Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/22/1989~ pPro vefl 4S cgr~rec~ed. 6-5-g9 1vlay 22, 1989 Vo1.25, Page 65 - ~: 1VIINiJTES OF A IZEGZ7I~ ~JOLJIZNEI)1VIEETING -"' :~ PETALLTMA CI~'I' .CO~JNC~II, ~ " ~ - ~ ~ . 1VIONI)AY,IVIAY 22, 1989 ROLL .CALL.: ~ . ~ . . P~SENT Tencer, Sobel,. Woolsey, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis Mayor Hilligoss ~ ' ~ ~ - ABSENT: Cavanagh ' P~I.IC COMMENT: None COUNCIL COMMENT: Michael Davis wanted to schedule discussion on the factory built . (modular) subdivison as early as possible 1VIINiJTES The May 15, 1989, minutes were amended as follows: Page 56, Councilman Tencer was not marked absent for roll call and under Consent Calendar Councilman Tencer is marked as voting and absent. Page 59, Brian Sobel wanted to clarify that it was Council ,.consensus that Chief Krout put together a list of people that live in'our community from other jurisdictions. He was advised that it was being done. CONSENT CALENI)A1Z IZESO.89-144'NCS FINALIZING .AUTO CENTER PUID Resolution 89-144 NCS adopting. certain sign -and landscaping standards as part of the. Petaluma Auto Center PCD Development Plan. Introduced by Brian Sobel, seconded by John Balshaw AYES: Sobel, Woolsey, Balshaw,, Vice Mayor Davis NOES: None ABSENT: Cavanagh ABSTAIN: *'Tencer, Mayor Hilligoss *Councilman Tencer was not present when this item was discussed at the May 15, 1989 meeting. 1tES0.89-145 NCS FORWAItI) ADI)T'L INFOIZIVIATION ON WESTItIIDGE 4 & 5 TO LAFCO Resolution 89-14S NCS providing additional information of an alternative site analysis and supporting data to I,AFCO for the purpose of using as a possible addendum to the Westridge 4 and 5 Subdivision EIR which the City Council adopted by on December 12, 1988. Under the CEQA laws LAFCO, acting as a responsible agency, can add material to the EIR that the City of Petaluma certified. Introduced by Vice Mayor Davis, seconded by Larry. Tencer AYES: Tencer; Sobel, Woolsey, BalsiZaw, Vice IVlayor Davis, Mayor Hlligoss NOES: None ABSENT: Cavanagh ********* Page 66, Vol. 25 May 22, .1989 MEDIAN TREA~'MENT ON EEY SO. Principal Planner Pamela Tuft-presented the Council with a tentative resolution approving, median~tzeatment on Ely Blvd So. between;Casa Grande Road and Frates Road. ; Thiswas continued.fromahe May 15,.1989, Council meeting'at lvhich time Council :directed staff to `brin this matter back with a compromise. The proposed configuration is: 1500 linear eet of landscape m ' _ ~, edian, 16 on-street arkin~ spaces ~off- setfrom the -right hand travel lane, two travel lanes. are retained in ach, direction, a 'left turn-pocket southbound'at Frates Road and: aleft-turn pocket northbound at Casa Grande Road. 'There will also bea'"left-turn pocket at the main entrance into the golf course and into. Lakeville S ware apartments, and bike paths on the west side of Ely Road as a combined pedestrian~bikepath system separated from the°roadway. ' It was, noted the trees that ;are to be lanted in-the median will, grow to a substantial. size. y The resolution was introduced by John Balshaw, econded~by-Vice Mayor Davi"s ,AYES; ~Tencer, Sobel; Woolsey, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis,. Mayor Hillgoss NOES:None ABSENT; ,Cavanagh: 89-1471VGS Reso. 89-147 NCS approving.gra Country .Club Unit. 1. Introduce AYES: Tencer, Sobel, Woolsey, Mayor Hillgoss NOES: None . ABSENT: Cavanagh to final -map for Adobe Creek. Golf and Woolsey, seconded by John Balshaw `Vice Mayor Davis, RESO.89-148 NCS 1990 ALLOTMENTS Reso. 89-148NCS rescinding and reconsidering allotment decision of April 17:, 1989' and granting allotments for 1-990. On April 17, 1-989, sstaff brought before the Council recommendations for ;the distribution of 1990 allotments under the Growth Management. system. At that time the council took an action which granted a total of 671. allotments to the following projects: °Corona/Ely 300 Adobe Creek 146 Projects, of.,Pess~ than 5 acres or less .than 1S'units 45 ;Meadow :Park 19 Westridge 71 Bodega Vista 17. Country Club-,3 - 73 TOTAL; 671 1Vlay 22,1989 Vol. 25, Page 67 This total of 671 did not.include allotments. for Park Place 5 (Young America) and Fairway Meadows (Duffel Financial Company. Following the Council's decision on April 17th, letters were received from Young America Homes and Duffel Company 'asking the Council to reconsider its decision on the 1990 allotments. Information was . ~ - • .received' from Young America Homes, Duffel Company and McBail Company which provided the Council with some alternatives to the distribution of 199U' allotments. Park Place - The letter from Young America Homes ,states their intention to develop a project~of 84 - .: s_in~le family units on their 14.8 acre property bounded by Maria, Rainier,. and' Acadia Drive; that would equate to a.project of approximately 5.6 dwelling units to the acre. r Adobe Creek :The~letfer `from Duffel Company set out their construction schedule for`the Adobe Creek Golf Course project stating that for this year and next year they foresee usirig;only• 220 of the 3QO allotments that would have been granted them under the terms of the -- . - Development Agreement: Because of that, Duffel Company asked that 80 of those allotments b;e .made available to the Council for redistribution as they see fit. Meadow Park The letter from McBail Company found they had. miscalculated their need for allotments for the 1VI'eadow Park-project and they have asked that the 19 allotments that had been originally, granted to them for 1990 be withdrawn and that those allotments become available for redistribution. Net Result As a result that gives the Council. a total of 99 allotments which it may choose to redistribute to the projects that did not receive allotments under the first action of April 1'7, 1989. The Council had concerns about the future years' allotments i.e., the commitment to the Adobe Creek Golf Course and the Corona Ely area. Mike Moore presented a copy of an agreement to the Council relating four property owners in the Corona/Ely area. This agreement shows how`they propose to divide the 300 allotments among themselves over a period of time, and it contains abreak-down of the time periods for each of the developments, and number of allotments they anticipate receiving in those years. Those numbers will be formalized through a Development Agreement process that will be coming before the Council within the next few months. Should. the Council grant b71 allotments this year it will leave the council with the availability. of 500 allotments in 199.1. Three hundred (300) being committed to Corona Ely, an.additional 100 to Adobe Creek, 45 for the in-fill projects, leaving the Council with a discretionary allotment of 55 for°next year. Page 68, Vol. 25 May 22, 1989 Because of the-1500. allotment limit over 3 -years; there is some constraint 'in granting. allotments .for the year 1991, but atthispoint the major projects will be able to.receive' the allotments they need` to proceed. ' Staff intends to come back. to ~ Council with some adjustmengt s to the Growth Management Ordinance to provide the Council with better footm to make what may be difficult allotment decisions for 1991. ,{_ -Staff recommended~50 allotments for Fairway Meadows and 49 allotments to'~Park Place • ~ g ~. .~ 5 (single family)., That: would leave Park Place 5 needm 35 allotments,,. in° 1991. Princippal Planner Mike Moore .:advised the Council it was never the intent to have 500 units, finaled m any particular year;. although it could happen. It was suggested that a cafe- guard be built :into the Development Agreement pertaining to furl build out. 4 The Council agreed there is no intent to allow' the construction ~of 400 units'. in .one particular year m the Ely Corona area: The resolution contains a contingency on the. 300 allotments to the Corona Ely area .requiring formation. of an, Assessment District; and approval of the Development- Agreements or the annual 300 allotments will go back into the allotment pool. City Manager John Scharer suggested that Park. Place 5 allotments. be single family dwellings to match the existing neighborhood, not to exceed '84 unts.._+ w as ~~ ea.Y -~-~o-~ Gt mA.Xtmu.~rv~ ~ $~ u.ni'1.5 W4S rwi' oa-PprovG~, Reso: 89-148 NCS rescinding. and reconsidering allotment decision of April 17, 1989, and granting. allotments for 19.90 1990 Allotments Projects of less than.,5 acres or less than 15 units 45 Adobe Creek 66 Corona/Ely Area 3.00 Westrdge 71 Bodega Vista South 17 Country Club 3 73. Fairway Meadows 50 Park Place 5 49 Total Granted Introduced byJohn Balshaw,~seconded by Brian Sobel AYES: Tencer, Sobel, Woolsey, Balshaw, Vice Mayor Davis, Mayor Hilligo s NOES: None ABSENT: Cavanagh 1VIay 22;1989 Vol. 25, Page 69 GENE1tAL PLAN AMENI3MENT ~'®It MEB'CALF AT'ENI) OF PAULA LANE This item to be brought back to Council on June 5, 1989 at the request of Councilman Tencer. HIGHWAY'101 CQRRIDOR - SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMi1'I'EE A letter from Jim Harberson, Sonoma County Supervisor, was presented regarding the NWP right-of=way acquisition. At the request of the representative of Sonoma County, the discussion. was postponedfrom last months meeting to give the Sonona County Transportation Committee our Sales Tax group an opportunity to poll the various cities and come back with acounty-wide recommendation. There have been several communities that have expressed a position with regard to how the money from a 1/2 Cent Sales Tax or One Cent Sales Tax should. be used. The Transportation Committee has asked each Council to come bask with a proposal disposition of the funds. Their recommendation is to do highway projects to the extent of 79% of the dollars allocated by the one cent Sales Tax, and the balance of 21% five (5%) for the acquisition of the NWP-right-of-way, two (2%) for bikeways, three (3%) for transit and eleven (11%) for local agencies. Based on ,the poll results, Supervisor Harberson and the Executive Committee now believe Ghat more funding should be earmarked for the NWP right-of- way the measure to be acceptable to the majority of tfie County voters. Councilman Tencer expressed concern that there~will be sufficient monies generated for needed roadway improvements, maintenance and expansion to cope with the growing population and growing°number of vehicles; therefote there is a need for the Sales Tax Revenue :to be used for infrastructure up keep as well as the major highway improvements. The consultants are estimating costs somewhere in the vicinity of $190 million forHighway~l2 both East and West of 101. Highway 416 pro ects would be another $30 million, adding up to $640 million out of an anticipated 800 million from additional Sales Tax. Councilman Tencer and Sobel would like the Councils input on project prioritizing. Councilman. Sobel stated that the Executive Committee is asking each of the Council's to consider a package that includes more money-for the NWP right-of-way acquisition 'arid the prohibition of Sales Tax money use on freeways and overpasses in excess. of 6 lanes,: Councilman Sobel would also like to know if'Council has any specific feelings about reducing the local allocation in favor of more `money going towards- the NWP right-of-way acquisition. Councilman Tencer advised if you fund more than the railroad acquisition, you cannot afford to do all the highway projects; light rail to Santa Rosa from the county line north is estimated to cost somewhere between $180 million to $210 million. It was noted there is a groin headed by Supervisor Roumigiure that is negotiating with the Denver Rio Grande Rail Road for acquisition for the NWP right-of-way from Healdsburg to the County line as well as the portion from Willits m the North over to Shelville in the East. Page 70, Vol. 25 May 22, 1989 Cal Trans' ultimate-'design for Highway 101 is eight (8) through lanes from Marie County north, Aso the structures we are planning to modify with Sales Tax money are the projects. the State would.normally have to participate in the future. Councilman Sobel read a memo from Supervisor Janet Nicholas .regarding Spring Lake add the followin lan a e: "Thating us to add the. following languag"e or our Council. to crossing m Sant gRosgau ~ e is o revenue collected by~ths tax :may be used to fund directly or indirectly any project which would alter impair or restrict the publics use and benefit of Spring Lake Park'. . Councilman Sobel to .ask for clarification of the larigua.ge. Recess from 8:4'5 ~to 9:00-p.m, CAPITAL IIVIPROVEIVIEN`I' ~BUI)GET . Tom I-Iargis„ City`Engineer,,went over the traffic signal improvement list with the Council:. It was Council consensus qn the following; To stripe for a protected left turn pocket at 1Vlagilolia and Petaluma -Blvd N", Washingto n at. Maria;. Washington at Howard and Washington atLakeville To .approve signals at N McDowell/Community Center .and Sixth and D Streets . T-,~ ~OI,LV, c.i l~ c~„re cted ~-a~ -{o` obi v~e. 'N~+eSe. s i c~na1 P r o~cc.'F5 -1tiP ~ pr iori'E'y . The following improvements were put on hold' until developers could help with their share of cost. A: Protected left turn Petaluma Blvd @ D Street E. Signal upgrade D Street @ Sunnyslope G. SignaLPetaluina-.Blvd S. @ .Mtn. View J. Signal Petaluma. Blvd @ I Street. No left turn;from Petaluma Blvd. onto "B" Street will. be taken to the'Traffic Committee. COiJNCIL LIAISON`REPOItT " Councilman:Balshaw advised. Council that he Park and. Recreation Commission. is going to:meet with both the local Airport Commission June 1 and with the County Airport Land Use Commission on June 13th or 14th "to try'to.iron out the development of the 100 acre :park ;adjacent to the airport and;how it will relate to the auporf: We do :recommend the presentation that was made to us was by a.gentlemen who would develop 6 softball fields, battilig cages at no cost to the city, we give him th'e nand and he gets the right to, the coneession~. . He was told to"discuss it with the Planning staff and City Manager.. ~ t' ... .. 1Vlay 22,1989 Vol. 25, Page 71 There had been some discussion of the Boys and Girls Club - wanting to co-op~ with the City with regard to the community center sports facility on a tune .share basis. The Boys and Girls Club use of the facilities would be mostly daytime hours and~the City's use would be mostly evening. This wasnot presented, in detail. ' There are-grant fiinds available to the Boys :and Girls Club that can enhance our ability to receive funds.. If a time share type of arrangement could be entered into it sounds _ interesting. ADJOURNED: At 9:30 p.m the meeting was adjour d. atncia i igoss, ayo ATTEST: au ette yon, eputy ity er ,-