HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 06/25/2001 (24) ri•;
M
City of Petaluma, California
Memorandum
City Manager's Office,11 English Street,Petaluma, CA 94952
(707) 778-4345 Fax(707) 778-4419 E-mail:citpmgr@ci.petaluma.ca.us
DATE: June 23, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bill Thomas, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Replacement Page for Budget
The attached update page replaces page "S-70" in your budget.
Thanks.
•1
s'
CITY OF PETALUMA,,CA
TRANSFERS IN/OUT SUMMARY
• i"sC.r x)
General Fund
From Gas Tax $ 800,000
From Transient Occupancy Tax 775,000
From PCDC 25,000
From Turning Basin 12,000
Administrative Charges:
CDBG 5,150
PCDC(901) 25,200
PCDC(902) 189,750
Housing(903) 34,000
Water 896,200
Transit 67,000
Airport 54,000
Ambulance 120,000
Marina 36,000
Debt Service 5,250
•
Landscape Assessment District 13;000
PCDC from Flood Mitigation 2,000,000
Housing from Housing In-Lieu Fund 1,149,518
Supplemental Law Enforcement 142,500
Transient Occupancy Tax . .
300,000
Traffic Mitigation 2,839,000
Debt Service 743,250
Employee Benefits 600;000
TOTAL TRANSFERS IN $ 10,831,818
l _ :I'°It 1 EANSFERSOO F if r „a;:;
General Fund:
r _.
•; Landscape Maintenance Districts 13,000 To pay down LAD's deficit retained earnings
Employee Benefits 600,000 Retirements
Debt Service 233,600 Street Light Debt&Banc One Lease
Gas Tax to General Fund 800,000 In support of the General Fund
Asset Seizure to L.E.Supplemental. 142,500 To support CAD/RMS project
Transient Occupancy to General Fund 775,000 In support of the General Fund
Park Development Fees for Debt Service 509,650 Debt Service for Comm.Cu.Debt
Flood Mitigation Fees to PCDC(902) 2,000,000 Repayment of Flood Control Costs
Housing in Lieu Fees to Housing 1,149,518 For Housing services
Turning Basin to General Fund 12;000 To cover Turning Basing costs
PCDC(901)to General Fund 25,200 Administrative Overhead
PCDC(902)to General Fund 189,750 ,Administrative Overhead
CDBG to General Fund 5,150 Administrative Overhead
Water to General Fund 896,200 Administrative Overhead
Transit to General Fund 67,000 Administrative Overhead
Airport to General Fund 54,000 Administrative Overhead
Ambulance to General Fund 120,000 Administrative Overhead
Marina to General Fund 36,000 Administrative Overhead
Debt Service to General'Fund 5,250 Administrative Overhead
Housing(903)to General Fund 34,000 Administrative Overhead
Water to Traffic Mitigation, 178,000 Street Resurfacing
Sewer to Traffic Mitigation 65,000 Street Resurfacing
Water to Traffic Mitigation 351.000 McDowell/Washington Intersection
PCDC toTraffic Mitigation 1,300,000 McDowell/Washington Intersection
Drainage to Traffic Mitigation ..288,000 Bodega Avenue Widening
Water to Traffic Mitigation 444,000 Bodega Avenue Widening
Sewer to Traffic Mitigation 213,000 Bodega Avenue Widening
PCDC(902)to Transient Occupancy Tax. 300,000 Support Petaluma Visitor's Program
PCDC(901)to General Fund 25,000 Support foot patrol in Downtown Area
• TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT $ 10,831,818
JUN 2 5 2001 • 1 1
City of Petaluma, California
• Memorandum
City Manager's Office, 11 English Street,Petatunla, CA 94952
(707) 778-4345 Fax(707) 778-4419 E-mail:.citpmgrna,ctpetaluma.ca.us
DATE: June 22, 2001
TO: Mayor and Members.of the City Council
FROM: Frederick C. Stouder, City Manager
SUBJECT: Recommendation for Adoption of City of Petaluma 2001/2002 Budget
On Monday, you will receive resolutions that officially adopt the City of Petaluma FY 2001-
2002 Budget. The Budget is recommended for adoption after seven scheduled public review
sessions, of which one could not be conducted because of Councilmembers' schedules and other
unanticipated conflicts.
111. Budget was presented to the City Council on Monday, May 7th, pursuant to the City of
Petaluma Charter (a date that had not been met for several decades). Last year, the City Council
also received the Budget in May and sufficient,review time before adoption on June26,
2000. In the past several years of budget processes and adoption, improvements to the financial
condition of the City have been'realized, more time has been;scheduled for review, and budget
presentations themselves have become clearer and more explanatory.
The Budget, as presented for adoption, is balanced with the reserves that were established the
last two years and are maintained at $1,600,000 for the'General Fund Reserve, $1,000,000 for
the Equipment Replacement Fund Reserve, and $250,000 for Street Improvement Reserve. As
last year, the Budget is balanced based'on revenues anticipated for the 12 month budget period,
not based on cash carryover from a previous year, orunspent, unobligated prior funds.
However, extensive cuts the past two years have been made, and the Budget is balanced by a
freeze on 10 positions. The economy remains uncertain, and after several years of dramatic
growth in revenue„sales and some other revenues are expected to remain generally flat.
As noted, the Budget,as recommended for adoption, reflects continual refinement in the
presentation, process, and organization of the financialdocument. Individual Department
Performance Measurements are becoming more specific, and revenue and expenditure linkages
are becoming clearer: Budget,expenditures and the costs of doing the public's business are
illustrated on the(same page with the sources of income or revenue for paying for the service or
cost. A major challenge remains to create and focus on more revenue alternatives if service
levels are to remain as they are.
Several major policy recommendations still are under review by the City Council. These include •
"The Feasibility of Restructuring the Sidewalk Maintenance Program to Place Higher Emphasis
on Homeowners' Responsibility for Maintenance of Sidewalks', and "Enhanced Street
Maintenance and Reconstruction Program". Meetings will be scheduled at the Council's
convenience the next several months to further review these and other initiatives.
The City Council may also wish to schedule a further review session for long-range existing
perceived capital needs,as part of the early discussions of the General Plan. As part of the
approval:of the Budget,the City Council could adopt the one year recommended expenditures of
the capital projects as identified, but defer any further multi-year capital improvement program
approvals until the City Council has more review and discussion time.
d:/manager/stoudedfs060 lac
•
•