HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 03/05/2001
~~
[~
L1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
March 5, 2001
City of Petaluma, California
Minutes of a Regular
City Council Meeting
Vol. 35, Page 487
Monday, March 5, 2001
Council Chambers
The Petaluma City Council met on this date at 7:05 P.M. in the Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson, Council Member Healy, Council Member
Maguire, Council Member Moynihan, Council Member O'Brien., Mayor
Thompson, and Council Member Torliatt
ABSENT: None
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Thompson asked representatives of the Girl Scouts to lead the Pledge of
Allegiance.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Dusty Resneck 110 Purrington Road spoke regarding the Lynch Creek Tree Planting,
acknowledged the 75 community volunteers and thanked City Management and the
Council its success; he hoped that the City would finish the link with a bridge crossing and
offered to volunteer planting of native plants.
Andy Rodgers 1151 Debbie Hill Road, provided an update on the Water Foundation.
Harvey Goldberg, Petaluma River Properties, reported that. he was doing indigenous plants
on the river trail and was looking for volunteers for the project.
Terence Garvey, 83 Maria Drive, spoke in support of 'traditional families' and in opposition
to domestic partnership unions.
Lockwood Saunders - BOS Electric, 1028 Aspen Way, spoke in opposition to the City
requiring PLA at the Lok Marina Hotel project.
Tom LeDuc -LeDuc and Dexter Inc., P. O. Box 11157 Santa Rosa, spoke in opposition to
the City requiring PLA.at the Lok Marina Hotel project.
Vol. 35, Page 488 March 5, 2001
1
2 Jerry Minton -Minton Electric Inc., 1125 Enos Way, spoke in opposition to the City
3 requiring PLA at the Lok Marina Hotel project.
4
5 Eric Christen -Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction, 2320 Courage Drive #110
6 Fairfield, spoke in opposition to the City requiring PLA at the Lok Marina Hotel project.
7
8 A. J. Levis 12 Parkside Terrace, spoke regarding leash law enforcement and other
9 solutions for concerns he expressed about Oak Hill Park.
10
11 Mary Crawford, 12 Parkside Terrace, spoke regarding leash law enforcement and other
12 solutions for concerns he has at Oak Hill Park.
13
14 Geoff Cartwright 56 Rocca Drive spoke regarding the upcoming water forum on March 9 at
15 the Santa Rosa Veterans Building at 7:.00 P.M.
16
17 Diane Reilly-Torres, Rainier Avenue, spoke regarding the Brown Act and stated she was
18 not satisfied with a response she received from the City Attorney regarding the Council's
19 Closed Session business.
20
21 Yoke Dellahay, 1283 - 8th Street, spoke in opposition to the closing of the City's only
22 movie theater and about the condition of 8th Street; he wanted the street replaced.
23
24
Mary Glardon, Rushmore Avenue, spoke regarding the council working together with a
2 5 spirit of cooperation towards the completion of the General Plan.
26
27
28 CORRESPONDENCE
29
3 0 None
31
32 COUNCIL COMMENTS AND LIAISON REPORTS
33
34 Council Member Torliatt:
3 5 - Asked City Management to schedule on an upcoming agenda a discussion for the
3 6 Council to have regarding monies to fund the Local Agency Formation Commission
3 7 (LAFCO).
3 8 - Reported she had attended the recent tree planting along the Lynch Creek Trail and
39 thanked Dusty Resneck, Don Waxman and the Bicycle Advisory Committee; they
40 planted a total of 122 trees and some rose bushes.
41
42 Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson:
43 - Reported she attended a forum regarding Alameda Transportation Tax.
44 - Thanked Dusty Resneck, Don Waxman for their efforts regarding the Lynch Creek
45
46 Trail planting.
- Noted that the Petaluma Chapter of the American Cancer Society had a program
47 entitled "Locks of Love;" six ponytails could make a wig for cancer patients.
~~~°
March 5, 2001 Vol. 35, Page 489
1 - Commented on Andy Richardson and the Boy Scouts regarding democracy.
2 - Expressed her concerns about the closing of General Plan item lacked sufficient
3 notification to the public.
4 - Stated she supported union labor 100%.
5
6 Council Member Maguire expressed that the closure of the movie theater on the northeast
~ side of town presented an opportunity to open theater in the downtown area.
8
9
1o Council Member O'Brien:
11 - Read a letter from the Planning Commission that addressed issues they had with
12 the decision making process regarding the Basin Street Property Project and
13 recommending the scheduling land use, and applications for development be
14 brought to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation.
15 - Attended the North Bay Watershed meeting -nothing major to report mostly
16 housekeeping; a water seminar may be scheduled.
1~ - Thanked City Management, and acknowledged Katie Crump, the Executive
18 Assistant to the City Manager, for the consideration shown to him and his family
19 during the heavy times they endured due to the loss of his father.
2 0 - Commented on the quality of police services in Petaluma and noted that he had
21 had recently gone on a ride along with members of the police department.
22 - Noted that in Petaluma, $1 million dollars was raised for the American Cancer
2 3 Society
24
25 Council Member Moynihan:
26 - Apologized to the public for the cancellation of the afternoon meeting;
2 ~ - Acknowledged Boy Scouts Troop 3 and Sea Scouts Troop 1 who helped with tree
2 8 planting at the recent Lynch Creek Trail event.
29 - Noted that he was the only attendee at the Traffic Committee meeting.
3 0 - Discussed the results of the Pavement Management Study and challenged Council
31 to budget $5 million for street maintenance this year.
32
33 Council Member Pamela Torliatt:
34 - Reported on the Water Advisory Committee (WAC) meeting noted that the rate
3 5 increase was attributed to Amendment 11 and undefined additional legal fees.
36
37 Council Member Healy:
38 - Attended the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) meeting and
3 9 discussed GARVEE bonds; grant anticipation bonds as a solution for transportation
4 0 issues -SCTA authorized staff to move forward. The Sub-Committee's first meeting
41 regarding a tax measure for the 2002 ballot included Supervisor Kerns, Jake
42 Mackenzie, Cotati, Sharon Wright, Santa Rosa and himself.
43
44 CITY MANAGEMENT COMMENTS
45
46 None
t~
~~
Vol. 35, Page 490 March 5, 2001
1 _
2 PROCLAMATIONS
3
4 Mayor Thompson read a proclamation acknowledging Kelsey Salvestrin, one of the top
5 honorees of the Prudential Spirit of Community Award Winner, with her outstanding
6 volunteer efforts to the community.
7
8 'Mayor Thompson read a proclamation acknowledging Girl Scout Week March 11 -March
9 17 and presented it to representatives of the organization present.
10
11 AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS
12
13 Council removed the following items from the agenda and rescheduled them to a date
14 uncertain pending Council Member consultations with legal counsel regarding their conflict
15 of interest issues.
16
17 22. Discussion on Work Program, Budget and Schedule for Implementation of Central
18 Petaluma Specific Plan.
19
2 0 23. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding the Processing of Development
21 ~4pplications Within the Boundaries of the Draft Central Petaluma Specific Plan
22
23
24
PRESENTATION
25
2 6 Introduction/Presentation of Youth Activities by the Petaluma Youth Commission and
27 Teen Council (20 Minutes).
28
2 9 Recreation and Parks Commission Jim Carr provided background information and a
3 0 summary of the status of the Youth Commission and Teen Council and activities
31
32 Dave King, Petaluma Youth Commission, progress report and asked that the City Clerk
3 3 actively pursue recruitments for the Teen. Council as their tenure ended in June 30, 2001.
34
3 5 Becca Purdue, Petaluma Teen Council provided a status report and accomplishments of
3 6 the Teen Council.
37
3 8 Council Member Healy stated that he would like to have a joint meeting of the Council and
3 9 the Teen Council.
40
41 Council Member Pamela Torliatt expressed that she would like to have Teen Council
42 members attend City Council meetings on a regular basis and asked the information come
43 back to the Council on the matter.
44
45 CONSENT CALENDAR
46
47 19. Resolution Approving Amendment to Employment Contract with City Attorney for
~Q~.
March 5, 2001 Vol. 35, Page 491
1 Legal Services (Stouder).
2
3 Removed, rescheduled to a date uncertain.
4
5 APPOINTMENTS
6
7 19A. Appoint Council Member Matt Maguire as Council Liaison to the Animal Services
8 Advisory Committee.
9
10 MOTION: Council Member Torliatt moved, seconded by Cader-Thompson, to adopt a
11 resolution 2001 - 049 N.C.S. appointing Matt Maguire as the Council Liaison
12 to the Animal Services Advisory Committee.
13
14 MOTION
15 PASSED: 7/0/0
16
17
18 19B. Recommendation to Mayors' City Selection Committee of the Mayors' and
19 Councilmembers' Association for One Representative to the Bay Area Air Quality
2 o Management District Board (Appointment Expires March 2001).
21
22
23
24 MOTION: Council Member Maguire moved, seconded by Torliatt, to adopt Resolution
25 2001 - 050 N.C.S. appointing Pamela Torliatt as the Council representative
2 6 to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board.
27
2 8 MOTION
29 PASSED: 7/0/0
30
31
3 2 19C. Representative to the Sonoma County Business Energy and Water Conservation
3 3 Task Force.
34
3 5 Council discussion included information that the Task Force may be restructured. Council
36 Member Torliatt agreed to attend the first meeting and return with a report to the Council
37 regarding the future structure of the Task Force.
38
3 9 19D. Appointment of Voting Representative and Alternate for the Association of Bay Area
40 Governments (ABAG) April General Assembly Meeting.
41
42 MOTION: Council Member Maguire moved, seconded by Torliatt to adopt Resolution
43 2001 - 051 N.C.S. appointing Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson as the voting
44 representative for the City at the ABAG April General Assembly meeting.
45
4 6 Council decided not to appoint an alternate and Mayor Thompson asked the Vice Mayor to
Vol. 35, Page 492 March 5, 2001
1 select her alternate.
2
3 MOTION
4 PASSED: 7/0/0
5
6 Recess: 8:50 P.M.
7
8 Reconvene: 9:05 P.M.
9
10 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
11
12 20. (Removed -rescheduled to a date uncertain) Status Report, Continued
13 Discussion, and Possible Action Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into an
14 Agreement With Mardell LLC Regarding the Adobe Creek Weir and Diversion
15 Channel and Directing City Management to Send a Letter to FEMA Withdrawing the
16 City's Appeal of the Letter of Map Revision Upon Execution of Said Agreement.
17 (Continued From February 5 and 21, 2001 Council Meeting).
18
19 21. Discussion of Scope of Work, Schedule and Budget for the General Plan 2000-
2 0 2020 Chapters (Housing; Water Resources; Recreation, Music and Parks;
21 Community and Public Facilities; Public Safety; Traffic and Circulation; Family and
22 Children; Economic Health, Redevelopment, Fiscal Sustainability; Natural
23 Environment and Land Use; Sustainability) and Possible Action Regarding Potential
24 Amendment to Dyett & Bhatia Contract for the Completion of the General Plan.
25 (Continued from February 21, 2001 Council Meeting) (Tuft)
26
27 General Plan Administration Director Pamela Tuft provided background information and a
28 summary of the project to date. She noted that there was no circulation of the staff report
29 to the public as the meeting was for informational purposes and not an effort to receive
3 o public input.
31
32 Public Comment
33
34 Ann Hancock, (County of .Marin -Planner) - P.O. Box 558,Graton, advised that Marin
3 5 County was basing their General Plan on principles of sustainability and looked forward to
3 6 working with the City as they moved forward.
37
3 8 Beverly Alexander, 341 Liberty Street, spoke in support of a general plan based on the
39 principles of sustainability.
40
41 J. T. Wick -Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce commented on the Chamber's
42 involvement with the development of the scope for the economic element. of the General
43 Plan and asked that Council leave that portion alone.
44
45
Richard Brawn, 141 Grevillia Drive, spoke regarding General Plan shortcomings.
46
~~~
March 5, 2001 Vol. 35, Page 493
1 Don Weisenfluh, 903 Kensington Place, spoke in support of a comprehensive General
2 Plan with sustainability principles as its cornerstone.
3
4 Jane Hamilton, 110 "G" Street, spoke in support of a comprehensive General Plan
5 process, not an update, with a window of sustainability built in.
6
7 Beth Meredith, 104 Fifth Street, spoke in support of a comprehensive General Plan
8 process developed within the context of sustainability.
9
1o Stan Gold, 615 King Road, spoke in support of a comprehensive, sustainable General
11 Plan.
12
13 Bill Phillips, 824 Blossom Court, spoke in support of a comprehensive General Plan and
14 emphasized the importance of public outreach.
15
16 Geoff Cartwright, 56 Rocca Drive, expressed his concerns about scaling back components
17 of the General Plan and in opposition to development in the floodplain.
18
19 Bill Kortum, 180 Ely Road, spoke in support of a comprehensive General Plan process.
20
21 Bruce Hagen, 145 Grevillia Drive, spoke in opposition to scaling back the scope of the
22 General Plan; he supported a comprehensive General Plan process based on the
23 principles of sustainability and urged Council not to make a decision without the benefit of
24 public outreach..
25
2 6 Ned Orrett, 620 Second Street, spoke in support of the General Plan as it had been
27 developed., and based on sustainability principles.
28
29 Tiffany Mitchell, 312 Keller Street, spoke in support of a comprehensive, sustainable
3 o General Plan..
31
32 Patricia Tuttle-Brown, South Petaluma Boulevard, expressed her concerns that the scope
3 3 of the General Plan may be scaled; she supported a comprehensive General Plan based
34 on the principles of sustainability.
35
36 Bill White, Basin Street Properties, 1318 Redwood Way #140, spoke in support of the
37 General Plan.
38
39 Majida Gibson, 14 Cherry Street, expressed her discontent with the manner Council
4o approached public input and discussion regarding the General Plan process and
41 expressed her support of a comprehensive General Plan process as designed.
42
43 Rick Theist, Sonoma County Transportation Land Use Coalition., 404 Mendocino Avenue,
44 Santa Rosa, spoke regarding growth and in support of a comprehensive General Process
45 as opposed to updating an existing plan.
46
o~ ~ s-?,
Vol. 35, Page 494 March 5, 2001
1 Scott Vouri, 1557 Mauro Pietro Drive, spoke in support of a comprehensive General Plan _
2 process based on the principles of sustainability as opposed to updating an existing plan;
3 he encouraged Council not to make a decision right now.
4
5 Scott Hess, 100 Union Street, spoke in support of sustainability as the foundation of the
6 General Plan process and urged Council not to make a decision right now.
8 Wayne Miller, 328 Smith Drive, spoke in support of a comprehensive General Plan process
9 based on the principles of sustainability.
10
11 John Mills, 1315 Street, spoke in support of Council making a decision; he voiced his
12 concern about spending time and money developing plans and not implementing them.
13
14 Connie Madden, 215 Water Street, spoke in support of a comprehensive General Plan
15 based on the principles of sustainability.
16
17 Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson supported a comprehensive General Plan and provided
18 examples of the problems the community faced. She thought that it was important to invite
19 the people that live in the community to participate in the Plan process as a guiding
2 0 document for the City's future.
21
22 Council Member Maguire asked what was the problem with the scope of the General Plan
23 to his colleagues, Council Members Healy, Moynihan, O'Brien and Mayor Thompson.
24
2 5 Council Member Healy believed the existing General Plan was a good blueprint for the City
2 6 to proceed with; he like the Black and Veatch plan,. it included a surface water
27 management plan. Dyett and Bhatia was too expensive; the City had some unmet needs
2 8 in the community and he argued that money being paid to consultants was money not used
2 9 to meet those needs, for example, the Central Petaluma Specific Plan, and the Corona
3 0 Reach Specific Plan. He preferred implementation rather than more planning. He
31 understood and wanted to empower members of the community regarding environmental
32 pursuits by having a citizens' committee produce specific plans, General Plan
33 amendments, strategic financial plans; recommend and define their goals supported by
34 City Management with limited consultant hours. He supported the Traffic Circulation plan
3 5 but had questions regarding the Novato Narrows project. He asked Suzanne Wilford when
3 6 CalTrans needed the information about the location of a cross- town connector in Petaluma
3 ~ in order to coordinate with the Narrows project.
38
3 9 Mayor Thompson thought the costs were exorbitant and provided examples. He wanted
4 0 tasks reviewed; there was no money to even fix the streets. He believed it was wasteful to
41 spend the City's money in this way; the Water Resources and Traffic and Circulation
42 Elements needed to be done now.
43
44 Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson did not agree; the 1987 General Plan was out of date. She
45 was disturbed that four Council Members were going to vote on a General Plan for the City.
46
~Q
March 5, 2001 Vol. 35, Page 495
1 Council Member Moynihan stated that a lot of hard work had been done to get to this point
2 and recognized Pamela Tuft and the Senior Management Team for their efforts. The
3 existing General Plan lacked in its economic element. The Land Use Element was also a
4 problem; zoning ordinances were never updated. He was curious about sustainability; he
5 was not able to identify a process that defined it to his satisfaction. He wanted to focus on,
6 in the General Plan update, traffic circulation, that was critical. The Economic
7 Development Element was .good and needed to be implemented first, supported by a
8 citizen's committee from the beginning, not at the end. Regarding the Land Use Element,
9 it needed fo be updated, the City needed to show how it was going to develop. The
1o encompassing plan for the Water and Sewer was too expensive; the City had a beer
11 budget with a champagne appetite. There was no distribution plan for recycled water,
12 inline micro -filtration. He agreed with Mayor Thompson and Council Member Healy, the
13 scope needed to be scaled back.
14
15 Council Member O'Brien expressed his concern about the duplication of efforts and costs
16 and emphasized his concerns about the cost. His immediate focus was on traffic and
17 water; he supported sustainability but wanted it better defined. He stated that he came to
18 this meeting with an open mind and was disturbed that the public stated that they knew
19 how he would vote.
20
21 Council Member Maguire outlined what he heard as his colleagues concerns and
22 addressed each individually. He then quoted from published books items that supported
23 his position, that is, a comprehensive General Plan process based on the principles of
24 sustainability. He argued that costs were minimal in comparison to the benefits of a
25 comprehensive General Plan. There was a need for a community visioning process. He
2 6 urged Council not to scale back the scope of the General Plan and asked Council to
2 7 support it.
28
2 9 Council Member Healy stated that he struggled as he came to the meeting with the hope to
3 0 do away with the Dyett &Bhatia portion and struggled with perhaps suspending the Dyett
3.1 and Bhatia contract and wanting City Management review the proposal and come back
32 with recommendations.
33
3 4 Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson reiterated. that she did not want the Council to make the
3 5 decision now; She expressed that she did not believe that Council Member O'Brien did. not
3 6 have the necessary materials and proceeded to addressed deficiencies in the existing
37 General Plan document.
38
3 9 Council Member Torliatt supported a comprehensive General Plan and provided. a history
40 of the development of the proposed Plan amidst the many changes in City Management
41 over the past three years. She hoped that the public would be involved. She noted that in
42 1987 the Council voted unanimously to adopt the General Plan.. Regarding sustainability,
43 she interpreted it as development that meets the needs of the present without
44 compromising the needs in the future; this community deserved the best.
45
4 6 Council Member Healy stated that local government was easy for public involvement; he
~~
Vol. 35, Page 496 March 5, 2001
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
believed that some of the issues that the public addressed needed to be addressed at a
higher level of government.
MOTION: Council Member Healy moved, seconded by Moynihan to adopt Resolution
2001 - 052 N.C.S. suspending the City's contract with Dyett & Bhatia for the
Compretion of the General Plan 2000 - 2020, with the exception of the Traffic ~°
and Circulation Element and directed City Management to return to Council
with options/recommendations for reduction of the scope of work on the -
General Plan 2000 - 2020 process..
Council Member Maguire was adamant about the necessity to~review existing contracts for
duplication; he did not support stopping the ongoing effort. He asked for unity among his
colleagues to reject the motion, that they review costs noting the burden on staff resources;
he preferred that the Council see if they could reduce the cost in any way. .
Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson, in response to Council Member Healy's comments, asked
that he focus on how the Council of seven could help the community emphasizing how the
Council could dramatically affect the community.
Council Member Torliatt agreed that she identified with three concerns that had been
raised: traffic, economics, and surface water management. She queried how one could ' _~
calculate the cost of a poor planning decision at the front end and urged the Council to do
what was best for the community.
City Manager Fred Stouder noted that there seemed to an air of politicizing.°,before
planning; they were only a month into the contract. City Management's proposal for'th'e
General Plan was recommended because it was thorough and comprehensive. He asked
that Council tell City Management how much they wanted it reduced or by how much and
allow staff to return with recommendations. He asked that Council not ask staff to go back
over two years of work.
Mayor Thompson wanted to move forward with the traffic and circulation elements and to
and discontinue moving forward with any more work on the plan. He did not agree with the
City Manager; the General Plan was the most expensive proposal on the table.
Council Member Maguire clarified that the General Plan was the most thorough, the most
comprehensive.
Council Member Moynihan called for the vote.
Council Member O'Brien wanted to suspend the work and have it return to the Council
when the project scope and costs were scaled back. He did not view the vote the Council :~ ~'
was to take as scaling down; he saw it as an opportunity to properly notice the public and
stop any additional financial outlay.
Council Member Cader-Thompson wanted to delay the vote, notice the public and have it
f~
1
4,.
3g~
March 5,,2001. Vol. 35, Page 497
1 return in two weeks.
2
3 Council Member Healy stated that it would not come back in two weeks.
4
5 Council Member Maguire vote it down and give specific direction to staff and have them
6 come back with
7
8 Council Member Moynihan called a Point of Order; he had called for the vote.
9
10 Council Member Healy repeated the motion seconded by Moynihan.
11
12
13 MOTION
14 PASSE®: 4/3/0 (Vice Mayor Cader-Thompson, Council Members Maguire and Torliatt
15 voting "No")
16
17
18 MOTION: Council Member Torliatt moved, seconded by Maguire to continue with the
19 Dyett & Bhatia contract for the completion of the General Plan.
20
21 MOTION
22 FAILED: 3/4/0 (Council Members Healy, Moynihan, O'Brien, and Mayor Thompson
2 3 voting "No")
24
25 MOTION TO A®JOUFiN
26
27
28 MOTION: Council Member Maguire moved, seconded by Moynihan to adjourn the
29 meeting.
30
31 MOTION
32 PASSED: 7/0
33
34 The meeting adjourned at 12:1.5 A.M.
35 ~
36
37 -
3 8 E. Clark Thompson, Mayor
39
40
~ 41 ATTEST:
42
43,
44
5 Beverly J. Kline, City Clerk
46
~C~~?
Vol. 35, Page 498 March 5, 2001
2
3 Clerk's (Vote: The following items were not heard and not rescheduled to any particular
4 date due to a lack of a quorum:
;_
5
6 24. Discussion of the Adobe Lumber Site as Identified by Sonoma County as a
~ Potential Site for Low and Moderate Income Housing.
8
9 PUBLIC HEARING
10
11 25. California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS):
12
13 A. Resolution of Intention to Approve an Amendment to the Contract
14 Between the Board of Administration, California. Public Employees'
15 Retirement System (PERS) and the City of Petaluma to Provide Section
16 21362.2 (3% at 50 Full Formula) to Safety Members and Section 21023.5
17 (Public Service Credit for Peace Corps or AmeriCorps: VISTA Service) for
18 Local Miscellaneous Members and Local Safety Members. (Thomas)
19
2 0 B. Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract
21 Between the Board of Administration, California Public Employees'
22 Retirement System (PERS) and the City of Petaluma to Provide Section
23 21362.2 (3% at 50 Full Formula) to Safety Members and Section 21023.5
24 (Public Service Credit for Peace Corps or AmeriCorps: VISTA Service) for
25 Local Miscellaneous Members and Local Safety Members. (Thomas)
26
2 ~ 26. Resolution Approving a New Fee Schedule for Permit Inspections Conducted by
28 the Fire Marshal's Office. (Ginn)
29
30 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AGENDA
31
32 28. Approval of Proposed Agenda for Council's Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001.
33
34
35
1
r~