HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/06/1992July 6, 1992
1
2
Vol. 27, Page 115 •: ~:
3 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
4 PETALUMA CITY COUNCIL
s Jlily 6, 1992
6
7
8
9 ~ REORGANIZE CITY COUNCIL
to VICE MAYOR
11 It was moved by Brian Sobel and seconded by Vice Mayor Woolsey to elect Jack
12 Cavanagh to the office of Vice Mayor for the next six months.
13 AYES: Read, Davis, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
14 NOES: None
15 ABSENT: None
16 ABSTAIN: Cavanagh
17
18 ~ LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS
19 Mayor Hilligoss made the following City Council Liaison Assignments for Fiscal Year 1992-93
20
21 Airport -Lynn Woolsey
22 Parks & Recreation Commission -Bonnie Nelson
23 Planning Commission -Nancy Read
24 Traffic Committee -Michael Davis
25 Library Advisory Board -Brian Sobel
26
27 CONSENT CALENDAR
2s The following items which are noncontroversial and have been reviewed by the City
29 Council and staff were enacted by one I110t10n which was introduced by Michael Davis
3o and seconded by Bon,~ie Nelson
31 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss
32 NOES: None
33 ABSENT: Sobel (absent from dais)
34
35 RESO. 92-156 NCS
36 CLAIMS AND BILLS
37 Reso. 92-156 NCS approving Claims and Bills Nos. 20375 through 20662
38
39 RESO. 92-157 NCS
4o EAST WASHINGTON PARK ENTRY BRIDGE
41 Reso. 92-157 NCS awarding bid for the East Washington Park entry bridge to Ghilotti Brothers,
42 Inc. of San Rafael in the amount of $135,550.
43
44 ~ RESO. 92-158 NCS
45 SONOMA COUNTY TRANSIT COALITION BALLOT MEASURE
46 Reso. 92-158 NCS declining to 'support the Sonoma Comity Transportation. Coalition
47 proposal fora 1992 ballot measure for creation of two county transit district.
48
49
so * * * * * End of Consent * * * *
Page 116, Vol. 27
July 6, 1992
3 RESO. 92-1.59 NCS
4 ' RUSSIAN RIVER-COTATI INTERTIE AMENDMENT
5 Reso. 92-159 NCS authorize City Manager to sign Amendment, No. 8 to Agreement for
6 Water Supply and Construction of Russian River-Cotati Intertie Project'. Amendments
7 that have been approved .are (a) the pH Control Treatment Equipment which would
s control the high level of free .carbon dioxide., the Russian River water quality early
9 warning system which. would continuously monitor Russian River water quality to detect
1o early contamination prior to delivery to customers, (b) North Marin Aqueduct and
11 Kastania Pumping, Plant which would necessitate entering into a new agreement with
12 North Marin, terminating the existing licensing agreement. and providing for the
13 acquisition of this segment of the North Marin -Aqueduct and the Kastania pumping plant,
14 (c) Water Transmission System Expansion Studies, and (d) Marin 1Vlunicipal Water
15 District Water Sales. which would increase their water delivery by an :additional 10,000
16 acre feet of Russian River water. This is to be delivered on an as available basis using
17 only "as available" transmission capacity. Introduced by Lynn Woolsey, seconded by
1s Vice Mayor Cavanagh.
19 AYES: Read, Woolsey, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss
20 NOES: Davis, Nelson
21 ABSENT: Sobel (absent t~rom dais)
22
23 REDWOOD EMPIRE. SPORTS ASSOCIATION
24 A draft lease agreement was presented' to Council regarding the: proposed ighted softball
25 complex,. club house, restaurants, tot.loGs, sand. and grass volleyball and batting cages
26 located on a portion of the 100 acre park cite on East Washington. Some of the language
27 change would be Environmental ~~npac-~ Staidy, addtiotal la~aguage provided'city has
2s moved the project fo~-wurd diligently a~ul if items a, b & c above are not completed
29 within 4 years from date of autlao~zzatiora this lease shall be terminated..
30 _
31 Rich Rudnansky, City Attorney would like the following language added:.
32 It is understood and agreed that. this document shall. not becorne art .effective lease until
33 such time as environmental revie-vs have been completed and adopted and all required
34 mitigation measures are made u purl of this document and/or are consistent with the
35 terms of this agreement.
36
37 Hold Harmless: Lessee agrees to defend and hold Lessor, its elected officials.. .
38 .....
39
4o Council consensus that there be a mediator between Lessor and Lessee.
41
42 Right of First Refusal language shoed be changed.
43
44 There was concern about the distance between the playing fields and the high
45 amenity homes in this area. Council was advised that the Urban Separator is a
46 300' buffer, but the parcel that the cucumber farnr.s located on is designated for
47 residential development. This is directly adjacent to the fields.
July 6, 1992
Vol. 27, Page117
1 WILMAR FIRE DEPARTMENT -OUTSIDE WATER CONNECTION
2 A motion was made to approve t11e outside water connection for a pressurized fire
3 sprinkler system to the Wilmar Volunteer Fire Department and to not waive connection
4 fees. Introduced by Michael Davis, seconded by Brian Sobel.
5 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Mayor Hilligoss
6 NOES: Nelson
7 ABSENT: None
8
9 The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session
to
11
12 ROLL CALL 7:00 p. m.
13 PRESENT: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh,
14 Mayor Hilligoss
15 ABSENT: None
16
17 INVOCATION
la
19 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
20
21 PUBLIC COMMENT
22 Jim Gallagher advised the Council that the 1992-93 City of Petaluma Assessment Roll is
23 $2,502,154,692, an increase of $216,484,224 (9.47%) over the 1991-92 Assessment
24 Roll.
25
26 Matt Maguire, 626 East "D" Street wrote a letter to the city regarding a proposed
27 Charter Amendment which he would like to discuss with the Council. Request that this
28 item be agendized in time for the voters to have a say on the November 3 Election. The
29 purpose of the amendment is to assure consistency with the cities general plan, goals and
3o policies in implementing our zoning, subdivision and other land use plans. The Charter
31 does not specify that tl~e General Plan be followed.
32
33 A motion was made that since this item came up after the agenda went out it is necessary
34 to agendize it for discussion to see if the Council would want to put it on a future agenda
35 for discussion.
36 Motion made by Michael Davis, Seconded by Brian Sobel.
37 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
38 Hilligoss
39 NOES: None
40 ABSENT: None
41
42
43 Peter Rodda, 23 Meadowglen, request Councils help to expedite the installation of a
44 traffic light at the intersection of South Petaluma Boulevard and Mountain View Avenue.
45 He also would like to compliment the city on the wastewater workshop. It was an
46 outstanding example of public input into a very important city project.
47
4s Tom Hargis, City Engineer responded to the question on the traffic signal. -The
49 installation is a requirement of the McNear Hill development. He will research and bring
so back to the Council a possible installation date.
Page 118, Vol. 27
July 6, 1992
~rz tjte• ,;e~
1 COUNCIL COMMENT
2 Mayor IIilligoss thank you to Kurt Yeiter for his letter to the editor of the Sonoma
3 County Journal refuting 1VIr. Lee`s opinion that he wrote last month blaming everything
4 on Petaluma because we have a growth control.. Kurt did a nice job of disproving that.
Michael Davis, Proposes that staff focus on just the promotional. requests for TOT funds
in light of the budget. crunch and bring back to council. Also concerned about the sky
divers who want to jump over the Petaluma Airport. John Scharer responded that he is
working with the City Attorney and FAA to determine the rules.
to
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Lynn Woolsey, July 4th fireworks was magnificent! We received a report of
vermiculture again and. I hope we are looking to see if there is some funding for a project
like this through AB93.9 or something at the state level.
Bonnie Nelson, When coming out of the plaza shopping center close. to MacDonalds
there is a large sign that states space for lease' it obstructs your view. The sign needs to
be moved back.
Bonnie also expressed her dislike of a letter to the editor written by Phil Joerger stating if
a person couldn't afford ababy-sitter perhaps they have no business being on the
Council.
MARINA REPORT
David Spilman, Finance Director went over the projections for revenue and
expenses of the Marina for the next few years.
Projected berthing charges of $128,250 for Fiscal Year 1992/93 is based on a
projected average occupancy rate of .37.5 %, increasing to 50% occupancy in
93/94., 82% 94/95, 90% in 95/96 In Fiscal Year 94/95 it is projected the first
5% increase in the lineal foot rate will occur and a 5% increase every year after
that.
Fuel sales and the sale of various supplies and other services is projected in Fiscal
Year 92/93 at approx $39,000. The fueling revenues will offset the fueling costs.
The annual interest that is currently being paid by Marina Office Park Association
is $52,500 in Fiscal Year 91/92. The payment in 92/93 is $43,800 which is based
on the Marina Office Park Association offer of prepayment of principal balance of
$152,250 on Lot 1 and to prepay four years of interest on the remaining balance
of the note secured by Lot 3 in the amount of $149,100.
As the City increases occupancy the utility usage will be increasing which is a big
factor in the expenditures. The operating income loss before the debt service
payment. is a positive number starting at $90,.000 in Fiscal Year 92/93 and
increasing to $273,000 Fiscal Year 97/98. The debt service for the state loan is a
level debt service of $245,200. That is a one time payment made every August 1.
July 6, 1992
Vol. 27, Page119
1 The first debt service was in Fiscal Year 91/92 at which time we incurred a loss of
2 $163,000 and .every year thereafter to Fiscal Year 96/97 we will be incurring lower and
3 lower losses. This is primarily due to the state of the economy and the level of
4 occupancy at the Marina.
5
6 In Fiscal Years 93/94 to 96/97 the recommendation is to obtain annual loans from the
7 Redevelopment Agency. These loans will be drawn down only when needed. If the
s revenue projections exceed what ~is being projected then the amount that will actually be
9 drawn down will be less. This projection should leave the City with a continuing balance
10 of $4,000 per year through to 9,7/98 where the occupancy levels and the fact that the
11 Marina Office Park Association interest kicks back in and will start showing surpluses.
12 At that point the loan from the Redevelopment Agency would begin to be repaid.
13
14 It was suggested by Councilman ,Sobel to borrow from the Redevelopment Agency one
15 year earlier making it Fiscal Year 92/93 instead of 93/94.
16
17 It was noted that there are sufficient revenues being generated by the private property
is within the Marina itself that would cover the cost of the Redevelopment Agency's loan.
19
20 Richard Coombs of the Marina Office Park Association stated. that the $152,000 principal
21 payment is to prepay the note on Lot 1 which the building is situated on and then to
22 prepay four years of interest taking into account the new loan balance of $373,000.
23
24 We were advised that the deficits; that had occurred through the operation of the Marina
2s was in excess of what had been projected.. Tax increment on the hotel alone is projected
26 to be $130,000 a year. Each building that is built adds approximately another $35,000.
27 The bank has advised MOPA that' if money is going to be advanced the one benefit would
28 be to put permanent financing one the first building. This is why the proposal to pay off
29 the note on Lot 1 prior to advancing interest payments.
30
31 If Council decides to advance the 'Redevelopment Agency loan a year early MOPA would
32 still be willing to bump their offer into the next year and the year after. As an
33 alternative, in lieu of paying off the loan on Lot 1, simply move that over to Lot 3 which
34 is the last part of the development phase, and then agree that next year MOPA would go
35 ahead and advance the city the interest.
36
37 Just for clarification MOPA would be proposing the note on Lot 1 be added to the note
3s on Lot 3 and remain in place for the same term.. By July 1 1993, the city would be
39 advanced the prepaid interest of $149,100.
40
41 John Scharer City Manager, made recommendations to Council with regard to staff
42 exploring the leasing of the harbor masters office for river or Marina related uses. Mr.
43 .Scharer also spoke with Boating 'and Waterway and even though given permission was
44 advised against it at this time.
45
46 Some of the options were to give ;to anyone with a new 12 month lease 1 month fee rent,
47 or a tenant who brings in a new tenant with a 12 year lease would get a reduction on their
4s rent for 1 month.
49
so Brian Sobel would like staff to spend some time on a creative marketing plan and bring
51 this back to the Council along with the figures from the Redevelopment Agency on
52 switching Lot 1 and Lot 3 security.
,:~;,..
Page 120, Vol. 27 July 6, `1`992 ~ ".
1 WASTEWATER REPORT
2 Assistant City Manager, Warren Salmons thanked. those who participated in the series of
3 wastewater workshops over the past several months.
4
5 Staff would ask that rather than commence discussion on the statements the participants
6 filled out set a date for a study session and give those who have not- returned their
7 responses extra time to do so.
s Study session date was set for July 27 at 7:00 p.m. to be held in the Council Chambers.
9
to RESO. 92-161 NCS
11 WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY CONSULTANT-DR: TCHOBANOGLOUS
12 Reso. 92-.1'.62 NCS approve entering into an extended contract with Dr. Tchobanoglous
13 for additional services, specifically working with the city to prepare request for statement
14 of qualifications, and a request for proposal package that. would be used to solicit -firms to
15 design, construct, operate and/or finance system. Introduced by Nancy Read, seconded
16 by Michael Davis
17 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
18 Hitligoss
19 NOES: None
20 ABSENT: None
21
22 RESO. 92-162 NCS
23 WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
24 Reso. 92-162 NCS authorizing. staff to commence with selection of a consulting .firm to
25 prepare environmental documentation for the Wastewater Treatment Facility. Introduced
26 by Nancy Read, seconded by Michael Davis
27 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
28 Hilligoss
29 NOES: None
30 ABSENT: None
31
32 PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT - PETALUMA VALLEI' ALLIANCE
33 A letter was received by Matt Maguire on behalf of the Petaluma Valley Alliance asking
34 Council to put a Charter Amendment on the November ballot that would_ assure
35 consistency with the General Plan and its goals and policies in implementing :zoning,
36 subdivision and other land use plans.
37
38 David Keller advised that the Council could put this on the November 3, ballot or it could
39 be done as an initiative for a Special Election in June 93 or Regular Municipal Election in
4o November 94. This proposed anaendn~ent is to bring the city into conformance with all
41 general law cities in California which do mandate that their General Plan be complied
42 with and not be exempted at various plamiing intervals.
43
44 Council questioned what this would accomplish that any future city council could not
45 bypass if they thought it was important enough to do so? It was also stated that if a city
46 council wanted to make something work irrespective of this Charter Amendment with
47 proper findings they could still do it.
48
49 Matt Maguire spokesperson for the Petaluma Valley Alliance stated that they want
so consistency in the governing documents of the city. Since 'the city Charter does not
51 .require the council to follow the General Plan then it is unenforceable. If you want to
52 protect the business district, downtown and the environment you need consistent planning
53 documents.
July 6, 1992
Vol. 27, Page121
1 To have two documents in conflict makes it difficult for a council to see what the
2 cumulative impacts of development are. If changes are to be made to the General Plan
3 council should go through the open public process. The PVA asks that council agendize
4 this issue so we can discuss the merits of putting it on the ballot to let the voters say how
5 they feel the city should operate.
6
7 Council stated that there is a process already in existence, it is called Public Hearings,
8 however it does not work for those people who become active too late in the process.
9
1o Council suggested a study session to go over the pros and cons, give examples of what it
11 is the Alliance thinks is getting in the way of General Plan support, and work it out as
12 was done with the sewer workshops.
13
14 Matt Maguire believes council can put this issue on the ballot between now and
15 November 3.
16
17 David Keller: Council might want to ask the City Attorney why at times and on several
18 recent decisions he has offered in defense of city actions that the council was not
19 obligated to comply with the General Plan because it was a Charter City.
20
21 Rich Rudnansky, City Attorney, stated that he did not .use that language, but that
22 generally there is authority in the law that Charter cities are not required to have
23 consistency between their Zoning and General Plan.
24
25 Michael Davis made a motion not to endorse this, I do not know if this could at all
26 jeopardize the city's litigation, this discussion has already gone around that several times
27 this evening. I feel very uncomfortable with that. I do see it as duplication. I do not see
2s that city col~ncils are going to abuse it. Maybe the Alliance would want to go before
29 their next city council and talk to them about this. As far as I am concerned I do not
3o want to see it agendized because I do not want it to go to the ballot. You people of
31 course have the right to do it as an initiative if you choose. Seconded by Bonnie Nelson
32
33 Councilman Davis amended his motion to read: To agendize this issue after August 6,
34 pursuant to workshops and a thorough public process to work with the people on this.
35
36 Councilman Sobel asked Councilwoman Nelson to withdraw her second on Davis's first
37 motion in favor of the Councilmembers new motion. Seconded by Bonnie Nelson
38
39 ORI). 1891 1~1CS
4o GREYSTONE CREEK (GLENBROOK NORTH) SiJBDIVISIONI
41 Mike Gallagher, McBail Company objected to a number of the proposed conditions of
42 approval, those being to reduce the allotments to coincide with the development proposal,
43 density feathering and rural elements to home design.
~~
9.k '
~N
re+~t~i.. 4y~ ~1'`~ ~i'~j>Y ~f ~~ i si Yrrn~'°f' ~(,~ 1a, ~~"'{^elFt~y
Page 122, Vol. 27 July 6,1992
1 McBail Company is more than willing to leave the designation of the school site. McBail
2 Company has no intention of dedicating. the site. when-there is. no agreement to purchase
3 it at this time. They do anticipate the ite being developed in 1.996/97.
4
5 With respect to the Waugh School site McBaii Company has a Performance Agreement
6 with the district. When tlieir enrollment at the existing school on Maria Drive reaches a
7 certain point they have the right to acquire that site on Corona Road.
s
9 We object to feathering because we think it is a waste of land in this area and costly to
io the city and public. This is~ not open space unimproved land this is fully improved
11 subdivision land. There is a $3.2 million. assessment. on the .entire property. .Each time
12 you eliminate a lot your adding a horrendous amount of assessments to the remaining
13 lots. We have actually achieved the feathering that separates the urban standard land. use
14 from the rural land use.
15
16 Nelson: I think what we are saying asking is do we want more houses now or
17 later because they will build granny units on them.
is
19 Pamela Tuft, Planning Director stated it was staff's intention to give direction to
20 McBail's architect ,that we are looking for some unique element. I believe the' condition
21 reads: Project architect .shall be modified to provide these homes with some unique
22 element suggestive of the traiisifion of more rural setting such as stronger porch elements,
23 trellising and or picket or rail fencing..
24
25 Duane Bellinger (Waugh School) :read from the architects communication to the school.
26 'Department of Ed[ication standards for a site size' for 4'00-420 strident school is about
29 8.3 acres. The map showy only 6.4 acres, but with the use of the urban separator for
2s playing fields the size should be sufficient.
29
3o For the 50 or so rural students it maybe that a future board would like the' bus to have
31 access from Corona rather than driving down and into the urban and turning around.
32
33 He confirmed that the Waugh School District does have a purchase agreement with
34 McBail Company for the school site.
35
36 Maureen Lynch, representing the Petaluma School District, stated that the district is not
37 ready at this time to enter into an agreement to purchase the junior high site from 1VIcBai1,
38 however they feel very strongly that this site remain designated as such.
39
4o Nancy Chen Erickson, 389 Ely, agrees school site should stay as designated. Concerned
41 about the architectural factors m this area. Something to make it a unique community or
42 neighborhood that fits ,in with that area. She is also concerned about the traffic signals in
43 the area between Washington and Corona. She does not want. to have a lot of stops all
44 along that stretch of road. .
July 6, 1992
Vol. 27, Page123
1 (public hearing closed)
2
3 It was the consensus of the Council to keep the allotments, keep feathering (designated
4 adjacent to urban separator but not along Ely Road), reserve junior high school site, state
5 in the conditions that SPARC is to request the types of elements that would give the
6 homes that rural character and work with McBail's architect and to change the wording to
7 say 'unique element suggestive of the transition to more rural setting, such-as for
8 example stronger porch elements, trellising, and/or picket or rail fencing.'
9
to ORD. 1891 NCS
11 GREYSTONE CREEK (GLENBROOK NORTII) SUBDIVISION
12 Introduce Ordinance 1891 NCS rezoning from Planned Community Development to Planned
13 Unit District (164 detached single family dwellings, 94.8 acres, 4 acre urban high density site,
14 4.3 acre affordable manufactured housing project, 18 acres of urban separator, 14 acre junior
15 high school and 6 acre elementary school site) Feathering along the urban separator north of the
16 creek and along Ely Road north of the creek.
17 Introduced by Michael Davis, seconded by Bonnie Nelson
18 AYES: Reed, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
19 Hilligoss
20 NOES: None
21 ABSENT: None
22
23 ORD. 1892 NCS
24 GREYSTONE CREEK (GLENBROOK NORTI-n SUBDIVISION
25 Introduce Ordinance 1892 NCS amending McBail Development Agreement. Introduced
26 by Michael Davis, seconded by Brian Sobel.
27 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
28 Hilligoss
29 NOES: None
30 ABSENT: None
31
32
33 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
34 Jim McCann advised Council that meetings were held between the neighbors, United
35 Church of Christ and Mr. Lizak.. It was clear they wanted some degree of open space at
36 the church site. There was no interest in a tot lot either at tl~e Liazk property or church
37 property. Relative to Mr. Lizak's offer of $8,000 in conjunction. with his tentative map
38 approval it is my understanding that Mr. Lizak will make that contribution directly to the
39 church.
40
41 (public hearing opened)
42
43 Mr. Lizak stated that he would contribute $8,000 to the United Church of Christ for
44 proposed open space. Upon approval of the final map the $8,000 donation will be paid
45 on a pro rata basis prior to the issuance of a building permit for each house at the same
46 time as the Park and Recreation Land Improvement fees become due. In the event any of
47 the lots are sold prior to the building permit issuance, payment shall be made on a per lot
48 basis sold at that time to the United Church of Christ.
1
~ 1, ~'2 { S't ~ yc? 'R
r, .. _.
Page 124, Vol. 27 July 6, 1992
1 Planning Director, Pamela Tuft advised Council that. this could be made a condition of
2 the final map and to require recordation of an agreement between Mr. Lizak and United
3 Church of Christ concurrent with the final map. Also, offer it as a mitigation measure to
4 the General Plan Amendment.
5
6 City Attorney, Rich Rudnansky stated that it could be made a condition. of the tentative
7 map that an agreement be reached and the provision be included that 'the $$,;000 come out
8 of escrow.
9
to Max Eastman, United Church of Christ - it was concluded that a park or tot lot was not
11 of great importance to the area and that open space was more suitable for the betterment
12 of the community.
13
14 Jeanette Arcee, 73 Mission Drive, expressed good' feelings with regard to neighborhood
15 meetings and the fact that. even Councilrnember's get involved by attending. meetings held
16 in neighborhood homes. The fact that there was good open comi»unication:
17
18 Gordon Dow, 3868 Lanewood Drive, Santa Rosa, President of Dow Dermatologies &
19 Allerderm Laboratories, would like to thank the staff of the Planning Department for
20 efficiently handling matters. We are in agreement with the recommendations.
21
22 (public hearing closed)
23
24 RESO. 92-163 NC5
25 LAND USE_AMENDIVIENTS -NEGATIVE DECLARATION
26 Reso.. 92-163 NCS approving Negative Declaration with additional mitigation of the
27 agreement between Lizak and United Church of Christ and the open space easement
28 Introduced by Brian Sobel, seconded by Michael Davis
29 AYES: Davis, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavana~=h, Mayor Hilligoss
30 NOES: None
31 ABSENT: None
32 ABSTAIN: Read, Woolsey
33
34 RESO. 92-164 NCS
35 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMEiVDMENTS
36 Reso. 92-164 NCS approving General Plan Land Use Map Amendments
37 Introduced by Vice Mayor Cavanagh, seconded by Brian Sobel.
38 AYES: Davis, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor Hilligoss
39 NOES: None
40 ABSENT: None
41 ABSTAIN: Read, Woolsey
42
43 RESO. 92-165 NCS
44 DETACHMENT OF :TOSETTE CT FROM CASH DEL ORO LAD
45 Reso. 92-165 NCS detaching territory from Casa del. Oro Landscaping Assessment
46 District. Introduced by Nancy Read, seconded by Michael Davis
47 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
48 Hilligoss
49 NOES: None
50 ABSENT: None
July 6, 1992 Vol. 27, Page125
1 CORONA ELY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -AMENDMENTS
2 Jim McCann, Senior Planner addressed Council with proposals from from the six
3 developers in the Corona/Ely area who want to amend their development agreements.
4 There are 8 amendments proposed. Tl1e most significant of the amendments provides for
5 a change to the assessment district and will provide for the timely construction of Ely
6 Road. The assessment district itself will be expanded, monies will be made available to
7 allow for the construction of the road prior to the commencement of some of the
s construction of the projects such as Glenbrook North. Additionally there are provisions
9 to accelerate the payment of traffic mitigation fees and also to provide for some penalties
to to make sure those fees are in fact made available by July 15, 1994.
11
12 A significant amendment is that the tentative map terms as well and the SPARC approval
13 terms are extended to be coincident.
14
is Matt Hodson, Attorney stated tl~e schedule noted in Exhibit 3 to the amendment has been
16 changed to apply to both the payback for the benefit fee district and to the traffic
17 mitigation fees.
18
19 With regard to the Quaker Hill Development Amendment. Since the first development
20 agreement was adopted, Quaker Hill has entered into a joint venture with Ryder Homes
21 called Cader Farms Investors. Some of that property that Quaker Hill owned has been
22 conveyed, therefore making Cader Farms Investors subject to all the requirements of the
23 development agreement. The change is simply to add Cader Farms Investors as a signor
24 of the amendment so it is known they are subject to the terms.
2s
26 ORD. 1983 NCS
27 CADER FARMS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2
2s Introduce Ordinance No. 1893 NCS approving Amendment No. 2 of the Development
29 Agreement with respect to the above mentioned amendments. Introduced by Lynn
3o Woolsey, seconded by Vice Mayor Cavanagh.
31 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
32 Hilligoss
33 NOES: None
34 ABSENT: None
3s
36 ORD. 1894 NCS
37 GLENBROOI< DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2
3s Introduce Ordinance No. 1894 NCS approving Amendment No. 2 of the Development
39 Agreement with respect to the above mentioned amendments. Introduced by Lynn
4o Woolsey, seconded by Vice Mayor Cavanagh.
41 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
42 Hilligoss ~ -. _
43 NOES: None
44 ABSENT: None
4s ORD. 1895 NCS
46 GRAY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2
47 Introduce Ordinance No. 1895 NCS approving Amendment No. 2 of the Development
4s Agreement with respect to the above mentioned amendments. Introduced by Lynn
49 Woolsey, seconded by Vice Mayor Cavanagh.
50 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
51 Hilligoss
s2 NOES: None
s3 ABSENT: None
54
Page 126, Vol. 27
July 6, '1992
.r,:.
~_;a ~ tr, ;at
1 ORD. 1896 NCS
2 KINGSMILL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2
3 Introduce Ordinance No. 1896 NCS approving Amendment No. 2 of the Development
4 Agreement with respect to the above mentioned amendments. Introduced by Lynn
5 Woolsey, seconded by Vice Mayor Cavanagh.
6 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
7 Hilligoss
8 NOES: None
9 ABSENT: None
10
11 ORD. 1897 NCS
12 MOUNTAIN VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO 2
13 Introduce Ordinance No. 1897 NCS approving Amendment No. 2 of the Development
14 Agreement with respect to the above mentioned amendments. Introduced by Lynn
15 Woolsey, seconded by Vice Mayor Cavanagh.
16 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
17 Hilligoss
18 NOES: None
19 ABSENT: None
20
21 ORD. 1898 NCS
22 SONOMA GLEN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO 2
23 Introduce Ordinance No. 1898 NCS approving Amendment No. 2 of the Development
24 Agreement with respect to the above mentioned amendments. Introduced by Lynn
25 Woolsey, seconded by Vice Mayor Cavanagh.
26 AYES: Read, Davis, Woolsey, Sobel, Nelson, Vice Mayor Cavanagh, Mayor
27 Hilligoss
28 NOES: None
29 ABSENT: None
30
31
32 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (hearing opened-contim~ed to Iuly 20)
33
34 VICE MAYOR CAVANAGII reported that the Underground Utility District met on 18th of
35 June, with representatives of the different utility companies. Some of the priorities
36 discussed were Magnolia Avenue, Lakeville Street, Water Street, Casa Grande Road,
37 East Washington etc. I» two years it is expected that there will be about one million
38 dollars in the 20A Funds for undergrounding. Direction is needed by Council as to what
39 project it would like done.
40
41 City Engineer Tom Hargis added that the list that was developed was tentative projects.
42 The utility companies will field review the locations discussed, put preliminary cost
43 estimates with those projects and then staff would bring a report to the Council with a
44 recommendation.
45
46 Adjourn 11:02
47 . <
48
49 "
so .Patricia Hilligoss, Mayor
51 ATT
52
53
54 Pau ette Lyon, Deputy i Clerk