Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2005-087 N.C.S. 06/06/2005 Resolution No. Zoos-os~ N.C. S. of the City of Petaluma, California A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) FOR ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS APN 019-210-010, -011, -026, -038 & -039 AND 019-220-012 & -027; FILE No. 03-GPA-0560, COMPRISING A 46.8-ACRE PROJECT AREA KNOWN AS THE LOMAS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT 1500-1600 PETALUMA BOULEVARD SOUTH, PURSUANT TO THE CORTESE/KNOX LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1985 WHEREAS, after public review and input, the City Council of the City of Petaluma adopted under Resolution No.2005-025 N.C.S., the Negative Declaration for the Lomas Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, in order to implement the project it is necessary to annex properties known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 019-210-010, -011, -026, -038 & -039 and 019-220-012 & 027. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act (Government Code 35000 et. Seq.) the Petaluma City Council hereby supports application to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Sonoma County for a proposed reorganization as follows: An annexation of an approximately 46.8 acres located at 1500-1600 Petaluma Boulevard South, known as assessor's parcel numbers 019-210-010, -011, -026, -038 & -039 and 019-220- 012 & -027, to the corporate boundaries of the City of Petaluma; Said territory is comprised of several separate parcels that have been used for quarry and industrial uses, known as the Dutra Quarry or the Petaluma Quarry. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for the requested organization are: 1. The property is contiguous to -the City and is within the adopted Sphere of Influence and General Plan Urban Limit Line of the City of Petaluma. 2. The City has completed an environmental review process for the area, which culminated in the approved Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3. The authorized agent of the owners of said property has initiated said annexation. 4. By Ordinance No. 2211 N.C.S., the City of Petaluma has pre-zoned the affected 46.8- acres to PUD- Planned Unit District and adopted a unit development plan and development standards for the project. Resolution No. 2005-087 N.C.S. 5. The annexation is consistent with the objectives and policies of the General Plan, as documented in the Ordinance to pre-zone the property and the Resolution approving the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map for the Lomas Subdivision. 6. This annexation will enable several provisions of the General Plan to be achieved including: orderly improvement of City infrastructure, preservation of the city's Urban Limit Line, and preservation of County land use including residential and agricultural uses. BE IT FURTHER RES®LVED that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and its Guidelines have been satisfied and thoroughly addressed in the Negative Declaration adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2005-025 N.C.S., on February 15, 2005, and herein incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City shall conduct an analysis of a larger annexation area as deemed necessary to address concerns regarding the creation of a "county island" -that is, unincorporated territory surrounded by the City -that would result from annexation of the subject property. All costs associated with analysis of a larger annexation area, including conducting a sentiment survey of expanded annexation area, shall be the responsibility of the project sponsor. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Executive Officer of the Sonoma County Local Agency Formation Commission, Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting orm on the .........6.`h day of .....:..Iune......................................, 20.D5., by the following vote: Ci Attorney AYES: Canevaro, Vice Mayor Harris, Healy, Nau NOES: Mayor Glass, Torliatt ABSENT: ~ ~ None ~ ABSTAINED: O'Brien ' ATTEST: ~~/C~~.,~~.t~.1C.../ ....~1~1: City Clerk Mayor Council File Res. No........a0O5~087........N.GS.