parking Requirements." The project is a community service development having two components, a church and a child day care. center. The trip'generation for the project was reviewed-based on trip generation research data for offices, churches and child day care centers (Land Uses 710, 560 and 565)contained'.in Trip Generation, The peak tripigeneration rate for the church component occurs during the weekend,while the chi Id day care center and and office have their peak trip generation during the weekday commute periods Since:the weekday peak hours typically have considerably higher volumes than'are present on a Sunday moniing when the church has its highest trip generation,the analysis of weekday peak conditions would be,expected to represent worst case conditions for the project. The trip generation.is summarized in Table 1: Table 1 WeekdayTriip:Gereration.Summary Land Use Units Daily A.m. Peak Hour • P.M. Peak'Flour Rate Total Rate Total Trips Trips Rate Total Trips Trips Trips Trips In Out Trips 'In Out Office. 5.070 ,26:60 133 3:42 17 15 2 1.49 7 1 6 Church Existing 5.285 '9.11 48 0.72 4 2 2 0:66 4 2 2 Church Addition, 5.951 9.11 54 0.72 4 2 2 0.66 4 2 2 Day Care Center 5.153 79.26 408. 12.71 65 35 30 13.20 68 32 36 Residence 1 du 9.5 7 10 0.75 1 0 1 1.01 1 L 0 TOTAL 653'- 91 ' 54 37 • 84 38 46 Source: Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Insfitute,of Transportation Engineers, 1997 All units in'ksf(1,000 square feet) except the residence, which is in dwelling units (du) The project plan was evaluated to determine the mostlikely"path that patrons will use to enter and leave the site The project plan identities'two access points to McDowell Boulevard South. The primary ull service • WHITLOCK `tWEINB_ ERGER TRANSPORTATION INC 509 Seventh Street, Suite 101 • Santa Rasa,CA 95401 -_(7071 542:9500 • FAX (7071 54219590' viewww tron..ccm •Mr. Wayne Miller Paget December 20, 2000 driveway access is proposed at the southerly project boundary, approximately 100 feet north of Caulfield Lane. The secondary driveway access is proposed as an egress only driveway adjaceofto the northerly project boundary and approximately-135 feet north of the southerly driveway. For the purposes of-this report the project trips were assigned to the north and south equally on McDowell Boulevard South. All entering project trips are projected to use the southerly driveway while departing trips to the north were assigned equally to both driveways andtrips'to the'south were assigned to the northerly driveway. The signalized intersection of McDowell Boulevard South/Caulfield Lane was evaluated based upon traffic counts obtained from the City of Petaluma to determine the impacts, if any,resulting from the development of this project. Copies of the level of:service calculations are enclosed. McDowell Boulevard South/ Caulfield Lane operates at LOS C during the p.m. peak hour with an average delay of 20.4 seconds and is expected to continue to operate at LOS C With development.of this project. The average delay would be expected to increase by only 02 seconds as a result of the project. The operational performance of the intersection will remain within established thresholds and the project will, therefore, have a less than significant impact. The project's potential impact on.the capacity of the southbound left-turn lane at McDowell Boulevard South/Caulfield Lane was evaluated. The existing left turn pocket is 100 feet long and can accommodate about five vehicles. Currently the design queue during the evening peak hour (the estimated number of • vehicles waiting in the left-turn pocket) was calculated at three vehicles. The design queue based upon Existing plus Project Condition traffic volumes remains unaltered at three vehicles. Design queues are included within the level of service calculations'. . Although the project demand and'inter actions at the project access driveways do not result in a significant impact,there are sight distance limitations for motorists exiting the southerly driveway created by the median island within the transition area for the southbound left-turn pocket on McDowell Boulevard South: Therefore,it is recommended that outbound left-turn movements be prohibited at southerly driveway and that appropriate signs be installed at the 'driveway exit. Left-turn movements into the site can be accommodated within the existing southbound left-turn pocket at McDowell Boulevard South/Caulfield Lane intersection. The secondary access driveway has good sightdistance`and will operate adequately. There are no mitigation measures recommended at this driveway. We appreciate your giving us the opportunity to assist with this project. Oegyp"t ESsloN.. Sincerely, �� OYD r/ gym• • �/ 1 ��IL e_ 1215 Z `` -I Ezp 930-04 Allan O. Tilton, P.E. _ AGTiagt ,r��T^jRAFF�r'O04, • 026P5T.Limed C OF CAt:\F • ILLUMINATION STUDY AND PHOTOMETRIC REPORT For 'SALVATION ARMY PETALUMA CENTER 721 South McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, California • • October 20, 2000 Ettir ES \0 lk a E013224 O m s (f) EXP.;TL/./ o V z r FCTR\GPas Winzler & Kelly 495"Tesconi.Circle • Santa Rosa, CA 95401 • • Salvation Arm)) Petalurna'C'enter • • Illuminance Study and Photometric Report . October 20, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1,0 Summary Page 2 2.0 Purpose Page 2 3.0 Approach Page 2 4.0 Analysis Page 4 5.0 Observations Page 4 APPENDIX A Site Plan - Photometric Study, Option 1 (Sheet 1 of 2. Site Plan—Photometric Study, Option 2 (Sheet..2 of 2) AGI Software Program Summary APPENDIX B Light Fixture, Pole and Lamp Catalog Cuts For Options 1 and 2. • • • • • Prepared by Winzler &Kdly Page 1 Project No.00-2308-06 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 • Salvation Army Petaluma.Center Illuminance Study and Photometric Report October 20;,2000 • 1 .0 SUMMARY Two options were considered for the Photometric Study (using ACI software for Lighting design) to provide niinirhum illumination'level..of1 footcandle for the parkinglot, driveways,walkways and outdoor areas, with an average of 4.1 footcandle level overall, The maximum illumination levels,:for both options, were calculated to be less than 0.5 footcandle beyond the'property line and immediatelybehind the light fixture. Option 1 was based on installing polemounted HPS fixtures at all locations. Forward throw light pattern type lenses and backlight shields were selected for fixtures located along or near the property line. This resulted in reducing light slipover beyond the property line. Further reduction inlightinglevels'will be realized due to the 6-foot high, solid wood fence and landscaping that will be installed at the periphery of the-facility: Option 2.was based on installing pole mounted HPS fixtures for the parking lot and using bollard lighting and HPS wall packs mounted on building walls for driveways, walkways and areas near the property line. . Both options will:provide.adequate illumination for the Salvation Army facilities with 5 minimum lighting impact to the adjoiningproperties. 2.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to determine the minimum,average, and maximum illumination level (footcandle)and the light distribution pattern in the parking lots, driveways, walkways and other exterior areas.of the Salvation Army Petaluma Center facility and especially at and beyond the property (fence) line, based on the type, location and mounting height of the selected light fixtures. 3.0 APPROACH The,minimum, illumination'level (footcandle), for the parking lots, driveways; walkways .and other exterior areas.of the Salvation Army Petaluma Center facility, were established in accordance with the Illuminating(Engineering Society (IES)guidelines,and good engineering practices for this applications. The minimum lighting level, to perform the defined tasks and,provide a safe and secure environment for the users of this facility, was determined to be 1-footcandle with a lighting levels reaching (maximum,of4-footcandle • at immediately under the fixture and-at handicapped walkways and play areas. Prepared by Winzler&:Kelly Page 2 ' Project No.00-2308-06 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 • Salvation Army Petaluma Center Illuminance Study,and.;,Photometric Report October 20, 2000 • Based on theproposed site layout, various outdoor lighting,Sources•and fixtures were evaluated to meet the needs of the facility, at a reasonable cost. High Pressure Sodium (HPS) lamps were selected for this application since they would provide the best overall performance. • • High light output (mean 80 lumens per watt) • Lower energy costs. • Moderate color rendition (Color Rendering Index of 10 to 3.0) • Long life (average rated life of 24,000 hours) Option 1: Rectilinear-arm-mounted, totally enclosed light fixtures with aluminum die cast housing, impact resistanfcleartempered glass and gasketed lens frame, were selected to provide a visually appealing, rugged,low cost, efficient unit with sharp cutoff characteristics for all outdoor areas. Various distribution patterns —wide, medium or narrow, are available to suit the specific application such,as parking lot or narrow driveways. Backlight shields were provided for all fixtures located along the perimeter of the property to reduce spillover. The fixtures will be mounted 12-foot above grade, using 10-foot high steel or aluminum square poles with a 2-foot high concrete base. The fixture spacing is about 40-foot on centers and is coordinated with the preliminary Site Development Plan. Actual pole spacing will be adjusted during final design, to match final site•conditions. Option 2: Rectilinear ann-mounted, totally enclosed light fixtures similar to that used for Option 1 above, were used for the parking lot. Bollard type HPS fixtures (approx. 3feet high were utilized for the driveways and areas adjacent to the property line fence. Wall pack luminaries with HPS lamps,vandal-proof guard and Texan' lens, were selected for mounting on building walls, at 8-feet above finished floor. Controls: Fixtures providing security lighting will be controlled by integral photocells, set to turn the fixture "On"from dusk to dawn or when the light level falls below the pre- set threshold. All other fixtures will be controlled by,means of a universal 7-day time clock that can be programmed for time of day operation. Time of operation for each day, can be individually programmed. The lights will be set to turnoff at close of business (to be determined based on the facilities operating schedule). • • Prepared by Winzler&,Kelly Page 3 Project No.00-2308-06 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Salvation Army Petaluma Center Illuminance Study and Photometric Report • October 20, 2000 S 4.0 ANALYSIS • The Advanced Graphical Interface for Lighting,(AGi),,3=D.graphical software program; was utilized to compute the point-by-point luminance levels for the SalvationAnmy Site. This software is widely used for both interior and exterior environments. AGI imports and exports CAD files in DXF format for ease of data exchange with the ptoject drawings. A copy of the Software summary is included in Appendix A. The AGlprogram generated a photometric plot,-showing point-by-point lighting levels .for the outdoors areas. Input parameters to the AGI program (fixture spacing,"lamp wattage, and fixture mounting height):were adjusted, in order to optimize+the•lighting levels and reduce•spillover on to the adjacent property. 5.0 OBSERVATIONS • Site Plan.Photometric Study—Option 1 and Option 2, showing type and+location of the various light fixtures, is-included in Appendix A. Security light fixtures are identified. Option l: A total.of 34 fixtures and poles are required to provide the design illumination 5 (1-footcandle minimum illumination) for the-exterior areas. The photometric study ' (point-to-point foot-candle levels) indicates that: • Parking Lot illumination Level: • Average 4.16 footcandle Maximum 18.8 footcandle directly under the fixtures Minimum 1.0 footcandle at the center of the parking:lot. Play Area on northeast side of the Child Care,Center, illumination Level: Average 3.21 footcandle Maximum 14.9 footcandle directly under the fixture. Minimum 0.3 footcandle at the far end of the play area. Spill Light (along the property line) Illumination Level: Average 0.11 footcandle Maximum 0.5 footcandle at approx 10.feet beyondthe,property line. Minimum 0.0 footcandle • The site-development plans include installation of a six feet high, solid'wood fence, laced with plantings, around the perimeter of the property. We estimate that this fence will Prepared by Wznzler & Kelly Page 4 Project No.00-2308=06 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 • Salvation Army Petaluma Center • Illuminance.Study andPhotonietric Report October 20, 2000 reduce the light spillover beyond the property line, to less than,0:_1 footcandle immediately behind the fixture.location. • Option 2: A total of 64 fixtures —9-pole mounted, 18 bollards and 37 wall packs, are required to provide the design illumination (1-footcandle minimum illumination) for the exterior areas. The photometric,study (point-to-point foot-candle levels) indicates that: Entire Area illumination level: Average 2.89 footcandle Maximum 35.9 footcandle directly under the fixture. Parking Lot illumination Level: Average 5.53 footcandle Maximum 18.50 footcandle directly under the fixture. Minimum 1.02 footcandle at the center of the parking lot. Driveway illumination Level: • Average 4.13 footcandle • Maximum 10.6 footcandle directly under the 'fixture. Minimum 1.07.footcandle at the far end of the play area. Spill Light (along the property line) Illumination Level: Average 0.0 footcandle Maximum 0.0 footcandle Minimum 0:0 footcandle - Representative Levels of illumination • Footcandle Starlight 0.0002 Moonlight 0:02 Street Light .0.6 to 1.8 • Daylight . At North Window 50—200 ' • In Shade (Outdoors) 100,- 1000 Direct Sunlight 5,000— 10,000 • Prepared byWinzler &Kelly Page 5 Project No.00-2308-06 • Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Salvation Army Petaluma Center Illuminance Study and Photometric Report October 20, 2000 • APPENDIX. A SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRIC STUDY - Option 1 SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRIC STUDY - Option 2 AGI SOFTWARE PROGRAM SUMMARY • • • • • • Preparea by WYiniler&Kelly Page 6 Project'No:00-2308-06 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 • RI l rr =CSr r r r r e - _ - r �ac�_q+ - r r. a r r r rr nni - nn; Cr, - C - mQmnrl I A , 5 C C C .. e C r CC C . . .. 1' r - C _ . C _ C . . r r n r C ml mmmamE I r C C C - r , r r .. a C r r n e cncRcF C r r - .c: r -' �u U<' C . S' Bggq�I • C L C C e o 01 C 5 • C n ° m N s G r, I. I. r o N . - r et- 3 S 4 N -. - C 6 .- . r = r ' E - 3 Y e -- ,n - e r . r r y e e . e C r' p a o g r r e s r _ e e e e r i t c e _ e _ r r - r e C - .- r . . - e t. Hi ^ 8Y - CI r . r r r r C C ✓ C - P F ° C C 93 r r d 't.' e C . C . .. ., .-. . .. . .. .. f' . r C . . tp� VII• I°- .. . r - Y— _ - '- C C — h'e _a ei IFrr i r r rr rerreecree z. m Cr s Cr rr —Iz Tr re O Z - K g {il, iC r . . . e . Z 5 > 5 PdFFt so . r . . - - C - - - C - - - e _ r �' �;eE h E v r r v r r r r r r r r r r -- > }$�iis O 9 r r r r r r e r r r r r r r r • ( 54 0 n !pLill °SJ ..Y. - Ii A FpF(l(f ..k.. _ fTIB 9p rill E, i 4011 . P 1 IN 1 L - 1 4H o IICI 1 4 a ' ti a y y j d W Y ff p 9. ° gY1b� x !111 1 oi9 1 5 i1..,141; 4 1Y'° 5 is xl . @*x 'CE • ,yY iS ' i•� a giL- fit 1 14 e P 2 , n1_;;; • 1 1tli!, ig i'S yls4 g u �. II1j i 4 a 3 xY o IP3 in. "3"1.. N' 1111 I 1 } s4 s Ili°." i - Rdli 3 a L 4..z, t .'x .3.; a hr.-- saaa5 t' �E. P .1!i. p 4-50s ee :� a °g. 16E°{8 .' 4'5x1 E 437712:^•s .-..r 6-E555.,.,,.,..94E{£74415 9 -Y'- £ s a„a•• ?a s 3x11 : :. 641 > L. •x{1i1._'..vi;;;: x Fees 7; ;5577.54ry^Rflig 1::.ERd...1Y:.:11.... a y,a S. 7' Pt! d : . ............e........e.e......ve.ao.......vee..e............6... i I 4 Y'- 1A fpYlYxYY.f.44Y8Y{o.4..Y44E144E88e3g4444yp.44".44-. .;48.4.4',119;!...mus a e'4 ytl' `In n e . P Y 4 ,J �8 u . Ay gx : . .•__ a g dG .1IESE .849-- "'p%g 8 'n4 a CG 8 gag QU Ei �+£ g : 5r i ` J• . q( 9 SB Y .1.e `" 47:.8` d el'A.x:8;;; ;EH'r1%£4„.11ee...YFbdC4Fx...x F...41,. 1 ^....E.3181:.. e.. g a'g Y {Ye •f• 1 a4 e i e is S 4: 1'54 ¢4 • 3 a. 1 Y.P: g- a e< :x: a ;g 1 1 1 47; ° six x e3 0 ill e3 ,,............,,....tlY Y Y i. 7 • yy” '8 4 yy 5 C . •.lE £ - ... .°- £x....G..,LGx..`.F...A.ea --.... 4.d.31S7:a4sR8.Y.. a 9 a E�4 le ..d°4 .f 444 v x 4 : 3liea ]]> . .3°3;55 x C I 9 I 9 9 9 9 S 3 3 9 ! a . 9 9 9' ' �... 9 9 9 :, ` g 9 1 Y gP a 5 Qq �. -.a., 9 9 1 4 Y Y1. Si! I 3 /. einio si m.,, 1Yma 9 1 1 9 9 9 1 P e @ae° 'g+S a YRnYin.e.msY 1 {OgRi l.14Y.AYiYYe� . i �'. i gg Y o1{wYUr:.RY ! 9 a a 4g g !e1 1; .,: Fd S� IwI�YYpp.� . s 3 9 3 £ 8 a 1 C g i@ 4 9 d Y4 .YmYYpYY 1� r p3 1 ! vat.b 3 1eY- P Fe 6 4 • vvR Yu.m, pp sP y @. ! e 8 5 ei 'lgev SY Sg 5 3 �mY_ o.mY'dmR • Rsa*� ° e . e a xE n 3 x 1 g°d' - u t 7 r Y e ® p 3 ! 3 4 a' S - -m .ice -em . . i pp & Y 3 a jY.m. mYOYGYYYrr7; . .\i I1 9 9�;! ° 1 A. aq a i gg g!g gp p4 _ 9 3 'ifiri YYiYY�tirlaY.mdYDZ�-s° 8. _3 ! . 1 £ -a 2: 3..3 .3 4- III 5&Y°�c-y 4eh° 1,1 ° II . 9e pperaa ®°1.�umanz ! , S s;9g a- Sr a 'i f4- .s .L-a '1 3ssh,_ va; e:. • , E., e �YW�ii IIIMIN v� Ym1eeCYdt3.I f I� _9 ar ® f -' I9 itw'! .. •C 9: 9. s 9 . ! 71 ' s F g 3 991 ! 3 a . • 4 9 SUR '55w ,p75 r ' as I• lily: • 8j'..a N£ 8 9 : 9 ! 9 9 a - !Zs 9 9 a g £- c ' � ' 9 S M I , in x igN m 99 .•; , ! 91 W. r i zs 4k� 1S I d r 5 . I a e' “ y 4 qe,` 4 . • 9 � d e si N,. 9 9 5 e 9 ■ rs ' ii — 1 r '.� 4 -Ca YGYmYmm°Yi Y11Ym��OJ' YY 1 ! ! Z r ".Sz4 ii .• YYY�YUmnu m- •rr : r mY o.in un 3 e °x? f Yu. e.„.m.a1:m.YC.nR►7 - r e M YmY{EYY4I.�{�,�YrA:2.EW - 9 9 1 P . ' Ym..LUe'ta1s�Y113.M'v.YYmIRi `J - Y Y'Y_ .RX.Y....1Y.. da7n.w pY.Y.�m�m aYr17p1p11�.�ms°mmm'YRmmc r Ili `C.7 9 �'-1 i.6_ Z €£ 5 i� 7aY ��J"�s!Y.''� ra NIYYRYY.UYi"a - a if a 1"0t4 �amRY.Ym.a9�YO�uYYYRRioYr eeC.••eeelll((( 3 9 9 �d ss ge 5 5 k manoNOmounsi si g „,- - h eg x.41• iligli 6mtl�n®YUBm®F1i h o NNE q Zia a r , ° of u.:,. M..mu..�em. `�l 9a�ad";�.1 I 3;g...,. ge5 a 51el e 53759 NB�Rli®B a 4 . LA1 agtaos rage J. or z AGI: the Advanced Graphical' Interface:for:lighting • AGI is a 3-D graphical software program capable of computing point-by-point illuminaocel(and more),for both interior and exterior environments using a single interface'and command structure.'Interior environments can be complex including rooms of most=any shape, partitions and sloped ceilings. Exterior environments can extend beyond your • imagination AGI also imports and exports CAD files in DXF format"for ease,of'data exchange with your project drawings. Easy and intuitive for projects both demanding and routine, AGI w_ill expand the lighting analysis capabilities of your business. 'This software is the first I have seen.that merits five stars;it meets all of the requirements from manuals to price to ability" Charles Troxell (19324998), llluminatinq Bytes,tD+A April 1994 Features Three dimensional Cad-like user interface Drag;-n-,drop all fighting entibes Large format digitizer support • Import:and export'DXF Outdoor and indoor point by point Indoor-room estimator(zonal cavity) • Reaoway luminance.per IES,CIE,CIE-AS Reads IES format photometric files English or Metric units • Integrated drawing tools Rooms of most any shape Multiple point grids Track separate statistical areas Sloped ceilings Objects with reflectance or transmittance Visibility switching for calculation grids Sloped calculation planes Calculation points.along a..line with elevations Flexible light meter aiming:(honz,vertical,TV) fso,illuminance;contour plots - Iso-illuminance templates for individual locations Unlimited number of luminaires Unlimitedinumber.of photometnadefiniUons Array, Mirror,Copy and Group luminaires minaire symbols library Comma+re switching - I AutoCalc feature its features:CV,UG and Max'spit Custom fixture:schedules w/smart text Three,internal fonts Import title blocks and logos ASCII import Plotter and laser support Internal archiving utility Internal batch processing • Shell command Hardware requirements Minimum Recommended , 486DX based computer • - Pentium based com'p'uter 16 Mb RAM 32 M6'RAM or better t VGA video.support Must support VGA(640x480 res) 1 • Mouse Mouse Dos,compatiible,printer ILaser_pnnter orlarge;format plotter Dos version 5 or any Windows version Large format digitizer - Windows NT Datasheet & demo Adobe PDF format (requires reader, 201k) • AGI dos datasheet MS-Word 7 format(zioped°242k) . Software order form Adobe PDF format(requires reader, 9k) • MS-Word 7 format(zipped 15k) Demonstration Self extracting zip-file, "Save-to Disk"with vourbrowser (470k) • • LAi agidos Page 2 of 2 Tech Support • Lighting Analysts directly supports.all AGl-dos software programs placed in North America from our.tittleton Colors. office. AGI-dos programs placed outside of North America are serviced by the,respective sellirig.distributors;in those territories. AGI-dos program users in North America please contact us as;follows: Email: Telephone: 303"972:8887 Facsimile:303:972':8851 hel p(e�lightinganalysts.com :Read the AGI-dos Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on=line or the FAQ in Acrobatformat. Windows 95, 98, NT.shortcut tinstructions in Adobe Acrobat format AGI-dos program history (Acrobat format).This includes an internal list of known bugs, fixed bugs and enhancements since version 2.60 of AGI-dos.'Beware, this is not light reading. This page Copyright() 1999 Lighting Analysts, Inc. • • • • http://www.lightinganalysts.com/agidos.htm www;lightinganalysts:com/agidos.htm 1;0/19/00 Salvation Army Petaluma,Center' • Illuminance Study find Photometric Report October 20;2000 APPENDIX B LIGHT FIXTURE, POLE AND LAMP .CATALOG CUTS FOR OPTIONS 1 AND 2 • • • Prepared by Win2'1er &:Kelly Page 7 Project.No.00-2308-06 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 . . --q• ' - t` ' 1-1/2“CLOSE POLE MOUNT ''.,(2,-.-•,-;.1..;°10-3,:i.31-ri"!•"--,•?(.11-h°1.•-. ;;;;-...?:::,tERIE --4..a,',.s.,:.::. RECTANGULAR AREA CUTOFF FLOOD :. .,- . - ,v-rt-7,;.. ' . - . ERA. RATING .z - Isofootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade. E.P.A. 0.60 for single,fixture with 0" tilt (Consult factory'lor E.P.A. rating on multiple units). , 82 60' 4a ,20' 0' 20' 42 so• 80. 80' 62 40' 20' 0' 20' 42 60' au 80' , 24.4 24.4 • 180'. iso° . • - • I ' I ., I 60' , • 18.3 ; 1 --!--1-• --!-- I . . 42 - : --,7,27-7•1=-2c , 122 1 !, , .1 __1 ) I h ( I IA • 20' ---!--II, , h!-: ,.. 1 6.1 )I I r-i-' ! 11 . I a., I. , 0 m 0 m ._... , , 1.:14!=...•. ' ., , 4000 . • ! - .., 1 . . I ! ! .. ... _.- 40' 122 42 , ' I , I I i -T H 1__ , . 62 ' 182 62 ---- --,------ --•--- - 18.3 6000 ..) . . I • I •• 0 • _. I • t . . -. • I .24.4 8000 a.• eo• • : ' - 24.4 Bo' • • • . ' 24.4 18.3 12_2 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 183 24.4 24.4 18.3 122 6.1 are 6.1 '12218224.4 • . • Lighting Sciences, Inc. Isofootcandle plot of 175W MH Area Certified Test Report No.LSI 10695 Cutoff Floodlight at 15"(4.6 m)mounting Isofootcandle plot of 175WMHArea Cutoff Floodlight at 20 (6.1,rn)mounting Candlepower distribution curve of 175W MH height vertical tilt with backlight beight.0°Vertical tilt with backlight Rectangular Area Cutoff Elbodlight,widi back- shield located for backlight cutoff. shield locatedjor backlight cutoff. light shield located for haeklight cutoff. (Plan view) (Plan vieW) . . , 82 60' 40. 20' 0' 20' 40' .60' 80' 80 60' 42 '20' 0' 20' 42 60'- 80' 80 1 _2. :26---- -1' •1201' 9•0.I_.-_, •1;, •I'I ' ...,!..!:;1 I II x •.,: - 24.4 I I :1 -I -- 60 Cr :- I 183 60 -- - 1erJ-7 1_11I 1_1 nI;, • 183 42 r 122 1 ` ' 12 2 ! I ` 1 1 20 20' • I I II (1. -I :- 1111 I • 27--•. - -----__:_f. ' . I . • ''' '1111 ir-- -12,.: 1 - 0 m • ..,. ....----F----_____H i ,. ., . _ .s . . . 22 22 7----c--, 1 40' , : 1 12.2 • 12.2 • , ! • ! ! ' ' 1 1 60 1 ' 18.3 60' _- 1 ' • I 182 24A 244 BO ' , . . - 244 16,3 122 6.1 Om 6.1 122 12.3 24.4 24.4,18212.2: 6.1 -Om 6.1 12.2 182 24.4 Lighting Sciences,Inc. Isofootcandle plot of 150W HPS Area Isolootcandle plot of-150W HPS Area . Certified Jest Report No.LSI 11233 Cutoff Floodlight at 15 (416rn)mounting Cutoff Floodlight ati26"(6.1th)mounting Candlepower distribution curve of 150W HPS height,0°Vertical,tilt with backlight height 0°vertical tilt,,with backlight Rectangular Area Cutoff Floodlight;with back- shield located for backlight ibtoff. . .shield located for backlight cutoff. light shield located for backlight cutoff. (Plan view) (Plan view) . . ... .-..s.. _ I---r---1 -r Pr• el • '' . Pole Spacing Example Data . LlsETA . . • Average Initial LighLevels at Grade . . Test arias centered/new e(16)pals Faro- 2 Fixtures per pale cO 180° Max.Recommended Pole Spacing (fretcarinies.2929•Lux) Catalog'# Lamp 7yz Lamp Lumens Mounting Height X x V Fothcandles LAC1410-D 100W MH 8,100 10'(3.0,m) 401(12 ml x 55'(16.7 m) •• 4.92 53 . " . 151(4.6 m) . 60'(18.3 m)x 85'1(25.9 it) 2,04 ' 22 LAC1417-M 175W MEI- 12.000 15'(416 rn) 50'(18:3 m)x65' (25.9 M) 3.01 . .32 20'(6.1 m) 75'(22.9 rn)x 110'(335m) 181 20 • ..._ - LAC1510-M 100W HPS 9,500 • 10'(3.0 m) 40'(12.1 m).x 55'(16.7 cm) ' 5.05 55 15'(4.6 m) 60'(18.3'm)Y x 85'(25.9 m) • 2408 22 L7C1515-M 150W HPS 16,000 15' (4.6'm) 60'(18.3 rn)x 85'(25.9 m) 3.51 38 20' (6.1 rti) 75' (22.9 m)x 110'(33.5 m) 211 23 . . 0 1 i RUUD. , . 1 9201 Washington Avenue, Racine,Wisconsin 53406-3772'U.S.A. . PHONE(414)886-1900 FAX(414),SP:4-3309 _ . • LIGHTING; , , 0 Ruud Lighting,Inc. Printed In USA. http://worw ruudlighting.COM ' 11/1/913 . _ - . • 1-1/2•CLOSE POLE MOUNT ' ,, v 41 LPR7t,:' , x r SERIESe 'RECTANGULAR PARKING/ROADWAY FLOOD aTrYJ`�y ms , >-,, Pulse-Rated.Porcelain ra `ti't � ,; � '4 -r f Ole sing Lampfioltler 7 al.,•P LrTVx9`f xxa) dyer ir,.n Aluminum Housing 17 r-- —1 - 4. ^ 4'?v y "• Finish colon-bronze -- _ - - gas n {.885 ip '".'q.'4 2 1, Lamp � a7ir w y. Dimensions (Included) t Dens'frame closed) i _ / I —'Reflector. 4'r 11'� 9.25'(235 mm)wx I Prallnished semi-specular 7 .'(13mm)x '� - = 1 fy , t 5.1'(130 mmjD .11C, 1 t - and diffuse aluminum. ar { ggg ` Ignttd) a ;I , J C- —HIgh.Power Factor g v r. (Where required) `\ y Ballast :34 {1.135.M.3-1,4#4444.1;._.ag 3 N j, > rye rC Capacitor-'tom _ °=�- -Pa tented Internal 3 a . ai __ —._ n Hinge Assembly ,afar t. e," t LR'<s ta.. t '-3 Lens Frame. i p it r Die"cast alurninum ' JPx _. _ ____-'_-__— _ -door frame;sealed ` --� 1 with silicone gasket. Close Pole Mount _-_Close--- I Finish 6016F-black: Side View Pole Mount. 1.5(38 mm)-. — Finish color-6ranze.L-Tempered I-Captive Lens Screw. (See side view) Glass Lens Black stainless steel. with silicone seal. .- .. 24- (610mm) 'r . long. 8 r r AGE , ,CATA1UG,# , w i'', la)11GL7AGESUFF4,0;- ', u - °@I OPTIGNS'lfae[orYUgallifi :°..2z 0` 0 i_______50W MH LPR1405-(a)(h),_ D— 120/277V(Standard 50-100W MH;SOW HPS) -(a)F FUsing_ _ _ -___ 70W MH .LPR1407 (a)(b) M 1201208/240/277V J Tamperproof Len5 Fasteners 100W MH LPR1410-(a)(6) _ (Standard:775W.MH 7C-150W HPS) -(a)P Button Photocell 175W MH LPR1417_(a)(b) T 120/277/347V(Canada Only) .-5P External Photocell(far 430v) , 35W HPS LPR1503-(a)(b) _--_ (Standard,70-175YJ MH_70150W.HPS) speedy(a)Single vintage-See Voltage Suffix Ney. 1 120V(Standard:35W HPS) • SOW HPS LPR1505r(3)07)' - __.------. _.- _...._...._...-.70W HPS .LPR1507-(a)(b) 2277V ------100W HPS LPR751O(a)(b) 3 208V .---- 150W HPS LPR1515;(a)(6) 4 _ NOV ---- -- 5 480V(125W MH;70-100W HPS) Specify(a)Voltage&(b)Options. 6 347V(Canada Only) . For voltage availability onside the U S.and Canada,see Bulletin TD-9 or contact your Ruud Lighting authorized Intl Distributor, Yd.CENERALOEscRIPTION' . ..` - mJ (: ,,"` rawilucaL r-'t ' &`a .•'{` , F a ._ zk` `.'" ,z Parking lot and roadway luminaire for HID lamp, Fixture includes clear,medium base lamp. Exclusive DeltaGuard'finish features an E Coar• -- totally enclosed.Supplied with IES Type Ill Pulse-rated porcelain enclosed,4kv'rated screw epoxy primer with medium bronze acrylic asymmetric distribution.pattern.Housing is. shell type`lampholder.Lamp,ignitor included powder topcoat. providing excellent resistance seamless, die cast aluminum.Mounting consists where required.AO ballast assemblies are high to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and of a 1.75'(44 mm) wide by 2.5'(64 mm) high power factor and use the following circuit.t pes: abrasion.The finish is covered by our 7 year by 1.5'(38 mm) long extruded aluminum arm. limited warranty. R_QaLIQr(120V only) The arm is held in place with two 3/8'(9•mm) (35--150W'HPS) mounting rods fastened jo a steel backing plate PA EN> : . ,; Inside the pole,and by two.nuts.inside the HX=High>_R @actance - fixture housing. Mounting,rods are provided (50 100W MH; 50-150W HPS) •- U.S. 4,689,729 with sealing washers to preven[,Water leakage. CWA—Constant Wattage Autotran[rmer _ . Lens assembly consists'of rigidhaluminum.frame (1j75W MH) pCCESSURIES - , ! and high impact, clear tempered glass. ' LsL• Poiycarbonate Vandal Shield __ • i x ,. LABELS t,r :% T 'r sBL-L Backhght5hield ANSI lamp wattage label supplied,visible during- TPS-1 Tamperproof Screwdriver_ relamping.UL Listed in U.S. and Canada for wet WG-L Wire Guard locations. • 9201 Washington Avenue Racine,,Wiscensin 53406-3772 USA. PHONE(41,4) 886-1900: _ FAX (414)884-3309 fl��inI • O Ruud Lighting.Inc. Printed in OS.0. hhpJhmw.ruudlighting.com 98 �I LIGHTING • „r • " n. `s4 LPR1 u i 1.112"CLOSE POLE MOUNT ` ` 4.SERIEL , . RECTANGULAR PARKING/ROADWAY FLOOD .�. w t 'r R,Bi - Et.A.A, RATING, Isotootcandle plots show initial footcandles at grade, • E.P.A. 0.60 for single.fixture with 0' tilt°{Consul(factory for E.P.A. rating on multiple units). . 80' 6a' 40' .20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 80 .60 do^ 'sa o zc m' ea'. ec 60' _ 24.4 ev, 24.4 150° 180•. '150' - I I ! I 60' - �. I LEI ._- 18.3 ' 1I ' 1204 (., f 6,1 ) i II, . . I I. 1 7 0m 0 1 li e 0m o' r -. '1 ,1 20' -Ir-f-i, (- ' 6.1 2a' I ,-F �I 6.1 40 r .2 40' j I _!___ 122 CO° so° 60' _-r- 1 - 18.3 60' __ . 18.3 80.. I 24.4 eo I 24.4 •30• 4000 .,._30:._ 24.4 16.3 122 6.1 On 6.1 12216224.4 244 182 12.2 8.1 0 61 12.2'18.3 24A Lighting Sciences, Inc. Isofootcandle plot of 175W MH ' Isofoot andle,plot of 175W'MH Certified Test Report No.,LS1 10691 Parking/Roadway Light at 15 x(4.6 m) Parking/ROadway;,Light at 20'(6.1',m) Candlepower distribution curve of 175W MH mounting'height and.0°vertical.tilt. mounting height and 0°vertical tilt. Rectangular Parking/Roadway'Light. (Plan view) (Plan view) , f SC° 180•. - 150° 80' I 244 80' L,. .':. 60' i 18.3 60 I- 18.3 120 120` 40' 1 I ___I - 122 40' !- 'I" 12.2 (�I f{.,�� 6.1 20' ic`�' �' I''I- Si • 1 11 1.' : : Om 0. '�f L If. ii' !Om • , 20'- tl I �-� /11 f 6.1. 20. L. 6.1 i • I S • I 1' 2000 . ! 4o �!-`- - - ,_ .122 40' _1 b -'ll 1z.2• pn 60 �, r [ 18.3 6G' -J-I__.-j.....-_--I_- 18.3 80. i I,: 24.4 60 'L. �. 24A . 30°. 4000 • 00` • 244 18.3 122 6.1 Om 6.1 12.2 182 24.4 24.4183 12.2 61 Om 6.1 12.2 18.3 24.4 Lighting Sciences„Inc, Isofootcandle plot of 150W'HPS Isofoatcandle.plotof 150W HPS Certified Test;Report No.LSI 10110 Parking/Roadway Light at 15(4.6 rip ParkingiRoadway,Light at 20'(6.1;m) Candlepowe'r distribution curve'.of 150W HPS mounting height and 0°,vertical tilt. mounting height and 0°vertical tilt. - .Rectangular parking/Roadway Light: (Plan•view) - (Plan view), a 1 I .x_r • Pole Spacing Example Data j g • I Average_Initial tight Levels at Grade 7es area Is centred whole a(15)Me laysa 2 Fixtures.per pale.(W 180° Max,-Recommended Pole'Spacing (Foetcandles 4 092•Lux),. Catalog.I Lamp Type Lamp Lumens Mounting Height X x Y Footcandles Lux _ LPR1410-0 • 100W MH'• 6,100 10"(3.O.m) 60'(18:3 m)x 40'(12.2m) - 5:94 68 15''(4.6.m) - 90'(27.4 m)x 60'(18.3 m) 2:48 _. 27 . LPR1417-M 175W MH ' • 12,000 15' (4.6 m) 90'(27.4 m)z':50'(18.3m) '3.69 40 20' (Si m) 120'(36.6.m)x80'(24.4`m) 2.01 "22 LPR1510-M 100W HPS: 9,500 , ' 10' (3.0 m) 60'(18.3.m)z°40'(12:2 m) 7.32: 79 • 15' (4,6m) 90' (27.4 m):x 60`(18,3 m) ',2,94 32 • LPR1S15-M 150WHPS. '16,000 15'(4.6m) 90'(27.4'.m):x 5J':'(18.3-m) 4.95 53 20':(6:1_:m) 120'.(36.6 m)x 80' (24.4.m) 2.64. 28. . 0 wU®. .9201 Washington Avenue' Racine,Wisconsin5_3406-3772-U.S.A. PHONE(414)886-1900 FAX.(414) 884-3309 1 LIGHTING, a Ruud Llghilng inc, Printed In ti.SA. httpolwvw,mudllghting,com 11/1/98 • rI0od 64 Ar°"' ea Accessories, . .wry . nz k- Aft , ei ."i'` ewe f7 xr.; r ,syk�a j i 5 t'•lr.yn. 1 `�' 3, ,Xf .. Y•'l' N 1 'pry] it I SI O 7 t• Ire ;. y _4 1 r1, 1 c `Y■ ,q i - r �ry. r n' v� v 4 ��" �'+ i7 _ �e�7 .. r r +- arlyr r 'iY "e {rh-H• a'a1-rA z ;.� I I i 1 ',Ill - � +, L l r rykr1 n c 0. i i v .- - Lpp 4 h -,9 °• f a r iv : r -=,�y,ryry 'y nv+,rt ., atrawfw.ra 0„, jV„� �a x r r 2 v °v.i 'fi. a ri� d, f oe.n 5 ., . . Infernal Louver Wire Guard Glare.Shield Deep Baffle Cal.( Housing Depth Dat,X Housing Depth Ceti( Housing Cato Housing GS-12 11' X' OL-12 12. fKG 12 12' ._- D3-12 12' 3.5 _. 76, Fn 1u 16' _.—_— GS-1 . 16 5 -.____ "'{ _--22-7 _' 08-22 1E _ -_5' DL-tfi_ __—____ _. _ _— GS-22 _-6_-.___—.__ 0842 22 65'' - - - ----- -- For PM and PH Series.Internal Louver Sled guard provides protection to Aluminum shield deters second story o n a For FS.PM and PH Series,Aluminum provides light pollution control and optical system of any outdoor or brightness and holds forward Con*Ia baffle allows precise control of light helps conceal Ine light source(reduces square commercial Mature with 12'or brightness to a minimum for eye-level =w direction while maintaining lull side brightness).- 16'housing.Attaches easily to lens fixture.Attaches easily to lens frame mr-. Irame with supplied/8lasteners. 'with supplied IS fasteners.Available Ufa we we cutoff. d IS to lens frame with Finished withanacr lic black supplied IS fasteners.Available for all . i for housing sizes.Finished with an D,my housing sizes.Finished with an acrylic - E coat paint.1'space between wires, acrylic black powder coal paint. black E-coat paint (Glare Shield is not recommended for ' the CF Series Cutoff Floodlight. Consult!apiary it use of Glare Shield with Polycarbonate Vandal Shield 7J is intended). C • C 2 �h ` R ' 5• 1s __,...,,41,....‘: -a . � i ' r*� A � 9, ..:- ... t , r S 4 Wt -r w s> C IY&r=l Y 4,{ 4 NNA • x "' f 305-1 ^3 ;a15 11:::‘,..1---t.'1''' '..,+ -y r r w ° 4 S• ` . I n TL f ,c ' ` 1,,,,,. — a 1 f . e. t lu !5 } n. . }U• F-^ . J - rist !f . i rl a+.,," t r �. L /1 C :Kix q 3, f 1,.a f y d ' 15 i a ?c } 1 la � I _ .,..,.;.:S,... `t` „ 5 e' \ t.' i i. ,... ' r •51117 r ,'2 l f d ` r ; a c N, '.- f ` 14 ,di ) ir li-a - F t_jhud x ate'-' .5 I s : , y � �y V� Y.v ,f t, y i 2r f VrKf `ti k qq .terli5 i . � -- i 5 , - H rICn�k e e u' Polycarbonate Vandal Shield Backlight Shield Button Photocell External Photocell This photocell is suitable for any This photocell is laclary installed and C) Cat.#LS-12 Housing Depth - Cat.if Housing: outdoor lixlure wit a 120,20E,240, must be ordered at the same time as 277.W/120V,V ballast{except - e 2'W x 1-1/2'H.ed) I(single me cures ballast will LS-12 12 __7____ SOL-12 12' voltage fixtures).A knockout is provided in Ih” 2 supplied) It measures 3-3/B'L x . .. . LS-16 16 2.5' SBL-16 16' __ 10G fixtures).A V,g trout is 1 provided adjustable window "" LS-22 22 __a5 _ _ --- .__22' ----- Z Adjustable Fitter to field-inslall the slide allows setting of early turn all/on. Clear pelycarhanale shield 0.111r-thick button-type photocell.There is no See product pages for pricing and For finis ed and AC fixtures This sensitivity adjustment.See product catalog numbers. provides protection to optical system providehed anodized aluminum shield of any size floodlight commercial, provides backlight cutoff for pages for pricing and catalog numbers. fixture.Attaches easily to lens frame .It mounts easil inside the with supplied 18 fasteners Consult fixture lens and can be position factory if use of P,olycarteoafe Vandal adjusted.Is available for all housing Shield with Glare'Shield.is intended. sizes(standard on the AC Series • (n/a on 1500W or it fixture is used In . Wall Mount). .- an uplight position) - • • • - I ,69 • _ " F , STEEL AND,ALUMINUM x- psjPa a4" -,-A �;? SQUARE POLES : > " s€aiEs ' Steel Pole I Aluminum Pole . s. ---Ppk Gp� ---POIe CaP� (Supplied Fl tenon (SUpplled ll tenon Is not ozea.) :+not uaea.); ea. i. ' i' Squi n,NOmbperad Pole__..__ Square.Non-tapered Pole — — il ii • i r. IIM �'x 15 Stay (st mm.isz mint t -- (sI "xuz mint :II-I .1 I Hand Bole Hand Hole T— ..._I Hand Hole cover 12 3 Two-piece Aluminum (305 mm-650 mm) I I (]0z Two-piece m-605 mm) Sue Male Cover Two-piece Steel I — Aluminum Angle ., l 11 s %'Bebe Pule Cover Ben Plm Slotted Anchor t II,r . BOn Hob ( L l - —<- \ .- Anchor. Carton Steel �'i '�. Bolt Hob'. r Baia Pleb . _.. . -.. SPEC,t, „ CATAL04`# t1 RQOSI " '" ''4 a e SWW1 ,a*' CATAILQGASI,-4,1PUEES1ZEss TL L':: .-,ca,+,-. , a'AM Square Steel Poles Square Aluminum.Poles H(Mx W(in)x Wall(in) H(m)x W(mm)a Well(mm) H(t)e W(in)x Wall rot _H(m)x W(mm)x Wall Man) PS3S10S(a)BZ 10 x 3'..x'.0:180 3.0 x 761x'5 PA3S10C(a)BZ 10x.3 x 0 125 3.0 x 76 x 3 PS3S155(a)BZ 15;x 3 x 0,180 4.6 x 76 x 5 PA3S15C(a)BZ 15 x 3 x'0`125 4.6:x 76 x 3 PS3519S(a)BZ 19 x 3 x 0 150 6.1 x 7615 PA4S15C(a)BZ 15'x 4,x 0125____4,5 x'102 x 3 -_._-PS4S10C(a)8Z .10'x'4 x 0.120 3.0 x 102 x 3 PA4S19D(a)BZ 19 x 4'x 0250 6.1 x-61276 6 PS4S15C(a)BZ 1St 4 x 0120 46 x 102 x 3 PA5S25D(a)BZ 25 15 x 0250 7.6 It 127 x 6 ^ __ _PS4S19C(a)BZ 19,x 4 x 0.120 5.1 x 102 x 3 PA6S300(a)BZ 30,x 6 x 0.250 91:x,152-x 6' . PS4S25C(a)BZ 25 x 4;x 0.120 7 6 x102 x3 , - __R545255(a)6Z 25 x 4.x.0.180 7.6 x102 xb , , rat-,: "as ins POL E,6ANFIGIIRA7I,ON' '�1. �>_ y. m�..' PS4S30S(a)BZ. 30 x 4.x0.180 9.1x'102 x 5 ): .e,.." -(� PS5S255(a)8Z 25-x 5 x 0.180; 7.6 x127 x 5 ■-a P555305(a)8Z 30 15 x 0.180 9.1 x.127rx5 1 '° 'Single Lect mountQ 5_° Triple(direct'mount) PS55355(a)BZ 35 x 5x0.180. 10.7x-127+x 5 2 °-a Twin 180°(direct mount) 6_°o Quad.(direct mount ' _ P565305(a)BZ 30 x 6.x.0.180 91 x.152.)(5 ' P565355(a)BZ 35 x 6 x 0.180 10:7 x152 x'5 3 0 Twin @ 90°(direct mount) T Tenon(order.tenon separately) PS6S40S(a)BZ 40 x 6 x 0.180 12.2 x-152i x'5 Far.fixtures-with Fixed 20'Mount.add prefix 2 to confgutation numner5' --— I.e.21.22.23,25 and 26. Specify(a)pale configuration. . �,.NY p ' F. 4hT 3.° .f*{c 1WOIROOs S., - . '. u +Exit ¢JP�xc" v'an'a .. ,'YF v-� "a-GEHAL"� IIRIk..x �- .a.'� w nm! w_!aa.it..Lt.,..3;'- ,- ..'Y ,1�n .r,1r° iM1. .,;t_ Non-tapered poles are supplied with welded Steel Poles Ruud Lighting square poles meet AASHTO base with cover,four galvanized anchor bolts, Square,non tapered pole of structural steel tubing standards for mechanical strength and wind masonite mounting template and a pole cap (ASTM A 500);with a minimum yield strength di loading In"the U.S., Ruud Lighting square poles (except.Tenon Mount) Each-:bolt is,provided 46,000 p.s.i.Welded to a carbon steel base plate are classified!by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.. with two washers and two nuts.Steel pole base with a minimum yield strength of 36,000 p.s:i.: for electrical,ground bonding; in Canada, they has slotted holes,aluminum base has standard are CSA'certified'for electrical ground bonding Aluminum-Poles stru holes. Per National Electrical Code requirements, and.structural.strength. Square,non-tapered-pale of extruded aluminum. pole is standard lco with a2' (51 305-x 61 (152 mm) (6063-T6);with minimum yield strength of e� :*35 a m i 7rirr-i hand hole, located 12' 24`(305-610-mm) 25,000ctus i. Welded to angle elate fabricated with a Catal 4'RE AC ,URY a _;KV;r � 25 000'ps.l.Weldeg to a base plate fabricated above bottom of pole.base.A#10.32 stainless og, C-GFIBZ • steel weld stud with grounding lug is located minimum yield strength of 30,000 psi._ (120V) inside pole,apposite hand bole;ahlandhole - - For alfpolesfexcept_5' cover is qupplied.bLt shippedseparately. For NtFmta1 1. , t' e,, (127 mm)and 5' (152 mm) E.P.A. ratios,see•'Windloadin Square 9 9— Aluminum Poles Poles' sheet.Poles longer than 3V are ExclusivelDelraGuard'-finish features an E-Coat Catalog j REC-GFiS&662 CFI segmented but shipped assembled. - epoxy primer with medium bronze acrylic.powder - topcoat.providing excellent resistance to corrosion, (1 2UV) ' ultraviolet degradation and abrasion.The finish is For 5'(127'mm).and.3 . covered by our 7 year limited warranty. (152 mm)Aluminum Poles 9201 Washington Avenue Racine,.Wisconsin 53406-3772'U.S.A. PHONE(414) 886-1900 FAX (414)884-3309 I.RU'V D o Ruud'.Lighting.Inc. Printed m U.S.A. httpVMww.mudlighting corn 1;1;ge LIGHTING! • z 4 STEEL POLES 2 . ` , ILLUMINUM POLES k 2' . 4 '° « ,'_SiEELPOLES ;'- fi PA3SlOG i)BZ 30 (915(4132 10 (3m)x3'(76mm) P�35t0' .)x' , 3b (9 1 m)x C(102 mm) 10 )x 3 (76 mm) Wall thickness-.18G(S,mm) Wall thickness .125'(3 mm) W e51 i 254-(5 mm) - q Base plate-8 (203 mm)square 1'' J0 mm) 10'.(254 mm)square x;SG(13 mmlthirk Bpnr�lla abol6l 4210x30'.(762 mm).3'5/6 mat) Arbor its;-1(2.13 x 12'(305 mm)375'(`0 mm thick B? 3 o mm) - Itt 3eter-x -((457 mm). (7 • Boltcircle diameter-.IC(254 mm).9.25' -11.00' bolt circle diameter-8.00'(203 mm) Bolt circle ciameter-10'(254 mm)9.25'-11.00' (235 mm 279 mm) Maximum fixture weight=100155.(45 Kg) Ma5mm-ix79 mm) Maximum fixture weight-250 lbs (11X Fr)Maximum fixture weighs-1 SO Ihs.(6-9 Kg) Approximate shipping we_ghl 30 Ibs.(i J7 Ng) • Shipping weight approximately 27 Ibs._(10 Kg) Approximate Shipping weigh) _79 Ibs (36 Kg) PP - --- PA3S15C(a)BZ PS35153(a)82 P55S255(a)BZ 15 (4.6 m)x 3'(76 mm) 25 (7.6 m)x 5'(127 mm) 15 (4.6 m)x 3'(76 mm) Wall thickness-.180'(5 mm) Wall thickness-.180'(5 mm) Wall thickness ,125'(3 mm) q Base plate-0'(203 mm)square 1.5' mm) Base plate-10'(254 mm)square x.750'(19 mm)(hick Bas rla�10101.(0 x436'(914 mm)X14'(102 mm) Anchexate -t7<.13 x 12'(305 mm)375'(10 thick Anchor halts-.3/4'.10 x 30'(762 mm)+3'O6:mm) Boll❑rule diameter.-10'(254 mm)9.25' -10.25'- Bolt circle diameter-8.00'(203 mm) Bolt circle diameter 79 -10'(254 mm)9.25'-11 a10' (235 mm-260 mm) Maximcle diameter weight 0 70 lbs.(32 Kg) Max mm-x79 mm) Maximum fixture weight 450 Ibs.(204 Kg) Approximate shipping weight weight 150 111.(68 Kg) Approximate shi in weight 320 Ibs.(145 K_ Shipping weight approximately 31 lbs(14 Kg)_ PP 9 9 g) - gpproxirnate shipping weight-114 115.(52 Kg)-.. PD__. "-"--- PA4515C(a)8Z pS5S30S(a)BZ 15 515 (a x'4'(102 mm) 19'(58 m) 30'(9:1 m)x 5'(127 mm)19'(5 8 m)x 3'(76 mm) Wall,lhickness-:180'(5 mm) Wall thickness-.125'(3 mm) Wall thickness-.180'l5 mm) Base plate 10'(254 mm)square x.500'(13mm)thick Base plate-10'(254 mm)square x_?i0'(19 mm)thick Base plate'-11 z 36'(914 mm).4'inm2(102 mm) Anchor bolts-3/4'40 x 18'(457 mm)*3'06 mm) Anchor colts a eter-10'30'(762 m) + 5(76 mm) Bolt circle diameter-10'(254 mm)9.25'-10:25' Bolt circle diameter-9.25'1235 mm) (235 circle 279 mm)-10'(254 mm)9.25'-11.00' (235 mm=260 mm) Maximum fixture weight-1231bm(57 Kg) Max mm-x79 mm) Maximum fixture weight-.375 lbs.(170 Kg) Maximum fixture ping weight i ht 1141 4 lbs.(64 A roximale shipping weight-379 Ibs.(172 Kg) _ Shipping5hipping weight aoproximgleiy 4A'Ibs.(20 Kg)____ Approximate shipping weight- 'Ibs.(64 Kg) ___ PP_ PA45190(a)BZ PS45100(a)BZ P55S35S(a)8Z 35'„(107 m)x 5'(127 mm) 19'(5.8.m)x 4'(102 mm) 1p't t(3.0 m)a 4'(102 mm) Wall thickness .180'(Sum) Wall thickness-250'(6 mm) Wall thickness- 120'(3 mm) Base plate 10'(254 mmpsGuare x.500"(13 mm)thick Base plate-10'(254 mm)square x.50'(13 mm)shirk Base Anchor bolts d-1 ter--1'(914 mm)) 4'1162 mm)nick Anchor bolts 314'-10 x 18'(457 mm)*3'(76 mm) Bollcircle bolts e diameter-3!4'-10 x 18'(457 mm) .25 06 mm) gall circle diameter-10'(254 mm)9.25'-1025' Boltcircle diameter-9:25'(235 mm) Bolt circle 29 m -10'(254 mm)9.25'-11.00' (235 mm-260 mm) Maximum fixture weight-175 16m(79 Kg) May mm-x79 mm) Maximum fixture weight-300 lbs.(136 kg) M orOximfixture ping w-4t0178.ba ( 5 Approximate stopping weight-4931bs.(224 Kg)__-- Shipping weight approximately 99 lbs(45 Kg) Approximate shipping weight (35 Kg)- PP - ---- - pP_9. 9 .__ PA5S25D(a)BZ' ' P54515 am) 4 3S6S31 m))x 6 30'(91 m)x6 (152 mm) 25'(7.6❑)x5(127 mm) kn s 4 (.1 2 m3 Wall thickness 180'(5 mm) Wall thickness- 250'(6 mm) kn-1 .254'(3 mm) square square Base plate 11'(279 mm)square x.500'(13 mm)thick to-10`(254 mm)(762 m x 750'(19;ti) thick Base plate t(305 x 76'(914 mm)+;4'(25 mm) Anchor bolts-1'-8 x 36'(914 mm)•4'(102 mm) Bolt cr bol diameter meter-1 ((54' mm) 25 -. 1'eu) BolCcirde diameter=11.5'(292 mmj (23 ci m- 9 m -10'(254 mm)9.257-11.00' (267 ate diameter-11.5'(292 mm)10.57-12.75' (235 mm-279 mm) (2fi7 mm-324 mm), Maximum.fixtureweight-260 115.(118 Kg) Maximum fixture weight-525 lbs.(238 Kg) Shipping u weight approximately 143 lbs. Ka) Maximum fixture weight-300:Ibs.:(136'54 Approximate shipping weight-457.115.(207 Kg) PF 9 9 -__ Approximate shipping weight-119 Ihs (54 Kg)_ _ PP PA6530D(eigh P56S35S(a)BZ 154518 m))a 35' (10.7 m)x 6'(152 mm) 30'(9.1'm)x 5 (152 mm) • Wall(5.8 kn s 4'(.1 2 (3 Wall Thickness-.180'(5,mm) Wall thickness .25G(6 mm) Wall tplte-10'(254 m)'sq q ) Base t plate 12'(305 mmp square x.500'(13 mm)thick Base plate-10'(254 mm)'square'x.150'(19 mm)thick Base Plate 10,(8 x 36(914 mm)4 4'(10 mm)¢k Anchor ase plate -t'-8 x 36'(914 mm) 4'(102 mm) Bolt crcle bolts a eter-x (254 mm)•3'(-5 mm) 'Boit circle diameter-11,5'(292 mm)10.50'-12.75' Bolt rcle bolts-1*-8r=13'9_40 m mm)Bolt circle diameter-10'(254 mm)9.:.5'-1 T.00' (267 mm-324 mm) Bolt Maximum fixture weight-323Ibs.(146 Ka) May mm-xtu mm) Maximim fixwre weight.-525 lbs.(238 Ko) Approximate fixture ping w-ht 114:(1 s. Kg) Shipping weight approximately 210 Ibs,(95 Ka) Approximate shipping weight-741 Ihs.(64 Kg) Approximate shipping weight-614 115 (278 Kg) _ P54525C(a)BZ .PS6S405(a)BZ_ . .._ 25'(7.5 ni)x 4'(102 mm) '40'(12.2m)x 6:(152 min) - thiCkness ' 120'mm)square Wall thickness-.180'(5 mm) Anchor l-10'(254 mm)(762 m.750'76 mm)tYLC0. pnchorabolts 1G(8 x436(914 mm)+4'(f1 h2❑❑)hick Broltcircoltsa3eter-10'(2542m) ,25'(- mm) Bolt circicdiameter-10'(254 mm)9.25'-71.00' circle diame 17:5'(292 mm) i 7 -12 .75' (235 mm-279 mm) (267 mm 324 rim) Maximum tl weight 75 18 (79 Kg) Maximumfxture weight-400 lbs (18,t';) Approximate shipping weight-182115:183_Kg) Approximate shipping weight-686 lbs:(311 Kg) P545255(a)B2 25'(7.6'm)z.4'(102 mm) • Wall thickness.-.180'1(5 mm). Base.plate-10'(254-mm)squared 1'(25 mm)thick . - • Anchor.bolts-314'-10 x 30'(762 mm) 3'(76 mm) - . Bolt circle diameter-10'(254 mm)9.25'-11.00' (235 mm-279 mm) ..Maximum fixture weight-350 lbs.-(159 Kg) - - Approximate shipping weight-252'lbs.(114:Kg) p ((U®I FAX (414) 884-3309• II! !!��,! 9201 Washington Avenue Racine.Wisconsin 53406-3772 U.S.A. PHONE (414) 686-1900 11/1/98 9 GHTI N G hhp/Iwww.nmdlighdng.com J o Ruud Lighting,Inc. Printed in U.S.A. 't ' - -'. 1 SQUARE POLES 4;.::.',WIRIDLOADIDIG“.:.t. , WIN,DLOADING POLES, -.:,.... .SQUARE ,/,-.<..c. r.'7:_i:1--'•-: • . _ ____ To choose the correct pole for an application,careful consideration must be given to the shape. size,number'and weighebfithe fixtures to be suppli as well as the geographical location of the job.The charts on this:sheet indicate the EPA(Effective Projected Area) ratings for Ruud poles and floc lights. Use this data in conjunction with the map below to choose the appropriate pole for your fixture and tenon setup The chart values are base win velocity and allow for a 1.3 gust factor.The EPA rating of the pole must be equal to or greater than that of the fixture,taking intotonsideration the wind ... conditions at the jobsite. • . Sin, Th. „ . 1 This map indicates approximate maximum wind zones througnout . North Amelia.8a-setrend relocit ties aretslablished using a . 50-yEar recurring mean.The EPA . rating of the,pole must ti equal to or great&th6mulat of the fist • u.• I i tt"It''. ,ITC.3. 73^--"ITTR' 41 ture(s).taking into consideration the%ma conaitions at the jobsde _. '''' '7tyyr' /'ori.- , •-T-1'..To .• i _ , i , It ‘ I- I;• I t ' . ,a, I t r • 4-rri-rnt_-_---inn ‘ ; , ,- , -=0,..' 71„--t&s4' /1 if - , --:. .--. ,__-----. f si irs7,7r. "te, ‘..:. bre \ •V.:-\:. ...-'-d".4 , ,If / l. er.........,, - b.- • I s- 'L.r.I. . ---------‘'L I - .. -- 7° '' ox . bin,..-125,,,,,„.., s1b2,-.. `..,:is.ffrns,s, c M 71 kri 7'. I . , 10 it.,>-; '''. ' I' l I I 1 - II ii,, 'I-If .1. '-- , --____fritE .._nconat•a, : • ''' / i "1..... -"::tair ,- \ *-7.--i • . „ , i ,....,-.1._t_LI ax --Tr--,, i ----.....--/- ..- 11 , - . ... u,,,,,.'G''1'1'r' m i .- 1--4.mi.rtel, .--..--I ,t , L...." IA ..-' tiAr"7..n. Va .- .. cw= 1.,^4.2” i ' c.,; -cir. rtattnEnn-t scar,- P-'^^-"f mr-t-ni l.„....,8, T.----" "'rfrr--tw-"fiTak Tiut t t- 14o/nts / ' -- -- icns0.P" ... 71.`" t riati _cut,raenchj.,"rEanntar-5°,50 . . NOTE Hanging Mg tO-norkT":" 1 `1 ---i-fT--7------ ' _n' t.t., , "-Ent r C.,. '....--. ners and flags on poles is .„,,,_,,l ' 't .``' "7"1-7'..--'--7- "" - ..5.q,ori- , not rEtommended without ' ;-=ai---3, “ I rf-t: . I Stkvnasea.Itec f. .b,,v..t i r•, Ed6siderina,increased . - •,.. .. windloading.The EPA rat- NOTE:Maximum base wind velocity t•____,---atanteart t--- t sHautre- tart------- '\; •'t• 4 ici'-'''',-..E1 ings below do not allow for far Havran is 80 mph. Ti----., tFL--rOT-T---iii-rr,s77°. -.rj ,,, , m.."..4 ,,,,,...,c7.--r.t.--Z"-- k .- 41■11ks,f„.,this a ded stress • ski a y1,y..H-,r- CI'') Tr,“ •■lw -• t ..-esereigne' Please consult factory kr I AT, *,,.-:-4. ,rnr...Fs. advice on pole selection if -v ...“.... Taffirb a; or..ft: attaching sIgnage or flags. 6-0...,., .:c:t4;:g I -P:4805 to tatilthdi'IttIPOLESitt, :i'TakritiAlc5:,,•°,•61,13110krittlfiTrYIidT7'i;8:11'llIg OTAOd*C•liIktPOLESitteniC'SClitai:.3853.'t.4.1rigiARAING -iI4f.:E/F:rt‘4I:44I:i . . . - - -- • H po s Hi rig, - 'dine Wind Velour/-MPH(WM • . . .. H((1)iw un)x '), !use Wind 65/any MPH((n*I / _ Well(in) 70(1131 80(121) 90(145) 100(161) 110(177) 129(1931 Wall On) 70(11i)' 301291 90(145).100(1611-110(1771 120(193) Square Steel Poles Square,Aluminum Poles PS35105.0)21 10 x 3 x 0 180 30.8 23.5 184 14.7 11.9 E8 PA3510C(a)B2 10 x 3 x 0.125 7.0 5.1 3.7 2.8 2.0 0.0 P53515S(a)BZ 15 x0 x 0.18O 18.0 13.5 10:3 8.0 5.3 • 5.0 PA3515C(a)BZ 15 x 3 x 0.125' 24 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 00 P535195(a)BZ 19 x 3 a 0.180 12.4 9.0 6.5 49 35 2.6' PA4S15C(a)BZ" 15 x'4 x 0.125 5.6 3.5 2.1 1.0 02 0.0 P54S10C(e)BZ 10 x 4 x 0.120 39.2 29.8 233 1E5 15.0 123 PA4S190(a)62 19 x 4 x 0.250 E5 5.7 3.6 2.1 _ 1.0 0.1 PS4S15C(a)BZ 15 x 4 X 0.120 229 17.1 13.1 1E1' 7.9 62 PA5525D(a&Z' 25 x 5 x 0.250 11.3 7.2 . 4.3 2.1___O4 0.0 PS4S19CSaZ 19 x 4 x 0 120 15.8 114 83 6.1 4.4 11 PA65300(a)13Z 30x 6 x 0.250 11.7 6.8 32 05 0.0 0.0 P54S25C(a)BZ 25 x 4 i 0.120 9.1 5.9 3.7 2.1 OE 0.0 . . . PS4S25S(a)8Z 25 4 x 0.180 15 4 10.9 7,6 5.3 3.5 2 2 .4,7, ,,.1,?,,,. ,-..:22,,,,:,..,rit -,i•iiiftcomtuituitiiitorra,-.2n.:.7..?i,c,-3.,7.;,;::„..;,:,i' PS4S30S(a)EIZ 30 x 3 X 0.180 • 99 E3 3.7 1.8 0.3 '0 0 :14.--1-, ,,-.- 4-1.1--1'tat Ir:-"," , II--.:- - - -'' ."''''-' PS5S255(a)61 25 x 5 x 0.180 25.7_ 19.3 14.1 10.3 7.5 5.3. PS5S30S(a)BZ 30x 5 x 0180 18.4 12.4 82 5.2 20 11 1 -II Sinole(direct mount) 5_ a Tripleidtrect mount) . a (75.3356(a)BZ '35 x 5-x 9.180 13.1 '.• 8.2 4.7 2.1 0.2 (IT - 1,15-6S30S(a)62 30 x 6 x 0.180 29.3 20.5 14.3 9.8 6.4 3.5 2 13-11 Twin 0180°(direct mount) 6 g'"ili Quad(direct main() _ PS5S356.(a)EZ - 35 x 6 x 0.180 21E 14.4 a3 5.5 2.7 0.5 3 Fla Twin t@ 90°(direct mount) .T, • Tenon(Eiter tetkonieparately) PS6S40Sj4_BZ '40 x 6 x 0.180 14.7 8.5 4.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 For fixtures with Fared 20'Mount.add prefix 2 to configuration numbers: Specify(a)pole configuration. . I.e.21.22,23.25 and 26. Metric Conversions:Feet to Meters s Feet 4 0.305:Inches Comm is Inches a 25.4 Poles longer than 30 19 2 nit ate segmented NA shipped asseMpled Pole freight based on ship to zip coat Poles can be ordered without base coveCOptiOnal Poles Canape factory for availapilky of po longer than 40'1122 ml,round tapered steel and aluminum poles.round tapered fiberglass poles.square straight wood poles,High Mast and SpOns Lighting poles.' • 9201 Washington Avenue Racine,Wisconsin 53 406-377 2 U.S.A. PHONE (41 4) 888-1900 FAX (414) 884-3309 .., . C Ruud Lighting, Prrinted in U.S,A. http:wwssuudlighting.com 11/1/98 !LIGHTING' . . . . x_ t.4 FIXTURES/EPA RATINGS;AI�INQiOADiNG • ,F,a SQUARE.POLES , . WINDLOADING . In-Line Brackel;(PBD) 1-112'Close,Pole.Mount (-'tilt) i- for Rectangular Housing I ;a' am'a -a, vea ® ®® `a® - if litres ,1 Figures . 13 wlre8rxan - 3 2 3 .5 fnN9 aem Number Ns 12 0o 9199 - - Square Tube PostiTop Light _- .---. 16 sq_'wusk 000--_160 . Na Na --- 22'n FoCy __ 119 290._ Na _Na Na_._ __ . 3 ___ . 22:sc.`10SrC 711 .-._ .• NOTE For Co igusalien 3.5&6.a6 2t8 housing.Mount special t veed. _ 22' burs! t O9 SelesO cs: - N.u_cn Crlpamarrs 3:5 B6wn 2 so nousiny,aspttal l$"FnmOa Pole MOUm mug be 54 housing P" -- _350 .__.. r '<50 8 e[pW M JwiN s>�Imsl' 6" -tend achy 250 S COW HP5&1UxW MM■wM saq'c,5 a1C ack ma 756 _ 6"Extended Pole Mount Arm (0`tilt) . ..3-f -® a-a o ®rn aa, Round Tube Post Top Licht____ . _ - C_emer Tenon a 0reci Fine _---1.21-.-__-_-___1.21 1 " 2 3 3 6 Ce_CenaT=a Direct Flaer; C queaem Number - - 41774 - _- --- 1-9_ 12'unodsr:g 0.55 1:10_ 0.92'. 1I e0. _.-16+ . Cirecl .____ _._-___ Ifi 59 n9.,'" .. .._ 095 1.50 150 1.25. 3-010 _ _._. .i6..59. IVY{rduv.9 161 3,29. Na. rn,- na___ 2uLogi table Fitter with 12'Square.rousing _ NOTE Fa Cod ttn53 566 w n 12 so noesvg,a so al 2 Extended Pole MW I mpg ce Gualoy r I Fi[uues 8 10' 20 ]0'�5 fio 1a 80 90' zed :oisuA aeay PNP13 1 I __ 051 065 077 08! 091 10T 1.16_ 1.20__175 12"Extended Pole'MountArml(special order) a ba%$ 2' .lime- 2.8ii09 3.14 179 3n 1]3_7.91 '199 401 pS.3 ]r I L n e !60 491191 .518 9 1 5,6 1 5 5 0 5 6 5 6.1 7 6 1 1 6 5 560 6.56 659_ 22"noll51r3e, x190'configuration ® a b P9•;1501 1®.W'd 3.90. !OA' 1.16 4.233 !30146 154 446 .459_ Cad3Uraeai 9w.tl 0r - 3 5 6 P9-1 l in-one 6 4_6.93 7.42. tit 79'- 8.W 0.91 9.11 9]1 1St - 458 '6_8 Sundae lvalmys halms m•1 I --_902006 0961.05 Ltl 128 Il] 1.11 111_ PJ aOFT Series e en wM Sao inn____ _ 121_1.00. 612 )1.-/P WI 2w'A' -- .1.26" 141 1 150. 162 -1 77 1&_ 107 Na _ pva vGTSa_es rn oarxma&sa9lnn _ 333 506 565 PIIPO•1■1801 2 g I 5 0 1 4 3. (43 1A 1:43 149 '1,7 5_ 1 9 3 1.9 5-•T 9 6-- a PT/P0 3(90) 3,P 93' :19]. 202 $.13_2.19 217 2,18 3.15 210 Na_ a-• 9 a9- cm n PT-3(1201 3®'110" .1 70 .1,89 1.21 2.36 711 276 lW 3.16 _3_Ifi_• Fixed 20'Mount a a ,a PvPO41901' a@9a'.. . 'air zw 22._02 :9i la Il2 >.�? list 3sa CtMgraewf NllNax. '21 22 4S, 25 20. PW.IA3 1 108' 1.12"---CI:14' '1.31' 1,38' 1.51_ 16J_1.67__1.60'_ 12n_x'mp 0.70 1.11 1,18 .1:66 236 PN•2A] 2 t i6 . 0 08 ' 73' 134' 16_5gtWSVe_ La 1,08. 217. 3.09 430 22'S6an;x _ ___ _:35 J.4_ Na Na - Na - . q . q . 2 Ajust erw r _-_ a-a a'SA Catalog]- S Futures'' a'. 10' 20 3P 45'W" 70' 0a' 90'. In-Line Bracket(PBD) 2 Firtures 3?Inures' ENP8.11 093 1.e6 127 179 150 170 195 202 133 PA/P02 2infot._346 3.71 !13 1,38 169 516_ 519 553 565_ 12'_sq,_Ca!;+�__-__-_.119_ 331 P913 ]Inaine 5.61 6.11 6]1 7.la 115 6.30 BBi 907-9U5. • 16 sg.bcpsi•9 00 3.W _.- PB d1e01 1®V1' 1.92 509 '.5.]0 S.42 5.5] 01. 591 6 W 605- 2.219.na!s,"� _ _ 7.01 1.62 -. 11.11_ t± J e5 Pt. 1'n Ine 1.16. 955 14r 5.90 1032 .1 e5 NOTE Fa OF braes we.sag ten add ON Cam sag len ant bad(box add 0 C9 0.0610151. PT- 1 .. _1.11 125 118 1.60 1.71 199 2.16 2.23 211 PUP03t90L_26.!AT_ 1,90 2Jfi 235 3.17 2.56_ 701_ Na_ Na_ Na - 1.1/2'Close Pole Mount(0'tilt) P-1-1-P0 peal for lea' 209 2.09210 x4 ._240 294 ATTa )4a___3,19.. for VET Series' .a 131-El PTIPC'(w71 3oe?01__ ter 3,ia_- ]10 311 349 15-175_.la_ Na Na. _ 1 2 P1_3(IA) 3 @i2o] 207 _241 ]50 _ 124 111 09 „_145_3.-63_, 563_ GoMOUalion Number P1lP7 4(901 4(T-90' 151 ll] 1 Sl 1.11 190 513 _Na Na_ Na _ 250&424 PM I&i sag lens) 164' 28 PN.1Ai -1 1'40' 1.53' 1 71' 186' 1.97 215' 212' 249 2 50'_ 2 506-'0024 HPSG ICNW MH IwiP.�ln's and-tact doll 1W. -. .]19 P01.7A7_. 2 2.50: 3.06' _3.46'. 373' 3.94'_440' 4.94' 1,98' 5.00' . • 6"Extended Pole Mount (0' tilt) 2"Adjustable Finer with 22"Square Housing _ :__ for VET Series °® ®-® Catalog a �Fixtures :0 10' 20 30' IF 50' 70. "a. 90' Conrimra0m Number 1 2 PA/P84 1 _1.62. 194 234 256 2.71 :326.__3.56„_ 369 369__ 2506I0CW we(*IN stile* _ 1.71__J 48 PAIPS7 Irvline 563 6,28 10 151 7 8 891_9.9 9.71 91]__ 250&ICOW HP5&1093W MH(win sa5lans a-A pad/box) ..1:79 ''58 P8• 3lrvhne 912 1027 1145 1212 1266 1123 15.12 15.51 1551_, PE74901 4 @ 90' _.93 -lir 9.82 9.04 912 9.71 1005 10.18 10113 P9-4 . 4 feline. ...1262' .1!27 15.81 16.73 1115 1951 2073 2115 2115= 111!2"Close Pole Mount(0'tilt) _- - -- '- • �.:. P41 1 '167 1.15_255 2_.77 29 14] _17 7.90 390 _.._ .. for Wedge Light -® a-a a 'a-a tit-a pi/POE 1Bpl ice ieo_315_3i5 3.87 1.99 i2 4.91_9.44 560 5,60' ' PFIp201. 33120' .3.33' 3.58. 4.4.97 5.1 531 '6.41 Na Na Na CoNlpaaeon Hunter 1 2 - 3 5 5 PJP1A1: 1 209' 211' 2.81' 3 OY 3.21' 3.731 4.031. '4.16' 1.16' • 16'sg2susmo _. 045 0130 - 093 841 136 P141-243 2 1.10' 482' `-62' 605' 6,42' 7/6' 5.06' 012' 8,22 22'5,1_rov5 _:_ 0.84_1,16 Na Na .Na •These values must be multiplied by This ratio: Fixture Mouthing Height NOTE:fi"Extended Poo Mourn d rqunel b CoNigwatims 1:5&6 Totat POle Heigh 6'Extended,Pole Mount Arm(0'tilt) a for Wedge Light -a v:v • v® as 2-Adjustable'Fitter with Reaangu/arHousing . -• Catalog a' I Fimnes, 0' 10 3a ' 20' ' 45' 60._70'__ 50 -9?-. Comfit?travel NUm6e4 1 - 2 3' 5 5 . PMP9-1 I '065 0.79 8.91_ 096 ON _ 1,14 _1.6 132111_ - 431 433 401 16' nasir. - 0.53 0.96 '0.91' 141 196 _ PNP9 2 2 im_lir2`_ 2.39 'l 11 1❑ 75] 7.9 _3.61 , _94. ^i.-__.-- ZT sq,TOUSirg -0.99 1.16 Na Na Na_ P9"1. <]I11-line: 4 91 5.13 5.89 521 .591 . 6.30 1.04 6.61 6.59 NOTE:6'Eve ciec Pate Mayo 5 reburet rQ Coolgualrv+s 1 5 I.6 P8 41901 1®p'- !I I 153 129 5 5.13 539 614 522 579__ P8'4 _ 40-'08 693 7.49 i,97 87- 8.17 -029 '0.89 9.77 929 917 . 1.112'Close Pole Mount O''tilt);O6'Extended Pole Mount PT'1 1. 566. 1.W . 1.12 1.17 ' 110 155 147 143 142 ( Pc/P0-2(90) 2Z,90' 1.32 144 136 160 161 1.71 . le WI Na Arm (0' tilt) or Fixed 20'Mount. a PTFP021100) 2?,180_1/4 11.35 15552. 139 1.6!11ss 2117 1977 7.95 IorRectangular Housing:.■ 'a•■ .a. a•e.. n-a Vntol(m) m90, 1 8 4 197_ 2 W '. 2 0 7.83 25 -. .Na. NP .Na... a ■ . a P1..2(120).__.;rn170 227 2!1 ___2 53 23 261 275 .98 2.04 ..'in.. aoConnotmun H u n e r - .1. 2 3 5 6 P110.4190) 439T NI 2 7 0' 291 290707 32. Na Na Na- 1 1 5 2'C Pole Moult km 061' 0.71 Na Na NI PW W 1 1 1 2 126' 128' 1AP 146 8 61 1.53 169' 160' d Encoded Pak Mamkm 0.60' 935 093 127. 1.86 PW293 2 24 252' 276 2.86' 1.9a. l22_160 lie. 326• 20'Fins Mount 0,28 121 - 150 ' 2.121 3CO 'These values must be multiplied by this ratio: Fixture Mounting Heigh Metric Conversions:Feet to Meters is Feet a P205:Inches to mm rs Inches r2P4 Total Pole Height RV a_V® 9201 Washington`Avenue :Racine,Wisconsin 53406-3772 U.S.A. PHONE(414)886=1900 FAX (414)884-3309 • _LIGHTING . -.. - , a Ruud Lighting,Inc. Printed in U.SA. httpJlwv4w mudlighting.com 1171/98 , • GUIDE TO HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LAMPS , 6, DOME MOUNT SUPPORT There are currently-tour families of OSRAM SYLVANIA Products Inc. ' Pressure Sodium lamps Lumalux PIuSTM Lumalux®LumaluC Standby ENO EAL " 'Unalux-The are one of the,most efficient HID'sources available; Thes mps HERMETIC tI l ;"A y >+ — ALUMINA ARC TUBE Ili are used for general lighting applications where high efficiency and long life are sTEEL. i' ! cuss ENVELOPE ANT ',lighting,andustriafh hi-bay, arkinotlol lighten y and'buui d ng floodliichting.street- . I, P 9' 9 9 9 floodlighting. LUMALUX-PLUSTM/ECOTM I i j These environmentally friendlier lamps are designed_with.lead:.free welded• - - fir. VACUUM mogul bases and m ' they contain up to 90 iless, ercury than standard,HPS I t' lamps They will NOT CYCLE at,end of'life. All lamps operate on existing HPS ballasts,for corresponding wattages. LUMALUX,P,LUS'M lamps pass the existing `1 Federal TCLP limit'iii '\ RESIDUE GAS GETTER i LUMALUX BRASS DATE Available,ina broad range of mogul base;general lightingrlamps'from 50-1000 ia RECORDING BASE watts for universal operation, Lamps from 35.to 150 watts aretatso available in Ai 'medium base Most lamps are available in clear and coated bulbs. LUMALUX® STANDBY These lamps are designed with two arc tubes to provide instant restrike capability in the event of,a momentary power interruption without total loss of light. UNALUX'T 3 T ' These retrofit lamps are designed to operate on all mercuryrreactor ballasts when increased light and reduced energy is desired. '''3 wA""INC LUMALUXPLUSTM, LUMALUX® AND LUMALUXC STANDBY-LAMPS -"AA" c A 1.These lamps must be oceraled with a fixture and ballast which has an ANSI designa lion identical lc the ANSI designation:'on the lamp etch'En the outer giass bulb, otherwise the lamp may sharer.resulting in the.discharge ot A� ;hot plass particles.SHOULD THIS OCCUR,THERE IS RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY, PROPERTY iii DAMAGE BURNS AND FIRE;FROM:.HOT PARTICLES OR SHATTERED GLASS, -I 2.Ode not remove or insert lamps when power is on.If outer glass'bulb is broken,shut off power immediately and rer-dvetamp after,It hascooled; 3.DO net expose operating lamp-to moisture. • 4,Replace the lamp it Omer glass bulb has scratched,cracked or damaoed in any way.. 1 5. Electrically insulate any metal support in contact with the outer glass bulb to avoid glass decomposition. y Operating and Installation Instructions • . 1.To avoid burn Injury,allow lamp to cool before removing from the fixture. 2.To ensure electrical contact screw lamp firmly but not forcibly into the socket.Excessive force may cause the outer glass bulb to break. 4 3.Lamps may be operated in any position. ut :A 4.For maximum system performance;replace lamp at or before end of published rated life. it 5.Lumalux=lamps require a specially designed base socket electrically rated Ito withstand 4000 volt pulses except LU750 andLU1000.which require sockets to with- ;,I stand 5000.volt pulses - _ WARNING _- I I UNALUXa LAMPS wARxlxc li Unalux lamps will!operate satfslactorily on conventional Mercury:ballast circuits,meeting,'urrent:ANSI specifications.Ballast must be high leakage reactance lag.type ',", auto-transformer;or.a 240 or,277 volt reactor for the 150W 215W,360W lamps and a 480.volt reactor Ior.the 880W Iamo.,Lamps should not be used in luminaries 1 which cause excessive;increase in arc tube operating voltage:Do''not use these lamps with.constant wattage or constant wattage auto-transformer ballasts, -? conventional high pressure sodium ballasts or equipment not• conditions shown In the following table. Approximate Mercury ANSI Lamp wattage Ballast :Unalatiags Lamp Unaluz Type .Wattage ti 175 - (H39) ULX-150. 150 i - 250 (H37) ULX:215 215 ;? 400 (H33) ULX.360: 360 1-. 1000 H36) ULX 680 880 - WARNING " SOX®.LAMPS.: I WARNING I . - 1.These lamps mus•"be operated with a fixture and ballast which has an ANSI designation'identical to the ANSI designation listed on 13 1 'page 84 for the corresponding wattages. • • ?1 2.Single based SOX lamps 35W IO.i 80W should be supported'tracliomreliel al the end opposite to the base. - • 3 SOX lamps contain a small quantity of sodium,In case of lampbreakage.the sodium may develop heat when in contact with'moisture,iTherelore,the lamp m i 1..b! stored and shipped'.enclosed in its original package. .l 4 The following procedure should be applied when disposing of burned out lamps in order to avoid damage; A:.Place lamp in a dry,high container and break it into small pieces in the open air and in a'dry atmosphere.B.Fill Me container with water by means of a rubber hose,. the operator standing at a sate:distance.c.Atter a few minutes,the sodium wilt be rendered harmless due to the ettectatthe water. Os care should be taken that no varnished parts.(for.Instance an;automobile)are in the neighborhood which-might be attacked by the sodium hydrate or splashes of sodium hydrate,respectively. • n /1�r �- U r� En (TT]S H T- ;el= 8r-te® ET-1B� IT-TT E-254- T 1 __ UMALUX® UM'ALUX PLUS'"/EC0'" Non cycling, environmentally friendlier high pressure sodium. -ar. d ox.., - Vendor I0 NO, Ule T� .yr.,,r}� is ;, OCI 046135 ANSI Avg. Approx. r '`•.' : A > rj'ts��, UPC 46135 Ordenng Spec. Pkg. Rated Lumens w.<83 -F ` 'Item No 'Abbreviation Number Ory, Description Hours Initial Mean LC. M.O.L 70 ET-23'6 Mog 67497 LU70/PLUS/ECO S62CX 20 Clear?' 24000 6300 5600 5 7% 100 ET-23'6. Mog 67559 LU100/PLUS/ECO S54CX 20 ClearE' • 24000 9500 8550 5 7% 150 ET-23'6 Mog 67494 LU150/55/PLUS/ECO S55CX 20_ Clear" 24000 16000 14400 5 7% 200 ET-18 Mog 67495 LU200/PLUS/ECO S66EJ 20 Clear" 24000 22000 19800 56 9,/,, 250 ET-18 Mog 67572 'LU250/PLUS/ECO SSOEJ 20 Clear" 24000 29000 26100 5X 9%, 400 ET-18 Mog 67312 LU400/PLUS/ECO S51EJ 20 Clear?,. 24000 50000 45000 5'/. 9"/„ STANDARD LUMALUX© General lighting high pressure sodium.. 35 E-17 Med. 67500 LU35/MED 576ZL 20 'Clear 16000+ 2250 2050 3X, 5X, 67501 LU35/0/MED S76ZL 20 Coated, i 16000+ 2100 1935 3V, 57A, 50 8-17 Med. 67502 LU50/ME0 S68ZL 20 Clear 24000+ 4000 3600 3X; 57/, 67503 LU50/0/MED' S68ZL 20 Coated, 24000+ 3700 3420 3X, 5%, ET-23'% ,Mog 67510 LUSO S68NV 20 Clear 24000+ 4000 3600. 5 7% 67511 LU50/0 S68NV 20 Coated, 24000+ 3700 3420 5 7% 70 E-17' Med. 67504 LU70/MED S62ZL 20 Clear 24000+ 6300 5350 3V, 5'L, • 67505, LU70/0/MED S62ZL 20 Coated, 24000+ 5800 4900 3%, 5X, ET-23'6' Mog 67512. LU70 S62CX 20 Clear 24000+ 6300 5500 5 7' l67513 LU70/D. S62CX 20 Coated, 24000+ 5800 4900 5 7% 100 E-17 Med. 67506 LU100/MED' S54ZL 20 Clear 24000+ 9500 8000 3%, 5%, 67507 TU100/D/MED S54ZL 20 Coated, 24000+ 8800 7500 3X, 5%, ET-23% Mog 67514 LU100 S54CX 20 Clear 24000+ 9500 8000 5 7% • 67515 'LU100/0 ' S54CX 20 Coated, 24000+ 8800 7500 5 7% 150 E-17 Med. 67508 ,LU150/MED S55ZL •20 Clear, 55'Volt 24000+ 15800 13400 3'/, 5'G, 67509 LU150/U! ED S55ZL 20 Coated,55 Volt, 44000+ 14500 12300 3%, 5'%, ET-23% Mog 67516 LU150/55 S55CX 20 Clear,55'Volt' 24000+ 16000 13800 5 7% ' 67517 L?J150/55/0 S55CX 20 'Coated,55 Volt,' 24000+ 14700 12500, 5, _ 7:4 BT-28 Mog 67518 LU150/100 S56KA 10 Clear, 100'Volt? 24000+ 15700 14100 5 8Me • 200 ET-18 'Mog 67576 LU200. 566EJ 20 Clear 24000+ .22000 19800 5N 91G, 250 ET-18 Mog 67578 LU250 S50EJ 20 Clear 24000+ 29000 26100 57. 91X, BT-28 Mog' 67521 LU250/0 S5OKA 10 Coated, 24000+ 26000 23400 5 8%, 310 ET-18 Mog 67580; LU310 S67EJ . '20 Clear 24000+ 37000 33300 5X 9"/, 350 T-14% Mog, 67613 LU350 SUPERD N/A 10', Clear 18000 46500 44000 5N 9'G 400 ET-18 Mog . .67533 • LU400 S51EJ "20 Clear 24000+ 50000 45000 5% 9/a BT-37 Mog i 67524 LU400/D S51ZC 10 Coated, 24000: 47500 42300 7 11% T-7 ' RSC i 67527 LU400T7RSC S51 10 . Clear 24000 46000 41400 5 10X, 430 T-14.5 Mog 67615 LU430 PLANTAD S51GJ 10 Clear ', 18000 51500 42400 6% 11% Ask• 600 T-16 Mog 67614 LU600 SUPER 510600 10 Clear 18000 92000 81000 6% 11% 67616 LU600 PLANTA❑ 51060C 10 Clear 18000 84000 75000 634 11% 750 87-37 Mog 67547 LU750 51112C 6 Clear" 24000 105000 94500 5% 11% 1000 E-25 Mog 67307 LU1000 352X13 6 . Clear" 24000+ 130000 120700 87/ 15X, opt-rw, Z _.... ®® , JOB INFORMATION THOMAS .�° �.. LIGHTING - ® • WALL LIGHT MEIIM HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM/METAL HALIDE •Ideal for Marty-4/0s of general and seiurihr lighting: shopping centerspapartmentcomplexes,schoos,motels; underpasses,tunnels;pnG industrial applicot o x :Y ; Durable construction High performance lens •Cooler ballast operation •Vandal proof options • : •Corrosion_resistant polyester powder coated dark bronze finish • •Quick disconnect for ease of installation/service •All electrical.components mounted in front housing CATALOG NUMBER k4 e ,,, ,r1 L t^ l � a ■ 7 � Asp l : a T 2 A f y,j �y e jf�.f� _ 1Y < ) i '�' Jai Fixture Wattage/Base Lamp Source Voltage Options WLM-WollLight+Medium 050 — 50 Med' M—Metal Halide 12 — 120 ` 0 —.Quartz Stand' 070 — 70 Med S High Pressure 20 208• PE Button Type Ph 100 — 100 Med Sodium . 24: — 240 Control Specify 150 — 150 Med" - 27 — 277 (Not Available in 480 175 — 175MOg"' 34 - 347 Volt.) 48, — 480 HR — Hot Restrike HPS • MT -_ 120/ . Ignitor 150 HS and ' 208/ below 240/ PCR - Photo Control ,277 Receptacle Only —me only • GSA - GSA Certified .ZIPS only WTP— Tamer proof :120/277 only . p p 17S MN Ballast wit operate Mercury Vapor lamp , All Opus Are Foamy Instolle'd 7 r All lamas ore operated horizontally CONSTRUCTION/FINISH ACCESSORIES • Heavy duty diecost aluminum housing top knock-out provided each side for feed GSWLM' — Glare Guard hinged for ease of maintenance through wiring VSWLM - Vandal Shield • Clear prismatic borosilicote glass is . • Pale mounting kit available WGWLM - Wire Guard • thermal/shock resistant WLL-PMN Pole Mounting Kit • Computer designed and precision formed ELECTRICAL WLS-PEC _ Photo!,Control specular aluminum reflector PC-MT • Primary'electrical disconnect standard Multi Volt TwisttLark'Photacell• • Two captive,stainless steel doorfasteners • • • Mogul base 4KV•rated socket, position • Long lasting silicone rubber gaskets oriented socket for 175 watt metal ant.d halide. • Corrosion resistarkiarchitectural bronze Note:Alf'accessories field installed. • polyester, awner coated p MSTALLATION Mounts directly to 31/2"octagon or 4" square outlet box. • Knock-out provided(for surface conduit entry (2 locations)3/4'NPT threaded top'entry, - -WLM 65-27 O 1 p+uti. -2._. S 700/BR 800 . . S P E C I F I C' A T 1 O N S . GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Each Gardco OPTICAL SYSTEM: Electrochemically ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor 85700 and ER800 is a bollard luminaire anodized die formed aluminum reflector ballast is the separate component type, utilizing 35 through 100W high intensity provides efficient •illumination and capable of providing reliable lamp starting discharge lamps-, Luminaires feature.a brightness control. Hammetoning of down to -20° F. High Pressure Sodium precision anodized aluminum reflector reflector assures clean, unstriated beam ballasts operate lamps within ANSI system which provides low glare uniform pattern. trapezoidal limits. MetalHalideand Mercury illumination and wide spacings. Units are Vapor ballasts are medium regulation auto totally sealed and gasketed.preventing SOCKET: Medium base pulse rated transformer providing =10`.1° (MH) and Intrusion Ci moisture. dust and insects into lampholder iS glazed porcelain with nickel ±15°/a (MV) power regulation with a ±5% the optical or electricai chambers. plated reinforced,screw shell and spring variation from rated input voltage. loaded contact. Component-to-component wiring within the HOUSING: Too and bottom housings are • • luminaire will carry no more than 80% of .125" (round) or .156" (square) high ANCHORAGE: Base assembly consists of rated current and is listed by UL for use at strength 6063-T5 extruded aluminum. a cast aluminum platform and ballast 600 VAC at 150° C or higher. Plug Bottom section has a melded-in cast nng for mounting bracket. Assembly is secured and disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 attachment to base assembly with four(4) leveled to the mounting foundation with four VAC, 15A or higher. hex head set screws. (4) 3/6''X 9n X 1 1/2"anchor bolts on;a 43/4" FINISH: Eachduminaire.receives afade and . bolt circle. Ballast is prewired with quick LENS: The lens is .250' (round) or ,31T electrical disconnects and mounting-bracket abrasion resistant electrostatically applied. r(spare) clear virgin acrylic positioned' is secured with two (2) Phillips head screws thermally cured and textured TGIC behveen upper and lower housing sections. for ease of installation and servicing polyester powder finish. Silicone gasket completely seals unit and permits thermal ex ansion. Labels: All fixtures bear UL wet location. P - CSA and I.8.E.W. labels. , D I M E N S I O N S A N D M O U N. T 1__N G D E T A I L S BS700 BR 800 NOTE: Factory supplied template must be used when setting anchor bolts. Gardco Lighting will not honor any claim for - incorrectanchorageplacementfrom failure to use factory supplied • .templates. I. Duo uo o.xran _ 7 Max. \ ✓ a°II Proienion • ` ,e. - I • \.. .. 4. . \ • ' ' . . . >j Ionian • gunmg I t Bon Circle ' I Gardco Lighting i. ,I /" San e an r°. A Street I. San Leancrg.CA 94577 80012?7.0758 5 34r I— a —1 ® CA 510/357.6900 FAX 51013573088 Gardco Lighting reserves the right to cnange materials or modify The design of its products without http7lwww.GardcoLighting.ceml — . nnnf'rrairan as can of the cemoanvs continuing product�mprovemeni program. , .1,,,,a„manias amp LLC O BS 700/BR 800 . I GENERAL DESCRIPTION:: Gardco's lamily of 8" O' R D, E R '.I N G diameter round and 6 3/4° square Bollards provides uniform illumination, superior spacings and remarkable PREFIX HEIGHT WATTAGE' VOLTAGE :FINISH. OPT10N3 brightness control. Rugged extruded and cast BB800 - 42 — •7OHP5 — 120 — WP —iF SHD construction'wi`h silicone=seals and gaskEting assure I I years of trouble free service, Each Gardcoiibollard Square 55700 42• 50MH' 120 SRP F utilize_ 35W through 100W high'intensity discharge Found SF800 35' 7OMH 208 - BLP SHD lamps. 30" 100MH 240 WP CUP 24" 50MV' 277 NP GEC0 75MV' VP • 100MV OC. • 35HPS SC 50HPS' . • 70HPS 100HPS TYPE PREFIX HEIGHT WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH, OPTIONS • • • FINISH • OPTIONS . _NOTES _ BPPP Bronze Paint F Fusing 1', Use medium base lamcs only BLP Black Paint SID Internal 180°Shield. 2. 120V primary only NP Natural Aluminum Paint OUP Duplex Receptacle' 3. 120/277V primary only r. WP White Paint GFOI GFC6.Receptacle' OC' Optional Color Paint . . . . .. -.._ 'SdrTry PAL designation as ^,vearhemgM Iiush-meumed in ' I , shown in The Color Selection lower housing.Available 4;136'and 42" Guide.ex OC FAL702a heignls only Recedlacle is Icca:ed a• 1 1. SC Special Color Paint minimum of IA".above grade (must supply color Praia) s-4 r rfi t .fi ,r: • r,� tt' '.ti w •,.�G�'d �s'/; .�y1` AA' .. - orp r t 3 ° t. ia. r tk QT£ 1 ` x 4- r r' v_ i'l• tv4Y r x-s ¢ i( • Garda]Lighting Ill 5,..-,: 1/515-:. "'1. .` t ,; 26611AIVaraCo Street ;. ,„pe r"zs : $ . San Leandro.CAr94577 ti9 800/227=0758 ,•••" t s a . 4I s` CA 510/357-6900 . i3; 'a ;,{.1611;1� , /'" FAX 510/357.3088 tiltpl/www.GarcicoligHtng.corn/ Genlyte.rhomas Group LLC • opt«. —2_. Y g k - w , t f r. r u'T : # (' ! n- �,. If M'F'�r r . Ew t Tt! '(". ' _ t i . + N 4 ,i r.°+c$ two The Ecolume ECA ECW is a rectilinear arm mounted area luminaire. The 2'...,;'1•4:1:y st(f a°>(s 'V,a°4 "ar?,aY�•t 131$.. ,�""l 4ei, nl �i, r!y 4� :75/K precision segmented,optical systems providelreGuired light levels, even .rr-, ,u ,; a s .,, .r'r ° `5 illumination wide pole;soacngs and glare control The housing is die-formed °1 :i = and the door frame is extruded aluminum, The Ecolume luminaire is a :: -` "—, �v � K n - completely sealed and gasketed, preventing intrusion from moisture, insects c=y t ,: w41: iy,F-'r+ and contaminants. c* s M� �,' 3° iy' p4 =-° ` r7; PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS ) (C�o;; T �.i J Type II Type V Square Type Ill Type IV Forward Throw 2H-Horizontal Lamp' OH, Hbriicntal Lamp :3H-Horizontal Lamp FH•Horizontal Lamp OV•Vertical Lamp 3V-Vortical Lamp F'd-Vertical Lamp O R D E R I N G PREFIX MOUNTING SIZE CONFIGURATION 'DISTRIBUTION' WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS EC --1 A JI 23 T 1 3H 1000MH 277 BRP l LF I i I I I I 1 EC A 14' 1 ❑--• 14„ 14" 120 BAP Bronze pant- F PTF DEC W 18' 2H 3V4 70 HPS 100'MH 208 BLP Black paint LF POLY DECT WA 23" 2 ❑ ❑ 3H by 4 100 HPS 4 '175 MH 240 WP White paint LA PTR4 LA ❑ QH FT' 150 HPS 4 200 M 5 277 NP Natural PCP PTR5 P1 3 ❑ I ❑ FH 13" 23T, 347 Aluminum POT PTF2 P2 18" i23° 250HPS 750 HPS 480 paint PCB PTF3 P3 Y 2H 2H 3V 400HFS 1000 HPS OC Optional Color HS ACR P4 4 ❑ • ❑ 3H 3V5 3H FV 250MH 750MH (SpecrryPAL MF QS b FH FV5 FH CV 400MH 1000MH deslgnadonas AP QUAD NOTES - QH QV 5 DH shown in Color 1.Arm mounting on round poles's designed to mount to AT CR poles measun it 3nl O.D.cr larger. Q RNC e 3V=RNC c DECT 18. Section Guide. 2„la'.and ta'unt's only. QV-RNC QV-ANC 450 PSMH ex:(x-RAL 7024) 3.Types 5 and 3 with reduced nadir candlepower:Should ' 351/ 750 HPS . be specifies only In applications requiring exvern QSV 750 MH SO Special Color Paint maximum to minimum unifonnry ratios(5 to I or`Ioweg; (Specify/Provide Reduced luminaire efficiency.will result in lower average 1000 MH looicandte levels. Color Chip) 4.Medium based Lamp.NA with 450V. • 5.Vertical tams medium base ony,Hoc lamp mogul only. 6.Supplied with sag lens. TYPE PREFIX MOUNTING SIZE CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION . WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS EC • DEC DECT . ° MOUNTING PREFIX ' A Arm Mount 1 • P1 Yoke'Mount•fits EMCO SSS5 pole • EC Ecolume W Wall Mount 2 P2 Yoke Mount-fits 23/8'0.D.tenon DEC Decolume WA Wall Mount w/arm(14°& 18'only) P3 Yoke Mount=fits 3'-3.5'0.D.tenon DECT Decolume Tall(18'only) LA Direct to pale mounting w/o arm P4 Yoke Mount-fits 4'0.D.tenon (14'& 18'oniy,single&twins at 180°only) OPTIONS F Fusing. . i FTR5 5'Pole Cap with Photocontrol receptacle.for 5555 pole. LF In-Pole/in-Line Fusing, (Photocontrols limited to 1000W maximum combined -to Direct to pole mounting(less arm)(only available w/single and twin 14'& 18'luminaires at 180°.) luminaire wattage:'N/A'W/480V) PCP Locking Type.Photecontrol Receptacle(not available with 480V.,.1000W Max) PTF2 Foie Top Fitter-2 3/8'x 4'. - POT Locking Type Phdtoconirol'Receptaclew/Ehotocontrol(not avaifable with 480V., 1000'W Max.) PTF3 Pole Top Fitter•3.3 1/2'x 6'. PC6 Button Photocontrol(not available with 480V., 1000W Max) PTF Fcle Top Fitter-3 1/2'x 4'x 6'. IDHS internal House Side Shield(Supplied standard for FWF✓.) ACR Acrylic Sag Lens(WA W/DECT 1 S.) MF Mast Arm Fitter(18 and 23'units only.) OS .Quartz Stanby. AP Adjustable Knuckle Pole Mount•(nOI available with 750/1000W DECT IS.) Quad Quad Tap Ballast. AT Adjustable Knuckle-Tenon Mount(rot available with DECA 23'luminaire.) CR Colored ReveavDecolume only. PTF Pole Top Fitter. Color subject to availability;consult factory. POLY Folycarbenate Sag..Lens only avaiiable,w/single and twin luminaires @ 180°(N/A with 750/1000W DECT 18) PTR4 4'Pole Cap with,Photocontrolreceptacle,for SSS4 pole. MEMCO 2661 Alvarado Street, San Leandro,,C.A194577 —'� LIGHTING arm 227.O758 (CAI 510.357.6900 -FAX 510.357.3088 _ _ ° ° oi.7vk Z • . SPECIFICATIONS. GENERAL DESCRIPTION: ELECTRICAL. •. Each EMCO Ecolume is a sharp cutoffiluminaire for high Each highbpowerfactor ballast is the separate component type intensity discharge. lamps. Internal components are totally capable of providing reliablelamppstarting to 20°F•The ballast'is enclosed. rain-tight, dust-tight, and corrosion resistant No mounted on.la unitized tray and prewired with quick electrical venting of the optical system or electrical components is required disconnects to the supply wire and Ihe:socket assembly..Entire or permitted. Lamp ng requires no lifting'or hinging of the ballast assembly is secured within the luminaire, above-the luminaire housing, dis;urbing`wi'ring:or exposing unrnsulated live reflector system,. parts. . • High Pressure Sodium ballasts operate lamps within ANSI HOUSING: ,trapezoidal.limits. The housing wrappe is,one-piece dieformed.aluminum with an integral reinforcing spline ano'no welded,corners. Silicone.seals Metal Halide ballasts are medium regulation auto-transformer provide a weathertiohl seal at all points of material transition. providing '_10°o power regulation with ±10Vvariation from rated input voltage. Component--to-component wiring'within the LENS: luminaire will carry no more than 80%of rated current and is UL, An extruded aluminum, clear anodized door frame retains.an recognized for use at 600 VAC!at 150° or higher, Plug optically clear, heat and impact resistant, tempered flat or disconnects are UL listed for use at 600'VAC;15A or higher. tempered sag glass lens. EC 18 Vertical lamp luminaires_utilize non-yellowing sag acrylic:Jenses. The DECT 18 vertical lamp. FINISH: luminaire sag lens is tempered glass. The lens is sealed to the Each luminaire receives a fade and abrasion resistant, . door frame and the coor frame is:gasketed to the housing with electrostatically applied, thermally-cured polyester powder finish hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded after fabrication. silicone rubber. LABELS: OPTICAL.SYSTEMS: All fixtures bear UL Wet Location IBEW labels. The Ecolume/Decolume segmented reflector system consists of tW0 levels of specular clear anodized aluminum facets precisely Emco Lighting reserves the right to charge mateiiats or modify the design of its aligned to achieve IES Types II III:V and Type IV Forward product without notification, as part of the company's continuing produce. Throw distributions. An uptight recovery box provides for even improvement program. • illumination'directly below the luminaire. All mogul base , I horizontally positioned metal halide units feature anposition- oriented lamp'holderand lamp stabilizer. 3V or CV vertical lamp units can be field adjusted to achieve wider luminaire spacings while still meeting IES semi-cutoff criteria. ARAI[MOUNT; a' t . ..z t,c,F ERA'S ANDINEIGkiT.S ECA14 ECA1B DEC-1:18 ECA23 A i14 sq 18".sq 18 tall 23"sq Ecolume.EPA(Effective Projected Area) Ft2 B 7" 10" '12" .14:5' Single C:Arm.Length 6" 9" . 9" 12' , .Single Arm Twin 18° Quad Weight ' D;Arm Height b° 5" 5'' 8" - i,E.Drop,Lens '2' 14" units Flat 1.1 2.2. 2.8 30 lbs - . Sag 1.2 2.3 3.6 32 lbs 18" units Flat 1.9 3.8 4.8 50 lbs A Sag 2.1 4.2 5.6 551bs - _ 18" tall Flat 2.2 4.3 5.6 82lbs �' Sag 2.3 4.7 6.1 84, lips . .1 o 23" units Flat '3.6 7.3 ' 8.8 901bs J i ® Sag 3.9 7.8 9.5 104lbs , -_2' I ECW14 ECW18 i A 14'sq 18'sq. . 0 - EMCO In;C6noda. EMCO ` 2661.Aivcrddo St. • TOL 'LIGHTING scrfLeandro.CA 94577 640 Cure Boivin Blvd. 800/22711758 • Boisbriand' 510/357-6900(Cclifornic) Quebec,Canada.7c 2A7 • - Genlyte Thomas+Group LLC FAX.510/367-3088 - Tel:514/433-3216, nn.,•r n.,..,..,.cmrnIirhtnn rrT FAX•:51Aia33AAA1. '79219-5W<00 omit^Z ( 1 0 411 STRAIGHT SQUARE STEEL +r3 ' GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco-EmcosLighting SSS straight steel pole consists of a one piece square = y;. fabricated steel lighting standard.. The carbon steel base plate is secured to the shaft with a continuous ir circumferential weld providing excellent strength and integrity. The poles are finished with an electrostatically e:`k ` applied, thermally cured TGIC polyester powder coat. All poles include anchor bolts, full base cover, hand hole ttI.y ground lug and too cap. O R D E R I N G ' ,APR'. POLE HEIGHT SIZE GAUGE DRILLING PAINTED FINISH OPTIONS �C;>•p SSS - 10 - 4 11 - 01 BRP - PC . �,.•'. I 'T T T I I ;r'sije : dal SSS 10' 4' 7 131: 1 way BRP: 'Bronze PC: Photccontrcl -', ' 12' 11 D2: 2 way NP: Natural and Receptac'e 4 s; 14' 03 3 way BLP:. Black • (1116P sad/ t 15' 04' 4 way WP: White PCR: Receptacle only 18' 72: 2 3/8' OD Tenon CC': Optional Color (n tPaIP) s 20' 74: 4100 Tenon rchnx1 A"'ss.gnron•s GFCI: Ground Fault qt� N' I sr+o n n Goer s.iecrcn Gude) Receptacle `a 24' SC:: Special Color 25' rwusnsupchcTMaaaP) DR: Duplex 'ate Receptacle + < FES: Festoon Outlet u � TYPE POLE HEIGHT SIZE GAUGE DRILLING' FINISH OPTIONS II SSS 4 ,, fM1r k; SSS 4 H u ' SSS 4 .. 4. r' c� SS 4 S SSS 4 SSS 4 '31 4 if CATALOG MAXIMUM °RS NUMBER POLE SIZE LUMINAIRE LOADING' ANCHOR BOLT DATA** 4 a POLE BOLT "• PREFIX HEIGHT SIZE GAUGE 100 MPH - 90 MPH 80 MPH CIRCLE BOLT SIZE MAX PROD a . (FT.) (inches) -EPA-FT2 EPA-FT2 EPA-FT2 (inches) (inches) (Inches) SSS 10 4 11 20:9 26.3 ' 34.0 8.0 3/4 ix 18 x 3 3.5 ik SSS 12 4 11 16.3 20.8 27.1 8:0 3/4 x 18 x'3 3.5 '��?. SSS 14 4 11 12.9 16.7 22:0 8.0 3/4 x'18.X 3 3.5 �' SSS 15 4 11 11.5 15.0 19:9 8.0 3/4x18x3 3.5 SSS 18 4 11 6.2 8.5 11.8 8.0 3/4x18x3 3.5 SSS 20 4 11 4:6 6:6 9:6 8.0' 3/4x18X3 3.5 . SSS 20 4 7 8:8 11.8 16:0 8.0 3/4x18x3 3.5 ?: SSS 24 4 11 2:0 3:6 . 6:0 8.0 3/4x18 x3 3.5 ,-. SSS 24 4 7 5f4. 7.8 11.4 - 8.0 3/4`x 18 x.3 3.5 SSS 25 4 11 1:4 3:0 5:3 8.0 3/4x18x3 3.5 ks SSS 25 4 7 4.7 7.0 10.4 . 8.0 3/4x18x3" 3.5 ' .1 ' srydasF� 'Warning:Acetone]wend loafing,in terms al EPA;born banners camera&floodlights and other accessories attated to the pole.must be added to the lumina refs) :e�1 t{ allEPA before select ng:Y eve with the app cpnate wind bad capability. �yy "Factory suppled template must be used when setting anchor bolls. Gardco-Emco Lgnting will not honer any claim br Incorec anchorage placement resulting from failure to use factory supplied templates. ? 11 ColpGardcoE NIICQ ?661 Alvarado Street San Leandro,CA 94577 ph: 800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 ftF 'Ft`i Lighting T LIGHTING FAX 510/357-3088 http:!/v+vnv.sitelighting.carn/ `"b -' Gentle Thomas Group LLC . . POLES 41 'STRAIGHT :SQUARE STEEL SPECIFICATIONS III- POLE SHAFT: The pole shaft is HANDHOLE: The reinforced handhole For example:coastal.areas,and airports. fabricated.from a single piece,of 11 ga has a nominal rectangular 2' X 4' inside (.1196') or 7 ga (.1793') commercial opening in the pole'-shaft. Included is an Standards' are designed for ground carbon steel. The formed steel plate'is aluminum cover'plate with attachment mounted applications. Standards longitudinally welded providing minimum screws. The handhole is located 12' mounted,on structures (such as buildings yield strength of 46 KSI. above the base and 180°-clockwise with and bridges)-may also-necessitate special , . 'respect to the luminaire arm when viewed consideration requiring Gardco Emco ANCHOR BASE: The pole anchor'base from the top of.the polerfor onearm, For Lighting's-recommendation. is fabricated from A-36 structural quality two arms the handhole is located directly carbon steel with a minimum yield under one arm. Height correction factors and. drag strength of 36 KSI. The base plate coefficients are'applied to the.entire telescopes'. the pole shaft and is POLE TOP CAP:'Each;pole assembly is structure. An-appropnate safety factor is circumferentially welded on both top and provided with a removable pcle top cap. maintained based on'the minimum yield bottom. strength of the material incorporated in the FINISH: Poles"are available with abronze, standard. ANCHOR BOLTS: Anchor bolts are natural, white or black electrostatically fabricated from a commercial quality hot' applied, thermally cured TGIC polyester GENERAL INFORMATION:'' Mounting rolled carbon steel bar that meets or powder finish: height is the vertical distance from the exceeds a minimum guaranteed yield base of the lighting,standardjo the center strength of 50;000 psi. Bolts have-an ".12 DESIGN: The standards as charted are of the luminaire arm at the point of bend on one end and threaded on the designed to withstand dead loads and luminaire attachment. opposite end a minimum of 41/2'. Anchor predicted dynamic loads developed by bolts. are completely hot dipped variable wind speeds with an additional Twin arms as charted.are oriented at 180° galvanized. Four (4) properly sized bolts„ 30% gust factor under the following with respect to each. other. For each furnished with,'two (2) regular hex conditions: applications of two (2), arms at 90° or nuts;.two (2) flat washers and one (1) lock other multiple arm applications, consult washer are provided per pole, unless The charted weights include luminaire(s) the factory • . otherwise specified. - and/or mounting bracket(s). Gardco-Emco Lighting'reserves the right to change BASE COVER: A two piece, fabricated The wind;velocities-are based on 10 mph naterralsor modify the design oats product without covercdmpletelyconceals,the entire base increments from 80 mph through 100 notification as part oLrne ccmpany'sconrinuing product improvement pro gram. plate and anchorage. The base coveris mph. Standards to-be locatedin'areas of secured to the base assembly.with'two (2) known abnormal conditions may require co Copyright Gardco-Emco Lighting. Alr.rights stainless'steel'fasteners. special consideration. reserved:International;copynghfsecured. ,Cut hole in template 1/16'larger than dameter of ssS4 Pale' anchor bolls used. � Gcver Mounting 5aews O �. base Cover Pole ® 3/4'Anchor eons(4) Er - Top Nuts(4) Conduit opening IEli', Lock Washers(4) 3.64'8'BC .B� Flat washers(a) 3.5'Max. I mw---IP �nm�� Grout as required / c LrI////' alter level ng.pole �� Leveling Nuts(4) p '' p O O p p to Concrete soil Ling c sud sail Sectionease conditions • s opGardco EMC� 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro,.CA 94577 ph:-800/227-0758 CA510/357-6900 Lighting :-!e'=LIGHTING FAX 5t0/357;3088 :http://viww:sitelighting:corn/ 79415-17/899 • CentreTwmas Group LLG . - - • • • Neighborhood Meeting at'The Salvation Army - Auzust 9, 2000 at-6:,00 p.m. The primary purpose of this get together was to give the neighborho d a chance to express their concerns and to answer questions with factual information. There were several rumors going around as to what our project was, and what were our intended uses. The meeting was open by Captain Brian:Hoover and architect Wayne Miller. These are the concerns and/or opinions expressed that are applicable to our project: - - Our services (childcare, family social services, etc.) don't belong in a residential neighborhood. - - Our presence here would be a.'magnet' to the homeless population causing them to • hang out in the neighborhood. - We would expose the neighborhood children to homeless drug addicts and their residue (garbage, used needles, etc.) - Use of our facility would greatly increase traffic flow on their.streets (Sarkesian, Caulfield, Parklane) - The traffic in and out of our site,would be a disruption to their lives. - The childcare facility was too noisy and too close to their houses. - There was fear of tall parking lot lights keeping the whole neighborhood lit up at night. - Property values would plummet. - We were providing childcare without a license • - There were other chiding and accusatory remarks but not issues that we can do anything about by design or concessions. As these topics were expressed wearied to address as best as we could but most intelligent responses ignored or questioned further. • • • • • • • • Neighborhood Meeting at The Salvation Army- August 30, 2000 at 6:00 p.m. • Wayne Miller officially opened the meeting, thanking those who responded to the invitation to.come.. The initial request for response was directed to Herb Bundeson (from the,doctor)- Q. Is there a"bail out" clause that TS:A can get their money back if the'plans for site improvements/new facilities can't be accomplished? A. (Herb): TSA purchased the property just as anyone else would. The property is zoned for childcare. TSA administers all,programs,;as a service to the city of Petaluma;: childcare is no different.-The City'has'made,known the need for additional,childcare facilities. As a non-profit,.TSA,is not considering providing this service "for the money." It is hard to criticize TSA for their Q. Is childcare:a permitted use for this property? Neighbors don't mind a church "with a permitted time frame"... A. (Herb)': Childcare is a need of the City. The advisory board and all concerned would like to see the Army fulfill this No complaints lodged from neighbors of other day care centers around the city. Comment (doctor): Childcare was already being provided on this property until "we" • turned the Army"in" . . Response;(Capt.. Tina Hoover): That is absolutely false. Response (Wayne): Children of transitional'housing clients,generally accompany`parents to their weekly scheduled meetings. These are the children seen playing on the'property. Discussion centered on the changes made to:the'original site plan to accommodate the neighbors' concerns. 1- the traffic survey results are not yetavailable; those involved are attempting to provide: solutions to any increase in traffic patterns that may occur 2- the initial chapel design allowed 200 in attendance requiring a certain number of parking spaces. This has been reduced to 150, reflecting a change in the parking spaces, allowing a.larger buffer to provide visual and;acoustic screening for the neighbors. 3-the:initially proposed hours of operation for the childcare facility:have been reduced considerably; evening/night hours would provide care for a reduced number of children, (both of these items will be built into the use permit). Neighbor Input' No problems with the chapel. Neighbors don'tcare; the're`is no real opposition to the church. Perhaps TSA'could.do a"trade off' with the City whereby the City would tum the back,lot into a:park and TSA would be provided a site for child care (possibly the Kennilworth.site). Response (Herb): There would be costs.involved to lease/rent an alternate site. As a - non-profit, any additional costs could prohibit the feasibility of providing the service. Input: Why not-sell this facility and buy thatone? • Response (Herb/Wayne): No;one,lcnows,as yet what will..happen with the Kenilworth facility: It•,is in+the future. As for a use permit hassbeen filed. • The desire of TSA is to make this project the best it can be, the purpose of this meeting is to request input to make that happen. Input (doctor): The facility will affect my quality of life. Response (Wayne): Why? Response: The noise of children in the back yard. Solution suggested by TSA: Limit the hours children are outside at night as pad of the use permit. Solution suggested by TSA: More central location of the childcare facility on the property. Response (other neighbor): Then it's by MY house. Response (female neighbor): We can already hear (the noise) from McDowell School. Concern (Neighbor): property values Will decrease. Response (Clayton Engstrom) This:is an emotional:reaction,,not one proven in the marketplace. Property values in Petaluma are in great:shape for a long time to come. Reaction (doctor): I can get 12 letters from realtors disagreeing to that. • Response (Clayton): Challenge to that statement- would Iilce'to see the evidence. There is no.basis for loss in value (to their properties). • Concern (Neighbor): This is "too much of a project" anci'''hbt feasible for this neighborhood." No problem with 200-250 attending the church. Request (female neighbor): We missed the last-meeting. Please explain the plans. Wayne detailed the site plan. Question (neighbor): What is the dimension from,the back fence? Response (Wayne): X# of feet-possible modification, yet as far back as possible so there is a separation from the other services on the property. Question(neighbor): What is the time frame expected? Will projects be completed in • stages? Response"(Wayne/Herb): Depends on the capital campaign. The City supports the childcare facility project as a priority; TSA is willing to wait-for-construction of the chapel.lasf. TSA will "do what isrnost.beneficial"first: Wayne thanked the neighbors for their willingness to listen and-express,their views. The • next meeting is scheduled for September 6, 2000, however; Wayne will be out of town • • that week. • . Ff l ` a c�� " . LUCK GRAVETT - ks; 1568 TRELLIS LANE, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA 94954-5444 . • 707-762-8408 E MAIL bcgravett cr aol com 2. rye,,, f,, it r — s } $,. 14 August, 20 • Lieutenants Brian and Tina'Hoove _ Corps Officers _ Post Office'Bpx 750684 Petaluma, California 94975-0684 Reference: New facility on South McDowell Boulevard Dear Corps Officers: Yourintent to establish a center,that will attract an ever increasing number of attendees; many of which will become'frequent and lengthy on-site seekers.of your services, at the•McDowell Boulevard location is very questionable. It seems that the decision to change the character and use of this site was made without any regard for, or imputfrom,.the residents'of this established residential'neighborh and if I understand the situation as it has developed you are attempting to use`the existing `use..pe s)' iSS�e for the previous-Occupant. Do you really believe that your ii tended`use ofthis-'facility is the"same_as a -A , house of worship that is in use only sporadically? ` ' • As you know many of the-attendees, that will frequent your anticipated facility, are such that it can be 'ft expected to create situations of gatherings in the area of persons that have a'reputation`,of disregard for • 2 the residents And this main boulevard, very near to the intersection of another main traffic artery, is sure to create aproblem with the_flow of traffic at this:very:busy intersection"- - In addition to the long iestablisfied residents in the immediate neighborhood, there should also be 1S.1'-i4 shown conside ation for the residents of the Petaluma Ecumenical Project which'isdocated just around the corner. These residents will experience-th ,noise, incon\enience anddistutbahces:that experience should tell you will accompany your provided services. This attempt to force your will on the residents, and without imput from them, is totally out of character for-The Salvation Army. And,the matter of the change.in use of the facility, which I understand the appropriate city depart- ments are to accent='is questionable, as is'the fact that the city is also?a£theopiaiorfthatthe building.does SS s4-11 not have to comply with the _Americans with Disabilities Act. Bya copy of•this letter I am asking the ., if • concemed(or should be concerned) city department(s) clarify their,reluctance to enforce.the'appropriate . codes. - . • Very sincerely, III • • Luck Gravett 1568 Trellis-Lane Petaluma, CA. 94954 'September 13, 2000 • blear Mr. Gravett, •I am writing in response to your letter of concern dated August 14, 2000. You will note that I have attached issue numbers in an attempt:to keep this-response dear and intelligible. Issue #1 • It would be good to note exactly what-is permitted under the current use permit. Any function that follows what would be usual church activity is.permitted. Being a Christian yourself(I assume this from the sticker attached to this letter) you would`know that there is a Biblical.mandate for the•Church to be more than a house of worship that is in use only sporadically. The church is supposed to be involved in the community and be of some helpful service to it. .I would hope that being a useful church would not be a liability to us. Just in case you have been exposed to the rumors going around, we are not sheltering homeless people and we are not providing any kind of licensed or unlicensed childcare. Issue #2 Our mission in this community is to be a family service center. We do next to nothing in the homeless single population because the opportunity center is set up for these services. Secondly, we do not allow loitering in front of ourbuitding (except those waiting for the bus).and we do not allow it in our parking lc'. The people we serve are very aware of our rules of decorum. 'Those who cant come here peaceably lose • their rights to services and most aren't willing to take that chance. • As far as traffic goes we have not made the anticipated impact on local arieries.• In fact, we have - restructured some of our social service programs to reduce the number of cars coming to our site for weekday programs. As far as our church growth, I just can't see that as a negative impact. Issue #3 We have a five-year presence in the PEP project by delivering;groceries to some of the residents, We also. • have a couple of senior programs that would be of interest to many. ' It should be noted that we have an open dialog and are monitoring our impact on an on-going basis. There have been a couple of outside children's programs that probably-far-exceeded our usual noise levels and there was not one complaint mentioned. Please know that we will continue to.be a good neighbor. Issue #4 I'm not sure as to how this idea came to be. I can assure you that our-present building is fully handicapped accessible. However, during the remodel we will need to widen the space between the door swing and the handicap stall in the women's restr oom to meet the Code changes that-have occurred Additionally, all of our future building plans will need to be, and in tar are, designed to be fully handicap accessible both from the parking-areas and directly from the street, • I thank you much for your letter. The more intelligent conversation that is had the better we can think this through to make it best it can be for all • Sincerely, Brian E. Hoover, Captain Conditions of Approval:from,PBAC, 11/29/00 with revision 1/24/01 Salvation Army,planner Betsi`Lewitter 1) Bicycle Parking, interior and exterior • Total required bicycle parking exterior-covered and interior-secure is a minimum of 10°A of auto parking; as per Muni,Cdde 20-301. In this case, since the total car parking is 48, 5 bicycle parking places are required. • The owner shall provide;exterior-covered bicycle parking at the playground,the church,the child care center and the social:services building. • Formal interior-secure bicycle parking is not required. • Inspection by the City shall ensure that this has`taken place.before the project is deemed complete. 2) Showers/Clothes Lockers • The ownershall provide one shower for employee use, based on,total square footage of the project, as per Muni Code20-1300: • The owner shall;provide 5 clothes lockers near the shower,the same number as total minimum bicycle parking required. 3) Lighting • All lighting provided by the owner--including building,parking lot and security lighting--shall • be directed downward with light bulbs Well-covered to avoid anydirect glare into surrounding bicycle/pedestrian areas 4) Benches/Water Fountains • The owner shall provide exterior'seating at benches/tables fora niiniinum of 10 persons, calculated at twice the amount of bicycle parking spaces required. • Of the seating required, atleastone..shaded bench shall be along:McDowell(an bench at a bus stop will suffice)and one shaded bench interior to the-Project for employee breaks. • No water fountains for the Public are required of this project,although.the PBAC recommends the exterior play area be'equipped:with one 5) Signs • The owner shall ensure that all signs in the sidewalk'fronting.this-property.are at an appropriate distance from the curb to allow a wheelchair or bicycle with baby trailer to safely pass on the sidewalk proper. 6) Incentives for Employees/Customers to Walk/Bicycle to fanility • The owners/leasees shall provide,asimple one-page documenttothe City naming adesignated "transportation,coordinator"'-and describing specific incentives for"employees and customers to walk/bicycle to the facility thereby encouraging alternatives to dnving carsto'this facility. Examples include lending-bicycles for.short errands,monetary or other:rewards for not driving, etc. This documentation shall be received by the City prier to'issuance of the • certificate of occupancy. J' 77??-C#/1 )T S • This building shall•have on-sue facilities-for.food storage,preparation and eating,accessible;to • dll employees of all.buildings. • The owner shall provide outdoor eating facilities for its employees. 10) .Pesticide/Herbicide - • Under no circumstancessshould•any pesticide/herbicide be applied in areas used by pedestrians/bicyclists anywhere in this project or the surrounding area without appropriate signage;,a policy currently employed by.the•Music, Recreation and Parks Department;, • This project shall utilize:Best Management,Practices regarding-pesticide/herbicide.uase and fully commit to+Integrated4Pest Management techniques for the protection of bicyclists"and• • pedestrians. • • • • • CITY OF PETALLJMA, CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM Community De"velopment;Departinent,Planning Division,.11 Epgiish Street, Petaluma, CA 94952 (707)778-4301 Fax(707) 778=4498 E mail:plannmggen.petaluma.ca is DATE: January 17, 2001. TO: Betsi Lewitter FROM: Anne Windsor/Jan Tolbert SUBJECT: Estimated Development Fees for Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit Below are the estimated development fees for the Salvation Army: Sewer: Contact Michael Ban,.Engiheering Manager, @ 778-4392 for quotation. Water: Contact the Water Field Office.@ 778-4392 for quotation. Community Facilities Fees: $19,888 ($.88 x 22,600 sq:ft.) • Storm Drain: $3;236 (15,663 sq. ft. new impervious surface x 0.20661). School Facilities Fee: Contact the School District @ 778-4621. Traffic Mitigation: To be determined after review by Traffic consultant. • • • • • .S\Plan DepAfeequote\721 smcdoweil-solarmy.doe City of Petaluma, California • • Memorandum Community DevelopmenttDepartment, Engineering;Section, 22 Bassett Street ,Petaluma,CA 94952. (707) 778-4301 Fax (707) 778•4498 E-mail:planning@ci.petaluma.ca:as • DATE: January 4, 2001 TO: Betsi Lewitter, Project Planner • FROM: Curt'Bates, Assistant in Civil Engineering • SUBJECT: CUP.20014•— Salvation Army— 721 S. McDowell Blvd, • APN: 007-570-028 The'Engineering Section has reviewed the above-mentioned project referral and has conditionally deemed the application complete. The following conditions of approval must be^satisfied prior to any building permit issuance. Attached is a checklist of standard Engineering Section requirements for a commercial site/grading •plan accompanying a building permit. application. The Engineering Section has not yet performed a detailed review for required building permit application items shown on,the-attached list. The list is provided to the applicant in an attempt'to address required items upfront and reduce the number of subsequent submittals which may have • • otherwise been required. 1. A 10-foot wide'.right of way dedication to the City of Petaluma is required for the 100-foot iong,portion of parcel street frontage. 2. An executed private storm drain easement grant deed shall be obtained from the adjacent,existing Petaluma Ecumenical Project (PEP) development (APN: 007-570- 029) located southeasterly of the proposed project. Note: A letter of intent dated 12/21/00 to enter offer the above-mentioned easement from PEP to the Salvation Army is on file with the City of Petaluma Community Development Department. 3. Hydrology calculations for the proposed and existing storm drain system shall be submitted to the Engineering Sectronfor review. Additionally, the calculations should indicate that the existing storm drain facilities located on the PEP project are hydraulically capable of handling the increase in peak storm water runoff based on the proposed site development. Sonoma County Water Agency standards should be used be to perform the analysis. . 4. All portions of broken, cracked, or otherwise damaged sidewalk or driveway approach's located along the entire parcel frontage shall be replaced. 5.. An excavation permit is required for all work within the public right of way including • sidewalks, driveway approaches, water supply and sewerage installations, etc. • 6. All work.within the public right of way shall conform to the City of Petaluma latest standards, codes,-policies, etc. - 7. Lot to lot surface drainage and concentrated drainage of public sidewalks shall not occur. • • • • s:/DPP/PPR/CU P/C UP200 I4a . • CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM City Manager's Office, 11 English Street, Petaluma, CA 94952 • (707) 778-4395 Fax(707) 778-4419 E-mail: city ntgKiCri.petalunfa.ca.ifs DATE: December 4, 2000 TO: Betsi Lewitter • FROM: Gary Blackledge SUBJECT: Salvation Army, 721 McDowell Blvd. Need to have contractor submit G.P.M. requirements needed for water connections. Will need a minimum of 1" service for domestic and minimum 1"service for irrigation. Need copy of Utility plans for this project. • cc. Curt-Bates Steve Simmons • • • • • S • City of Petaluina, California MEMORANDUM . Fire Marshal, 1.1 English,Streei, Petaluma, CA 94952 (707) 778-4389, Fax (707). 762-4547 • DATE: November 22;.2000 TO: Betsi Lewitter, P-rojectPlanner FROM: Lonnie"Armstrong Plans Exam n u' SUBJECT: Salvation'Army, 721 McDowell Boulevard South Listed below are fire protection requirements for the above-mentioned project: To avoid requests for subsequent submittals, please show or note all Fire Department requirements on plans submitted for building permit. CHILD CARE BUILDING • 1. The building/s shall be-protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the Uniforin Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, which will notify the fire department in the event of water flow: In addition, a local alarm shall be provided on the exterior and interior Of the building. 2. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor that will notify the fire department in the event of an alarm. 3. This facility requires an annual Fire Department permit for a commercial child care facility. The permit fee is $60.00 per year and'is due prior to occupancy approval and/or operation. 4. This facility shall meet the requirements in the 1998 California Uniform Fire.Code article 10 and in FPA 72. NEW CHAPEL & EXISTING CHURCH 1. Provide a KNOX BOX for fire department access. KNOX BOX shall contain keys or access -codes to building/s. 2. All curtains,.drapes,,hangings, or other decorative material shall be flame retardant or treated with an approved fire retardant chemical by a licensed State Fire Marshal Applicator. • 3. This business;requires an annual fire department permit for Places of Assembly of less than 300. The permit fee of$60.00 is due prior to occupancy approval and or operation. 1 • 4. The building/s shall be protected by an.automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the Uniform Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, which will notify the fire department in the event of water flow. In addition, a local alarm shall be provided on the exterior and interior of the building: 5. A permit is required from the Fire Marshal for the installation or alteration of a fire sprinkler system prior to the commencement of work. A minimum of two sets of plans with calculations is required to be submitted for review and approval. • 6. Contractors installing underground, fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a.permit and submit 2 sets of plans for approval prior to commending work. A hydrostatic test of 200 psi for two hours is required prior to backfill. All joints shall be visible at time of inspection. Underground installations shall be flushed to fire department satisfaction,prior to connection to overhead. NOTE: Civil utility plans and/or- other plans approved, or not,. will not be accepted in lieu'of the above requirement. 7. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma City'Water Department approval prior to charging onsite underground water mains. 8. All contractors shall have a city business license and a workers compensation certificate on file with th Fire Marshal's office. 9. Provide an approved automatic fire extinguishing system to protect all cooking equipment. 10. Fixed fire extinguishing systems'shall be installed by a licensed contractor. Contractor shall • obtain.the required permit from, and submit two sets,of plans for review by,the Tire Marshal. 'Systems ar •subject.to testing and inspection'by the Fire Marshal's office prior to acceptance. 11. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor, which will notify the fire department in the event of an alarm. 12. All required fre.lanesin which no parking is allowed shall be designated by painting curbs red. Where no curbs exist, signs•approved by the Fire Marshal shall be 13. No combustible construction above the foundation is allowed unless an approved asphalt surfaced road is provided to within 150 feet of the furthest point of a structure and the fire hydrants have been tested, flushed, and are in service. 14. Install fire hydrants every 300 lineal feet. No structure or fire department sprinkler connection shall be in excess of 150 feet from a fire hydrant. SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING I. The-building/s shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the Uniform.Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alaiiu monitoring, which will 2 • • notify the fire'department in the event of water flow. In addition, a local alarm shall be • provided on the exterior and interiof of the building. • 2. Contractors installing underground' fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and submit 2 sets of plans for approval prior to commencing work. A hydrostatic test of 200 psi for two hours is required prior to backfill. All joints shall be visible at time of inspection. Underground,installations shall be flushed to fire department satisfaction prior to connection to overhead. NOTE: 'Civil utility plans and/or other plans approved, or not, will not be accepted in lieu of the above requirement. - 3. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma City Water Department approval prior to charging onsite underground water mains. 4. All contractors shall have a city business license and a workers compensation certificate on . file with the Fire Marshal's office. 5. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor that will notify the fire department in the event of an alarm. 6. This plan has been reviewed with the information supplied; subsequent plan submittal for review may be subject to additional requirements as plans are revised. 7. All previous comments regarding this project are still applicable, whether listed herein or not. c: file • g:AglobalAfiredepdpinexmltr\NM72 IMl3S a9msoffceAwinwardA72IMBS Iire35 sm • • 3 • • SAL U City ©tfet&units, t11$t3rt3ja I i ' 4, - . 2.8• Ei , Protect Referral • •Meeting Date: Novernber 29, 2000 To: X Engineering Division* X Transit Coordinator* So. CO..PlammngDepr, X FreMarslial* X Traffic.Engineert Sai Co. Water Agency . X Building Division* • Bicycle Advisory:Committee - myCorpso Er:gilreers X P iblic•Fac:lities&'Services' _ Caltrans (Trans.Planning) PG&E Water Reso.irces &'Conserv: Petaluma Downtown=Assoc: Northwest Info.'Ctr. Parks&'Rec:Dept. State Dept. of Fish&Game 1. Jan Tolberi* X Police Dept` _ School.District(s): Graphics X Planning Division • So. Co.PublidWolis`Dept. Other: X F. Stouder From: Bersi Le«fitter Note-K'= Full Size Plans File Number: CUP,00014 Previous #'s: Date Filed: Resubmitted 11/13/00 Project Name: Salvation Army Applicant:, Wayne Miller . Site Address: 721 So.McDowell-Blvd. Address: 1 Bodega Avenue APN#: 007-570-028 • Petaluma., CA 94952 Zoning: R-1-6,500 Phone#: 763-6813 Request: Conditional Use Permit approvai Project Description: The Salvation Army is proposing a mired-use facility that will include religious services; social service_, a residence and a childcare:facility on a 2-acre site Total building floor area is proposed to:be 22,600 square feet; expected bcuildout'is to occur within one.year. Project issues: On-site parking and circulation, proximity to SFDs, proposed uses. The project.has Ibeen,revised since the first submittal in June,— the hours for the daycare Center have been reduced to 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Motdaythrough Saturday; seating in the chapel has been reduced from 200:1o450; parking locations have been revised.to minimize impacts-on. the neighboring homes. Attachments: Project statement and plans. Please review and advise if your previous recommended conditions of approval apply: • Important Due Dates: incomplete.Memos for the Applicant 12/6/00 Comments on the Project: 12/13/00 Environmental Issues: _ 12/13/00 Notes/Comments: . . 1; 1 TLC /1' / ( , �. This department h NO commerts K ICl J l,,-ctk, !a �,t,vn-t✓t.e..er,- � / -- / 7'- t'-'"-0 (If yolk dr rtmenChas no comments,please sign,dart and rearm.a copy of this sheet by the convent due dare.) Theimterdepartmertal n'e,aing is held':each Wednesday it'3:00pm to the Lan Library, 11 English Street kltutterested agencies are invited to attend. We;suggestyou call the project planner prior to attending to•confirm-that.a project is still on the.agenda. Rev. 09/11/00 s:\pi anningkemplate\Profref FLU City of Petai"tiona, •'alitornia • p�� l' i Division ,40., z85°✓ Project: Referral • • Meeting Date: November 29, 2000 To: X Engineering:Dicision* X' Transir600rdinator* _ So. Co. Planning Dept. X Fire Marshal* X TiafdcEngineer* So. Co.Water Agency X Building Division* Bicycle.Advisory Committee. Army Corps of Engineers Y. Public Facilities:&Services* Ciltrans (Trans.Planning) PG&E _ Water Resources & Conserv. Petaluma Downtown Assoc. Northwest Info. Ctr. Parks &Stec:Dept. - State.Dept.of Fish & Game X Jan Tolbert* X Police Dept.` - School District(s): Graphics •X Planning Division - So. Co. Public Works Dept. Other: X F. Scouder From Betsi Lewitter Note: * =Full Size Plans File Number: CUP00014 Previous #'s: Date Filed: Resubmitted 11/13/00 Project Name: Salvation Army Applicant: Wayne Miller Site Address: 721 So. McDowell Blvd. ,Address: 1 Bodega Avenue APN#: 007-570-028 Petaluma.„CA 94952 Zoning: R-1-6,500 Phone#: 763=6813_ Rest; Conditional Use Permit approval Project Description: The Salvation Army is proposing•a -nixed use,facilitythat will include religious services, social services, a residence and a childcare-facility on a 2-acre site. Total building,floor area is proposed to he 22,600 square feet; expected buildout is to occur within opevea*. Project issues: On-site parking and circulation, pro imity to SFDs, proposed uses. The project has been revised since the.first submittal in June - the hours for the daycare center have been-reduced to 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Santrday; seating in the chapel has been reduced from,200 to 150;parking locations have been revised to minimize impacts on the neighboring homes. - Attachments: Project statement and plans. Please review and advise if your previous recommended conditions of approval apply. Important Due. Dates: Incomplete Memos for the Applicant: 12/6/00 Comments on the Project: 12/13/00 Environmental Issues: . 12/13/00 Note s//Comments: . & n , v � / r ' � "" / 00 / �' • x /(- 76, - o v • This department has NO comments • (If your department has'nc comments please sign,date,and return a copy-of thr sheet by the comment due dam.) The interdepartmental meeting is held'each Wednesday at .•li0Opm in the Law Lnhrary,11 English Street All interested agencies are invited to attend.We suggest ydu call the project planner prior to attending to confirm-that-a,project is still on the agenda. Rev. 09/I1/00 - . s:\pianning\template\Projref r. •- 1 4 c" " July 1990 • DAYTECH INTRODUCES • " Daytech Mfg. Inc. OUR NEW NCH"' "ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY , EASIER ACCESS BE _ r Y ry +? i1t;;;er_ii;. - ) M A. 1 y R £14 jy „S S Ilk.,,:_+,, ' ,, "<,_ s,�s * 4 ifiv7 tc: 44 ,ry ai+ "4a > c• Fv r1 r,.f ,44 aY s,.'' iRS {$ W ry , +r ti.. J, 4:1'f s. '0 .L; i"`,,;„ fir{_:„4., i '-. ray .,9,2„ - '= 3�yA '"'?t Sr'G S� ').„.1.7, " ""wv 4or>� +q. • 1 - 'c 1 �3 x ¢% s � d 1 aii- SY M .iv-f Wy4.f .. r 1-: Designed with armrests to aid Senior Citizens and Handicapped patrons . Our new "Easier Access" bench is also environmentally friendly . The slats on the tench 'are. made 'with Sll[Je=wood" ', a new product made from 100% Recycled Plastics.. The boards are a con=intent black color throughout and may be sanded or planed to remove any graffiti carved into the surface . . Easy maintenance and repair help reduce costs . The tubular urmres s provides_ a smooth round grips with in no sharp - edges . They also deter anyone. from "sleepi g" on the benches . These. b=aches provide a positive step toward saving the • environment. 2Z1 T1�orn 4 4�-wG , creAar-a Farf< l ! Y /8727 (7/ ) 6G '- 170 fax (-7/ €) dG7 -/� 9 /2. -7 -9e l `l Ttity on • rear fazlbn, A cotaple of months'ago, Inquired at your office atmat:a new business that tau about to open.in the vacant lot behind my house.,I was told (by Jame,I think her name u) that if it was to happen, within 300?feet of the bnsigess would;be notified and our opinions would be invited:I understood that Conditional Use permits wodWd be required for the proposed"29-hour per day child care center, Pad that public comment would be a port of the process Now,.with nary aipeep:front anybody, the business;ia question is sip and running-- the Community Church at McDowell and Coe.1 eld:is suddenly a Salvation Army operation,.with-chili care, social services,.etc: I've seen no mention of this at your web site, though a receptionist at the Salvation Army operation Usurers me it all has the City's;blessing. Whin s up? Scot Steele Sue Zanotti 1419 Smrkeaiatn Drive Petaluma CA 99954 RFC • 763-027x9(Voice Jr Fax) EI VEp JUN PLAN„1�GUr ��MENP zw Cdr n A -ce td e • RECEIVED TO:?day beater and Naomi Metz 22 Jittso 2000 JUN 2 2 2000 Deur�etsyandNaa?ani PLANNING I)tl'AKTME� I'd like to make a couple of points regarding the.Salvation Army's plans for 721 South McDowell(An 007=57O-O228): • 1)Quelity.ofthe nei2hborhoodiI'm amazed they are eveneonsiderang such an'operationa this neighbtxhood. Traditionally,.thingu lilac this exist in industrial areas,not residcntisi reichbor§aooda. it this is allowed,we can certainty expect our prepay values to plummet--it would be!Bic o ming properly.nen the library. I'm sure that some of the Salvation Army's clientele deserve a tttittl,ifoarth or fifth chance to tred:fheir lives together, But the sad truth is,our immediate neiahbothood is about to take a ruins step&ram in quality, When we asked a Salvation Army representative how long it would be before our neighbors'kids begun tintiMg syrenk,.s%in the street and how'often we'd get.to listen tn01OntS- argue int eparking;let after midnight,.he assured us that his clientele would never,,ewr" create any pr clems:•Butin the l:nvironmettal'lmpst,Questionnaire filed with thee City on June 21, the Salvation Array admits, "Some additional pollee awareness tray be requir dfvr suviul ;rewires.•, 2)Chiid Care:That 5,1$6-square that chill tare center that they want to build almost ri • ourback yard,would be open 20'hours a day,and would have 80 children during business hours, and up to -20.children until 2:00,AM. We would, in addition to the daytime noise from the two plannsou ids, be subjected to parking lot noises pretty nwch around the cluck. • . No 20-boor's day business should be allowed within:feet of a sttbufon hack fertca And then there's:the traffic,the glare of the parking lot,the dutrips er they want to pit next to'my back fence,and so on and on--all the usual problems with a largt:business trying to soutane:itself into a•quiet residential neighborhood We can address all that staff after you've had a chance to look ova their plan. As'you'deal with these guys., please note that they will he to you They've already lied to us about: their inventions:We asked,the Salvation Army's Mr Hoover if we could expect our neighborhood W fill up with shopping carts,and were told they would not be dealing with thetsome s:Now we _ ... ,.. find that one of the fast things they've begun is ceanaelarig for"transitional t easing: Supposedly this =ant not that'they'll be actually housing people,but that they'll just be helping than find housing, I don't think we can count cm the Salvation Army sticking to that plan— they've al ready violated their tanporary pamit by naming an illegal child care facility in early • Tune In the face of that kind of arrogance, well not only have to get agmtanents with these guys, but also stay on top of them to make`sure they keep them. Heater yet..a diffeheut location should be found fox this whole operation • Sent Steele •• 1420 Sarkeskth Drive,Petalusha„California'94954 76$0224 E-mail`752626O6(er)cornpuserve.can •. • �•_ +_ rnucac niu. fl]r fbi 063 Jut. W 2003 12:49F'M P2 Debra 11.Sei 1437$arfa:sian Dove-Petaluma,Ca 94864- - •.... • Fax(707)658:1050_Home Phona(fur)75.i-70&3 • July 09, 2000 Petaluma Planning Commission Fax(707)77a-14498 Dear members of the Petaluma Planning Commission, . It has recently come to myattehtiori that you are considering allowing the Salvation Army to build a large:complex across the street from my house. You obviously don't live in this neightxvhooti. Anyone..who has any concern for their family:or property would never atlaw:this campus to be built near their home. But since its not yourneighbOrhood you must think its perfectly fine to jeopardize my son's safety and my property value. Why should you care about me anyway?Everything is about money these days, right?Not people..And besides;you don't even Imow me-My family and tare nothing to you besides an address that is near a field where yrw,are allowing the.Salvation Army to build. If we're,even that Well allow me to introduce rnyself.,My name is':tiebra So)ka,I'm a Petaluma resident, a tax,payer,.a voter, a law abiding citizen, a Physical Therapist :treating residents of Petaluma, a wife and a mother. In all.fairness, I don't know you either. I hope you ere open-minded people who care about the citizens of this city. Ail the citizens. Not just the homeless ones' Now, please allow me to explain ray concerns. From what I've been told,and from the plans I've been shown, the Salvation Army trying`to put four new large buildings in•afield Off'Moncevell between Caulfield and Sarkesian. The buildings will be used to counsel homeless and unemployed people, serve • free food and provide a twenty,hour per day daycare cetter..Sourids wonderful, don't it? it would • people dayil p re'are plenty ssing IIt arm parents who need to work nights and a daycare that is be a blessing. It warms my head to know provide Petaluma Ioaldn t tot e p need of help_ But it curdles my blood to think that the g open until 00 am would Planning Commission would even consider putting this complex in a residential neighborhood_ Not just my neighborhood.Ariy`'neighborhood. The.Salvation Army complex would attract people to this area There would be more traffic in an area wtrere people:alri ady speed;,up and down Sailcesian and have a hard time turning left from Sarkesian onto McI k�tt.Alas,Accidents'at the intersection of McDowell and Caulfield are frequent. -•., . since the Salvation army;pumhseed the land and the chu ch that is already on it, l've seen people loitering outside the church on the sidewalk_almost everylime I pass the area The type of people that will be passing Through my neighborftood o come and go from the complex are those in need of help. If they are going for wing and free food its SFtfe to assume they;have some problems. I don't want a • hunch of perfectly reamai people parading up and down my atieet so i certainly don't want a bunch of unstable people. I have fears for my son's safety:All mothers do,whether they live near the Salvation Army or not. But I think its natural that myfearsgrea when I learned I may have transients passing by my hair . on a regular basis Yes, I have to warn my son of all strangers. But why would.yo.allow masses of strangers to come into my neighbortrocd? Hann do I know my son won't go out to play and pickup a hypodermic needle with great curiosity?Of course,you that guarantee io these'days that this won't happen anyway, nor do I know tor--sure thatthie Salvation:Arily's clientele.svuld be IV drug users, but it sure increases The odds. I truly hate to stereotype those who are down:and out and need extra help, but • you can't deny that fhese,tend to be people with mental problems'ditsg addihtions, or people that parents just don't want around,their children. Am I going to wake u"p'dne Morning,to find a homeless person sleeping in the hammock in my.backyard?•It may sound silly but these are the types of concerns most people would have,when they learn of a complex such as This beirig built across the st eet_ When my husband spoke with a representative from your wee, she said the city is already Inning an increasing,the police patrol in this'area because of the,type of people the Salvation Army attracts.That just proves that my concerns are valid: Urxlesiralxes who need to be watched by p lice will • • Jtfl. u aiio i : be invading my neighborhood where my husband and I are raising a small child. Shame on you for allowing decent people to be put ln a harmful situation. A neighborhood is only as good as the people In It So what happens when my husband aid I try to sell our house' If the people who are in and around the neighborhood are troubled and in need of counseling, well,there goes our property value Even if it drops a little that is too mill in today's housing market As our family grows my husband and I hoped to buy a larger Petaluma home Now houses are so expensive here that the only way wa can do that is to get a go:II:Lock:a when we sell this house. Are you trying to chase me out of Petaluma? Remember me,the tax paying,,voting, law abiding Phyeicel Therapist providing a service to Petaluma residents'?Tniat me. In the kind-of Person that is good for a city,Why would you want to force me and my family out of our neighborhood aid out of the area by driving our property value down? Ncm, let's talk about that daycare,A daycare center that is open from 600 arn to 2:00arn That would mean parking lot lights shining in our windows until at least 200am. (can think of no one who would Mink that it is acceptable to put such ebusiness in a residential neighborhood: Honestly, how can you possibly consider it I don't care what.kind Of busisri=1 is if its open twenty hours a clay it should not be in aFreoldential armi.That, is wrvaithey call a no brainer, I hope that you will at Waal respect my concerns and those of my neighbors.-Don't allow this Salvation'Atmy complex to be built here Letitia Salvation Army find a nonreth'dential area'in Petaluma for it Of course, you wouldn't want to do that because nonresidential areas can be used for revenue generating businesses and money is more important than people, right?I certainly hope you are better than that Do what is right and decent Put the concerns and sotety of people before the mighty dollar for a change. Sincerely, rfri ce0 Debra M. Sojka • , . • • • • To: Betsi Lewitter 'Prom: SurZthoth Objective (m) "Minimize the amount of noise that future development creates and the amottnt of noise to'xhichithe corar.“:,:nity La exposed," --Petaluma fienerai Plan,page 123. As the homeowner at1420 Barkesian Drive, I tyquest that you meet objective tem\ and roper the Saivatiov A TTIVVIS Applichon for tviityr Crrnrnitinal IJ.ge Pettit/Project Statetnent, filed same 21. This project would]generate a lot of noise: construction,parking lots, driveways with vehicular tradic, a day care center that opens at 6AM and pceq at I AM transitional housing meeting food delri ivees, rerY tc COL be distribution, cleaning and.maintenance of hal idngs, a dmetrnpentastert (in) located right behind my bedroom wtralovv...it seems to • gets lost in the din! The project they are proposing simply does rwt belQn.gilin 3 residential area. l'he residents of this nelOborhood &cad,'cmileml with eithuw. pollution withoutadding another source of noise. Thank you for your-attention in this urgent matter, S)-"JectiA- 41444 Susan'Zanotti 1420 Sarkesian Drive, Primate., California 94954 11, The Desk of Colin Perry 1424 Salesian Drive _ Pelal nm:L Ca.94954 Four<728-3729 • Home Phone 7 07=779-8.119. yam, Em:al CParv([iPetalumaCeil vcor C V ® JUL 2'5 2000 July 25,2000 PLHNNI Petaluma City Planning Conunission Petaluma,Ca. Dear Petaliana Planning Commision, I have heard 'about a plan of the Salvation Army to build on the site behind my home at 1424 Sarkesian Drive and what iihave seen abaut.tins plan does not.seem to Lt in the original plan for this property. It Ed he concerns me as it seems flint there Should:be a traffic study done.for the streettit is on cu I Would think it will,signJicantty.add to Mifflin not oily on McDowell Blvd.hut also.on Sarkesims Dr.as people will he driving around the block to access Canfield Ori _ ?have nther cone,errfas.fl i s is?I l t 1 Tieidnhorborsrl tvirl. i.)t one F_, the kir'.of or*nibton that the Salvation Army seems to be planning:for this site. • Sincerely, Colin Perry ' • • • • • • • �4 ":Fr/?7 r a4f4t �i,, Aid.fw 'k T.0 /% ✓ie& r//-. , r ...� /y r✓ / L✓J l L:i ar°J°NY l +..•^•.f s�da.�,i.r .�.�� i=a/FLY s-+J i✓'dY/ • (Sr zwc_cc✓ faOScC. 77 a f f�J` 70 6At.0977 '4 .4�i¢f y As 7EV/ tlf5 TPA T /aJ OA-) 6th, Ala.Zdui e_. Aggib gar/Lea/aft> , -N ,Jor fry/.�.Z /4',//%s'cd "s2e,�^-' Vii'/4G.. S,e/VC re) o i '2 iU6/&ftS0C/YSd 7-7/21/45 7c c " Deice .cloy e«eA-LC-- ix/ ,� ' . ,28.si,&xiys z: Aeadir , 4i-1S , , ,4 c9. >ez/ Tc rb&.c , ' ,/ v, N /5C2S'- •=5-,Age. /4 Ai Dec, /vim , ', ewe A?sb f c4A Op® • .410 Win. Brian Sheridan 1429 Sarkesian Drive RECEIVED Petaluma Ca..904954 707 775-4435 AUG 0 2000 MAYOR Mayor E.C.Thompson: I read with great interest the August 2 Areus-Courier article regarding the Petaluma Dailey Baptist Church. Our neighborhood is also facing a similar but much more intrusive situation with the proposed Salvation Army Social Center. The existing church with it's small Sunday congregation and very occasional evening activity had no noticeable impact on our neighborhood. The proposed center with its seven day a week 20 hours per day [6am to tam] schedule will have a permanent negative impact on the quality of life both in our neighborhood and Petaluma: The Salvation Auny justifies this • radical change in site use based on an old use permit {which by the way does not exist in city records}. The city must not allow any organization the opportunity to piggy back a new use permit onto a historical use peunit. Petaluma is an emerging urban community, with changing urban needs and considerations that need to be addressed on all proposed new projects. Find enclosed a letter I recently wrote to Betsi Lewitter regarding my concerns with the Salvation Aimy Social Center so you will be aware of our situation. S incerellyy .Yours; . . Wm. Brian Sheridan . • Wm. Brian Sheridan 1429 Sarkesian Dr. AUG 9 L000 Petaluma, 'California 94954 PLANNING DEPAR T MENr 707-775-4435 July 26, 2000 Betsi Lewitter, City Planning.Department 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 I am writing to you because I recently reviewed the proposal for the Salvation Aiuiy Social Center on South McDowell. I have concerns that I feel have yet to be addressed by the Salvation Army or the City of Petaluma. There is a neighborhood meeting scheduled for August 9`h. I would appreciate a response before then, so I know the City's position on this issue. •In the Salvation Army proposal section, "Scope of Project", the Salvation Army states that this proposal is a needed facility for the-Petaluma Community. I believe our neighborhood and Petaluma does not need a facility of this scope. Before Petaluma should even consider a project of this size, the City should be provided with documentation from the Salvation Army and confirm that there is a real need for a comprehensive social center of this size. It is my belief that the need is a perceived:need, and the center will end up serving all of Sonoma County, which 'would make said proposal inappropriate for a neighborhood project. Zoning The Salvation Army proposes the project is a suitable use for the R1 zoning. They propose that conditional uses Article 21 and Section 26-500, 6-409, will accommodate their center. Upon review of the City zoning regulation I have found this assumption is incorrect. In the Salvation Army Proposal, Section 43, Site Master'Plan Concept Social Services and Supply Building, • they describe the use for a facility which is expressly forbidden in Section 6- 401, and as such the Social Service Facility should not be allowed. In zoning section 6-203 and 6-200 Pei witted Principal Uses, it is stressed the principal uses should be for small facilities. Section 6-409 does allow for 2 daycare as stated by the Salvation Army. But the size of the facility which is • proposed, 80 children plus staff, that is opened from 6am to 2am daily is in direct conflict with section 6-200;Permitted.Principal Uses, which stresses small care facilities and Section 6-100 Purpose ".:for a satisfactory family environment" not commercial type environment and extended-hours of use." Text of Use The wording in the Salvation Army Project Statement is vague and nondescript. This lack of descriptive detail can easily be used as an umbrella justification that can enclose any"social services". Wording such as "various community outreach programs, community assembly, overall conception mixed uses, transitional housing, other intervention services, projected schedule, projected enrollment occasional meeting, etc." is not an acceptable terminology for a purposed project of this nature. The city must demand.a detailed description of all proposed and types of programs that • may be started now and in the future. Residence In the Salvation,Army proposal they refer to the "residence" yet give no indication,of the use Is this residence to be used as a caretaker residence or is it a social service, halfway house for paroled sex offenders? These. questions must be asked and answered . Transitional Housing This is another example of a `catch all' program which purpose and use is undefined, and can change in the future,to enco mpass almost anything without additional city input or control. . • 3 • to Issues Parking The Salvation Army has proposed creating 73 parking spaces, yet the church has 200 seats. Is it realistic to think all cars will have a minium of 2.74 passengers per car? What will be done with the cars with one passenger? In the Program Operation,section, the total projected people present daily for the various programs, that are running at the same time, will overwhelm the projected parking. How will this be dealt with? Lighting In the Salvation Army Proposal, there is no information about lighting. This topic needs to be analyzed in greater detail. The center will be required to illuminate the facility in use. This lighting which will be on until 2am or Slater, will have a direct effect on the quality of all the surrounding neighbors. The City needs a detailed professional analysis of the type of lighting, position and impact on the surrounding neighborhood before they consider project approval. Noise In the Petaluma General Plan, Chapter 11., Section 11.9 requires an acoustical study to document that the proposed noise abatement will be adequate. Daily at 2am there will be twenty cars entering the center, twenty car doors will open and close, as the parent(s) pick up their children. Then twenty more car doors will be opened and closed to put the children into the car and then an additional twenty more car doors will be opening and closing when the parents get into their car to drive away. That, plus miscellaneous staff coming and going, plus social conversation in the parking lot, add up to a very negative noise environment in a residential family neighbor, that will undoubtably lead to a lower quality of life for all living in the neighborhood. In the Salvation Army Proposal, they discuss noise abatement. Their solutions are just token generic gestures with no professional acoustical analysis of its effectiveness of a very real problem. The Salvation Army proposes an "incremental build out of the projects as finds are obtained". The city must demand a complete professional acoustical study and the completion of all noise abatement recommendations to be built prior to any occupancy of the site so as to • assure the noise abatement is not built in the distant future when funds may be available. Traffic Congestion In the Salvation Army Proposal Traffic Section, it only addresses how traffic will enter the center. There,is no discussion on their traffic's impact on the local roads and congestion. The Petaluma General Plan classified Caulfied and McDowell as arterial roadways. Arterial roadways by definition are busy. The input of so much the traffic, in a short time frame, slowing down to enter the Center or traffic reentering an arterial roadway from the Center, will undoubtably cause congestion. Also, the close proximity to a very busy intersection causes a dangerous condition for traffic coming around the corner. This congestion will encourage cars to cut through neighborhood side streets. This cut through traffic on collector roads will result in a negative impact of noise, traffic; and will be an • increased danger to our children walking to school. The General Plan requires truck routes have specific routes, times and speeds- another issue that has to be addressed. The City of Petaluma needs to produce a detailed traffic analysis of the impact of this additional traffic load, to determine if the Center's traffic will overload the road system. This analysis must be required by City to determine if this site is acceptable or not acceptable, as required by the Petaluma General Plan. Conclusion The Salvation Army Center will permanently alter our neighborhood. The center, as now proposed with its extended hours, proposed uses, and unresolved issues of noise, traffic, and lighting, will unquestionably have a negative impact on tht:,quality of life in our neighborhood and will be a liability, not an asset.to-the City ofPetaluma. • Wm. Brian Sheridan Wm. Brian Sheridan 1429 Sarkesian Dr. - Petaluma, CA 94904 707-775-4435 August 20, 2000 Hi Clare, It was nice to hear from you regarding our Salvation Army Complex dilemma. It is reassuring that when someone writes to City Hall that someone reads their letters takes the issues seriously. As per our conversation, I wrote Bill White regarding the feasibility of including some of the Salvation Army services into the Kenilworth (or other) site. After a neighborhood - Salvation.Army meeting, I am convinced a land trade for a alternate site will be the only win-win solution for all parties (Salvation Army, neighborhood and.city). If I can be of any assistance in any way, please, do not • hesitate to call or write. • Sincerely Yours, Wm. Brian Sheridan 1111 Senf'By: PEP; 555 1212; Feb-6-01 8:27AM; raye u P.E.P. I* a ErnmmKolhviv;b February 5, 2001 r Community Development Department Planning Division Y.lim Luib.tan City of Petaluma Carg`h 11 English Street Ferri i0'eFhytrrial, Petaluma, CA 94952 Ctaroh United Mcd,atin Letter of Support for Salvation Arm y. /21 South McDowell Blvd. Ch,° h U,dsed Chii,c6 Cd amidst To Whom It May Concern: tit.John'«Epizeupo1 cs„m:n Petaluma'Ecurzienieal Projects wishes to extend its support to the PerAuw Clvidian Salvation Army for-their new Community Center currently under Cburch proposal We support their efforts on;behalf of the community, and sh hole.cat`ol" hope that they will be.abie to continue to provide a much-needed VinceRda Paul service in an-expanded model. CAlmik Chard. �ohnle Iatran Specifically, we have twenty-two one-story apartments for low- income 2-eniors along 407 feet of common-fence&between the Two xa.t,v,utY properties. On PEP's side of the fence is°landscaping and a walkway nn.hpa.a eb.rch to all twenty-two apartments. PEP supports the one-story building Tonulaz a"°°° and proposed landscaping that is shown on their landscape plan. H�es��+-Msn;cn Relict Fund Petaluma•Ecumenical Projects has receivetI tremendous support from A/CR.P. our neighbors in developing;its nine properties; and We applaud.the F.nalwm Crn dina,irx Salvation Army for their plans to broaden the scope of their services. Cu'�w:4 Yours truly, r it/wiz C---1-4/tifrLL-'"Yi Vera R. Ctarnmetti Executive Director [This support is contingent-on compliance to the Letter of Intent signed on ' December 21, 2040,between P:°talurria°Ecumenical Projects and Salvation Army Corps] EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTImlIrf PROVIDER FOR SENIORS&PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 1400 Cuuffieleltme • Petaluma,CA, 91954-44(X) Phone(7071362-233( • Fax+7071.762-4657 edHILD CARE COUNCIL;, • • I �i �� COMMUNITY CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF SONOMA COUNTY, INC. Lh ,; O- • • 396 TESCONI COURT;SANTA ROSA CA 95401 TEL 1707I 544 3077 FAX p07)544-2625 111-4La ikS0110$111 (011111Tni CHILDCARE REFERRALS(7071544.3084 CHILDCARE FOOD PROGRAM I707I522 1412 Lt. Brian Hoover Salvation Army 721 South McDowell Petaluma, CA 94954 Dear Lt..Hoover, Enclosed you will find the information from the Sonoma,County Child Care Needs Assessment done by the Sonoma County Child Care Planning Council in 1999. The Statistics used at that time were the most current available. The statistics for"need" were taken from the 1990 census,but the statistics:for"capacity" were much more current. The availability of child care is becoming a bigger problem than ever. Due to the • • low unemployment rate in Sonoma County and the low wages that child care workers are paid, people have been leaving the field to find better paying jobs. As a result we have lost many family child care homes and some centers have closed. There is a real crisis in child care that includes child care for families who cannot afford the care and for those who can In addition quality care;if even harder to find. Any efforts you make to help this crisis for families will be supported. Sincerely, Marinell Eva Executive Director • A 7 II. . FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following are findings based upon the.Sonoma:County Child Care Needs;Assessment;that:follows. The findings provided input;to the Sonoma County Child Care Planning Council in developing, preliminary,recommendations about future e fforts to develop quality, affordable and accessible child care services for Sonoma County's children and families. Findings . • A total of 29,707 children age birth to 11 years old will need full or part-time care in the year 2000. • The estimated shortfall of child care spaces will be about 7,400 spaces in year 2000 factoring in new spaces and the use of non-formal care for 50% of the shortfall. • While quality of care is of primary importance to child care professionals and parents,there is no common'indicator used to evaluate programs. • The median income in Sonoma County in 1993 was $41,961, about $4,347 more.than the State median income. • According to the 1990 U.S. Census, 9% of families with children under the age of five in Sonoma County lived below the federal poverty guideline. There will be over8,300 low-income.children eligible for subsidized child'care in year 2000. This is 5,982 more eligible;children,ages 0-11 years old, than can currently be served. • • The two greatest areas of need for capacity building are for infant/toddler and school-age child care. • An estimated 45%of children in Sonoma County under five years old are ms:need of out-of-home child care. The estimate for use of out-of-home care for school-age children(K-grade 6) is 30%. Full- day and full-year care is in increasing demand as more parents return to work under the Sonoma WORKS program. • The demand for before, after and summer-care for school-age children will,continue to grow as more people transition off welfare and.the:'number of homes with two parents working,continues to increase. Most after-school;programs in the county have reported a waiting list of families needing care. • Children whose families are on SonomaWORKs.numbered 5,854 from age birth through 18 years old in December 1998. • Location of after-school care is a critical factor because working parents are not available to transport children to sites away, from school. School site care, neighborhood child care homes, and creative use of school busing routes and regulations can help to meet the challenges of accessibility. • The,need for facilities to meet the growing demand for childcare will be a challenge in our community. The need to accommodate the child with special needs will be an important part of the facilities discussion. 4 • • In Sonoma County, urban concentration is found in thecities of Santa Rosa, Petaluma and Rohnert Park. Along the coast,there are no licensed child care providers. Rural families wishing to access the child care or family services located in the cities have a long distance to travel and find it difficult without public transportation. • The Department of Human Services; Child Protective Services,received about 8,200 inquiries and referrals in 1998 for children who had been abused or neglected, or who were at risk of abuse or neglect. About 6,000 children received services. These,.children and their child care providers have special mental health needs to be able to cope daily in the child care setting. Access to mental health services and training for"child careproviders are also critical in this area. • The children of migrant workers 2,396, ages birth through 20.About 17% are ages birth to 5 years old. There are no statistics available which accurately represent the number of migrant/seasonal workers'children.based on usage of child care. • Children with special needs in Sonoma County numbered 9,216; ages birth.to.21 years old.Families of children with special needs have barriers which cross all income levels as far as options around childcare in Sonoma County. Medical procedures have not been allowed to be performed in licensed child care under Title 22 regulations. Medically fragile children do not have a high resistance to infection and group care is not recommended for this'population. • • The two largest segments of Sonoma County's population are white and Hispanic. About 81% of Sonoma County's population is white, compared with about 13% Hispanic. About 75% of the elementary school enrollment in 1997 was white, compared with.about 18%Hispanic. About 72% of the children birth to four years old in 1996 were white, compared with 20% Hispanic. The Black or African American community in Sonoma County makes,up about 1.5%of the total population. About 4% of the children enrolled in elementary school in 1997"were,black. About 2%of the children birth to four years old in 1996 were black. Other ethnic groups, including Asian, American Indian or Alaska native,Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or Filipino, made up about 4%of the total population in 1996; 3% of the elementary school enrollment in 1997; and 5%-of the children age birth to 4 years old in 1996. • Additional data is needed to provide a detailed breakdown of age groups for children of migrant workers, children with identifiable cultural and linguistic backgrounds, and primary languages spoken in the home: Recommendations • A Child Care Plan needs to be developed to facilitate the coordination of child care services through collaboration and partnerships among interested parties serving children and families; improved access to information; and community priority setting. Coordination with the Sonoma County. Children and Families First Commission is recommended. • Capacity building needs to be a major focus for enhanced child care infrastructure development, especially in the areas of infant/toddler and school age care. An organized community effort needs to - 5 be developed to support an increase in available child care capacity in Sonoma County. A focus on - development of recruitment, retention, and education and training strategies is recommended. • A plan to inventory potential useable facilities for child care, and developereative scenarios for use of facilities and available transportation resources, needs to be developed to assist,in efforts to increase accessibility to and capacity of child care in Sonoma County, especially in rural.areas. • Continued education and advocacy with,public4bodies,"and the development of a media campaign to increase,community,awareness around the for all families of having access to affordable quality child care during the early years of a child's life, is needed. • Training efforts in the child care,field need to be supported to ensure thelavailability'of quality child care for all children, especially in the care of children with special.needs; children who, have been abused or neglected, or who are at risk of abuse or neglect; and children with different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. • A coordinated effort needs to be developed to update this child care needs assessment,on a yearly basis, including developing enhanced or new sources of data on children's needs,in Sonoma County. Agencies that have access to appropriate data sources on child care issues, or work with families on these issues in the county,need to join together to support the development of this update. • • • • 6 cf.-• w CITY OF PETALUMA A 4D s 5$ POST OFFICE BOX 61 PETALUMA, 94 CA E.Clark Thompson June 19, 2000 Mayor Janice Cider-Thompson Jane Hamilton Lieutenant.Hoover Michael Healy d/o Salvation Army David Keller Matt Maguire 721 So. McDowell Blvd. Pamela Torliatt Petaluma, CA. 94954 Councilmeinbers • Thank you for taking the monumental task of providing childcare to families in need. In.February of 2000 I did'a random survey of 100 families currently in a daycare center or program Sixty-seven parents responded. Their number one concern and biggest obstacle regarding childcare was affordability according to 28 of the respondents. Flexibility and hours of operation came in as the second obstacle parents encountered, when choosing childcare. Quality childcare was chosen as the • • third obstacle. Each year I have seen an increase in the number,of requests for financial assistance from parents needing help in paying their fees to participate in our Tiny Tots program and summer camp programs. We don't have the money to support all the requests made. There are very few child care centers or in-home day cares that have a sliding fee schedule available to parents. I support your efforts in seeking funding for low-income families. Without a doubt,there is a need for affordable childcare. Sincerely, itetteei (14( • . andrell Recreation Supervisor - City of Petaluma Child Care Committee Parks&Recreation Department 320 North McDowell Boulevard Petaluma, CA 94954 one(707) 778-4380 lm:dr/Nc jan/hoover - Fax(707)778-4473 • U . • > 41E\ 11- CITY • OF PETALUMA POST OFFICE Box 61 �85g PETALUMA, CA 94953-0061 •- E.Clark Thompson June 20;:2000 Mayor Janice Cader-Thompson - • Jane.Hamilton' _ Michael Healy Lt. Brian Hoover David.Keller Petaluma Salvation.Army Matt Maguire • Pamela Toriiatr 721. S:.McDowell Blvd.. • Councilmemfiers. Petaluma, CA 94954 • RE: Community Child'Care Needs Dear Lt. Hoover: I am writing to confirm the:need for affordable and dependable'child care in the City of Petaluma. As the Administrator of Petaluma's Community Development Block Grant program, it is my responsibility to report to the City Council on the unmet needs oflourlow and moderate income residents. One of • those needs,:particularly following the Welfare Reform Bill of 1997, is the need for parents to secure affordable child care as they make the transition from • welfare to work. The need for child care is prioritized in Petaluma's 2000-2005 Consolidated Plan, a five-year strategic planning document required by'the':U.S.,Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).. That Plan,"and "the priorities Community Development u contained within,hm, including Priority #5 ( The provision of programs, projects, or 11 English Street facilities which enhance the community's child care capacity for low-income Petaluma,CA 94952 households, with particular focus on welfare-to-work), has been approved by both the Petaluma City Council and HUD. Planning Division - Phone(707) 778-4301 - Fax(707) 778-4498 Please:feel free to contact me if I can provide you with-further information. E-Mail planning @ ci:petaluma:ca.us Sincerely, • Building Division Phone(707) 778-4302 Fax(707) 778-4498 . ' I.I I • E-Mail. buildingQa ci.pemluma ca:us I. Bonne ' ..ebler . • . House d Block Grant Administrator • Housing Dtvlsion Phone(707)778-4301' Fax(707) 778-4493 E-Mail housing rt✓Jci:peialuma.ca.us - • EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY • ,p c• • ,�, ' Wednesday, Oct. 27, 1999 ARf litzer`ConlnnnityNewspaper— Your honlefownneu°spapersince-1855 • ty {.'- it.. itt ktr sL' ` S7 iJ I 4 »P /^ I -, ' S ,F 1 x s , ' ' }a: r �_ j 't I 1 : r Ftuif . r il , 7, C: ? fI Th x. V{ j d • ek° f � g1 w > t] 1, tit gip' r r G /xi � # (p' r ...�.� r''F $�. ' yt 1 �y G yak {hM ar. °r..?5" r ptl ` ' " sy u i .x ,Y N ct s xh-s� .',:_ Il it t d�. •; x f�irr X `k 7 'r 'k S2 e` I . i t R- ,l=hiSjt] ri a ilk1�,r \ °` .Fr b'Yhgyp� . f�t kL f nJ" �. i_.ym,.y "t b�1�' fC c , 1 , q s 1 i f `wtn�r x ' Y i ' as I k ,*� x'°4 .t3YlJ °(7 .s G )�' n w+ Y i � a w4, d� .� di I k f A) [ I( �. r „INC!, " ,`trot snvtY ' ` b�«Si;ktff i 5 ' s�,a`c-t x-Cay i ip, �(8 k w V �— e'r 1 .1m R1", «m W * C t4�;t�1t }r x , a F m t 9 .: o ;� tli rrydy S:' r �d,.., 'r i i new re _ ___ .Y s--,, .:,,,,.., .e _ n= t [ - 7.t, tea r k.. , _a_., 7 i ,.:-,,-., - - ,, g _. , . s. _ __ . °'Y. t I(:: s 'eys 4 ¢ a ! .� "'£ p. rFyk1R ° kl la ulet !crisis in r„-..,--!: - . .....,,...,, ,, .,,,,, . ,...:.„:„,..„,.. . --4, ® .. in - tvr{ _ 1 _ 7 y z (vex i .. f 0. Y r'f ° d a K ° Lit " "f � j 4y n i r r't �t f f,„“,..:.., 1 4rr i ',, ri r { t • 1.4 41 im P pqr 1. { 1, k n: g d� xl } .rs r S -Sleii�ey 'Fia ';Jr t y; ir'. } § ° 35 M1nJ • %' 4 ii � ;�:. . 1¢, ;l n .s• TI Ir4i ° `"• .r> n, i;i: ,9 i N % /'=w,4 Fu r cv, i4 Fa,a , !'1R„ , p�� S `f t s h 1 1l .f �p� t 4 r c4 r ' BY Elleef1- Md�rr6s L i ' , v =:#'. b ° ',.4,1.0,,,s,,::::,,,,, r r ,, aa, 3`{i k e t <% ,-•,'' " V ' °r a,t. 1.1„ ,d L Argneer.rler Staff. "L a x rL ” y .r e : ''"; n ( :r I ''''-"r `"3 { * ?"� u t • ; i --,- I §r t he high cost of child care, a k. scarcity of providers, and a lack { !it e k i t J'f z �r Ill of standards puts good quality " ` rt "� ` s r °t 1 it Sh ` i. x } its+; e E-i5-7,---•,•,;• .r a c r- �Py k. care out Of the reach of many Y „3„r t s�yt „ : }.. p .�I ] F ..n - SF' Arm y Sonoma Cou-nt families: ; I .,e , - _ .y - 1 b'rk g,5. I z 9'‘;': _ 4 1i i se fb S ,l--v .. < <�.iri S i 9 w , . ^.a<' 4 t s t e Families are doing what'they can and for .,R I i', -, s some =tint may mean patching thin Sao x , t ' � `- 4 ' y.i getheg says Kristine Jackson, co chair of kv r' , m • -S - Council' � ry ' g s 7.S (4Cs). ]]Sometimes that means gettnng,a ; 1, neighbor io watch your kids!hay i.rig an older, y ▪ chi(dwa tell younger siblings,ot even leai%ing �l p5s children at home alone.” n� i.> ( �. `Things are only going to get worse. �, Working parents of more than 7,500 Sonoma " as vk f G E ra fl, h s County children will be unable to find suitable child ;^ , "� t�{, Ff t `r; care next year. ter f , sr�xb Ati- { like ° rya l�d',i rr� � fit t�< rf ' µ ys t+,i,yL"( v t ThatLranslatL'stoatieast25 1>enentof.sornomaCount chi]- °'' i � sv t y I( k f �au Ir k.A., its i .. clren, ac cording to Tamil} fiction of Sonoma oiin—aunty_ t 1 i wl I .,t . ' - l'1 F•= {,i; )i,k° i^ 4^P It x' e P �i tt - - c,., er G.,Id a ll -;r:r:,.E�, yr rq }: . ?,; . i7!afi , �^' d,yl l ae*�,'1rr${.,t�l • • • -8s99-L6S�0u8-C 0!9ulp1oaae'ApuamiJ-surei9oad -uaJU? Ja};u Pue.s1ado{anap.41!M e.se•Xep-e sinoy,uanas siioM za{ez- ewouos-.lsow 'slsoo peayiano spy aql Jo z0£-91;c le ugipy Ialea.putp'9unosuods!yum panlon ajego9au UPD saw;) -ueld uo9Jy -uop eauela 'saouelu!enbae Jo slag •4911 Jo.asneJafl fl of auo ajgel? urea 11 ea 'l aodad saggea2l ur siaXoldwe lag of yueaalno op alespin{J e $uq can Su!gnput _maulApwe'.spuslypasuaarun diem . oidaaow esroyealeyl'sJalooyas I uo U011etwonn alOW ,103 ' osie uea sap!J;%ialuaa-aJeo.plop 'uogejaossy 9u!uueld ueJUauiy-, s'Aepitagl puadsualpl!4JXuew 0123 raid .103 'so?gr4 JnOJ AJana to;. .uaJplr4a 9nnoX.io; stneig 9wgeligeepa,pue 9u1puedxa Jo) ;alp way paidope 'suogsa29ns Ie jestia611;o3so21491-4 agl JoasneJafl;, 1ayaval auo-Jo oput e salepuew d uo loads aq 0121411cm,uo4l+w sueol;1SaJalu1-MOI pue sluei3 Opin 'JaAas Zuppfup111wm ays'lpunoJ' woo;.pue.slllq sayjop,Jo)os ajels agj, 'puy of llnay)!p Aptel E$set.'r(I1uaJJnt yalyM'uotssiiu old 01 pun) sall!U32 ale; P11y3 {)iJ 091 sassaippe ezn05 uagM {0;0012$Swnial'aJea plrtp pue juaJ =nagJed s!aiea Iuelvt pasiaJ fl OD 15,0g solinue,'pue uaJPjNJ e aleaJJ.ol suogePunoJ ordoJyl Lop 1c: : a ueoleunn uo Ciiuow.Jad 000'1$Jano Jam.Aed -Ajddns Polls uauewaip;o IIY"sang { ;o aa4nuwoj AJ0SIApy A1!u ueptid'al en!.rd pue suo!teaod do ana ols aau ,llui'uosnad levy y)uow Jad.LSS'I$ -e1ai;,pue spuau) yj!m sluawa9uei •yL6 -J ay1 Jo s3agwaul Ile.ale Jua-tplM.lpOM OSle uea Sanij I P P sutua oyM uostadsales e';o aldwe ae pue 0020 alts looyaslsawoy aJed sdwoyy-Jape) amue( pue uoj "say!we).awoauraj uJapow Jo-mot pulp e,leyj-9u?Jn)Jnu ay)'ap?load ._za,apl;san!9 uoyay ,(ptuej aJew Plnp,fi?wej:aJea pasegaaluaaiaJea 00)-1 'f:(1¢01-1 alwg eaagwauu 10J saipisgns sl p113 Jd yanJM.ppm; 1PMJaat e u iey1 aalueJeii9 ou ly5?u e s! aJea pip) 5wpUlJ 'sa?p . !Plnja;o Sad Ai u?ew mo;ale J1 by unoa AHD XI!ioIJdSui un e a1eJ n a a e vo e.,ue 010? 09 Ol tm.Jani9aJP V•SLjyenb pue.Aja;es tsgns•fog.A)!jenb o) tl2rioua aood 9utul2al JOJ sayrunl oddo awn P 1 PL,1 l4 ,a pulp atleul of s,upuaJe:Jaylo aaeds aa... mau 30 loo)aJenbs.Jad Jo swaal w asea,pasuaJ11un:,l , •l uale'oiim sagpmeJ asoyl Jo4 aJq e-u!-aouo 'anblun 3u?p?noad ,A).)110,1/4 asp uea spp1JO Alga T$ al00Op sJaumo'.je41 'O aaeds aan+oliolwow Ol alglssodw?si j)• . -9utpu2J;o 210¢1 e;o 'wetly s Inp.ewmaau„sp.-Id/pup-At, a a 1 J s 1' J t 9raua d1' AIJ •- • ` P •s'h.JO uos'>laefiSAes „quay) • aay;O mau i1e o1u1,11!Pq acl Jaiyaa' •;P '4 .1 Poor1 0fl I ,, asneoaq satpisgns aJea path amaaaJ. pluatudolanap '501 )u Sir/X aanti Jppomoiln+sagnue}alp 9u?dlail aiea plttl: JO3rwoor;lerp sai!nbai• :delsnlaneyogMaldoadawosaoJlnq •lou;plm sagrwe;;algt2yO JnoJ;o,Ino 1st?;•agl:9ulntp 1041 spUy luau' in awes 041 le;alu(m saaAuld Alp al-11, : aJ' -ttdw? aJea Ypinp 'siu A uai Jo) 7.- pej slip UMOU -aney •aatyjleyl SalealSaIdnOJJ Aaeaonpe �olanap t,leiq,uo iloieasai.lSalel la algenlen u?elai pue dolanap ,e a)eai3 pp-eip- al•S OJ9..F.1 3 "'PS: 1i.'SALSzalezuOJ„/OialllseM1,„vary 1goid uouue'MON uaJP[UIJ-poplin). 'a4y-stalPP4l Pue slue;w of sawoa sueaw e se ail°pulp aasu?m sfa mopoy .vea£sanly. -sat qne;1 aJra• -ptPJrey1yp!MdINN Pull ug9Sruls -iapun Alsnouas ale sa!p?sgns.ai eS . 7! uaym 1ue1Jodw! Aideinapied Si ojduuaaiow/pn;adiiJ-l;,irogn)us piny a'ljs-uo anet{sluatu'dopnap,' s)uaiud Auemsaas'ayslnq•'uatp plop'etuJo;llejuuearcsltpilelpU!M spaepuejsAjilenb;oeaieauslurp 3ulpuy U!le)on!d aq ll3m saojels!,; .w--:o• opuoa-n!-pue: .;-.r c iede- -p4a'oml Jay ylrm,sis ul ails)'O4M la9pnq e alldsid dnlcrn;Je�l,(aeaon. -LOUIS Al Ilenib_ paauo)ua All¢a1 Jo :' al se ipm se saapea{ssawsnp 9u!snoy awoduriol s elnn{>'lad:p.. Jaws-Ageq e punoj seq ails-ssau- _PVptJe 9uuol!uoyl aJe;lap{ leuo?j' pasn;clap-um ou am aaa47 pnyy I 3 PL.1 czratuwoa.pue• tsnq asap an?de.i`d,tuto jet suado alp O12UIp>.oaae'sa9em;flianod. •aWOaul le101 naip)o l -uo ve set ssauisnp ¢tali et a. asn'J u�rgwaf d ooe equap?sai gic? ails iraynt',(ep 041 io;Jat{aaedaid o1 anocje,(ed sgol:Jmau,slualdoai are). luaaaad 2uyclduJ e jsoa uea DIED{ 9i I d' H ladAlitie Lit 0x20 • sassepJalndwoa saye1•uayl pue:AJel - . J 'a JJaurw ga, 3o nlaqureyJ -pupil 1 _J ,lanyouogacJj eANO 005L A9 n'CPJ9 awg=pn; stapinord aJea,(ep Spill. unlelad 041 ;o ylXsiod aarly, plop. 103 aaeds apnow o1 -Santa'• `uamap111amc+Galr�l leapt¢k-1-nlg lii^+.saaeds i az!p!sgns Jo; 4JUnJa AedAarp awn X,m...Aa Sr5Ua)enueuy , - ''- "•. _ - a111 saledpllueuopay Al!we4'Jead uaJn;sa1lurieJ&1ryJOM”puoJag -gal jo d11 uoouJa)Je Ue.lano:ueamofleH .lxauur 9upspl_sMe-plJOm 010.19lam 'Slslxa.Aauolu ou yaigvioj uop • ••Jo1 Cl e se .,ssano IIIM ails 1¢2I1 sPuaIJJ 1s4 sllal't 'tpoprig yeuueH Je ooya§aid's>1e0 alllll AwU y1!M inq'la9 O1 Jalsea pue 019 -mils e-paignop agip1 Paau 111m -?xau a.tow.ale.salpisgns AlunoJ uaJputp awoaur mol: Joy saaeds me raunup-sn9,tl/uauzsrm14 2'00-7 r .paljoaua uai pulp paztpisgris'Jo-Jagwllu aqd; uaap.. s 4 '1 VL...y/-1• Aiunoj ewouos 86h Aluo.heaA lse"j -wp 00S1L imp JOl saaeds al 20.20 s - � '+ .weiSoad 11¢15 PEa'' 0q1 JoJ.,C;!IPI1b of aney p?ni A1Ul10J:iyl'Paau 0007: 1- 17'v l ° ” W .< of 059'E1$ ueyl-ssal Jo awoul ue Jea)\ 141 11!1 01 JapJO u1 `1snJ ,.,ey u . , �,Jy - , ,;','!.:1:J. df '' ` altedltr, d, -a-d ^s 1C* Y ^ f, amv)sntriaan11JOAltwe3y'anyauls 'spuy'ludo.'sallye l�'J vz+Sta. l G , X12 e J �4S _a J:aiow•uana ale Sal prsgns ludo -aN Alunop etnouos ayl'ale.]plop q " a-r eta, r F ` >A oltr 'Pc-L 441,..1...e". i„ -paJ •,(lun°J.ewouoS Ill"sa+ptsgris• 1_11.••sasI rl aa.np Alleai ale aaala•s[J r „rlr` t 1 �x + a1ca rnJalcls avaaaJ❑aJ na 11110 lr t +rl ; 11 f P HI l 006 Al 0 k eI„,. .. ., $?�t s.g9 > r' : el `5., ,o n'p ,i ynoge (loo ieaA lsel 68£.SZS Molaq sj' ill a J eluou0 ulsls!Ja 0 r t'' � t^el c'`4 e� .4 t` ..A :;,,,sic `iA 1. adieu' 01 Paau pinOM aaii11 Jo .(I? J -nom f n R 1 l }.l 4'• s { .vaad .natu 'b 3� � , ^K 1�-?r J'+ s ..�t ter! ; � +�d tp � & -weJ e a)cir cxa JO) sal!tl.n JS al ens * ){" . 2 r'.. ar` .p,` .,r 1W-'. `,'i', "101141;"x,+�'Sr^ t.',,•r,,n, �Y ''JOJ,pitmb el la p.m Ul-sayruiel 10 lsa 'rug Mel.ayl (Ir,ct say -nJgJamai• '� ur, i . ,plq ';'.,y ,+ + r ,lr� 1 i tx� , ; -ti a . -lood,Gan ay)JuJ,(lu0lnq,alge�+ene pey traappy, alit asne_aq A11 sou1 nt`t` ' x t`;�24 I '7, '' '° (•,' i L F� '�n1 �t t`y" rljnFFtt {- srslsm Die]pi it Al nu e aands sfAed 'El 'aJ in pulp t) a 1e ( f , ,.. , ar : FL.I to I H-F. lJ 64 1 h r i' 1 • j 5=�a� `C uea,tatlaJUd,eleJaluaJS;Jietau uo 'ads re of ,(.+ana JOy leyl { •f I d 1 II I Fe f t. d l 0 r r I- - - Pal e FI1 .1` 4s: t aPI uniiAue pug uea Say! polio;°0561c"11 01 so96I;41 moll f ,JR, 1 k F j ,5de. f F t .I1. . 'rr f ,k �s ;l' § -weJ,Cluoo),(uew'AlaleUIIPuJuf1 sp!1 pagaell 14a1gtrc Apnls let ( f"3 j . a,S $ . `�.: K ' 'II!.t .r ' , 'luaumolrnua -mns V 'age 9unoA e le pooyluf `rF nFyr �. ,py�M1s ';,. r ! , /� y Ji rA li 'CS,Git §. Aawoy e put.syooq;o jai-11131.1u a9Jel.. -Jed alelJapun of Ala1,I ssal pue '' g{i irpitA'e"{ S kR MJ h „'t r • —r ,�6 • :a ;� .,F�a 1'J .' "q��' e aney Aayj _juawdwba Geld pue. a9al oa iea(-.mo5 e pualle 01 Xi, 1141 •F �y` .i_F"r e` a J a �, �., .,/, i nJk n� $'l, a'lel Pue uap e`0 spry S P sdip play -iaq Pip a ea pun{al 0009 pnuaaaJ v'4rt ' . `1 -k 'e- F ,,,�'mmmmmmmm"ssss,,,,��... , rn' `.mt.. "r' �` - J ) 'F' \ 14 .Acp e smog j['uado aae:Aayy-sun oym,asoujl 1¢91 puma]il'IZ 10 2u,2} ts.I^Ite '�' 1b 4 `i,,.�a 'Gr .'..r a 'R `' "1 'Fd - -4i 7'"".+h�i".4)4"J. 6L Pue it uaam4aq JOJ ai'ei.aaAojdma, at jj •131 Deal Aat 1 nun uaJpl!I D . 6tdai a-f:e ,Its;x'1$2' &rr a'. t a', 1 ' t.^412 * s IF c FJa r %"saksti ;II F s? pue oo as ul aau'.(pm Aat 1 at a, ae.1 ,( nr s at io e 1 ,� ,, , 4P H'1 4 P Il I Il P 1 l F 1' 11, P JJ h t� tc s 4 J h A i k 1 ys•'S4-r sy c'�{2{ e '..'. t" !`} t; fAitS; "tF, Fi s a � .i� V F 4 F ' iA_ kl"a°� J,, ,,NIIr )"`i'g t'�;4,t leyl,silk 2dt and aJSa9J�e-a 9u�ooA runup io;uaaJtisa Arm Il• ' 1 t la',.l ' k. rr +,v a- ,, - t r t nJ is ><».� k��"s. is+ 7 )epos a4l OI P 4 -... JP F --1°F F.z°1)1+'G �iJ t r; � %�."'t?t u, 1&1{ '^-1'.4.;1.11417.1 y{ ui,,, jSIFFi :ni ,FF yF•t� F JF ,` 1 i+ a# P 3 'e tfe:11,1",aH t?t 11Ikt us1,�4 jaq awn lm 5 P�H�Jawlo)e pue- ua.1P1 4J{J�G!lelJO y lUj_ anZLfil .i A , R y h k 3A..4t.n ' ,ry y t "` J , 1 xa rr Platt ',Ala � r" t' `G''. Jayaea)paleyuapaJaesl pieyau,j w sdtloJ9 0M1 0111I s'Ja1PPo1 pue 1 1'Jx k F t , 1 F a F, i >S i t ¢ Rte+12'12 ' ", F a r JF tip F,y sJMF riL. y x ` • a rM1'k ,Jt FFZBJ� kut� �v'li+15'. - s a. Jo .$u! aswi at slue u? Jood l[[ Ftapinlp oafoad a u at. fz z J is .4, . S u ^ ^ d ., Pen 11' J 111 7 1 1 J;i,-,i+" 1 � ^ q" 112 'Jd' kixti' X,� I ,':4C 124 k s3 s4j16.1,1 I` i J ti 1'glps' yW11111"` r `u2;1 e4,L.Janouury9lge S alatp.Sia./ ay.1 :ulmp,S,ezno5 do yJ1q UPS w e n. x ' tr - f, ,LEt` "F; .1 F F 1` x ,-r,grl."t:e -uaSJaJel aql y]1M..'louuea s3aNw lip ltN,ur lJalol"{ueuepaaagy ayl , N i4�„n,S ;., ` r . ` :'^jai°'hl a'yr,� a „ a' t " xv {', 1 F1i 6i ".lab'Nx�k Ja9Je et ! 1 ens e.sa rAoJd.aio tool J asea ar s2ul ulc • 1.44,19:::111-1..--(•.:4•""rye t ^ 4s .Y: $s e o- n"5 t;,,,;ti 3A 2.11 I "aI`i'a t 1 fi All 4 P. J J IZ'1 O P 1 P 1 t i F r' i•f w `.F v L J .Yis ir'ss$ is't ' rF-zF ri(F F,c�a�1 4tH 1 -.� gaup pue al el 9u!o`d ailj uegl�allaq 1 -uo!1JV Jo 1 J nos • Fw 1111 r F fv F >f rR b r aaAu dwa auo se sAed a n a5c epu et sties 'ew,o + e ul Sls,c r.`F4 a a ai,-: "tom ' F . -j' r "'ti7�lsJi9f',i Jf`11'IF�9 " -t 1(F+,:r $ F'FMjr,d 'I� -.lane A)unoJ ayl'edit auo u"ft !Dill suosud Auew oc aney 1,11 I'D u! 1 kaa-e.,^a,:v„ke x F, r - 1 "n-,1 , )1014 111-r. 9r "ie '.P r i J'=, • 'aJea aul1.111113 Jo t uow lad am/P;1111-1111-1 tae a e nw1 s Jue "e�y Il a - : r t 3 , a t 1 q'�?"'I ,)� a "rs. ll J It 08SS { Pal I 1 I "li} n�rF'V'^f K F �r t , ,� y r " 01.4„12 ti�`eh ,'yivitt i 1(tx+l sq�'��i�. i,j4..«4,41.0 .'Ikmktfp,atllr 0. 1 Sa3Jelp Onunlelad III weJ9nJ�l ad e.7 Pa9ualleya sem 1411 ,(a na pi .001 k04.''f "l\e ajt F z _ i rr 1 -:i t jara 1,kh.t [;'. 1101%448" � ' 4'411 r,'J'-'�`i' ,�+ ' n PI"' oo asaJ Je 9u!un 9'1'0¢0 aJe s 4+, all l'241 f -'w.y g J s 1 'i ) 'tt yy1,.2i4}1 tt�rif,441ia1Fr r,,,; Vir ,ryl'jr t != PI IJ P 1 4 cI 15 IS I I Y I ll 9u! 4.,j,i 10:4 /4 KY.x I.'a-� �5 4 ' a�, nk t \,{• JI51:1414`11GU91 0. 1i#fj El�J >:}9 tt 1 f° . -:}o.JOleaadopaumo'pa eyaucl goy puelsaapinr rep of awoa Panel ei to:r : 4"e 4 r v s•_: , , t ':a r 13 i", 211111,'-.n ` ' 1 2.1 of `; i;< a- suol0 an!suadxa lsoul,s alels aiduail�lncl.,ayejs siill ui'a9apua 01 ^1" JQ 3§x1,14-11_, ` F F x ,J I r .O' A 12 12 .` ,�'ir'I&4';‘",,..i:r x m ytM`1y .: 1 r,ix i,s.t MkIt l au o auo OF aaeds o io e s,le uaut rwwoJ e anew a a e+g l + 12 1 r ' ° w t Er Eqi, 1 :,r 'iI�ta Nib { r : II ; l I 4-l. 1 1 1 M„ 414;:r.'a z t g!,',....1:1:1: rlr - (r , ` ! x.34 ", ' '`"-21;;”'l "..,',/ `J.r "tt J' i' ' ''.11.t.414110":01140101` s1-] laa °Icubs Juu stiaaatrs euo,ssaodd n1 r t s t f Y x 1 { .. ' r IOFIa a no 3 OUT.' I I J sr"r i i,. aF, (! 1 7J. x r• '" :r'"ro M1'�`,_ F{4:44,:+yy, :' " n7ir : „,r ri llio.5� , I s Lr r{ i#r?ievir ? 10'01'12 Pal aJenbs 000'1 e Su"'an] pua leIJOS 'alwa'4eJe Jo JolJlpaJd lr Sn `"4`4.;' i+;';' j klt{F� ax t` i t:`o- r ,,f:.°>t` 11,1: fi, ,_ ~' ;,,x^, 1 14 'f ;;; it a G i &FFFg%..1'M_iF 11241 1001 p1!ya (l£ SwAtas Jaluaa Jill cut e St DJ BD plop Any cub y:by 4 �' 1at ',la FihI. t't1 r 1 „ %,"'Fka..' c' re t i .. ,...r`4n 1331:)1'4151,{p.?d%igi lti`1.1125 t 10,,11 e Jed •0a06s Joopino Jo Taal SL Pue 1¢41 9u'Mons so!runs wJa1-000] � 121 ' i c,� 11` a a tPrt t '0 / °r F11k)�'i1^'t r B i iL^'# s'^I Jad aaeds JOO tun a ra verbs 1°°-11 el t o an un\ e Se awl awes P �ttFY aFJth'•1.1 k�rp; i .h)) car u { r , s r'FF. J~ " 'W Gtiv x f- 2.; r '0w'Fr� e F sae uew al at 03 ea tasu a:A Jf!1z ii Yuepl 0 ry'fv v ' :* £` ' `3, 1 a ' F ' r t t I't` n4 rl aakt:u t10,01� '* SF, lP I7" I .I 041 le sauioJ „',(1wrOJ ewouoS x t !. F Ft ': lle pn`i.ttuu1". � 'a :,5f*' t ° s c * F 'tCn° ttl' 1' astc3alu0J .10 '5011112A A Jada,d Jo sls1- 0111 ale J o TS t;t th,u-a n F li -" ua .., ' s_ r ) .`. uu, 5 . ' a P I 3 ! l Jl UV — J4j `I�" i "'�''r ' •ti e. ,s zh r^ t <rz > 1 .. '. 7 P 1 9 n1a :saw] 21„ c 1)FGV,o oTset Ju ayl JO lied �sayl ea 'palm '110 IaJ ayy ...., ... •yluow dad '1 -noN uo IounoJ tSY$:aOeiaAuuo sal ApgO11slsoa AID eunquiad 04) 01 10(130 saw04'0103 ppyJ',41uow dad£8 fl Jo; suo1ePuawwoaal pue -s00! - a2e ate•uo 001043 51011103 ?IUD -puy nay1luasald suollez!ue2Jo • _ pulapuesloogas-aJd'pasuaul1 • aqj 'A1 inoa atp ur asea pltya _ a9 eJa lie uo 411-16w.ra60E9$ 121! „s!s!n lard) ayi„ 9wl!ulap - , `° aOJeyJ-oP4Jnlmaso4S'pu1e,0123 1123 slug 'llodai e pasealaJ sale 4 : . - , iue)ur 103)01 Loop slal1a3 AlunoJ 'uoilay AI1w eJ yllnt oag1a9o1 • • T abed WW1 • n; ,11013.2011 oacrl 8,l e'OWII10r - • _ IOU noj-s F J1! Viln+InJaFj— ip • t 0 • • • • • • • 1 0 — -,,a(q° w w ro ••❑ q❑ n P,3 0<m w �� 00 �*I 11 11 ■'c7:.o o,,rn,.0 0 a,E".g o ao r � E 2. EP ,°' a Ls to. CD 0.'I .n d� ? ',� ° ''.' sr x 4 , - rrr .'":c. ? wad 'a� C' {y � mao Q' co ° g rop� R 0col o'r. n o8'cn wb ann ,o ii *) r "+ Y + ? . IS .. '� BGot`Ii mg w. 4. nro G, m._o ❑ mg ° ° rrom oia � t1o'.'.PDC, wgP, ❑ ° � hoti "' r5 . ;Met'. F 'F a�4 : ,q rn(Th. O �. r^ ro m o ca "' n tw. 'ol -� w ^ 5 o '$ P'i 5'`d ^ a o 4r° C °n e7 °• r�"o •n.'�t ' _ ;;_r° o ° w• p 1 tk' v v r * 3 � .•vro o ro n 8 ro vo rn o yc�! acs a' -yi a m n� ❑ �'., E p, m.,a a o o v, 0 s ii}>�: 7 j _ n x- }!i tel 7 E ro int ❑ " •^1 0 ❑ ❑ o n o, o• EE„,-.n 0 .o 0 o. ro n ro n.a co ro 0 E' ns .'�u„n,tzl, S �', i'• 1 -, ro d p?ua EEr o 0 o. �'n o"cn ror„ v,rn o m b ua r .r,, s , fl: �i: I o.E3 q o w tl 0,Ei' m ryo! A ern pG, '.ti K b a:a o B o P'• . c'T ion 'o.,.., 0010q0 ' '-. o c m` w b to �J'r ` aw}s : r + t,x'.t :.y o ' ro ro p rRHD E 0 ". "-- R, n ` a`< g0•112)r' -n , �'o w a .•o n o o n ti a j' h a '4¢"5 ,1:',1"F.(14..-41 ro - 0m E'ro ❑<< m < b a m ti A 8 G a o a ° 0 0 0 rJ a a E' < E: a. A 4 114 .. "c'1-..v x •,xv t y (? v'• E3 „,144;,:r,...-or x c e ro a e-ti ti w y� �. �. ro � ,.I t.', e'i 0 00 .». o • a n n o P:.. .rnn E1 8 E?: � g/)•1 ,-, . c r�yl ir-1. s co Cu ro m ro r� row w or ❑ I M a co m b Ei 5r,m e' �'n',..J.,Ei' o w.m i , ° 13 `° •w n w 9.w - •• ,+itt ,� , a J F 1 s . z -+y ,b� n�. Q' E'ro' �P. A E� c' m m a ro 'd.A ca 0`< o01'7 n C,-�' �vr° � o °' ro w ,vro' m,�':.. '� fD o �`o m ;.-_- n p , T•1 nFi it f:, t �� • :pi' = 4 -=ca 5' o. o .°. oa.. o• ❑ir„ - g ,wm 'g' mmEpq'nRo',m'e � ' .i, E`°•'.ro- omQnig0:000.9. a C � /41:„..:.° rr ,� 1 i in t E3C,'a .v m.0. ru4' Frg rudw.na0m . ti0 . U1 • • 'p. N °O A .n... C m C n N N 0 n p� m5 a , „ :_,51' r°O Oy Ci O r3 i"� �a .. '1- o..vo[pm , p'. ♦v. �� 1-81 ° ,. rn o ro r, ro a, ` ❑ m ,f2.. 5' ,,A;xtttgil - . O.0 N O - C o n tl pP, O C 2 pp n �C? .o to ^] w^. O' O g b i,39,y, ,,,p h �l �.n O 6 6 O w n E. 0- Q N ❑'� d e'1.C ^J ❑ n ro H'0 b r YAJ�1"y} �.�'� ,•ri i � n . ,ryry< (1l �'E:.-.•rn o❑ [i 8 (y� 0 o p F� rA a. fro` �: o n •m1 0 1-+ yt t Y�{' 't�F°/ n'' L.:B Q a;'. qrY ❑ �.t1 2 ,CD °g '❑JO' �.::a. p ry0 o ^I-1 Q b b o o 1iPi ' 9 h/{ 1'4. It$ N py m m ' O .w. ro q Co m n o"C r� o-, N rn °o M. to,'` -o` o y 1 ,.';z' s " , t Yi$'YNe w, ro0rn nyro < o:0yoa,, Mm-.d•< Copcp, ,< E.< p '< EY n O~ f •. 2. 'O a' -..m, ro ° „•,,C 6 p`.y ro at, X N n P, C O 1 y. . . O en E N 0 _i �r 9. HO N N G , 6 .0,,< C O w a N C 0:9 ow_ c r' m♦s y r x 1 . . 5'>�':c e ° 6.: o,00,�'-`Er' ;< as at �' r°, °m° 9 .7n- ' k� • a•0 'o'po ru � bE _wecp, . R: oc � 0 ° `-0 Roo gym , ' ; ' ro fn o C '? .-y a a n PD ao y ❑ O E' n ro o 51 �y f#i K 5f ?Y 1.'tom , -. - - �.uw Yp, u tl'.�.b' n�m'u - .. d ^t' s" l yi1 - `.� • rU`tY'.° 'C - r'i rJ O „yiJ; ill �v G- $p t-! > {p� • F I• � .g.,. E O 'O Q b•- y -, N w d b OO V w'.d ,d ro0 •Y E �_E. 10 6°',. p y j "" 'JY vti r , rn 'w'< ❑. .., a o~'c'ro ❑ nrnoa •-.h,1-1io m n 03 `7," Id =. •g �' C' •�3{,y L , `> 'R.rj � n..m a o ,,, m ,'<N'... roror-.•. ,-i,00 - 0,pp, ro . 0.• y G 5.FNN°” p -.$, i ty U o O C tl 'on,..<00 V.' h el Q g ,o v `° f 4114.2.; �' a'� ro ^� ro orov,,'7 �rr,{eo'v.- ��?? r° a) Po,, o C, S. rn E $&•tiv x r 'i L 't CD' Y„' �' ❑ m w o d it ja7- �>r rr+ a:° g w 'v NO ° ° �..� N- R o ° E.... . „7-, 8.w E i G' o ! '..i ? ' r r. o ..''mss 6' r(n o❑c C, m' o.m v, r°'. c: ..-. Dmg p Ewe. . .e�1n..,y 11,4 • ❑ oori N'a °06b EIQ mQ pmeia lc C E Et ic-4 : �. I :rl iYi,r -- d,. E o m o n,',rvi bbb .° oo cont Vo•coitg' m N5 O', pEWr • o r r .,. . or n A ^'r< r'" O ro O• C c.. n o w pE �.ro n b n r •' R j o, �, rnE'i °❑ o tito C:M°..' d 1- d'iit 0. • y w E. n n vl b] t7 to °ter ••' , r r 't c ' • F n t1yiN�t.„ ! f Fr 9S• Ei ro C ° a o (T p, n l 1 q 7�4 " � y r .„ L 4q • P ,, ` ,,,,,,,L,.12 SC d i !iks .$ e r• as ao < w C C'� ti r9 ,< r-. a.-1 S./ �r la 5 3 1 `'R l� yd it i wJr 1 I�I' 4Y: ' I 1 wv •t; 1 'i• W n O n ❑ R g 11 ro 0 S.y (� lV E „' r 1 41 'il F 4 i :s '° f d �" i.'~k P- c 'V t t �r tY n O o Fn = i✓ SI d4u `•n lfl y*al r - [< ry (� '-, 1 ., a F) {J, n Ifs Q O �1 N w a.. o .y ❑ r -. )♦I I { c 4 4 i ,1'� a S i' c t T ro 0 G C In o. y , 1 i r� M n s 'k, -f t } 4 1 N N Im w O0 o tc' ^' N E. ri. �' n .., A'C su. X44 t: ,� t s, .F i1) !I t µ } r CD it3 '" ,❑. ❑ ❑ 9 G. •, in o s'-l'^J'f r#axe•f a+ ur •c s'tic..L "u4 1 )k at .rn r tt•t Y.' �, o m G 'o w a ^w n t r t r�y t• T rI` ra>n t 1 r h t <'o rn d .+ 'r 0 n �' < ,,,i tsk'x, r A'r1,r Ly >'s ! s F .,,, ti f # O a w Q co rj� N �' m w w o Cf] '• y '' sy ,� ,r� rt : `". '$ .�F" xs..sl �<� �, r s ' t K -, 1 *ii r, ,'Is 6 C co " n P?. r ro o " rZ� b 7 o~ $ i w•�` c115•1•.:. x k ,�•5 y ' � 3 5 t w F: ff .[a 6 r,i O ❑ ❑ ❑ .J. W �k q "1✓ Y L, '}n' aM�y- lu.I r.• C 1 S t ;.1....A..... Y R^� - w 51 0 (U Nilo O ' ° 1 F in Ix t "i'...5;" .A 'I.*: f 'F q yi,. t r s a `' . 0 ., o. ° O O. 5'N. O ry et \ 6cy �,R l „- Y;' F) tr ° ° _V Ult . 1{Y 1'' w iMJ f'fT'" ?'' . SI i '?d-,...t• 1!flI!C('� Q ...' rA �'® r ..".' ` '�nye;.ffl 1 U'i'j l , ? 77 "i.h .>...P?j F-. o sb o cn ro o r 'rrl 5 w s+..".•s J�v, 0'-.0- G( E ri' V A F �* � ° a. c ro�O ��c ° Etna, - ° w '11 1,• C31 di 1- Cl. E' ° E n a: i t o 1.1 O. • -C, N ❑ti, a' �<mi o n,.< a 'i7 t.^. 0,a ',D g w w `o ❑ r° n 0 w w W w. , �m 'U �,ic „ E c g n ri m n 0; C,. .c w b �- 1 s "Mx NA• ? / ° 'C c 'j 1 .. n 41 a5 ro'C 0.:�ia w 0,rl a DG w `< �. 0. <° .. a{€ >,. r:V- r " • r ' w tN 'O xliw �?o •." E. ❑ n n 'y n n r01ot m -s b ■ i •L. s 4 y ®'"t s -;.",r:::...''','--.a A�` . b w =ro w,. N n ❑ C rO N y. ':` ,e ,,,g ':::.,....2;;i; a a.F r .r` r k. � hi� 4 A yr r 1 .Er C� 8 +Y i +a i n ro$ a , l M t Fi ; s„ .a p!8❑ o � �ro H.o �ad � °cC n,o p o q 4 n i f S M / r M t 'Y G N O'qQo� ^I q'.� v+ . 16o�4r0 n. 'gWo niUg mo b{ JI -- tS' t�,..e g, ^'t I jSF}•+ _ �" 'U:o n n y o W 5,, 2 en -I w ❑ „ cm 5 n } . ',i'.J Ir tr. ¢ tk€o'p "# #aw,w 1✓ v tl Z' e Pr fi n p a' Z!r„ l� id y n n °a.ro po. 0,0 a O Arr M,3 P. ( 9n 74 r] q ry 1 �,a w❑, 4 o (1.;� j c g ° .5 n g, m.c • rl°'fii �y t � v'�1 arr ., v' k . 'r°<o Co ❑r, ,-;; 8 t`Dn c G O �;'r�, `. a K' F' + x ' y " i •� . �` o' i -4.-,'•:. ri. 'e IrF �, tp{ 11fq 2 °S _ r °' ha t P. n w v.o �� r ! F,: = C3 A. > 1 :p- \ Z 'c,..,,e { ,a ea xx# ' , 3, r z � � tl ��' k +l° : !r N ,J .3 1 nr6. 9� }. t w 4 0 0 o o. `a'a 4%,.� c' 41 xY t: a S' a 31 y { t r Gn �, �# �F:s `�h } 't m z c.,, o 0n, m L ,ht R. n C9 t9 n n ip'{ .#a 's; ° 1N' 4TM li 1#i.e r ., t o ='— o_ .b� 4i CO @ 9J 4 ac on N to N o ti = rn `~° z R4{AI naw ''.1 r a# I" I�,.if rI tr'' L co V..2 Q1 Y J f 1 ' 44 L 1 ' i� � tvv E o _co= o' a n � I nna ,D d C v It h{ ./ r _' t ..L _ tit Ei; ], m a F rte,1 C N O pl nn °, O y oN cn d. v tF 1} 4t, a -',..;,.,..0.T.- V r i m .-, m vo'_ ro a y,o a:r.:rn _ S +.'tdil.,i#. 13 r S*� _w r•a'. `�' -3- 3 a - a�.o ^' � � °, Q '° ° 11'Fdc"1 d. I�ri °�ii� t L}fy'''Cta.."`.4 ts"1' 't ' �y,' • co ' Ill P13 o n n= r`°il c> > `s °� + Y F �#r1 1 r ,}#4,f of t, .,tt,.-.'4 e+. ; ry - . m _C i F r 5. . , , a 4 s 7 • I - - - - t , ,. Hunger in Sononia County° k . a F A. Comprehensive Study i of the People Seeking Food Assistance a Executive Summary a. I' ,n a a - f s a ,, f IS) —N University of.California - REDWOOD EMPIRE • Cooperative Extension-Sonoma County FOOD BANK R A-7727-c-rlitf` A) L 7 ' i Letter to the Community In 1986, three important events occurred which had a "This is a very rich country We should _ great impact on,the problem~of hunger in Sonoma provide food for, children because they are the future of the country:and forthe elderly County. First, the University of California Cooperative because they can't help thenzsewes Extension - Sonoma County published the results of the first local hunger survey ever conducted in California. A 60 year-old reared woman who Then, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors ap- lives with her 85year ola mother pointed the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Hunger which ; Both are on limited fixed incomes made specific recommendations about how to address and need supplementalfood from the problem of hunger. Finally, the Redwood Empire rood pantry Food Bank was founded to provide a.central clearing- house for the collection and distribution of food in Sonoma County. . • This flurry of activity in 1986 provided the foundation for the growth of charitable food assis- tance programs during the-past thirteen years. Not only has the Redwood.Empire Food Bank grown considerably during this time,'but-food pantries, soup kitchens, and other agencies have also grown to serve.more and'more needy people in our community. One:of the goals of this survey is to compare the present situation to 1986 in order to determine how far we have progressed in fighting hunger in our community Perhaps a more:important goal is to provide information and today the groundwork for our continued efforts. • While reading this report, it is easy to become disheartened when one sees that children are still going hungry in Sonoma County. Other statistics regarding the struggles of working families and the number-of seniors seeking assistance are also reminders that the problem of hunger is • complex with no easy.solutions. Yet, we have come a long way since 1986_thanks to the support of the community and the hard work of many people committed to finding solutions to hunger. If this report•can be the catalyst • to get community agencies, government, businesses, service clubs, schools, religious organiza- dons, and individuals to work more closely together, then this report will be a success. Sincerely, . . 7 • Linda Garcia Michael Flood Director Executive Director Sonoma-County University of Redwood Empire Food Bank California Cooperative Extension November 12,1999 • 1. Introduction It i time'once again to document the currenrhunger situation and to determine what has changed since tl lease of-the first report. This evaluation and analysis is critical to decisions regarding future e orts. • The recipient findings of this report are based on a survey of 238 randomly selected recipients-at food pantries, soup,kitchens, and shelters in Sonoma County: The survey instrument was developed by the - ,University of California Cooperative.Extension and has been pretested. An earlier version of this survey instrument was used for the 1986 hunger survey! The findings of this report raise some tough questions regarding the future of food assistance programs and the needy people that these programs serve. The findings reinforce the fact that the issue of hunger is complex and the solutions for this problem are notnecessarily clear-cut. The 1986 study proved to be a starting point for discussing the problem of hunger. This hoped that/this report can provide the basis for a renewed discussion abouUthe:state,of'hunger'in our community. • Recipient Survey Findings The survey of recipients at food pantries, soup kitchens,and shelters included questions about the recipient's household as well as2-questions about other individuals in-the-household. This section high- aits information about both the hOti eholdsand the-individuals-of the households seeking food tstance. Who Seeks.Food.Assistance? • 47% of recipient households-are single or two-parent families with children: - Two-parent families with children -37%- ' . --Individuals (living alone) - 30% - Families with no children , :12% . ' - - Households of individuals''not related '11,%0 -Single-parentfamilies with children 10% Length of Residence g e ll individuals.in the --- —_-T--- --i- - .-_.;.— ------ Takino into account a 10 Years or households, 40% Of all recipients are chil- Longer dren.while 8% are seniors: • . . - . _ - . 5to.10 Years - 13% are children age 0-5 . . F4 3 to 5 Years - 14% are children age.6 l2 13% are children age-13-18 r ,._; 1 to,3-Years Ilp - 52% are 'adults age 19-59 - 8% are seniors age 60+ Less than 1 Year 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2 • What Are Their Sources of Income? • The average monthly income for recipient-households is $754. The breakdown by source of income is: - • Source .°70'of Households Average Monthly Income Job 30.7% $1,020 SSI/Disability .18.9% $654 • • "No Income" Reported . 1.8:9% $0 • Social Security 1L6% $685 (4.2% of the 17.6% also receive pension.benefits averaging .$510 rnn.nthly)' SonomaWorks. 7.6% . .$478 Unemployment 3.4% $326 . General Assistance 1.2% . . . $398 Other 1.7% $274 Where Do They Work? 1999 Poverty_. Guidelines • Recipients who are working have a wide range of occu • pations from Retail.Trade (18%) and Service Industry Size of Income Family(18%) to Medical (15%);•General Office(13.90), and Food 3 Guideline - Service (8%). For unemployed recipients, the two most 2 $11,(160 common occupations are Construction (26%) and Service ,- a Ihdustryjobs (28%). 3,,; X13,880 $16,700 • What Type of Housing Do They Have? • 30% of all recipient households rent.an.apartment while 15% rent a house,and another 14% live in a mobile home,:RV, Or trailer. O Of those recipient households paying rent, the average • monthly rent expense is $535. The average rent to income ratio for those paying rent is 53%. • When analyzing the total number•of individuals served 1999E Apartment.Rents - i. , T, � �' t k • S by pantries and soup kitchens/shelters, 11.7% of all inci-• 5 i t viduals receiving food assistance.are homeless: Overall average rental unit Q890/mo (Compared to $808/mo in :1998, ' For all recipient households, 51% do not have a car, an 11% increase) 46% do not have a telephone, and 33% do not have a i refrigerator. Source Survey of 7 017 Sonoma ,. County Rental Units by Realfacts • • • 3 • lip* Often Do They Go . . How often:doyou think.about where your - fdeingry? next meal is coming from? i q Aiwas % of children in recipient y • h olds "sometimes," "of- � cent or always' go to bed Oven ., hungry according to their par- sometimes ''' " ='"F>;-a° ;a '" ` '`` ents. Rarely $5"161k :ff ;„ ",. fir.x',%: . 4 43.8% of parents with chil- . " ' +,^`".",76 a't.�,'i :,e, �a'&f?<< ;r ky i_`n. dren "sometimes.," " or ..� Never "always" go without food so their children can eat." 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% • 0 For recipients without children, 29.9% go,without food "sometimes" or "often." - Food Security Definitions . `'Food Securit�r Assured access to enough food for an"active healthy life . r Food Insecurity Limited or;uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and sufficient foods Hstn;er:-:Uneasy or•painful sensation caused by lack of'food due to Iack of resources to obtain food. Food Stamps & Other Programs • Only 20.8% of recipients receive food stamps. For recipientsireceiving.food stamps, the . average amount of time they have been:.receiving them is 14 years. Food stamps last two weeks for the average recipient household. What is Their Health Status? When writhe first time you sought • • food assistance? 40 34.3% of recipient households More than 10 �r ». have no medical insurance, years • 35% of recipients responde dthat 6 to 10 years I. someone in their household is,putting 1 to 5 years Off medical,care because they can't afford it while 49% are putting off Less than 1 year dental care for the,same reason. • ; . . . . First-time recipient ; , r - 0% 10% 20% 30/ 40% 50% 4' • • Agency Survey Findings Reliance on Volunteers &. Volunteer Leadership . Fifty-one agencies responded to the survey: ' Types of food agencies "always" need - . .more of: .. 54% are managed.by a paid staff person .._._:,_ — . ,..._ .... 7 while 46% are rnanaged'by a volunteer. Canned goods . The average•age of the paid'manager'is°48 Milk and'cheese. 14. " " . years old while for the volunteer manager the average age is 64 years old. cereal • 'Fresh:fruit and sr A's, - v r m,.'W axN ,.:x: • The-average age for all volunteers in all vegetables ' of the agencies is 57 ears old. Overall, c y Meat,poultry and volunteers range'in age from youth (10_ fish years old) to 93 years old with the median or 10% zoo .. sor 409e so=o 60r range being 22 to 80'years old. - How Adequate is tlie,.FoodSupply al . Agency;Sources.of Food • Other sources Ir r Vouchersonly 2 F. it ••'p Food Drives, 5% ° ' 1 ? m r - • • s " }r v Fcotl Bank., Purchased through wholesalers t. Sr of et a . 65% - 10 ! ,irk- Jm p s.. p °*'µ f ..1,,n ,V r ,: rn t x r ' i...64W4tr r. '� , ,. d Donated irornlocal markets 91t ,ydm s 11% * y I ¢tits", 4P, 56% of agencies report that they`"usually"experience an increase in'requests'for foo&toward the end of the Month while 20% responded "sometimes." . 4. 97.6% of agencies reported that they "always" (50%) or "most of the time" (47.6%).-have enough111 food to meet the.demand. . 5 -It co mendations .. - c.This report is a beginning and notan end. The first:recomtnendation'is to raise..awareness that hunger nues to be a problem in Sonoma County: n There is no easy solution to this issue. All segments•of NVommunity must work together in order ton continually'reduce the number of people who are hungry or at risk of hunger. Innovative pilot programs should b'e:explored;to reach specific populations such as children and dis- abled individuals. However, there is much that can be accomplished using existing agencies and pro- - grams: In order to increase efforts to reach out to needy people so that-they can better utilize existing programs: • 4 Conduct food stamp outreach:to , - • encourage eligible working,fami lies and seniors to apply; 'l' 1 r 6 ® R ise awareness'of the Earned d, !". ft L Income Tax Credit which:could ?it'' � �d°"""" ' allow low-income families ,N� rf,,rrr- $`�- g "M s " ...1r ' :,-hry a, . receive funds to,help lift them'.out. "'n' r ',fir 6 a�. -'.r � `, p � �r +m. so: 1 c z , �� of poverty; �. 7 Promote direct certification which ,� t1 , . �,. �."� eases the process for children to � rr,, rt s receive free school lunch and ,"`w �';�`�',i '`?. t `,� _�" '- g' breakfast; _ ax • Expand A Child's Portion.and the yr4y k z, ,44,1119174.2;344±4;;N,. .,41,,,F � ;i' {' F Summer Food Program in order to 51, _ y r�;h.t-.r�, h, .�� ,"f r reach more at-risk-children throughout the county. • Make adjustments in current programs,to take intoaccountthe high cost of living in Sonoma County. Higher income guidelines.for programs such as food stamps and the Emergency Food Assistance Program, and higher grant levels for programs such as SSI would allow low-income ' families and individuals to access..the help'that they need. Explore further the leadership'issue affecting some of the'volunteerr-run community agencies. This will require the expertise and resources of agencies experienced in this,area and the Food Bank . should take the-initiative. Finally, iris clear that.the above recommendations would help alleviate hunger but would not end hunger in our community. In order to end hunger in Sonoma County and in America, our society w ld have to make ending hunger a high pnonty. Only with this type of national effort and commit- �can we muster enough creativity, resources, and will%to ensure that no one goes hungry. • Full twenty-page report available upon request or at,www:iefb.org- - 6 • CITY OF PE'rALUNIA, •CALIFORNIA /9Ke.litle MEMORANDUM 0# 4/ 4',& 4C>, 's 4//, City`Attorney Office, 11 Englisnfreer,Petaluma, C4 94952 (707) 778-4362 Far(707) 778-4420 attorrsey@ccenalwitmee.ms 'Cot - v DATE: January 5, 2001 TO: Betsi Lewitter FROM: Richard R. Rudnansky Clare M. C-ibson0A SUBJECT: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit PRIVILEGED ANT) CONFIDENTIAL This responds to your 12/14/00 memorandum regarding the Salvation Army's intention to go to the Planning CommissmirmlateIanuary with respect to a use permit for building a new •. chapel, a child care center, and st-sociaL services building (for counseling and food distribution) on the site of a former church in the R-1-6500Zoning District You have asked us to advise as to the applicability of S.2869, otherwiseknowp as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA or the"Act,"Publictaw106-274), a copy of which is attached hereto. The RLUIPA, which was signed into law by President Clinton on September 22, 2000, provides in pertinmit parr. No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial butderviincthe religious exercise of a,person, including a religious assembly or institution, unless the government demonstrates that imposition of the burden on that person, assembly, or institution-- (A)is in furtherance of a cornpellinggoverrunerital interest; and (B) is the least restrictive Means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. (Public Law 106=274, §2(a)(I).) The Act fin-ther provides that this rule is appliCable in any case in which "the substantial burden is imposed in the implementation of a land use regulation or system of land use regulations, under which a government makes, or has in place fotrnal or informal procedures or practices that permit the-government to make, individualized assessments of the proposed uses for the property • TrAcelliit--4)7— Memo to: Betsi Lewitter Re: Salvation Army Conditional Use-Permit January 4, 2001 Page 2 • • involved." (PL 106-274 §2(a)(2)(C).) Clearly, the general rule of the RLUIPA will come into play in these circumstances as this involves`implementation.of a land use regulation and an assessment of the proposed.uses for the propertyinvolved. The next inquiry is whether rejection or curtailment,of any of the proposed;uses would constitute an impermissible"substantial burden"on "religious exercise." The,phrase"religious exercise"is defined in the Act to encompass" any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief." PL 106-274, §8(7)(A).) In addition, the"use, building, or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise shall be considered to be'religious exercise for the person on entity that uses or intends to use the,property for that purpose." PL 106-274,.§8, 7(B).) It is clear that`the Salvation,Army is a religious assembly or institution subject to the Act. See, a g., www.salvation artty.org. Its plans to build a new chapel, a child care center and a social services building would constitute a religious exercise under the terms of the RLUIPA. The next stage of inquiry then is whether any restriction or limitation on these plans would. constitute a"substantial burden." Since the.phrase"substantial burden" has not yet been defined by the courts in this context, the door is open for the Salvation Army to„argue that;any.limitation on restriction their plans constitutes a"substantial burden."Your memorandum;states that the proJect site for the•Salvation Army's proposal;is on the site of a former church in-Mead-6,500 Zoning District In Article`6 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance concerning he R- • Section 6-500!established height regulations, g 1 Disirinci gh . gulzaons, with a maximum of25•feet in height for aprincipaI building. If the Salvation Army intends to submit.plans which exceed the height regulation this Zoning District, unless the City exempts the Salvation Ainiy from that restriction,,it is likely that the Salvation Army could rely on the RLUIPA to allege that'this restriction constitutes a substantial burden on its religious exercise. If the Salvation Army claims that theCity is,imposing a;substtentialburden omits religious exercise by the implementation of its Zoning Ordinance, the burden will shift to the Cityato establish that the imposition of the burden, i:e., the restriction(s) is in furtherance of a compelling governnnentalinterest. The ph'r'ase"compelling governmental interest' is undefined in the Act, but in the context of constitutional law generally, is a high standard which can difficult-to establish. By comparison, a "legitimate state;interest” encompasses a broad range of governmentahacts. The Zoning Ordinance at Section 1-200, recites that it is "adoptedto,protect and promote the,public health, safety, morals, peace, comfort; convenience, prosperity and general welfare," etc. Whether or not the recitals of purpose contained in the.Zoning Ordinance sufficient to establish.a compelling governmental interest with'respect to the RLUIPA is 'Section 6-400 establishesconditionnal uses in the R-1 District including 6-401;;for public • and quasi-public buildingssand uses of an educational, religious, cultural, or public service:nature: • Memo to Betsi'Lewitter Re. Salvation Arrny Conditional UsePermit January 4, 2001 • Page 3 simply unknown at this stage. Finally, with respect tote requirement that a contested restriction or limitation be"the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest,"it is not possible to address that element of the analysis in the absence of any specific facts, e:g., facts pertaining to the Salvation,Army's specific plans and specific restrictions imposed,on those plans. It is difficult to predict whether:and how the RLUIPA will be invoked with respect to the Salvation Army's application for a conditional use permit., Two points are dear, however. 'First, on its face, the RLUIPA appears to grant a virtual carte blanche to religious organizations to use real property without regard to local government land use restrictions and procedures, unless the local agency:demonstrates that any such regulations do not impose a,substantial burden on religious exercise, or can show that the regulation is in furtherance of a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering than interest. Second, it is certain the constitutionalityof the RLUIPA will be challenged in the courts across the nation, and will likely ultimately be decided in the U.S. Supreme Court. Therefore, should the Planning Commission make any determinations which are adverse to or restrict the Salvation Army's proposal, it will be important to carefully document (1) that the • regulation:or determination does not impose a substantial burden,on religious exercise, (2) that a compelling govemmental interest'is served by the regulation or determination, and(3)the lack of less restrictive means of furthering such compelling:interest. • CMGflh Enclosure cc: Fred Stouder THIS DOCUMENT AND THE CONTENTS HEREIN ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED BY THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES. THIS DOCUMENT OR THE CONTENTS HEREIN SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED, LIWPDleuylr TgTALUMA1MiscSMemas4Salvation Army +rs-Lewitter0l,wpd Petaluma Ind.,-x SR-01 #2.. • PUBLIC LAW'106-274 SEPT;22, 2000 , 114 STAT, 80a • • Public La* 106-274 106th Congress An Act To protect religious L3erty,-end;Cm at&t purpbsan. Sept.22,2000. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of (s>2869) the United States of Arnerica inCangress assembled, . Religious Land- SECTION I'.SHORT TITLE. Use aid Instrtutionsliied This Act may beuited as thrfteligious Land Use and Institu- 2eo , Per Ad of 9. tionalizedPersons Act of 2000". 42 use z000tt SEC 2.PROTECTION OF LAND USE AS.auldulOUS` EGSSE note. C: (a).StimTANT1AL;BURDENS. - - 4a,dSC aa00ec. • (1).GENE*A -RULE,—No government shall impose.or imple- ment a•land-use,regilation in a Manner that imposes a substan- tial burden on the religious exercise of a person, including a religious,assembly:or institution;unless the government dem- onstratue that imposition of the burdea on that person, assembly,or:institution— • • (A) is in furtherance of a 'compelling governmental interest;and (B) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest:. • (2)Score oa APPLiCAnoN—'Phis subsection applies in any case in which— (A) the substantial burden is imposed in;a program or activity that receives-Federal financial asaistance, even if the burden resulta'from.a,rnle of general applicability; (B) the substantial burden affects, or removal of that substantial burden would affect, commerce with foreign nations, among the severed States, or with Indian,tribes, even;if'the burden results'&em.a rule of general'applica- bility;or (C) the substantial burden is imposed in the implementation of a land use regulation or system of land use regulations, under which a government makes„or has in place formal or informal procedures,or practices that permit the government to make, individualiied' assess- ments of the proposed uses for the property involved. t)'DIBCAITAINATTON AND'EXCLUSION.— (1) EQUAL TERais;-No government shall impose or imple- ment atland.use regulation in a manner that-treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreli- gious assembly or institution: (2) NONDLSCRLIINAT/ON.—NO government,shall impose or implement a land use regulation'that discriminates against • • 114:STAT, 804 PUBLIC:LAW'10&-274--SETT, 22, 2000 any assembly or institution on the basis of religion or religious denomination, (3);ERCLUSiom5 AND,Limn-5.—No government shall impose or ithitlement a land use regulation that (A.)totally,excludea religious assemblies from.a jurisdic. tion;"or , (B) unreasonably limits religious assemblies, institu- tions, or structures within jurisdiction. • moocc SEC.3.P801EC'd'ION-0F 8fiddGdCUB F.$£IiCd9giiOF,CNS17:^U7lptyer�EaD 2000cc-1' pg$GpNB: (a) GENERAL RUL .—No govemment;ahall tmyoae.a substantial burden,on the religioua exercise of a.person residing in or confined to an institution, as defined" in section 2 of the Civil Righta of • Institutionahied Persons Act (42 U S C.•1997), even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability;?Unless the government demonstrates that tmposiiioa of the burden on that porson- (1)•.is in fi rtherance of a compelling,governinental interest; and (2)(is the least restrictive means of furthering thatcompel- ling governmental interest. (b) Seen OF APPLICATION.—This;section applies in any case in which— (1) the substantial burden is imposed; in a Program or activity'that receives Federal financial assistance;or (2) the aubstantial burden affects, for removal of that substantial burdemwould affect,commerce'With foreign nations, • among the several States,or with Indian:tribes., 42'USC SEC.4.JUDtCLAL ICEI:IEF. soaace_z •(a) CAUSE OF AcTIow.--A person may assert a violation of this Act,as'a claim or defense iri..a judicial proceeding and obtain appropriateireliei against-a government.Standing.to assert a claim or defense under this section ;shall be 'governed, by the general rules of standing under article III of the Constitution: evidence Etq Sir oF,PERSUA5toN.—If a plaintiff;produces prima.facie Pport.aclaim alleg ng a violation of the?Free Exercise Clause or a violatlonof section 2, the:gover`nment shall bear the burden of persuasion Cr', any element of the claim, ;except that the plaintiff shall bear the burden of—persuasion on whether the law (including a regulation) or overnment practice that is chal- lenged by 'the'claim substantial-burdens the Plaintiff's exercise of religion. (c) •' FA.rra ANn Ca&nrr:—Adjudication of a claim of a notation of sectioii 2 in a non-Federal forum shall not be..entitled to full faith and credit in a Federal court •unless the claimant had a full and fair adjudication of`tliattlaim in the non-Federal forum. (d) Art'ORNEy5. &E .—Section 722(b).of:the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1088(b))ie amended- (1)`by inserting the Religious Land Use and,Inetitutional- ized Persons Act of 2400,"after"Religious":Freedom Reiteration Act°C19937";and (2)'bystriking-the comma that-follows a edmma: (e) PEISONE s.—Not]vng in this Act shall be construed Co amend or repeal .he Prison Litigation Reform Act of-1995 (including p!OVisions-of law amended by that Act). S . „. PUBLIC LAW 106-294—SEPT. 114 STAT,22, 2000 • _: 806' U) Aurxoiilrr OF UNITED STATES To ENFORCE;TRES ACT.—: The United°States maybang'an action for in,unetive orrdeclaratory relief to enforce compliance withthis.Ac.Not,-iing in°this subsection shall be airistrued'to deny, impair, or otherwise affect any right _ or authority of the Attorney General, the:,United States; or any agency officer, or employee of the United'State ffi s, a n any law other than this "subsection, to institute of intervene in any.proceading. CO' Ludrra ION.-If the only jinisdictional basis for applying a provision of this Act is a claim that a substant al burden by a ocerninent on religious exercise affects; or that removal of that substantial burden would affect COMmerce with foreign nations, among the several States, or with Indian tribes, the provision shall notapplyifthe government demonstrates that all Substantial burdens:on,'or thearemoval of all substahtialburdens from, similar religious exercise throughout the, Nation would not lead in the aggregate to(a,aubstantial effect on commerce with foreign nations, among the several States,or with Indian tribes, SEC.t RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. (a) RELIGIOUS•BELIEF tJNAFFEcrw —Nothing in this.Act shall i2L$C be construed to authorize any 2o0oc��' belief. y T v`ernnient to birder any religious (b) REL1Grova:EXERCISE NOT REGULATED.-Nothing in this Act ¢hail create any basis for restnctmg.orburdening religious-ous- exercise or for claims against'a religious organization including any reli- giously affiliated school or university; not acting under color'of law. • (C) •CLAPrIS TO FUNDING IJNAFFE(,1k.D ,Nothing in this Act shall Create or preclude a right of any religious organization to • receive funding`or other assistance from a government„or of any person to receive government funding for religious-activity, but this.Act may require a government'to incur expenses in its own operations to avoid imposing a substantial 'biirden-on religious. exercise./�,�_�.,� (d) 6.1-Ant Aurnoarnn To •L osz CONDITIONS ON'FUNDNG UNAFt eci ED—Nothing inithis Act shall— (1) authorize a'government to regulate or affect„directly or indirectly, the activities or, policies of a person.other'than a as -a condition of receiving funding,[or other assistance;or (2) restrict,.any authority that may.c,nat under other law to so regulate or a£rect,except as provided,n this-Act, (e) GOVERNMENTAL,DISCRERON IN ALLEVIATENNG BURDENS ON RELIGIOUS ExnRCLSE, A government` may afield. the preemptive force of any provision Of this;Act bychanging.the policy or'practiee that results in •a substantial burden on religious exercise. by retaining the policy or practice and ex_empting the substantially burdened religious exercise,by providing exem om ptions fr ,the'policy or practice for appphications that substantially burden,religioua exer- Cse, or,by any other means that eliminates the substantial burden. (f) En cr DN0ftit* raw With;resp'ect to a dale brought under this Act, proof that Si substantial burden on a erson's relf- gious exercise affects, or ranlova' of thatlburden would affect,,com- mercc with foreign nations, ,among`the 'several States, or with Indian tribes,`shall not establish any inference or presumption • • • 114`STAT,t806 PUBLIC LAW 106-27,4--SEPT, 22, 2000 that ,Congress 'intends that any religious exercise is, or is not, subject`to any law other than this Act. (g)"BROan Cosisq- urii0N.-This Act,shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted`by,the terms of this`Act and the Constitution. (h) No ,PilkEMartoN OR REPEAL.—Nothihg in this Act shall be construed to preempt State law, or repeal. Federal law, that is aq nallyyae protective of religious eecceMile as or more protective of religious exercise than, this Act (O'SEE rt If any provision of this Act,or of an amend- ment.made by this Act, or any application of such" provision to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional; the remainder, of this-Act, the amendments wade; by this-Act, and the application of,the provision to any other person or circumstance shall-notbe affected. 42 USC SEC.8.ESTARLISEthexr CLAUSE UNAFFECTED- 2000cc-i. Nothing •in this Act shall be construed to •affect, interpret, or in any 'way add ess that portion of the first" amendment to —the Constitution prohibiting laws respecting an establishment of religion"(referred:to in thia)section as the"-Establishment Clause'). Grantingtgovernment'funding, benefits, or exemptions„to the extent permissiblle ainder the Eatabllshment Clause, shall not constitute a violation of".this Act; In this section, the term "granting", used with respect ito government funding, benefits, or exemptions, does not include the denial of government funding, benefits, or exemp• tions. SEC. 7..AMENT)MENTS'TO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT. (a) DEysr1TIO&S.->Section 5 of the Religious;Freedom Restora- tion Act of 1993:,(42 U.S.C.2000bb-2)is amended- .(1)1in:parapraph (1), by stniting "a State, or a subdivision of a State"and inserting"or of a covered entity".; (2)in paragrgraph (2), by striking"tern" and all that follows through "includes and inserting "term 'covered entity'means"; (3) in paragraph (4), by striking all after "means" and inserting "religious exercise; as defined"in;section S of the Religions Land Use:and(Inatituhonalized PerlonaAct of 2000:". (b) CoNToRMCeQ ''Dt+ Yr.-Section 6(a) of the Religious Freedom Restoration. Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb-3(a)) is amended by striking"and State". 42 L'SC SEC.8.DEFENITIONR 2000ct-b. In this Act: (I) CLAmuin--The term "claimant" means a person raising claim-or defense urider this Act.. (2)'. DEldoxsz ALES.-The term "demonstrates" means meets the burdens of going'forward with the evidence and of persuasion. (3) FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE.--The terra "Free Exercise Clause" Paeans that portion of the first amendment to the Constitution that prescibes'lawe prohibiting the free exercise of religion. (4)GOVERN:KE ,-r.—The tern$government"- CA)means- , (i) a State, county, municipality, or'other govern- . mental entity created. under the authority of a State; • PUBLIC LAW 106274--SEPT, 22, 2000 114STAT. 807 • Cu )i any branch, department, .agency; instrumen- tality, or official of an entity listed in clause'(i); and (iii) any other person acting under color of State law;'and • (B) for the purposes of sections 4(b)..and.5, includes ithe h • United dty or plHcial)branch, department, agency,•other person acting under color,of Federal law. and any (5)Lam USE'EEGIJI„ATIOS.—The ternigland means a zoning or landmarkin law, or !the napplicat ono of such a law, that limits or restricts a.claiman or de eiopf meat of land (including a stricture affxed;to land), if the claimant has an ownership leasehold, easement, servitude, or other property interest in the regulated land•or a contract or option to acgtura such an interest, (6)PROGRAM OR ACrIYrry:-The;term "program or activity" means all of the operations of an" entity as described in para- graph (1) cc(2) of section 606 Of the Civil Plights An of 1964 (42 U.S.C-.J 2000d-4a).. (7)RELIGIOUS EISER.CISE.- (A) IN G ERAL, The term 'religious exercise" includes any,exercise of religion, whether or:not compelled by, or central to a systeui,of religious belief. BY RULE,—The use, building, or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise shall be considered to be,religious exorcise of the person or entity that uses or intends to 1115i-the property for purpose. Approved September 22, 2000. • • • LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.2862; CONGRESSIONAI;IRECORD,+Yal..146(9000); passed anwEEII OMPILATION OF PES g IA:.DOCW SENTS„YaL 36(2000 YSept,22,Precdonhal statement Q • • • • Petaluma Community Development Department Planning Division RECEIVED 11 English Street. Petaluma, CA 94952 JAN 2 �� ?rui 707/778-4301 .,.A;pi' dtl it, . ,t li;4,A, III:'iiii;MEN- Initial Study of Environmental, Significance . ® IntrOdUCtiOn: This Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq) and the.CEQ:A Guidelines: Additional information incorporated by reference herein includes: the project application, environmental information questionnaire, environmental review data sheet, project referrals, staff report, General Plan, EIR and Technical Appendices, and other applicable planning documents (i. e., Petaluma River Access and Enhancement Plan, Petaluma River Watershed Master Drainage Plan;specific plans, etc.) on file at the City of Petaluma Planning Division. Project Name: Salvation Army Petaluma Center Conditional Use Permit File No: CUP00014 Site Address: 721 South McDowell Boulevard. APN: 007-570-028 Posting Date: January 24,2001 Comments Due: February 13, 2001 L ad Agency Contact: Betsi Lewitter; Project Planner Phone: (707) 778-4301 . licant: Wayne Miller for Salvation Army Phone: (707) 763-6813 I Bodega Avenue Petaluma, CA 94952 Property Owner: Salvation Army,A California Corporation 721 South McDowell Boulevard Petaluma, CA.94954 Project Description: The applicants are requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow operation of a variety of religious services, community assembly and social ':programs on an approximately two-acre site in the R-1-6,500 zoning district. The site is currently developed with a chuicdiarid'two single-family homes — one of which is used as a multi-purpose building. The proposal includes the remodel of the existing church building for use as administrative offices and classrooms, . construction of a new chapel,the construction of asocial services and supplies building and the construction of a new child care center.'One of the existing;homes will'be demolished; the other home will continue to be used as a dwelling unit. The Petaluma Zoning Ordinance lists'religious and public service uses and child care centers as conditional uses in the R-1-6,500 zoning district. . A new 5,951 square,foot, 150=seat,chapel,and atrium will be used.for.Sunday services and could be also used for community meetings or special functions typical of churches, such as weddings. The building will be placed at the front of the site replacing the existing parking lot along McDowell Boulevard. The,main entrance will be turned toward a central covered 'courtyard between the new Chapel and the existinr, church building to make access to the building easier from the central and rear parking areas;and to minimize sound.from.worshipers gathering outside before and after services. A 5,070 square foot social services and supplies building will be located behind the existing residential structure. The building OI p, be used for general social 'services including transitional housing program counseling and meetings, utility assistance sews, and grocery distnbution.(which includes delivery of food to the site and volunteer assembly of bags of groceries). e services will occur during regular working hours throughout.the week. Food will be distributed to needy families once a month. The building will include a large storage area for emergency supplies for disaster relief, storage of palletized food supplies for distribution to the needyand indoor parking,for the Salvation Army mobile field canteen van. • Pape 1 Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit He No. CUP00014 Page 2 Potentially Less than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant impact Impact w/Mitigation. Impact Measures A 5,1.53 square foot childcare center will be constructed at,the rear of the lot, separated from the social service building and church by a parking lot..A loop road will allow the pickirig,up and drooping off of children independently of other activities:on the site The childcare center is proposed to operate from,6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.ni, Mondays through Saturdays, with extended care from.5:00 p m. to 10:00 p.m. The center will be licensed for a.maximum of 60 children, preschool.age and younger; who will be cared for by 8 paid staff members. Between 20 to 40 children will be cared:for during the evening shift, with peak attendance hours between TOO and'9:00 p.m. Two outside play areas are also provided. An area northeast of the childcare center will be reserved for toddlers; an area southeast;of the building will be provided for preschool children.,Outside playtime would be staggered to reduce._tne number of children outside at one time Children would not be outside before 10:00 a.m. or after 6:00 p.m. during PacificiStandard Time or after 8:00 p:m. during Pacific Daylight Savings Time. • The existing church building will be•remodeled and used for Sunday.school and occasional meetings. During the school year, the Sunday school classrooms and Fellowship room will be used for an after school program for approximately'15-20 school- age children.This program will end at 6:00p.m. and will have 3-5 adults to supervise and assist with the children's homework. The existing'southern driveway, which currently provides access to the single-family dwelling, is proposed to be widened to 24 feet and to be used for ingress and egress from the site. The northern 12-foot wide driveway has been designed for egresslonly. A total of 50 off-street parking spaces are proposed to serve the development. Per Section 205300 of the Petaluma,Zoning Ordinance, parking for churches is based onthe.number of seats in the chapel; in this case,38 parking spaces ate required for a 150-seat chapel. The Sunday school classes proposed for the church'structure are incidental to the chapel use and do not require additional parking spaces. An additional 10 off-street parking spaces are required for the social service office uses; 5 spaces are required for the storage area 3 spaces (I of which must be covered) are required for the-residential use and 8 spaces are required for the childcare center (based on the number of full-time employees). Therefore, a total of 6.t off-street parking spaces would be required for the proposed development. However,.Section 20-603 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance allows the Planning Director to determine, prior to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit, that a 25 percent reduction in th� required off-street parking is allowable if the typical•use of the off-street parking facility would be staggered to such an extent . that the reduced number of spaces would be adequate to serve all uses sharing the facility. It has been determined that this • project qualifies for the 25 percent reduction based on the proposed Master Schedule.of Operations provided by the applicant (See Project Statement dated November 2, 2000). With the 25 percent reduction, a total of 48 off-street parking space would be required; 50 are provided. A total of 23,059 square feet of building floor area, 50 parking spaces,and associated landscape will occur on the site after all construction is completed. Environmental Setting: The approximately 2-acre site is basically flat Single-family homes are located to the northwest, behind and across McDowell Boulevard from the site Another church also exists behind the subject site To the east is a senior citizen, low-income apartment project The site is currently developed with a-church and two single-family residences,one of which is used as a multi-purpose building for the church. The rest of the°site is undeveloped and covered in native grasses. McDowell Boulevard,is classified as an arterial roadway, with a Level of Service (LOS) A in the:Petaluma General Plan. All public utilities currently serve the site or are available. Responsible/Trustee Agencies: (Discuss other permits, financing or participation required): • City of Petaluma Planning Commission and Site Plan and Architectural.Review Committee. The proposal conforms to the requirefnents, intent, goals and policies of the General Plan. Specifically, the project further implements'theiollowing General Plan goals, policies and objectives: Chapter 3,.Objective(i). Upgrade the quality of public residential commercial and industrial development throughout the city.. Chapter 3, Objective(o). Encourage adaptive re-use:of vacant or underutilized structures. Chapter 7, &Oat 6 Acdress the childcare needs of Petaluma's working parents. Chapter 7, Objective iu). Encourage "all-day" care centers,and private preschools to provide facilities for year-around care. Chapter 9, Objective(d), Provide'housing opportunities for persons'of'all economic levels. Chapter 9,Objective(g). Improve the conditions of the city's existing housing. • • Page 2 Project Name: Salvation.Army Conditiona!Use Permit File No. CUP00014 Page.3 Potentially _Less:than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact •. Inipact w/Miugation Impact Measures In addition, the project, which includes transitional housing and job counseling and childcare, implements the following priorities of Petaluma's Consolidated.Plan I12000-2005. Priority 2: Provision of rental units for very-low and low-income residents, particularly those units with supportive services. Priority 4: Promotion of housing choices and opportunities. Priority 5: Provision of programs, projects,..or facilities which enhance the community's childcare capacity for low-income households, with particular focus on welfare-to-work. Priority 6: Provision of programs, projects, orfacilities which provide job-related;assistance to low-income persons. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:. The environmental,factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated'by"the checklist on the following pages.. 1. Land Use&Planning X 7. Noise 13. Utilities Infrastructure 2. Population, Employment&Housing X 8. Visual Quality&Aesthetics _ 14. Mineral Resources 3. Geology& Soils 9. Hazards&Hazardous Materials 15. Cultural Resources X 4. Air X 10. Transportation/Traffic 16. Agricultural Resources Hydrology&Water Quality 11. Public Services 17. Mandatory Findings of Significance 6. Biological Resources 12. Recreation • • • • • • • p,',0 .. Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP000014 Page 4 M Determination • I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the envirorunent and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the'environment there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or,agreed to by the project X proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards',;and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be-addressed. I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects a)-have been analyzed adequately in-an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or. NEGATIVE DECLARATION including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project nothing further is required. A Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration will be prepared, distributed and posted for theipublictcomment perio� of January 23,2001 through February 43, 2001. Prepared by: 'Betsi Lewitter Name Contract Planner Title Signature Date • Page 4 'Project.Name. Salvation.Arrny,Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP-00020,14 Pace 5 'Evaluation of E_r cironmental Impacts 1) A brief explanation is :required for all answers: except "No impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question: A No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does.not.apply-to,projects like the one involved (e.g.. the project:falls outside:a.faulf rupture zone). A no impact answer should`be explained where it is based in project-specific factors as well as general standards, i.e., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based oh a project-specific screening analysis. 2) All answers must take account of the whole..action involved, including: off-site as well as on-site cumulative, project- level indirect, direct, construction, and operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact:may: occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant less than ,significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has,reduced'an effectrfrom "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level(mitigation measures from-Section XVII,"Earlier Analyses'maybe cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, purstiaht;to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been • adequately'analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration pursuant to Section. 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following • a) Earlier Analysis Used'. Identify'and-state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the.above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate,into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page:or pages where the statement,is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) . The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance`criteria'or threshold;if any, used to evaluate each question; and • b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. • Page 5. Project Name: Salvotion Army Conditional Use Permit He No. CUP00014 • Page 6 • _ - Potential Less Than Less Than No: Significant Significant •Significant Impact ., • Impact w/Mitigation ::Impact . - Incorporated_ . . Environmental Analysis ; 1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project a. Physically divide an established community? X b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project • (including, but not.limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal';program,or zoning-ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental,effect? c. Conflict with any,applicable habitat,conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Discussion: arc. The site contains an existing church; the proposed expansion of uses to include:public services and day care is conditionally permitted by the-Petaluma Zoning Ordinance Section 6-401 and 6-409. Mitigation MeasuresMonitorine::None required. 2. Population, Employment and Housing. Would the project: • a. Induce substantial population growth-th an area,either X directly(for example,by proposing new homes and • businesses)or indirectly(for example,-through extension of roads-or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of.people necessitating the X constructionof replacement housing-elsewhere? • Discussion: a-c: The existing single-family home on the site will continue to.be used as a dwelling. The proposal includes the addition of a single-car garage and concrete driveway on which two additional-cats could be parked, which will bring the existing dwelling into compliance with the City's parking requirements. Mitigation Measures!Monitoring: None required. . - • 3. Geology and Soils. Would the project: a. Expose people or,structures'to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death • involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as X delineated on the most recent Alauist-Priolo • 1111 Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the , State.Geologist for the area or based on other • Page,6 • Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use.Permit File No CUP00014 Page 7 • „ Potential i Less Than Less Than No Significant .Significant Significant Impact Impact w/Mitigation Impact Incorporated substantial evidence of a known-fault?Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic groundshaking? X iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including X liquefaction? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c. Be,located on a geologic uniror soil that is unstable,or X that would become unstable as a'resultin on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be-located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B x of the Uniform Building Code (1994),creating. substantial risks to life or property? e. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic X • substructures? f. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering X of the soil? . • g. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X h. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique X geologic or physical features? i. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on X or off site? j. Changes in.deposition or'erosiortof beach sands,or - X changes in siltation, deposition;or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream_or the bed'of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? k. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such X as earthquakes;;landslides,mudslides,ground failure or similar hazards? Discussion: a-k: The project is an in-fill,development. The project will not result in unstable earth or geologic conditions. The soil will be compacted prior to project construction. Additional buildings and associated paved parking and circulation areas will cover the soil. The project will not result'in the destruction or covering of anv unique geologic features or expose people to any geologic hazards not typically associated with this region. The projectsite,is relatively flat with no significant land features or characteristics. The minor grading required-to permit development of the project has the potential to cause slight water erosion if construction is carried out during'the rainy season (Octoberl5 through April i5). The grading also has the potential to cause minor d erosion if the soil conditions are dry. i e application of the requirements contained in the City of Petaluma Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance reduce any potentially significant environmental impacts resulting from erosion and/or runoff to;a level of less than significant. Pnop'7 • • Project Name:. Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP0001 4 Page 8 a Potential - Less Than Less Than No • Significant -Significant Significant Impact, Impact w/Mitigation.' Impact. Incorporated Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring for Potential:lnipacts`Related to Construction:. 1. All earthwork, grading, trenching, back-filling and compaction operation shall'be conducted in accordance with the City'sGrading and'Erosion_Control Ordinance (Title 7, Chapter 17.11, of the Municipal Code • 2. All public and/or private improvements shall be subject to inspection by City staff for compliance with the approved Improvement Plans,prior to City acceptance. 3. The applicant shall submit an Erosion and-Sediment Control Plan prepared by a registered;professional engineer an as integral part of the grading,plan. The Erosion'and'Sediment Control Plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Planning Director, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, The Plan shall include temporary erosion control measures'to be used,during grading operations-at the site to prevent discharge of sediment and:contaminants into the drainage system. The Erosion and Sediment,Control Plan shall include the following measures as applicable. a. Material and equipment for implementation of erosion control measures shall be on —site by October 1". All grading activity shall be completed by October 15th prior to the onset of the rainy season, with all disturbed areas stabilized, and, if applicable, revegetated by October3l". Upon approval'by the Petaluma City Engineer, extensions for short-term grading may be allowed. Special erosion control measures may be required by the City Engineer in conjunction with any specially permitted rainy season grading. 4. All construction activities shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,regulations for seismic safety (i.e., reinforcing peruneter'and/or load,bearing walls,bracing parapets,'etc.). 4. Air. Where available, the'significance of criteria established by the applicable air quality management or''air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the .roject: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the • X applicable air quality plan? b. Violate-any air quality standard or contribute X substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? • c. Result in cumulatively considerable net increase of any • x criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable,federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions-which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Exposesensitive receptors to substahtial•pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? Discussion: a-e: Temporary short-term increases in exhaust emissions and dust would result from the use of construction equipment.This will not be of a level that would result in::a significant impact to-ambient air quality. • Mitigation Measures-and Monitoring for Potential`Impacts Related to Construction: The applicant shall incorporate the following Best Management Practices into the construction and improvement plans and clear! indicate these provisions in the specifications The construction contractor shall incorporate these measures into the require erosion and sediment plan to limit dust and exhaust emissions during construction. 1. Grading and construction equipment operated during construction activities shall be properly muffled and maintained to • minimize emissions. Equipment shall be turned off when not in use. • Page 8 • .Rroleat'Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP00014 Page 9 j Potential Less Than Less Than No _ Significant Significant Significant Impact .Impact 'iv/Mitigation 'Impact Incorporated 2. Exposed soils shall be watered periodically during construction, a minimum of twice daily. The frequency of watering . shall be increased if wind speeds exceed I5 mph. Only purchased City water or reclaimed water shall be used for this _ purpose. Watering shall also occur on weekends and holidays when work is not in progress. 3. Construction sites involving earthwork shall provide for a gravel pad area consisting of an impermeable liner and drain rock at the construction entrance to clean mud and debris from construction vehicles prior to entering the public roadways. Street surfaces in the vicinity of the project shall be routinely-swept and cleaned of mud and dust carried onto the street by construction vehicles. • • 4. During excavation activities, haul trucks used to transport soil shall utilize.tarps or other similar covering devices to reduce dust emissions. • 5. Applicant shall designate a person with authority to require increased watering to monitor the dust and erosion control program. The name and phone number shall-be,provided to the City of Petaluma prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Hydrology and Water Quality: Would;theproject: a. Violate any water quality standards.or waste discharge X requirements? • • b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater,recharge such that there would be a net deficit in acuifervolume or a lowering of • the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been.granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern-ofthesite X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would.exceed X the capacity-of existing;or planned stormwater drainage systems or providesubstantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. •Otherwise.substantially degrade water quality? X g Place housing within a 100=year flood hazard area as X • mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a:100-year flood.ha7Prd area structures X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X Page 9 Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP00014 Paae 10 Potential Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant •Impact • Impact w/Mitigation. Impact Incorporated injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudfiow? X ' Discussion: a-j:.The project is not located within a floodway or floodplain. The project would not result in alteration to the course of floodwaters, affect ground water, affect surface waters, reduce the public water supply or expose:people to water-related hazards. It is expected that construction-of the additional buildings and paved parking and circulation on site will create•a change in the absorption rate, drainage pattern and rate and amount of surface water runoff;however;the existing storm'drain;facilities•are adequate to serve the new development The mitigations suggested below address any potential impacts. Mitigation.Measures and Monitoring'for Potential'Impacts:Related to:Construction: l.— This development shall be subject to the City's,"storm drainage impact fees to cover the incremental impact/increase it will have on the City's storm drainage system. 2. All grading activity shall be completed prior to the onset:of the rainy season. All new drainage facilities shall be in place and in operation at that .time. Grading, and excavation activities shall not be permitted during the rainy season. Extensions for grading and drainage facilities work may be allowed in consultation with the Petaluma City Engineer, based on the sensitivity of the specific project area to erosion, sedimentation, and the effectiveness of temporary (rainy season) erosion measures to be implemented by the applicant. 3. Plans submitted at time of application for building permit shall include provisions for storm water runoff managemenal The submittal.shall reflect installation of permanent signs at drop inlets, if any to the public storm drain system, whit , prohibit the deposit of hazardous materials into the system. 4 All construction activities shall,be performed in a manner that minimizes the sediment and/or pollutants entering directly or indirectly into the storm drain system or ground water. The applicant shall incorporate:the following,provisions into the construction' plans and specifications, to be verified by the Planning Department; prior to issuance of grading or building permits: • a) The applicant shall designate on the-improvement plans construction staging areas and areas for the storage of any hazardous-materials (i.e., motor oil; fuels, paints, etc) to be used during construction. All construction _ staging areas shall be located away from any stream and adjacent drainage areas to prevent runoff from construction areas from entering into the drainage system.Areas designated for storage of.hazardous materials shall include proper containment features to prevent:contamination from entering:drainage areas in the event of a spill or leak: b)N •debris, soil,sand, cement, concrete, or washings thereof, or other construction related materials or wastes, soil or petroleum products or other:organic or earthen-material shall be allowed to enter any drainage system. All discarded material including washings and any accidental spills shall be removed and disposed of at an approved disposal site The applicant shall designate appropriate disposal methods and/or facilities on the construction plans or in the specifications. . 5. The applicant shall submit a detailed grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the City Engineer and Planning Department prior to approval of any improvement,plans or the issuance of a grading permit. Project grading and all site drainage improvements shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the City of Petaluma Engineering Department's "Standard Specifications," and with the Sonoma County Water Agency's "Flood Control Design Criteria-' if applicable Drainage plans shall include supporting calculations of storm drain and culvert size usin acceptable engineering methods. No-lot-to-lot drainage shall be permitted. Surface runoff shall be addressed within eac lot and then conveyed to an appropriate storm drain system. All hydrologic,hydraulic,and storm,drain system design, if applicable, shall be subject to review and approval of the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA); and the City Engineer. Page 10 Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional'Use Permit File No. CUP00014 Page 11 • Potential Less Than Less Than No _ Signif cant - Significant Significant Impact Impact - w/Mitigation Impact Incorporated 6. Biological Resources. Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans,policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X or other sensitive natural corirntinity,identified in local or regional plans,policies;regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effecton federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(including,but not limited to, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through d rect removal,filling,hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X • resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? • e. Conflict with any local policiesor ordinances protecting X biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. f. Conflict with the provisions ofanadopted Habitat X Conservation Plan,Natural Comniunity'Conservation Plan or other approved local,regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion: a-f: The site is located within an urbanized and largely developed area.The on-site landscape and grasses are a mix • of native and non-native; no on-site vegetation is considered to be unique, rare;or;endangered. Additionally, there are no on-site animal species that are unique; rare or endangered Which would be harmed by the proposed additional buildings and associated improvements.There are no wetlands or riparian habitat on the site The omanental landscape to be installed as part of this project may offer increased habitat and food sources for wildlife typical ofurban areas. No trees are proposed to be removed. Therefore, no significant environmental impacts related to biological resources will be created as a result of this proposal. . Mitigation Measures/Monitoring: None required. . 7. Noise. Would the project result in: a. Exposure 6 •persons to or generation of noise,levels in X excess of standards established in the local general plan • or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Exposure of to or generation of excessive X groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? • "Page 11 Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No CUP00014 Page 12 _ Potential Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact • Impact ' w/Mitigation Impact lncorpofaied c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? - • d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 'X noiselevels in the project vicinityabove levels existing. • without the project? e. For a project located within an airport-land use plan or, X where such-a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people.residing"or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • • f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip X would theproject expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise,levels? Discussion: a-£ A temporary increase in noise is expected during construction of the project due to the use of heavy equipment. However,'this noise will be.short term and temporary. An increase in noise will result from the addition of the childcare center and other proposed uses to the site Most of the increases in,noise will be attributable to typical noises generated;from vehicles and activities associated with any church facility use With the exception of a church located on,property to the rear; residential use surround the subject site The day care facility will be placed at back of the site Noises from vehicles entering the;site to pick u or drop off children for the after-hours childcare could adversely impact the residential neighbors. However,it is unlikelythat'this impact would be dissimilar from noise impacts expected from 11 dwellings which could be constructed on the site under the present zoning. According to an Acoustical Study-performed by Ill'uigworth & Rodkin, dated October 18, 2000, 28 preschoolers playing near the bordering:residential property lines would not be expected to cause average noise levels to exceed'the City of Petaluma's performance standard limit.of 60 dBA on the residential side of the existing wood property line fences. The:acoustical consultants state that the play areas are appropriately sited with the quietest children, the toddlers, being closest to the nearest residential neighbors. Subsequent to the writing of the Acoustical Study, the plans were revised to eliminate one play area adjacent to the residences to the north to further reduce the,noise impact on the neighbors. However, based on the°+City's General Plan Noise Element Policy 27,.which states, "Require sound buffers (particularly landscape buffers, open space, or other mitigation measures between residential areas and areas producing higher noise levels, such as freeways,commercial sites, and industrial developments to achieve the sound level reduction necessary to produce noise-compatible land uses", and based on the CEQA Guidelines which establish that.a project.would have an adverse effect if it would•cause a substantial temporary-;periodic, or permanent increase:in ambient noise levels-in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; i •is recognized that the . noise from children's play could impact the:neighbors. Based on this conclusion, mitigation measures recommended by the Acoustical consultant are included to further address possible noise impacts. - • Mitigation Measures/IVlonitorin_g of Potential Noise Impacts: 1. All construction and operation activities shall comply with applicable Performance Standards in the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code. - • 2. All construction activities shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on.Saturdays. Construction shall be prohibited on Sundays and all holidays recognized by the City of Petaluma, unless a permit is first secured from the City Manager(or his/her designee) for additional hours. There will be no start. up of machines nor equipment prior to 8:00 a.m., Monday through Friday; no delivery of materials nor equipmen — prior to 7:30 a.m. nor past.5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; no servicing of equipment/past-6:4S p.m., Merida through Friday. 3. All construction equipment-powered by internal combustion equipment shall be-properly muffled'and maintained to 'minimize noise. Equipment shall be turned off when not in use. Page 12 • • Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP000,1.4 Page 13 • } \ Potential Less Than 'Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact- wThliiigation .Impact - lncorporbted. 4. Construction maintenance, storage; and staging areas for construction equipment shall avoid proximity to residential areas to the maximum extent practicable. Stationary construction equipment, such as compressors, mixers, etc., shall be placed away-from residential;areas and/or provided with acoustical shielding. Quiet construction equipment shall be used when possible. 5. The applicant shall designate a Project Manager with authority to implement the mitigation measures who will be responsible for responding to any complaints from the neighborhood, prior to issuance of a building/grading permit. The Project Manager shall determine the cause of noise complaints (e.g. starting too early, faulty muffler, etc.) and shall take prompt action to correct the problem.. _ 6. Optimize the site plan to minimize adverse effects on the adjacent neighbors..Play areas for preschoolers should be located as far away from the property'line as'feasible and the use of elevated play structures should be minimized. 7. If windows are proposed on the rear of`the building adjacent to the reidences, these windows should be kept closed during noisy indoor play periods. If complaints are received, windows•could'be fixedclosed. 8. If noise complaints due to outdoor play activity are received from neighbors once the center is in operation, a secondary solid wood or masonry block wail shall be'built either around the play°areas or parallel to the existing property line fences on the Salvation Army side-of the property line to attenuate:noise. These.walls should be built to a height which will block the line of sight from the children-in the play areas to the rear yards or outdoor use areas of the residences. • Visual Quality and Aesthetics. Would the project: •a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? - • X b. Substantially damage.scenic resources including,but not X limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character.or X quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light orglarewhich X would adversely affect dayoi=nighttime views in the area? • Discussion: a-d: Parking lot and security lighting will be typical of lighting for urban- uses. The lights could contribute cumulatively to the existing.nighttime glare.The engineering firm,of'Winzler and Kelly provided an exterior lighting design and - photometric study, dated October20, 2000, evaluating the lighting design.options-to ensure minimal light intrusion on adjacent properties while maintaining adequate'lighting at the project site. The study offered two options for lighting on the site One option was for fixtures to be mounted 12 feet abovegrade on 10-foot high-steel oraluminum square poles with a two-foot concrete base. The second option was to use;polermountedlights for the parking areas and3-foot tall bollard-type fixtures for the driveways and areas adjacent to the property line fence. Other lighting would consist of wall-mounted lights on the buildings_. The consultant proposed lighting levels with a maximum of 4-footcandle immediately under the fixtures; however, the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance states that maximum illumination,at ground level shall not be in excess of 3 footcandle. The following mitigation measures, SPARC review and the City's Performance Standards will ensure that the lighting will not have an adverse environmental impact on the heighborhbod. The site is not in an area.designated,as a scenic resource..The new buildings and .iated improvements wouldvupgade the site from its present condition and, therefore, would benefit the surrounding aborhood. • Page 13 - Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit file No. CUP00014 Page 14 1 Potential Less Than Less Than ' No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact wMitigation Impact - 'Incorporated Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring'of Potential':Light/Glare Impacts: All exterior lighting shall be directed onto the project site and access ways and shielded to prevent glare and intrusion onto adjacent residential properties. Plans submitted for project review and approval shall incorporate lighting plans, which reflect the location and design of all exterior lighting proposed. In no case shall the maximum' illumination at ground level exceed 3.footcandle. 2. Shade trees shall be incorporated along public streets and within parking areas in conformance with the City's Site Plan and Architectural Review Guidelines to reduce glare and'provide shade and screening. 3. Architectural detail,:lighting plans, landscaping plans, specifications on parking lot layout and detailed site plans shall be subject to review and,approval by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Fixtures providing security lighting shall be controlled by integral photocells, set to turn the fixture on from dusk to dawn or when the light level falls below the preset threshold. .All other fixtures shall be controlled by a universal 7-day time clock that can be programmed for time of day operation.The lights shall be set to turn off at close of business. 9. Hazard's & Hazardous Materials. Would the project: a. Create"a significant hazard to the public or the x environment through.the routine transport use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and • accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials,into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely X hazardous:`materials, substances,or waste within one- quartermile-of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located,ona site which i"s included on list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the • environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such aplan has not been adopted,within two:miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in - the project area?. • • f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, X would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working,in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically,interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to asignificant risk of loss, X injury or death involving wildland'fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where Page 14 • Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP0001`4 Page 15 • Potential Less'Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact vw/Mitigation Impact - Incorporated residences are intermixed with wildlands? Discussion: a-h: No storage of chemical or hazardous materials is anticipated with the proposed uses on the site. Except during construction where equipment may be used requiring various types of fuel, the project does not involve hazardous substances and should have no effect on an,emergency evacuation plan. Any future occupancy of,the buildings will be required to satisfy all applicable building code and City of.Petaluma^safety requirements. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Mitication Measures/Monitoring: None!required.. • I0. Transportation/Traffic.Would theproject: a. Cause an increase in traffic_which is substantial in X relation to the existing traffic and capacity of the — street system(i.e.,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips,`the Volume'to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion atintersections)?' b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively,a level of X service standard established by the county.congestion . management agency for designated roads or highways? • c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either X an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that - results insubstantial"safety risks? . d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature • X (e.g.,sharp curves'or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses (e.g.,farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X f. Result in inadequate parking•capacity? X g. Conflict with adopted policies,plans,or programs X supporting alternative transportation, i.e.,bus turnouts,. bicycle racks)? Discussion: a-g: A.church has previously been located on this site The addition of the childcare and social service functions could result in an increase in vehicle,,movements. The developer will be responsible fora fair share contribution to the City's Traffic Mitigation fee as established through City Ordinance and in the City's Special.Development Fees handout. In addition, the uses on site will not be operating simultaneously. A total of 50 parking spaces are to be provided on the site, which will be adequate for all uses considering that the church will not be holding services at the same time as the social service building or the childcare center are in operation. A Traffic Study to assess the impacts was prepared by Whitlock and Weinberger Transportation. -Inc. on December 20, 2000. The consultants found that the trip generation rate for the church occurs during the weekend, while the other uses on site have their peak trip generation during the weekday commute periods. It was noted that the McDowell Boulevard South/Caulfield Lane signalized intersection operates at LOS C during the p.m,peak hour and is expected to continue to operate at this level with development of the project.The average delay would be expected to increase by only 0.2 seconds;therefore, the o erational performance of the intersection would remain within established thresholds, and the project would have a less than ficant impact.. The project's potential impact on the capacity of the existing southbound left-mm lane at the McDowell levard South/Caulfield Lane was also evaluated. The left turn pocket is 100 feet long and can accommodate 5 vehicles. The current design queue during the,evening peak hour (the estimated number of vehicles waiting in the left-turn pocket) was calculated at 3 vehicles. The design..queue based on existing plus project condition traffic volumes would remain the same at 3 vehicles. The conclusion of the traffic engineer was that the project demand and interactions at the project access driveways would not result in a significant impact; however, due to sight distance limitations for motorists existing the southerly driveway created Page 15 Project Name' Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP0001 4 Page 16 Potential . Less Than. Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/Mitigation Impact Incorporated by the median island within the transition area for the soutloound left.-turn pocket on McDowell Boulevard South, a mitigation measure to prohibit left turn movements at the southerly driveway is included. The secondary driveway at the nor.hern end of the site has good sight distance and is expected to operation adequately. _ • Mitigation Measures and Applicable Monitoring of Potential Transportation/Circulation Impacts Related to Construction: 1. The applicant shall be;responsible for the payment of the City's Traffic Mitigation Fees. Traffic Mitigation Fees shall be calculated at the time of issuance of a building permit and shall be due and payable before final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. During non-working hours;open trenches and construction hazards within the public right-of-way shall beprdvided with signage, flashers, and barricades approved by the Street Superintendent to warn oncoming motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians of potential safety hazards. 3. All road surfaces shall be restored to pre-project conditions after completion of any project-related utility installation activities. All trench pavement restorationwithin existing asphalt streets-shall receive,a slurry seal. 4. Frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the city's Street Standards to provide for'safe access to and from the site Curb cuts, signing, and striping, if applicable, shall be incorporated into the design as required by the City's traffic Engineer. Improvement or construction plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Traffic Engineer prior to issuance-of a,grading or building permit. All street frontage improvements,shall be constructed to City standards and inspected by City Inspectorsprior to final inspections or acceptance of improvements. • 5. .Appropriate signs shall-be installed at the southerly driveway to prohibit outbound left-turn movements onto McDowell Boulevard South. 11. Public Services. a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically alteredlgovernmental facilities,need for new or physically'altered governmental facilities,the — construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of public services: Fire.protection? X Police protection? X Schools? x. Parks? y Other public facilities? X • Discussion: a: The development is proposed to occur within an urbanized area which is already serviced bya variety of public • services. Additional fire,and police service calls may occur as a result of this proposal. However, the impact upon schools and parks would be less than if the site were built out with residential units. The applicants will be required to pay the applicabl development fees that are assigned to all other proposals to address the incremental impact that the proposal presents to all public services. Therefore;no significant environmental impacts will occur as a result of this proposal. Page 16 • Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP000:14; Pace 17 . Potential less Than Less Than No ' •Significant Significant Significant Impact - Impact ;w/Mitigation Impact Incorporated ' Mitigation Measures/Monitoring: L The project shall be subject to the payment of established City Special Development Fees as applicable, including: Park and Recreation Land Improvements, Sewer and Water connection, and Traffic Mitigation as specified by City Resolution. 2. In order to ensure public safety and provide for police surveillance, all non-residential buildings and public use areas shall have security alarms and provide motion or heat sensitive security lighting to parking areas, pedestrian pathways and areas of concealment around the perimeter of each building All parking:areas and pedestrian pathways shall provide visual access to the extent practicable from public,streets and may require mirrors placed on an angle to be seen from the street or public right-of-way to provide visual access to areas of potential;concealment. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide and maintain current emergency contact information on file at the Police,Depaituent. 12. Recreation. a. Would the project increase the use of existing x neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational • facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? • b. Does the project include recreational`facilities or require • x the construction or expansion on recreational facilities • which might have an adverse physical effect on the • environment? Discussion: a-b: The property is already developed with a church, dwelling and multi-use building. The project includes indoor and outdoor play areas for the children to be served by the childcare center. The approximately 11 dwelling units which could be constructed on the site could pose a more significant impact to the City's recreational facilities. Therefore, no significant environmental impacts to recreational facilities are'anticipated as a result of this project. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring: None required 13. Utilities Infrastructure. Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the • X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or • X wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result inthe construction of new storm water X drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,'the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X project from existing entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X provider which serves or may serve the project that it • adequate capacity;to serve the project's projected demand • Page 17 Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP00014 Page 18 Potential Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/Mitigation Impact - Incorporated • in.addition to the provider's existing commitments? f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity X to accommodate the project's'solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X regulations related to solid waste? Discussion: a-f: The site-is partially developed with a church, residence and multi-use building and isserved by Pacific Gas and Electric; Pacific Bell and City water and sewer.The site-is located within an urbanized area that is largely developed.The project sponsors will be required to pay standard water and sewer hookup fees for the new structures It is not anticipated that any significant adverse environmental iinpact to utilities will occur. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring: — 1. The project sponsor shall be[required to pay for additional water and sewer connections as established in the City's Special Development Fee handout. 14. Mineral Resources. Would the project: a. Result in the_loss or availability of a known mineral X resource that would be or value to the region and the residents or thustate? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important X. • mineral resource;recovery size delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? Discussion: a-b: There are no known mineral resources on the site. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring: None required 15. Cultural Resources.Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical'resource as defined in §15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c. Directly:or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any ha-man-remains,'includingthose interred X outside of formal cemeteries? - . • Discussion: a-d:'The site is not known to contain any significant archaeological or historic materials or resources..It is not located near'any creek ways or waterways or other areas with potential as an archaeological site The project will not result in the destruction of-any archaeological resources or historic buildings. The following are standard mitigation measures to address the potential of any cultural resources being uncovered during construction. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring: 1. Trenching for,utilities and irrigation shall be kept to as shallow a depth as practical, to avoid disturbing potential subsurface resources. - Page 18 Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit, File No. CUP00014 Page 19 •. a., .Potential , Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant -Significant Impact Impact w/Mitigation impact Incorporated 2. For all construction activities, potential to uncover unknown archaeological resources exist. Should any artifacts, cultural remains, or potential resources be encountered:during construction'activities,work in the area of the fmd shall cease and the construction contractor shall notify the Director of Planning. Archaeological features include artifacts of stone, shell, bone, or other natural materials. Association with artifacts includes hearths,house floors, and dumps. Historic artifacts potentially include all by-products of human land use greater than 50 years of age. Human burials, if encountered, require the notification of the County Coroner in addition to the monitoring:archaeologist. The City shall consult with qualified cultural resource specialist,to evaluate the find. If the suspected remains are determined to be potentially significant, all work in the vicinity shall be halted until mitigation measures are incorporated into the design, or the removal of the,resource has been accomplished:in accordance with recommendations by the archaeologist. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation recommendations of the archaeologist prior to commencing work.in the vicinity of the archaeological Fuld. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with consulting a cultural resource specialist and with implementationof mitigation measures. 16. Agricultural Resources. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer,toi the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Depth talent ofConservation as an optional model'to use in.assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland,,Unique Farmland,or Farmland X of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and • Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? • b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a X Williamson Act contract? c. Involve other Changes in the existing environment which, X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural'use? Discussion: a-c: The site is located in a urbanized,area,and'is not used as farmland nor is it located within a Williamson Act contract. Therefore,no impacts to agricultural resources will occur as a result of this proposal. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring:None required. 17. Mandatory Findings of Significance. Yes . No a: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, - X substantially reduce the'habitat of fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife populationto.drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten toeliininate a plant or animal community,.reducelthe number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or • animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively X considerable?("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a • project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects)? d. Does the project have environmentaleffects which will cause substantial adverse.effects X on hurnan beings, either directly or indirectly? • Page 19 . Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP00014 Page 20 Potential Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/Mitigation Impact Incorporated _ Discussion: a-d: The proposed uses are conditionally permitted under the R-1-6;500 residential zoning. With the incorporation of mitigation measures into the proposal, the project would not have a significant effect on the environment:-achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals; have cumulative adverse impacts; or cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings: Mitigation Measures/Monitoring: IMPLEMENTATION: 1, The applicant shall be required to obtain all'required permits from responsible agencies and provide proof of compliance to the City prior to issuance of grading or building permits or approval of improvement plans. 2. The=.applicant shall incorporate all applicable code provisions and required mitigation measures and conditions into the design and,improvement.plans and specifications for the project. 3. The applicant shall notify all employees, contractors, and agents involved.,in the project implementation of the mitigation measures and conditions applicable to the•project and shall ensure compliance with such measures and conditions. Applicant shall notify all assigns and transfers of the same. MONITORING: 1. The Building Division, Planning, Engineering and Fire DepaiLitents shall review the improvement and construction plans for conformance with the approved project description and all applicable codes, conditions mitigation measures, and permit requirements prior to approval of a site design_review,. improvement plans, grading,or building permits. 2. Mitigation Measures required during construction shall be listed as conditions on'the building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. 9, City inspectors shall insure that construction activities occur consistent with the approved plans and conditions of approval. CONSTRUCTION: 1. The applicant shall designate a project manager with authority to implement all mitigation measures and conditions of approval and provide name, address, and phone numbers to the City prior to issuance of any grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. 2. Mitigation measures required during construction shall be listed as conditions on the building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction: City inspectors shall insure that construction activities occur consistent with the approved plans and conditions of approval. 1, Wayne Miller, Lieb & Miller Architecture Planning, the project applicant on behalf of the Salvation„Army, have reviewed this Initial Study and hereby a ee to incorporate the mitigation measures and monitoring programs identified herein into'.the project. M-A1- 3 �J+�U,;'. .2c1 Lid 2.410.‘ • ,{CIA 1 Signature of Applicant el nt Ja ,e }{o .11Et_ D f t t` Date Planning/plandept/is/saivationarmy 'ra�y4�'�"� 'first' T me y • A)c..at btf'Ei tiw Asti t .4tt) Page 20 Project Name: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP00014 Page 20 • Potential Less Than Less Than No •. _ "� Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/Mitigation Impact _ Incorporated Discussion: a-d:The proposed uses are conditionally permitted under the R-1-6,500 residential zoning. With the incorporation of mitigation measures into the proposal, the project would not have a significant effect on the environment achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals,-have cumulative adverse impacts; or cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring: IMPLEMENTATION: • • 1. The applicant shall be;requiredto obtain all required-permits from responsible agencies and provide proof of compliance to the City prior to issuance of grading or building penults or approval of improvement plans. 2. The applicant shall incdtporatel all applicable code provisionsandlrequired mitigation measures and conditions into the'design and improvement plans and specifications for.the:prbject. — 3. The applicant shall notify all employees, contractors, and agents involved in the project implementation of the mitigation measures and conditions applicable to the project,and shall ensure compliance with such measures and conditions. Applicant shall,notify all assigns and transfers of the same. MONITORING: • • The Building Division, Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments shall review the improvement and construction plansffor confonnahce-with the approved project description and all applicable codes, conditions, mitigation measures, and permit requirements prior Co approval of a site design review, improvement plans, grading, or building permits: 2. Mitigation Measures required during construction.shall be listed as conditions on the building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. 3. City inspectors shall insure that constructionactivitie`s occur consistent with the approved plans and conditions of approval. CONSTRUCTION: • 1. The applicant shall designate a project manager with authority to implement all mitigation measures and conditions of approval and provide name, address; and phone numbers to the City prior to issuance of any grading permits and signed by the contractor,responsible for construction. 2. Mitigation measures required during construction shall be listed as conditions on the building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. 3. City inspectors shall insure that construction:activities occur consistent with the approved plans and conditions of approval. . . . I, Wayne Miller, Lieb & Miller Architecture Planning, the project applicant on behalf of the Salvation Army, have reviewed this Initial Study and hereby agree to inco 'orate the mitigation measures and monitoring programs identified herein into the project. • 1 " Signature of Ap• icant Date PI anninetplandepifi s/salvationarmy Page 20 Planning Commission Minutes 'February 13, 2001 • p L U ,. City of Petaluma, California `L1 ''• City Council Chambers CItta`N , City Hall, 11 English.Street frib Petaluma, CA 94952 •-•• Telephone707/778-4301 /Fax.707/778-4498 10,$ ' E-Mail planning(dci.petaluma.caus .• Web Page http://www.ci.petaluria.ca.us 1 EXCERPT 2 .Planning Commission Minutes 3 February 13, 2001 - 7:00 PM 4 5 Commissioners: -Present: Barrett. Broad*, Glass, Monteschio, O'Brien, Vieler; Vouri 6 '7 * Chair 8 9 Staff: George.White;.Planning Manager 10 Bonne Gaebler, Housing Administrator •1-1 Betsi Lewitter, Contract Planner 12 13 - 14 ROLL CALL - 15 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE • 16 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approved as amended. 17 PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 18 DIRECTOR'S REPORT: The Special Meeting of February 26 has been cancelled 19 (Lafferty item will be heard on'February 27). 20 COMMISSIONER'S REPORT: 21 CORRESPONDENCE: Lafferty Ranch Park FEIR Notice; Correspondence from Kay 22 Russo, Injoy Life Club, .Petaluma Health Care District and Priscilla Watt regarding 23 Salvation Army proposal;Letter from interested citizens regarding Basin Street proposal. 24 APPEAL STATEMENT`. Was read. 25 LEGAL RECOURSE STATEMENT: Was noted on the agenda. 26 27 28 NEW BUSINESS: 29 PUBLIC HEARING: 30 31 I. SALVATION ARMY PETALUMA CENTER; CONDITIONAL USE 32 PERMIT' (CUP00014). REQUEST FOR CUP TO ALLOW 33 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A VARIETY OF RELIGIOUS •34 SERVICES, COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY AND SOCIAL PROGRAMS IN 35 THE R-1-6500 ZONING DISTRICT. 721 SOUTH MCDOWELL BLVD., 36 APN 007-570-028 ' airs) emsmicit AasAlbAk gEPot.T Ar c Hnewr • Planning Commission Minutes - February13,2001 1 •2 Betsi Lewitter presented the staff report. _ 3 4 The public hearing was opened. 5 6 Walt Laabs (City Traffic Consultant)—Answered Commissioner's questions. 7 Bonne Gaebler (City Housing Administrator) — Noted City Council priorities — this 8 project addresses four priorities. There will be no housing of homeless on site; defined 9 transitional housing counseling. 10 Wayne Miller (Project Architect) —.Introduced Salvation Army Captain Brian Hoover. 11 Brian Hoover — Pastor of church and director of program. Transitional housing 12 counseling — 36 families have new permanent homes. Increased response for 13 .emergencies. Meeting community needs; major stumbling block for families is finding 14 good, affordable childcare— specifically evening and infant care. All services at one site 15 saves money — makes it,easier for clients. Easily accessible site by car and bus. Clarified 16 family service center--not homeless,singles. Childcare Center is important and new part 17 of services — will be licensed. Evening: hours are driven by need — no evening care 18 available in this community — needed as part of welfare reform. Only overnight use to be 19 in single-family dwelling—will probably be occupied by on-site Manager. 20 Commissioner Monteschio — How many are anticipated to use childcare — would this 21 service be available to others not in Salvation Army counseling programs? 22 Brian Hoover—Yes, services available to all. • 23 Commissioner O'Brien — Is there a requirement for participants to be "clean and 24 sober'? 25 Brian Hoover — Not for walk-ins, but for others. Has not found any drug paraphernalia 26 in the area from participants — no history of any at Washington Street location:, 27 Discussion regarding changing circulation pattern to avoid headlights' in rear yards of 28 adjacent residences. Kitchen in church to be used for church related fellowship activities 29 —not public meals —only related tochurch functions. 30 Wayne Miller — Notes UGB requires infill projects. Want to have positive?:impact on 31 community. Need to balance rights of property owners (including Salvation Army) and 32 needs:of Childcare should,be close to homes, not in commercial or industrial 33 area. Held community meetings for input. Some neighbors felt use was.'not;'appropriate 34 for residential area. Reviewed history of site design. Discussed circulation, locations of 35 play areas, parking lots, design of buildings. Addressed how design evolved to address 36 neighbors' concerns. 37 Allan Tilton — Traffic Engineer— Noted median island poses sight distance problem for 38 people tuming.left out of driveway closest to Caulfield. Discussed circulation. 39 Chairman Broad opened the public hearing for comments. . • 40 . Dr. .Richard Bush - 716 Park Lane — Never thought project of this size would be 41 allowed in residential area; opposed to project — urged denial of Mitigated Negative 42 Declaration and Conditional Use Permit; impacts not mitigated. Asked for more time to 43 work with Salvation Army with Planning Commission as mediator — wants.six±months to 44 work out differences. Questions Mitigation Measure 26 regarding additional fence. How 45 many complaints?, What height? Needs more discussion. Supports Salvation Ariny but •, 46 questions appropriateness of project for this location. Wants until July 1 to work with 2 Planning Commission Minutes - February 13, 2001 •}t Salvation.Army. Concerns regarding decrease in property values. What are proponents 2 using for comparables—where are,other similar facilities? 3 Wayne;Miller What height of fence/soundwall would'be acceptable? 4 Dr. Bush —A study would need to be done. 5 Commissioner Barrett—Questions regarding the number'of neighborhood meetings. 6 Dr. Bush — Three meetings over several months. Salvation..Army stated what they were 7 going to do —'not open to suggestions. 8 Commissioner Barrett Quite a bit a time to discuss "sound walls" and issues. Had 9 time to come up with alternatives. 10 Commissioner O'Brien —Noted he visited homes in area to discuss project. Asked what . 11 would be done to make the project welcome? Dr. Busch already said he doesn't want 12 project—how could it be changed to make it acceptable? 13 Dr. Bush —Realizes this is a tough situation— can't be resolved tonight —need more "in- 14 depth bartering". Feels "intimidated'by good works" of Salvation Army. 15 John Records — COTS 210 4th Street — enthusiastically supports project. Childcare 16 single most important service to get people back on their feet. Beneficial for entire 17 community. Managed similar facilities—,don't have problems with families. 18 Scott Steel — 1420 Sarkesian Agreed with Dr. Bush regarding need for additional 19 studies. 'Large corporation overrunning neighborhood. Submitted written comments and 20 questionnaire.. 21 Suzanne Zanatti — 1420 Sarkesian — Before they contemplating buying a home in this 2 area, they went to the Planning. Department to see what could occur on this site. They 23 were advised it was a residential zoning district. Most proposed uses have nothing to do 24 with religious uses. Planning Commission has duty to protect health, safety and welfare 25 of neighbors — concern regarding traffic, transients, noise. Wants study to include 26 Sarkesian — limit day care hours and hours of construction, City representative with 24- 27 hour phone number to teSO We problems, etc. 28 John Shady(?) — Works with food kitchen; noted need for`;food assistance for working 29 families; supports project, meets needs of hungry families. 30 Kay Russo — President of Petaluma Health Care District Board of Directors - Lives in 31 neighborhood of proposal — social services are ministries of churches and therefore are 32 religious activities. Affordable childcare one of most pressing needs. Need for pantry 33 services growing. Lived near school since 1971 — happy sounds of children, athletic 34 games, etc. equal community sounds. If neighbors don't want to be around children, they 35 should move to an adult community. Don't deny Salvation Army taking care of children 36 in community. 37 Leslie Robbins — 1416 Sarkesian — If she wanted a house near a school, should would 38 have bought one — chose not to be near a school. Concerns regarding lights disturbing 39 sleep, not a problem with what the Salvation Army does, only the location. Doesn't like 40 parking in center of site —too much noise. Childcare could.end between 5-6PM. 4! Reverend Markham — Senior pastor of Petaluma.Baptist Church — Supports uses and 42 _ location proposed. Notes locationun heart of City and neighborhood — makes,clients feel 43 valued instead of"'marginalized Important to teach children compassion — how can that •44 be taught if the people needing help are always hidden? Urged,approval. 45 Brian Sheridan - 1429 Sarkesian — Concerns regarding quality of life. Submitted letter 46 outlining concerns. • 3 Planning Commission Minutes - February 13, 2001 1 Richard Dominicelli — 1412 Tanager Lane — Lives two blocks from project; urges 2 Planning Commission to delay decision,to allow people who hadn't previously heard of • 3 project time to learn about it. 4 Chair Broad — Questions regarding after-hours program for school-age children. 5 Commissioner Vouri inquired about the legality of delaying a decision on the project for 6 six months. 7 George White —Notes decision timeline on page 9 of staff report. 8 Commissioner Monteschio suggests police in attendance ;address, 'Planning 9 Commission. 10 it Evans, Police Dept Available to answer questions; one case of confidential nature 11 at existing site—not serious At previous site, 1 or 2 responses within 10-12 years. 12 Commissioner Barrett— What about traffic situation—accidents at McDowell'? 13 Betsi Lewitter—Shows' with six-accidents in four years—four in intersection. 14 Commissioner O'Brien —Any health and safety,problems at previous site? 15 R. Evans—Not'aware of any. _ 16 Commissioner Vieler—Any concern regarding counseling and childcare on same site? 17 Betsi Lewitter Notes childcare to be State licensed and investigated by State. 18 Childcare use separate from counseling'and food distribution. 19 Chair Broad — Asks Planning Commission for issues to be discussed so they can be 20 addressed one at a time. 21 Commissioner Monteschio — Concerns with number of parking spaces if meeting 22 spaces are allowed to be used. Wants cell phone number available to neighbors in.icase Of • 23 complaints. 24 Commissioner Glass — Need for facility, compelling government.interest, limited period 25 of time to continue to ensure neighbors know;.height of fence — don't wait for complaints 26 — Option.2—lower pole., 27 Commissioner Barrett — Need to clarify zoning laws — warehouses, childcare until 28 10:00.PM — not 2:00 AM — possibility for expansion'? Septic system and leach field on 29 site; sound walls guidelines for community use of property — especially for late night 30 usage. What kind of social programs?Available to anyone who drops in'? 31 Commissioner Vouri — Agrees with other Planning Commissioners — traffic on 32 Sarkesian, perceived loss in property values ir CUP granted; past permitting check 33 process to ensure project being done according to conditions. 34 Commissioner O'Brien — Wants notice of other community meetings so he could attend 35 —he lives in neighborhood, but outside 500'. 36 Commissioner Vieler — Needs answers from City Attorney - questions regarding zoning 37 and permitting,process, i.e.: whether the proposed storage = warehouse and,;therefore, is 38 not allowed in,a residential district; religious land use act;,neighbors have valid concerns 39 is any use.proposed unable;to_be questioned or denied? Parking concerns.. 40 Commissioner Broad — Requested City Attorney presence at next meeting to answer 41 questions. 42 Commissioner Glass— Would like brief closed session with City Attorney. 43 Chair Broad — Asked staff to consult with City Attorney to see if closed session is 44 allowed. Continuing this item will allow neighbors to discuss further with Salvation 45 Army. • 46 Commissioner Barrett — Dr: Bush should give information he received regarding loss in 47 property values to"staff to research. 4 Planning Commission Minutes - February 13, 2001 Si Discussion regarding how staff could research loss of property values. 2 George White noted he doesn't know-how except anecdotal or conjecture. 3 Chair Broad — Wants City Attorney to determine if loss in property value should be 4 considered in making a decision. 5 Commissioner Vieler suggested that the sources submit written information to the 6 Planning Commission. 7 Discussion regarding sound wall. • 8 Commissioner Vieler — Wants Planning Commission to give direction — seems 9 mitigation is necessary. 10 Commissioner Vouri — Agrees — Sound wall and "light mitigating" wall on north side of 11 property to block lights from cars; refer to project architect. 12 Chair Broad — Agrees with Commissioner Glass regarding lower lights — option 2 as 13 proposed by photometric report; check with landscape architect regarding possibility of 14 additional screening on north side within 2' strip —northwest planter strip. 15 Commissioner Vieler —Examine if masonry or wood sound wall should be used — refer 16 back to acoustical.consultant: 17 Chair Broad — What height;fence/wall.appropriate'to block light? Considering service of 18 great value to community — considering new law (RLUIPA) would prefer to approve 19 CUP rather than find a new site. 20 Commissioner Glass —.As much landscaping as possible, agrees with need for services — 21 childcare and food distribution. Would be difficult to come up with compelling 02 government.interest to deny. 23 Commissioner Vouri — Glad that this is being continued to a future meeting; obligation 24 of Planning Commission to hear from public — try to resolve issues in best interest of 25 everyone. Compliments Salvation Army on approach. — community meetings, 26 redesigning site plan, addressing lighting, use of landscaping to mitigate. Family- 27 oriented moderate use appropriate for site. Childcare should be in residential 28 neighborhoods. Walked site normal noise for McDowell — extremely loud. Will support 29 project, but wants to mitigate impacts. 30 Chair Broad — Most of concerns regarding childcare and hours of childcare. Wants 31 opinion from City Attorney.regarding whether childcare element regulated by RLVIPA. 32 Need to determine if 10:00 PM is an appropriate ending time.. 33 Commissioner Barrett — Favors projects but has problem with RLVIPA. Concern 34 regarding not being able to control. Childcare needs to go to 10:00 PM. Concern other 35 uses being allowed to go to 10:00PM; condition no evening.programs" 36 Commissioner Vieler — Regarding RLVIPA — appropriate to use law for religious 37 services, but not everything termed as ministry? Supports project - has value and merit, 38 but shares neighbor's concerns. Wants,specific conditions prohibiting expansion of uses. 39 Chair Broad — Concern regarding additional evening use by other groups. Concern 40 regarding 25% reduction in parking when don't know of all uses on site Neighbors 41 concerns typical for in-fill sites. Asks about storage/warehouse being allowed in R-1 42 Zoning District. 43 Commissioner Vieler — wants City Attorney opinion regarding storage space being • 44 allowed,, 45 Commissioner O'Brien —Agrees City Attorney opinion needed. 46 ChairBroad'— Wants staff to review letters submitted to Planning Commission— include 47 items related to Initial Study, i.e. traffic impacts on Sarkesian. 5 • Planning Commission Minutes - February 13, 2001 1 Commissioner Vieler, — Any other side streets which might be used — i.e..across street • 2 (McDowell). 3 Commissioner Vouri.— Septic and leach field—assess in Initial Study. 4 Chair`Broad — Parking standards based on number of seats in chapel. 25% reduction — 5 needs to be reviewed by engineer whether number:of spaces is adequate. 6 Commissioner Vieler — Peak uses and number of people— need complete tally of uses 7 (see Petaluma Baptist Church information). 8 • 9 A motion was made by Commissioner. Glass and seconded by Commissioner O'Brien to 10 continue this item to the Planning,Commission Meeting of March 27, 2001' and to mail a 11 public notice to 500' of site(including Tanager Lane). 12 13 Commissioner Barrett: Yes - 14 Commissioner Monteschio:.Yes: 15 Commissioner O'Brien: Yes 16 Commissioner Vieler: Yes 17 Commissioner Vouri: Yes 18 Chair Broad: Yes 19 20 21 22 Adjournment: 11:10 PM 23 S\PC-Planning Commission\Minutes\021301.doc • • • • 6 CITY OF PETALUNIA, CALIFORNIA - - 1 z MEMORANDUM 3 4 Community Development Department,Planning Division, 11 English Street,Petaluma, CA 94952 5 (707) 778-4301 Fax(707) 778-4498 E-mail,planning@e1petaluma.ca:us • 6 7 DATE: March 27, 2001 - 8 9 TO: Planning Commission 10 11 FROM: Betsi Lewitter, Project Planner • 12 13 SUBJECT: Salvation Army Conditional Use Peiurit 14 721 South McDowell Boulevard 15 APN 007-570-028 16 • 17 ls. PROJECT DESCRIPTION'AND'BACKGROUND 19 20 The Salvation Army is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow construction and operation of religious services and social programs on an approximately 2 acre site in the R-1-6,500 zoning district. The site is currently developed with a church and two 23 single-family homes. 24 25 The Salvation Army intends to construct a new 150-seat chapel,.a social services and supplies 26 building and a childcare center.The social services and supplies building will be used for general 27 social services including transitional housing counseling, job, counseling, utility assistance 28 interviews and grocery distribution. These services will occur inside the building between 9:00 29 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Monday through' Friday, except for Thursday when general social services 30 will be by appointment only between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The childcare center will be state 31 licensed for a maximum of 60 children, preschool age and,younger, who will be cared for by 8- 32 10 paid staff members. Childcare will be available from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The later:hours 33 are proposed in order to accommodate entry-level workers whose shifts are often during the 34 evening. The existing church building is to be remodeled and used for Sunday school and 35 occasional meetings as well as an after school program for 15-20 school-aged children. The after 36 school program will be conducted during the school year only and will end at 6:00 p.m. Three to 37 five adults will supervise the children and assist with homework. One existing dwelling on the 38 property, which is currently used as a multi-purpose building, will be demolished. The other • 39 house on the property will continue to be used as a dwelling. A total of 23,059 square feet of 40 building floor area, 50 parking spaces and associated landscape will exist on the site after all 41 construction is completed. 42 • The Neighborhood Church, which was granted a Conditional Use Permit in 1974, previously occupied the site. Section 26-511 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance states that Use Permits 45 `...run with the land and shall be valid for the successors in interest of the original grantee". 46 Therefore, the Salvation Army has been operating at the site under the Use Permit issued for the C /T y C ONCI L 4r40 *psi' 1 GN J .3 i Neighborhood Church. In order to expand the uses, the Salvation.Army is requesting a new • 2 Conditional Use Permit. • 4 Per Section 20-300 of the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance; all the proposed uses on the site would 5 require 64 off-street parking spaces. However; pursuant to Section 20-603,the Planning Manager 6 has determined, based on the applicant's Master Schedule of Operations, that a 25 percent 7 reduction in,the required off-street parking is permitted because the uses will be staggered to 8 such an extent that the reduced number of spaces would be adequate to serve all uses sharing the 9 facility. With the 25 percent reduction, a total of 48 parking spaces are required; 50 will be - 10 provided. 11 12 For additional,project details, please see the previous staff report attached as Attachment 3 and 13 the discussion under the>trafficheading later in this memo. 14 15 The Planning Commission heard testimony for and against the granting of the CUP at;a lengthy 16 public hearing held on February 13, 2001. The item was continued pending additional 17 information regarding the following issues; The City Attorney's opinions on The-Religious Land 18 Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, storage in the R-1 zoning district and possible 19 reduction in property values; noise; lighting;traffic landscaping and the adequacy of the parking 20 based on the Master Schedule of Operations. 21 • 22 CITY ATTORNEY OPINIONS 23 The Commission requested input from the City Attorney on several issues: 1) whether the . 24 childcare element of the project, as well as the other ministries of the Salvation Army (e.g. food 25 distribution and counseling services) are subject to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized 26 Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA); 2) whether the 2,300 square feet of storage in the proposed 27 Social Services building qualifies as a warehouse which is not permitted in R-1 districts; and 3) 28 whether any alleged loss in values for neighboring properties occurring as a result of the project 29 should be evaluated in the Initial Study of Environmental Impacts and whether the potential 30 losses should be considered by the Planning Commission in their deliberations. The attorney will 31 not be able to attend'the meeting (see Attachment 4). 32 33 Religious Land Use and Institutionalized PersonsiAct of 2000 34 The City Attorney has written a memo responding to the Commissioners' questions (Attachment 35 4). Basically, Mr. Rudnansky has advised that if the Salvation Army states that the childcare and 36 other social services to be offered at the facility constitute a "religious exercise," then they . 37 probably do under the law.;However, the City Attorney also notes that the Salvation Army has 38 agreed to all mitigation measures and conditions of approval. If the Salvation Army did not`agree 39 with imposed conditions, they would have to exhaust the administrative procedures by appealing 40 any conditions of approval that they believed to restrict religious activity to the,City Council 41 within 14 days of Planning Commission 'approval, prior to any litigation. If they accept the 42 benefits granted by the CUP and do not appeal, then/the usual result is a waiver of the right to 43• further legal challenge. 44 45 Storage Use 46 Mr. Rudnansky confirmed that the proposed 2,300 square feet of storage area is permitted in the a 47 R-1 zoning district. He notes that zoning'uses are categorized according to their primary use and 48 that such categories assume and permit a variety of ancillary and related uses. The storage of 49 food items, disaster relief supplies and vehicles appears to be incidental or ancillary to the 2 1 . primary use of the property for educational, religious, cultural;and other.quasi-public purposes. 4;; Ir. Rudnansky advises-this is comparable to single-family homeowners who use portions of their property for storage of personal items. 4 5 Property Values 6 The City Attorney has agreed that the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) does not 7 require the alleged loss of property values that may result from the project to be considered in the 8 Initial Study. The guidelines make it clear that "social and economic effects are not to be 9 considered a significant environmental effect and need be considered only to the extent they are 10 relevant to an anticipated physical change in the environment or, on the basis of substantial 11 evidence, are reasonably likely--to result in physical change to the environment". Mr. Rudnansky 12 goes on to state that speculation and unsubstantiated iopinion do not constitute substantial 13 evidence. With regard to the role the alleged loss of property values should play in the Planning 14 Commissioners' decision, the City Attorney advised that it is not necessary to consider the 15 alleged loss unless it will deprive the property owners of all viable economic use of their 16 properties so as to constitute a "taking" under the constitution. 17 18 In addition; the Planning Commission requested that aniopponent'to the project supply written 19 confirmation from real estate agents that property values would indeed be negatively affected by 20 the project. Dr. Bush has provided a letterfrom Don Angotti, of Redwood Empire Appraisal, in 21 which he opines that the property values in the area would decline by as much as 20 percent. 22 Concurring opinions, in the form of notes written.on the original letter by Mr. Angotti or in the a form of answers to a questionnaire distributed by Dr. Bush were also`provided (Attachment 5). 25 NOISE 26 The Commission requested .additional analysis from the acoustical engineer as to whether a 27 masonry or wood fence should be used to mitigate sound and whether the proposed 15-gallon 28 trees would adequately buffer sound or whether larger trees should be used 29 30 A March 7, 2001, addendum,(Attachment 6) wvas submitted by Acoustical Engineers Illingworth 31 and Rodkin in response to Commissioners' and neighbors' requests '(see Public Comments 32 below). The report explained the method of measuring noise at the property line fence and 33 concluded that additional ambient noise measurements made:on the residential side of the fence 34 would not provide any new information. The report also explained the methods of establishing 35 the noise level to be expected from the toddlers and preschoolers and noted that the toddler 36 playground was,not excluded from the:original study: With regard to noise impacts from grounds 37 maintenance equipment, the consultant suggested that the use of ground maintenance equipment 38 be restricted to 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. to reduce any potential annoyance (added as a 39 recommended condition of approval 43). The consultant was asked whether a wood or masonry 40 sound wall should be constructed due to the concern of one neighbor that the sound would 41 bounce and produce an echo off a masonry wall. The noise expert advised that sound can bounce • 42 off both masonryand wood walls. However, this effect only occurs when there are two surfaces, 43 such as two fences or a fence and an acoustically reflective building façade, placed in close 44 proximity and parallel to one another. Therefore, the noise consultant did "not expect that there will be a perceptible increase in sound levels at the residences due to sound bouncing off of any type of either a masonry or wood wall". Lastly, the report stated that although "trees or other 47 types of foliage can be useful in''damping" higher frequency sound... they cannot act as a sound 48 barrier:" `Smaller trees may be more effective in providing a noise damping effect since their 49 leafy foliage will be closer to the sources of noise than larger plants." 3 1 2 LIGHTING • 3 An addendum to the photometric study was requested to,ascertain whether the proposed 6 foot 4 high wood perimeter fence would be adequate to block the light from cars' headlightsintruding 5 into the rear yards. of the neighbors on Sarkesian. Drive and, if not, what height would be 6 appropriate. 7 8 The Winzler & Kelly engineering firm submitted an addendum to the Photometric Study:which 9 addresses whether a 6 foot wood perimeter fence would be adequate to block the light from cars' 10 headlights intruding into the rear yards of the neighbors on Sarkesian Drive. :In.his March 9, 11 2001, letter(Attachment 7), engineer Shishir Doctor concludes that a 6,foot solid fence located at 12 the property line would be adequate to prevent headlight glare from falling on a single-story 13 residence set back 40 feet from the property line. A taller fence may be appropriate in locations 14 where the house is-set back less than 40 feet. 15 16 TRAFFIC 17 An addendum to the traffic analysis was. requested to 1) analyze potential impacts on 18 surrounding streets from "cut-through" traffic;. 2) to consider both the on-site circulation as 19 proposed and an alternative:whereby the northerly driveway would be used only for ingress and 20 the southerly driveway would be used for both ingress and egress (which would allow only right 21 turns out of the site and could promote additional "cut-through" traffic); and 3) -whether the 22 proposed 50 parking spaces would be adequate for all the uses on site. 23 24 In his March 12`h correspondence (Attachment 8); traffic engineer Allan Tilton`reviewed the fb- 25 requests and method of analysis. Mr. Tilton concluded that with the driveway configuration as 26 proposed, only one additional vehicle would be anticipated to use Sarkesian Drive or Marian 27 Way during the p.m. peak hour. That would mean 10 additional vehicles per day. Since the 28 current daily traffic volumes are below 25 percent of the ideal capacity of the.streets, this minor 29 increase would not constitute a significant impact. With the suggested circulation alternative, 30 which would restrict;the left..turn•movements from the site, the resulting impact on Sarkesian or 31 Marian Way could be as great as an additional 10 vehicles during the p.m. peak hour or 100 32 vehicles per day. Again, the resulting traffic volumes would still remain well below the ideal 33 capacities of both streets. 34 35 Mr. Tilton reviewed,the`Master Schedule of Operations, and based on Saturday when the church 36 facility could be in full use and the daycare center in operation, it was the traffic engineer's 37 opinion that the site meets the City's on-site parking requirements. See additional discussion of 38 parking under.Master Schedule of Operations. 39 40 The City's traffic engineer, Walt Laabs, reviewed, Mr. Tilton's report and agreed with the 41 conclusions (included with Attachment 8). Mi. Laabs stated; "The impacts on Park Lane would . 42 be similar to those on Sarkesian Way, i.e. an increase of 10 vehicles per day with the proposed 43 counter=clockwise circulation plan and an increase of 100 vehicles per day with a clockwise 44 circulation-plan.:In both cases there will bean insignificant impact on the surrounding residential 45 streets." Mr. Laabs also agreed that the greatest parking demand would be when the church is at 46 maximum occupancy during the period when the day care center is in operation. The, 47 requirement for the two uses would be 46 spaces. 48 - 4 1 LANDSCAPE 21,he.landscape architect was to be consulted to determine if additional screening could be placed 3 Within the'2-foot planter between the driveway and the residential' properties and whether the 4 proposed 15-gallon trees (some of which are deciduous) would adequately buffer sound. 5 6 Landscape Architect Louise Leff has reviewed the planting plan:in light of the neighbors' (see 7 Public Comments below) and Commissioners' concerns. In her March 8, 2001, letter 8 (Attachment 9), she advised that the deciduous Acer trees at the back of the property have been 9 changed to 24-inch box evergreen trees. The Pistacia tree has been changed to an evergreen large 10 shrub that can be grown as a tree"; however, Ms. Leff recommends that the size of this plant not 11 be increased because it will grow faster if planted from a 15 gallon. She does not recommend 12 more density in the plantings because the trees need space to properly establish. With regard to 13 the possibility of additional plantings in the two-foot planter strip between the residential 14 properties and the northern Salvation ,Army driveway, Ms. Leff notes that the proposed 15 evergreen hedge (Rhanmus alaternus) will grow tall very quickly and stay evergreen. According 16 to the Sunset New Western Garden Book,this plant grows fast and dense to 12 —20 feet or more 17 with spreading just as wide; if can be pruned to keep it narrow. The book also notes that this 18 plant provides a tall screen above, a 6-foot fence. The 'landscape will be subject to thorough 19 review and approval by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee (SPARC). In 20 response to the neighbors' request that the perimeter trees be installed immediately, Ms: Leff 21 advised that as long as the soil is properly prepared, the trees could be planted prior to 22 construction. MASTER SCHEDULE OF OPERATIONS • 25 The Commission requested a revised.Master Schedule of Operations to reflect all proposed.uses 26 including days and hours of operation and the expected number' of participants in order to 27 determine if there will be adequate parking on the site (Attachment 10). Concern was expressed 28 at the first public hearing that the original schedule of operations did not include any special 29 events at the facility. In addition to the submitted Master Schedule; Captain Hoover has advised 30 that church and community special events will be limited to one or two Saturdays per month, 31 between the hours of noon and .6:00 p.m. The maximum number of people expected ranges 32 between 100 and 125. Although wedding.receptions may be held in the Fellowship Hall, no 33 alcohol, other than a champagne toast, will be permitted. During, the weekdays, the proposed 34 social service uses will require;10 parking spaces and the childcare center will require up to 10 35 spaces, leaving 27 parking spaces available (3 of the total 50 parking spaces are for the 36 residential use). The Salvation Army will make the church administration building available for 37 community meetings fora maximum of 20 people between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., 38 except on Thursdays when the general social services are by appointment only and the 10 spaces 39 reserved for the social services building will not be used. On that day, community meetings 40 would be permitted for a.maximum of 30 people. If a;problem arises,.the maximum number of 41 attendees pei witted at community uses in the administration building can easily be reduced. 42 43 PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS 44 • Pursuant to the Commission's request, a notice advising of the continued.public hearing was sent to properties within 600 feet of the site. This boundary was extended further to include additional 47 properties on Tanager Lane. The notice also advised neighbors that the Salvation Army 48 hold a fourth community meeting on the project site on March 5. As of the writing of this staff 49 report, another 7 letters in opposition to the project and 2 additional letters in support of the 5 1 project have been received. In addition, .copies of correspondence to Captain Hoover were 2 received in the,Planning,office. (All correspondence included in Attachment 11.) 3 110 4 In the February 25 letter from Scot Steele, Richard Bush and Brian .Sheridan (included in 5 Attachment 11), requests and concerns of the Eastside Neighborhood Alliance were listed. In 6 addition to the issues addressed in the°supplemental studies cited above, the letter stated that the 7 CUP must address who would be residing in the single-family dwelling on the site, allow for 8 periodic review of the Salvation Army operations,;the,provision of information regarding police 9 reports for the previous~Salvation Army site on Washington Street and the existing site, review to by the Petaluma Building Department, perimeter fencing, surface drainage onto adjacent lots, t1 construction hours, potential expansion of services, adequacy of the Initial Study,-and'neighbor 12 input at time of SPARC review. 13 14 In response, Captain Hoover has advised that upon,completion of the project, an administrative 15 assistant will be hired by the Salvation Army and will be housed in the single-family dwelling on 16 the site Upon Captain Hoover's suggestion, a condition of approval has been added (#4) to 17 require two seats on their Advisory Board to be filled by two residents of the neighborhood. The I8 Board meets monthly and would address any operating concerns. Between meetings, neighbors 19 may contact Captain Hoover or the administrative assistant with any problems(see;condition of 20 approval #5). 21 22 Prior to the first public hearing, staff contacted the Petaluma Police Department to ascertain.if 23 there were any problems at the Salvation Army's former site as well as at the new site As stated 24 in the February 13 staffreport, no reports-were filed with the Police Department o f any problems • 25 with clientsrat the old location. There was one report of a-confidential nature at the new site. 26 27 The plans have already been preliminarily reviewed by the Building Department and will be 28 thoroughly reviewed at the time of building permit application. A soils repot[ will be required at 29 that time. 30 31 Staff notes that the standard conditions of approval prohibit lot-to-lot drainage and restrict the. 32 days and hours of construction. _ 33 34 As required by recommended condition of approval No.1, any change to the services to be 35 provided as described in the applicant's-Project Statement, would require a modification to the 36 CUP. 37 38 The Eastside Neighborhood Alliance letter erroneously assumes that the project architect 39 completed the.Initial Study of Environmental Impacts. In fact, as the Planning Commission is. 40 aware, this document was prepared by staff as a representative of the lead agency as required by 41 the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The information contained in the document 42 was taken directly from City documents, information supplied by various City departments and 43 the consultants' reports. CEQA does not require a peer review of the contents of the document.. 44 As part of the project review, the Planning Commission 'considers the adequacy of the 45 . environmental document; if the document is found to adequately assess the potential 46 environmental impacts, the Commission may adopt a Negative Declaration with mitigation • 47 measures based on the findings of the Initial Study. 48 6 • 1 nor to.SPARC review, a public notice will be sent to properties within 300 feet of the subject 2�te This notice wilhadvise`any interested parties of the opportunity to comment on the plans. 4 The existing perimeter fencing is proposed to be repaired and/or replaced where necessary. The 5. fence design would also be subject to SPARC review and approval. 6 7 RECOMMENDATION 8 9 1. Staff recommends that the,Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 finding that the project, with the inclusion of Mitigation Measures, will not have a 11 significant adverse effectomthe environment. 12 13 2. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Salvation Army 14 Conditional Use Permit, based on the attached findings and subject to the attached 15 recommended conditions of approval. 16 17 Attachments: 18 19 1. Findings for Approval • 70 2. Revised Conditioi s,of Approval 21 3. February 13, 2001 Planning.Commission Staff Report 22. 4. City Attorney Memos. 20 5. Property Devaluation Opinions 24 6. March 7, 2001, Illingworth=& Rodkin Supplementary Acoustical Report 25 7. March 9, 2001, Winzler & Kelly Supplementary Photometric.Report 26 8. March 12, 2001, Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation (Allan Tilton) 27 Supplementary Traffic Report and March 13, 2001, Peer Review by Walt Laabs 28 9. March 8, 2001, letter.from Louise Leff, Landscape Architect 29 10. Revised Master Schedule of Operations 30 11. Correspondence 31 12. Initial Study 32 33 34 • 7 1 ATTACHMENT 2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL • 3 SALVATION,ARMY PETALUMA CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 4 5 NOTE: Changes-from original findings/conditions =Italics 6 7 Mitigated'Negative Declaration: 8 9 1, That based upon the Initial Study, potential impacts resulting from the project have been 10 identified. Mitigation measures have been proposed and agreed to by the applicant as,a 11 condition of project approval that will reduce potential impacts to less than significant. 12 In addition, there is no substantial evidence that supports a fair argument that the project, 13 as conditioned and mitigated,would have a significant effect on the environment. 14 15 2. That the project does not have the potential to affect wildlife resources,as defined in the 16 State Fish and Game Code, either individually or cumulatively, and isexempt from Fish 17 and Game filing fees because it is proposed on 2n-existing developed:site surrounded.by 18 urban development with none of the resource`s"as defined in the Code. 19 20 3. That the project is-not located on a site listed on any Hazardous Waste Site,List.compiled 21 by the State pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the California Government Code. 22 23 4. That the Planning Commission reviewed the Initial Study and considered public 24 comments before making a recommendation on the project. • 25 • 26 5. That a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared to ensure compliance with the 27 adopted mitigation measures. 28 29 6. That the record of"proceedings of the decision on the project is available for public 30 review at the City of Petaluma Planning Division,`City Hall, 11 English Street, Petaluma, 31 California. 3, 33 Conditional Use Permit: 34 35 1. That the project; as conditioned, will conform to the requirements and the intent of the 36 Zoning Ordinance and the.General Plan.'Specifically, the proposal implements General 37 Plan Chapter 7, Goal 6 and Chapter 3, Objectives (i) and (o), Chapter 7, Objective (u) and 38 Chapter 9, Objectives (d) and (g). Zoning Ordinance Sections 6-401 and 6-409 39 conditionally permit public and quasi-public buildings and uses of an educational, 40 religious, or public; service nature and daycare in the R-1-6;500. zoning district. The 41 standards for conditional uses under Zoning Ordinance Section 21-300 were considered 42 in the review of this project. 43 44 2. That the use, as conditioned, will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental-to the public 45 welfare of the community. Traffic, noise and lighting studies assert that the project will 46 not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The architectural and 47 landscaping plans will be subject to the review and approval by the. Site Plan and 43 Architectural Review Committee to ensure that the project will be aesthetically,pleasing. 49 • `1 3. The project irifplements`the priorities of the Consolidated Plan II, 2000-2005, adopted by the City Councihon May 15„2000. • • • • • . • • • O 9 I ATTACHMENT2 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - • 3 Salvation Army Petaluma Center Conditional Use Permit(CUP00014) • 4 721 South McDowell,Boulevard 5 6 From the Planning Department 7 1. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is granted to allow construction of a 5,951 square 8 foot, 150-seat chapel; a 5,070 square foot social services and supplies building; a 5,153 9 square'foot childcare center and associated parking and site improvements which shall be 10 substantially as shown on the revised plans dated 11/20/00. The operation of the uses ii shall be as stated in the Applicant's Project Statement revised 11/20/00. Prior to any 12 change in the operation of the uses, the applicant shall apply for and be granted a 13 Conditional Use Permit modification from the City of Petaluma. 14 15 2. Within five days of an approval of the Conditional Use Peinrit, the applicant shall submit 16 a check in the amount of $35.00 payable to the.Sonoma County Clerk for the.Notice of 17 Determination filing fee. 18 19 3. The use of ground maintenance equipment shall be restricted to 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 20 to reduce any potential annoyance. 21 22 4. The Salvation Army.Petaluma Center Advisory Board shall include two people from the 23 South McDowell neighborhood who may attend monthly meetings during which any 24 concerns shall be addressed. Documentation of the appointments shall be received by the • 25 City prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 26 27 5. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, evidence shall be proyidedto.the City that 28 the phone number of the on-call administrative assistant has been provided to adjacent . 29 neighbors for their use in reporting operating problems. 30 31 6. The applicants/developers shall defend, indemnify,and hold harmless the City of any of 32 its boards, commissions, agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or 33 proceeding against'the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers or employees to 34 attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of the project when such claim or action is 35 brought within the time period provided for in.applicable State and/or local statutes. The 36 City shall promptly notify the applicants/ developers of any such, claim, action or 37 proceeding. The City shall coordinate in the defense. Nothing contained in this condition 38 shall prohibit-the City-from participating in a defense of any claim, action, or proceeding 39 if the City bears.its own attorney's fees and costs, and the City defends the action in.good 40 faith. 41 . . • 42 Mitigation Measures - 43 7. All earthwork, grading, trenching, back-filling and compaction operation shall. be 44 conducted in accordance with the City's Grading and_Erosion Control Ordinance (Title 7, 45 Chapter 17.31, of the Municipal Code 46 47 8. All public and/or private improvements shall be subject to inspection by City staff for •- 48 compliance with the approved.Improvement Plans, prior to City acceptance. . 49 10 ITT > McNr 9. The applicant shall submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by a registered professional engineer•; an as integral part of the grading plan. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be,subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Planning 4 Director, prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The Plan shall include temporary 5. erosion control measures to be used during grading operations at the site to prevent 6 discharge of sediment and contaminants into the drainage system. The Erosion and 7 Sediment Control Plan shall include the following measures as applicable. 8 9. Material and equipment for implementation of erosion control measures shall be on 10 -site by October 15t. All grading activity shall be completed by October 15th, prior 11 to the onset of the rainy season, with all disturbed areas stabilized, and, if 12 applicable, revegetated by October 315t. Upon approval by the Petaluma City 13 Engineer, extensions' for short-team grading may be allowed. Special erosion 14 control measures may be required by the City Engineer in conjunction with any 15 specially permitted rainy season grading. 16 17 10. All construction activities shall comply with the Uniform Building Code regulations for 1s seismic safety (i.e., reinforcing perimeter and/or load bearing walls, bracing parapets, 19 etc.). 20 21 The applicant shall incorporate the-following Best Management,Practices into the construction and 22 improvement plans and clearly indicate these provisions in the specifications. The construction • contractor shall incorporate these measures into the 'required'erosion and sediment plan to limit dust and exhaust emissions during construction. 5, . 26 11. Grading and construction equipment operated .during construction activities shall be 27 properly muffled and maintained to minimize emissions. Equipment shall be tuned off 28 when not in use. 29 30 12. Exposed soils shall be watered periodically during construction, a minimum of twice daily. 31 The frequency of watering shall be increased if wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Only 32 purchased City water.orreclaimed water shall be used for this purpose. Watering shall also 33 occur on weekends and holidays when work is not in progress. 34 35 13. Construction sites involving earthwork,shall provide for a gravel pad area consisting of an 36 impe,uueable liner and drain rock at the construction entrance to clean mud and debris from 37 construction vehicles prior to entering the public roadways:. Street surfaces in the vicinity 38 of the project shall be routinely swept and cleaned of mud and dust carried onto the street 39 by construction vehicles. 40 41 14. During excavation activities, haul trucks used to transport soil shall utilize tarps or other 42 similar covering devices to reduce dust emissions: 43 44 15. Applicant shall designate a person with authority to require increased watering to monitor the dust and erosion control program. The name and phone number shall be provided to the City of Petaluma prior to issuance of building permits. 47 48 16. This development,shall be subject to the City's storm drainage impact fees to cover the 49 incremental impact/increase it will have on the City's storm drainage system. . 11 2 17. All grading activity shall be completed prior to the onset of the rainy season. All new • 3 drainage facilities shall be in place and in operation at that time. Grading and excavation 4 activities shall not be permitted during the rainy season. Extensions for :grading and 5 drainage facilities work may be allowed in consultation with the Petaluma City Engineer, 6 based on the sensitivity of the specific project area to erosion, sedimentation, and the 7 effectiveness of temporary (rainy season) erosion measures to be implemented by the 8 applicant. 9 10 18. Plans submitted at time of application:for building permit shall include:provisions for storm 11 water runoff management. The submittal shall reflect installation of permanent signs at 12 drop inlets, if,any, to the public storm drain system, which prohibit the deposit of hazardous 13 materials into the system. 14 15 19. All construction activities shall be performed in a manner that minimizes the sediment 16 and/or pollutants entering directly or'indirectly into the storm,drain system or ground water. 17 The applicant shall incorporate the following provisions into the construction plans and 18 specifications, to be verified by the Planning Department, prior to issuance of grading or -19 building permits: 20 21 a) The'applicant shall designate On the improvement plans construction staging 22 areas and areas for the storage of any hazardous materials (i.e., motor oil, fuels, 23 paints, etc.) to be used during construction. All construction staging areas shall be 24 located away from any stream and adjacent drainage areas to preventrunoff from 25 • construction areas from entering into the drainage system.'Areas designated for 26 storage of hazardous materials shall include proper containment°features'to prevent 27 contamination from entering drainage areas in the event of a spill or leak. 28 29 b) No debris, soil, sand, cement, concrete, or washings thereof, or other 30 construction related materials or wastes, soil or petroleum products or other organic 31 or earthen material shall be allowed. to enter any drainage system. All discarded 32 _ material 'including washings and any accidental spills shall be removed and 33 disposed of at an approved disposal site. The applicant shall designate'appropriate 34 disposal methods and/or facilities on the construction plans or in the specifications. 35 36 20. The.applicant shall submit a detailed grading and drainage plan for review and approval 37 by the City Engineer and Planning Department prior to approval of any improvement 38 plans or the issuance of a .grading peicuit. Project grading and all site drainage: 39 improvements 'shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the City of 40 Petaluma Engineering Department's "Standard Specifications," and with the Sonoma 41 County Water Agency's "Flood Control Design Criteria," if applicable. Drainage plans 42 shall include supporting calculations of stoirn drain and culvert size using acceptable 43 'engineering methods. No lot-to-lot drainage shall be permitted. Surface runoff shall be 44 addressed within each individual 'lot and then conveyed to an appropriate,storm. drain. 45 system. All hydrologic, hydraulic, and storm drain system design, if applicable, shall be 46 subject to review and approval of the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA), and the • 47 City Engineer. 48 • 12 ,1 1. All construction and operation activities shall comply with'-applicable Performance 2� 'Standards in the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code; 4 22. All construction activities shall be limited to 7:00 a.m.. to 6100 p'.m. Monday through 5 Friday and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays.. Construction shall be prohibited on • 6 Sundays and all holidays recognized by the City of Petaluma, 'unless a pefmit is first 7 secured from the City Manager (or his/her designee) for additional hours. There will be 8 no start up of machines nor equipment prior to 8:00 a.m., Monday through Friday; no 9 delivery of materials not equipment prior to 7:30 a.m. nor past•5:00 pin., Monday ` 10 through Friday; no servicing of equipment past 6:45 p.m,;, Monday through Friday. 11 12 23. All construction equipment powered by internal combustion equipment shall be properly 13 muffled and maintained to minimize noise. Equipment shall be turned off when not in 14 ' use. 15 16 24. Construction maintenance,; storage, and staging areas for, construction equipment shall 17 avoid proximity to residential areas to the maximum extent practicable.'Stationary 18 construction equipment, such as compressors, mixers, etc., shall be placed away from, . 19 residential areas and/or„provided with acoustical shielding. Quiet construction equipment 20 shall be used when possible. 21 22 25. The applicant shall designate.a Project Manager with authority to implement the mitigation measures who will be responsible for responding to any complaints from the neighborhood, 2 prior to issuance of a building/grading permit. The Project Manager shall determine the 25 cause of noise complaints;(e.g. starting too early, faulty muffler, etc.) and shall take prompt 26 action to correct the problem. 27 28 26. Optimize the site plan to minimize•adverse effects•on the adjacent neighbors. Play areas for 29 preschoolers should be located as far away from the property line as feasible and the use of 30 elevated play structures should beminimized. 31 32 27. If windows are proposed on the rear of the building adjacent to the residences, these 33 windows should be kept closed during noisy indoor play periods. If complaints are 34 received, windows could be fixed closed. 35 36 28. If noise complaints due to outdoor play activity are received-from neighbors once the center 37 is in operation, a secondary solid wood or masonry block wall shall be built either-around 38 the play are or parallel to the existing property line fences on the Salvation.Army side of 39 the property line to attenuate noise. These walls should be built to a height which will block 40 the line of sight from the children in the play areas to the rear yards or outdoor use areas of 41 the residences, - 42 43 29. All exterior lighting shall be directed onto the project site and access .ways and shielded to 44 prevent glare and intrusion onto adjacent residential properties. Plans submitted for project review and approval shall incorporate lighting plans, which reflect the location and design ipof all exterior lighting proposed. In no case shall the maximum illumination at ground level 47 . exceed 3 footcandle. 48 13 1 30. Shade trees shall be incorporated along public streets and within parking areas in 2 conformance with the City's Site Plan and Architectural Review Guidelines to reduce glare 3 and provide shade and.screening. _ 4 5 31. Architectural detail, lighting plans, landscaping plans, specifications on parking lot layout 6 and detailed site plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Site Plan and 7 Architectural Review Committee.prior to issuance of building permits: 8 . 9 32. Fixtures providing security lighting-shall be'controlled by integral photocells, set to turn the 10 fixture on from dusk to dawn or when the,light level falls below the preset threshold. All I I other fixtures shall be controlled by a universal'7-day time clock that can be programmed 12 for time of day operation. The lights shall be set to turn off at close of;business. 13 14 33. . The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of the City's Traffic Mitigation Fees. 15 Traffic Mitigation Fees shall be calculated at the time of issuance of a building pent and 16 shall be due and payable before final inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 17 18 34. During non-working hours, open trenches and construction hazards within the public right- 19 of way shall be provided with signage, flashers, and barricades approved by the Street 20 Superintendent to wam oncoming motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians of potential safety 21 hazards. 22 23 35. All road surfaces shall be restored to pre-project conditions after completion of any project- 24 related utility installation activities. All trench pavement restoration within existing asphalt 25 streets shall receive a slurry seal. 26 27 36. Frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the city's Street Standards to 28 provide for safe access to and from the site Curb cuts, signing, and striping, if applicable, 29 shall be incorporated into the design as required by the City's `traffic 'Engineer: 30 Improvement or construction plans shall be subject to review and approval of the'Traffic 31 Engineer prior to issuance of a grading or building permit. All street frontage 32 improvements shall be constructed to City standards and inspected by City Inspectors prior 33 to final inspections or acceptance of improvements. 34 35 37. Appropriate signs shall be installed,at the southerly driveway to prohibit outbound left-turn 36 movements onto McDowell.Boulevard South. 37 38 38. The project shall be subject:to the payment of established City Special Development Fees 39 as applicable, including: Park and. Recreation Land Improvements, Sewer and Water 40 connection, and Traffic Mitigation as specified by City-Resolution. 41 42 39. In order to ensure public safety and provide for police surveillance; all non-residential. 43 buildings and public use areas shall have security alarms and provide motion or heat 44 sensitive security lighting to parking areas, pedestrian pathways and areas of concealment 45 around the perimeter of each building. All parking areas and pedestrian pathways shall 46 provide;visual access to the extent practicable from public streets and may require mirrors • 47 placed on an angle to be seen from the street or public right-of-way to provide visual access 48 to areas of potential concealment. 49 14 ' 1 40. Prior to the issuance ofa Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide and maintain iscurrent emergency'contact information on file at the Police.Department. 4 1. The project sponsor shall be required to pay for additional water and sewer connections as established in the City's'Special Development Fee handout. 6 7 42. Trenching for utilities and irrigation shall be kept to as shallow a depth as practical, to 8 avoid disturbing potential-subsurface resources. 9 10 43. For all construction activities, potential to uncover unknown archaeological resources exist. 11 Should any artifacts, cultural remains, or potential resources be encountered .during 12 construction activities, work in the area of the find shall cease and the. construction 13 contractor shall notify the Director of Planning. Archaeological features include artifacts of 14 stone, shell, bone, or other natural materials. Association with artifacts includes hearths; 15 house floors, and dumps. Historic artifacts potentially include all by-products of human 16 land use greater than 50 years of age. Human burials, if encountered, require the 17 notification of the County Coroner'in addition to the monitoring archaeologist. The City 18 shall consult with qualified cultural resource specialist to evaluate the find. If the suspected 19 remains are determinedito be potentially significant, all work in the vicinity shall be halted 20 until mitigation measures are incorporated into the design, or the removal of the resource 21 has been accomplished in accordance with recommendations by the archaeologist. The 22 applicant shall comply'with all mitigation recommendations of the archaeologist prior to iit-) commencing work in the vicinity of the archaeological find. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with consulting a cultural resource specialist and with 2 implementation of mitigation measures. 26 27 44. The applicant shall'be required to obtain all,required permits from responsible agencies 28 and provide proof of compliance to the City prior to issuance of grading or building 29 permits or approval of improvement plans. 30 31 45. The applicant shall incorporate all applicable code provisions and required mitigation 32 measures and conditions into the design and improvement plans and specifications for the 33 - project. 34 35 46. The applicant shall notify all employees, contractors, and agents involved in the project 36 implementation of the mitigation measures and conditions applicable to the project and 37 shall ensure compliance with such measures and conditions. Applicant shall notify all 38 assigns and transfers of the same. 39 40 47. The applicant shall designate a project, manager with authority to implement all 41 mitigation.measures and conditions of approval and provide name, address, and phone 42 numbers to the City prior to issuance of any grading permits,and signed by the contractor 43 responsible for construction. 44 45 48, Mitigation measures required during construction shall be listed as conditions on the • building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for construction. 48 From the Bicycle Advisory Committee: 49 49. A total of five covered bicycle parking places shall be provided throughout the 50 development. 15 • 1 2 50. One shower and five clothes lockers shall be provided for employees' use. • 3 4 51. Exterior seating at benches/tables for a minimum of 10 persons shall ,be provided 5 (calculated at twice the amount of required bicycle parking). This seating shall also serve as 6 an outdoor eating space for employees. 7 8 52. The owners/lessees shall provide a simple one-page document to the City naming a 9 designated `transportation coordinator" and describing specific incentives for employees 10 and customers to walklbicycle to the facility thereby encouraging alternatives to driving 11 cars to this facility. Examples include lending bicycles for short errands,monetary or other 12 rewards for not driving, etc. This documentation shall be received by the City prior to 13 issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 14 15 53. The development shall have on-site facilities for food storage, preparation and eating . 16 accessible to all employees of all buildings. 17 18 54. Under no circumstances should any pesticide/herbicide be applied. in areas used by 19 pedestrians/bicyclists anywhere in this project or the surrounding area without appropriate 20 signage. 21 22 55. This project shall utilize Best Management Practices regarding pesticide/herbicide use and 23 fully commit to Integrated Pest Management techniques for the protection of bicyclists and 24 pedestrians: • 25 • 26 From the Engineering Department: 27 56. A 10-foot wide right-of-way dedication to the City of Petaluma is required for the 100-foot 28 long.portion of parcel street frontage. 29 30 57. An executed private storm drain easement grant deed shall be obtained from the adjacent 31 existing Petaluma Ecumenical Project (PEP) development (APN 007-570-029) located 32 southeasterly of the proposed project. Note: A letter of intent dated 12/21100 to enter offer 33 the above-mentioned easement from PEP to the Salvation Army is on file with the City of 34 Petaluma Community Development Department. 35 36 53. Hydrology calculations for the proposed and existing storm drain system shall be submitted 37 to the Engineering. Section for review. Additionally, the calculations should indicate that 38 the existing storm drain facilities located on the PEP project are hydraulically capable of 39 handling the increase in peak storm water runoff based,on the proposed site development. 40 Sonoma County Water Agency standards should be used to perform•the analysis. 41 42 59. All portions of broken, cracked or otherwise damaged sidewalk or driveway approaches 43 located along the entire parcel frontage shall be replaced. 44 45 60. An excavation permit is required for all work within the public right-of-way 'including 46 sidewalks, driveway approaches, water supply and sewerage installations, etc. • 47 48 61. All existing subsurface wastewater disposal systems and septic tanks, if any shall be 49 removed per County of Sonoma Department of Environmental Health standards. 16 '. 1 . /111-62. All work within the public right-of-way shall conform to the City of Petaluma latest W standards, codes;..policies, etc. 4 5 63. Lotto'lot surface drainage and concentrated drainage cif public sidewalks shall notoccur. 6 7 From the Water Department: . 8 64. The contractor shall submit GPM requirements needed for water connections. The project 9 will require a minimum of 1"'service for domestic and minimum 1°' service for irrigation. 10 11 From the Fire Marshal: (To avoid,requests for subsequent submittals, please show or note all Fire 12 Department requirements on plans submitted for building pen-nit.) 13 14 CHILDCARE BUILDING: 15 65. The building shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the 16 Uniform Fire Code and.shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, which will 17 notify the Fire Department in the event of water flow. In addition, a local alarm shall be 18 provided on the exterior and interior of the building. 19 20 66. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor that will notify the fire 21 department in the event of an alarm. 22 • 67. This facility requires an annual Fire Department peuuit for a commercial childcare facility. The permit fee is $60.00 per year and is due prior to occupancy approval and/or operation. 25 26 68. This facility shall meet the requirements in the 1998 California Uniform Fire Code Article 27 10 and in FPA 72. 28 29 NEW CHAPEL AND EXISTING CHURCH: 30 69. Provide a KNOX BOX for Fire Department aecess. KNOX BOX shall contain keys or 31 access codes to buildings. 32 33 70. All curtains, drapes, hangings or other decorative material, shall..be flame retardant or 34 treated with an approved fire retardant chemical by a licensed State Fire Marshal 35 Applicator. 36 37 71. This business requires an annual Fire Department permit for Places, of Assembly of less 38 than 300. The permit fee of$60.00 is due prior to occupancy approval and/or operation. 39 40 72. The buildings shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the 41 Uniform.Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, which will 42 notify the Fie Department in the event of water flow. In addition, a local alarm shall be 43 provided on the:exterior and interior of the building. 44 • 73. A permit is required from the Fire marshal for the installation or alteration of a fire sprinkler system prior to the commencement of work. A minimum of two sets of plans with 47 calculations is required to be submitted for review and approval. 48 17 1 74. Contractors installing underground fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and submit 2 two sets of plans for approval prior to commencing work. A`hydrostatic test of 200 psi for 3 • two hours is required prior to backfill. All joints shall be visible at time of inspection. 4 Underground installations shall be flushed to Fire Department satisfaction prior to 5 connection to overhead. NOTE: Civil utility plans and/or other plans approved, or not, will 6 not be accepted in lieu of the above requirement. 7 8 75. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma City Water Department approval prior"to charging onsite 9 underground water mains. 10 11 76. All contracts shall have a City business license and a workers' compensation certificate on 12 file with the Fire Marshal's office. 13 14 77. Provide an approved automatic fire extinguishing:system to protect all cooking equipment. 15 . 16 78. Fixed fire extinguishing systems shall be installed by a licensed contractor. Contractor shall 17 obtain the required permit from, and submit two sets of plans for review by, the Fire 18 Marshal. Systems are subject to testing and inspection by the Fire Marshal's office prior to 19 acceptance. 20 21 79. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor, which will notify the Fire 22 Department in the event of an alarm. 23 24 80. All required fire lanes, in which no parking is allowed, shall be designated by painting 25 .curbs red. Where no curbs exist, signs approved by the Fire Marshal•shall be installed. 26 27 81. No combustible construction above the foundation is allowed unless an approved asphalt. 28 surfaced road is provided to within 150 feet of the fiuthest point of a stnicttire and the fire 29 hydrants have been tested, flushed, and are in service. 30 31 82. Install fire hydrants every 300 lineal feet. No structure or Fire Department sprinkler 32 connection shall be in excess of 150 feet froth a fire:hydrant. 33 34 SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING: 35 83. The building shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required by the 36 Uniform Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, which 37 will notify the Fire,Department in the event of water flow: In addition, a local alarm shall 38 be provided on the exterior and interior of the building. 39 40 84. Contractors installing underground fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and submit . • 41 two sets of plans for approval prior to commencing work. A hydrostatic test of 200 psi for 42 two hours is required prior to backfill. All joints shall be visible at time of inspection: 43 Underground installations shall be flushed to Fire Department 'satisfaction prior to 44 connection to overhead. NOTE: Civil utility plans,and/or other plans approved, or not,will 45 not be accepted in lieu of the above requirement. 46 47 85. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma City Water Department approval prior to charging onsite 48 underground water mains. 49 18 1. 86. All contracts shall have a City business license and a workers' compensation certificate on file with the Fire Marshal's office. 4 87. Fire alarm system shall he connected to a central station monitor that will notify the Fire 5 Department!in the event of an alarm. 6 7 88. This plan has been reviewed with the information supplied; subsequent plan submittal for 8 review may be subject to additional requirements as plans are revised. 9 10 From the Transit Coordinator; 11 89. A,transit stop sign-(provided by the City), pole and bench pet the attached specifications 12 shall be installed at the existing bus stop. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 • 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 • 33 • 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 47 43 • 44 47 48 Revised 3/27/01 19 -Commercial / Industrial Building Permit Application • Site and Grading Plan Checklist City of Petaluma Community Development Department Engineering Section The following list ofitems.represents Engineering Section requirements for any siteplan;;gfading plan, etc accompanying a commercial or industrial building/grading permit application,to the Building Department. Grading only, underground utilities only or a combination of both can be submitted prior to building permits associated with a structure but the following information will be required regardless of the type of permit application. Any•improvement plans for off-site work' within the public right of way,required with a commercial`or industrial project shall be designed in accordance with the latest"Improvement Plan Preparation Checklist" available from the Engineering Section. 1. Existing topography on City of Petaluma datum and reference source (Including adjacent parcels and street frontages) 2. Building pad elevation(s) 3. Finished floor'elevation(s) 4. Proposed site grading/finished•spot grade elevations and finished contours 5. Finished surfaces (concrete, asphalt concrete, landscaped;areas, etc.) 6. Surface drainage patterns (including,adjacent parcels and•street frontages); • 7.'Finished surface•slopes and/or retaining walls • 8. Existing or new frontage improvements not associated with improvement plans (curb,,gutter, sidewalk, fire.hydrants, streetiliahts, catch basins, etc.) 9. Driveway aprons, travel ways and parking facilities 10. Sanitary sewer system (including type, slope and size of pipes and connection points) 11. Domestic and:fire protection water system (including type and size of services, meters, double:check valve assemblies, etc. Refer to the City of Petaluma water system design and construction standards 800 series) — 12. Storm drain system (including type and size of pipes and discharge locations) 13. Boundary information including,property line bearings and distances (reference source of boundary information shown). .14. Dimensions from property lines to existing and proposed structures 15. Existing and proposed easements 16, North arrow/written and bar scale 17. Erosion and sediment control plan. Storm water pollution prevention plan if required • The following notes shall be shown on all plans: 1. All workwithin,the public right of way requires an excavation permit. • • • CIT OF PETALUMA, CALIF( .;NIA • MEMORANDUM City Attorney's Office,11 English Sheer,Pera(uma, CA 94952 (707)3778-4362' ,Fax(WV 778-OC20 E-mail:ateami 4C,•.petalumacaus DATE: March 12,2001 TO: Planning Commission • FROM: Richard Rudnansky • SUBJECT: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit You have asked for amopinionon;three separate,issues. First, whether the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons.Act of 2000 ("RLUIPA") applies to the childcare, counseling and food distribution elements of the project. Secondly,you have asked whether the proposed storage space,in the Social Services building is allowed under the applicable zoning. Third, you have asked whether a claimedPloss of property values must be studied in connection with the City's initial study CEQA,document: • L RLUIPA • You have asked whetherthe childcare; counseling and food distribution.elements (i.e., "elements") of the prOject are.subject.to+RLUIPA: You have advised that the Commission may wish to consider imposing restrictions on these.elements. It is my understanding that the Salvation Army has not asserted any rights under-RLUIPA and is prepared'to accept conditions. Whether RLUIPA applies will depend impart on whether the applicant asserts its rights'under the ' statute. Therefore, there:does;not appear to be a RLUIPA issue. However, this memo will provide a general discussion ofRLUIPA. RLUIPA applies where;the•governmentsubstantially burdens the religious exercise of a person covered by the act. Whether RLUIPA will in fact be applicable in this instance depends on several factors. As a.threshold matter, applicability depends on whether'offering'these+services constitutes "religious exercise,"within,the meaning ofRLUIPA. Since RLUIPA is new, we have little guidance with respect to its interpretation. • Planning Commission . Re: Salvation Army Conontonal Use Permit March 12, 2001 Page 2 • Section°;8(7)ofRLUIPA defines religious exercise as follows. "RELIGIOUS EXERCISE (A)IN GENERAL-The term 'religious exercise includes any exercise of religion, whether ornot compelled`by, or central to, a system of,religious belief (B)RULE- The use, building,,or conversion of real propertyfor the purpose of religious.exercise shall be,considered to be religious exercise of the person or entity that uses,or intends to use the property for purpose." The Supreme Court has.recognized that assessing whether an asserted claiimthat a particular activity is:a form of"religious exercise" will be very-difficult, if not_impossible, to dispute: Therefhas.been!so-me attempt toi distinguish between "sincere"religious beliefs imthis regard, and those that are not sincere. But, practically speaking,'if'the Salvation Army asserts that providing childcare is part of its religious mission,the City, if it intends to do so, should not place greathopes in the success of an effort to dispute that-assertion. Assuming the or each of them fall within the ambit of"religious exercise," whether RLUIPA,applies'depends thereafter upon whether the Salvation Army,in'fact:claims that a condition of approval imposed on the project will°:substantially burden that religiously.motivated • activity. The RLUIPA places the onus on the religious claitnant.to establish the existence of the substantial burden on its religious activity. However,if the Salvation Army makes such a claim, the Commission has.one of several options; 1) The Commission could accede to the objection of the applicant, and simply not impose the limitationin question In that case, RLUWAwill no longer be an issue; 2),The Commission's second option is to modify or replace the condition of approval in question with a condition that:is less onerous, and 3) Assuming that,no acceptable alternative appears to be available, the Commission's may go forward an&impose the condition of approval:over the objection of the applicant, In this latter situation, the Commission should pay careful attention to making findings, supported by evidence in the record of the;hearing, to support the imposition of the contested condition. Therefore, if the Salvation.Army asserts rights under RLUIPA, then in addition to the finding s.required by the City's CUP provisions, thelCommtssion.should, if supported by evidence, make findings: (1) That the proposed condition of approval will not place a substantial burden • on the applicant. • • Planning Commission • Re: Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit March 12, 2001 Page 3 . . (2) That limiting the operation of the project will further a compelling interest of the City. • (3) That any conditions imposed would be the least restrictive means available to protect the identified 'compelling interest. 2 Storage Use • You have asked whether the proposed 2,300 sq.'feet of storage,area—to'be used for storing supplies for emergency disaster relief, palletized food supplies distribution to needy families, and for parking a mobile food canteen van—is allowed under the applicable zoning category, which conditionally permits "educational, religious,,cultural, or public services" uses: This category specifically excludes storage, warehousing, and similar uses. Therefore, it appears - that the proposed use is allowed'.under the City's Zoning Ordinance. Zoning uses are typically categorized according to their primary use Such categories assume and permit a variety of ancillary and related uses Thus,for example, single family home owners who store boxes of old photographs in their garage will;:notbe considered in violation of the prohibition against storage uses;in R-I districts, because storing old photos is considered ancillary to the single family use Likewise, in the,.present;instance, storage,of food items, disaster relief supplies and vehicles, and the like, appear to•be incidental or ancillary to the Salvation Army's primary use of the property for educational, religious, cultural, and other quasi. public purposes. Therefore,.the project appears to be consistent:with the applicable zoning category. 3. Scope of Initial Study You have asked whether the alleged loss of property values'that may result from approval of the project must be considered'in the preparation of the initial;study required by the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")'. From the information you have provided thus far, we - think the answer is no. "CEQA and its implementing guidelines make it clear that social and economic effects are not to be considered a significant environmental effect and need be considered only to the extent they are relevant to an anticipated physical.change in the environment or, on the basis of substantial evidence, are reasonably likely to result in physical change to the environment." Economic and social change, as such, may not be regarded as a significant change in the environment but may be considered if they are associated with a physical change. • Because the purpose of an initial study is to determine whether a project might have a significant effect on the environment, it is limited to identifying direct physical impacts on the • Planning Commission Re: Salvation Army Corn..tonal Use Permit March 12, 2001 Page 4 • environment; or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical impacts. Generally speaking,,then; if there is substantial evidence that a project's social or economic impacts may lead to reasonably foreseeable and significant changes in'the physical environment, then such impacts should be identified in the initial study. Again,however, only identified physical changes in,the environment - may considered.potehtially significant'impacts under CEQA. . It is also important to bear in mindahat speculation and unsubstantiated opinion do not constitute substantial evidence. Thus, the mere assertion of possible loss of property values resulting from the project, in addition to being unrelated to a physical impact, may fail to rise to the;level,ofsubstantialsevidence to support a fair argument that the project might result in a physical impact on the environment. . In addition typically it is only when regulations imposed deprive the property owner,ofall viable economic,use of his property that there will be a "taking" under the Constitution.:In this project it does not appear that there exists this potential and, in my opinion, the issue of devaluationtshould not from a legal point of view drive your decisions. 4. Other Concerns: I am advised.that the Salvation Army has not raised objections to and apparently is prepared to'acceptthe conditions. On the other hand I.am also advised that there',is some;concern that either the Salvation Army would challenge the conditions or that once the CUP is'issued it will notcomply with the conditions. Under the typical scenario, if the Salvation Army does not agree with any conditions imposed it would berequired to file"an appeal to the City Council for its consideration before proceeding to;litigation. Certainly if the Salvation Army has any disagreement with any of the conditions and chooses to appeal to the City Council, the City will know in the near future: If the Salvation Army chooses to accept the benefits of the CUP the usual result`in;any later challenge is a waiver of the right to challenge. _ RRR/taz cc: Fred Stouder Betsi Lewitter • IaWPnlanywrlPETALUMANi oWlemos1Salvanon Army CUP•PiiSing06.wpd Petaluma Index SR-01#32 • ____--- • iez_ez -b "eedare6 Pe. : Pata /tan7' gadnt,7 i itha ' fie4,0' za 0; 01 4'friiir-a04,4- vii i 4, soW4 " eild/4 a t If , lacideifrie-zeeK a, d97,7' - - Le,(420‘, 1 . / :fil'adeiagiviw 1 pitzd xacza_ nm:s. /29/aioew ivy& ,„ 44 • se 7 7 a /9 bawdfie 5 'e a eiS i'ael 4 Aaot /Ail '61 t I rit,/a/ -WO el'otAtt, 901/e;171‘9 Andaleill AS, '?ECEIVEL 0 MAR L g 2001 ,vmiiNii(1)EVELOPMENT OEP ARTMENT ettavAnlet 3- 4 ,41-0-4 ce7, ao-e 1 eta'"si 41-frat 1 _ Redwood Empire Appraisal P.O. Box 2850 Petaluma, California94953 • Phone (707) 763-2772 Dr . Dick Bush March 14 , 2001 716 Park Lane Petaluma, CA 94,954 • Re : Market value impact on residence • • Dear Dr . Bush : Per your request,, I have , provided you with' my opinion on the impact of the proposed Salvation Army • expansion project . It, is my understanding that the proposed expansion will consist of a new Chapel , a community hall , social services center and day care facility. The social services center would provide housing coun- seling, tutoring. 'for students , and other programs, including grocery distribution . The day care facility would be open from 6 a .m. to 10 p . m . and would assist up to 6`0 children . It is my opinion that this expansion would negatively' impact our clients property Value . The social services center .appears to have the most impact on the subject property due to the lessened • privacy and increased noise, by additional vehicles , delivery trucks and foot traffic . The day care facility would create similar ' distractions to the privacy and enjoyment of the site . The proposed closure time of the facility at 10 p . m. extends into hours that typical neighbor- hood noise has lessened, thus, being a moderate distraction : A earlier closure hour would result in less overall impact to the neighborhood. Given the scenario mentioned above, it is my opinion that the property value of the subject property would decline by as much as 15-200 . If there are any further questions , please do not hesitate to contact me . • Sincerely, • Don Angotti , R . E . Appraiser/Owner • ' Redwood Empire Appraisal • File : Bush. l.tr Redwood Empire Appraisal P.O. Box 2850 pern uma, California 94953 Phone (707)763-2772 Dr. Dick Bush, 'March 14 , 2001 716 Park Lane Petaluma, CA 94954 Re : Market value impact 'on residence Dear Dr . Bush : Per your request , I have provided you with, my opinion on the impact of the proposed Salvation Army expansion project . It is my understanding that the proposed expansion. will consist of a new chapel , a community hall , social services center and day care facility . The social serv=ices center would.:provide housing coun- seling, tutoring - for students , and other programs , including grocery distribution. The day care facility would be open from 6 a . m. to 10 p .m . and would assist up to '60 children . • It is my opinion that this expansion would negatively impact our clients property' Value . The social services' center appears to aye the most impact on the, subject property due to the lessened tivacy and increased noise, by additional. vehicles , delivery trucks and foot traffic . The day care facility would create similar distractions to the privacy and enjoyment; of the site . The proposed closure time of the facility at 10 p,.m. extends into hours that typical neighbor- hood noise has lessened, thus , being a moderate distraction . A earlier closure hour would result in less, overall impact to the neighborhood. Given the scenario mentioned above, it is my opinion that the property value of the subject property woulddecline by as much as 15 -200 . If there are any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact. me . ©1 Sincerely, �tN N,' At'� Don Angotti , R . E . Appraiser/Owner eia, 'Redwood Empire Appraisal File : Bush . ltr c4a oa% AfrA, , cq 9776' 78712-0363 11 -fa 1 _ • 4/&447. rfin 5-4 r - )41216,77- 777 .2; eWg/ 5/72 NO gridicce-27)./0/M5 Spy/95e-1,z) &46/d;a/ROW 7 " I 74 r *Pet<<e 610 wiz: %we 17/ • fr ovey (evj t bt-11 79-eigitn /gLi;'/°°: b e077-f. uP Alper-i5 6E pi/An t; / t_. / c),A6c5c/r Ab-T- /r\ 72 (d(g111 ) c` 7\ • 14,d " 'Pad/ p •' tPc/ /rod 7 {/ i r ncliCr r rte, rrrrrr g`rr ertd2i6'L- %/ KF7e -r ere 77,Z)) (//:51S2/07±a/ &W d r �P � rr/q 6/oi rt&! 69 • * r ./' Aye ni #Ci d w S/9/ are/6 PPG a fro-tree / c! GGrr�6r 07 4dize I ef101y fir • . . A w••.• rq•••!" -,•^;C:raThtr.T.'"•.-‘44';(75'terr,'"C1CC. ti1;74915.7.04:7:ifttit.7,11:C4 1. • '9 , .!,-.14.:,K.,-2,4,;;i7!!. .- ;. 1,11_1"..,i,ti:".3'1.1'440::: 4,41:1L11.BLLS11;,',,peff..,4'..INCfr. ,1 . (/ / i.---- fn.FAISHEV:05§METICM014 L:/c./:.4/ /'(.;;;/), •<;;_.,.- . • • 4:van&FUTURETDEN ITSTRYttfA 7/ i (2 -SOWcil.::._.:''...:2,_it'l-F24.-t.,-,,,,...,:-,Ecvmh,,,,,,,,,,,,. ',,E;n416,FtRoFEssteNA ORAii;:..,, ,_ i):?,surrE-201,NN.,q,.i.A.Ai:astrit.E.,: / 7) ,I17. • • ''' i , /._,,,,o /7.. p. : 74 ,-„) , ,,„,4,:i„,,, 'ire1PETALUIVIA.k.C:k94954E5L--V'7,-+., 7' ' / 1.1 ._ 7 4 .1"2:.. ..1. .‘14;413.1, , • ‘rrc it 1St(707)163;26821.,4rXtlei!le-hc,:t4r of. / . 7 1 1, .+:7 k /hi/ . ./' 6) :":',148r001:31.07d1611-4.‘",'1;11:;-'11fr'f14:?-"t:," e i k A711,11 /1.•• l'''1-i• / intifi.,/ ,,,,Acie.,,,Le; /..(0,,,,, „/"..„4,e 1-•/•••i/ ;.irt:,(707):16.3;-4998:-:FAXINOttr,--t4t; / 1;7 :,) 4,3:$1,1;!-Atre,Ni..ttlit---Ktrgy,.."<tfr.wd..-;4:4- A tf, Vii.e7. '21'114 71/27/ ''Ati 1.711/17701 /I pliirtnt,/4/ (/L. 47.1p7a/t, -.4,- , g,,., , i. ' ,,,,) (,(A,,..1... /. ,,1 ./..„. , ,, / t= i, ,, -- & • , „._/- ,,,,, • '-) 1 Vert 11/1/7/ i41 1,,I(IWI' 414,67/Pni4-. ,.11A,1-,2927-e/2, I ,, • // ! 1 ( 1 ,. f. , . v.„, v ) 4 . A2 1,1/6?/,,,,. 1 ---,0-49--/.2/11,.2 , I/ . . 0 • ( /.. • "J.-(-7-r 0 1 /4 A ,, _4. ....„--), . 7 , / ,,1 ,,, ,,, ,) f„,..,„,i .4 'y A/1/1 AA1 c: 4 .(Y d-4 L-/et, ,, M A 29.V H,-• C 'Y'■ C, '.te-L! I,vi,I fit 1,-;l t 1,4,10.11 I I lie 7/e/117 117/14_45: ' i':...;-1;kr 1 L.%,"' //a- / i , 9 „a, ■ • ,-, / ,---) , - /,:. J (-1 977e1 "'9.- •ih? //1‘;‘) ‘/I 9 '. )2 ;{67#77719 177 71:1/l• (-'2/Al 17/ Il ill 0 L 1 z•'; :::'i/'": .•1 if;;1/, ./.if Lt.?, , _!../I ,.//././. / •,'.y/. i ,,,, , /4_,./„ L.,1., i . • I/ -.1 7,/,/ nit / . /T •4 / /)'' , /14/ I /11/10" /I ;,,e66 /4,74/774 (-(/ - fic-t? i '-' ii - I/ , j j . I i - -...---, ,2:1 i /11' /.4.7 6z-1 e e,„tc LA:oL.... ,, ---uti Puu'' ' • r ---: t--.c' / ,,-- (-1-1-''' • . c • .,) , . --0-1--Cr' -.? 4 /L.° -A , . / 6- 4-4). i " • • \ „ , , . ii- (, - - -- ._., 1. , ,--„izzip.,?,- L • . . ii , 7 , ( i 72(. )N,/, b 7 -/ I 4, ey,,,,,-- O./ r .,,. ... ;-6,_ ,,,,,.., -,.. . , ,...,:2_,-(: ,%_;',„,,_) .A.A- ,- •-ti.);,./ /10 • - ,i 7,, , ) (j i .„--- ..-/t. Ar /3 . J ( i • V • /4r- 4/47 of rm -- s/ILA-7/(2' AR/77y (4) -ii7CPCg// g/vo) — • ay • diri,12igLAV KF76Yi'S ez- y "yid 0,,[272.n729/7 omyri: /9-7/7 /p/-7 m/ • Pp 90 fl /11(7 rfig */9/- 15Ter6 fr ./7-/Vg-1 z:eh /17S er/*- i0c- vTg6 00 7° (- 13 .,vtio • nu i u rant ! : O2 7077637119 REDWOOD EMPIRE APPRA PAGE 01 Alel4m /Coy _70-7 oy SQ; Wc.,PO / 5&22 - C7U‘eiy2igLiiyo O /e toeY 9fy y no/ ci5,(? i aV - 99y cafe /t r 42,E u77 7- �1 * yv/ M / y c.. l/l�i/ cGw-c ' L c� i S Si ti (cam•. 't `--c U � Q, P 1, c (6-x 9 + chi ai as , j atea creme 4fa foto , ? P sc . QY �'� Redwood' Empire Appraisal l:O. Box 2850 • Pctaluma,:California 94953 - Phone-{707) 763-2772 Dr . Dick Bush March 14 , 2001 716 Park Lane Petaluma , CA 94954 Re : Market value . impact on residence Dear Dr . Bush: Per your request , I have provided you with my opinion on the impact of the proposed Salvation Army expansion project . It is my understanding that the proposed expansion will consist of a new chapel , a community .hall, social services center and day care facility. The social services center would provide housing coun- seling, tutoring "f'or students , and other programs , including grocery distribution .. The day care facility would be open from 6 a . m. to 10 p . m. and would assist up to 60 children . It is my opinion that this expansion would negatively' impact our clients property value . The social services center appears to Ihave the most impact on the subject property due to the lessened I privacy and increased noise , by additional vehicles , delivery trucks and foot traffic . ' . The day care facility would create similar distractions to the privacy and enjoyment of the site . The proposed closure time of the facility at 10 p .m. .extends into hours that typical neighbor- hood noise has lessened, thus, being a moderate distraction . A earlier closure hour would result in less overall impact to the neighborhood. Given the scenario mentioned above, it is my opinion that the property value of the subject property would decline by as much as 15 -20% . If there are any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me . Sincerely, . ^„(v„_„`'4 . Don Angotti., R.E . Appraiser/Owner ' Redwood Empire Appraisal 0 File : Bush,. itr . 0 er - [-Yk--- av elinpL f aril7216?)--1/41/0 C'7fr'/ (-5 , , / _ . 7060 eatri0 fly 5a / i • • • * r,d/ f' eii/e . ey.d "' c/;2/I 4Ag n 0 777. : gi;./P/- S7716 ,wv iv 1 ciN 0\:c v /-7 Y --- j S ey / riCy,c \e‘ 77/75 F---/icic-(rY. - .ckw 41/4 i aegew7-q- --4-557/3iLY --5-O676 ' 1, # : 4 if ,j\J . - g /is 2 <•j ,/ - . • •P / /d, 1 / I,/Pa, Ai, le tieff ylQiia, - e ,/, a ‘e r a . de (hof . r ? Sent By: WESTGATE REALTY; 7077699591 ; Feb-9-01 11-:37AM; Page 1 /1 • �igM,/}Trl Alg07 M'LliCr -•501 ?c90 // g&-?) ())i/WIeL-iN M ��y 191 �h5, /Atra/ $45/ d/9 / T� /Pd/ MA3 690 7-(2 clegeike vz:1 Are n rei a 1577776 vRAGee 0 , - ccro Kew uvol)c — va ) 41( Q/a qadfrd-r() • G 1/ , \p ,7L. }t ok • IC) zwAce • Redwood Empire Appraisal P.O. Box 2850 Petaluma, California 94953 Phone(707)763-2772 . • Dr . Dick 'Bush Mareh 14 , 2001 716 Park Lane Petaluma, CA 94954 Re : Market value impact on residence Dear Dr. Bush: Per your request, I have provided you with my , opinion on the impact of the proposed Salvation Army .expansion project , It is my understanding that the proposed expansion will consist of a new chapel, a community hall., social services center and day care facility.. The social services center would provide housing coun- seling.,. tutoring for students, -and other programs, i ncluding grocery' distribution . The day care, facility would be open from. 6 a..m. to 10 p.m. and would assist up to 60 children. It is my opinion that this expansion would negatively impact our clients property value . The social services center appears to have the most impact on the subject property due to the lessened privacy and increased noise, by additional vehicles, delivery• trucks and foot traffic . - • The day care lability would create similar distractions to the privacy and enjoyment of the site . The proposed closure time of the facility at 10 p .m. extends into hours that typical neighbor- hood noise has lessened, thus, .being a moderate. distraction. A earlier closure hour would result in less overall impact to the neighborhood. Given the scenario mentioned above, it is my opinion that the property value of the subject. property would decline by as much as 15-20% . If there are any further que§tions, please do not hesitate to contact me . Sincerely, . Don Angctti, R. E . Appraiser/Owner tt: Red wgocQS1 A Redwood Empire Appraisal ljµe� �� Irl, lots U$.0 • File : Bush. ltr teu� or_vat. ;Q?*e'c ( 'M OS Iq V1eS14rn+1taQ, Litet); . • Re_ dwood. Empire Appraisal . P.O. Box 2850 e a Petaluma, California 94953 PhoneP07) 763-2772 • Dr. Dick Bush March ?],a , 2001 '716 Park Lane ,Petaluma , CA 94954 Re : Market value impact on residence . Dear Dr . Bush : Per your request , I have provided you with my opinion on the impact of the proposed Salvation Army expansion project . It is my understanding that the proposed expansion will consist of a new chapel , a community hall,, social services center and day care facility. The social services center would _provide housing coun- seling, tutoring for students, and other programs , including ' grocery distribution . The day care facility would be open from 6 a . m . to 10 p . m . and would assist up to 60 children . It is my opinion that this, expansion would negatively' impact our clients property value. 'The . social services center appears to have the most impact on the subject property due to the lessened �r_vacy and increased noise, by additional vehicles , delivery t-r'ucks and foot traffic . . The day care facility would create similar distractions to the privacy and enjoyment of the site . The proposed closure time of the facility at 10 p . m.. extends into hours that typical neighbor- hood noise has lessened, thus , being a moderate. distraction . A earlier closure .hour, would result in less overall impact to the neighborhood . Given the scenario mentioned above, it is my opinion that the property value of the subject property would decline by as much as 15 -20% . If there are any further questions , please do not hesitate to contact me . Sincerely,• C)F- q ' . t : L % , %• lit • �hJ:,,r/s Don Angotti , P . E . Appraiser/Owner (, ,. .�ILG1--2 G.,, ` ^ ' Redwood Empire Appraisal - �„ i. File : Bush. ltr ,,- t✓ Q `3' , �® ` 1 11l Acoustics • Air QuaIit `y 35/%/ March 7, 2001 MAJO C R q 'C,F IV E AR 1 9 2001 FtENT )EPHBNNEN'i i Mr. Wayne Miller, AIA 7 i LIPH&MILER,tEx, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING ry u r I '° 44 °9 °dpi One sodega Avenue Petaluma, CA 94952 ( 7 76. — 4416) Via Fax: (707)763-7899.(4pages) RI: Response to Comments- Acoustics and Noise • Salvation Army Conditional Use-Permit Dear Mr. Miller, Following are Illingworth&Rodkin,Jnc: (I&R)'e response to:the comments by the.City of Petaluma Staff and Neighbors pertaining to noise issues surrounding theSalvation Army Conditional Use Permit Neighborhood Comments,: We would ask that their sound.engineer,.11lingworth &'Rodkrn;direct another study of the site to let us know what measures should betaken by the Salvation Army to address our concerns in regard to the transmission of sounds. Questions which came up in regard to the type and height of the sound walls constructed might be better addressed by the sound engineers. (I) We would like measurements of ambient noise to be made on our side of the fence, not just the Salvation Army's side. Response: The-noise meter used for the measurements was..placed in the branches of an redwood tree at an elevation:higher than the existing properly line fence, eliminating any noise shielding which might result for the wall... Based of this, the`absence ofany existing noise source on • • 505 Petaluma Blvd. South Tel(707) 766-7700 IllroOiliingworthmdkin.ccm • Pe eJu m9, C4 94952 Fax(707) 766-7790 www.11llnaworthrodkln.com • • Response to Comments , Acoustics and Noise • Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit March 7;.2001,Page 2 the,Salvation Army side of the fence, and:that•the primary existing noise sources effecting the site are produced by area roadway traffic(which is partially shielded by residential structures before reaching the rear yards) the`ambient.noise-measured on the;neighbors side of the fence Would be essentially the identical to those made on the Salvation Army side of the property line.. If there is any change in noise levels between those measured-on Salvation Army's side and a neighbor's side of the property line fence we would expect higher overall noise;levels on the.residents side due to the closer proximity to the roadway and.typical residential noise(opening and closing,of doors, voices, etc.). Therefore we do not feel that ambient noise measurements made on the residential side of the fence would provide any new•:information. (2) We want to know how anyone can predict the sounds of expected numbers and,ages of children at play without actually recording these sounds and projecting them from the proposed site and thennieasurrng them at the affected homes, both at;ground level and at the second Story level on Park Lane. Response: • To establish the noise level expected by to be produced.by children at play in;the,proposed play areas I&R utilized average and'maximum sound,level data obtained from noise • . • measurements conducted at similar child care facilities in the Bay Area These measurements were conducted at a defined distances from various numbers and,ages of children: The noise',levels expected fromathe maximum number of the,(typically) noisiest children (preschoolers)where calculated at the,nearest residences.using the measured sound levels adjusted for the number of children using airborne sound attenuation based a spherical sound loss of• ••dB per doubling_of the distance froth the source. The existing property line fence was a§sutned to provide arninimal sound'attenuation of 3 dBA. Though recording the sounds of children at play-and playing these sounds back through a loud speaker is possible, this would not give accurate,results since:a stationary•source cannot accurately reflect the sound produced by playing„children, who do not remain stationary during,play. We feel'•thatour method ofusing•noise measured at a distant point during play periods more accurately reflects'future noise levels from these•activities: • • • • • _ Response to Comments- Acoustics and Noise Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit March 7, 2001, Page 3 (3) At the meeting on'February I, we noted that an entire p layground had been excluded _ from the sound studies. - Response: I&R's analysis did not exclude+any play areas. Our analysis•was<based on a "worst case" scenario which assumed that a maximum number of 28 preschoolers were centering their play as close as 20 feet`from the northern and southern residential and/or PEP-property line fences. The Toddler play area,at the eastern edge of the property was also analyzed, but since theplay of toddlers is typically-quieter than that of preschoolers the noise levels - generated at this play area were determined to not exceed those of our"worst case" and therefore no separate mention of these areas was deemed necessary. (4) Also, we need toanww how loud grounds maintenance (leaf blowers, etc.)will be, and what hours they will be allowed. Response: . Based on the results of,previous noise measurement surveys which'I&R has conducted we have found that leaf blower noise ranged from 60 to 70 dBA at a distance of 150 feet. • Other ground maintenance equipment such as lawnmowers, etc. produce similar sound levels. Such equipment may be operated on the project site,in the parking lots at • distances of less than 150 feet from the nearest residential property line. The hours of grounds maintenance were not reported to I&R,.however a measure which may reduce any potential annoyance.due to their use would be to limit the use of ground maintenance equipment to mid-day hours (10 a.m. to 4 p.m.) only. (5) Several designs for the sound walls should be submitted for neighborhood review. Response: I&R can work with the project Architect, Lieb&Miller, do develop sound designs using various materials. City Comment: Please Supply the following as soon as possible: 2: Additional analysis from the acoustical engineer as to whether a masonry wall or a wood wall should be used to mitigate sound at was the opinion of one opponent that a masonry wall would exacerbate any noise problems because "sound bounces off of masonry walls and echoes about") Would the proposed 15 gallon trees adequately buffer sound or should larger trees be required? • .. Response to Comments Acoustics and Noise Salvation,Arrny Conditional Use Permit ' -'March.7, 2001 'Page:4 • . Responses. - , :E , 1. Sound,can bounce off both masonry and wood walls, however this effect only occurs • when the walls are closely spaced to one another or an acoustically building facade placed parallel to one another. Given the distance from the property line fence to the facade of the proposed buildings,we do not!expect that there will be a perceptible increase in sound levels at the residences due to.sound bouncing off of any typeiof•either a masonry or wood wall. 2. Trees or other types of foliage can be useful in"damping" higher frequency sound from the Salvation Army Facility,,'but they cannot act as a sou nd barrier; With respect to theisize,of trees used Smaller trees -may be more effective in providing a noise damping effect since their leafy foliage will be closer to the sources of noise (children's voices) than larger plants. . This concludes-I&R's response to the comments by the City of Petaluma Staff and Neighbors pertaining to noise issues surrounding the Salvation Army Conditional Use Permit. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions or concerns. • Sincerely, • red M. vinth, Assoc„ AIA . Senior Consultant • 17Fingworlh.& RodkiA,Inc. . I&R JoB 00-166 -. • • 'Mar:-09-01 02 :;4SP P. 04 uau uy. nuuucn pas vac.) itwee/as/y; u3/UY/U1 :4CPM'#139; Page 2/4 '• Mr. Wayne Miller—Architect - March 9,2001 Page 2 • the level on whichithe vehicle stands at a distance of 75 feet ahead(Reference DMV Code 24410). Qksezyatians: Assuming a worst case scenario: • Automobile is'100 feet from the fence line • Building is setback only 20'feet from fence linc • Fence height is8-feet The beam/glarr from the headlight will impact the,residence at 8' S"above ground level. This is well above the window'and eave height fora residential:bldg. As the Autornobile'approaches the fence.line sndlor'the residence is setback further than 20 feet from the fence ling,the headlight innuSibn height will icrease. References; I. Dept.of Motor Vehicles Code 24407 states: 'The headlamps and every light source in any • headlamp unit&halite located at a height of no more than 54-inches norJess than 22-inches (above pavement). • 2. Dept. of Motor Vehicle Code 24410 (a) states; "The headlamps shall be so aimed that when the vehicle is not loaded none of the high-intensity portionof the:light'shall at a distance of25 feet ahead project higher than a level of five inches below the level of the center of the lamp p r o m whichit coma,and brag case higher than 42 inches above:the.level on which the vehicle stands at a distance of•7S:faet,ahead. Sincerely, Winzler&Kelly Sliishirpoctor,PE Attachments. HeadlghtBeam Projection Matrix • Sketch 1 Sealed Diagram • nMV Codes 24400,24404, 24407, and 244107. • Mar-09-01 02 : 46F P .0= Um,•. i.q. nvnll.° rce r_c . ilu/UG1OUl.VI VOIV�/VI .YIrM,AloC, re.gY 3)4 v HEAD LIGHT BEAM PROJECTION MATRIX T.. _ __ I • Ew J= z LL c E J c c [ p C- 11 Y Q LL .F I, LL O ; LL 2 m 214. • 1 1 LX � LL 2 S2 N 2 ,e n 2 u- - LLW X ` ,� , 1 co J 2 b J 2 J J` . m t I ;a . ,:4 I6 Tip gds ° LL S ?,m it a I± la a ' • 10 a0 R i 20 20 ( 100 40 140 60 180 80 4 22.0- 20 . a..0 6 I 2 0 20 a.6 4C- I 10:0 EO 12 0 I "E0 140 30 40 6 20 20 0 73 40 8'7 ; CO ' 100 I 60 11.2 40 4/0 , 6. 2.0 20 7 0 t 40 8'D 1 60 ' 9 0 I 60 10.0 50 4 0 1 8 2.0 20 E 8 I 4C n e0 I' 6 4 e0 9.2 60 a0 R 2,0 20 67 40 • 73 60 80 b'D 87 70 4 0 ^8' 2.0' 20 8.6 40 : 7 1 60 7.7 80 • 9.3 ,. 80-. . 40 6' 2. 0 an 90- I 4.3 1 6.. 2 0 20 6.4 40- s2 60 7 3... . 80 I 72 10C I 4;0 I -8 2:0 27 • • 6.4 ' 40 /618 60 ' 7 2' 80 , 76'• 10 40 7 3A 20 30 AO 190 50 250 7• 90X3107 20 I 4 0 7 30 20 10 0 40' 13 e 1 BU 10 0 80 19 a , 30 1_*. 40 F. T 3:0 20 B0 40 i -11.0_1 60 130 80 16.0 1 40 4,0 7 Z_ &.p 2D 8'S AO 104 BD 115 I80, 13.0 / 60 . 4 0 . 7 J.0 20 Si 40, 0,4 60 10.6 I 80 11.8 ( 8.0 40 ( 9:0 80 10.0 I 80 11,6 10 40 ' 7 3.0 23 7.9 40 8:7 60 ... 96 80 104:,' 80 74,0 7 3.0 , 25 I-7..5- 40 jI 8 5 60 .9.3 80 . 15:6 ■ 90 i 40 7 30 I 20 T_77 40 8.3 60 90 80 97-..l • 100 I' 40 I .7 3.0. ` 20 1 7,6 40 I 62__ 80 8.8 ;80 94 . 10 4:0 8' 4.0 20 -- 0 ( 40 -24.0 I 32/0 ✓i0 40.I 30 . d 0 I 8 4 9_ 20 10 7 ' .40 , 13.3 I BO 20.0 80 24.0 7 , 20 I 40 8 4�0 20 12.0 40 16.0 6p i60 ti0 I 18.7 '• ' 40 4 0 r S: 4A 20 10 0 r40 ' 12.0 - ' B0 i4 a 8U 1 16.°. • I___-so 470. I 8:- 4.0 20 'B.® . 40 -112. 8o 128 80 ( 144:!1 770 d 0 I B aA 20 , ..913 0 10.3' t ,1 121 4 80 I 12 6,;; 60 410 6 • 40 20 1 9:0 40 10.0 eC '-11.0 { -- 60 • 12;0 _ BO 4.0 B 4.0. 20 '8.B 40 9.B 6D _ 10 7__1__80 11.8 100 46 I 9 40 20 ' 88 , -40' B.8' 60 104 B0 1r2 - 10 40 B 5Di 20 - I 390 30 49.0 - 19 0 40 9.0 80 20_ ;4 0 I 9 6A M 14.0 40 10:3 60 _24 0 '46 29:0 I. 30 At 1 9 50 20 12,3' 40 15.7 T67-7 . 76 B0' ! 22.3 40 4,0 I B 63. 20 1 '11 5 40 14.0 BO 16:6 80 19A' 60 ;4 0 I. -. 9 80 20 7 11.0 40 13.0, 80 -16,0 80 170 • Leo 40 9 + 50 20 0 40 12.3 80 140 , SA- I 157 V 70 40 - y T 5.0 20104 40 11.9, 60 133 1• 90 X147 AC 4U 9 50 j 20- t03 40 11,5 6C T 128 80 -Ii 4_0._ 90-T_ 4 U 1 -9 5 0 20 60 112 I TO 12 3 80 13 4 ice, 4 0 ' _B -- ,---10.1. 10 0 ._40 {CO I `60 I 12 0 . 80 1 13.0 i. SA 20 Formua1J89Q Tangent(Aloha) X1IY1,=(X1+X2VY2:2'(X1+X3913:=(X1+X4UN4 jX14X5)/Y5 _, ; OR Y2=q+({X1+X2'-Yt/X7 ,Etc . ? . . - SWdy,Petaluma.CA Wtinzler&_Kelly Protect No,00-2306-08 3'912001 • p ' ' ! III .. . ii {.. , , A.t- r .r!, , . r 1 0 I I . 1 I II I ? t r ( 11 ij_ H\' HHi ) ' !, I trI I , � � � i 14 I it i 4c.t t. Ii Ii 0. �l �• , , , ' I fg x U 1 I i �i� it 1\\ 1 l NI41' � I Sri I, 1' j. \ ,. )' 1 J•14 � \ I I ' I 1 i I A ( i 1 m„1 I . I aI I. • 1 I i s r F_� �'� ”- i ia, 1 I XP4 P.:)TL'ON :1(O 1u 90 'd ;;17911A7' ZO i0-60--+eW Mar-09-01 12 : 15P P . 02 Louise Leff Landscape Architecture • .' f Wayne Miller Lieb & Miller .One Bodega Avenue Pctaluma, CA '94952 March 8,2001 Dear Wayne, In response to the comments from•the community,and-suggestions from staff., 1 have made the followine changes'to-.the landscape plans for the Salvation Array. • The .Acertrees in',thc hack of the property have be n charged to Itn evergreen tree - ,arbutus marina, and sized at 24" boxes. • The Pistacla tree has been changed to an evergreen large shrub, that can be grown 3s'a tree - Dodonaca viscosa purpurca. I do not recommend increasing the size of this plant because it will grow faster and better if planted from a 1.5 gallon. • I drew circles to Indicate the size that the plants-will he when first put Mille ground, Even ahoutih ii tnay appear sparse when first planted, I do.not recommend planting any more densely because use the trees need the space to properly establish themselves. • . The evergreen hedge specified on the north property line wiil;:erow quickly, tall; andistav evergreent has a dense Form• and medium te.xtUre, i.believe-that it should not be interspersed with any.uther plantings. The single shrub row will allow for the Strongest and most he ilthy.crow�t!i tor the plums. Tidally, I believe that,a''.6' tall solid board fence will be sufficient to screen any headlights from neighboring properties. Please let fine:know if there is anything else that I can help--you with in regards to,this project. Cordial ly, Louise Leff Landscape Architect • • • Ak 304'Wehs(:crSt. • Pet.atutna, CA 9-4953 • (7,0.7,Y739 .015o • 1, 1C, # 33:8.6 Mar-09-01 02.: 45P P.03 ooUL uy. nwIia lea =414:.) Irvl:)eiOUltl, vdfJ 1w '.4urM;IFLI&; rage 1ta W7N ZLER&JCEL.LY • t a. H a U r i N Q Rai.00.2308.06.010 March 9,2001 Mr.Wayne Miller--Architect OneBodega Way Petaluma,CA 94952 • Subject: Salvation Army Petaluma Center,721 South McDowell Blvd.,Petaluma,CA Dear Mr. Miller: We have reviewed the comments received from the PlanhingDept.and specific concerns that the neighbors have raised. 8,e_ meliallentund.Neighbors=merit No. 16: We have developed a'Headlight Beam.Projection Matrix"that tabulates the Heating/It Intrusion Height (height at which the ltght/glare,from the headlights can be seen), for varying distances of the automobile from thetence line,different fence height and different setback distances for the residence from the fence lute. Reeommendatinns;; In general.our macareh andoalculadons indicate that anoniinal 6,,fee('high,solid(no opening) fence, located at the property line,-Would be adequate to prevent headlight glare from falling on a single,story residence thati6 set back about 40 feet from the property line. We further recommend that properties located in the direct path of travel and/or in the line of sight of the headlights,'be ei+i luated!with respect to the its orientation, location of windows, eave height,distance(setback)from the fence line and other applicable parameters,to determine if a higher fence or other solutions is warranted. Assumptions. 1. The fence is assumed co be solid(with no openings). 2. The automobile headlamp is 48inched above pavement;(Refesence DIM Code 2.4407) 3. The.automobile headlamps arc aimed such,that none of the high-intensity portion of the light shall,at a distance of 25 feet ahead,project higher than 5-inches below the level of the center of the lamp from which it conies,and in no case higher than 42•inches above • 495 Tavcvni Circk,Sans Rosa,CA 95401d696 •td 707.'52.3.1010 tax 707.527.8679 uaQw,ard-k.eom www.w-and-k.cum Ms Basil-twitter Page 2 March 12, 2001 • Way The conclusion of this analysis,is that the proposed Salvation Army Church and Child Day Care will have a less than significant impact on Sarkesian Drive and Marian Way. It is flutter concluded that the Salvation Army Church,and Child:Day Care would have a less than significant inspect on•Sarkezian Dive or Marian Way under the alternative site access configuration. A review of anticipated site activities was Made to evaluate the project's compliance with the City of Pealuma Zoning Ordinance:'Two peak'activity periods were identified that would result in fill utilization of the worship hall. The first of these would be on Saturdays when events such as weddings would likely occur and the day care would be operational. The second is Sundays when worship services would occur Of the two peak days the Saturday activities have the greatest poten ialparking demand and were selected to represent.a worst case scenario. The,required patting.supply based upon the City of Petaluma Zoning Ordinance is 38 spaces for the church giver a maximum seatingof'150 persons The day care parking requiremaitis one space for each of the eight employees. The:combined:perldng requirement is 46 spaces The site plan identifies 50parking:spaces providing,:a reserve of 4 parking spaces; Based linen this analysts the site will meet the on-site parking requirement. We hope this analysis adequately addresses these concerns.;Should additional clarification be necessary;please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely,' ' ofESSIp • Allan G.T i i- : " 30-04 6- 0-04 AoT/es s IRAFF)C av PETO26.119 r4re- \c# • OF-CA>. • • • Subj., _Salvation Army Date: 3/13/01 4:21:09 PM Pacific Standard Time Fr ' .wliabs©tjkm.com (Walter?Laabs) To t3 @cs.com ('Lewit3 @cs com') CC'gwhite @ci.petaluma.ca.us Cgwhite @ci.petaluma.ca.us, Betsi Reference Allan Tilton memo to you of March 12, 2001. A::copy was received today via fax. I concur with the analysis of impacts on.Sarkezian Drive-and Miriam Way. -The:impacts.on Park Lane would be similar to those on Sarkazian Way, i.e., an increase of 10'vehicles per day with the proposed counter-clockwise circulation plan and an increase of 100 vehicles per'day with a clockwise circulation plan. In both cases there will be an insignificant impact on the surrounding residential streets. The analysis is also adequate for the,parking.accumulation. The maximum use will be maximum occupancy of the church during the period when the day care.is in operation: The requirement for these two-uses is 46 spaces or 4 less than the parking supply. Please respond if you have any additional questions. Walt - Headers Return-Path:<wlaabs @tjkm.com> Received: from rly-za05.mx.aol.com (rly-za05.ii ail aol.tom [172.31.36.101]).by•air-za02.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.21)with E ;Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:21:09 =0500 Re d: from megapathdsi.net (snowbird;megapath.net [216.200.1761)) by rly-za05.mx.aol.com (v7721.21)with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:20:50 -0500 . Received: from [208.184.184.56] (HELO WALT) by megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro•SMTP 3.3.2) with SMTP id 16472346; Tue, 13'Mar 2001 1620:03 -0800 Received: by WALT with Microsoft Mail. id <01COABD9.42320080 @WALL'S; Tue, 13.Mar2001 16:18:37 -0800 Message-ID: <01COABD9.42320080 @WALT> From: Walter Laabs <wlaabs @tjkm.com> To: "'Lewit3@cs.comm <Lewit3 @cs.com> Cc: "'gwhite @ci.petaluma.ca.us"' <gwhite @ci.petaluma,ca.us> Subject:Salvation Army Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:18:35 -0800 . MIME-Version: 1.0 . Content-Type: text/plain, charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding::quoted-printable • S Tuesday,March 13,2001 CompuServe:Lewit3 Page: 1 yq � • • • k f7 iisls``'l.}�'- • March 12,2001 r >r" Ms. Bets*Lewitter 4.4a:94,1et t City of Petaluma if/a/p"if Planning Department 11 Enghsh,Street 4171 Petaluma.CA 94952 Traffic.Analysisdor,the Salvation Army Cburch.and'Child Day Care Dear Ms. Lewitter; Referance_ismadeto the traffic analysis;performed,fottheproposed Salvation.Army Church and Child Day Care at 721 McDowell,,Boulevard South and to the comments taken at the City of Petaluma Planning Commissionmeeing of February 13,2001. Atthat meeting, two concerns were raised relative to traffic impacts. These were the potential for traffic impacts an the,nearby streets of Sarkezian Drive and Marian Way arid the adequacy of the proposed parking supplyias deterntured by the requirements contained in the City of Petaluma Zoning Ordinance To better address-the concern of traffic intrusion into adjacent.neighborhoods, traffic volumercounts.were conducted on March 6;2001,during the evening cominute period. During the p.m.peak hour 4l vehicles were observed on•SarkazianDrive(19 westbound and 22 eastbound)while 47 vehicles were observed of Marian • Way(25'Westbound and 22 eastbounnd). • The ideal capacity ofaresidential street is 2000 vehicles per day and is used as a design.value ln'th.e'City of Petaluma Streets.Standards. •Typically the p.m.peak hour accounts for 10 percent of the average daily,traffle- volume(ADT)on.a residential street. The measured traffic volumes on Sarkezian-Drive would correspond to a daily traffic volume-of 410 vehicles per daywhile Marian Way would have a projected daily,traffic'volume of 470 vehicles per day. The current,daily.traffic volumes of Sarkezian Drive and Marian Way are below 25 percent of the ideal,capacity of the street: The potential traffic impacts'to Sarkezian Drive and Marian Way are assessed based Upon the proposed site and driveway configurations. Using the proportion of vehicle activity on Sarkezian Drive and-Marian.Way to the total traffic volume measured at the intersection of Mc Dowel 1 Boulevard South/Sarkezian Drive-Marian Way during,the pm. peak hour, only one(1)vehicle from the Salvation Army Church arid!Day Care would . be anticipated to use Sarkezian.Drive or Marian Way during the p.m..peak hour The corresponding daily • increase would be approximately 10'vehicles per day. The Suiting increase will have a lessthan•siglificant impact on"SarkezianDrive or Marian Way using the ideal residential capacity of 2000 vehicle per day. The potential impactof an alternative site access configuration on Sarkezian Drive and Marian Way was reviewed as v eil. The akemative site access.could restrict the left turn movemerrts.from the site which would have the potential to divert project related,traffic through adjacent neighborhoods. The resulting impact on Sarkezian and Marian.Way could be as great,as an increase of ten (10) vehicles during the'p.m. peak hour The resulting increase would correspond to an additional•10e vehicles per day on each street. Although the addition often p m.peak hourttip is greater than under the proposed project site access configuration,the resulting traffic volumes would still remain well below the ideal capacity of both Sarkezian-Drive and Marian WHITLOC.K & W'EIN:nEROE:R TRANSPORTATION INC • 509 Sewmh Slreel..$ada 101 Santo Rosa,CA 95.101 • 1707)542.9500 • FAX 1707) 542.9590 . www.w.irons.coin H o La `i 9 P 7 C/] Cr.,a 11 c 0 CO c o o 9b rn coo 0 - ' t C t . wi- nno r c nn ^ O c� CD C O ^o LC 0 i FC . o G �, n cn w 0 cm .N; A . (A o.. c • Ca o r o 00 0 S CD CD . G a dn - t7 °c `�° as G G L N• T 'y - a Uj ��//?--- O � im^ N n V .� CD n 0 n C 0 0 N < n 4 00 - n 'y CD C a >. n g �-r 17 n O • 0 Cl) y ,o o 0 y c a va to P. • crl G\ Go W .co .t0 to 6 CS CC O tn. N 0 !'7 O O O O w co CS O O O w O W �. O ¢, C7 "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 Cr V' O = a a r+ .y O r* `y V] C 0 o c o o o c o o c a o o n w in .- w w , tr. .. • O. .-, V] O 0 0 0 0 . ;o 0 0 !:' Oo w `.' W 1 H 8 o co 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 000, b o o co ^ G 0 • Do t a N_A o O N oo 4.1 o. O O O C O O .i 0 0 ..� 0 - o n n � in a a O n0 v; to o tron: y `6 R. 0. Vi O BCD CD "O w 5 Q.. O C O .NO .� H C. n �n K `B O a N 'G'� 'O. .c-' 'OC .- O CD Lyil y` a O co. N N Va 0. C`p 0.. N O`O ' 4 W „ �j- P� O CD WW c T CD ° ti 'a x. c 0 .. V? CD C N 00 y 0. �' (D r cm O R Q =. O" v+ G O� r�-r a Dc a -a t C . • O ° b a LC cn O`d o c/] a a c AyTACAFMENT /0 • a e00000 ch Z nn (-).t. Gl nC no < c) o nnn ° a: Ca �. o a O _, o > -• n o 5 c .a n o a o_ o a a o rn `a rn C w P n '< °o° o' p, b O m o n n a 5 a o c c n n a Crntio c wx a' Gx no Ed n ° o . c &I a °r; - .... m 2 oo - to m m ° �. -aa as C = a Q. .8W : n n �o Q ,_.y " 0 a ti Cr cn E � n CI) -7.- n � w Cn7n �_ ' n � ' nn0- v rt 0' -, "'C C° Cl) cn c0 .. O CD Cn td n a• o Q 00 n cn . a. P > b U K. CID 6. L.• n O O°. O O O O O O O 0 o 0 0 C o o o'o N O c C O O w 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ° ° ° o o 0 0 0 0 S. o o -. o c cn N W "' N Q, to w w cm °, co 'la c.n:0" w • O O O 0O p'WO 0 000N O . o0O O ' O p O O O O co o 0 O' . . O o:. O o O-4 o r. c, A O\ N 0. N . . -. 0 O O is a 0 0 0 0 tit O. E'O 0 0 , g N.0 0 Ui e o ° o, cam`. C.2s -1 o v, ti Et °: o n b a a$ t a, m w b CD rn 0 O o, -• o 6- n ., .0 �u n �," ,--• rn 4o o' •400 ! .a v 4zaa a,� � v° n c A n a. O O C O h `< r. ., p LC > O w w y N Cl, y ^' OoL' OC . G t< O N . t N "7 O Q' f' Petaluma, CA. March 15, 2001 • 'immunity Development Dept. Planning Division,City of Petaluma - 11 English St. Petaluma,CA. Gentlemen: I just finished reading in the Argus-Courier that a group of neighbors are requesting 39 separate meetings with the Salvation Army to discuss the proposed childcare center. WOW! This is worse than the Limited Nations. At any rate; as an interested party living a block away, please register my support for the project and my sympathies for Lt. Hoover. • ,Sincerely, ; ; SHY* e 21/1r,� 'z-' /. Z •obert L. Comyns • tri'ff� � F 1424 Tanager Lane tl!iai� F ZQ(l j Petaluma,CA. 94954 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • • • Armck HE/Jr /1 ion 1 3/14/01 3,31 PM • March g, 2001 Community Development Dept. Planning Commission 11 English St. Petaluma, Ca 94952 •J v rg GPZui�Nf GrFiti`I1}��t.i`i` r,i id11, I I:I.C Ladies and Gentlemen, I am very distressed to learn what the Salvation Army is planning to do in our neighborhood. Particularly in light of the fact that their property is adjacent to mine, and we share the same backyard fence. I believe in the work the Salvation Army does, however, feel that our neighborhood is not the appropriate location for such a facility. As a parent.- my first thoughts are for the safety of my son. He now enjoys the freedom to play with the other children in the neighborhood • without constant supervision. We do not want this to be jeopardized by the influx of the homeless. We don't need to worry about the "baggage" that people in these types of situations carry with them. We don't need to worry about the "outside" elements that their past lives carry with them, and the lingering friendships that these people have with those that still have problems. With my background of working with the mentally ill, it is a known fact that a very high percentage of homeless people have mental problems, which includes their need for medication and/or lack of same, which creates problems which we should all be aware of. THIS WILL ALL BE BROUGHT INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. As a neighbor— We know our neighbors well and trust each other. We watch each others children, and we embrace the safety that being in a close knit neighborhood' brings. Our neighbors are good citizens, drug free, stable:& hardworking. We are a neighborhood filled with people that have worked hard to buy our homes in this neighborhood, and I feel privileged to be living • here. I am proud of the fact that I have worked hard to attain this privilege. I want my son to grow up in a safe, secure, friendly and healthy environment. This neighborhood has provided us with that. NOW IBIS PUTS US AT RISK. • To even contemplate building a barrier (to cut out noise you say) Is every upsetting, to say the least. It might cut down some of the noise but what a terrible eyesore!!!!! 'I:am against this 100%. "I do not want: to look at an ugly wall from my backyard. I have spent too many hours beautifying my yard so that we may enjoy our leisure hours. I always look forward to the weekends with my family & friends getting together for our barbeques, etc. I can't believe that you can even think of doing such a ridiculous thing. Put yourself in my shoes; would you want this to happen IN YOUR OWN BACKYARD? As a homeowner — What happens to our property values? You may say nothing. Wrong! By being required to disclose this type of housing in close proximity upon selling our homes, our property is immediately devalued. Trafficis another negative issue. Most of the residents have small children and they know each other, playing together on Sarkesian street feeling quite comfortable due to the fact there is not a lot of traffic., If. • this facility gets approval for the planned activities, there is going to be much more traffic on our street and the side streets in the vicinity, posing a great safety issue re: automobiles vs children at play. I do not like the long extended hours of`6a.m, to 10p.m. I am a single mother with a small child, and I fear for our safety. Being alone in the evening with people wandering;around my home at all hours will /Hake me a nervous wreck I want you to PLEASE stop and think about this important decision; how you would feel is this is in your backyard, and if you.had'a small child and/or children. I'm sure the Salvation Army could find a nice piece of property somewhere that is not in a residential area , If this was to be approved, even with the stipulation that the homeless shelter would not be included in the program, WHO IS TO SAY THAT SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE, 6.mos, 1 yr. that they won't go ahead and add the program at facility? Who could stop them. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Sincerely; 1 • kULIE.IcNIG T 6 - , Co— , y cs 4 • 4') 041-azint0- 7 9/5;6> hL IA) cp 1:A•9-0,-(1) / cavk-t ,`S.L.2-61 ctr ( .it 0 it. )(2-0-72}-)-- c & i fanci <, Ai r2,4A---ti )904, A u 29_ . - „Ar"?11 (a'1/41--v c2r-c,,, te-i--,--e-/-1) r- 0-ea o •fr A A- v\-- , 4 , 017, t. 66,-4} 04A- r Lac- • (A, MRp s r s p NErEtiipo h 2001 72/ .1 iELJJ4H., Jan Tolbert From: Conhie,MadFid [omadrid©iscweb.com] • Sent: Thursday, March 08;2001 1:24 PM To: planning©ci:petaluma:ca'.us Subject: Salvatiori Army Complex at:721 South McDowell Deer. .Planhing Department, I am concerned about the plans that our neighbors are discussing in connection with the Salvations new site an South McDowell . Before this project is approved,. I hope that -you are going to do a traffic impact study on the proposed project rat 721 South McDowell . I also hope that you can study the effect the. proposed types of business operations they are planning and how they will effect the existing neighborhood. If it wasn' t for the fact that it is• a predominately residential area I don-' t think the neighbors of the project would be as. concerned. It sounds like a more commercial area would be more appropriate. Please do not approve. this project until these issues are addressed completely! Sincerely, Connie Madrid Resident of 1451 Pheasant Drive • • • • • • • 1 . _ , • . • . . . . ... , ,..,. . . . ,,.... . . . . . . ..„ •.. . . . . ,.•„ :.. . :-• •, . . ., . , ..: . . . • . .,:„ ... . . - : ..,... ,... ...., _ ;SZ.;".. :,, bp.„ ;fr, v•...t. . 4"c" " . •• ' ::Pir;if71 -77,tf'''S;->.7V 4L.----- ' :7.';.,,' ' ',',/erit'azral l'.'• ...1?,+-1411;;;;:if..4 '', .;••• Sileizitii.;,-- - 2:,241 k\ ;.•-• ,., " • i.,•91.fr,:` ''' 4,:s.....4.0.-,4E ct, . ,,_*:- Igi ''‘ ./,46,,,,A":" .14:;A7579—''', . 1 IZ,:f- .1 ..'4'r-iliqi3V- '. 011::trbii \■. :.'t ,' 94 . .. .., . . _,-..... _., , 3'.i. — f AV, ri t.-k' I 4 "" 0 5 yi 11 ke-- .- — — — . , . . . ... : " Jran'.. Ail .„..7, c ,,,..ji). ,-_,, ..;',-. , .:'• .::: c..-:'. . - : .., . • • ''. .'..!# I g,,,,47 ';." . : . M v 6,? 21.--:-. fr!,45.-1-7- /c j" r' • c.,:• . . . . • • 1.-.-•1 Pct. - e l'i'dc_r_P=:-_7- A2E: 'c,?,■'it - i;j,..,, , , _.,_ - : , I A'(-/LC-1;-56L; tQ),,, &. 777.4 flIC t4( 0 ' • A: . 71/40 li-;,E5.17,-/ ;C &T cr,. I ,r.iir i • I y;,„"; t; I." . . . . .. .,,. „ 'arCl'at . I ...--Th • I i ll . ;1 Pit,t; c'' Ps( ' .,' ,...-.• . .. . . . . tc'cl‘ /r,--±f1-----1(--±lj.7: ' )44.2( : •.'...., . . : .... '4' . ., :•. ct't•-' 1, C:12.<.7-- ',/;"-"-x,"--:---;,,.., o" . , (A . ),.. .. .:, . • P P ,(.." i -A i ' • • • 'Q'.1,-, r'6 ,c% •2•._ < , . 4...''41 . , .. ..:,, .... I laH- -11 4,,:,),.., .•,1 .. .. • ...,., .9, .;•,.. . C- i !.L.,1-1 P. ,,,4.; 1 cir ,,._.„,. ,..r., ...?, % !,oip•:t,.) , • ,i,,..,. ' '4,`97r—a• "‘er--1=--Thrra...,....„„,,r , .-- A, - .. ... .-e-- ;:%•• •Ity nj,„,,,-- 84-1•4:„.....„,L,4„:Aiffircp,,,••••( ,:,c• ,25.. • ._.11_,, .0. .-,,,, ,p,. :.•_•-•0 .-.. ,•.,,• •,,peressam.,.,-9, . , .:.. . . . --......,_th..„•_.......L:.-:....-- ----....=. •••••:,- t,--,•• ' __,........• . ...- •:., - .•:;•.•." . . • . •.... „ :. . •, -• . . .. • ..: •• • . . ri...,•,- . . , ::::::,: • ..:., ,,.. . . • . .,., • . . . : . ...::.... . : .: •E,,•:: • . . • •,..... , , . ...,.:. . . . , •...,:.':;,,,,E. - .,•,:....:.• ,••.: • . . ,.. . .. . • H...„..:. • . ,• : ,,,. ::: : . , .,. ... .,.. , . . 0 .. ., . . ., . • • .. . . . • : :, 1... • . . :: • 1 . : ,,.,..,..:::, . . . . . . . .. . . . : . ........ :..:. : • .;;•:::::„ . .: .. . . • . •:,:',":)' '',!• ,;:. . . .. . . ..., .: :. - . . • . .:.,. . ,. , : '..,'.':: :•;.,: ..1 ' . . . . . . .. :,...... . . February 16, 2001 • FEB G, 2no, Members of the Petaluma Planning Commission, �. . i 7V nr /1 �1 p r,c q ry Planning �� i�liT V�EV��.V°Mtl°�TDEuARlhftf!i'. Army pro elf on South duke to:go on record as being strongly opposed toathe Salvation lArmd myself.I would 1', J McDowell and Caulfield.'This project is a serious matter from many different standpoints, which I would have been happy to express at the February meeting had I only known about this before now However one of my largest concerns is the lack of consideration to'the affected neighborhood by the City of Petaluma. This project has an obvious stench of deception and betrayal. The only explanation I can see for confining the city plans to a very small and select group of neighboring homes would only serve to lessen the opposition. As the City of Petaluma knows very will it's easier to ignore a small group than to fight an army of disappointed and outraged citizens of a neighborhood. I look forward-to being on any and all mailing lists having to do with subject in the future. • Thank-you c• 4nd-4 —^aiu 4 .�ku.o The Shaw family • 1505 Sierra Dr. Petaluma, Ca. 94954 A I IEVE!NEn �- D 2 FEB 2 2 2001 • �. COM UNIFYDEVCLO��EN;uEN r{j ENT Au, Cad �C/. /f, ,v`9 _ -49- ,Sal 'Jr;- . .2/167ict-/cr-2,2 y/ #/ :yi . / item 0 —/3 —9/, ie St 4011"? 1 , /,21,/7/2,745 axe ' ifi - / P/ (is cw66 47//72 4- om dap afrd 405-AS ACC 1 , /v1 7olisi 27C , , 47 ,OCR! .d� y / ,//,, , / % % /!'iii //i2 ' . r ,d.44,C I_ ,I7W ,, , s, ' ,467117 /C l/" 'I i , CrC /� , 6 6 /# 7 • et- . Alif . . • '-1.7-7-spl i i . Cam.. ,c/aC ri/n $ . (2S �� i,��« ) • M'!.I A/,I�) February 15, 2001 RECEIVED • FEB 2 0 2000i Petaluma Planning Commission COfvihUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT C/O All Members 11 English Street Petaluma,CA 94952, Shame on you, Petaluma Planning Commission, As a homeowner in the area of the Salvation Army project, my husband and I attended the meeting on February 13,2001. I have a.few concerns I would like to air. I heard from every member on the board the need for this project to advance day care for the children. My question is how are these children supposed to get three hot meals a.day, if they are only going to use their kitchen for weddings or special meetings —in the Salvation Army's words. Another concern is where are these 150 people going to park to pick:bp;the food giveaway. There are only 50 or so parking places on their property; the Salvation Array says. Also, at this time you can't know the impact of added traffic, • withouiknowing how many people will be going in and out, until this project is completed. At which time it will be too late. Homeowners are worried and have a right to be. We are worried about to many unansweredkquestions, to say go ahead. We need more time on this to make'us'want this in our neighborhood. Also, we were,never notified about this major project. We had to read about it in the Press Democrat, that's why',we came to the meeting, to get more details. There were so many neighbors that came, you had to extend the time and tell the Salvation Army to notify more of-the neighbors farther away, this will let more people be aware of this major project. Another concern of ours is the value of our homes, going down if this project is going forward: My husband and I are going to do further studying • on this matter. William and Berta.Curr • 244 PG2-4 • y y f _ Petaluma Health Care Distfiet DtdinUtel to communityhFaltb and wellness: , • February 13, 2001 1. • Ms. Betsi Lewitter, Contract Planner Petaluma City Hall %U lMUIVIT V DEVELOPMENT DEP4RIMENI 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 Fax r 778-4498 Dear Ms. Lewitter: The Petaluma Health Care District convened a forum on community hunger in the fall of 2,000. The Salvation Army, represented by Captain Hoover, was a principle participant in this forum and worked with us to resolve issues. One of the primary issues identified by this forum was the lack of space'for-distribution of food supplies. The Salvation Army was able to provide this space,in their,new location on McDowell Boulevard and worked very collaboratively with St. Vincent de Paul regarding planning and implementation._ Over the last eighteen months the Petaluma Health Care District has had an opportunity to look at the needs regarding child daycare in Southern Sonoma County. One of the primary areas of need has been for daycare that would be available,:for low and moderate- income families. It is our`understanding that the program that is being-proposed at the McDowell.Street location would serve this population. There are few facilities in Southern Sonoma County that have the capacity and ability to be operational in the.event of an area wide emergency. Itismy understanding that the McDowell Street location will have the ability to act as a triage facility and will have its own electrical generator.in case of wide spread power outage. Our experience in working with the Salvation Army has been'positive-and they have shown a willingness to work with community-based organizations and look at solutions that are positive for Southern Sonoma County. • Sincerely, Daymon R. Doss, CEO • Petaluma Health Care District 1290 No. McDowell Blvd. -Peiaiurna, CA 94954 7071766-7945 Fax 707/766-9110 www,rihcd.org Petaluma Health Care District Board of Directors Planning Commission Minutes - March 27,.2001 • �p,L,U City of Petaluma, California City Council Chambers 4 . - '7 City Hall, 11 English Street Gh fl 1 ,:., Petaluma, CA 94952 Telephone 797/7784301/'Fax. 707/778-4498 I 1 E=Mail planning(ci.petalumaca.us.' 85$, Web Page http./hvww.ci.petaliuna:ca:us • 1 2 Planning Commission Minutes EXCERPT 3 March 27, 2001 — 7:00 PM 4 5 Commissioners: Present:. Barrett Broad*, Glass, Monteschio, Vieler, Vouri 6 Absent: O'Brien 7 * Chair 8 9 Staff: Mike Moore, Community:Development Director 10 George White, Planning Manager • 11 Bonne Gaebler,Housing Administrator 12 . Irene Borba, Senior,Planner 13 Jane Thomson,-Sr. Planning Technician 14 Betsi Lewitter, Contract Planner 15 Jan Tolbert, Administrative Secretary 16 17 18 OLD BUSINESS 19 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: 20 21 H. SALVATION ARMY PETALUMA CENTER — 721 South McDowell Blvd., 22 AP No. 007-570-028. Conditional Use Permit (CUP00014). Request for CUP 23 to allow construction and operation of a variety of religious services, 24 community assembly and social programs in the R-1-6,500 Zoning District: 25 Project Planner: Betsi Lewitter 26 27 (Continued from the February 13,2001 meeting.) 28 29 Betsi Lewitter — Presented the staff report - discussed services-proposed-to be provided; 30 City Attorney present to answer questions; Salvation Army has agreed to all conditions 31 proposed to be'imposed; CEQA does not allow any alleged loss of property values in 32 regard to a decision on this item, additional analysis from acoustical engineer included - 33 did not expect noise to be an issue - smaller trees might be more effective than larger 34 trees; grounds maintenance equipment restricted hours; lighting concerns discussed by 35 lighting engineer; traffic concerns discussed in traffic analysis; applicant's master cost°' cOoNc>( A$ENbA n ArrAcei newt- 41 Planning Commission Minutes- March 27, 2001 1 schedule of operations was 'used to determine on-site parking requirements - deemed • 2 adequate; resulting traffic volumes discussed; landscape architect discussed. some 3 landscaping screening alternatives; special events listed in revised master schedule of 4 operations; additional noticing was extended to 600 feet from ,site; neighborhood 5 meetings continued to be held, staff recommends approval of CUP based on finding"s and. 6 subject to proposed conditions. 7 Pat Parks - Police Chief'-.Research;regarding Salvation Army - 4 Police reports in last 8 10 years - nothing serious; have 'been. very good neighbors in 'Petaluma; sometimes 9 confused with soup kitchen, etc,; Brian Hoover very cooperative, other Salvation Army 10 locations in Sonoma County - not aware of any problems this is a religious non-profit 11 organization - no problems with other food give-away'programs of this type; not aware,of 12 any crime problems associated with Salvation, Army; many businesses/residences in 13 Petaluma have more problems than Salvation Army; will,work with neighborhood groups 14 to help understand crime issues associated with this proposal. 15 Wayne Miller - Project Architect - 328 Smith Drive, Petaluma - received letters from 16 neighbors - concerns with proposed uses, design and site planning issues, initiated 17 additional outreach meetings - 4 consecutive Monday night meetings - concerns that 18 :project would attract vagrants, etc.; first meeting attended by about 100:people - each 19 subsequent meeting attended by smaller. group of people; there are still neighbors in 20 opposition - original design has not, been substantially altered - design is sound; will 21 continue to refine design through entitlement process; will continue to work with 22 surrounding neighbors during project refinement; acoustical engineer and electrical • 23 engineer:in attendance to discuss sound/light mitigations. 24 Fred Svinth -Acoustical Engineer - average`noisetilevels would be•,about.60 decibels - 25 occasionally noise into the low 70's - has looked at wall designs - '8 foot wall' could 26 reduce`all.noise levels to 60 decibels. 27 Commissioner Barrett - Will you propose an 8 foot wall now? 28 Fred Svinth - Will propose relocating (loudest) children (preschoolers) further away 29 from residences. 30 Commissioner Vieler - Fence construction design'standards? 31 Fred Svinth-Wood or masonry - type.of construction still being looked;at.- 32 Commissioner Vieler- Fence around entire property or only north area? 33 Fred Svinth -•For sound issues, only north area. 34 Commissioner Glass Would 2 make this quieter? 35 Fred Svinth -No, one 8 foot tall'fence. 36 Commissioner Broad- Questions regarding materials?' 37 Fred Svinth - Masonry more solid material -properly designed wood fence would also 38 work. 39 Commissioner Broad Along north property line? - . • 40 Fred.Svinth -Described proposed fence line (pre-school play area) - more detailed line 41 of site analysis will need to be done. 42 S. Doctor Electrical Engineer- photometric study for this site- parking lot lights 43 directed;down:toward parking lot; major concern headlights from cars in driveway - eight 44 foot solid fence would block headlights from neighboring,property. 45 Commissioner Glass - when cars enter driveway-- headlights aimed.up what)size fence • 46 to negate? 2 Planning Commission Minutes- March 27, 2001 • 1 S. Doctor - when lights aimed up - lights would be above roof - eight foot fence would 2 suffice to eliminaterlights. 3 Commissioner Barrett - That assumes houses are 40 feet from site? 4 S. Doctor - Looking at worst case ..proposed fence would eliminate problems; parking . 5 lot lights on 7-day timer programmed to go off at a certain time. 6 Commissioner Glass - What would a sports utility vehicle light'height be? 7 S. Doctor- 54 inches - worst case scenario -lights would be at 7 feet. 8 Wayne Miller - In terms of sound and light - landscape architect has looked at fast- 9 growing plantings. 10 Commissioner Vouri - What distance are houses on north'property line? 11 Wayne Miller - Worst.case - within 20 feet of fence line; will address specific design 12 issues on house by house basis; anticipated doing this type of specific analysis. 13 ' Commissioner Barrett - Has there been discussion of changing storage area and daycare 14 area? 15 Wayne Miller- One consideration;in placing childcare area: need secure area - potential 16 of bringing more traffic onto site. 17 CommissionerBarrett - Storage/daycare building uses,should be switched, move pass- 18 through. 19 Wayne Miller - Social.Services is an administrative/on-going function - would cut down 20 on traffic; intensity of use would.be increased to back of property; believes this is lowest 21 impact solution - could consider re-thinking layout. • 22 Commissioner Broad -Why couldn't front parking lot be used for daycare? 23 Wayne Miller- Awaits direction from Planning Commission. 24 Commissioner Vieler•- How'would storage area have increased use? 25 Wayne Miller - That is not the only use of that building: 26 Captain Hoover - Regarding daily uses - fully willing to put up walls..requested - would 27 put up walls/landscaping at beginning of project; will not seek legal remedies under the 28 Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000;;agreed to make child care 29 slots available to neighborhood;,requested 2 neighborhood members to sit on board; 24- 30 hour access to Salvation Army representatives; staff member will live on site; will not 31 add any new social services operations; aesthically appealing chapel will be designed to 32 help eliminate some stereotypes; will only use quiet maintenance equipment (brooms, 33 electric blowers); proven community need. 34 Commissioner Montesdhio - Regarding hours of operation - Saturday hours should be 35 10PM. 36 Chair Broad(on Commissioner OBrien's behalf) - Did you (Hoover) receive Dr. Bush's 37 letter(39 concerns)? 38 Captain Hoover- Yes, did not quite understand no. 5. 39 Chair Broad - What'do you have in writing stating no overnight stays? . 40 Captain'Hoover—No overnight stays except for existing,SFD. • 41 Chair Broad -.Site plan including adjacent properties - have you prepared plan? 42 Captain Hoover -No,.have not prepared plan. 43 Chair Broad -Have:youwdealt with amplified music issue? • 44 Captain Hoover- No outside amplified music/alcohol allowed. 45 Chair Broad -Have you reviewed volunteer/workers backgrounds?' 46 Captain Hoover - Yes. 3 • Planning Commission Minutes - March 27, 2001 1 Chair Broad =Site plan showing sound walls? • 2 Captain Hoover- Yes,,willing to do that. - 3 Chair Broad Will new wood-fence be allowed next to City easement? 4 Captain.Hoover -No information on that: 5 Chair Broad - How many times have you met with neighborhood.group? 6 Captain Hover- .7 times, notes/video-taped meetings. 7 Chair Broad - Sound walls adequately addressed? . 8 Captain Hoover- Willing to put in wall`to-adequately mitigate noise: 9 Chair Broad -Did Building Official make comments? to Betsi Lewitter - Building Official cial has no negative comments at this time - will review in 11 more detail- is aware of all uses. 12 Commissioner Glass - Talking about 8 foot tall sound/light wall - feasible to make entire 13 • wall 8•;feet soundwall - would that be beneficial? 14 Captain Hoover- adjacent neighbor really does;not want an 8 foot soundwall. 15 Wayne Miller - Can make,wall work(wood,or,masonry) -_may need to come up with an 16 integrated system -will discuss with all neighbors.during design. 17 Dr. Bush;- 716 Park_Lane - Home for 17 years -iSalvation Army having much more of 18 an impact than they anticipated, all support Salvation Army - benefit to community- are 19 things said here legally binding? Some plans not conducive to quiet residential 20 neighborhood; impasse has been reached between neighborhood and Salvation Army; 21 there has never been a Use Permit.(with existing church) - Salvation Army has chosen to expand 22 g in Writing; pp oughts from 23 Planning . childcare dg pt ngMitigated 24 Negative Declarat nand Use Permit - incomplete; all for being neigliborly'and 25 courteous. 26 Chair Broad -.Is testimony during meeting legal agreement? 27 George White,-Testimony here probably`not legal - adopted written conditions would 28 belegal record/requirements. 29 Betsi;Lewitter - Read;Condition 1 -;Indicatessizes ofbuildings/description of operations 30 in master schedule of operations/description/89 conditions of approval included in.staff 31 report. . . 32 Member of public (gave no identification) - Sarkesian - Inconsistencies in traffic 33 analysis/parking;. number of parking spaces is not clear - with up to 60 children in 34 daycare, traffic/parking problems will be overwhelming; traffic on McDowell will be 35 backed up/double parked. Petition signed by over 200 citizens in opposition to this 36 project. 37 Chair Broad-Please go over activity you say`i`s not listed in master listing. 38 Unidentified member of public (above) - After school program - pg. 1, line 35 of 39 original staff report- not mentioned in master schedule. . 40 Kimberly Keller -`741.5. McDowell - Single mother, would use this daycare facility - 41 resents being wrongly categorized. 42 Captain,Hoover -Explained need for childcare; procedure for hiring childcare workers 43 (finger-printing, etc.) 44 Leslie Robin - Sarkesian Drive--Read letter from Attorney Lysons (already received by 45 Commission) - proposal should' not include warehouse facility, warehouse facility • 4 Planning Commission Minutes - March 27, 2001 • .i intensifies this use, - additional traffic and noise incompatible: with residential 2 neighborhood; deny warehouse use: - 3 No name given -;231 Wilson Street (PEP project) On behalf of board of directors - 4 thank God for Salvation Army - great-grandmother_ please approve this project, it is 5 needed, the neighborhood church (previous use) had people living on site —Salvation 6 Army does not allow this - all should attend church one time on Sunday - see how nice it 7 is; remembers going to Salvation Army,when a child (is 73 years old today). 8 Kim Blaksley - Alta Drive 2 children, mail carrier in neighborhood God has 9 Salvation Army where it should be; 14,600 lbs. of food collected by mail carriers last to year for Salvation Army; thank God for Salvation Army - befriended someone who 11 received food at Salvation Army (her name is Karen) - Salvation.Army provides needs to 12 community, children are a blessing - when they become teenagers, no one reaches out to 13 them; Salvation Army is reaching out to all, at Salvation Army 5-6 times a week, very 14 professional/caring staff; gave hi's heart to Jesus 5 years ago needed Salvation Army 15 services then. - 16 Carol Quan - Walks past this area on McDowell - very dangerous traffic area now; 17 entrance into church parking lot - driveway very close to McDowell - nowhere for traffic 18 to get into project site - not safe;,;stop lights.are just about ignored; donates to Salvation 19 Army - does not feel safe with this project - walks at night, does not want this in 20 community. 21 John Lowery - Daniel Drive - Flas Commission looked at similar facilities to analyze • 22 impacts to other neighborhood's? • 23 Betsi Lewitter - Police Chief-Parks addressed that earlier Brian Sheridan - 1429 Sarkesian Drive - Put letter into public record - questions - 25 should all aspects of this project be allowed? This church does not have a good design, 26 should be redesigned mote aesthically; should daycare• be allowed? If neighborhood 27 children are allowed to be included, would be an asset, warehouse should not be,allowed, 28 not a local service - outreach program; project should not be allowed in neighborhood; 29 project should not be approved. 30 Commissioner Vieler.-How many neighborhood children should be allowed? 31 Brian Sheridan - 25-30%. 32 Chair Broad- Concerns re: hours of operation of daycare? 33 Brian Sheridan - Daycare should be closed at 6-7 PM concerns with noise and 34 increased traffic in neighborhood;already dangerous intersection. 35 Unidentified member of public -This project should not be allowed/considered. 36 Paul Pretzel - 3820 Bodega Ave. - Has had an active interest in Salvation Army - 37 statements made that this is a faceless corporation coming into the City - Salvation Army 38 would be very responsive to community - voiced support for 'a great asset; City and 39 Salvation Army very responsive. 40 Bob Hill'- 1401Sarkesian - Represents wife and two sons - lives 120 yards from site; in 41 support of this project. 42 43 Public hearing was closed. 44 45 Commission Discussion: 46 5 Planning Commission Minutes- March 27, 2001 1 Commissioner Glass - Applicant not playing hard-ball; has willingly tried to be 2 forthcoming, applicant:has right to have application processed by July;applicant +could go • 3 a different route -. work-out mitigations.palatable; less of an intrusion - sound wall''at 8 4 foot height, as effective as possible, open to moving the building (Barrett's suggestion); 5 supports day/evening care - need to-go beyond normal hours of daycare; regarding traffic 6 concerns - McDowell very busy = factual data has been presented, Sarkesian is only at 7 about 25% of capacity now - cannot:turn this down because of traffic on.Sarkesian"- road 8 will more than accommodate this additional traffic;.focus on battles based on fact,.not on 9 emotion;. property values brought up - out of this pervue; Police Chief indicated that 10 Salvation Army has:agood record in this community and in the County, food distribution 11 is necessary -.benefits isome residents in this!neighborhood; with utility bills going up - 12 will be more and-more important;;further discuss moving buildings around. 13 Commissioner Barrett- This project has a,lot of good qualities - likes extended hours of 14 daycare - switch positions of daycare and storage facility; access to storage facility 15 should not be intensive or inconvenient to neighbors; administration building location 16 moving may be a little inconvenient; wants this to work for everyone; additional 17 screening from evergreens - great idea - sound absorbing; concerned with additional 18 traffic onto Sarkesian, Mr. Hill brought measure of community feeling which should be 19 adopted,,should be able to call representatives of Salvation,Army if there are problems, 20 appreciates all concessions made by Mr. Hoover- should be included into any approval, 21 Commissioner Monteschio - agrees this will be an asset to community; would like 22 percentage of,childcare from neighborhood; SPARC look at traffic, sound, etc. 23 Commissioner Vouri - (to Lewitter) - Discussion regarding septic system removal (if it 24 still exists). 25 Betsi Lewitter- Called County Environmental Health - still unknownif it;exists. 26 Commissioner Vouri - (to Rudnansky) - Reg arding your written answer about • 27 warehouse - more information. 28 Rich Rudnansky - Planning staff made a determination early that this use is ancillary to 29 primary use - is anissue of interpretation. 30 Commissioner Vouri - Size is one of the factors to be looked at? 31 George White - There�is room for an interpretation of what is subordinate. 32 Commissioner Vouri - (to Hoover) - Several members of public have requested 33 childcare hours of operation be changed -any flexibility? 34 Captain Hoover -More than willing to move morning hour back to 7AM (from 6AM), 35 evening hours - 10PM-would like to be able to see if need•is there - do not want to move 36 children after 10PM. 37 Commissioner Vouri -Not related to a standard working shift? 38 Captain Hoover - Many difficulties- new need - still seeing what will work. 39 Commissioner Vouri - Proposed uses represent fairly moderate use - not intensive, 40 believes childcare'belongs in a family neighborhood; is responsive to neighborhood 41 concerns - all should work together; 8 foot sound/light "wall should be-a condition of 42 approval, does not support moving building uses childcare play areas are the concern, 43 not the childcare buildings likes idea that daycare center'isolated from rest of project; 44 would like to consider another condition of approval - lighting that throws zero light - 45 sound and light mitigating wall should be put into place.before project begins; applicant • • 6 Planning Commission Minutes- March 27, 2001 • 1 should consider reducing evening hours for childcare (7AM to 9PM) does not want to 2 make a condition of approval. 3 Commissioner Vieler - (to Wayne Miller).- can you explain double door operation of 4 building? - 5 Wayne Miller - Allows vehicle to drive through building without backing up. 6 Commissioner Vieler - Questions regarding parking adequacy; there are discrepancies 7 regarding maximum parking needed? 8 Betsi Lewitter - Subsequent.downsizing (to 80 maximum). 9 Commissioner Vieler = So that will be changed to indicate 80 maximum? Applicant 10 should make 25% of childcarespaces available to neighborhood children- supports hours 11 of operation - 7PM _would allow l OPM. . 12 Chair Broad - Both sides have conducted themselves in a professional manner, 13 appreciates it; sound wall along north side - should 8 foot height be mandated by 14 Planning Commission? Four properties should agree to height. More discussion needed 15 by Commission - where should childcare component go? Should alternate location be 16 reviewed? Is there consensus? Walls/lighting/landscaping timing should be finished 17 before project begins; childcare should be open (25%) to neighborhood; still has lingering 18 concerns,regarding traffic/parking adequacy; (question to Wayne•Miller) - did you look at 19 angled parking spaces in various locations to reduce aisle width - one direction for 20 headlight orientation? 21 Wayne Miller - That would be a,possibility - depends on clearances, would be happy to ® 22 re-look at circulation./ flipping location of childcare/storage/angled parking. 23 Chair Broad - Re: hours of operation for childcare - 7AM start; (to Hoover) what time 24 are children brought inside in evening? (Hoover - believes summer 8PM), would 25 Commission like to see an alternative design (moving childcare)? 26 Commissioners Monteschio/Glass - Would like to see an alternative design. 27 Wayne Miller- Could-we work-with.SPARC on this? 28 Chair Broad - Too significant - would like to have review here, then SPARC review, 29 Commissioner Vieler (to Wayne Miller) - how would function be changed if this was 30 redesigned? 31 Wayne Miller - Can't say it wouldn't work - shifting buildings would lose some of 32 functions/distribution. 33 Captain Hoover - Storage facility set up with power panels-to be used for emergency 34 services in case of a disaster. 35 Commissioner Vouri - Supports Commissioner Vieler's idea to sent to SPARC in order 36 to move this project along. - trusts Commissioner Monteschio to bring PC concerns to 37 SPARC's attention. 38 Commissioner Monteschio - What is Planning Commission opinion? 39 Commissioner'Vieler - Suggestion - approve this project, with understanding that final 40 design come back;here.;before SPARC. 41 . George White - Yes, could be conditioned that way. 42 Chair Broad - Can look at two alternatives - would conditions change? Would be 43 cleaner not to approve project tonight if it would be brought back. • a44 Commissioner Vieler - To go through this whole thing again- reluctant to do that. 45 Commissioner Barrett - If we approve this with our additional conditions, could we do 46 that without reopening public review? 7 Planning Commission Minutes - March 27,2001 1 George White_ - Public comments would be limited to whatever changes were brought 2 about by the additional drawings. - • 3 Commissioner Glass - I think it is worth one more meeting - to get this project right, 4 neighborhood and Salvation Army might be happier; should not approve only a segment 5 of the project. 6 Commissioner Vielern- Would like this Commission to make statement that project be 7 •approved with conditions discussed - feels comfortable that this is just a design issue. 8 9 A motion was made by Commissioner Vieler and seconded by Commissioner Vouiri to 10 approve this project (with redesign alternative reviewed by Planning Commission before 11 going to SPARC) based on the findings and subject to the amended conditions as 12 discussed (to return to next Planning Commission with Resolution indicating all 13 changes/additions). 14 15 Commissioner Barrett: Yes 16 Commissioner Glass: Yes 17 Commissioner Monteschio: Yes 18 Commissioner O'Brien- Absent 19 Commissioner Vieler: Yes 20 Commissioner Vouri: Yes 21 Chair Broad. Yes 22 • • • • • S a 2 3 4 5 6 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA 7 PLANNING COMMISSION 8 9 ADOPTING A MITIGATION NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND 10 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMITFOR THE SALVATION 11 ARMY — 721 SOUTH McDOWELL BLVD. 12 13 WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit was,filed by the Salvation Army 14 to allow construction and operation of religious services and social programs on an 15 approximately 2 acre site in the R-1 6,500 zoning distri'ct,at 721 South McDowell; and 16 • 17 WHEREAS the Planning Commission held public hearings on February .13 and March 18 27, 2001 wherein public testimony was taken; and 19 • 20 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Petaluma Planning Commission; at their 21 meeting of March 27, 2001, voted to adopt a Mitigated,Negative Declaration finding that 22 the project, with the inclusion of Mitigation Measures, will not have a significant adverse 23 effect on the environment; and 24 25 WHEREAS the Planning Commission further voted to approve;a Conditional Use Permit 26 based on the findings and subject to the following conditions of approval: 27 28 NOTE: Changes from original findings/conditions =Italics 29 30 Findings for a Mitigated Negative Declaration: 31 32 1. That based upon the initial Study, potential impacts resulting from the project 33 have been identified. Mitigation measures have been proposed and agreed to by 34 the applicant as-a condition of project approval that will reduce potential impacts 35 to less than significant. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that supports 36 a fair argument that the project, as conditioned and .mitigated, would have a • 37. significant effect on The environment. 33 '39 2. That the project does not have the potential to affect wildlife resources as defined 40 in the State Fish and Game Code, either individually or cumulatively, and is 41 exempt from Fish and Game filing fees because it is proposed on an existing • 42 developed site surrounded by urban development with none of the resources as 43 defined in the Code. /► 1� 44 ore CCcJ/OC/t 4 6 "o,cr I 3. That the project is not located on a.site listed on any Hazardous Waste Site List 2 compiled by the State pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Califonaia Government 3 Code. 4 5 4 That the Planning Commission reviewed the Initial Study and considered public 6 comments before making a recommendation on the project, 7 - 8 5. That a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared •to ensure compliance 9 with the adopted mitigation measures. 10 1 t 6 That the record of proceedings of the decision on the project is available for 12 public revieww at the City of Petaluma Planning Division, City Hall, 11 ,English 13 Street; Petaluma, California. 14 15 Findings fora Conditional Use Permit: 16 17 1. That the project, as conditioned, will conform to the requirements and.the intent 18 of the Zoning Ordinance and the .General' Plan. Specifically, the proposal 19 implements General Plan Chapter 7, Goal 6 and Chapter 3, Objectives (i) and (o),. 20 Chapter 7, Objective (u) and Chapter 9, Objectives (d) and (g). Zoning Ordinance 21 Sections 6-401 and 6-409 conditionally: permit public and quasi=public buildings 22 and uses.of an educational, religious, or public service nature and day care in the 23 R-1-6,500 zoning district. The standards for conditional uses under Zoning 24 Ordinance Section21-300 were considered in the review of this project: 25 26 2 That the use, as conditioned, will not constitute a nuisance or besdetrimentalato the 27 public welfare of the,community: Traffic, noise and lighting studies,:assert that the 28 project will not have a significant adverse effect on the 'environment.- The 29 architectural and landscaping plans will be subject to the review and approval'by 30 the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee to ensure that the project will 31 be aesthetically pleasing. 32 33 3. The project implements the priorities of the Consolidated Plan II, 2000-2005, 34 adopted by the City Council on May 15, 2000. 35 36 Conditions of Approval: 37 38 From Die Planning.Department 39 40 1. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is granted to•allow construction of a 5,951. 41 square foot, 150-seat chapel; a 5,070 square foot social services and supplies 42 building; a 5,153 square foot childcare center and associated parking and site 43 improvements which shall be substantially as shown on•the revised plans dated 44 11/20/00. The operation of the uses shall be as stated in the Applicant's Project 4' Statement revised 11/20/00:,Prior to any change in the operation of the uses, the • 46 applicant shall apply for and be granted a Conditional Use Permit modification 47 from the City of Petaluma. 2 , 1 • 2 2. Within five days of an approval of the ConditionalUse.Permit, the shall 3 submit a check in the amount of:$35.00 payable to the Sonoma County Clerk for 4 the Notice of-Determination filing fee: 5 6 3. The use of ground-maintenance equipment shall be. restricted to 10:00 a:na. to . 7 4:00 p.m. to, reduce any potential annoyance. In addition, only electric leaf 8 blowers are permitted. 9 - 10 4. The Salvation Army Petaluma Center Advisory Board shall include two people t 1 from the South McDowell neighborhood who may attend monthly meetings during 13 which-any"concerns shall`be addressed. Documentation of the appointments shall 13 be received bythe City prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. ' 14 • 15 5. Prior to issuance of a..Certificate of Occupancy, evidence shall be provided to the 16 City that the phone number of the on-call 'administrative assistant has been 17 provided to adjacent neighbors and published in the phone hook for their use in 18 reporting operating problems. 19 20 6. The applicants/developers shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of 21 any of its:boards, commissions, agents, officers and employees from any claim, •<22 action or proceeding against the City, its boards, commissions, agents, officers or 23 employees to attack, set aside,.void or annul•the approval of the project when such . 24 claim or action is.brought within the time period provided for in applicable State 25 and/or local statutes. The City shall promptly notify the applicants/ developers of 26 any such claim, action or proceeding. The City shall coordinate in the defense. 27 Nothing contained in this condition shall prohibit theCity•from participating in a 23 defense of any claim, action, or proceeding if the' City bears its own attorney's 29 fees and costs, and the City defends the action in good faith.. 30 31 7. The operating liozirs.of the childcare center shall he reduced to 7.00 a.m. to 10.00 32 p.m. Monday through Saturday. 33 34 8. An 8-foot tall fence wall shall he installed on the north and east sides of the site to 35 mitigate. sound and light as required. The design of the fence/uunll shall be 36 .subject to SPARC review and approval. 37 38 9. The project shall use lighting Option No. 2 as developed by Winzler and Kelly m 39 the Illuminance Study and Photometric Report dated October 20, 2000: 40 41 10. An accrirate Master Schedule of Operations shall be submitted to the City prior to 42 or at the time of,SPARC.submittal. 43 • 44 11. The Salvation Army shall give priority to neighborhood children for up.to 25% of 45 the openings in the childcare center. 46 3 • • • • 1 12. The Salvation Army hay agreed to provide to the following prior 16 issuance of • 2 building permit: 3 4 • Plans to upgrade existing Chapel subject to review and approval of 5 SPARC. 6 • A letter to the City verifying they will not seek legal remedies under the 7 Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000. . • 8 • A letter agreeing to abide by all conditions andmitigation measures. 9 • . An agreement in writing to install the fences/walls necessary to attenuate 10 . oamd and light. 11 • A phone number with'24 hour access to address immediate concerns of the 12 neighbors. 13 • Documentation that Salvation Army personnel will occupy The single- 14 family:dwelling on the site (after the current lease expires).. 15 • - .Documentation that if the Commanding Officer at the Petaluma Center 16 changes, the Salvation Army will not make changes to or add any.social 17 services which are not listed ill,the Project Description or on the Master 18 Schedule of Operations 19 20 13. The applicants shall submit'an alternative site plan whereby the childcare center 21 - shall he relocated to the general area of the proposed social service, building and 22 the'social services building shall be-moved to the rear of the site The applicants • 23 shall also consider parking alternatives to increase the number of patkrng,spaces 24 on site The alternative design,shall be considered by the Planning Commission 25 prior to.SPARC submittal: 26 27 14. The sound/light mitigating fence/wall and the perimeter landscaping shall be 28 installed prior to issuance of building permits. 29 30 M.tigation,Measures 31 32 15. All earthwork, grading, trenching, back-filling and compaction operation shall be 33 conducted in accordance with the City's Grading and Erosion Control:Ordinance 34 (Title 7, Chapter 17.31, of the Municipal-Code 35 36 16. All public and/or'privateimprovements shall be-Subject to inspection by City staff . 37 for compliance with the approvedImprovement'Plans, prior-to City acceptance. 38 39 17. The applicant, shall submit an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan prepared by,a 40 registered professional engineer an as integral part of the grading plan. The Erosion 41 and Sediment Control Plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City 42 Engineer and Planning Director, prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The Plan shall include temporary erosion. control measures to be used during grading 44 operations at the site to prevent discharge of sediment and contaminants into the 45 drainage system. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall include the 46 following measures as applicable. 4 • 2 _ a. Material, and equipment for implementation of erosion control measures 3 shall be on —site by October 1'. All grading activity shall be eorripleted by 4 October. 15th, prior to the onset of the rainy season, with all disturbed areas 5 stabilized, and, if applicable, revegetated by October 31st. Upon'approval by 6 the Petaluma City Engineer, extensions for short-term grading may be 7 allowed. Special erosion control measures may be required by the City 8 Engineer in conjunction with any specially permitted rainy season grading. 9 10 18. All construction activities shall comply with the Uniform Building Code 11 regulations for seismic safety (i.e., reinforcing perimeter and/or load bearing 12 walls, bracing parapets, etc.). 13 14 The applicant shall incorporate the following Best Management Practices into the 15 construction and improvement plans and clearly indicate these provisions in the 16 • specifications. The construction contractor shall incorporate these measures into 17 the required erosion and sedinient plan to limit dust and exhaust emissions during 18 construction. 19 20 19. Grading and constructibn'equipment operated during construction activities shall be 21 properly muffled and maintained to minimize emissions. Equipment shall be 22 ' turned off when°not in use. • •23 24 20. Exposed soils -shall be watered periodically during construction, a minimum of 25 twice daily. The,frequency of watering shall be increased if wind speeds exceed 15 26 mph. Only purchased City water or reclaimed:water shall be used for this purpose. 27 Watering shall also occur on weekends and holidays when work is not in progress. 28 29 21. Construction sites involving earthwork' shall provide for a gravel pad area 30 consisting of an impermeable liner and drain rock at-the construction entrance to 31 clean mud and debris from construction vehicles prior to entering the public 32 roadways. Street surfaces_in the vicinity of the project shall be routinely swept and 33 cleaned of mud and dust carried onto the street by construction vehicles, 34 35 22. During,excavation activities, haul trucks used to transport soil shall utilize tarps or 36 other similar covering devices to reduce dust emissions. 37 38 23. Applicant shall.designate a person with authority to require increased watering to 39 monitor the dust and erosion control program. The name and phone number shall 40 be provided to the City of Petaluma prior to issuance of building permits. 41 42 24. This development shall be subject to the City's storm.drainage impact fees to.cover 43 the incremental impact/increase it will have on the City's storm drainage system. 44 • 45 25. All grading activity shall be completed prior to the onset of the rainy season. All 46 new drainage facilities shall be in place and in operation at that time. Grading.and 47 excavation activities shall not be permitted during the rainy season. Extensions for 5 1 grading and drainage facilities -work may be allowed in consultation with-the 2 Petaluma City Engineer, based on the sensitivity of the specific project area to 3 erosion, sedimentation, and;the,effectiveness of temporary•(rainy season),erosion 4 measures to be:implementedby'the applicant. 5 6 26. Plans,submitted at time of application for building permit shall include provisions - 7 for .storm water ;runoff management, The submittal shall reflect installation of 8 permanent signs at drop inlets, if any, to the public storm drain system, which 9 prohibit the deposit of hazardous materials into the system. 10 11 27. All construction activities shall be 'performed in a manner that minimizes the 12 sediment and/or pollutants entering directly or indirectly into the storm drain 13 system or ground water. The applicant shall incorporate the following provisions 14 into the construction plans and specifications, to be verified by •the Planning 15 Department, prior to issuance of grading or building permits: 16 17 a) The applicant shall designate on the improvement plans ,construction 18 staging areas and areas for the storage of any hazardous; materials (i.e., 19 motor oil,fuels, paints, etc.)to be used during construction Alf construction 20 staging areas shall be located away from any stream and adjacent;drainage 21 areas to prevent runoff from construction areas from entering into', the 22 drainage system Areas designated for storage of hazardous materials shall 23 include proper containment features to prevent contamination'from entering 2 • 4 drainage areas in the event ofa-spill'or leak . 25 26 b)No debris, soil, sand, cement, concrete, or washings thereof, or other 27 construction related,materials or wastes„soil or petroleum products or other 28 organic or earthen material,;shall be allowed to enter any drainage system. 29 All discarded material including washings and any accidental spills,shall be 30 removed and disposed of at an approved disposal site The applicant shall 31 designate appropriate'disposal methods and/or facilities on the construction 32 plans or in the specifications. 33 34 28. The applicant shall submit a 'detailed, grading and drainage plan for review and 35 approval by the City,Engineer and Planning Department prior to approval,of any 36 improvement plans or the issuance of a grading permit. Project grading and all 37 site drainage improvements shall be designed. and constructed in conformance 38 with the City of Petaluma Engineering Department's "Standard Specifications,” 39 and with the Sonoma County Water Agency's "Flood Control Design Criteria;" if 40 applicable Drainage plans shall include supporting calculations of storm drain 41 and culvert; size using acceptable engineering methods. No lot-to-lot drainage 42 shall be permitted. Surface runoff shall be addressed within each individual lot • 43 and then conveyed to an appropriate storm drain system: All hydrologic, 44 hydraulic, and storm drain system design, if applicable,.shall be subject to'review 45 and approval of the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA), and the City 46 .Engineer. 47 6 • • 1 29. All construction and operation activities shall comply with applicable z Performance Standards in.the:Petaluma Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code. 4 30. All construction activities shall be limited to 7:00 a.m-. to 6:00 p.m. Monday 5 through.Friday and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays: Construction shall be 6 prohibited on Sundays and all holidays recognized'by the City of Petaluma, unless 7 a permit is first secured from the City Manager (or his/her designee) for additional 8 hours. There will be no start up of machines nor equipment prior to 8:00 a.m., 9 Monday through,Friday;,no delivery of materials'nor equipment prior to 7:30 a.m. o nor past 5:00 p.m., 'Monday through Friday; no servicing of equipment past 6:45 11 p.m., Monday through Friday. 12 13 31. All construction equipment powered by internal combustion equipment shall be 14 properly muffled and maintained to minimize noise. Equipment shall be turned 15 off when not in use. 16 17 32. Construction maintenance,, storage, and staging areas,for construction equipment 1s shall avoid proximity to residential areas to the maximum extent practicable. 19 Stationary construction equipment, such as compressors, mixers, etc., shall be 2n placed away from residential areas and/or provided with acoustical shielding. 21. Quiet construction equipment shall be used when possible. 22 • 23 33. The applicant shall designate a Project Manager with authority to implement the 24 mitigation measures 'who will be responsible for responding,to any complaints from 25 the neighborhood,. prior to issuance of a building/grading permit. The Project 26 Manager shall determine the cause of noise complaints (e.g. starting too early, 27 faulty muffler, etc.) and shall take prompt action to correct the problem. 28 29 34. Optimize the site plan;to minimize adverse effects on the adjacent neighbors. Play 30 areas for preschoolers should be located' as faraway from the property line as 31 feasible and the use.of elevated play structures should be minimized. 32 33 35. If windows'are proposed`orithe:rear of the building adjacent to the residences, these 34 windows should:berkept closed during noisy indoor play periods. If complaints are 35 received, windows could be fixed closed. 36 37 36. Tf noise complaints due to outdoor play activity are.received from neighbors once 38 the center is in,operation, a secondary solid wood or masonry block wall shall be 39 built either around the play areas or parallel to the existing property line fences on .40 _ the Salvation Army side of the property line•to attenuate noise. These walls should • 41 be built to a height which will block the line of sight from the children in the play 42 areas to the rear yards or outdoor use areas of the residences, 43 44 37. All exterior lighting shall be directed onto the project site and access ways and 45 shielded to prevent glare and intrusion onto adjacent residential properties. Plans 46 submitted for project review and approval shall incorporate lighting plans, which 7 1 reflect the location and design,of all exterior lighting proposed. In no case shall the • 2 maximum illumination at ground level exceed 3 footcandle. 3 4 38. Shade trees shall be incorporated along.public streets and within parking areas in 5 conformance with the City's Site Plan and Architectural Review ,Guidelines to 6 reduce glare and provide shade and screening. 7 . . 8 39. Architectural detail, lighting,plans, landscaping plans, specifications on parking lot 9 layout and detailed site plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Site 10 Plan and Architectural Review Committee prior to issuance of building;permits. 11 12 40. Fixtures providing security lighting'shall be controlled by integral photocells, set-to 13 turn the fixture on from dusk to dawn=or when the light level failslelow;the preset 14 threshold..,All other fixtures shall be controlled by a universal 7-day time clock that 15 can be programmed for time of day operation. The lights shall be to turn off at 16 close of business. 17 18 41_ The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of the City's Traffic Mitigation 19 Fees. Traffic Mitigation Fees shall be calculated at the time pf issuance of a 20 building permit and shall be due and payable before final inspection or issuance of 21 a Certificate of Occupancy. 22 23 42. During non-working hours, open trenches and construction hazards within the • 24 public right-of-way shall be provided with signage, flashers,. and barricades 25 approved by the Street Superintendent to warn oncoming motorists;.bicyclists, and 26 pedestrians of potential safety hazards. 27 28 43. All road surfaces shall be restored to pre-project conditions after completion of any 29 project-related utility installation activities All-trench pavement restoration within 30 existing asphalt streets shall receive a slurry seal. 31 _ 32 44. Frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the city's Street 33 Standards to provide for safe access'to and from the site. Curb cuts, signing, and 34 striping, if applicable, shall be incorporated into the design as required by the 35 City's traffic Engineer. Improvement Or construction plans shall be subject to 36 review and approval of the Traffic Engineer prior to issuance of a grading or 37 building permit All street frontage improvements shall be constructed to City 38 standards and inspected by City Inspectors prior to final:inspections or acceptance 39 of improvements. • 40 41 45. Appropriate signs shall be installed,at the southerly driveway to prohibit outbound 42 left-turn movements onto McDowell Boulevard South. 43 • 44 46. The project shall be subject. to the payment of established City Special 45 Development Fees as applicable, including; Park and Recreation Land a 46 Improvements, Sewer and Water connection,.and'Traffic Mitigation as specified by 47 City Resolution. • 8 • 47. In order to ensure public safety and provide for police surveillance, all non- residential buildings and public use areas shall have security alarms and provide 4 motion orheat sensitive security lighting to parking areas,pedestrian pathways and 5 areas of concealment around the perimeter of each building. All parking areas and 6 pedestrian pathways shall provide visual access, to the extent practicable from 7 public streets and may require mirrors placed on an angle to be seen from the street 8 or public right-of-way'to.provide visual access to areas of potential concealment. 9 10 48. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide and 11 maintain current:emergency contact information on file at the Police Department. 12 13 .49. The project sponsor shall be required to pay for additional water and sewer 14 connections as established in the City's Special Development Fee handout. 15 16 50. Trenching for utilities andirrigation shall.be keptto as shallow a.depth as practical, 17 to avoid disturbing'potential:;subsurface resources. 18 19 51. For all construction activities, potential to uncover unknown archaeological 20 resources exist.. Should any artifacts, cultural remains, or potential resources be . 21 encountered during construction activities, work in;the:area of the find shall cease 22 and the construction contractor shall notify the Director of Planning. 23 Archaeological features include artifacts of stone, shell, bone, or other natural 24 materials. Association with artifacts includes hearths, house floors, and dumps. 25 Historic artifacts'potentially include all by-products of human land use,greater than 26 50 years of age. Human burials, if encountered,. require the notification of the 27 County Coronerin addition to the monitoring archaeologist. The City shall consult 28 with qualified cultural_resource specialist to evaluate the find. If the suspected 29 remains are determined to be potentially significancall`work in the vicinity shall be 30 halted until mitigation measures are incorporated into the design, or the removal of 31 the resource has been accomplished in accordance with recommendations by the 32 archaeologist. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation recommendations of 33 the archaeologist prior to commencing work in the vicinity of the archaeological 34 find. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs.associated with consulting a 35 cultural resource specialist and with implementation of mitigation measures. 36 37 52. The applicant shall be required to obtain all required permits from responsible 38 agencies and provide proof of compliance to the City prior to issuance of grading 39 or building permits or approval of improvement plans. 40 41 53. The applicant !shall incorporate all applicable code proyisions and required 42 rnitigation measures and conditions into the design and improvement plans and 43 specifications for the project. 44 45 54. The, applicant shall notify all employees, contractors, and agents involved in the 46 project implementation of the mitigation rneasures'and conditions applicable to the 9 1 project and shall ensure compliance with such measures and conditions. Applicant 2 shall notify all assigns and transfers of the same. _ • 3 4 55. The applicant shall designate a project manager with authority to implement all 5 mitigation measures and conditions of approval and provide name, address, and 6 phone numbers to the City prior to issuance of any grading permits and signed by - 7 the contractor responsible for construction. • 8 9 56. Mitigation measures required during construction shall be listed as conditions on to the building or grading permits and signed by the contractor responsible for 11 construction. 12 13 From the Bicycle Advisory Committee: 14 15 57. A total of five covered bicycle parking places shall be provided throughout the to development. 17 18 58. One shower and five clothes lockers shall be provided for employees' use. 19 20 59. Exterior seating at benches/tables for a minimum of 10 persons shall be provided 21 (calculated.at twice the amount of.:required bicycle parking). This seating shall also 22 serve as an outdoor eating'spaceforemployees. 23 •24 60. The owners/lessees shall provide a simple one-page document to the.Citynvning a • 25 'designated ``transportation coordinator" and describing specific incentives for 26 employees and customers to walk/bicycle to the facility thereby encouraging 27 alternatives to driving cars to this facility. Examples include lending-bicycles for 28 short errands, monetary or other rewards for not driving, etc This{documentation 29 shall be received by the City prior to issuance of the Certificateof-'Occupancy. 30 31 61. The development shall_have on-site facilities for food storage, preparation and 32 eating accessible to all employees of all buildings. 33 34 62. Under no circumstances-should'any'pesticide/herbicide be applied:in areas used.by 35 pedestrians/bicyclists anywhere in this project or the surrounding area without 36 appropriate signage. 37 38 1. This project shall utilize Best Management Practices regarding pesticide/herbicide 39 use and fully commit to Integrated Pest Management techniques for the protection 40 . of bicyclists and pedestrians. • 41 42 From the Engineering Department: 43 44 64. A 10-foot wide right-of-way dedication to the City of Petaluma is;required for the 45 100-foot long portion of parcel street frontage. 46 10 • t 65. _ An executed private storm drain easement grant deed shall be obtained from the 2 adjacent existing Petaluma Ecumenical Project (PEP) development (APN 007-570- 3 029) located southeasterly of the proposed project. Note: A letter of,intent dated 4 12/21/00 to enter offer the above-mentioned "easement.from PEP to the Salvation 5 Army is on file with the City of Petaluma Community Development Department. 6 7 66. Hydrology calculations for the proposed and existing storm drain system shall be 8 submitted to the Engineering Section for review. Additionally, the calculations 9 should indicate that the existing storm drain facilities:located on the PEP project are to hydraulically capable of handling the increase in peak storm water runoff based on 11 the proposed site development. Sonoma County Water Agency standards should be 12 used to perform the analysis. 13 14 67. All portions of broken, cracked or otherwise damaged sidewalk or driveway 15 _ approaches located along the entire parcel frontage shall be replaced. 16 17 68. An excavation permit is required for all work within the public right-of-way 18 including sidewalks, driveway approaches, water'supply and sewerage installations, 19 etc. 20 21 69. All existing subsurface wastewater disposal,systems and septic tanks, if any, shall 22 be removed per County of Sonoma Department of Environmental Health standards. 23 24 70. All work within the public-right-of-way shall conform.to=the City of Petaluma latest 25 standards, codes, policies, etc. 26 27 71. Lot to lot surface drainage and concentrated drainage of public sidewalks shall not 28 occur. 29 30 From the Water Department: 31 32 72. The contractor shall submit GPM requirements needed for water connections. The 33 project will require a minimum of 1" service for domestic and minimum I" service 34 for irrigation. 35 36 From the Fire Marshal: (To avoid requests for subsequent submittals, please show or note 37 all Fire Department requirements on plans submitted,for building permit.) 38 39 CHILDCARE BUILDING: 40 • 41 73. The building shall_be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system-as,required by 42 the Uniform Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm monitoring, 43 which will°notify the Fire Department in the event of water flow. In addition, a • 44 local alarm shall be provided on the exterior and interior of the building. 45 11 1 74. 'Fire alarm system shall te:connected to a central station monitor that will notify the 2 fire department in the event-of an alarm. •_ 3 4 75. This facility:requires an annual Fire Department permit for a commercial childcare 5 facility. The permit fee is $60.00 per year and.is due prior to occupancy approval 6 and/or operation. 7 8 76. This facility shall meet the requirements in the 1998 California Uniform Fire.Code 9 Article 10 and in FPA 72. 10 L1 NEW CHAPEL AND EXISTING CHURCH: 12 13 77. Provide a KNOX BOX for Fire Department access. KNOX BOX shall contain keys 14 or access codes to buildings. 15 16 78. All curtains, drapes, hangings or other decorative material shall be flame retardant 17 or'treated-with an approved fire retardant chemical by a licensed State Fire,Marshal 18 Applicator. 19 20 79. This business requires an annual Fire Department permit for Places of Assembly of 21 less than 300. The permit fee of$60.00 is due prior to occupancy approval and/or 22 operation. 23 •24 80. • The buildings shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system •as required 25 by the Uniform Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm 26 monitoring,, which will notify the Fie Department in the event of Water flow. In 27 addition,.alocal alarm shall be provided on the exterior and,interior of the building. 28 29 81. A permit is required from the Fire marshal for the installation or alteration'of a fire 30 sprinkler system prior to the commencement of work. A minimum of two'sets of 31 plans with calculations is required to be submitted for review and approval. 32 33 82. Contractors installing underground fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and 34 submit two sets of plans for approval prior to commencing work. A-hydrostatic test 35 of 200 psi for two hours is required'prior.to backfill. All joints shall be:visible at 36 time of inspection. Underground installations.,shall be flushed to Fire Department 37 satisfaction prior to connection to overhead. NOTE: Civil utility plans and/or other 38 plans approved, or not, will not be'.accepted in lieu of the above requirement. 39 • • 40 83. Contractors shall -obtain iPetaluma City Water Department approval prior to 41 charging onsite underground water mains. 42 43 84. All contracts shall have a City business license and a workers' compensation 44 certificate on file with'the Fire Marshal's office. 45 12 • • 1 85. Provide an approved automatic fire extinguishing system to protect all cooking • 2 equipment. _ 4 86. Fixed fire extinguishing systems shall be installed by a licensed contractor. 5 Contractor shall obtain the required permit from, and submit two sets of plans for 6 review by, the Fire :Marshal. Systems are subject to testing and inspection by the 7 Fire Marshal's office prior to acceptance. 8 9 87. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor, which will notify to the Fire Department in the event of an alarm. 11 12 88. All required fire lanes, in which no parking is allowed, shall be designated by 13 painting curbs red. Where no curbs exist, signs approved by the Fire Marshal shall 14 be installed. 15 16 89. No combustible construction above the foundation is allowed unless an approved 17 asphalt surfaced road is provided to within 150 feet of the furthest point of a 18 structure and the fire hydrants have been tested, flushed,.and are in service. 19 20 90. Install fire hydrants every 300 lineal feet. No structure orFire Department sprinkler 21 connection shall be in excess of 150 feet from a fire Hydrant. 22 23 SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING: 24 • 25 91. The building shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as required 26 by the Uniform Fire Code and shall be provided with central station alarm 27 monitoring, which will notify the Fire Department in-the event of water flow. In 28 addition, a local alarm shall be provided on the exterior and interior of the 29 building. 30 31 92. Contractors installing underground fire sprinkler mains shall obtain a permit and 32 submit two sets of plans for approval prior to.commencing work. A hydrostatic test 33 of 200 psi for two hours is required prior to backfill. All.joints shall be visible at 34 time of inspection. Underground installations shall be flushed to Fire.Department 35 satisfaction prior to connection to overhead. NOTE: Civil utility plans and/or other 36 plans approved, or not, will not be accepted in lieu of the above requirement. 37 38 93. Contractors shall obtain Petaluma City Water Department approval prior to 39 charging onsite underground water mains. 40 . 41 94. All contracts shall have a City business license and a workers' compensation 42 certificate omfile with the Fire Marshal's office. • 43 44 95. Fire alarm system shall be connected to a central station monitor that will notify 45 the Fire Department in the event of an alarm. 46 13 1 96. This plan has been reviewed with the .information supplied; subsequent plan 2 submittal for review may be subject to additional requirements as plans are • 3 revised. 4 5 From the Transit Coordinator: 6 7 97. A. transit stop sign (provided by the City), pole and bench per the attached 8 specifications shall be installed at the existing bus stop. 9 10 11 12 I hereby certify the foregoing. Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Planning 13 •Commission.of the City of Petaluma at a regular meeting on the 10th day of April, 2001, 14 by the following vote: 15 16 AYES: O'Brien, Monteschio, Glass, Broad, Barrett, Vouri 17 18 NOES: 19 20 ABSENT: Vieler 21 22 ATTEST: DATED:. 23 Gary Broad, Planning Commission Chair • 24 .25 Stc resdsalvationarmy • • • 14 E, Clank-(-koMpsovt ` 8 April'2001 • Dear City Council Members, We urge theiCity Council to overturn the March 27 approval. of the Salvation Army project. This large commercial project, s611- it') tpepiddle of residential neighborhood, would violate both the Petaluma.(3eheraf Plan and zoning laws. Three major problems stand out, each one sufficient reason to stop the project: 1 ) Hours of operation. Staff and the Salvation,Army have cited the need for after-hours child care. The General Plan does too, but its solution is not to subject a suburban neighborhood to late-hour commercial activity— instead, it notes that the facilities'for after-hours child care already exist, in the form of schools. See page 63, objective (v), which is to "Encourage use of public'school sites for before and after-school child care." Also, on page 59 of the.General Plan, objective (g) is to "Maximize the extended use of existing public facilities for.year- round and evening use." And, see page 1.23 of the General Plan, which requires the City to "minimize the amount of noise that future development creates and the amount of noise to which theecommunity is exposed." Note how the slamming of dozens of car doors until well after 10PM conflicts with this goal. 2) Parking. Only by a,25%;reduction in the number of spaces required and an adjustment to the expected number of peopleon site can the parking be considered sufficient. In reality; the neighborhood will fill up with parking overflow. Susan.Zanotti, in her remarks to the Planning Commission on March 27, showed how an entire segment of visitors to the site had been ignored in the parking calculations, namely the many who will show up to pick up and drop off the 80 children who will be on-site at the same time. (Attachment #1) The Planning Commission found this fact inconvenient, and chose to ignore it. This Council should not. 3) Then there's the warehouse, which is clearly illegal, per 6-401, which says "...NOT including warehouses and similar uses." At the February 13 meeting, Ms Lewitter said that the warehouse wasn't really a warehouse because it was under a certain, arbitrary size. When that didn't work, staff had the city attorney prepare a convoluted opinion that attempts to justify the illegal warehouse. We think you'll agree that the opinion of our attorney, coming as it does from a background of real-estate specialization, makes more sense. Both attorneys' opinions are attached. (Attachment # 2) Allowing this warehouse to be built would undermine the credibility of the City's government. e»,' cop vu e ,$EEN RE /01 - Nr 6 In addition to the three red-flag items above, therest of the project proposal consists of loose ends. In their haste to push this project through, the Planning Commission left open such basic issues as what will be done on the property and where the buildings will be And even some things that we think ore agreed upon are not yet in writing. While we applaud the Planning Commission for raising the possibility,of moving the buildings about (a suggestion the Salvation Army rejected when we brought it up last year), we think that until this is decided, any approval'is- premature indeed. Also, we still don't know exactly what the.'Salvation Army intends to use the property for--on February 13, the Planning Commission asked fora complete Master Schedule of Operations. At the March 27 meeting, not only had this not been done, but at least one use_was missing, numbers of participants'were,at odds with,the.City's memorandum, and typos regarding hours of operation-had even been carried forward from earlier versions. According to Ms Lewitter's testimony at the March 27 meeting, the discrepancy between the Master Schedule,of Operations and the March 27 Memorandum as to the number of people at the site on Saturdays for 'Community Use' was the result of a phone conversation; staff andlthe:Salvation Army needed to revise the estimated number of people on site downwards, we assume because they realized at the last minute that their parking space numbers didn't add up. So: What other uses and changes have been agreed- upon by staff and the Salvation Army, that nobody else is aware of?. . At the March 27 meeting, the Planning Commission members were clearly unsure of what it was exactly that they were agreeing to do. We:certainly don't know where we stand in terms of public comment and input: We ask the City Council to review the tape of the final half-hour or so, and determine what the actual status of this project is. With all this up in the air; any approval of this project is quite premature. We ask that the council disallow this project. If, despite the'wishes of the more than 200 neighbors Who have signed petitions saying they don't want this project built (see attachment 3), you decide to go ahead with it,it should be sent back to the Planning Commission with instructions to make the fallowing.changes: 1 ) The warehouse should'be:removed from the project. Not only is it illegal, per 6 401, but the slamming of its large doors would be a major source.of`noise (which is one reason it's illegal), and it would.contribute to the loss of property • values in the'neighborhood. la) Removal of the'warehoUse would reduce the financial impact of this project. Theacity attorney advised the Planning Commission that they didn't have to consider the loss of value in terms of environmental impact. This does not mean that the Council may not consider it. (The loss of value has,been documented. See attachment #5 in the packet for the March 27 Planning • Commission meeting.) • Since the Warehouse is wrong for so many reasons (noise, traffic, financial •' impact, legal liability for the City), it should be removed from the project. The only reason we've heard for its"being at this site is for convenience of the Salvation Army...we think the City Council should also consider the neighborhood's convenience. • • 2) The hours of operation for the child care should be scaled back to TAM to 6 PM. Any resistance from staff and the Salvation Army should be answered by referring them to pages 59 and 63 of the General Plan. 3) Conditional Uses should be spelled out. As Susan Zanotti pointed out to the Planning Commission on;March27, conflicts between.the`Memorandum and the Master Schedule of'Operations exist. These should'be,resolved. Oral agreements that give precedence to one document over another should no longer take the place of proper staff work. Each and every use of the site, the hours proposed and the number of people expected should be included. 4) The Planning Commission, on March 27, spoke of including Mr Hoover's spoken promises as part of the CUP. This should be done;and not allowed to fall through the cracks. Some of these issues are listed below,,others may exist only • on the tape of the March 27 meeting. 4a) Mr Hoover said at the March 27 meeting that the Salvation Army would not invoke RLUIPA—we want this in writing as part of any CUP. 5) Noise mitigation measures should be finalized. Some of the following items need to be worked out via a mediator (see # 17 below) and some have already been agreed upon, but will not show up in the CUP unless you insist upon it. A) The sound wall: We need assurance that'll`will be built before construction starts. A.mediator will help answer such questions as: What would it be made of? How tall would it be? Where will it be in relation to the property lines? Who will maintain it? What measures will be taken to protect trees/ tree roots along the property line? B) Construction hours need to be scaled back. They should be 7AM to 4:30 PM on weekdays, with no weekend or holiday construction. Page 123 of the General Plan recommends limiting construction hours, but our neighborhood • would, according to the March 27 Memorandum, be,subjected to 62'hours per week of it. C) Move the child care building and outdoor play areas away-from the back fences of those who live on Sarkesian and Park Lane. This would place them nearer to the PEP' buildings, but we've been told many times that the people who live there support the project and do not object to the noise. D) Truck routes for delivery should be designated, per the General Plan, page 111. No idling of motors should be allowed on delivery vehicles at the site. No deliveries should be allowed past 5 PM. • • E) Replacement of neighbors' windows. Use of dual-paned windows can be a significant noise mitigation measure. Our research shows that Milgard dual- • paned laminated argon-filled windows block noise most effectively.The Salvation Army should pay for replacement of windows on the houses most affected. Replacement should.'be done before construction starts. F) No outdoor amplified music should be used on the site;:this.needs to be in the CUP. - G) Mr Hoover says that only electric forklifts will be used in and around the warehouse— If the warehouse is to exist at all, electric forklifts should be required in the-CUP. • H) We were told the playgrounds would not have high climbing structures, which would defeat the sound walk. But at the March 27 Planning Commission meeting, there was still talk of climbing structures. This rnust.be addressed in.the CUP. I) Warehouse door should.:be-raised and lowered only between the hours of 9AM and 5PM, andthis'should.be in the CUP. J) Mr'Hoover says only electric leaf-blowers will be used at the, site. This • should be in the CUP. 6) This project runs afoul of page 111 of the General Plan, regardingthrough- traffic in residential neighborhoods. On February 13, Mr Vouri asked that the traffic engineer suggest ways to prevent cross-cutting. This then "fell through the cracks" as one Planning Commission member told us andwas not mentioned • at the.March 27 meeting. It should be looked at before.the project is approved. Also, the traffic study carefully avoids the issue of the danger of accidents in front of the site and at the Caulfield/ South McDowell intersection. 7) Parking: We can suggest no remedy for this one, until such time as the Master Schedule of-Operations is completed. We note, however, that the parking and building placement issues immediately improve when you remove the warehouse from the plan. On February'13, Mr Broad expressed concern that the parking"would be inadequate, but the Planning Commission then seemed to lose interest in the issue, even when we showed th ern that traffic was certain to back up into South McDowell, as parents double-parked.at the site for pick-up and drop-off. In any case, the 25% reduction should be-disallowed; it's based on the idea of no overlap in uses, wheras Ms Zanotti, on March'27, demonstrated that child care pick-up dnd drop-off creates overlap and results in too few spaces. • 8) Parking lot security: We think the lot should have a gate which would be • locked when the site is not in use. 9) Lighting: We think the parking lot should be dark when the site is not in use. At the March 27 meeting, the lighting consuitant said a timer would be used to keep-the lights on all night. • 10) If construction is to proceed in stages, we want thestart and completion •, dates clearly spelled out in the CUP. Construction should not be allowed to stcrt until the Salvation Army has all the funding in place. 11 ) Planting of trees and building of sound walls should be done before construction starts.Trees should not be planted close enough to the walls as to allow children to climb over them. - 12) Use of kitchens: We want the CUP to spell out when the kitchens will be used and by whom. (We've heard vague and contradictory answers, which raises the question, When does a 'church kitchen' become a'soup kitchen?') 13) Showers should be'for employees only, and this should be in the CUP. 14) Neighborhood input into the aesthetics of the buildings that face McDowell should be arranged. 15) At the Febuary 13 meeting we mentined the presence of old septic tanks on the site, and requested a soilstudy. This seems to be another thing that is "falling through the cracks," to Use.a Planning Commission member's words. It shouldn't be allowed to. • 16) We've been told thatrthe Fire.Marshall and Bundling Department had no concerns about this project: As it is not yet known where the buildings will be, we find this hard to beleive, and would ask that'the City Council direct the Planning Commission to be sure that the setbacks from assumed property lines are reviewed by the Chief Building Official. 17) If this project is to go forward in.any form, a mediator should be appointed to help work out the many details that come up when trying to fit a commercial operation into a residential neighborhood. The Planning Commission asked us to meet with the Salvation Army, and we've tried to do that. But the Salvation Army's stance has been that what happens on their side of the fence is none of our business. Some of the issues area simple, have simple solutions, and could be easily worked out. But first the Salvation Army needs a reason to do so. • You might well wonder why staff hasn't written addressed many of the neighborhood's'concerns. So do we. • • • • When this started, we thought that staff's job was to iron out differences and make sure laws were obeyed. Instead, staff has acted as agents of the Salvation Army, ignoring the existing neighborhood's needs and rights, while attempting to twist zoning laws so as to expedite the project. When we asked Ms Lewitter about enforcing conditions of use we were told that because of RLUIPA, the City would not and.could not enforce them, and advised us to "trust them." Now that the Eastside Neighborhood Alliance (ENA) has gotten the Salvation Army to agree not to invoke'RLUIPA, potentially saving the City endless expense and trouble, staff can't even be bothered to have them out it in writing. Our neighborhood, and Petaluma, deserve better. The City Council should kill this ill-advised project. And if-it doesn't, the. City should show some consideration for the taxpayers and voters who would have to share the neighborhood with it. Now would be a good time fbr it to start doing so. Scot Steele; 204,LaL, • Susan Zanotti: for the Eastside Neighborhood Alliance Scot Steele 1420 Sa;kesian Drive Petaluma, 01194954 • • • • hi27,2001 Planning Commission members; vtarc The March,27 Memorandum and its attachments are full of discrepancies and numbers that don't add up. Take, for instance, the"Revised Proposed Master Scheduleof Operations." (Attachment 10.) It says that on Saturdays between the hoursof'10 AM and 5 PM, 80 people maximum may be onsite for "Community Use."But the March 27-Memorandum says, on lines 31 and 32 of page 5, that the Saturday hours of Community Use are 12 Noon'to 6PM with a maximum of;100-125 people. . And, consider the Saturday child care program that, according to theProposed Master Schedule, has 8-10 adults,though the Traffic Engineer's study(attachment 8) conveniently uses the lower number. Also, consider the traffic analysis that selects Saturday as the"worst case scenario" to show that parking is OK with the 25°A reduction. It says that 38 spaces are needed for the church, and',8 for the employees with 4 left in reserve:,However, it neglects to mention the extra2 employees if the day care is at maximum capacity...and,the:3-spaces reserved for residential use as per page 5, line 35 of the Memorandum dated March 27. Noc.does it take into account the 5 spaces that will be required for the warehouse, since replenishment;happens on Saturday mornings. So, add it up. Fifty six-. And on Saturday, the buildings are to be cleaned and maintained: The Proposed Master Schedule doesn't say how many people will be needed to do that, so who knows how many parking spaces are really needed?Obviously, staff must,,since they've decided that a 25%reduction in parking spaces is OK. Actually;there se.bigger problem than the above: There's a whole group of people visiting the site who will need parking spaces that have been ignored-- those who are picking children up and dropping them off. We expect thatthe explanation will be that they will'just.be there long enough to pick up or drop off, and so don't need to be counted in the parking demand.. But with up to 80 children on site, • I think you can expect that they will arrive and leave in clusters. And proper use of car seats demands a couple of minutes. Where will they park when the 50 parking:spaces are filled with 56 or more cars?How many cars can double-park on the site? This problem'can even overwhelm the site on weekdays, with no church activity: On Tuesday at 5PM, there would be 10 adults for child care still on site, with their shift just ending. Six adults for the extended day care would be showing,up, and the,shifts would overlap-somewhat--,that's 16 spaces used up. So far, so good: But only if nobody shows up to drop off or pickup children. Assume'that 20 cars show up to pick up children from the day care,not a large number, as"there might'be'60 children there. That's 20 more spaces used°:up,at least for a'short time. About then, 13 families drop off the maximum of 40 children for the extended day care. That's 13 more spaces used up, So, 16 +20+ 13 =49, Oops, don't forget the 3 spaces needed for residents.Now were up to 52 spaces,and this assumes that all people on the site for Community Use and Social Services are off the site by the time stated—3 PM. And don't forget,the5 spaces needed for the adults to care for-up to 20 children in the after- school program (a use mentioned on page 1, line 35 of the March 27 Memorandum, but conveniently left out of the Proposed Master Schedule of Operations.) So,on Tuesdays at 5;PM, 57 of the 50 spaces will be used up. And what will happen to the traffic on McDowell, as parents are double-parked and the driveway to the site backs up?The more you look at the nuts and bolts of how this site.would,work,the worse staff's 25%reduction looks. I urge you to nor approve this:project. It doesn't fit,at o In closing, I'm giving you a petition signed by T6$Petaluma residents-who do not approve of this project. It's not-just a few who live in on Sarkesian Drive.and Park Lane who are opposed. We have signatures from residents on Pacific Ave, Lombardi Ave, South McDowell Blvd,Ramona Lane, Teresa Court, Marian Way, Daniel Drive, Tanager Street, Cottage Court,Trellis Lane, Crinella Drive, Colwood Drive, Weaverly Drive, Ivy Lane, Glenwood Drive, Tamar Drive,Pheasant Street; Pinewood Court, Raven Way, Robin Way;Madrone Lane,Meadowlark, Sierra, Carlin Court,Cerro Sonoma Circle and Birnam Wood Court. • Susan Zanotti 1420 Sarkesian Drive had/1te4 1 LAW OFFICES OF GAGEN, MCCOY, MCMAHON & ARMSTRONG WILLIAM E. GAGEN, JR. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION GREGORY L. DANVILLE OFFICE MCCOY PATRICK J. MCMAHON 279 FRONT STREET MARK L. ARMSTRONG 'P. O. BOX 2115 DANVILLE, CALIFORNIA 945 LINN K:'COOMSS IB STEPHEN W. THOMAS TELEPHONE: 1925183]-0 FAX; 19251836-5985 CHARLES A. KOSS n MICHAEL J, MARKOWITZ RICHARD C. RAINES NAPA VALLEY OFFICE VICTOR J. CONTI - THE"OFFICES AT SOUTHBRICGE BARBARA DLVAL JEWELL March 26, 2001 1030 MAIN:STREET ,SUITE 212 ROBERT M. FANUCCI • _ ST. HELENA-CALIFORNIA 94574 ALLAN C. MOORE .. TELEPHONE: 17071 963-0909 PATRICIA E. CVRTIN • FAX 1]0]1:963-5527 STEPHEN T. BUEHL AMANDA BEVINS PLEASE REPLY TO ALEXANDER L,:SCHM10 ANDREW 5: GUSTAFSON MARTIN LYSO N5' D3l1 VIIC CEL'IA N. PSIM Planning Commissibn Members Community Development Department Planning Division 11 English"Street Petaluma, CA 94952 Hand Delivered Re: Project'File No. CUP00014 Neighborhood Concerns WithProposed;Salvation Army Development • Dear Commissioner: • Our firm has been retained to represent Dr-:Richard Bush of 716 Park Lane,'which,abuts the proposed Salvation Army site, and the East.Petaluma Neighborhood Alliance,an infoinial group of concerned neighbors. Like most infill projects in residential.neighborhoods, the proposed Salvation Army project poses a number'of concerns, both"with Dr, Bush and the Alliance. Most of the neighbors .recognize that the project will add.significantly to the services available to the City of Petaluma as awhole. We also appreciate-the-efforts by the City and the applicantssto accommodate the neighborhood's concern. --However, one issue still remains: we are opposed to allowing the proposed warehouse facility,to be operated on site The warehouse, which is not allowed under the.current zoning of the subject property, will have significant impacts on the surrounding properties and their owners' quality of life. By this letter, we are requesting that, if the Commission approves the proposed Salvation Army project, the approval should not include the proposed warehouse facility. The project statement includes among theproposed uses a 2306 square-foot"storage facility" for emergency disaster relief and palletized-food supplies. By all definitions; this proposal is for a warehouse. However, this site is in the R-1-6,500 zoning district, which,specifically excludes warehouses from=its allowable uses. Section 6-401 of the Zoning Ordinance allows "Public and quasi-public buildings and uses of educational, religious; cultural, or'public F:\CLMEL\33331\Planning Commission Letter 032601.wpd 194-facA'Me4- 2 September 15, 2000 • Page 2 service nature, but not including:corporation yards, storage or repair yards, and warehouses and similar uses." In her memorandum to the.Planning Commission, Betsi Lewitter, Project Planner,cites the City Attorney's opinion regarding the storage use (page 2,lines 45-45; page 3, lines 1-3). He states that zoning uses are categorized "according to their primary use and that such categories assume and permit,a variety of ancillary and related uses." However, one must adopt a very broad definition of word"ancillary"to include palletized food storage as an ancillary use Unlike the single-family homeowners who use portions of their property for storage of personal items;,this warehouse facility by its size and nature intensifies the use of the property and impacts the surrounding neighbors. The Zoning Ordinanbe•prohibits warehouses in the residential R-1 District for a.reason: the additional traffic, noise, and activity created on the site •are not compatible with quiet enjoyment of residential property. The proposed storage facility is quite large and will attract a significant number of people to the site, either to stock:the facility or to draw from it In addition, the extra lighting and security concerns associated with the facility make the • warehouse an incompatible use with the surrounding residences. We urge the Commission to deny the warehouse.onthe proposed site in accordance with the City of Petaluma's Zoning Ordinance. Sincerely, GAGEN,McCOY,McMAHON&ARMS IRONG A Professional.Corporation O Martin E. Lysons • cc: Betsi Lewitter,Project Planner • r F:\CLMEL\33331\PIanning Commission Letter 032601.wpd Planning Commission y Conditional U Re: Salvation Arm . March 12, 2001 Use Permit • Page 3 • • (2) That !knifing the operation of the project will further a-compelling interest of the City, • (3) That any conditions imposed would be the least restrictive;means available to protect the identified compelling interest: 2- Storage Use You have asked whether the'proposed 2;300 sq. feet of storage area—to beused for storing supplies for emergency disaster relief •families, and for parking a mobile,food canteen van—is palletized,food supplies for distribution to"needy category, which conditionally permits i allowed under the applicable zoning This category y p rmits"°educational,xehgious; cultural,'or public services" uses. ry specifically excludes storage warehousing,and similar uses: Therefore; it'appears that the proposed use.is allowed under the City's Zoning Ordinance. . Zoning uses are typically categon Zed according to theirprim u assume and permit a variety of ancillary assume who store boxes of o h r and'related uses ,Thus, for example,p, single family home' the prohibition store box s o photographs in their garage will not be considered•" the storage uses inR-1 districts, because storing old photos considered edn of ancillary to the single family us Likewise, in the.present instance, storage,offood items disaster relief supplies and'vehicles, an like, appear to be;incidental or ancillary to the Salvation Army's.primaryuse of the property foreducational, religious, cultural, and other • quasi- public tegory.doses Therefore, the project appears to be.consistent with the applicable zoning 3. Scope of Initial Study Ycu have asked whether the alleged loss y values that may result fiom approve of the project must be considered in the preparation of the initial study required by the California, Environmental_Quality Act("CEQA") prom the information you have provided thus-far;we think the answer is no. ''CEQA and its implementing guidelines snake:it clear that social.and economic effects,are not to be considered a si they to relevant r a significant ep it change effect`and need be considered only to the.extent icantenvironme the see reevant to are ticlpate l physical change in the environment or, E b antiatevi soce change,re y likely to result in , on the ro basis f asrsuch regarded as a.sange ant c change in the entiiroriinentbut:ma ' may be regarded•as a significant chap y be considered if they associated with.a physical change. .in the Because the purpose of an initial study is to deterrr,ine whether a project mighthave a significant effect on the environment it is limited CO identifying direct physical impacts on the February 24, 2001 Petition to the City 61 Petaluma Planning Commission Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City He Number: CUP00014 The fooling: of t` : resident, living in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the Gity:of.Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. W h- •f h- n- .h.a. yd . sIn• rte. I • express our dlsOleasure.in aeceiittina the proposed oroiect, We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood, fora variety of reasons. 1: This is-a,residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection; or interest, in a sense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic generated by'this expansion. 3. We do not want daily business-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. a r .•'•• ! t! ••• • • -.. ..r.. - • 9 ' er. :.r. .a.. h• ., v. q! V . t•. expand and redesign the Property at 721 So. McD well Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 Printed Name/u' �� Sianah!re l Address _. :.y l;di 9 e'-%7Ct ke/t TY1 a / gZL. • Z� (A1',7/. nG� :// /i> < (/ Dar—: C 4-727 Prltn?ed Na �• Signature ' • Address b ii e 1 . t5y ate: 34 Jct. Printed Na - _ Ian ♦ r- Address RSS f l l r . • 7}-HackMe c-t 3 • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721:So. McDowell Blvd., PetalUma,,C4 94954 • "Printed Namei')z�GS D. e: - S it .t ro At!...-(--/•-:- i � i c / p Printed:Name Z • Z - , ien. . i cr.: -( ®r, A.rr ' ! . c l Printed Name •;t-: (� OJ 5i n.1 r /= "G . .. i c x hits ) A r= C LI PC( V 6C,2• y c/6/ %.S '�.� Y • Printed Name .. ': ;> Z�f 0 ion? :r- (\, A. r..c 611 , t �I X111! q t' Printed Na fh: -: (., iY� D.Printed Name .n t r i / "..c....______-- ' m e—! :-Gi .Y/%J. • . • February 24, 2001 Petition to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number: CUP00014 The feelings of the residents, living in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the-City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve; or deny the proposed project. On that date,a final decision was put on hold. We, the residents of the-neighborhood surrounding the McDowell site, wish to express our displeasure in accepting the proposed prolect. We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood, for'a.variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection, or interest; in a sense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic generated by this.expansion. 3. We do not want dailybusiness-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value: We,the undersigned, DO NOT approve of the proposal by the Salvation Army to expand and redesign the;property.at 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma! CA 954 S �q i i J JAo.6, Date: .q— a/ — 0/ Printed Name v/ signature Jo .t� 2 3 J J Address es'I 3,ri; d> Cr 3, 45?.. uini4) /,)J 1.L1 / M J. C046./L Date: —al—D/ Printed Name signature 7yJc, • Address $ 4 6.�uix'ti AD/ i.iPO c i r G S Date: '3 0 / — d 1 Printed Name • • /0 - Sicnature Address 87-0 C2; r. • Petition, City of Petaluma,Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954: Lill ay g e-T, OlS Date: �i— i-6( Printed'Name Signature 9 ck,2_,(AAt . J Address cc O C4-1•14 f 8 G Tr. ii/? ,R Kx v. Z. sc,n (- - Date: 3 -[2/-cil Printed Name Signature- j,f✓rrn , �/ .:�c.� Address r V ( 4 .',-ro. !C-.• OK i _RYc r e I Y X Date: 3)- t-I -0I Printed Name Signature L.A.._ Address /(6 Ott r�0 ,( (Cr . Cr . . I. • Viic-11nts ` m onnhi- Date: ,�• q -OI Printed Nam Signature i_� Address F5( (ri Cr i in-ell r. ajHDOCVA_ -tfno r - 171 Date: l RI 0 I Printed`Nam- aSs \ , Address ' 6 ' i ' .. l Y� ., `" 1 V\A_.. .tiuP_� Date: 3 1/1---- /` Printed Name Si.natur y •�• �� Address F'1 - . • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma,CA.94954 t ( � I �I aI✓/� S Date: '3, 9/01 • Printed Name Signature Address 1 I Z9 + - ,Aq Z A EiD r)i-R90 Date: 3. �/ 0 / Printed Name Signature vi C.-f'"c�✓jrin Address TS 1-5) ,) Cl�7�zCa�� 1).1- Date: Printed Name • Signature Address /S ?(L' /h r G 1^ Pt , 1. . EGA N Date: 1/°/Dl Printed Name Signature ''2 LY Address /`1 • oc � ,vA E w Date: 3 / 10( 6( Printed Name Signature _ • Address / 4 6 .3 ( V `J LA / • a,,} Date: 3 0 / Printed Name I /4/(f? Signature, � • Addr�S , 1S1 � 24 A)r;'GAz t�' �1(L & Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion.and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954., • m 2 E 1 = Date: - ICY-8- O Printed Name • Signature OOpIN`)�1 Address. p I \RP� � r LureNC\ 1 '-r Date: Printed Name Signature Address Date: Printed Name Signature Address - • • Date: Printed Name • Signature Address • Date: Printed Name Signature Address • • • Date: Printed.Name • Signature . Address • February 29, 2001 Petition to the Lily of•Petaluma Planning Commission - • Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number: CUP00014 The feelings of the residents, living in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. We, the residents of the neighborhood surrounding the McDowell site, wish to express our displeasure in accenting the or000sed aroiect, We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood, fora variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection.,or interest, in.a:sense of community: 2. We do•not want the additional traffic generated by this,expansion. _ 3, We do not want daily business-like operations from 6,a:m, until 10 p.m. 4 We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. We. the undersigned, D9 NOT approve of the or000sal by the Selvdjon Army to expand"and redesign the orooerty at 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma/CA 94954• • - . Printed NSm�„ ( �. Date: L — Address l' '>. > �.� b-cite VC( l 14 C ACr/L.) //2-4)A) `) Dater 3/f! Printed Name Address /3(2i Lo„ Emita' sits)/ „4-,a(.17E /i (/C/t / Date: C /-1 7 Printed Nai\ „� � Sicnature ',l C / •Address ( 3 / (p /��- • • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign,,721 So.,McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA,94955 I ^ L i tV�( l�\aV\U \e �i !` Date: J-4-() ` . Printed:Name 5idnature r I2 C' � . Address 1 21 '-OL`1 i 2-. ! tD.T., /✓I , V, 1_ gt/Ji Date: Printed Name Signatures s / , d.. ' �„ BJ Address ,S2A YjLL =ate X) e�� s A4SO -?'--)V--°/Dater Printed Name - / • / / Signature " if e gr Address /Yoe Re_y_i is / ' e_ i • ✓�� . � I i -0 Date 1 'L L Printed Name c' ian- r / t /7/ Si it Address /ED A) ?'Gl /'i it"( ?, . C TI Te1 Date 77/` 2°/I Printed Name// �� 5idnature I// K{' / / / Address 7 ..° 6 la'Ct M ,---^''L- iy ?Ie Lepag: j •• Dae; 31`tiot . Printed Name o SiQnaturp K./a/1-c- pl ,Lp Address / .o2-R 8 / Ce-L r c. am_ Pci:- crvhP-- .: February 24, 2001 Petition to the City'61 Petaluma Planning Commission Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number: CUP0001 r The feelings of the:residents, living in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma•Planning Commission. Tuesday;:February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. We,the residents of the:neighborhood surrounding the McDowell site, wish to express our displeaSUre•in accepting the proposed project. We do not want this facility inthe:_center of our neighborhood; for a variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not wish to bring in transient,visitors without a connection, or-interest, in a sense of community. 2. We do not vtant the additional traffic generated by this expansion. 3. We do not want,daily business-like operations from 6 am. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. We,the undersigned, DO.NOT'approve of the proposal by the Saivation.Armv to expand and redesian.the.propertv'at 721 So. McDoWell ElYd.-,,Petaluma, CA 94954 • I f I-) a I. •S N p IT7I Date: 'UV Printed Name Signature cJ2(P c._, Address,' L/ o cf .. .a R r_ S n At • cSGt -G�-TCirnQ2 7\'p. Date:, Printed Name 2--?7 ( 91/.0.2 4 j' ✓ Signature U CJ Address 1 o r ,n,s, > • j 11.--Vi`il e,CLS,41�'+ Date: 31 Printed Nate;. • Signature Address ('fog 3,4rc,kCc,' • , Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So.•McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954' �at✓AyrC ti:A Date:/o °2czd/ :P inted Name Signature . K g4. c ' w=: c Address /`/, 3 SQL,-f t.J) (-24 -_ 1/-27- (2 Vii'-w y t 0iC-1? Date: 2 i*fiY2 = 1 Printed Name �/ Signature J/ i2-..1 � fr'Q(r-Lti �_- _ Address /4 S I &i ./Rh./�, , J r 70A0 6474,07 Date: •yz/2..r..:7/ Printed Name //^j�I1,I,. p// • Signature (2t -1 ✓4,,rr Address ( 2 fariz: -4r' Of)y-e- • • l<1 (ein --/A l (1,,111 Date: "5/2,'/01 Printed Name q// Signature 677(.; 0 1i Address •16'70 5/ArL_A Ia-1„ f`yc, ' •BC-r-AJ VEI,Si:Apr Date: 3/410( Printed Name Signature 13,7".0 ,.::d.' Address \H'D S A:L 1LES1 q,,/ Pt • -J`L• eA/ \V Date: VC-I.:• Printed Name ( r Signature Q/,vL- ! I Address j q ro 7 m,(rc,7 (✓_,A, • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number:: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721,So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 DI- � Cpl L �� 6C6 Date3 -O Printed Name // )) /�/ Signature 9� 1 ✓"� �� `� Address L S 7—r-> -71-74e0 2G^ l,C-9-r . 1 (L.I I rn r c /1:74 Date: - Printed Name / Signature C� /✓L G4 c S f Address c:// Z c56.-L-4-K0i' %/-rT )17 �/ ' ./Pe/7i ,,(7C-' k)Ii;' <-1 e- Date: 37 G ,l//2( Printed Name Signature %:�' ) �<t Address / LI) ? .tt.r„ JJ, • / ,G7/ @4-2-0 NJ(/'S H 03 da Date: 7 /0 Ci/Z7 Printed Name /Y. A s Signature Address /� ! 2) 5 ffA•/. L 7/4 iv J A 1/214 /,,� Gil/17717/2C Date: 9/9/5/ Printed Name Signature 4 Address /52 o$i ' Date:“ \`\\.d Printed Name • Sicnatur • Address y, i. - Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign,721 So McDowell Blvd., Petaluma,. CA CA94954 w I: Ill- e r ' Date: 3 Ai ( /O l ( Printed Nam/ � Signature ( /' i / Address /t/y 2 r-...c2 . Jet — I S-- 2 V) IV ri CJ(k(r, Date: ilV. /6.1 Printed Nam) J C'�{ v.,---- / /JL� > � / E �oSFi �ar}� Date: , O Printed Nam / Signature i it{ yes 4 -Address / /' i- .4-/ r4:r .®,A,�-t „_c;'7 .-`79. C. - • c- , Date: // P i J)%fin- Address //S /3 � .c 0 �7t('5.SSn7 41.1 V Wi6..6)((1 Date: — y —a Ui Printed Name Sianature J' 1 i Address /67 Sa ' " 91: • e-7----4'ki. Co)14, LI Da e: q D'' Printed Name Signature,•. the A ^ 1_. LA, AC Address (.525- I r,jCeS lar• N rl✓e, • • • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City He Number: 0UE00014 Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 =V" 114l 1 ett bate: Printed Na e) i Signature Lk') - I " r Addre s - e � a , :p') uN�'� � Ll v. a1-lepte LtiFre 4Gh _l i Date: 2-4/-0 / Printed Name 7 LI/L4iL�[-4,L CV Signature � ce -i Address /6:9 3 4 : L Jl , W-t-eCy,iiE<e ) 94/:9,17 Side Lice r 12'� � h � Date: 2-411?) y Printed Name Signature4.,ar.t-.:_e !c? , � _, • Address 73 .5 :igt/ /y' ' 0.'cf•. -ti I'-'11 Celrl r LiE :7_6j Date: -3 - 11 -07 . Printed Name Signature 7 7 Address 1 82 S-R g_Ft6 e, i A ti. D 'A L v h Pc ci 4954 ' e2aJ J L, f - Date: 374(0 Printed Name ' Signature LA/U Address t5-3 5 (6-5(1V IR,$ ? 1,-1Jl-(F1- , (1419'5' 42E . 1-1 %441-Ce Date: /47 01 . Printed Name L / Signature /L //_ 4 • Address /"> e g,.. Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 • 5?ivation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowe_il Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954.. \ II 2 nL l ✓ l'\ , la,t&(j /v) Date: 3 /J (17 Print Sionature L1, . Address 15 1.1 '�I( i 't.11 In4 12`e''Atrr (�1A , '� vv , a- J � 1 � (. , ` ) (,< r 4q h �; Date: /7/0 Printed Name Signature -L %!.1L,,.. g//-� �i r Address /.ro cc v� k PL;-..74, 4t 0 71 G1 1 P l,/ Date: - /. rented Name I L /r Signature ,C '& Address Fe �(: \ 4 �/!'YpA/ , / pT/o tuv1io, 0.tt • C NO \ l� Yl i Lj Date: Printed Name `'� Signature ICLA 2Q'ov. Address - ® ` IJ c TC IU1n -0-X lit 7 n>2 el tO Date: 3- 3.-01 Printed Name me Signature 1 . q (�J () Address ILO_ 9 {�JJ� �" ,:,,M1-„, 1� Q • h / Date: - ' CO/ :::: : 2/ /// C Address //c-{.-7 �� - i-ICJ /),/?, . • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission' . • City File Number CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion and`Redesign, 721 So. McDowell;Blvd., Petaluma, CA,94954 P 1\/ � n0h�( Date: ,�-�/)i Printed Na e Signature f � 'i,91,. 6 I,I frti � Address (�Z `QIk �SiC in pp Pic 'icI7tilarpt r4 016l52-1 2a '('—c, . 7O\,.-3\6' 17)5 Date: rb — 0 \ P.i ted Name .n. Address \`t\ 0717 )N/ 91 CL-i\ :Q , 1L1-RU1Q1-1 (YOcE tNfU Date: J3 - 4/-0 % Printed Name ) Signature <. I ,,,, . ice, / • Address I SOS- _,Srr4./e.n.fr ,9.� ,29.9 . Al vr_EzL µam (',v 9-`/ciS 7 Mil / JG <c/l ,-1 Date`. -..' "75 v/ Printed Name �i Signature' 1 ✓ �`ii /'! --" Address /y/7 > / ;: -1;i. �f uai [ /,r�- /7/S,1 G-C l cry/ Bci do !1q Date: 3/ z--5/3 ( Printed Name // Signature - & , t Address . l Sar 4s 1 cm -7G:, ,,t c- U (U U, (A k�h�y �D\v,,,, \\na Date: `-)' 5 O` Printed Nam� J1 ` \ / Signature 1N.X `i°� Y\\A„ , 0 Address 1 L \ \ 90,l\(...G4\ gkAg5L Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion a nd Redesign,721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 44 954. n GZ -/�Hl ( /'-d) Date: ,3-n? 5 / Printed Na Signature 2.(.77. C Address '7 d 8 P&pk La /9( Rib..` l'. l k. . Non o/n ( l Date: 3 -c;5--6) PrintedName411-2---74=7. Signature u/7/ Address '7 Op p y' AC La"? E Printed Nane Date: Signature Address • Date: Printed Name Signature Address Date:- Printed Name Signature: Address • Date: Printed Name Signature Address 111 t. February 24, 2001 .• Petition to the OW of Petaluma Planning Commission • Subject: Salvation Army. Proposal, City File Number: CUP00014 - . The feelings of the residents,.living in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tue day, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed - project. On that date, a final decision,was put on hold. W- h- r.l. -n. •f h- n- '.h•s. •..• • •In• • '" P.A. -11 i • ' h • express our displeasure in accepting the or000sed'vroiect, We do not want this facilityin the center of our neighborhood, fora variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection, or interest; in a sense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic generated by this expansion. 3. We do not want dailybusiness-like operabons from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. ,I .4•• • t• • ..n. :rt. ,,. :.i•n h .r•...:- * . ,721 .... M P. -IrBIu•. •a,I m. • " • D :b� a , 4/11ovi /.<4444 e rl � , 1?1 q 7-7— Printed Name app rr � Address /.Z 7P /TV(-iyi: /41f-a' 10_e__ &Iv rna-- .)Hi'� �() c Date J II0 Printed Name a i n. .5.- .L4 Sa. Q Address �i I(ti c c 1 L -e__ P Ov" f '�. (GL GC,(M. D. -: Printed Name / . • ion.IL r- /f/ Address l ?,Z5 ?or r -tz , �- 1 • • • • • Petition, City of Petalurha Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma,.CA 99954 Abei,Fiz^(i, 5 / L' /NG2, Printed Name Date: � ��,'l Signature /�� i Address /2 9 ? e, - 4 1e 75,1m, , Cs. 9495y- L.. i Printed Name �s 111. °: 3 _ O O. ' l. . r"" q _ O Printed•Nay yr , ante + i A .ryc y r — J_ 3 I AA 9/- S � • Date: %?-- Yom/ Printed Name Signature —c—? Addresc /�� P r (1_,f//� PCB 6 . l `72 9J7 '� 11P c\>Sk(l Dateir)3 f ' Cif Printed Name Iona' r V�`: � ► �}(\_46>,•. .r-cc ' P \ . \ >,\ Date; 2,i7: � IDi Printed Name y Signature A. r-. c 1 / L.<.L 1-t • �/i lig al • • February 24; 2001 • Petition to;the'City"of Petaluma Planning Commission: Subject: Salvation Army Proposal; City File Number: CUP00014 The feelings of the residentylivin4 in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the:Cit' of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. We, the residents of the neighborhood surrounding the McDowell site, wish to express our displeasure in accepting the proposed oroiect, • We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood;-for a variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential,area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection,:or interest, in a sense of community. 2. We do'not want the additional traffic generated by this expansion. 3. We do not want daily business-like operations:from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want:the possible effect of reduced property value. We.fhe undersigned,=DO NOT approve of the prowl by°the`Salyation Arm./ to (cand and redesign=the°orpoerty at 721_2. McDowell Bivd:, Petaluma, CA 94954 •, hit . f174j/14ne4) Date: 3los/D/ Printed Nam // • Sionl' 1re,!s5' `/ i/ y'_L2/41/' `n . Aura _ if o tf:3/os-A / Pnnted Nam '�L�'; .a : i.n• . �� aria" .S /, A. � . .r� �. = !e .ai • /ttL( QIt 1--- OG^ce Date: 3 Sc Printed Name Signature Address ,S/ ),S v� `"C --->L-0 C,v _ Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission • City file Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign,.721 So, McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CAS-4954. 14 • < , .cl Ia I L. ir= I i D: e: Printed Name Signature LgraA-0-04 C Address .7 06 SO AA ,• . ID 0 _..�. • Date: Printed Name • ian ' r - Address Date: • Printed Name Sienature Address • .– • P . ': Printed Name • - ion *ir Address Date: Pn nted Name Signature Addre45 Date; Printed Name Sienature AddteR5 • 1 • February 24, 2001 Petition to the City of Petaluma Plahning Commission Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number: CUP00014 The feelings of the residents;,living in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. We the residentsofthe neighborhood surrounding the McDowell site, wish to express our displeasure in accepting the proposed project. We do not want this facility in center of our neighborhood, for a variety of reasons. 1. This is a.residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection, or interest, in sense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic generated by this expansion. 3. We do not want:daily business-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. We,the undersigned, DD NOT approve of the proposal by the Salvation Army to expand and redesign the property at 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Peialunla, CA 94954 • (Y LCwC1, / 55 Date: -Irk IOI . Printed Name Sianature )1c9,?ti<-4(,2 1,1 ;c,--)1 • Address '6' ), � 7 I i1 �_2 C\-j( I( , li VC- "Cll. (, :j<i 16' () \--C c 3 (1.t P(",\OA" Date:: 3 J5)o Printed Name J I/ Signature, 2 �),� I`t �. /Address iI -J ■ of a '` / A 1 �Ob 4 fisicir E) Q�)TP. Date: 31 5 I'(71 Printed Na . . Sianaturee� IL—, 1.„-, Address I2 1.-N • Petition, City of Petaluma.Planning Commission •File Number: CUF014 Salvation Army Expans onOand Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 CO/UA 2. p I. lIU /Y1✓ Date: 5 —Li---0/ . Printed Name re A /7 a SignatiT Y/a' If r I ..'G. 4.-7(.2 Address/ Q' /.>rf7/�'o xi i/1 . //-:- 7--2-74. U iZ/ `� , �// , �, 0c//7 C i /! /4-Mc Date: ._3- 5--4 Printed Name Signature-. nO-• /Z Addre /,-�;- ` /4'2-/;'2/)/7 1- L57, i-976-4 A 7 i{) C JrCC iJ Date / od) Printed Name/ Sianatur° CCC ., '7v -/=fi/r�� Address air '+_5-421 Cie es I-e NL)11,) fl \(MA Date: -3/.*/X'%O J Printed.Name , 1, / I,I/ 4 r tV Signature `\ l.v.L., RI:^•1 //I'' / Address _-7C C�V/-0 S O l 1 '�-e (! 0 ili c___ / 5 V Printed Name ,q�/')I1 /7 Signature /✓` ∎.e'yt cif Cr - AddreSs l-V` v44iC 74'id /n'. !f' L,e i r)l ; C- I l i 7`'C n l Date:_2-5 N, Printed Name' Signature UrAA,L / 1);0 (71-ea / Address - f,3c6' inifl ' t.V I' �-M 'p_ _y •, J • 4 • February 24, 2001 Petition to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number: CUP00014 The feelings of the residents, living inthe area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held,to approve, conditionally,approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. ' We, the residents of the neidhbbrhood surrounding the McDowell site, wish•to express our displeasure in°accepiing the proposed project. We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood, for a variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection, or interest, in a sense of community. 2. We do not want'the additional traffic generated by this expansion. 3. We do not wantdaily businPcs-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. We, the undersigned,.00 NOT approve of the proposal bv•theSaivation Army to expand and redesign the property at 721 So. McDowell Blti;ri.,.Petaluma, CA 94954• • 5/f'/2/x//'7/ ( A6 /7/27 ? Date: 3.- 3-0/ Printed Name Signature ' C /74 .1-(-c-e-c l .!-r X 1.7/%Gam a Address r 6 Q /21E / f)/. 111'1/�� Date: _2. 3 c,( Printed Name J 1 f / Signature Address c-K,\ JC I 1)2 —D D Ft )9'CGt hl 1 O (.c S� Date: 3 3 —0/ Printed Name • . Signature Address g0 i]cr e / o4-• 027470 g • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City rile Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign,721 So, McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 e/2'% /3 S Date: ,3/.3 82: -• Printed Narie/�/�j)7 i/�, •J Sianature CiLv Address 7 !�/V/L)/Gz /2r } YCGQ 4L \ (-c) Date: 3" c'' —C Printed Name -- Signatuce--)c(. ---Q- Address -7 v ti 6'A a) �- / I; b l 4) Date: D 3 - C Gl Printed Nam • Signature i/ 01/' li /,� Address / 112:--74/./y/./2 • C !' p ( ,) ,1 L . 111;(( Date: U `J/0`� I Printed Nate ' VJ , Signature ,-62)(2,12,1.4./ _ Address /L/3.5: 1„ 3 - 3 /f1AG�--- Date:. Printed Name • Sianature �i�"�'i Address // 33 U^ cr ,J 0 "G- h e`e_.• Date: 3 3',O Printed Name Signature , i , > 1 // G 'i • Address � � /Y • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA94954 s << `� c ti Date: 3 3 o I Printed Name r. Signature ( Address 'JO I \ u'n c /47;4// //A ybc a4-/) Date: yZni, Printed Name �� Yy/1 / Signature � Address / S / )A G.t,2 / T-5(.,r; chi 114 (.., Lk)<� Date: Printed Name - • Sionature ," / —T !] Address %� >'/ �lc !3 li Ci4i 44„11T': /i� % 1\ 'I) y �_ D A, Date: a Printed Name / Signature • 11A- (t `� Address I S D U 7m/4 4 e L IW . I) /7, I. T .? -o a (L«a& ?T Date: Printed Name Signature 1 —/'/L ,-1 • Address /14 6 'f.°"`"u°"• G . 00R' 013 • Date: 3 _ g G / Printed N ,e . , e Signature ) _ // • Address � / 7 6 I I+r0 1 G— it I_.,/ Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUFu0014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 j-) ; C (EN! DCreniGlleI ( Date: 3 ,3 (#) Printed Name ( /� Signature / AJ�,rge/f-r-D :1/2!" a �� Address /LI ✓' 1 C} t ci fr'l e CI4 941L-t>S L7— 44.56 g f'(o i_h F 9 11,i d l LE.�1 Date: 3 -5 0 Printed Name I / Signature 174,. Address 13 36 NI rigrAN ��`f P tqLun, a . CA. cc ' - !� 0 C E L! Y7 G Gv Date: J -4 Printed Name Signature /,7 e- L-'772 • ��.LitiC u� /� • Address 7. ! `�7"Ica v C/✓ �a 4:• C/, 42; • ( l1 Iv 1 1 ) s Date ' / Printed Name /�� / Signature G diAA. t,� 7(YL.'2i/,;) Address 1 27-( /V ) A l H /LJ (N -y' '�;1 I{� LI�� l � l D ./ A.y ,7 /� Date: Printed Name� '/ /J 1;t Signature /` r `/ Address /‘ (9 9 �!/i7/a 4') U)/9 ✓ //l • i 7/ A9 , 7///q, Date: PrintENaire / ' Signature /4 1 // C J'j�,f/2'.).. Address /13; , /P �/ '� / /(1-/ S • • Petition, City of Petaluma`,Planning Commission . City File Number: CUP000T4 Salvation Army expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 44454 RIv - -«-; p (6 7 Date: 3 - Printed Name - ■Signature L%7 [_ -K'� /}' .'L t �' Address / 6, /l`ICC.!c,{t(_to &<) z-L--L-7 / • - G( r /� I am ) G__ l• L+ , 1 Date: 3-5 " L l Printed Name Signatu4---a_Cc1LIJC).AA/lc.<4 , , • Address 1 3 3-7 ,1 � { cc n LC':_a_i, L A// P, J\) 6/0 74/ / .. • ;.• Date: Printed Name , �� 17 • Signature , N 0'4 �� .. . • Address /J`7'o 74? G veoH, r-✓/>V . -1- - -03.4" (/ ) C-E Date: -J (4° Printed Name /7 nD/ signature —\\ IYj -7)-el ® J 6U=c,, 1�1 �� , Address l �" v . (.� W Oil �(�� rt �) I k / /L2/4-/ (1/1?S7/ Date: 3/02/ Printed Name . Signature/ l4 G{J/ 'x Address /3.3:7 /17/77r/i9.C> A).� \/. / l . <23,-e- 'i 6,77-rc / Date: 0,5/0R/45 / Printed Name Signature • Address /54-1 NJA2/A ) lei/ y Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUPOQ014 • Saivatio Army Expansion and Redesign,.721 So. McDowell Blvd.,.Petaluma, CA.94954 /izi-t,-��nnn — /(/'7274 /L- Date: ��3 �7 Printed Name Signature/ --LL.Ll f-,, 71 Address 957 3A/c/IE:& - `r i=ci7)(,:c A. ,P 2NEy Date: 3/3//-' Printed Name Sionature; y,2 Address (:)0 � i ii vl C L_ RYE • (fir l , 7 Y (15-21 • / • ,//4-0,,l c i= r, 7706=/)2!E/ Date: 3/_3/0 / Printed Na Signature .i1,!,t,/_-cJ I)c&--14.4-4 1 . Address fn �J �i t /� i/r ( /+-i,U.a1�4-- .)9 . P/f/%'k? a '" (i,r1 r_ R' f(ML€/_c_i Date:. C:3%/4/ Printed Name ZSignature —2- ✓s � Address •'I . a,• a" I t=`74-6 O a a S. /-■ V C,(mot- A7—ce-f3,4, 64 -J,,E /„.-Z_-s n .0 Date: 153/ 0 (O I: Printed Name Signature • i Address`' ( t 4g (---/- _ 24kl -e-. -Re-AL,-) nn-A- l:4-i-- ryf S 7 • Al I'�/G fA m,I(,i, 5" Oti Date: ��4�� /. Printed Name . Si.nature .� L)4 JZ ') 1 ' . .: .'tASa /, / (J Address e9C/ /V /P'L r- / — P714! U/`//p / 4/95 • „._. . ,.. • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission _ City File Number: CUP00014, Salvation Army Expansion and'Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 D I / o R V I1 Al Date: 7 7 5 /2 Printed Name - Signature 1 -X'/ � '~'l - i`-�/ Address 1 3 )J L (14 LL/12Y `�/ _CA- � Ok1N E- L;C'werd Date: 3-O6- 0 1 Printed Name Signature 4 LI ti. - Address ( / tiL :Fl ,�/ c%7,'tG ' ;4 e 9// Y C,io,L`A. Lou ) E_ry Date: ” O " 0 / Printed Name • Signature t2�c:--- c 0. "-'�.i'2-u�,j` . Address �� i n. n,c-\ , (11 !'c LIP v r gL L (f.4- Date: 3 -/-6.7 -17( Printed Name Signature g' API i _ - � Address 7( ' `6v�t "� r Lk/ tv Date: Printed Name • Signature Address Date: Printed Name Signature • Address Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 9495' Printed Name Date: a2/ au/ Signature Mty-/ Address g2(-h �� IFNb l3&7D hits Date: 3 /f/duo / Printed Name • = i Sionature Address 3_57:.; '7—TAi T — (/2C7A (2c,//=e/) ; jQ 07; Date: 70/ Printed Name 2�� SiGnatur° Address F--5- Co i7,7 9e C7C , Gr N • • /-, /A / � /m/DsoA./ Date: V//0/ Printed Name Sionature i Address P/O C), ,7/e( f , 8,S? 9'9/9:5-" / Printed Name Date: Signature Address • • Printed Name Date: Signature Address • ; February 24; 2001 • Petition to the City'of Petaluma:Plarining Commission f Subject: Salvation Army Proposal,•Citi File Number CUP00014i., 4• •.1.r The fitelialgegelaresideits, living:in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma Planning Canmission.,TueSday, February, 13, 2001, a • Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date,a final;decison'was put on hold. . Irn *++a idea of tit-- k hti ti 1 I site.wish to exam our disirleasire in .. the proposed project. : • We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood,fora Variety Of reasons. 1. T11is is a residential area:that does not wish to bringin,transientvisitors without a connection,,or.interest, In asense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic generated by this expansion. 3. We do not want daily!busine5s-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want bepossable effc..1 of reduced propeity'value. 4. ,.. •t. .:•s t..: s.'a' lag . Y j rip real .: ..s ' +:a! _ 1 `•g ; ..... ...•1 :.sua ... x. +:... .1ti' t.�.,_5.`_it 0.1; r if]!_tt L. 0 iT .111-• •• ;AP at.ir. .:11 • „ :G _,r Mr. Luck Ciravett „ 1568 Trrellis.Ln. r Petaluma,CA 94954-5444 Date: '6� M� 6 f1 2 00 Pnn (� • s ue . ✓%Xl' ' ; . . . - .•i "' Dis�IIar6ara Grant.. _ - Ir .RdahLma CA 954'4411 _ • P ', r!fy otfYP s :? . = k € Dab. "3 - is . .)_oc,1 anature ES Y1 ♦ C, CS - •2: 2\1C9 s _2 1 r s J JC e,P. L. A;/J ;/J Date: . -.2,s- 01 Print' • lice , / Pi i .Add nxs " J./9 ti,I-i l) C- 1 I R DI , . ? • • r Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion/and RRedeAn,721 So. P1cDowel{Blvd., Petaluma, CA 9-4054 • L " ' <a✓ . Date: c S Printed.Name / Signature pAdren S'- C„ LpIC� ��a 4.-e 44 i _ GYhA1-`. Pate: /2r/.. Printed Name 5lanature _t7 Address S S C/ (93 c, G Printed Name Signature �4” �i ` :;- <._ Address S 7 1 "ye..F L/a /:77\o ' ( ' r- `; /? 1\1i f1C3 'ire; ,3 /Z5/1(21. • Printed Name. Address 5 l R- trni. 7G(UCi _ Or. re-' 4t< c/r is[a ra:• /z� 6/ Printed Name Signature 0—� /26A-9.—>,— / Address } l J22iC/ c /iC (97: 7571-,t-Ayr? 5,� Date: �� -d /4/ Printed Name • 5lonature C-21-74":", ,. • Address NC: /0 ( / 4J ae71w • C. Petition, City.of Petaluma Planntng Cornmisson .City File Number CUP60014 Sa iva tio n Army Expansion and3Redesigni721 So. McDoweli Blvd.,,Petaluma, CA 94954 411W8 Y Date: f-)12Da Printed Name SiOnature A AJC--i • Adctc'ss An i -3F c)C--(jcr DtAue..- -3 /2 "5//0 I Printed Name sgnjrT — Address / 3 3 Cr pLu.-a) to iz H-r—, ?V557 4 Pcil:-f Dte: 2 - 1? ,,r) ) a c7\7 I Printed Name (Y JONI' -4- AddreSS 4 1A- 1/7 I) • • Printed Na - r, 5snaturec —FC\ c.\\ • • N )A? Printed Name • ,Sianature Adst. 0 4 . cer7-79- vr I -z • -Ts! sas--,Dcej Printed Name Slanature Address /(/)--4/ tlichz -91>nit-01(2,--- 9 %.-.71 • r Petition, City of Petaluma Manning Commission City File Number: CLIP00014 _ Salvation Army Expansioniand Red Sign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 Z./..,) 0 ki 6,) 4 "/-1 Printed Name Sionature • Pctians / /7 Co /co 0 o • (2-_7_ 0 //*S Date: Adi( Printed Name X,.• z r /z/ /'r/C7 Address / /7 ( LD 4ejo Cc,/ la-, -F-(= \/Ncl ci :31 2 (Ad Printed- Namen( Skmathre Additss 'IL/S L'Jc . r, e uti Z) r . ". c;.• (Ai ( LItelL (2 c,\-(31 Qate; R D ' • Printed Name "-7 Signature /,± 27/1,6:1 Add= / Li- / • k") o h( Pn. crat ; Yc91)10 Printed Name Sienature_V UV_Sii 2 thLig:nt-i,,__Ty Address /11`71-/ L-911,0 er) Dim ;-, ;) +el kyia 2Y7. 7 SY ---?(V ( ON/ Date: • :ilyc-J.0 Printed Na • • A - /. • ALldrS 0 (Lc ( • • - •bfuaiy 24, 2001 Petition to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission Subject: Salvation Army Proposal,,CityFile Number: CUP00014 The feelings of the residents, living in the area of Me above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. We, the residents of the neighborhoodsurroundinq the McDowell site, wish to express our displeasure in`ac`cegtinq"the'proposed project. We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood, for a variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection, or interest, in arsense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic generated by-this expansion. 3. We do not want daily businPcc-like operations from 6 a.m. until.10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property.value. We,the undersigned, DO NOT'approve:of the proposal by the Salvation Army to expand and redesian the jiropertv'at 721 So: McDowell S{vd., Petaluma,CA 94954 /v4/0y Date: c? — 8 - 0/ Printed Na - Signature - "� / Address / V3/ I )1t _ c/cz r Qom • 7 (A/63R IP C. )--/ cR,O Z-A Date: 3 - 8- o Printed Name Signature • Address f J G D I e d CO' W el" r C cq e r4440 �i iG12 AZY G;l ZCL Date: 3-2 70/ Printed Name • Signature 1 n„ell \/ ? tea _ dress / U d') IV/Q/ C �7 j / pe2ta /G,'rna • R Petition, City of Petaluma-Planning Commission • City File Number: CUP00014 . Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign,:721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA,94954 @-o\ \een I -aneI Date: 3 ,aD. ow° f . • Printed Name ��oo nnnn . 1,I- Sionature (la"i-CK/il I :ORA&� Address i1-1tq RenAt J Ii (L 1.(J Iry ZI e-- r\ �0.,,, )cc_ Date: 3A )I °- Printed"Name D — • signature€/ QI, / CJlf� C / _ Address /`1 �5— MecT6 c .? (cif (� 'i--✓I,., 1l Date: 3 7,246'2124 Printed Name 111 • Sig naure _ •Address i 'kI, r• 1-e _ ; iS Dater/O/9.1 Printed Name t , Si.nature \/ A!1I i. &Lai Address '1)-- �' , Q.�. LAk 1 CLcti' Q. LQ1 aAjF,r�N Date: Q1/ • Printed i -ne di aS'Sit na t��! _ iir ® Address �7a?O ;i,4 ` rL . Gt ii -liti AAk./14 Date: 3b04/ • Printed Nam- . i Signature Si • Address /Y'7 f1:149/cuov k • • • _ Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 CA f\ 1 Date:\°) J( O I Print Name • Si.nat: . (ea • Address b13 r! ' )'4 N LUA ,. PIT . ` `'1959 Date: Printed Name Signature Address Date: Printed Name • Signature Address Date: Printed Name Signature Address Date: Printed Name Signature Address • Date: Printed Name • Signature Address • • February 29, 2001 Petition to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission • • Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number: CUP00014 The'f3&li.ig 'of'tho resident, living in the area of the,above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be?known to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting'was`held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. We the'resIdents o€<the neiahborfiood surrounding theMcpowell site wish to express our displeasure in accevtin5 the oFoiac ed vroiect, We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood, for a vanety'of.reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not'wish to bring in transient visitors without a .connection,or interest, in a sense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic generated by this expansion. 3. We'do not want daily business-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect,of reduced property value. We,the undersign .,_pO:NOT'a°Drove of the proposal try the Salvation Arrnvto expand andredesidn the property at 721So. McDowell Blvd..-Petaluma, CA 94954 Date 7 - 1 -� I S Printed Name. Sionature,'?.2/2q /4.} 40 1 J Address' /9-E6_M01/70/7 If / fiP`-7‘G/lJ090-- • A /rf( A t .- r _ Date: 3/2-G/n/ Printed Name • i.n. .r i = a-J -G-c=-�-x--� It(Address / � ti1�/ f/rJ ( U`% / U n I t < • Date: /J zC/06' Printed Name . Sionature 072•'7 1-7 Address 7 C Ct �� —�/ C De r . • • Petition, City bf,P.etalUrna.Planning"Commission City File Number. CUP00014 Salvation Army Expan jsidn and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell acid., Petaluma, CA 99954 10W4 S/te' L Date: 3 46/0i Printed Name./e. 1i0 (/ &(44 j Address /.UVi /, •g70/2/,. (J-\ ft (7 G(/ %S..._- P ✓r,•L Date: 3 9/ Phn !7 c ed Name Signature //� ,y° 1�//, / - All an_ 7/x24./r 2 r,,< / / .l' Y4;ir :27// Printed Nam,p • Signature(. v '� c %�/ . .✓�:, �� /S /> f n ( rt� Address ;.1/-'-�- 12f 4-P.,i g., 17. Il ell,' AjyrvLCi . Chi q6"1" L . Ci " 1 . Printed Name/ /1J j Signature /�- - ? '// �— Address (-1 G l'? 7-)_0.,w,r) ✓�.ca (.`\ 1 `t J`,G�1 1 vu'sl Q y �6f i /f EK / Avos Date: -S • <e> -o/ Printed Na Signature / //! Address / a'd` f/4t`>a JA- 7)v, f Z nc ,4 X71., q9?-`--c-1 Date: Printed Name Signature . • Address February 24, 2001 • Petition to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission • Subject Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number:. CUP00014 The feoling�-of the residents, living in the area'of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma -Planning Commission. Tuesday,'February 13,2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve conditionally approve, or deny the,proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hoid. We the residents of the neialiborhoodsurroundina the McDowell site: wish to express ourdlsoleasiire•inaccepting the'pr000sed Droiect, - We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood, for a variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential=area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a —connection, or interest, in;a sense of community. 2. We do.not want the additional"traffic,generated by this.expansion 3. We do not want daily business-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. We,the undersigned, DO NOT approve of the proposal by the Salvation Army to expand and redesign theprooerty at 72150. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 194954 • A a� !.7CAt, D. •. ,� • Printed Name , ionature A dress �SoS S/prr n, Pef�l�M , (G 4y9�,y %4/ sN .) Date: 3/2-C/o r Printed Name algat ure vA Address 1505 5i' rr-q DIt • yvvirn • Vie: - 26 - Di Printed Narh 5icni ture Address 1/0' s a e- emu_ • tY - E February 24, 2001 • Petition to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number: CUP00014 • The feed residents, living in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission meeting was held to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project: On that date, a final decision was put on hold. We, the residents of the neighborhood surrounding the McDowell site, wish to express our displeasure in accepting the proposed Protect, We do not want this facilityin the center of our neighborhood, for a variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection, or interest, in a sense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic.generated by this,expansion. 3. We do not want daily busins-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4, We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. We. the undersigned, DO NQT approve of the Proposal by the Salvation Army to expand and redesign theoropertv at 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 / • / iLS Date: Printed Name 5ianature--)7`i°vP 7/1- Address /lO 2 iJ r 51/44. ScoA Z.Un ,+ +, Date: 3 L/— o / Printed Name • Sionature , 51ti5C. ?ems 1 Vti • Address 1 Li J O SCt f kz S c-NA t74. • Sc of St-e e e Dte: `l/o / Printed Name (n • Sionature Address 1112-0 S4/Kc /tik) D� • Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 - • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 Date: Printed Name - c---- / < Sianatiire Address /. c-6 s- n Date! Printed Name Address / So r vAN Date: 3- Printed Name Signature Address I ); / ))"-- • Lcuinc \ 10,00.9 ( Lf2_, Date: Printed Name ,- Address. (4 S RcKcii4± . A-ZZAr,& KLP5C: Date: ?\ L Printed Name 5linature GrNc\__Q \AR se—j— (111 • - XI/cc-Li 5 • Date; Printed Name Signature A. - /Y1_3 tHe71.5 \,\ 1 3 - c/ February 24, 2001 • Petition to the City of/Petaluma Planning Commission: Subject: Salvation Army Proposal, City File Number: CUP00014 The fcdtiiies ,f 11 residents, living in the area of the above-referenced facility, need to let their opinions be known to the City of Petaluma Planning Commission. Tuesday, February 13, 2001, a Planning Commission.meeting was held to approve; conditionally approve, or deny the proposed project. On that date, a final decision was put on hold. We, the residents of the nelghborhQod surrounding the McDowell site, wish to express our disoleasurein acceotioa the proposed project, We do not want this facility in the center of our neighborhood, for a variety of reasons. 1. This is a residential area that does not wish to bring in transient visitors without a connection, or interest, in a sense of community. 2. We do not want the additional traffic generated by this.ezpansion. 3. We do not want daily business-like operations from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m. 4. We do not want the possible effect of reduced property value. We. the undersigned, DO NOTApprove of the proposal by the Salvation Army to expand and redesign the property at 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 zc 'II • /'� - /° L� r Date: 4/Man C� Printed Name � • • Address tit 17r /1-E 7". M Yuri 0 f' c IL-' Date: 3/'-�/d Printed Nam Aft . -2 770/ °±)/'1. DatP: 34//C Printed Name(? 7) Sinnature P. (/ o A.. / Z ' A PQ 7,7' r l' t' !'-Ie.--, • • • • C,. Petition, City of Petaluma Planning Commission City File Number: CUP00014 • Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA.94954 Printed ame\\( . Date: V Signature J C ,vn/y/'v \( ,1 C� �l Address \1--F4 l °� �C � z \cr-e s Printed Name • Signature /�J ,cio • Address /Y`2 P/ -12_cz tc' Pn r 5W ! cs/ Date: Printed Name Signature 7214 L,.ti ;/(0 yJ04--- Addresss //757 /5A o, Fs,.,,/ 2)5 C_ • 7Zei 4r-1 -Dare; 2— Z V—C7 Printed Name Address /4"Z9' •Czr :t e7 4 • Printed Name Date: • Signature Address • Printed Name • Data; Signature • Address Ms Petition, City of Retaluma„P.Iarining,Commission City File Number: CUP00014 Salvation Army Expansion and Redesign, 721 So. McDowell:Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954 d sid � OA NYE— •. e: Printed Name . it . r- Address /V7---3 C> r>,0- JL .nom 7 / y).57 Date: Printed Name n r Address r. -: Printed Name Sionatu e Address Date: Printed Name Signature Address Date; Printed Name - Signature Address • Date; Printed Name Signature • Address ► . 9 C c 1.,i . CC E o v ao °o T ICI TQ Lu o,g '� E a„ AOi gg Y 0. - O O TE t E 56 4 a o r v CU O T 2 Q -T Q U N u Q vl �' a c a a '� m' E o, a v m U C7 C4 E'a x d m E C E E ca ° m m ` o O w w .o E , T ° T7, > .k. E. T v'm > R v c cc Z 'o a.. a p e 5 ,. o o c_ 42 -6- o -o � � N N � n � mv2 O dG ca- n. ' 4 _ . O y V] •- Q. 0. 0 w M O Fj GC L 12 p O N - an . O 'S > T O O O D U _ P. 4 O 0 ?'O -0 E m U U 4 Q• -a 0 'O U O o II > rn U Cn • ? a a ` aa a' a v , n a n ? .-° O o 0O. 0n 0 ' .0 0 OO oo o o o oo 'o. 0 , , •O p i o 2 ° 0E 32 5 0 0o02 ra v o H 2 4 c- 1 E E 0 M 0 4 i,o. m 0 m'a o E o co n a n 0. o'., 0 �.0 00 0.0 O o 00'0.0 0 o 0 0 y O1 Ol 0" o 0 o m 0 o 0 0., .d 0 Oi CO ... t'n ,o. 0 CO nN Ln a. 0 U II cn 0 v co co E . En OD E V a E °0 6 0 d U 0 U U° m v Z 0 U N q U F a. Nc a Z y v y Z. .° s..a.: a 4. 9 ° U a d .. Q o m 2 E a .w E' F.c o az O 0 0 ti � ^ o � U V D w _°CD °5 D•0 o W °1 w 4'to on rn Cl_ 0 ' .n L 0 0 8 �.,o P' '' :c "° !Y CO' E3 ..a III .. T . ° i n >, U.V � m ?%C.)U 2 m 0. Q I U m 0. U U U U m d U U U NI. • a.A Cl-, 2 F -c • L v. K _ a U g o A n y o o e'o N er ao o o•.m o I2E QiU „ o N q N Ory d 1 ,� .4 • T m • O - >. c • d 0 n T , O T C J a = G 5.a G ° E E E E 'o a v 'oc= v a' a 0 07� 0 o 7.. p Q T o Q. T N rO T co Q T O N ^ O N J9 -c C V y - W .0 0 CO W . v m° ° ¢ E<' <U E E E. . E E , E. E � m .5..'g E �E0 Em c v d E N E t E o ' E E 5 E 0 i. ' a v Q. ;a e 6 ' '° -= V. 0 82-2, a 2.-='00,7- 7„ , G• 6. N 'O t Q=— p a .N-. L. N O O 6 n y. 0.0 a.- E,, O O. 'r. . p. TON UU oN > OUCS 0.. ^ '?N VU' o 0. 0i aR UU a. ^O,o of o o O v] _m O 0 o O v]O O O: O N 0' O;O: 01 • • g •0 0 a'o a s . o,a`o a 'a a a'a'0 a. E :0 °°- a'.o o . O O •'O 0..0 o N o.0 0 O o o O..o O.- O o o O O r'] CO.', V ry• E. a 2 � e ' 2'2'E` e E o a m a m r :a m a a'a.°: E E m a o : c O o 0 0 O 'O O 0 0 0 0;0',0 O " O 0 0.0 p c N;O 0 O.O O 0 O O O 0 Oo o o O N [n O O O re-Cr; Tim O ^'N CO Q °\ K v11- vl o -, CO C • l� Vi • c V C N E . 'V ge Q. Q < 0 0 U U T E a m E 0 U 'V ;o En co 0 co t en en IS 0 o u °' U n 0. U ;9; V U 'm mV U m 0) J] u vU 2 d V U > c „8 o'U U -_ '°� c.U`0 .; ': c c 0 U .; Q ° _ 0 4 '•v 0 v c 6 v: a E ' .o Z: t= E a ° I0 U■ E, : m _ E :c E 7 o ..c tee m nm `u ° U 'E . , IL• ' ' . rc mm _ . v� ° E m e ca, U ' . ea V E v 4 v U U E °' a U U on,r E n U c - • . E 0 0 0 0 Q C7 Q 3 V V 0 0 40, 00 0 z m 0 0 0 0 0 U • 3 ri m'� vico .�' U z O 0 • C- o O.�ry h moa .e0 vl ° NO:OO 44 o = N OO .=0 e O • 0 • 0 . ' ■:', . 44 • SOUTH McDOWELL BOULEVARD • m m H 9431 30 W ICC HO 52 40 __L 24 0 t97 2 047 0095971 \ I H 13t 70 17 0 I •17-t 1 I I 7 P0_112 `-'7 I r ' 1 I? [I (■(04 ' rol , ,1 1 , >, ' r 4 4 CD E cc ,a1 A0,1 Lc t.ciacaa K m ) R] a ° ..,7 , I ' ',4F:. 9' \ 1 1 ; ' - ---I 4 4 § ' \ k..1 ,/ M ils\\,, z „ 0 r -`--71--:"---,. - \-L)-4Th L ,,A *if... IELL.r.r Lu _ _ t.<1 73 r,r 1 6 SP CE5 .7 ,1 14,4, ' 1-- k 1 11 > . i „. 1 1 - Z - ts ....,, Ili - , 7 at [ 7.--'---- 1 3, 1 i. •H -, 6 sr• 55 V .5 5 .7 li i 1 1 i: 4 4, i - n . 0, \\,, , \ , =1 ,,J i , , , . , ,, • , 1 11 I >11, (r•K, * .2, ,, II i 1 0, ,,,,.. , , , ,, 7 9 E5 It7 \ :Fri • ., 44 5005E5 -. \ 57\ -41 • ) IL/L7 / ' . ,r .. P, ° .c, --- I, a 4, - , - -IR 1 \ A A . / --( . ■n 0 Tii k 4 • H r 1; i ) H 1 • i' i )4 ,i ,• ...,___ s .•11 ji /11 , ! \ ‘ , , , re 5 9 Aar J -'-- II \ • '‘ El ' • 1 • • -- n • 'a 1 I I , 16. { - - 1 ' ' Y 41 4_,-4- , 1- ‹.4 - ....,,- L- \ „ / 0. .„ , `? , t'.<1 ' tiliWrOnes __ _-_•'.—-- '• I • ; '9( ,-----... -cse-v--, ciaccE—rw-:.., --,---.72 .N -`1 0 ke,i7 <,--___---- „, , . , . ,„ x ' .: 0,:,- , ,,), ..,) ?/ i — 4d — — 1 K . o - /- -J / " S'• \ • I 0 (0.4010 w / ,,.0 > w - / \ 0; , . ic 1 wv, iq t A 40 [1 I K .-9 -I R -l•a ik-I--W,-- :1 .k,m - )• ' ?.. 1 PROPOSED MASTER PLAN FOR 1 t g a g m If ./.6 a°44 irtak' :--9?,- Ic'tt--i ir > 5,55—> >> -o ? t 7 W:5.5 9,J5 E0 07 °.5557 `CHI 7 5 E id,57:0 a Z4 rs,`?;,11. risC,ri I ; rz> SALVATION ARMY PETALUMA CENTER till,- a ._." -I a S 05 70 71 5 2 ^ g 721 So. McDOWELL BLVD PETALUMA, CA q*, li a, vi) T • —Air pill tai € VO 'VW(1-IVLmd 'CIA-18 -11BMOa°W U '09 LZL g -a°2s ea as:� ;;, RLN dWflidl d IUN8V IVCOI1dA�VS a �Z I . iY 98v ; a 0 1 1 11• I All Ai k 4dOJ NV1d,H81SVW GBSOdOdd x 5 .6 g Q — vm . a ig 1 a • • z EL Q \ g = p p ql?tiir# LI J 'I \ !1 11�i 1' 11 I , G.R. / 1 L (li .i,, 000 '� \\„,,:, i 111 �l it �— fi d �l 1� £y g 2 r; 0 ¢ T El 1/(� BC' rj _ i� _ e_ EA. � ` ii a 6o W ,1 iti 11 F ag . �— e 0 AilraiT r-7- r 1110 1 °" \Y/ # _ z Ell { ..}} qaqa SSE��.. C AON 0 �f�1._.. :o it ! R816� f C 86 a CAA i '� I 1 i =maw 0 Al 94 '.p \ \ '[I1r1l1 f ate. too I $ .:§YaI @�jE,7 el o it F1 \ 4 . �t�r�r 9 + �}} 1 if I I f i t z �1; ; 14 ■�A■-I 11114111 MIMI — W 1vfliii ! Ili ( l_ . 1 1 k 1} i eta, { '� D fa `` r(� J1tp1' �2 ' we[ i..n� l \ / anv ea i.[m .0 4 E vJ 0 J til � .:. H I s I i i ip Iff # • z - 11-�4}I I I f fil l Sd 2141 Q -.) 0 • • • _. .. • • • 0 al • 19-0" ./- ilifili i 0 , I'`1,' o all.} --I . ' I4�I' . i in ' r �1�il ill . CD ii�._i Rol I = 1 � iJ dl�� i � � < a cn „ ,�',,, � n 4 �IIII�IIIl. :litleidIL ;rIillll, m A- 2/". I di'\Z C f ® �I{I�4t D ; Ili r -. D iil I r I 1 v Li I n .y prig{ flit t1 8 _ 11SiPS11Cti( I C� ■� Kt} {I' � ; n I gam .1 . •n sR Li 8 f td1 lE it a i F .11/ I PM I o -� t 7111 iiiiiiiighill Z bine / II ,, e C)' Ill, . ..ksa ii, ,, ,,, 4 wit I 1� . , _ _ u------ a (!7 H . i i rr.;€. . rn m rn m m�� 1{+ ' a o �� ai, I Z ion 1 .1 i I 11 4 Ill 111111 i Ll l, i 11111111 I �'ii _, i ' ea L91.I I I 1 ri• 1)1 11111,411 i ivy3�7 it pi .r. . dd o V VA rill . I c 0 PROPOSED MASTER PLAN FOR sisaaya D iii ��d D o 04 e� "'° art PIti 4 8 m SALVATION ARMY PETALUMA CENTER slabs i �W;a � i~� a.• a; % 'h1 ='J u < a 5 �q� N m m i3 721 So. McDOWELL BLVD. PETA ,.CA. o„2 °'3n d wnidlDd 0/�8 T��,�oa�w os tai a ' LI l'-'4.:.G c o,- bFM?, o CC Li ��'Q4 b?a4 P 9-63 EI 1ND b IN(l b'lgd Jll/VEI`d NOIIVA1VS z o N — gas n3 iVh ' 0a s««I<' < 1 �u yi pq, >.�Od NV-1d N91SVW a9SOd0»d ii '_ 5 a s 8 e a e y C o$ a W O, ,. 0 0_ E !EA ft :aoaLLAI Pat igt ON Iii fi COC va. um i iii agog iari 4fl' ' a—. Q I W it ire Q •ct ON law cca I j e 013 0 11 OM Z ,_ w rr.,1 \ — '� 0 _` W Im . am °' 0 � i L He ;� Lci 4" :" N cr o te ,o4 lb a . , § , < . Z . ... , , R: —1 h li7 1 —I hrill I. , uf^ 1 .-r is NE I ,' ®' O cY 7 y-t a t o_ _ �� Q gi e Cg —J !' -: �� L LL 4 t'iF■1tt:. $ ,� I I- ALA? `r� j MCI 0 I I _ v 1 gem iii sa,° L h r 0 ®fi /- 33 5 -.. ..p` m I {l rill Z t} iii} I —m �i� t , r,�I t It n: W W I =1- H lira ®®: .e i - u) 9; fP ®®'d m r ri ,_. : " 0 • 6 • • - _ : - ■ _.----- ... --_-_- A it l 1. • C� °� i �. a A o. ^ < / --3 D _ � 4V N CP CD i ( 9 .. A , ', ,it\ o iriI ;', iti; 2 ,. ' I ' / I — \_ r N lir ilk r ii i i� o SI f z yt 'I ,, • IliVir r, 1, : I i 1 /r c-, 1 , .p c i ` ____... o N 2 m 2 Spb in ?: \ _—_. '91 °� 3-' 1 \ PEE i rl / CA 0 vE i - - —C / r! \ g % u n o m r �. LI IS,r id 8 ® ( J IS 16\ ni < .-_ii g ' €; 4 Hit h s _m N:4 t v . x n 3 _ "`111 �.. / , N € g I xi 4 I 3 m R c z - 0-'1.: $'. `I _ in V /�,- �'S 'i�'r —.iL\\...�.5.��?' t` < Y' \ ;•;' S e 0 ;{y\ �� I.( "—�r x. � ( V �_ ii4{� << ]�Jj 0 vt r �yy.��✓- ' i 1 p O i A < N O O D O it?A✓� N �x0P# � t I\ 1 n r I • n fi - iE oo N 4 L J ;:got. A _ g .___ - -_ o o p .1 n s 5 D s ��VV D ' Q 4 i o P.E , . g A A r 8 Ai g p I n N r A a N o Q ', 4 'd ... O A io �\ i PE E -' i i� r .n p p ti d P i n - 2 4 4 4 q 4 2 4 4 . o o n 2 3295 c i r m PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR: 4Fli 3 ° — r ° th T a- II , d `az o3 ?'^, r„--i w D SALVATION ARMY PETALUMA CENTER ii e ri r n Z 721 So. McDOWELL BLVD, PETAL, CA 3 3'`