Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 6A 10/05/2009_, - ~ . CITY OF PETALUIGIA, CALIFORNIA PETALUlVIA CONIIVIU'NI'1cI' DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ®ct®lber 5, 200' AGENDA. ~ ALL Agenda Title Discussion And Possible Action by PCDC: 1) Accepting Meeting Date: October 5, 2009 the Mid-Term Review Qf. The Five Year Implementation Plan and Approviri~.Add'eridurn ,and; (2) Determining The Necessity Of Expending Meeting Time: 7:00 P1VI Funds For The Planrimg And..Administration Of Projects And Programs - - Wlii'ch Facilitate The P-rodizction, Improvement Or Preservation Of Low/1VIod Housing For FY 2008 And FY 2009.. I Discussion and Possible Joint Action by the City Council and PCDC: (3) A Joint Resolution of the City Council of Petaluma and the Petaluma Community Development Commission Adopting Findings Pursuant to California. Health acid Safety Code Section 3.3445 and Consenting to the Use of Petaluma Community Development Commission (PCDC) Tax Increment Funds,for- Public Improvements within the 1Vlerged Project Area.; and (4) A Joint Resolution of the 'City Council of Petaluma and the Petaluma Community Development Coiiiinisson Adopting Findings Pursuant to California°Community Redevelopment Law Section 33334:2(g) for the Use of Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Outside the Merged Project Area. Category: ^ Presentation ^ Appointments ^ Consent ®Public Hearing ^ Unfinished Business ^ New Business Department: I9rector: Contact Person: Phone Number: Executive Director's John Brown John Brown/Bonne 778-4345/7784484 Office Gaebler Total Cost of.:Proposal or Froiect Name of Fund: PCDC Account Numbers: (1)1VId-term Review Projects Expenditure: $42.9 million (1) 5300, 5400, 5110 (2).Pulilic Improvements Expenditure:$14rnllion (2) 5300 (Included in $42'.9 milt) (3)Planning/Admin Experidture:$34:0;000 (3) 5110 (4) Outside Project Area Expenditure: 0 (4) N/A . Amount B.ud~eted: Current Fund Balance: (1) $'4'2.9 million (1) sand (2) $23:4 million . (2) $`i4 million (3) $340,000 (3) $500,000 (4') 0 (4) N/A Recommendatton: Its recommended that PCDC takethe following action: Adopt.Resolutions #s 1 and 2 as :described. above; arid:ht is recommended that Commission and City Council. take thee. following joint action: Adopt Resolutions #s 3- and 4 as described above. 1; ^ First:readng of Ordinance approved unanimously, or with unanimous vote to allow posting prior to second reading 2: ^ First reading of Ordinance approved without unanimous vote: Ordinance has been published/postedpnor to second reading; see Attachment 3. ^ Other action requiring special notice: Notice has beengiven, see Attachment 1 Summary Statement: Regarding Resolution. #L: (;1) Califorimia Community Redevelopment: Law (CRL) Iaw'requires that each agency adopt afive-year Implementation Plan '(Plan); which provides. documentation on the link between the elimination of blight':and the proposed actions of the redevelopment. agency. The CRL required. each redevelopment agency to .adopt, after a pullrc: hearing, an Implementation Plan on or before December 1994, with a revision every fine years thereafter: Ad'difonally; a'publ'c hearing on the Plan is required mid-way through the term of the: Plan. In accordance. with Seefion 33490 of the CRL, the Petaluma Community Development Commission (PCDC) adopted the current. Five-Year.Implementation plan for the Central BusmessDistrict Project Area (CBD), the Petaluma. Community De~elopmenf Project Area (PCD) and the Low-Mod Housing Fund in June 2007. The attached Addendum to the Implementation Plan presents a summary of :redevelopment activity since .2007; updated PCDC goals; related budget changes; and a discussion of potential major issues facing the PCDC between now and the end of the term of~the current Plan. Regarding Resolutions # 2, 3, and 4!: The CRL requires adoption of these: resolutions. They require either PCDC or joint. City Council/PCDC action. A brief explanation ofeach is included under "Discussion of Resolutions" on page 4 of the staff report. Attachments to Agenda Packet Item: 1.: PCDC Resolution Approving the Addendum to Implementation.Plan 2. PCD.C'resolutonApproying Expenditures for Planning, and Administration 3. ~ Jomt City/PCDC Resolution Approving Expenditures for Public Improvements 4. Joint City/PCDC Resolution Approving Expenditures Outside Project Area Reviewed b Finance Director: 1Zevewed_by City Attorney: A rove b - ,' -. ana er: > ~ f; --, e: ~ . Date: Date: ~~~ . Rev:.#1 . , Date,Last•Revised: 9/24'/09 File:Im lemen_tation lan a ends bi1I2009-current r . _ ~ 2 CITY ©F PETALUIGIA~ CALIFORNIA PE'>['AL><T1VIA C®MMUNITI' D>EVEI;®P1VI.EN'I' C.OIVIlVIISSI®N OCTOBER 5,`2009 AGENDA I~+ PORT FOR. Discussion And Possible Action by PCDC: 1) :Accepting The Mid-Term Review Of and Approving the Addendum to the current Five. Year Implementation Plan; and. (2) Determining The Necessity Of Expending Funds For The Planning-And Administration Of Projects And Programs Which Facilitate The Production, Improvement, Or Preservation Of Low/Mod Housing For FY 2008 And FY 2009; Discussion and Possible .Point Action by the City Council and PCDC: (3) A Joint Resolution of the City Council of Petaluma and the Petaluma Community Development Commission Adopting Findings Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33445 and Consenting to the Use of Petaluma Community Development Commission (PCDC) Tax Increment Funds for Public Improvements within the Merged Project; and (4) A Joint Resolution of the City Council of Petaluma and the Petaluma .Community Development Commission Adopting Findings Pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law Section 33334.2(g) for-the Use of Low and Moderate Income .Housing Funds Outside the Merged Project Area. 1. RECOMMENnATioN: Accept the attached 2009 Mid Term Review (Addendum to the 2007-2012 Implementation Plan), and adopt Resolutions 1-4 as listed above. 2. BACKGROUND: The PCDC was activated on December 1, 1975 by the City of Petaluma Ordinance No. 1201 N.C.S: The PCDC exercises all authorized. governmental function in carrying out projects and has the authority to acquire, ad ~inister, develop, lease or sell property. This includes the right of eminent domain; the right to issue bonds, notes and other evidences of indebtedness; and the authority expend their proceeds. Under the provisions of the ordinance,, all powers of the PCDC are vested in its seven members, who are the members of the City Council: The Mayor serves as the Chair; the Vice-mayor as Vice Chair, and the City Manager as the Executive Director. The PCDC administers programs and projects in three funds: ® Central Business .District. Project Area Fund ® Petaluma.Community DevelopmentProject Area Fund ® Low and 1Vloderate .Income Housing Fund The California; Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq. (CRL) law requires that; the, PCDC set=aside in a segregated Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (Housing: Fund) twenty percent (20%) of all tax increment revenue generated from. its project areas for the purpose of'increasng; improving and preserving the commun"ty's supply of low and moderate income housing: Both project areas .deposit 20% of their tax increment revenue to the Housing Fund. According to CRL Section 3~3'490(a), the Implementation Plan (Plan) must describe specific goals and objectives for" the project areas, the specific programs, including potential projects to be carried out in _, theprojeet areas; the estimated expenditures to be made during the period covered by the plan and an explanation of how the goals; objectives; programs, and expenditures will assist in the alleviation of bli`glt. The Plan must also describe how the agency will. implement its obligations to replace, increase, improve, preserve and maintain low and moderate income housing. 3 ._ The attached Mid Term Review outlines the modified pnorities for the last half of the Plan's term and presents financial data on the status° of the proposed .expenditures. 3. I)ISCUSSION~OF RESOLUTIONS # 1-4: (PCDC I2ESO1,uT1oN #1) The PCDC' defined a series of goals and objectives as part of the 2007-201.2 Implementato_n.Plan•and budgeted~funds accordingly. Table 2, on pages 1~0 and 11, shows the status of all projects "completed, ongoing, :in progress, or not started." PCDC goals and related budgets were modified during. the discu"ssions with Seifel Consulting which took place as part of the drafting- of the Mid Term Review. The follo_ wing chart represents the numerical and percentage changes by non- housing budget category: Or%ginal Plan (FY 2006/07-FY2011/12) Circulation, Landscaping Public Fac. and Infrastructure Economic Development Building Rehabilitation Site Prep and Development Other $27,440,298 (44%) 4,358,912 (7%) $14,277,667 (22%) -$ .1.,275,126 (2°/a) 16;203,596 (25%) 142,882 (0%) $63.7 mill Mid Term Review (FY2009/ 10-FY2011 / 12) $12,980,746 (30%) ( 0%) $14,120,000 (33%) $ 255,278 (1%) $15,567,354 (36°/a) $, 25.,000 (0%) $42.9 mill Of the original $63.7 million budgeted for projects, approximately $20 million has been expended, leaving $42.9 million available to address the. PCDC's goals for the balance of the Plan period. As can be seen in the table on the ~~followng page, that assumes a best case scenario of (1) issuing bonds; (2) no State "taking" of funds; and (3) stable assessed property valuation. The Housing section of the Addendum reviews housing accomplishments to date, charts PCDC progress in meeting. its affordable housing obligations, and discusses plans for the .remainder of the implementation period. The housing goals, objectives, and programs contemplated in the Plan have not changed. (PCD:C RESOL.U,TION #2) .Section 33334.3 (d) of the CRL requires an annual written determination stating- that planning and administration expenses paid from the Housing. Fund are necessary for the production, improvement, or- preservation of low and moderate income housing. (JOINT RES'OL><1TION #3), Section 33445(a) of the CRL' requires-that certain findings be made prior to: a redevelopment agency's expenditure of tax .increment funds for public improvements. These .findings must show that (a) the. improvements will be of benefit to the Project Area or the immediate neighborhood in which the~proj:ect is located; (b) no other reasonable method of financing is available to the cominumty;:; (c) the improvements will assist in the elimination of blight inside .the Project Area or the provision o'f affordable housing, and (d) the assistance is consistent with the current Implementation Plan. The legislative. body-must. also consent to such use of'tax increment. 4 (J®INT' RESOLUTION #4) Section 33334.2 (g). authorizes the PCDC to use monies from the Housing Fund outside a redevelopment proj ecf 'area .only upon'adopton of resolutions by PCDC and the City Council finding,~thatsuch use will be~ofbenefit to~~the~proj~ect areas. 4. FINANCIAL IMPACTS The following table is a snapshot, showing fund estimates. PCDC funds will be impacted by the State budget and Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (SERAF), changes in assessed valuation, and PCDC bonding capacity. (See pages 12 and 1.3 of "the Addendum for a complete explanation). With Bonding/No SERAF W/O Bonding/W SERAF Balance in the Fund as of 6/30/2009 $23,400,000 $23,400,000 Uncommitted Tax .Increment Funds (approx. $2,500,000 annually) $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 Potential Bonding (2011-2012). $12;000,000 0.00 Funds available for Potential Projects and Programs $42,900,000 $30,900,000 Potential SERAF (2009-20..10)_ (5;074,284) Potential SERAF (2010-2011 estimate) ~ 1,014,800) Funds Available $42,900,000 $24,810,916 Projects and Programs recommended through 2012: Circulation; Landscaping,&Parking (12,980,746) (12,980,746) Public Facilities & Infrastructure Economic Development (14,..120,000) (14,120,000) Building Rehabilitati:orr ( 25`5;278) ( 255,278) Site Preparation & Development (15,567,364) (15,5.67,354) Other ( 25..,000). ( 25.,000) TotaLof Projects and Programs (42,948,378) (42,94'8,378) Other Potential Projects. throe hg 2012 Public Facilities and Infra"structure: (10,000,000_(10,000,000) .Relocation of Fire Station (if $S1VI Fed. funds committed) Net Income to'Cost of Potential Projects & Programs (10,048,378) (28,137,462) 5 ATTACHMENT # 1 PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO1VIlVIISSION RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE ~MIIJ-TERM REVIEW OF -THE PCDC 2007-2012->F'IVE`YEAR IIVIPLEMENTATION PLAN AND APPROVING AN ADDENDUM THERETO WHEREAS, the Petaluma Community Development Commission (PCDC), a public body, corporate and pol"tic, was activated on December 1, 1975 by the City of Petaluma Ordinance No. 121 N.C.S. and is a redevelopment agency duly organized purauant to Community Redevelopment. Law, California Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq. (CRL);~ and WHEREAS, the PCDC administers two redevelopment project areas"within the City of Petaluma: ® The Central. Business District Project Area; and ® The Petaluma Community.D.evelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the CRL requires that each redevelopment agency adopt and update every five years an Implementation Plan, -which provides documentation for the link between the elimination of blight and the proposed actions of the redevelopment agency;, .and WHEREAS, the .PCDC last adopted afive=year plan for the two proj ect areas and the Low-Moderate Income Housing Fund in June 2007; and WHEREAS, the CRL also requires that every redevelopment agency, at .least once within the five-year term of the Implementation Plan, conduct a public hearing and hear testimony of ah interested parties _for the purpose of reviewing the redevelopment plan and the corresponding implementation plan for each redevelopment project area within the jurisdiction and evaluating:-progress of the redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, on October 5', 20.09,, the PCDC held a duly noticed public hearing to review the 2007-2012 Five Year Implementation Plan; and. WHEREAS, PCDC staff has prepared. and presented to the PCDC an Addendum to Five Year Implementation Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED that the Petaluma Community Development Commission hereby accepts the Mid=Terrri review of the PCDC 2007-2012 Five Year Implementation Plan and approves the Addendum thereto, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 6 I: introduction and Backgrou~n~d' Th'e purpose. of the IVlidtenn+,Revew of the 2007 Five-Year Implementation Plan (Implementation ~Plan);,is to provide.'a review°of the current status:of the goals;,prog"r_ams, and,projects, and estii-ated expenditures<seY forth in the :Implementation Plan and update it accordingly. Iri accordance wi'th'th"e California Community Rede"velopinent Law~(.CRLj, the Petaluma Community:Development Commission (PCDC) adopted thee:200T..Five-Year:Implementation Plan oni June 18, 2007 The purpose of the Implementation Plan was to'set;foi•th the specific goals; programs, projects, and estimated expenditures for the:ProjectsAreas administered by PGDG foi• the five-yeai••period from FY 2007/08'through EY 2011/12. T7ie 1VlidtenYni Review'provides an opportunity to; evaluatePCDC°s progress towards its. Implementation Plan;goals; The CRL requires that,a,pulilicrheai-irig on the;pr.ogress of the Implementation Flan! take-place no-zarlizr than two;:years and nolater than three years after adoption of the Implementation.Plan. Tlus Addendum contains tlie;key findings of'the 1Viidten-m Rzview and revisions to'tlie 2007 Implementation Plan. A. Summary of rMajor Findings and .Changes to~the Five=Year Implementation Plan Over the past year; the:Pealuma CityCouncil, in its capacity as the PCDC Board, has undertaken. an,;evaluatori:of redevelopment projects and act"vities. This~evaluation'is described ~in more detail in Section:II below: The PCD.C.B'oard-has determined to shift some resources among specific projects~to~more str'afegically utilize-,PCDC funding. Table 1 summarizesaciual resources spent to date and projected expenditures by~redevelopmentprogram cafegory. B. Organization This Addendum contanns~twormajor sections..The first section focuses~on redevelopment activities not related to housirig,(Non=Housing,Program). Tle~second'suminanizes PCDC?s affordable housnng:activities "(Housing~Program); discussing~housing,accomplishmerits,_charting PCDC progress immeeting its affordable dousing obligation§',, and plariniing for the. remainder of the Implementation Plan period.. Petalu"ina Communiiy-Development Commission I_t Seifel Consulting Inc. Implementation PIanMidterm~Review $eptember2009 Table 1 Summary ofActual and Projected Five-Year Redevelopment Program Expenditures, FY 2006107 - FY 2011112 Petaluma Community Development"Commission Ex enditures . Pro rams and'Pro'eels Actual Expenditureg; FY 2006/07 to FY 2008%O9° projected Expenditures, b'Y2009/l0.to FY 2011/1=2: Total Actu al'' and Projected Expenditures, FY2006/07 to FY 2011/12 Circulation Landsca°'in .and Parl:inaIiii rovements $14460'000 $'. 12,981 000 $ ;27 440'000 Public Facilities and Infrastiu'cture t$4 339;000 ~ $ $ 4' 359 000 Economic Develo ittent $158 000 ''$ 1'4-120.000 ~$ 1'4'278'000 Buildin 'Reliabilifation $1.020;000 $~ 255 000 $ 1 275"000 Site Pr aiation and Develo `menf $636 000 $. 15 367 000 '$ 16.204'000; Other ._ $118'000 : $_ _ 25 000.. $ .143'000' TotafNon=Hotisin ' $20750:000 ~$ 42 948 000. $ 63 698000. Affordable IIousin Pro dam $7 19I 482 N/A N,~A Total"Redevelo ment;Pro ram- $27;941,482 D'/R N/A No[e; Projected expegditutzs rounded fo the nearest thousand. a', Tomaintaih,consistency withaha-2007 Imp1eiiientattbn.:Plan, actuaPezpendituies•include FY'2006/07, which ts~notpart df the 5ve-y"ear Implementation Plan peiiod. b. Changes4o4fie 2007 Implementation Plan dolnotiaclude revisions to the Agenc}''s Affordal]e Housing Program. Source; Peialuma Commugity Development Commission. Pitahima Community DevelopmentCommission Seite! Consulting Inc: Implementation Plan Midterm Review September 2009 16orti-Housing Program Section.II of'the Ad''dendum includes a summary of non=housing•program°accomplishments, plans for therremainder ~fthe Implementation Plarrperiod, anda reviewRof'revenues _and expenditures. A. Accomplishments PCDC has undertaken many;non-liou$ing projects arid~activifies.in.tle,Project Areas over the initial two=years ofthe~2007 Implementation Plan ,period and has major projects in focus for the remaining three;y:ears',Projects completed by PCDC'in'the'first two:years of the`Implementation Plan period include; but~are~not limited to: • Draftingdesigris for~pedesfrian,improvements along `th`e Petaluma River; Completing traffic and,'circulation'improvements.~along Caulfield Extension, Petaluma Boulevard, Ely Street, Washington Street andKainier Avenue; • Finishing.Phase -1 of the Water Street Turn Basin_improv.ements • LJndergroundirig utilities in the Theater District; arid. • Funding the-.Fire Sprinkler Studv and-Program. Please'refer to Table 2 for a full list of project completed-as:of~tte'end of FY 2008/09. PCDC has begin and will continue to undertake projects and activihes;in;the,°1Vlerged".Project .areas. to alleviate blighting cgndtions and-achieve the!,goals set°forth in the"Redevelopment Program. B, Plans fo'r~the:Remainder ofthe Fite-Year Implementation'-Plan Period Iri Fall; 20.08, .the;PCDC,Boartl began a strategic assessment;Qf PCDC actions to establish. prioities thafwill best encourager-the revitalization of the,redevelopmenfprojectr,areas and'fiscal health.. Based onBoa'rd di'recti'ori,,PGDCand Seifel stiff: Reviewed recent.PCDGaccomplishments; projects; revenues'and expenditures, Discussed and:recoinmerided,PCDC goals an~.priorities„ Compared the existing-budget:(per t1e.FY 2007/08-2011/12 Implementation Plan) to goals; • Reviewed criteria: for strategically evaluating.potential projects; Estimated anticipated,resaurces for he remainder;of the ImplementafionPlan period, as shown~:in~Table 3'; and: Provided detailed.funding,recommendations, as°sfiowri•:iri Table 2. Adapting this Midterin:Reuew.will officially amend the 2009 Implementation:P1'anto. m`c"o"rporate, the ieuised funding priorities contained in'Table 2. These revisions reflecttlie; recogution'that the, mare>PCDC invests wisely now in tax`ncrement-generating projects; .the ,more,resources it`will ~have4in?the long run. Significant~resoiirces have thus; been allocated for.. devel'oprrierit/redevelopment assistance and opportunity site•developmerit..City and PCDG goals, ,economic reyitalization.criteria, the opportunity fo:participate'in strategic,public private partnerships, andahe Economic Development Strategy (anticipated i'n, 201'0)-will guide tle: use°of these~funds. - Petaluma,'CommunityDevdopmerit Commission II-3 Seifel Consulting Inc. Implementation Plan'Midlerm Review September`2009 10 Tatile;2 Revi'sed,,Five-Year Non-Housing Redevelopment.Program Expenditures,. FY;2001i107 - FY 2011'112 Betaluma Community j)evelopment Commission Project'Title Project Number' ! Project 'Status Actual Expenditures,. FY 2006107'tor FY:2~OOi1109 Projected Expenditures, FY 2009110 f° FY 2011112 Total Actual and Projected Experidifures, FY2006107 to Fl'=2011}17 4 -'~ p 1~ ~.~, i~.L ,~1~, PCDC CIP:Sal /Benefit" 0200001 Com Meted' P a 394,458 $ - $ 394,458 Caulfield Eii[ensioit and Railroad'Cros§ing 01200104 Completed' $ 1,506;000 $' -, $ 1;506;000 Noith Water Steet C20Q1.05 Completed $ 30,020 $ - $ '30;020 Petaluma Boulevard-Bike,Lanes - 020010$( Completed $ 47,595 $`' - $ 4.7;595 Petaluma Boulevard Street Improgemgnts 0200304, In,Progress $ 1,3;17;000 $ 6,000 $ 1:323,000< KellenWestern"Avenue,toB.'$treet,R'@construction~ 0200308 Completed. $ 90;000; $ - $ 90,000' Water StreeU'I~rn'Basin Improvments;,-"Phase'1 0200403 Completed ~ 762,000 $ - $ 762;000. River Trail Desio ,for Top of,Baiik' 0200503 0ompleted i$ 1;950,000. $ - $ 1-,950;000 D Street Bridge Repl_a_cement of Taiiuuon Bearings'(for; livid e rotation ~ 0201204 Completed ;$ 292,000 $ - $ 292;000, Ely/Caulfield/Payian Stree[ Reconstruction 0500206. Completed , $ 2;682,00 $ - $ 2;682;000 WashingtoirStreet/6[h;StreeG' 0500207 Completed $ 987,000 $ - $ 987,000 Rainier'Avenue,.Ctoss-TownCoririectorandInteichange 0501204 Completed $ 3,000;000 $ - $ 3,000;000' O1dRe~iwood,Hghway..lnterchange.v/idening 0501304' InPiggress $ 1,000;OpO'' $ 9;OOq;000' $ 10,000;000 Assessments P20101'0 Ongoing $ 170,254. $ 1'04;746 S 275;000' Landscape~Improvements_ P201040 Completed $ ? 266, $' - $, 2;266 Traffic Signal Upgrades P201150 Completed '~ 98,959. $ - $ 98,959 E.•Washington,Street'Inte;change Improvements P2011b0 In'Ptogress ',$ •130,000. $ 3,870;000 . $ .4,000;000 Subtotal, ; $ -14,459;592 e' 1?;980,746 ''$ 2't~40,298 1sU2nd"Street Warehouse 0400207 I Completed $ 553 a: - $ SSs DowntownImproyementsPtiae;II 0200603' Completed $ 109,500 a - $ 199;500 CPSP Theater)DistrictlD; Street Uride round ?g 0200703 Completed $ '3,615,859: $. - $ 3,615;859. :PoliceHeadquarteis'RenovationslReloca[ion C300I06 ~ Ongoing $ 39,000. $ - $ 39,000. Relocation,ofFite Stafioii 1 C3Q0305 Ongoing,. $ 594';000 $ - $. 594;000 Subtotal' ! t$; 4;J58,91-' .$ -• $ ~L358,912, ;~ Lowri[own ssociation, P201020 ~ i On oin g .g $ 1°-:,f~: g. 1.4i; ~ ~ ., 277,667 Developmen't7Redevelopmem r+asistarice` N/A Not;Started $; - $ 14;OOQOQO $ 14;000;000. Subtotal: $ 157;667 $ 1'4';120,000 '$ 14,277,669 Petaluma Community.DevelopmentCommission :Implementation Plan°MiiJte`rm Reviyw Seifel Consulting Inc. Septemtier40O9 11 Project Title Project. Number' Project ,Status+ Actual Expenditures, FY'2006I07 to: FY 2008!09 Projected Expenditures, FY 2099f10~to. FY2011H2 Tofal Actual. and Projected Expenditures, FY 200fif07 to F.Y`2011I12 .r rorefiorrIinpmycmer~ I oanPra_i.:n~ P201~0`ll '~~~n~ldeted $ a~9,920'~ $'- - $ 459.'20' Commwnty,Eacilities;;Miscellanec+r Projects . Cl'00108. _ Completed :$ ` 0,000 $ ' $ 50,000 Petaluma Railroad Depot~Renovation C200303 in=Progress ~ 353,000 $` 40;260: $ 393,260 URIvI'Seismic Retrofit:J?rograin P.201070. In Progress '$ 39,224. $ I10776' $ 1'50;000. Railroad Depot Lease' P201'l10 Ongoing $ 95;758. $' .104,242: $ 200;000 Fire'Sprittkler Study,&,Prograrii' P201190 Coinplete'd $ 21' Q46' $ - $ 21,946 Subtotal- $ ];019,ti4R` $ 255,2~R'- $, ,1.27126• ~, r• x" Brownfields-EPA Assessmen['Project. P201'140 ImProg;ess $" X6;242 $ 163,758' $ 400;000 Dredgittg'Pe[alumaRiver',(Feb..200Z) F93306 Completed $ 400,000 $ - $ 400;000 Au[oCenterDriye,Exterisi;oii C531-01002 NotS[arted. $ - $ 1,346`000 $ 1,346;000 Opporturnty SiteDevelopment N/A Not Staited. $;: -- $ 14,057;596. $ 14;057;596 Subtotal= e. 6361242• ,$ `-15569,35Q $ 16;203;596 c ;'•r T'leii Software N/A Completed $ 56;000' $ - $ :56;000 ADASeIfEvaluationand`.Trattsttro~i.Plan N/P. Not.$tarted $ - $ 25;000 $ .25,000 General Plan M002020 ; -Completed '~$ 5,1,983. $ - $ 5.1,983'. TtafficEngineeungServices, P201180 ; Completed S 9,899 $ - $, 9,899: Subtotal Q, .11^'R82 $= 25,000- $ 1x2;882 a. ProjecCnunitiers,starting with C,indicate~a-capital;improvement; defined as the cosCOF^,uchasing -r.constructing improvements. Includes design, projectadiiiinisttation, tight of way~acgmsitiofr; environmental and:physical-mitigations and'~unprovements. Project numbersatarting with P iridicale aprogratn; defirieil as`a group ,bf iElated activities perfortne'd by brie•or more otgatrizatiorial writs forihe putpose of accomplishing a City responsibility. b. liulude d in prof a ct c osts: r: Development/Red'evelopment?activrtres include .but:are not luriited'ta 1. Attract new business and retain:existitig businesses: 2., Providebusine'ss and developer incentives. Provide opportunities for;pariicipatioh by owneis'and'teriants:in the revitalization of their properties: 3. Enhance accessibility [o employnrent;;retail and entertainment oppor[unities. 4. Ifnece'ssary, provide assrsfaiice to the'private sec[orto`ens,ire'development. d, See also "Ciiculation;rLandscaping arrd Parking Irnproyements" and "Public Facilities and Inftastrue[ure" piojects,ttial catalyie?pnvale":iiivestrnent. Source `Petaluma Community Development.Comm_ issiotr, City of Petaluma FY 2007/08`Budget Cny of Petaluma Public`Works;Depanment;. City of Petaluma Finance Depaitrnent; Seifel.Consulting Inc. Petaluma Commun ity,tlevelopment-.Commission Irriplemenfaton Plan Midterm RiSvieGi' Seifel Consulting Inc. Septemtie~2009 12 Estitnatad resources available to 1'CI7C are summarized in Table'3. Table 3 Resources Available, FY~200911'0 -:FY 201`1'!12 Petaluma.Community Development Gornrni'ssion' Total F,und'l3~ilancc;(lst a5 ~1'(~'3O,!(39)* ,$ ?3,=4~)s,0O0 Friiid :5100" ~+ 23;~7b,t)t)d Other Ftuii(s _. S (30,UOU) lldd'iti}nal. as ;._ ts- ou-~.;o rcvrnuo-~"* ~ ;S 7;S00,t)O0 Addit'[onttl IiitScin~l~a~acit ._ __ _ _ ~__ t2:OQC1,00~: I,stinalcd I~inclr.A~~ailaltlr'(f~l' 21)09/lil It-,Fti' 2(1.11/1,Z) `~ .42,~)~8,(ll)0 *Nci2l~)Ou/09. f.'sRA(::Slifr~ mad'c: *'~~~:a iirrtliorr:innu.ally? in t<i~ iitcr~~riicnf lir nut-trou5iirt projects tiuiing'(.)O~),•'1p-?011;12, ~til~er dr~bt ooh;aiii~iSS, pass. hrou~;h p,~ynl~nts.~ind r1f;i`uCy adminisu•.ition. ill li~rrres~roundeci td_thc ciearesr 1.060; 5oui-cr: t'~taliiiiia C;oiimunity, Devclonin~nt C'iiiinncsion; Seitcl C:'iicisulting Gcc These funding;estimateswill~,be impacted by thefollowing-factors: The State,bidgetandaupiileinental Educational 12evenue'.Au~mentation Fund-(SERAI') payments'. The State budgetipassed~in July-2009'approprates $2.05`billon'in red'evelopmentfurids statewide, including:roughly $5 million'frorri PCDC iir'FY 2009/TO and.$1 million in FY 2010%11. Thi's appropriation will be challenged: in Court. If It is upheld, PCDC will Have to make the FY 2009/10 payrnent`by Inlay 1'0, 2010. Changes iri-Assessed~Valtation.,Tax increment'reuenues•are':based on changes in assessed val'uation.. According to the Sonoma County Auditor=Controller, FY 2009/10 assessed values•appearcto have increased slightly ahove_preyious year values. Given the current economic •downturn.and uncertainatate of the market; assessed values may decline in'tle comng;years and reduce anticipated ;tax increment revenues:. On the ofher hand, °assessed,"value will increase as new development projects are completed. Current projecttoris conservatively estimate, rio new development over the remaindei•:of the .five- year Implementation Plan period, Projects Shat go~forward would increase tax increment revenues, potenttally counteracting negativereassessmenfs and raising overall revenues. • PCDC bonding capacity:.Estimated.funds to be.raised.toward the~end ofthe•five-year Implementation Plan period include $12 million`iit.bond proceedsa' Given projected revenues and debtservice~levels, PCDC appearsao have:the.capacity to raise these funds: However, t1ieCaliforiuahudget, SERAF fakes, and pofentialfor Assessed Value fluctuations have introduced uncertainty.regarding futurz revenues arrd, therefore, the ~ P'orid proceeds eatimafed'based on tax increment available for non-Housing projects and activitiesm 20,11 1 ~; h percent iifere§t; a 30;yearaerm, and a 1..25' debt coverage ratio. s. ~,,, ~ __..._ .,, „ , ,.. ,,,,, P,etaLuma,Corrimuniry,Development Commission II-6 Seifd Consulting Inc. Implementation Plan Midterm Review September 2009 13 bonds.liacked by-.them. The taxi allocation bind marketis also in.a period of frarisiton; thwartingreliable estimates of potential proceeds. As-a result, bond. proceeds may bz lower or higher than currently projected. 'If some of he anticipated revenues are not ayailalile; PCDC will beforcedao cut back; on non- housing,projectsand.ac'tivities planned for the remainder oP;the Tmplemenfation.Plan period. C Conclusion PCDC' has'accomplished.many. significant non-housing projects and activities in the Projecf Areas :over the initial twoy,:ears of the Implementation Plari.period`. Many of tha.Implementation Plan ,projects and activitiesaiaxe'been accomplished or initiated.,;PCDC's. actii~ities represent an intentional strategy"fo leverage I'CDC's investment in the':commiiriity, thatwill,.in--'turn, increase future tax incremenf:nevenues for.upcoming~revitalizatiori;projects: Each:ofthe projects and programs are meant'to~position PCDC. to alleviate blght:=and realize 'mariy;of the'City's General Plan; Capital Improuement;l'rogram, and.Specific;Plans goals and-objectives. During the final ahree years 'of the;Iinplementation Plan period, PCDC will continue,to work towards the completion of projects and.plan,fgr the future. 91i. Housan`g Program. ,. This section of the,Addendum.revews,housing accomplshments~to date, charts PCDC progress in meeting'its affordaUle'housing obligations, and discusses plans:for the=remainder of tlie'five- year Implementatioi- Plan~period. A. Accom`pJishmenfs Over the initial two years ofthe Implementation Plan period;;:PCDC'has nndertaken,many housing projects aril actwities focnszd on~the provison:ofaffordalile housing. Housing protects completed.by PCllC in the firsttwo:years of the Implementation:Plangeriod include; .. • Assisting with the~relialiilitatiori gf 33 very aow and 401'ow income reiifal units at Corona Ranch Apartments; • Providing fnancing fortlie construction of43 very low`'and 141ow'iricome rental senior units arthe Casa Grande Senior,Apartments project; 'and • Committing Housing-'funds for"the construetiori;and rehabilitation.ofrer-tal housing throughout the 1~Ierged' Project Areas. B' Plans for~'th'e Remainder°of theFive-Year Imp'lem'entation Plan; Period Tlie~housing,component,of the 2007:Implementatiori Plan`sets forth specific€goals?arid objectives for;the Five=Year~Implementation Plan.period (FYf2007/08'through FY.20T1/12); presents estimates.Hof'specificHousirig~Fund:deposits, projects and a"'xpenditures~plarined for'tlie Petaluma"Community Development Commission III-.7 Implementation Plan Midterm,~Review Seif~ Consulting tnc. September 2009 14 Implemeritati`on'Plam,period; explains how the stated goals; :objectives, deposit"s_,. programs, projzcts-:and;,expenditures will produce:al~ordable:housing,tznits to meet tlesz obligations; and projects.hoising production,over the life of the Plari. •The goals; objectives, and;programs' contemplated in the 200:7 Irnplemeritation Plan have not changed. For the purposes.of this Ivlidterm'Revi'ew ofthe status and,progress of PCDC's dousing obligations; the following components have been reviewed: ° Housing:Fund`Revenues, Expenditures, and Targetmg;-;Redevelopment agencies are required. to deposit tax incremerit'nto.fhe Housing Fund and expendtax increment revenuz for the' provision of affordableaiousing. ° Housing-Production.Plan.- iVliriimum percentages of'new or substantially rehabilitated housing units in:;a projecYarea_are•to be made available, of an affordalile housing; cost:. ° Replacement~Housing~Plan -Agencies must replace housing units removed from the~housing stock;as aresult of redevelopment:.activities. In addition, if a project:area~is iwithin three years of reaching fhe ime: imit of plan effectiveness; ~PbDC'must address CRL.reguirements'inahe IVlidtenn Review, in:regards to PCDC's ability .to ..comply with'its iousing obligation::Theserequirements~are:not applicable to PCDC atthis time, as neither Project Area;will reach i'ts Time limit for plan effectiveness within three years. Housing Fund Revenues, Expenditures and Targeting The GRL.requires PGDG to seT aside in a separate, segregated Low and Moderate-Income Housing Fund (HousngFund) at-least 20 percent of;all tax'increment revenue. generated from its Project Areas for'ahe. purpo e ofincreasing, improving and preserving the community~s supply of low and.moderate-incorne housing: Under the CRL, Housing Furid moneys. must be argeted to: specific income levels according.xo. need;and fn non-age restncted,housing.'The targeting obligaCions`musi be met over the period between January 1; 2002;,and~the compliance period ending in 2014:'Income level and non-age restricted expenditure.requirementss_et forth in the_2007 Implementation Plan~remain unchanged as oftlus year. Pleasesee:~the•2007Imp1ementationPlan•foriadiscussion;ofthese:requirements. As presented,below;:PCDC-expenditures continue to exceed these'reguirements. Targeting to, IncomeLevel Table 4 summarizesthe'percentage of:HousingFnnd.moneys•s~enYon~each°of the targeted income. levels; as: def ried by. the CRL., PCDC expenditures are mo"re'than adequate. fo satisfy the requirements of AB' 637. P,CDCanticipates•meeting its income targeting requirements. based on its fair share of "regional liousmg needs, as-determined by ABAG:iii the proportions-.described in 'Table III-7 of the 2007Implementation Plan; for the :'ten-year compliance period ending iri 2014: Petaluma CommunilypeVelopment~Commission III_g Seifel'Consultinglnc. Implementation Flan MidEerm Review 'September2009 1$ 'Tattle 4 Housing Fund Expendiftires Targefing~by!Ircome; 111'l2002~5130/3009 Petaluma,Commtanity Development Commission . Pcrcnl`6f ~~pc»diturc "Cgtai, }'ercental;e ;Need by lttacomefit-pu _ _ a>!s tc-tdihuxs " Tx ~endift~t~cs.. Tnc'amc_Levcln VU}'.~~-1)4V 5~~,7O7,t1(10 ft~Gir /~t least =1•~~%ti t,civ ~a,5=1?.,t)Oa 32~%>. f1t least 24!',i, Moderate. tiU (?`,i~ Nu titan them 3(1`:4, "t'iitaf $i~,2.1!I,UUI)_ lUfi'%; 10U'% a, t~xp4ndittii`cs to dare hzsecl.oit data availahle firnn the i'etaluriia I Irntsiig UcrarYnierlt. 1>, t3asccl i)it A13A(_i at~~~it,nal 11~xn,n~,Nr~dsrllloratic),t , 19y~);30f1f:. ~Stitu-cr: Asbctatii)ti c5i' 16 t~ •r~rca C,gvernntcnts, 9'etal'iinia Cunuiiiaiiity l7i:veltiliiitent C'x)ttitnissibn. Targeting to Non-iAge,Resf~ictiad Mousing In;additionao the requii~emetit:outlined above, as of'January 1, 2002, a~defined minimum percentage of Housing Fund moneys'must•be spenton.housing-availalile toall persons regardless of age. In 2005,;the Sfate;Legislature amended the method of:deferininmg'tle mitumuin °percentage of Housing Fund.money,s~fo be spent on non-age `restri'cted housing. This minimum is equal. to the percentage of,;Petaluma's low-income households with a.inetriber under age 65,; as reported in the rnost;recent,i7.S. Census. As-shown'in Table.IU-6 of thei2007Implementaton `Plan, the 2000 Census indicate .'that 56 percenf of the City's.,'low=income households hav.,e a householderunder 65'years±rf;age: Thus; PCDG must;expend af.minimum 56 percent of its funds on housing that does not impose age restrictions on resident's: PC17G has 'experided:a;total of approximately X7.3 million on non-age restricted housing and $6.9 milliomon age restricted housing,since January 1, 2002,, as shown in Table 3: While;Housing Fund expenditures on'non-age restricted housing do. not meet the;~target~percentages, PGDC plans to meet therequired,expenditui•e amounts for the current compliance°period ending in 201'4. tea, H,A..~.. ~,~..~., .,~n ~ ____A, ~.h.... ~ ,,.,,,w. , , , `Retaltima~Community Deve~opmerit'Commission III-9 Seifd Corisiilting Inc. Implementation^Plan Mdterm,Review September2009 16 Table 5 Housing. Fund Expenditures• Tai-geting~6y Income, 1'11'l2002~l3012009 Petaluma Community Development. Commission Percent of Total A =e'Tar~~etin" x 'Cx endittn•es° E~x icntlittires 'C'ar yet Percents xe Nan-A;~~ Restrictc:d_ I Initsiii~;: $7,!i37;000 j 1"io. At least S(i'i{, Age.l2esti•tirkad Flo~isin~' _ _ y;(i.912,000~ _~~)`%r~ N~~ morethaii Ohl",%5 Toni{ ~ _ ~_ $~1~,249,0011 ,1'i)0'% 1t)fl°1, a. liv}?cnclituce, tr, tl;itc::b:+~~d.cm doitti avail,rhle 1`rom fhi;~f?ctttlumo I Itiwsin~.~rl)rpartnic~G. tiinu•z~ tl:S. (;cn~us:(urcau, IJ:S. I~ejru•unent of [tousin~; and Ll~^haut Owel~,tirneiit, I'ctttlurna Cinntriiititr~ 1?c~•c1~71nntiit k:aniiiiissioit. 2. Housing Production Plan T1ie, CRL requu•es redevelopment agencizs to report; on lustoncal Housng production.and to adopt a plan for each project area showng'how PCDC intends to meetits I-lousing Production Requirement.(th'e Housing Production Plan). For this Midterm Review; P,CIDC's housing production;is reported for tlie''first'two years of the Impleme."ntation.Plan period, andfis projected for."the remaiung tlizee years:{of the Iriiplementation Plair penod..PCDC has met,.;and expects to continue to'iriget, its;:liousrrig;production obligations:. Please'see the 2007'~Implementatign Planfor amore derailed explanation:of CRL housing production requirements.. Table 6 presents the s,tatas of PCDL's affordable honsing production obligation through the first. two years of the five-year Implementation Plan period. and projections=for`the remainder of'the 10=year compliance period. P,etaLumatCommunity Deve~opmeritCommisson III-10 Implementation Plan Midterm Review Seifd` Consul ti ng. I nc. September 2009 17 Table 6 Housing Production and Affordable Housing Obligation Petaluma Community Developmenf Commi§sion _ - ,Through FY 2003/04 FY;2004/OS - FY.2008/09: FY 2009/10'- FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 - FY 2031-32 FY:2004/OS - FY'2013/14° Totalpver. I,ifeofPlans" Percent Housing:Pi•iiduction` ' New Units; 890 840 130 .354: 970 2,214• SubstantiaLRekiabilitation _ •20 _ 5 5 5 SO 35 Total 91R gq5 1~S iS9 `9R(1 2;219, CRL.11Tm•dable Housing Obligation' Ve Low 5 51 8; 22 ~`~ 133 6% Verv.Low..LoworModeiate 13' 127 20 54 '1-17 337 PS% ~tlorda6le:Housing Production`' _ Very_Low 471. 77 13'4 27 21'.1.. 7u'? Veiv i,ow,;Low or Moderate 912 ~ ] 73 ~ 201 43 374 1 32 Anordable~Yi•oduction~Surplus~(Deticitj Very Low _ 416 26 l26' S l52 574. Very Low;. Low or Moderate. 7Z6 46 181. ~ 1 '~ s227 992 a. As required byCRL, total uriits.over,ten yeancomplianceperiod (Section33490(a)(2)(B)). ti. As requited by the CRL, total units oventhe hfe of~the$edevelopmenf Pla~rs.(Section 33490(a)(2)(B)). a Total units produced m the.Prolect Areasduring the~gpecrfied'time period. d Nunbei~of affordable ~mtsregwie$bas edpn uiuL.pioduced.Affoidable housing production obhgatron'forhon Agency~developed,nousing requires l5% of total units to be-available at affordable coeC Of those units, at least 40% inns[ beaffoidable to very low income fiouseholdsl(6 % of 1}ie total ivufs): Agency developed housiughas tugher..inclusionary'requuements. The Agency has not, and'doesnotanticipate, duecUydevelopuig units. e. Ntunber of mots sansfying.CRL aflorda6le housiiig~pinductioii. otiligalion..Affo`dable wets pFoduced~outside Proled Areas counted on~a onefor two'lydsis. f. RemainingafTordable smplus~.orobligational ifie end~offhe'period. Note: I'ercentagesmaynot add exactly: due Lorounding: CRL affordablehousing producliomrequiremenis are rounded np to theuearest whole unit. Source: Petaluma~Community.Development Commission,!Seifel Consulting Inc. Petaluma Community Development Commission ~ Seifel'Consufling,lnc. Implementation Plan Midterm Review September 2009 i8 3. Replacement Housing Plan Hisfoneally;PCDC:h_a-s noY destroyed or re"moved"'any residential units; nor does they Agency" plan fo do so over tlierremainder of the`iinplemer-tationplan;period.,Howeyer, in~tlie event,that P.CDC`.were:to undertakeprojectsthat:coutdxesult in•the displacement of households iitthe next ten years, PCDGwoild 'replace;all units a"iid follow all state requi'rements'for "replacement housing and relocation. C: Conclusion ~- , PCDC has; been, working diligently towards achieving its housing„goals forthe five=year Impjementatiori Planeperi"od. Much'has been accomplished in the first two•yearssand exci ing 'projects are underway forthe remaining three years. .""" ... .~.,.,.~ ,w, . ",,.~.w ",,, .",.,"~ ..~ "" , ",. M , ........ Petaluma Community. Development Commission III-17 ,Seifel~~Consulting Inc. 'Implementation.Plan Midterm;'Review September 2009 19 ATTACHMENT #2 _. . PETALiJ1VIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NECESSITY OF EXPENDING.FUNDSFQR THE PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIONOFPRQJECTS AND PROGRAMS WHICH FACILITATE THE PRODUCTION, IMPROVEMENT; OR PRESERVATION. OF LOW AND. MODERATE INCOIVIE HOUSING FOR FY 2008 and FY 2009 WHEREAS, pursuant to'Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety .Code. Section 33000 et seq. (CRL), the Petaluma Community Development Commission (PCDC) has established and implemented a .Low and Moderate Income Housing- Fund .(Housing Fund); and WHEREAS, the Housing Fund is utilized for the production, improvement, and preservation of low and moderate income housing; aiid WI~EI2EAS, Section 33334:3(4) of 'the CRL requires the PCDC to make a determination that PCDC funds expended from the Housing Fund:forplanning and administrative expenses are necessary for the production, improvement and preservation of low and moderate income housing; and WHE~AS, in order to comply wth~Secton 33334.3(4) of the CRL for fiscal years 2008 .and 200.9 the PCDC desires to make a determination that. funds expended from the Housing Fund in the amount of approximately seven percent (7%) of the total bud'getwere necessary for the production, improvement and preservation of low and moderate income housing, such amount not being disproportionate to the .amount actually spent for the costs of production, improvement or preservation of housing. ; N®W, THEREI+OR>E',~>BE IT RESOLVED'')c1FIAT the Petaluma CommunityDevelopment Commission hereby finds and determines-that fun4s ;expended from the Housing Fund for planning and administrative expenses in' fiscal years .2008 and 2009 were necessary for the. production, improvement and preservation of low and moderate incorrie housing.. .Adopted this.5th;4ay:of October 2009 by the following vote: Commissioner Aye No Absent 20 ATTACHMENT #3 A JOINT, 1ZESOLUTION'OF TIIE CITX COUNCIL OF PETALUMA AND THE PETALUMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPIVIENT COMMISSION ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEAI.~'H AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445 AND CONSENTING T`O THE USE - OF PETALUMA COIVIIVIUNITX DEVELOPMENT COM_1VIISSION (PCDC) TAX INCREMENT FUNDS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE MERGED PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the Petaluma Community Development Commission ("PCDC") is a redevelopment agency ofthe City of Petaluma {"City") existing pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq. (the "CRL"), and pursuant to the authority granted thereunder, has the responsibility to carry out the Central., Business District (CBD) and. Petaluma Community Development (PCD) Redevelopment Plans ("Redevelopment Plans") for the Merged Redevelopment Project Area ("Merged Project Area"); and WIFIEREAS, the PCDC has conducted a midterm review of its 2007-2012 Implementation Plan pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section.33490 and has approved an Addendum. thereto to provide for installation and construction of certain public .improvements ("Public Improvements") located in the Merged Project Area and more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WIIEREAS, Health acid Safety Code Section 33445 provides that a redevelopment agency may, with the consent of'the legislative body, pay all or a portion of the cost of land for and the cost and installation of public improvements either within or without the project area if the agency and the legislative body determine that:. a. The buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the project area or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located; and b. No other reasonable means of financing the buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements'are available to the community; and c. The payment of funds. for the cost of buildings,. facilities, structures, or other improvements will assist in the elimination of'one or more blighting conditions inside the project area; and d. The project is con~s>'stent with the Implementation Plan adopted by the agency pursuant to Health. and' Safety.Code Section 33490; and WHEREAS, the PCDC and the City desire to undertake the Public Improvements; and WIHE>f2EAS, the installation acid construction of the Public Improvements will be of benefit tp the Merged Project Areas will :eliminate blighting conditions in the Merged Project Area', and will be consistent with the PCDC's Implementation.Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Cityhas no unrestricted general fund revenue available to undertake the construction. and installation ofth~e~ Public hnproverrients without a reduction in vital community services, and has 21 determined that it does not have and cannot reasonably obtain revenue for such purposes, anal therefore no other reasonable means of financing the Public Improvements exists. NOW, 'I'IIEREFORE,. CBE IT RESOLVED by the Petaluma Community Development Commission and.. the- City Council of the City of Petaluma as follows: Section 1. The findngs• sta"ted herein are true and correct and are. adopted as the findings of the Petaluma Community Development 'Commission and the_ City Council. Section 2: .Based :upon the facts. set. forth in. the foregoing, recitals, the City Council hereby fins that (i) the expenditure of tax increment. funds (including the proceeds of tax allocation bonds secured by such funds) to undertake the Public Irr"provemehts,`will be of'benefit to the Merged Project Area,, (ii) no other reasonable means of financing the public improvements and the project. are reasonably available, (iii) completion of the Public Improvements will assist in the elimination of blighting conditions. n'the Merged Project Area or provide housing for low-or-moderate income persons, and (iv) completion of`the Public .Improvements is consistent with,the PCDC's Implementation Plan, as amended, for the Merged Project :Area. NOW, TI~EREFORE, BE I'1c FiJRTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City ofPetaluma as follows: Section. 3. The City Council of'the'Ctyof Petaluma hereby consents: to the expenditure of approximately Fourteen 1Vlihion Dollars ($14 Million) in tax increment funds (including tax allocation bond proceeds) for the construction and installation of the Publ~i~c~ Improvements. Section 4. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to undertake such actions as necessary to carry out the intent of`this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2009. AYES: NOES: AB'SBNT: ABSTAIN: .MAYOR ATTEST; ;~ 22 Exhibit A Public Improvements FY 2009110 - FY 2011112 Petaluma Community Development Commission Projected Project Title Project .Expenditures, Number FY 2009110 to FY 2011112 Petaluma Boulevard :Street Improvements 0200304 $ 6,000 Old Redwood Highway'Intercflange Widening CSOI304 $ 9,000,000 E. Washington Street Interchange Improvements P201160 $ 3,870,000 Auto. Center Drive Extension - ... 053'101'002 $ 1,346,000 Source: Petaluma Community Development Commission, City of Petaluma Finance Department; City of Petaluma Public Works Department. 23 ATTACHMENT #4 A JOINT .RESOLUTION :OF' B'HE CITY COUNCIL OF PETALUMA AND THE PE~'ALUMA "COMMUNITY DEVELOBIVIEN'I` COMIVIISSION~ADOPT,ING FINDLNGS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA COlVI1VIUNITI'REDEVEI,OPIVIENT LAW SECTION 33334.2(g) FOR THE USE O>F' LOW AND MODERA'T'E INCOME HOUSING FUNDS OUTSIDE THE MERGED PRO.IECT AREA WI=IEREAS, the City of Petaluma ("Cit"y") may receive planning applications for development of affordable housing projects- outside the Merged Project Area which provide affordable housing for very low-, low- and/or moderate-income'households; and. WHEREAS, these projects wquld expand the City's stock of affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the developer(s) of these projects may request financial assistance from the Petaluma Community Development Commission ("PCDC"); and WHEREAS, the PCDC may li'ave funds available in its Low and Moderate Housing Fund ("Housing Fund") to provide the requested assistance; and WHEREAS, the Central Business District (CBD) and Petaluma. Community Development (PCD) .Redevelopment Plans ("Redevelopment Plans") and Irriplementation Plan, as amended by the PCDC, contain goals and objectives that support the production of affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the use of the Housing Fund for such affordable housing is consistent with the Redevelopment Plans and Implementation.Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to its.authority under Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq. ("CRT:" ), the PCDC desires to provide financial assistance to such affordable housing projects from the Housing Fund to enable them to be~financially feasible; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2(g) authorizes the PCDC to use monies from the Housing Fund outside a redevelopment project area only upon adoption of resolutions by the PCDC and the City Council finding that such use will be of benefit to the Merged Project Area; and WHEREAS, the City Council/Commission desires by this ..Resolution to declare that the expenditure of monies from the PCDC's Housing Fund for affordable. housing projects outside the Merged.Project Area will 6e of benefit to the Merged Project Area provided that such monies are used in accordance with the requirements of the CRL. NOW, TI=IEREFOR>E, ~E IT RESOLVED, by the City Council/Commission of the City of Petaluma as fohows Section. 1. The City Council/Commission finds and determines that the expenditure of monies from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for affordable housing projects outside the Merged Project Area will increase the availability of affordable Housing in the City, will be of benefit to the Merged Projecf Area in accordance with the.requrements of the CRL, will further the goals of the Redevelopment Plans; and will be consistent. with the Implementation Plan as amended by the PCDC. 24 Section 2. The City Council/Commission hereby authorizes the City Manager/Executive Director or his desigriee to take. such actions. as necessary to carry out the intent of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND AII)OPTEI) this day of , 20U9. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 12965'71.1 25