HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1751 N.C.S. 01/17/1989 - ~ s
- ~
FEB 16 1989
ORDINANCE NO. 175.1. N.C.S.
Introduced by Councilman Seconded by Councilman
Vice Mayor Davis Brian Sobel
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. ,
AS AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 00?-022-12,
21, 25-28, 34, 39, 41, 48, 57, 59
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Petaluma as follows:
Section 1. The City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed
with the City Council on January 9, 1989, .its report as set forth in its
minutes of December 13, 1988, (File No. 3.384) , recommending the
adoption of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. , as
amended, by reclassifying and rezoning certain lands being more
particularly described as .Assessor's Parcel Numbers 007-022-12, 21,
25-28, 34, 39, 41,, 48, 57, ~arid 5'9 from. R-T, 6500 (Single Family
Residential) to RMG (Garden Apartments) .
Section 2. The .City Council` further ..finds that said Planning
Commission held a public hearing on said. proposed amendment to
Zoning Ordinance. No. 1072 N.C.S., as amended, on December 13,
1988, after giving notice of said hearing in the manner, for the period
and in the form required by said Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. , as
amended.
Section 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072
N.C.S. , as amended, the. City Council finds as follows:
1. That the proposed rezoning will make the zoning consistent with
the General Plan.
2. That state law and local policy call for consistency between zoning
and General Plan band use designations.
3. That public necessity, convenience, and general welfare permit
the adoption of the proposed amendment.
- -
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072
N.C.S. , as amend"ed, and based upon the evidence it has received and
- in accordance with the findings made., the City Council hereby adopts
amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No 1072 N. C. S, so as to
reclassify- and rezone said property hereinbefore referred to in
accordance with. the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Section 5. The City Council finds that the proposal is categorically
exempt from CEQA under Section 6.4.5 of the City's local CEQA
- guidelines.
Section 6. The .City Clerk is hereby directed to post this ordinance
for the period and in the manner required by the City Charter.
INTRODUCED and ordered posted this 9th day of January 1989.
ADOPTED this 17th day of January 1989, by the following vote:
v-
- AYES: Cavanagh, Tencer° -•W,oolsey, ~ Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis
Mayor Hillgo s -
NOES : 0 ~
ABSENT: Sobel
Attest: r ~
M r
G~:~~l Approved:
City Clerk City Attorney
ord. alma. ctiresol0
Ord. 1751 N..C.S.