HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 08/15/1994August 1 ~, 1994 Vol. 28, Page 303
t REGULAR 1VIEETING
2 PETALUMA CITE' COUNCIL
3 1VfONDAI', AUGUST 15, 1994
4 ROLL CALL 3:00 p.m.
s Present: Parkerson, Read, Hanulton, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
6 Absent: Vice Mayor Sobel
~ COUNCIL COMMENT
s Carole Barlas -she would like to be more informed about how the Council agenda process
9 works. It was agreed by all the Councilmembers that a study session should be scheduled
to which would allow them to resolve various questions they have been asking.
ii Nancy Read -regarding the local cable television access and the abuse of the Council
i2 Chambers itself by members of the local access projects, she questions the validity of
13 programs at which people are sitting on the Council "desk", utilizing the telephone in the
to Council Chambers, speaking unpleasant words, and related unprofessional conduct. The cup
is holders are no longer available, the camera has been unusable at Council meetings and the
i6 general demeanor of some of tl~e users is very questionable. She would like agendized "the
t~ use of the Council Chambers".
is Mayor Hilligoss noted she has received a thank you note from the Morningstar Subdivision
t9 Homeowners Association for the City's action to develop permit parking near the new junior
20 college campus.
2t MINUTES
22 The minutes for August 1 were approved as amended:
23 Page 284, Line 32 -change "energy savings" to franchise money.
2a Page 285, Line 8 -the time should be "12:00"; /
2s Page 292, Line 38 -The lady's name is "Onita".,/
26 CONSENT CALENDAR
2~ The following items which are noncontroversial and have been reviewed by the City Council
2s and staff were enacted by one motion which was introduced by Nancy Read and seconded
29 by Ross Parkerson.
3o AYES: Parkerson, Read, Hamilton, Barlas, Shea, Ma}'or Hilligoss
31 NOES: None
32 ABSENT: Vice Mayor Sobcl
33 RESO.94-225 NCS
34 CLAilVIS AND BILLS
3s Resolution 94-225 NCS approving Claims and Bills #38350 through #38676.
Page 304, Vol. 28 August 15,1994
i RES0.94-2261VCS
z STREET CLOSURE - E STREET
3 Resolution 94-226 NCS approving closure of E Street between Sixth Street and Seventh
a Street on Sunday, August 28, 1994, between 2:00 p.m. and 9:00 p:m. for a neighborhood
s party.
6 ORI). 1960 NCS
~ TAX RATE FOR DEBT SERVICE
s Introduce and adopt Ordinance 1960 NCS adopting tax rate for debt service as $0.00887
9 based on an assessed valuation of $2,501,814,285 as adjusted for debt service rates. The tax
io rate for last year was $0.0107 on a preliminary assessed valuation adjusted for debt service
ii of $2,464,718,863.
is RESO.94-227 NCS
13 RIVER COMMITTEE
is Resolution 94-227 NCS designating Don Bennett as a member of the Petaluma River Access
is and Enhancement Plan Citizen Project Committee.
i6 RESO. 94-228 NCS
i~ WISEMAN AIRPORT PARK PLAYGROUND
is Resolution 94-228 NCS accepting completion of the Wiseman .Airport Park Playground
i9 construction by Ross Recreation Equipment Company. The total cost was $49,316.
ao * * * * * End of Consent Calendar
zi TEEN PROGRAM STATUS
Zz Recreation Director Jim Carr advised the Council that there had been a visit to 'the Santa
z3 Rosa skateboard park and the Fairgrounds Board will be discussing. the subject ati their
as September 21 meeting which begins at 6:00 p.m. They do have a video of that skateboard
as park which will be shown to the Council.
z6 SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY -
2~ CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
zs The Council was asked to consider the proposal by the Sonoma County Transportation
29 Authority (SCTA) of a proposed expanded project review process. There was a very long
3o and detailed discussed between the Council and Catherine Braschi, Executive Director, of
31 the Sonoma County Transportation Authority.
32 The Council agreed that the review process should be voluntary; there should be no penalty
33 levied; there was much concern about this becoming another "regional jurisdication with
34 related mandates"; this should be a group of municipalities which voluntarily works together
35 to respond to or resolve area-wide, cumulative anticipated traffic problems. The Council
36 was supportive of the concept.
August 15, 199~F Vol. 28, Page 305
i SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
2 COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
3 This plan has been developed by tl~e Sonoma County Transportation Authority Citizen
a Advisory Committee. It is staffs view this document is premature as a policy document.
s Further, they feel the recommended policies are in direct conflict with the Sonoma County
6 Transportation Authority Congestion Management Plan as well as both the city and the
~ county general plans.
s The Council discussed this document at length with Catherine Braschi. It was the Council's
9 feeling that the City encourages tl~e efforts being made to see how different cities deal with
io transportation issues. This is a good starting place to write a policy document, although the
ii document as it is now is not acceptable. The document needs a lot of work to establish a
i2 working policy for all the cities and the county. It was mentioned again there is a concern
13 this is another layer of government starting.
is OItD. 1961 NCS
is RADAR ENFORCEABLE SPEED I,IIVIITS
16 Introduce Ord. 1961 NCS establishing radar enforceable speed zones in the City of
i~ Petaluma. Alan Tilton, Traffic Engineer, presented the ordinance to the Council. He
is explained that radar enforceable speed zones are established after doing a study of traffic
19 speed, determining the speed at which 85% of the vehicles travel at a given location, and
Zo taking into consideration "high collision rates" or factors not readily accessible to motorists.
ai After these evaluations are completed, the Police Department, the Traffic Committee and the
z2 Municipal Court are requested to approve the speed zone recommendations. Upon receipt
i3 of all the foregoing as is the case here, an ordinance, which lists the various speed zones in
2a Petaluma, can be adopted. Once the ordinance becomes effective, copies are transmitted to
zs the Courts for their decisions on speed violation tickets. The ordinance was introduced by
i6 Ross Parkerson and seconded by Lori Shea.
27 AYES: Parkerson, Read, Hamilton, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
zs NOES: None
29 ABSENT: Vice Mayor Sobcl
3o RESO. 94-229 NCS
31 SUPPORT POMEROY OFFER TO DEDICATE LANDS
32 The Pomeroy Corporation is negotiating with the State Lands Commission for river
33 frontage. Pomeroy is offering to dedicate the land in question, 7.7 acres, to the City, which
34 land will provide riverfront access and a possible part site. It would also provide an
3s extension of the Hopper Street right-of--way and access to two potential sites where a trail
36 could connect Hopper Street to the Petaluma Marina, with the approval of both
37 CALTRANS and the railroad.
3s There are two parcels involved. The 7.7 ac--es are located partly along the railroad right of
39 way nearly to the U. S. Highway 101 overcrossing then towards the river from the railroad
ao right-of--way. The other is a 3,5 acre parcel which is located at the tip of the peninsula with
at the McNear Canal on tl~e north side and the Petaluma River on the south side. This piece
a2 they wish to sell to the City. Fu--ther, the Pomeroy Corporation July 29, 1994, letter says
43 that provided that the City's offer to purchase is consistent with Pomeroy's valuation of this
as peninsula property, a donation of twenty percent. (20%) of the net. proceeds will be made by
as Pomeroy to the City at the close of escrow.
.r•: t. ~ n
Page 306, Vol. 28 August 15, 1994
i The donation will be deposited in a Trust Fund to be established by the City Council, and
z shall be used exclusively for constructing facilities associated with the River Enhancement
3 Plan.
a Resolution 94-229 NCS supporting Pomeroy Corporation's offer to dedicate lands to the
s City of Petaluma. Introduced by Jane Hamilton, seconded by Ross Parkerson.
6 AYES: Parkerson, Read, Hamilton, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
7 NOES: None
s ABSENT: Vice Mayor Sobel
9 RESO. 94-230 N.CS
io POMEROY -APPLY TO OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
ii Resolution 94-230 NCS authorizing an application to the Sonoma County Agricultural
iz Preservation and Open Space District for funds to acquire approximately 3.5 acres of
t3 property located at the easterly tip of McNear peninsula. The Mayor mentioned that a
is number of years ago, this property had been promised by the company as a gift to the City.
is Introduced by Jane Hamilton, seconded by Ross Parkerson.
16 AYES`. Parkerson, Read, Hamilton, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
i~ NOES: None
is ABSENT: Vice Mayor Sobel
19 RESO. 94-231 NCS
zo STORM DRAIN REIIViBIIRSEIVIENT - LINDBERG LANE
zi Resolution 94-231 NCS of intent to authorize a storm drain reimbursement agreement for H
zz & H Properties on Lindberg Lane. Councilwoman Hamilton left the meeting. In order for
z3 George Honore, H & H properties, to develop his property, there needs to be installation of
za approximately 700 feet of off-site, downstream storm drain, both 36" and 48" lines. The
zs storm drain system is proposed to be part of a portion of the Sonoma County Water Agency
z6 Master Drainage Plan from Payran Street along Lindberg Lane as well as parallel to U. S.
z~ Highway 101 freeway along Kenilworth Drive. Introduced by Nancy Read, seconded by
zs Ross Parkerson.
29 AYES: Parkerson, Read, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
3o NOES: None
31 ABSENT: Hamilton, Vice Mayor Sobel
3z RESO. 94-232 NCS
33 ABANDONED VEF[ICLES
3a Resolution 94-232 NCS supporting the establishment of the Sonoma County Abandoned
3s Vehicle Abatement Service Authority. When established the county based "Authority" will
36 require each vehncle registered in Sonoma County to be assessed $1.00, annually at the time
37 of vehicle registration, to fund its activities. Those funds distributed to the City of Petaluma
3s will be placed into a special finance account to be drawn upon by various departments of the
39 City for work relatied to abandoned vehicle removal on public, as well as private, property.
ao It is estimated Petaluma vehicle registrations would generate about $23,000 each year, after
ai deductions of 1% each for the Department of Motor Vehicles, Sonoma County and the
az "Authority". Introduced by Carole Barlas, seconded by Ross Parkerson.
a3 AYES: Parkerson, Read, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
as NOES: None
as ABSENT: Hamilton, Vice Mayor Sobel
August I ~, 1994 Vol. 28, Page 307
~•,p
> RESO.94-233 NCS
2 U. S. I~iGAWAY 101 CO1tRIDOIt PLAN
3 Resolution 94-233 NCS of continuing support of the 1989 U. S. Highway 101 Corridor Plan
a as the "major investment study" for the U. S. Highway 101 Corridor in Sonoma County.
s Introduced by Nancy Read, seconded by Carole Barlas.
6 AYES: Parkerson, Read, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
~ NOES: None
s ABSENT: Hamilton, Vice Mayor Sobel
9 RESO. 94-234 NCS
io INTENTION TO FINANCE EQUIPMENT
>> Resolution 94-234 NCS of intention to finance certain equipment for Fiscal Year 1994-95 in
12 an amount "not reasonably expected to exceed $1,150,000". This action will allow the City
13 to purchase vehicles prior to t}~e actual financing documents are finaled. Introduced by Ross
to Parkerson, seconded by Lori Shea.
15 AYES: Parkerson, Read, Barlas, Shea. Mayor Hilligoss
16 NOES: None
t7 ABSENT: Hamilton, Vice Ma~~or Sobel
is ItESO.94-235 NCS
19 COTTONWOOD GOLF CLUB
20 Resolution 94-235 NCS consenting to the assignment of lease between Empire Golf and the
21 City to Cottonwood Golf, Inc., a California corporation and the City. They estimate that
22 construction will begin in Spring of 1995. Tntroduced by Nancy Read, seconded by Ross
z3 Parkerson.
2a AYES: Parkerson, Read, Barlas, Shea. Mayor Hilligoss
25 NOES: None
26 ABSENT: Hamilton, Vice Mayor Sobcl
27 CLOSED SESSION
2s The Council. recessed to closed sessipn at 5:20 pursuant to Government Code §54956.8 to
29 have a conference with the real property negotiator on 1200 Casa Grande Road -City and
3o Van de Wark.
31 AD.IOUItN to dinner
3z The Council adjourned to dinner at La Vera Pizza, 840 Petaluma Blvd. North
33 IZ®LL CALL 7:00 p.i17.
34 Present: Parkerson, Read, Hamilton, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
3s Absent: Vice Ma~~or Sobcl
36 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
37 The Pledge of Allegiance ~-vas led by Terry Kosewic.
3s 1VIONIENT OF SILENCE
39 PiJBLIC ~.®1VIIVIENT
ao Former Councilmember Bonnie Nelson, 1.53 Railbridge Road, Oroville -addressed the
at Council about her concern for Petaluma. She urged the 16 candidates who have taken out
a2 nomination papers for City Council not to seek more than $1.00 from each person to pay for
43 their campatgn. If you do get money from the public for your campaign, you should give it
44 to the Fire or the Police Department.
Page 308, Vol. 28
August 15, 1994
t Bill Brotman, 2009 Willow Drive - he feels the conditional use permits are a problem
z because there is no way to follow up on them. Retired people- could be invited to volunteer
3 their knowledge and experience to be of assistance to the City. Regarding Ross Parkerson,
a he feels Ross should have run for Council.
s COUNCIL COMMENTS
6 Ross Parkerson -the Rainier question is now scheduled to be heard. for the second time on
~ September 12. He suggested that Councilmembers submit the questions they -have. about
s Rainier now so that staff would have an opportunity to study and to be able to answer the
9 questions at that meeting.
to Lori Shea - it has been about two months since we talked about the Taco Wagon parked on
ti Mary Street in the evenings. Staff has not responded about the steps that are being taken.
tz She would like to have an answer.
t3 RESO. 94-236 NCS
to ABATEMENT -.231 GRANT AVENUE
is All persons. who planned to speak repeated the "oath to tell the truth". Jane Thomsen of the
16 Planning Department reviewed the nuisance problems that have been: observed at this location. The
t~ property is owned by Charlis Meador and was subject of a sirriilar action in 1993:. The conditions on
to the property generated a neighbor complaint to the City again this year. Mrs. Thomsen read her
t9 August 15, 1994, staff report to the Council. Fire Inspector Lonnie. Armstrong, confirmed the
zo information read to the Council by Mrs. Thomsen. The hearing was opened. Gharlis Meador said
zt that five (5) days to abate the problem is very short time.' Her yard man has been .given the approval
zz to do the work, but he has had family problems. She lives in Lake Gourity most of the Time and she
z3 seldom uses the 231 Grant Steet location. The hearing was closed. Resolution 94-236 NCS was
za introduced by Lori Shea and seconded by Ross Parkerson.
2s AYES: Parkerson,. Read, Hamilton, Barlas, Shea, MayorHilligoss
26 NOES: None
27 ABSENT: Vice Mayor Sobel
zs PETALUMA RIVER FLOOD MANAGEMENT
z9 REPORT FROM ARMS' CORPS OF ENGINEERS
3o Avery short video was shown of the 1986 flood. Lyn Hawkins, Civil Engineer from the U.
31 S. Army Corps of Engineers, reviewed the proposal.
3z It was noted this project is for "100-year event" flood protection. They have been studying
33 ~ two alternatives, the LLP -Locally Preferred Plan (that is the City's preference) and the
34 NED -National Economic Development Plan )that is the Army Corps'). The LLP Plan
3s would provide protection fora " 100-year" level of event under General Plan conditions and
36 a "4D-year" level of event at the optimum buildout in 2005. The NED Plan would provide
37 protection fora "15-year" level of event under General.Plan conditions and a "10-year" level
3s of event protection at the optimum buildout in the year 2005.
39 It was mentioned the Army Corps. had looked at a number of alternatives, such as an
ao eastside bypass, a Denman dam, raising homes, other channel improvements, different
at channel designs, different materials, the length of the channel improvements, storm flow
az capacity.
August 15, 1994 Vol. 28, Page 309
i They have studied the potentially significant impacts such as water surface elevations,
z biological impacts,. species impacts, socio-economic impacts and other impacts. They have
3 looked at economic benefits, social benefits, and costs.
a Some of the improvements will include the a--ea between the Lakeville bridge for 3,200 feet
s to the confluence of the Petaluma River with Lynch Creek.
6 The hearing was opened and the following named persons spoke:
~ Bill Evans, Madison Village Resident/owner - he had objections to the "taking" of some of
s their valuable park area which would be utterly devastated. Wants a compromise.
9 John Cheney, 55 Rocca. Drive - has a letter from the Steinbecks at 125 Rocca who want the
io project completed as soon as possible. Regarding Madison Village, anything you can do to
ii mitigate that would be Tine, but we cannot allow the flood control to be held up. The project
iz can't be held off any more. We go through "heck" every winter.
13 John Hess, 9 Natalie Circle, Madison Village President -the CC&R's require that we look at
is situations that would impact the value of our property. The Corps project will impact us.
is About 75% of our common area park will disappear.. The service road will be a definite
16 potential of a crime problem. They have hired their own hydrologist. They are upset with
i~ the Environmental Impact Report (EiR). You aan write an EIR and worry about mice and
~s birds, but you should also concern yourselves with the people at Madison Village. They feel
i9 they are not getting a fair shake. They were told about this in February of 1993, and were
zo surprised by the amount of width of the river and the amount of land. The EIR talks about
zi taking "slivers". They don't feel the part: is a mere "sliver".
zz Everett Sartori, 59 .Rossi Drive - we can't afford another flood. Please get this project
z3 going.
za Margaret Cordrey, lived at ~ Pidgeon Court since 1976 - we lost value on our house when it
zs flooded. There were 3S" of water in our house. She questioned the people at Madison
z6 Village being concerned about a little piece of earl: when 500 homes were damaged in the
z~ 1982 flood. Every time it rains we worry, and we go to the Payran bridge to see the water.
zs Collette McGeough, Natalie Circle, Madison Village - we want the City to notice us; she
z9 commented about. the "sliver" of land; we don't want to stop the project; come over and look
3o at our property.
31 Jim Veith, 3 Elinor Ct. -this old project is ten years behind schedule. The outlet mall is
3z going to cause more flooding. He is sorry about the park, but "our homes are more
33 important".
3a Douglas Condrotte, 13 Natalie Circle, 1Vfadison Village -this will decrease the value of our
3s property. He wants compensation. ~ -
36 David Gazzano, 6 Payran Street - he is concerned because construction on the project will
37 directly affect his parcel which is next to the Payran Street bridge. The bridge span will
3s come into the middle of their front yard. He is willing to negotiate at the City's earliest
39 convenience. They will have to relocate temporarily during the construction. It' is
ao imperative for this project to go through.
ai Jeannine Drew, 15 Natalie Circle, Madison Village -don't overlook us, we want some input
az on the plan. The taking of their common area is quite substantial. Doesn't like not being
a3 talked to.
44 Carolyn O'Neill, 15 Rocca Drive - we hope the project goes forward as quickly as possible.
Page 310, Vol. 28 August 15, 1994
i Every winter when it rains, I get strange. Whenever I do something to the house, I wonder
z if will be flooded. I was not. able to raise my house which we had wanted. The riverwalk is
3 a good idea. We need. to do something to. make the river larger so it can carry the water. I
a appreciate that the City Council is considering this.
s Ewen and Jane McKecknie, 49 Jess Avenue - I admit the project could be prettier. It is
6 important that it goes in now.
~ David Moore, 19 Bernice Court -the project is essential. The river is such an .amenity.
s Upstream should,. be' able to absorb as much water as possible.
9 David Keller, 1327 IStreet - In 1982 he was living in west Marin. We should strive to
io protect those things that are in danger. The .EIS is woefully incomplete. What is the
u assumption by the 40-year project? Show all this on a map. Regarding toxic groundwater,
i2 why aren't property owners being required to stop.?
13 Mark Milligan, 13 Jess Avenue -these people are talking about giving up part of a park.
is Aren't people on Jess giving up a lot of their back-yards? He doesn't hear anyone
is complaining about the noise and inconvenience during the flood fix.
i6 Dawn Marie Walsh, 117 Rocca Drive -she has lived here 18 years.. She moved there in
i~ 1988. She was frightened in 1993. Please continue on with the flood~control project.
is Vince Landof, 12 Cordelia Drive -how come the tornados and. hurricanes of recent years,
19 we see the Army Corps of Engineers fixing the problems already, and we have waited 11
zo years so far? He feels there will be more water coming down from upstream because of all
2i the buildings up there. The neighbors want the project now. The park people (Madison
as Village), he questioned putting their park first, and the rest of the area has riot received the
23 gold invitation that- Mr: Hess (Madison Village) is looking for. Mr. Hess has been meeting
Za with the city for months.
zs Mr. Landof talked about moving some victorian homes to become Bed and Breakfasts. Put
26 them upstream. Mr. Landof was the last member of the public addressing the Council.
a~ The Army Corps of Engineers responded. It was noted most of the questions will be
zs addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement. The Corps has figured the upstream
z9 buildout at the year 2005 according to the City's General Plan. Plus, they add a factor that
3o would figure development even beyond the proposed General Plan figure. They had to
31 assume how the valley (beyond the Gity's Urban Limits) would develop; how it would look
3z in the future.
33 Assistant City Manager Salmons said they will start in earnest in negotiating with some of
3a the other properties that will be in an acquisition process. We are early in the acquisition
3s process. The Army Corps doesn't have us in the acquisition process until -.next year. We
36 have a year and a half to work with the property owners.
37 City Engineer Review -The Army Corps has to look 50 years into the future: The Corps
3s has to make land-use assumptions beyond anybody's general plan. The Corps used the city's
39 General Plan to determine the buildout that is proposed within the Urban Limit Line. The
ao Corps also used. the County General Plan. Their data is calculated on accepted, established
ai planning procedures.
Aubusr l i, 199=t Vol. 28, Page 311
> It is important to look at all the General Plans that affect the area. "No net fill" has been
z factored into the Corps projections. ("No net rill" means that when a building is constructed
3 upstream from the Payran area, every square foot of the building's ground floor is calculated,
a and a similar amount of land on that property is lowered to equal the square footage of that
s building's floor space. For instance, the Outlet Stores' parking lot may have 5 to 6 feet of
6 water in it. What he was explaining and describing were the storm water "detention ponds"
~ that are in town.)
s Council questions -Does development upstream create higher flood downstream? What is
9 the development that is assumed for the. years 2005 and 2040? The Council would like to
io see some text on that calculation as well as a map that shows development upstream and the
ii amount of flood protection that ~a~e are talking about regarding changes in the storage
>z capacity of Denman -Willowbrook? ~~~e are altering the flood plain. Can there be more
13 planting along the levee?
>a Corps comments - it was notes} the the proposed sheet piling in the river channel will keep
>s what toxics may exist. from Leaching into the river. Toxics are a local control problem, not a
16 Corps problem. The major pcrrpose of vertical walls is to provide the smoothest possible
>~ wall to make water move fast. They will put in as many trees as possible. The access roads
>s are for maintenance. The hearing was closed.
19 O1tD. 1962 NCS
zo 70NING ORDINANCE AIVIENDIVIENTS
zi Introduce Ordinance 1962 NCS which amends the Zoning Ordinance 1072 NCS sections as
zz noted below:
z3 Article 4 -amend to include the Riverfi~ont Warehouse and Gateway Overlay Districts.
za Section 1-203 - amend definitions to clarify existing description and to provide additional
zs terms for "Live Entertainment";
z6 Section 2-100 - amend to include the "Riverfront Warehouse";
z~ Section 6-500 -eliminate reference to number of stories permitted;
zs Section 6-600 - Zones R I -8,000, R 1-6,500, and R 1-5,000 amend minimum lot size ;
z9 Section 7-406 -add "Accessory Dwellings" to conditionally permitted uses in R-C districts;
3o Section 7-_500 -eliminate reference to number of stories permitted;
31 Section 7-601 - R-C district amend minimum lol size;
3z Section 7-603 -amend minimum front and rear yard sizes;
33 Section 8-500 -eliminate reference to n~u»ber of stories permitted;
3a Section 8-601. - .R-1\4-G .district amend minimum lot size;
35 Section°10-304 - assessor}~ uses setbacks same as underlying district;
36 Section 10-403.2 -delete;
37 Section 10-403.3 -amends single family dwelling in C-O districts; ~ ' .
38 Section 10-405 -amends single family dwelling use in C-O districts;
39 Section I 1-30.1 -accessory uses setbacks same as underlying district;
ao Section 1 1-416 -add live entertainment incidental to a principally permitted or conditional use;
a> Section 1 1-500 -eliminate reference to number of stories permitted;
az Section 12-203 -add an exception, for uses involving live entertainment;
Page 312, Vol. 28 August 15, 199=1
i Section 12-204 -add an exception, for uses. involving live entertainment;
a Section 12-205 -add an exception, for°uses involving live entertainment;
3 Section 12-301 -accessory uses setbacks same as underlying. district;
a Section 12-417 -add live entertainment incidental to a principally permitted or conditional
s use;
6 Section 12-600 -eliminate reference to number of stories permitted;
~ Section 13-301 -accessory uses setbacks same as underlying district;
s Section 13-306 -add an exception, for uses involving live entertainment;
9 Section 13-428 -add live entertainment incidental to a principally permitted or conditional
io use;
ii Section 13-500 -eliminate reference to number of storied permitted;
iz Section 14-301 -accessory uses setbacks same as underlying district;
13 Section 14-406.1 -add certain services in M-L districts;
is Section 14-500 -eliminate reference to number of storied permitted;
is Section 21-201.1(f) -add section allowing Planning. Director to grant exceptions for
16 accessory buildings;
i~ Section 21-201.1(g) -add. section on trellis size;
is Section 21-202.7(g) -add exclusion "gun repair, sale of guns or ammunition" to home
i9 occupation;
Zo Section 21-306(a) -add regulations on alcohol and gasoline sales
zi Section 23-500 -these are new wall and hedge regulations;
a2 Section 24-308 -add section on yard encroachments and Zoning Administrator authority to
23 grant exceptions;
2a Section 24-500 -delete;
2s Section 26-401 -delete mandatory SPARC review for accessory dwellings and waiver of
26 SPARC review fee
z~ Section 26-500 -delete mandatory SPARC review for accessory dwellings and waiver of
zs SPARC review fee
z9 Introduced by Ross Parker-son and seconded by Councilmembers Hamilton, Barlas and Shea.
3o AYES: Parkerson, Read, Hamilton, Barlas, Shea, Mayor Hilligoss
31 NOES: None
32 ABSENT: Vice Mayor Sobel
33 A~J~U}lZly
34 The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. to Monda , ugust 22, 1994.
r~
3s M. Patricia I=Iilligoss Mayor
36 ATTEST: ~ _
`P /
37 atricia E. Bernard, City Clerk
38