HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 09/03/1991September 3, 1991
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
PETALUMA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTElVIBER 3,1991
~~PrOVGO. 0.S corre:c-
9-i6-g/
Vol. 26, Page 389 ~..
3:00 P:M. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Read,, Davis, Cavanagh, Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor
Hilligoss, Sobel, Nelson
ABSENT: None
g ~ MINUTES
..
9 ~ -The minutes of the August~;19 meeting were approved as corrected: • • y "
" io Page 382, ;Line 19,."of balance" is repeated. °
11 Page 385', Line 25 should read, "..the Councilmembers present favored allowing only 2 units on : .
°- 12 "the site."
13 - CONSENT CALENDAR°
14 The following items; which .are noncontroversial and have been reviewed by the City
15 Council and staff were. enacted by one motion which was introduced by Jack Cavanagh.: , ' °.
16 and seconded by Vice Mayor. Woolsey.
17 AYES: Read, Davis, Cavanagh, Sobel, Nelson
18 Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
19 NOES: None
20 ABSENT: None
21 RESO.91-266 NCS
22 CLAIIVIS AND BILLS.
23 Resolution 91-266 NCS approving Claims and Bills #13142 through #13550.
24 * * * * * End of Consent Calendar*
25 ORD. 1867 NCS
26 AMBULANCE SERVICE "CODIFIED"
27 Adopt Ordinance 1867 NCS adding Chapter 8.30 -Municipal Ambulance Service to
2s the Petaluma Municipal Code.
29 AYES: Read, Cavanagh, Nelson
30 Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
31 NOES: None
32 ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Davis*, Sobel*
33 * -They were absent when the ordinance was introduced:
34 RES®. 91-267 NCS
35 PARK PLACE 6 & 7 EUCALYPTUS TREES
36 The Council considered a request from the Homeowners Association of Park Place 6
37 & 7 Subdivision for accelerated eucalyptus tree removal. Several years ago,
3s permission was granted to remove the grove of eucalyptus trees over an extended
39 number of years. A tree, replacement program was to have been instituted. Since that
40 time, the trees were severely topped.
Page 390, Vol. 26
September 3, 1991
1 PARK PLACE 6 & 7 EUCALYPTUS TREES contd.
2 The long.. term freezing temperatures last Winter caused damage- to the grove.
3 According to Helen Loorya, property manager fgr the Park Placd. b and 7
4 Homeowners Association, the Board of Directors has directed her to' represent them
5 at the City Council meeting.
6 She advised~:they have ,.replaced one eucalyptus with three, trees. 'The Council. wanted
7 assurance that- the tree species they select are among. the trees the Parks and
s Recreation. Director would approve for low maintenance rec~uiremenfs and minimal
~ ground intrusion problems.. The Council also asked for written assurance that, the
to Board. of Directors of the Homeowners Association. did take action to request the
ll. accelerated tree. removal. Resolution 91-267 NCS authorizing accelerated removal of
12 the eucalyptus tree. grove in Park Place 6 and 7. Introduced .bye Br-ian Sobel and
13 seconded by Michael- Davis. ~ ~ ~ . ; ,
14 ..AYES: Read, Davis, Cavanagh; Soliel;'Nel'son ~ :, ,
15 Vice Mayor Woolsey, :Mayor Hilligoss ~ ~ ~ -
16 NOES: None
17 ~ ~ ABSENT: .None ~.'.
18- ~ SANTA ROSA EAST/WEST'TRAFFIC REROUTE TIIROUGII PETAIUNIA ~~
19 CALTRANS requested .City Council input on the City of Sonoma ,proposal to change
20 the Santa. Rosa to US 80 east-west traffic pattern away from Highway 12 through tfie~:
21 City of Sonoma and onto US 101 to State .Route 116 through the City of Petaluma.
22 Currently there are mayor d.el'ays due to the heavy traffic load on -the northbound LJS'
23 10.1 off-ramp, connection. with eastbound State Route 116, Lakeville Highway.
2a CALTRANS has not committed any funds to the project.
25 The City and CALTRANS have not been able to reach concurrence on the
26 sgnalizaton of that intersection nor on_any cost ,haring of the needed- traffic. lane
27 expansion along that stretch of State Route 1,16. The.:Council expressed (heir concern
28 that a major rerouting of traffic such as this would. negatively impact the City°funded
29 State Route .1.16 (Lakeville Highway) widening project within the City` of Petaluma,
3o because the additional traffic volume this proposal would generate. could overload: the
31 engineered' capacity.
32 It was noted that the professional drivers have continuously expressed their, concerns
33 about the dangers at the I7S Highway 101 northbound off-ramp to Lakeville Highway.
34 The Council .asked the City Manager to correspond with CAL,TRANS arid.. our State
35 Legislators outlining the 'Council's concerns.-
36 REGIONAL GOVERNMENT
37 The Council's response to the .Letter from Mayor Valerie Brown, City of. Sonoma,
38 regarding. the. Bay Vision ZQ20 -draft report on establishing another 1'evel of
39 government which would be an. umbrella over municipalities and counties'in the area.
ao The `Petaluma City Council feels that maintenance of local control over land use
41 decisions is ,of paramount importance. Local jurisdictions should increasingly- join
42 together to manage matters: of joint. concern and/or :interest..' -Air quality,.-water
43 supply, waste management and transportation systems are examples of topics over
~~ which cooperative, regional management makes sense.
September 3, 1991 Vol. 26, Page 3'91
REGIONAL GOVERNMENT contd.
2 The Council also..expressed their strong feeling, that. any regional governing boards
3 should be composed of elected officials, because they are answerable to the public.
4 The imposition of regional government over areas ~ which have dissimilar
5 socioeconomic bases. is to be avoided. The Mayor was directed. to advised the Sonoma
6 County Mayors and Councilmembers of the Petaluma position.
ORD. 1865 NCS
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - .DWELLING GROUPS
9 Adopt Ordinance 1865 NCS amending Zoning Ordinance 1072 NCS Dwelling
10 Groups.
11 AYES: Read, Cavanagh, Nelson, Vice, Mayor Woolsey,
12 NOES: Mayor Hilligoss
13 ABSENT:' None ABSTAIN: Davis*, Sobel*
14 * - Theywere absent when the ordinance was introduced.
15 ORD. 1868 NCS
16 REZONE: BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB LANDS -EIGHTH STREET
17 Before there was discussion on the adoption of Ordinance 1868 NCS to uphold appeal
18 and rezone the Boys and Girls Club excess lands at their 8th Street location,
19 Councilman Cavanagh moved to reconsider the ordinance and Councilwoman Nelson
20 moved to reconsider .the Resolution 91-259 NCS approving a General Plan change.
21 The Deputy City Attorney advised that there, was no requirement to second either
22 motion. Pursuant to the City Council Rules and Regulations, the completion of these
23 actions cannot occur until the next succeeding or regular meeting.
24 OItD. 1869 NCS ,
25 AMEND_ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT -DECKS
2b Introduce Ordinance 1869 NCS amending Deck setbacks and amending PUD/PCD
27 application requirements. Councilman Cavanagh left the meeting at 4:15 p.m. It was
28 agreed the patio overhang,_should be the same as is the case-in the R1-6,500 zoning
29 district. The ordinance was introduced by Nancy Read and seconded by Michael
30 Davis.
31 AYES: Read, Davis, Sobel, Nelson
32 Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
33 NOES: None
34 ABSENT: Cavanagh
35 RESO.91-268 NCS
36 STORM DRAIN, PAYBACK-AGREEMENT - WILSONJLAKEVILLE
37 HOOTS ELECTRIC - SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCX
3s Resolution 9126.8 NCS authorizing the City to enter into an agreement with the
39 Sonoma County Water Agency for reimbursement of costs incurred by Hoots Electric
40 for installation of a storm drain at the new building on Lakeville and Wilson Streets.
41 Hoots Electric installed a storm drain through their site to a connection with the
42 Sonoma County Water Agency storm drain.
• ~ '; ~,~_
Page 392, Vol. 26 September 3, 1991
1 HOOTS - STORM DRAIN PAXRACK.cont'd.
2 The `total reimbursement amount, agreed to by Hoots Electric arid. the: Sonoma. County
3 Water Agency was $81,285.17. Introduced by Michael. Davis,. econded by Brian
4 Sobel.
5 AYES: Read; Davis,. Sobel; Nelson
6 Vice Mayor Woolsey;.Mayor Hilligoss
7 NOES:. None
8 ABSENT: Cavanagh
~ RESO., 9,1-269 'NCS
to SONOlVIA GLEN'LANDSCAPE ASSESSIVIENT DISTRICT (L.A:D.~
11 Resolution 91-269 NCS initiating proceedings 'for the Sonoma; Glen Landscape
12 Assessment District (L.A.D.) which is. located in'the Corona-Ely area. Introduced. by
13 Brian Sobel,.'seconded by Vice Mayor Woolsey.:
14 AYES: Read, Davis, Sobel,'Nelson
15 ~ Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
16 NOES: None
17 ABSENT: Cavanagh
18 R SO.9.1-2,70 NCS
19 SONOMA GLEN LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (L.A.DJ
20 Resolution 91-270 NCS .approving; an engineering services agreement with Nyst"rom
._ , .
21 Engineering in connection with the Sonoma Glen Landscape Assessment .District
22 (L.A.D) which is located in' the Corona-Ely area. Introduced by -Brian. Sobel,
23 seconded by Vice Mayor Woolsey.
24 AYES:: Read, Davis, Sobel, Nelson
25 Vice Mayor Woolsey; Mayor Hilligoss
26 NOES: None
27 ABSENT: Cavanagh
28 RESO: 91-27i NCS
29 SONOMA GLEN LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 'DISTRICT (L.A.D:~
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Resolution 91-271 NCS approving a legal services agreement with Sturgis, Ness,
Brunsell & Sperry for the Sonoma Glen Landscape Assessment 'District ~ (L.A.D,)
which. is located in the Corona=Ely area. Introduced by Brian .Sobel, seconded by Vice
Mayor Woolsey.
AYES: Read, Davis, Sobel, Nelson.
Vice Mayor Woolsey; Mayor Hilligoss
NOES'. None
ABSENT: Cavanagh
r ;~
September 3; 1991
Vol. 26, Page. 393
1 ItESO.91-272 NCS
2 SONOMA GLEN LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (L.A.D.Z
3 Resolution 91,-272 NCS ordering improvements in the Sonoma Glen Landscape
4 Assessment District (L.A.D.) which is located in the Corona-Ely .area. Introduced by
5 Brian Sobel, seconded by Vice Mayor Woolsey.
6 AYES: Read; Davis, Sobel, Nelson
7 Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
8 NOES: None
9 ABSENT: Cavanagh
1o RES®. 91-273 NCS
11 SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE TRAFFIC SIGNAL: RADIO EQUIPMENT
12 Resolution 91-273 NCS authorizing expenditure of $14,500 for a sole source purchase
13 of microwave band radio traffic signal communication equipment for the signal
14 coordination on the McDowell Boulevard corridor. The sole distributor is General
15 Devices and Instruments, Inc., of Sunnyvale. Introduced by Michael Davis, seconded
16 by Nancy Read.
17 AYES: Read, Davis, Sobel,, Nelson
18 Vice-Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
19 NOES: None
20 ABSENT: Cavanagh
21 RESO.91-274 NCS
22 AIP-09 GRANT ACCEPTANCE
23 Resolution 91-274 NCS accepting. a grant offer of $468,0000 from the Federal
24 Aviation Administration for AIP Project No. 3-06-0186-09 for the west collector
25 taxiway including marking and drainage; automatic drive gate; construction of a
26 collector taxiway and T-hangar taxilanes including marking and drainage; construction
27 of .airport drainage 'improvements; and installation of fencing including gates. This is
28 Contract #DTFA08-91-C-30493. Introduced by Brian Sobel, seconded by Vice Mayor
29 Woolsey.
30 AYES: Read, Davis; Sobel, Nelson
31 Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
32 NOES: None
33 ABSENT: Cavanagh
34 AD TOURN
35 At 4:50 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to 7:00 p.m.
36 ~ 7:00 p.m. RECONVENE
37 PRESENT::Read,,Davis; Sobel, Nelson '
38 Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
39. ,, ABSENT: Cavanagh
40
41
PUBLIC COMMENT
42 ° Mayor Hilligoss announced that anyone wishing to .speak on the Wastewater item
43 should. do so at the Publi¢ Comment time on the agenda. After the Wastewater
44 presentation, any unanswered questions the public still has should be directed to the
45 City in writing. The City will respond to the questions in writing. This is not a public
46 hearing.
Allan Tilton led the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
>pM. ;~~,
Page 394, Vol. 26
September 3, 1991
{n~ .: Pt
1 David Keller, representing the. Petaluma River Council, P. O. Box 750501, 'Retaluma
2 94975.. He~'is: eoncerned this is not an open, public discussion. That we have to make
a seems kinda bac or questioning prior to any presentation by EOS or by Ned Orett; it
3 our presentation kwards. He read from a position. paper that the Petaluma: River
5 Councils., Sierra. Club,. and Friends of Petaluma wrote and submitted `to the City;iri June
6 on improving ,the decision-making process. "The EIR process does not deal very well
7 with conflicting testimony leaving the ,lead agency to resolve discrepancies, in this case
8 the City Council and Planning, Commission.- The use of -neutral third: party mediators
9 and 'trained team leaders woul'd' help develop .mutual trust, .openness and creativity
io necessary to solve difficult problems.. I refer 'you to 'a book' from the .Conservation
11 Foundation. called,.Resolving Environmental Disputes, by Gayle Bingham.
12 Carol Grew,. 25 Magnolia -what do I and other concerned people i .Pet"aluma need to
i3 do to get the City to .stop before it's too, late and re-evaluate the planned sewage
14 treatment project: City members have claimed that privatizing our sewage treatment
15 will save money. The Cityis beingaured into a trap.
16 This will cost us more'in'the long run.. We-will pay off the costs and put some proft;in
17 their pockets. We deserve opportunities for two-way conversations with City 1'eaders.
18 to discuss our concerns, objections and suggestions. It is essential to democracy and- a
19 healthy city that lines of communication between people and the elected
20 representatives are open.
21 °Connie 'Petty; 718 F :Street -requests the City meet with the citizens of Petaluma for
22 an open .dialogue regarding the wastewater treatment plant. The ;constraint of this
23 particular forum, a portion of 15' minutes for public comment, does not allow for -the
2a dialogue necessary when _deal'ing with. an issue of uch importance. She read
25 Government`. Code. Section 54253 regarding privatization. 'She also read from an
26 environment 1 er ors. 1991, Wall Street Journal relating. to Waste, Management, Inc:,
28 Steven Long, 308 Pleasant ,Avenue. -supports expansion- of the treatment;; plant to
29 accommodate ourgrowing community. Perhaps in the interest of fiscal responsibility,
3o you should consider having this $20 Million project go to competitive bid.
31 Mark' Medeiros; 200. Jesse Lane (outside City) -moved here from San Jose. Doesn't
32 want Petaluma. to be like -San Jose.
33 CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
3a,, 1Vlichael Davis - is an advocate of collaborative decision;making, There is a set.
35 ,protocol in this tyke of decision, which works. Cited a $16 Million :Sonoma Mountain
36 Parkway; $3 Million McDowell. Blvd.,. $2.S Million Comiriunity Centel, $2° Million '
37 .Police Station„ $4.1Vlillon Lakeville .Assessment- District, and the water :expansion all
38 have gone through the protocol. that we have available to us. It'works. ~ T.believe"we- '
39 " will offer all the time you people ~ deserve.. as citizens of .Petaluma. within that
ao framework.. We will have ample public comment opportunity 'as" this project,.
al ~ progresses.
a2 Vice Mayor Woolsey -Regarding the fuchsia pink sign advertising an automobi e
a3 dealer. She asked if it was legal, if the City has° any say over what the billboard. is like.
as It is bad. It's ugly.
September 3, 1991
Vol,, 26, Page 395
1 Bonnie Nelson -Regarding the eleven year old's letter regarding .Bay Vision 2020;. it is
2 good that other people are noticing the movement towards regional government.
3 Pretty soon, with. any luck, the homeless will be moving into the Armory.
4 That is a kind. of warehousing..of alot of different .problems, and, hopefully, we can
5 work toward a long term solution. We always rely on the. good graces of our
6 Governor.. I would hope people from our commuiuty and from the churches give us
7 .some input on the situation. ~ ~.
8 1VIEDIAN BARRIER - N. MC DOWELL BLVD. AT LAUREN DR.
9 Traffic Engineer A11an.~ Tilton discussed, several proposals to =construct a barrier
10 .median °to. prevent illegal. left `turns .into the g .McDonalds Restaurant area in the Plaza
11 ~ Shopping Center:..He showed the collision history of th'e stretch of North McDowell
12 between East Washington and East Madison. The Council directed staff to prepare
13 plans for a thin barrier ,median on North 1VIcDow.e11 Blvd. which would extend from
14 East Washington - fto = a point just: beyond Lauren Drive to block cross traffic
15 movements. The Council recommendation will be -referred'to the Traffic Commission
16 for notice and hear"ng.
17 ~ ~ ~ WAS~`EWA`TEIt' TREATMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT
1s City Manager John Scharer ngted~ that.' whether it is a publicly owned and publicly
19 operated, or a publicplant that 'is privately ~ operated; or whether it is a private plant
20 that is privately operated, there are several things we have to do:
21 1. We have to determine the capacity that we want this plant to have.
22 2. We must determine: where we want the plant to be located.
23 3. We have to decide on the most efficient treatment process given the demands
24 from our Regional Water. Quality Control' -Board and given our wastewater
25 irrigation contracts: We are now irrigating up over 700 acres. We started off
26 with 500 acres.. We'have .more demand for reclaimed water than we produce.
27 4. We have an environmentalimpact report that must be done. I think this is an
28 opportunity through- this environmental impact report to truly look at
29 alternatives.
3o If we choose to continue as we are now, publicly owned and privately operated,
31 we still must :do a service agreement for some period. of time, ten years, fifteen
32 years, twenty years. And, all of this is most likely going to be addressed
33 somehow through the environmental impact report.
34 In 1979 the City Council, after many problems with the wastewater treatment
35 plant, opted to privatize the operations. The Council was very concerned about
36 controlling the rates they. charge to the public.. We ..have had a contract now for
37 nearly 13 years. and the cost containment provision in that contract has worked.
38 Presentation by Envrotech Operating Services. Denis Dandeneau of EOS presented
39 an overview. He noted the effective lifetime of the .existing plant is nearing its end.
4o The preliminary treatment process design would utilize oxidation ,pond number 4.
41 There would be three separated circulating "lanes" of effluentmixed with bacteria,
42 along with 2 clarifiers. and space for an aerobic digester to be constructed in the
43 future: Effluent would be pumped to an aerated lagoon for final processing. A
44 building for laboratory equipment would also be included.
45 As part of the process, it was necessary. to apply to the State Public Utilities
46 Commission. for an exemption from their jurisdiction. The application was submitted
47 on August 2, .1991. The anticipated exemption notification is expected in October or
48 November of this year.
Page 396, Vol. 26 September 3, 1991
i Thee Environmental Impact Report: is tentatively scheduled for completion in the
2 Spring of 1992. In response to 'questions about marsh treatment, he~ noted that~'there
3 have been no large: scale marsh treatment- projects: The .Regional Water Quality
4 Control Board will.. have the ultimate decision to approve ~ the -method. of treatment.
5 He noted their firm. has received National -and State awards' of excelrence for their
6 operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment facilities.
7 There was a question :regarding the. link. between :EbS. and the conglomerate, Waste
s Manggement: E'OS was ;purchased by Wheelabrator ~ Technologies, Inc., during the
~ period. when there were many corporate ake-,overs, in the United Statesirin 1988,,.
1o Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc., is ,partly 'owned by Waste Management, Inc.
_ ;_ _
it (approximately 53%:). °T'heir other affiliated corporations are 'in related activities such
12 as compost systems "for municipal' sludge and solid waste; sludge, compost.'rnarketing
13 firm, drying/pelletizing:and stabilizing sludge for commercial fertilizing..
P-
15 controlingeenti Co He l oted thel beDnefitd to ePUC~exenhtion s toe City Yas' 'the: r-ate
. be reinoved~ from.
P
16 their urisdiction. Re ardin burldin a treatment lant "`
j g g g. p m modules; he.noted the costs
17 would be higher due to disruption of existing process and due to inflation.
is Presentation. by Ned Qrett, Pacific Techiology~Associates.,-~ Mr, Orett suggested that
1~ the City could reduce. thewater usa~e~~and tlierefore;delay the requirement of building
Zo anew plant. He suggested retrofitting the town with low-flow toilets, lqw flow shower
21 heads and faucet aerators. He observed there has been. very little, incentive for'
22 conservation. in the `wastewater industry,. because: the government. was always there
23 with money,for wastewater plant improvements. This source of .funding- has. gone..
24 I=Ie cited information. from a book on wetlands, .treatment and noted 'this has. been
25 accomplished successfully.. He. suggested that an ad hoc commissionbe established to
26 work with the'City in connection. with the development of~ a new wastewater. treatment
27 facility. With these suggestions, he noted, the City can. buy `time o develop a
2s wastewater treatment facility that is on the leading edge of technology.
29 Earlier in the ,evening,. the Council had asked members of the audience to submit and .
3o unanswered questions to the City. The Council repeated that.. request. Some Council
3i comments. included:
32 - We still possibly need a treatment plant:.
33 - Don't think°we: need a commission:
34 - We need capacity to treat'storm water:
35 - `There are questions we need to formulate to flesh out additional answers.
36 - We need. to get. different groups from the community to give input on. this.
37 - We need to ' _ d examples that work to be sure they are easible. .
3s - 'The real cost of putting. the pain. off until later, as opposed to taking ~e
39 pain now needs to' be looked at.
ao We may be able. to buy ten, years, but in real dollars. isthat ~ buying a.
41 problem.
42 - Want to talk about bringing in. an expert.
43 ORD. 18,70 NCS
~ TOBACCOVENDING.IVIACI~IINE ~G~ULATIONS
45 Introduce Ordinance 1'870 NCS prohibiting. the sale of tobacco: `products through
46 certain vending machines. Regarding .the machines that;' have locking. devices
47 connected to'a remote control panel which is confrolled by an~'indivdual.
- ~ September 3, .1991
Vol. 26, Page 397
ORD. 1870 NCS -TOBACCO VENDING MACHINES contd.
2. ~ The Council agreed to include the words, "including remote. control locking device".
3 Introduced by Lynn Woolsey, seconded by Michael Davis.
4 AYES: Read, Davis, Sobel, Nelson
5 Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
6 NOES: None
7 ABSENT: Cavanagh
8 The Council asked staff to report problems that may be encountered in connection
9 with under age individuals purchasing cigarettes in bar vending machines. The Police
1o Chief will report if there is a problem. ,
11 RESO.91-275 NCS
12 WATER POI.I..UTION CONTROL. ENFORCEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
13 Resolution 91-275 NCS adopting the Water Pollution Control Enforcement
14 Management Program. This is an enforcement response plan to deal with industrial
15 waste dischargers to the_ water pollution control. plant who are not complying with our
16 local ordinance. This is an Environmental Protection Agency mandate. Petaluma is
17 one of the first jurisdictions to have this program adopted. Introduced by Lynn
1s Woolsey, seconded by Bonnie Nelson.
19 AYES: Read, Davis, Sobel, Nelson
20 Vice Mayor Woolsey, Mayor Hilligoss
21 NOES: None
22 ABSENT: Cavanagh
23 ADJOURN
24 At 10:55 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to September .
'.
~~
25 - M. Patricia Hilligoss, Mayor
26 ATTEST:
-.
27 Patricia E. Bernard, City Clerk