HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1688 N.C.S. 06/15/1987'~.- fr..~ d:-~ '3
F t~. "' -'
F
~~ j
.+• -',~
- ~ -k ~~1L !~..:: 197
~~~~a+..
ORDINANCE NO.
Introduced by Councilman
Seconded by Councilman
Brian Sobel
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1072 N.C.S. , AS
AMENDED, BY RECLASSIFYING AND PREZONING
AP NO. 019-110-36 TO R-l, 6,,500 AND AP NO. 019-110-34 TO
R-1, 10, 000 AND R-1, 20, ODO.
(LANDS OF HOAG AND HEFFLER)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of .Petaluma as follows:
Section 1. The. City Council finds that the Planning Commission filed
with the City Council. on June 1, 1987, its report as 'set forth in its
minutes of May 12, 1987, concerning the adoption of amendments to
Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. , as amended, by reclassifying and
rezoning certain lands being more particularly described as Assessor's
Parcel Number 019-110-36 to R-1, 6, 500 square feet and Assessor's
Parcel Number 019-110-34 to R-1, I0, 000 and R-l, 20, 000 square feet
per Exhibit A .
Section 2. The City Council further finds that said Planning
Commission. held public hearings on ..said proposed amendments to
Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.G.S. , as amended, on May 12, 1987 after
giving notice. :of said hearing in the :manner, for the period and in the
form required by said Ordinance No~. 1072 N.C.S. , as amended.
Section 3'.. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072
N. C.>S. , as_ amended, the City Council .finds the proposed prezoning to
be in general conformity with the Petaluma General Plan. and. further
finds the following:
1.65"8 N.C.S.
ORD . 6 8`8 NCS
1. The prezoning is in the best interest of the City of Petaluma.
2. The. prezoning shall not constitute an expansion of the existing
Sphere of Influence or water service boundary line.
3. That the proposed prezoning is in general conformity with the
Petaluma General Plan.
4. That the public necessity, convenience and general welfare
require or clearly permit the adoption of the proposed prezoning.
5. That the existing and anticipated environmental impacts will be
adequately evaluated prior to the submission of any development
proposal and appropriate mitigation measures incorporated into the
consideration of any proposed development..
Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No . 1072
N.C.S. , as amended, and based upon the evidence it has received and
in accordance with the findings made, the City Council hereby adopts
amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. so as to
reclassify and rezone said property hereinbefore referred to.
Section 5. The City Council finds that '.the requirements of California
Environmental Quality Act._ Guidelines:, Section `15083 have been satisfied
and hereby incorporates by reference the Mitigated Negative
Declaration prepared and approved for',the proposed prezoning.
Section 6.. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post this Ordinance
.for the period and in the manner required by the City Charter.
INTRODUCED and ordered posted this lst day of June 1987.
ADOPTED this 15th day of June ,1987 by the following vote:
AYES: SOBEL, WOOLSEY, BALSHAW, VICE r1AY0R TENCER
Ord . 16 88. NCS
O i
NOES: DAVIS, CAVANAGH;, r1AY0R HILLIGOSS
ABSENT: p
Attest:
/"'~- f
Approved:
City Clerk City A o ey
ord. hoag. heffler/reso7 '
Ord . 16 8-.8 NCS