HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2026-01 03/10/2026PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-01
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA
UPHOLDING THE DIRECTOR’S DECISION TO APPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE
PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW, SUBJECT TO REVISED CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL, FOR THE WASATCH SELF STORAGE PHASE II PROJECT LOCATED
AT 85 CORONA ROAD (APN 150-020-041) AND DENYING THE APPEAL FILED BY
MR. EDWIN BRADLEY ON BEHALF OF MS. DEANNA O’BRIEN, CITY RECORD NO.:
PLSR-2024-0020
WHEREAS, WSP Petaluma, LLC submitted an application for Administrative Site Plan
and Architectural Review (SPAR) (City Record No. PLSR-2024-0020) proposing the conversion
of the existing two-story building formerly occupied by the Petaluma Valley Athletic Club into
an indoor-access self-storage facility and outdoor recreational vehicle (RV) storage area at 85
Corona Road (APN 150-020-041) in the City of Petaluma; and
WHEREAS, the project proposes to convert the approximately 20,730-square-foot
building into approximately 170 indoor self-storage units, construct minor building additions
including an elevator shaft and covered loading area, convert the existing paved parking lot into
an 18-space outdoor RV storage area, and complete exterior site improvements including
fencing, landscaping, lighting, parking lot modifications, and architectural enhancements; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located within the Rancho Arroyo Planned Community
Development (PCD) zoning district and the Community Commercial General Plan land use
designation; and
WHEREAS, the Rancho Arroyo PCD permits mini-storage facilities as a principally
permitted use, and the proposed conversion of the existing building to self-storage is therefore a
permitted use subject to applicable development standards and Site Plan and Architectural
Review; and
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2025, the Planning Director approved Administrative Site
Plan and Architectural Review for the project, subject to conditions of approval, after
determining that the project as conditioned is exempt from further environmental review under
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), consistent with the City of Petaluma General
Plan 2025, and complies with Rancho Arroyo Business Park Planned Community Development
zoning regulations and applicable Implementing Zoning Ordinance regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Director determined that the project qualifies for a categorical
exemption from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and
15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) in that the project involves the
adaptive reuse of an existing structure with minor exterior modifications and limited new
construction; and
WHEREAS, on December 22, 2025, Mr. Edwin Bradley of Raff Law Firm filed an
appeal of the Director’s decision on behalf of Ms. Deanna O’Brien, owner of property located at
95 Old Corona Road, citing concerns related to potential noise, outdoor vehicle storage,
Docusign Envelope ID: A8D2F26F-F210-4F8C-9597-06AD3AE6359C
construction impacts, landscaping and stormwater management, and communication with project
management; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Division reviewed the concerns raised in the appeal, worked
with the project applicant to refine project design, and revised the Conditions of Approval to
address potential impacts to adjacent residential uses, including measures related to sound
attenuation, fencing, landscaping, construction management, and site operations; and
WHEREAS, revised Conditions of Approval dated March 10, 2026, have been prepared
to incorporate these revisions and ensure compliance with applicable City standards;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal
on March 10, 2026, at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard
and the Planning Commission considered the staff report, project materials, appeal
documentation, and all public testimony received; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission independently reviewed the record, including the
Director’s approval, the appeal materials, the staff report and attachments, and the revised
Conditions of Approval.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS FOLLOWS:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
2. Based on its review of the entire record herein, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
California Environmental Quality Act
The proposed project is eligible for a categorical exemption under Section 15301 (Existing
Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which allows modifications
to existing structures, and under Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures), which involves construction and location of limited numbers of new, small
facilities or structures such as accessory structures, in that the exterior modifications result in
minor increase in the overall building size similar in scope to the construction of small
facilities or accessory structures.
General Plan Consistency Findings
The General Plan land use designation for the site is Community Commercial, which is
intended for shopping centers and commercial districts, including regionally oriented centers
developed at a maximum floor area ratio of 1.2:1. The project is also located within the
Petaluma Blvd. North Planning Sub Area, which lies between Highway 101, the western
edge of the urban growth boundary, and Washington Street. The project conforms to the
intent of the Community Commercial land use designation in that it allows for commercial
use of the property for local-serving and regionally oriented commercial activity, and the
proposed floor area ratio of 0.39:1 is within the maximum floor area ratio allowed by the
General Plan.
Docusign Envelope ID: A8D2F26F-F210-4F8C-9597-06AD3AE6359C
The project is also consistent with the following General Plan Guiding Principles and
Policies:
1. Guiding Principle 11, which promotes reuse of buildings to meet changing
community needs.
2. Section 1.1 (p.1-2), which states that “new development under the General Plan seeks
to infill existing vacant and underutilized sites within the UGB that are not
environmentally constrained.
3. Policy 1-P-48, which requires that “all new development provides necessary public
facilities to support the development” and contributes fair-share infrastructure costs.
4. Policy 2-P-116: which states that “Street trees shall be preserved and their numbers
increased as development/redevelopment/remodeling occurs.”
5. Policy 4-P-16: which requires dust, emissions, and equipment management practices
during construction.
Rancho Arroyo Planned Community Development District Finding
The proposed self-storage facility is consistent with the development standards of the Rancho
Arroyo Planned Community District, including height, setbacks, lot coverage, and open
space. Lights provided to illuminate the parking lot shall be arranged to reflect the light away
from adjacent properties and streets (downward lighting). Lighting standards shall not exceed
twenty (20) feet in height and be consistent with the architectural design of on-site buildings
in terms of style, color, and materials.
Construction of the proposed Outdoor RV Storage facility and implementation of the land
use are subject to adoption of a zoning text amendment amending the Rancho Arroyo PCD to
allow Outdoor RV Storage as a permitted Accessory Use. Conditions of approval limit action
to construct the facility or implement this land use until after the City Council decides on the
proposed amendment.
Implementing Zoning Ordinance Findings:
a. The Project, as presented and subject to conditions of approval, complies with all
development standards of the Rancho Arroyo Business Park Planned Community
Development adopted by the City Council on October 11, 1983, and applicable
development standards and regulations contained in the City’s Implementing Ordinance.
b. The Project, as presented and subject to conditions of approval, complies with the
allowable land uses and planning permit requirements of the Rancho Arroyo Business
Park Planned Community Development adopted by the City Council on October 11,
1983, and applicable development standards and regulations contained in the City’s
Implementing Ordinance.
c. The project complies with Implementing Zoning Ordinance §24.050 – Site Plan and
Architectural Review, including the Standards for Review of Applications in Section
24.050.E, as stated in the PLSR-2024-0020 “Administrative SPAR Approval Letter dated
December 12, 2025” which is incorporated herein, in that the Planning Commission finds
as follows:
Docusign Envelope ID: A8D2F26F-F210-4F8C-9597-06AD3AE6359C
1. The project uses quality materials and the overall design is harmonious and in
proportion in itself and in relation to adjacent development, based on the following:
a. The architectural style is appropriate for the project, and compatible with the
character of the neighborhood in that the architectural style and materials of
the existing two-story building will remain largely unchanged, with new paint
over the existing stucco and brick veneer, new paint on the metal stairs and
rails, and a stone accent at the new elevator tower, and these changes will
update and enhance the appearance of the existing building.
b. The siting of the structures on the property is appropriate for the site and as
compared to the siting of other structures in the neighborhood in that the siting
of the existing structure will not change, and the main entrance will remain on
the south side of the building, opposite the existing single-family residence on
the adjacent property to the north.
c. The size, location, design, color, number, lighting, and materials of all signs
and outdoor advertising structures is in accordance with all applicable
requirements of this Zoning Ordinance and appropriate for the site and
compatible with the character of the neighborhood in that the project does not
propose any signs, and if signage is proposed, a separate Sign Permit would
be required, subject to Planning review.
d. The bulk, height, and color of any proposed structure is appropriate for the
site and as compared to the bulk, height, and color of other structures in the
neighborhood in that the existing bulk of the structure will have minimal
changes, with three small additions totaling 461 square feet (approximately
2% of the existing size) located on the south and west sides of the building,
and the building's height will remain unchanged. The main body of the
building will be painted a dark tan with light tan accents at portions of the
first-floor elevation and a medium tan color at the parapet. The bulk, height,
and color are appropriate for the site in that the modifications are minor and
enhance the appearance of the building. No additions are proposed on the
north side of the building, and all modifications harmonize with the existing
building.
2. Landscaping in accordance with applicable City standards, and that is appropriate for
the site and compatible with the character of the neighborhood, will be provided on
the site. Existing trees shall be preserved wherever possible, and shall not be removed
unless approved by the Planning Commission.
Existing landscaping along the frontage of the project site consists of eight trees,
which will be retained and maintained by pruning to remove branches in contact with
the ground. Two Zelkova Serrata will be added to the frontage tree plantings adjacent
to the entry gate. Eleven California Wax Myrtle trees will be planted along the north
side of the building to provide screening for the adjacent residence, and nine
Columnar Zelkova trees will be planted along the building façade at the southwest
corner and to the west of the new elevator shaft. Six Zelkova Serrata will be planted
Docusign Envelope ID: A8D2F26F-F210-4F8C-9597-06AD3AE6359C
on the east and west sides of the building. Six Columnar Red Maples will be planted
along the southern property line.
3. Ingress, egress, internal circulation for bicycles and automobiles, off-street
automobile and bicycle parking facilities and pedestrian ways are designed so as to
promote safety and convenience and conform to applicable City standards. Any plans
pertaining to pedestrian, bicycle, or automobile circulation have been routed to the
Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee for review and approval or
recommendation.
No change to circulation would result from the proposed building remodel; therefore,
the project was not routed to the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee. A new
gate will be added at the driveway entrance, recessed 27 feet from the front property
line and 45 feet from the street curb.
4. The design is of good character and has been prepared by a professional designer,
such as an architect, landscape architect or other practicing urban designer or person
with equivalent skill and qualifications.
The project and site design are appropriate for the commercial application. Adequate
space is provided in the parking lot for loading and unloading, and the changes to the
building color enhance the building’s appearance. The project designs were prepared
by licensed civil engineers, architects, and landscape architects with local experience
in commercial development.
5. The application and the project for which it seeks approval are exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
6. The proposed structure and use, subject to any conditions which may apply, conforms
with the applicable requirements of this Zoning Ordinance and applicable policies
and programs of the City’s General Plan and any applicable specific plan, and the
proposed use will not, under the circumstances of the conditional use application,
constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community.
3. Based on its review of the entire record herein, including the March 10, 2026, Planning
Commission staff report, all supporting, referenced, and incorporated documents, including
Exhibit A – Revised Conditions of Approval, and Attachment 6 “PLSR-2024-0020
Administrative SPAR Approval Letter dated December 12, 2025” which is incorporated
herein, and all comments received and the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby:
a. Denies the appeal submitted by Mr. Edwin Bradley of Raff Law Firm on behalf of Ms.
Deanna O’Brien on December 22, 2025; and
b. Upholds the Director’s decision to approve Administrative Site Plan and Architectural
Review for the Wasatch Self Storage Phase II project at 85 Corona Road (APN 150-020-
041); and
c. Approves the project as revised and subject to the Revised Conditions of Approval dated
March 10, 2026, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
Docusign Envelope ID: A8D2F26F-F210-4F8C-9597-06AD3AE6359C
ADOPTED this 10th day of March 2026, by following vote:
Commission Member Aye No Absent Abstain
Ebner X
Goldman X
Mozes X
Newell X
Racusen X
Schildt X
Barnacle X
Jessica Mozes, Chair
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Andrew Trippel, Planning Manager Wendy Dau, Assistant City Attorney
Docusign Envelope ID: A8D2F26F-F210-4F8C-9597-06AD3AE6359C
3/24/2026
3/24/2026
3/26/2026