Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2003-230 N.C.S. 11/17/2003resolution No. 2003-230 N.C.S. of the City of Petaluma, California APPROVING AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON, LLC, FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES RELATING TO SOLICITATION AND EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS FOR SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE PROCUREMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma is engaged in a process to obtain services for solid waste, recycling and yard waste trimming collection; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has awarded a professional services agreement for oversight of the project to Hilton, Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC; and, WHEREAS, based on initial responses to the Request For Proposals, the City Council has directed staff to do additional work to Revise the Request For Proposals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Hilton, Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC, for additional services as outlined in the attached proposal for a fee not to exceed $59,918.00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the additional cost for these services are to be included in the reimbursement provisions of the Revised Request For Proposals and included in any future Franchise Agreement. Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City. REFERENCE; I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting form on the .........17.`h.......... day of ........hiauemhei :............................ 20.Q~, by the following vote: •••••••/•• ~ ••••• y •••••• Ci Attorne AYES: Canevaro, Mayor Glass, Harris, Healy, Moynihan, Vice Mayor O'Brien NOES: Torliatt ABSENT: N e ' . A ............. ...................................... ................... .. :.... .................................................... City Clerk Mayor Council File ................................... Res. Nn.........20D3.227. N.C.S. ",'V~ HILTON FP:RNKOPF Si HOBSON, LLC _ Advisory Services to =~`~ Municipal Management ?175 N. California Boulevard, Suite 990 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telepho ne: 925/977-6950 Fax: 925/977-6955 www. hf h-consultan ts. com September 30, 2003 Mr. Mike Bierman City Manager City of Petaluma 11 English Street Petaluma, California 94952 Northern California Central California Southern California Pacific Northwest Robert D. Hilton, CMC John W. Farnkopf, PE L. Scott Hobson, CPA Laith B. Ezzet, CMC Ifrse WO ~ ~iV, f... oc~ a s ~0~3 Re: Budget-Status Report,and Request for Adjustment to HF&H Professional Services Agreement for the Solid Waste Franchise Procurement Project Dear Mike: During the past few months, the City Council has redirected the solid waste franchise procurement process. Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, 'LLC (I-iF&H) has assisted the City of Petaluma.(Ci "y) in responding. to City Council concerns about the Request for Proposals for Solid Waste, Recyclable Maferals, and Yard Tr;mi,,;ng Services (RFP) and the merits of revising and reissuing the RFP. These as well as future activities were not anticipated when we entered into our Professional Services Agreement with the City. In this letter, we provide the following: ® Status on project work°to. date, o Summary of extra work performed related to reissuing the RFP, ® Future projectwork, and ® Request.for budget adjustment. Status of ~roiect Work We have completed Tasks 1 through 7, and Tasks 12 through 14 on schedule and within budget. We performed a significant portion of Task 8, which included the evaluation of North Bay's and Waste Management's April 30, 2003 proposals; presenting our evaluation findings to you on June 5; and attending' the July 7, 2003 City Council. meeting. to hear proposers' presentations and ,respond to Council questions. On the following. page, we have summarized the status of each task based on our original project scope of work. TASK DESCRIPTION STATUS 1 Initial Meeting Complete 2 Operational and Financial Review Complete Resolution No. 2003-230 N.C.S. Page 2 Mr. Mike Bierman September 30, 2003 Page Z 3 Public Gpinion Survey and 3 Workshops 4 City Council Workshop 5 Defirutian of Services and Standards 6 Preparation of RFP and Agreement 7 Proposers' Meeting and Clarification 8 Evaluation of Proposals 9 Selection of Contractor, Staff Report, and Evaluation. Report, and Presentation 10 Negotiation of Agreement 11 Engagement Management 12 Refuse Truck Street Impact Fee Study 13 Preparation of Public Notices 14 Council Approval of Stree"t Impact Fee 88 Reimbursable Expenses 95 Contingency Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Partially complete. ® Evaluated April 30, 2003 proposals submitted by Empire Waste Management and North Bay. • .Presented evaluation findings to you on June 5, 2003 ® Attended July 7, 2003 City Council meeting to hear proposers' presentations No activity No activity 95% complete Complete Complete Complete 100% complete No activity ($15,000 rema;n;ng in budget) Summary of Extra Work:Performed related to Reissuing the RFY' To respond to the City Council's. interest in 'consid'ering re-issuance of the RFP, I-IF&H provided.;technical assistance and' expert:advice to the City commencing after the July 7,.2003 City :.Council meeting (when proposers presented. 'their proposals) and concluding on September 15, 20.03 when Council directed staff to reissue the RFP. Specifically, we prepared for arid.. attended. two City Council meetings. On August.l8, 2003 "we made a presentation to the City Council outlining, their options, and on September 15, 2003 we attended the City Council .meeting to respond to questions about the procurement. process. In addition, we communicated, both verbally and in written form,. with City staff and private hauling companies regarding -the proposal ,process and reissuing the RFP. These services were not anticipated in our original scope of work. Staff time (approximately 73 hours) associated with these extra services: amounted to $12,800. Future Proiect Work To revise and reissue the RFP, evaluate future proposals, and select a new collection contractor; HF&H anticipates that we will assist the City by performing the tasks outlined below. Resolution No. 2003-230 N.C.S. Page 3 Mr. Mike Bierman September 30, 2003 Page 3 Reissue RFP and Provide RFP Clarification'(New Task 15) - Communicating :(written and verbal) with City staff and prospective proposers - .Meeting with proposers to discuss recycling plan considerations - Drafting thee-:Revised RFP (including Franchise Agreement) , - Finalizing the Revised` RFP based on City comments - Preparing for and attending a City Council meeting for approval of the RFP - Responding to proposers' questions Evaluate Proposals (Task 8) - Evaluating proposals to be received. in early 2004 in response to the reissued RFP (For the purposes of estimating the future evaluation cost, we anticipate receipt of three proposals.) - Arranging for and participating in site visits of proposers' facilities (anticipating visits would occur in a two-day period). Conducting Background Checks on,Proposers (New Task 17) - Obtaining acid reviewing. California Highway Patrol records - Identifying facility permitting violations occurring in the past 5 years at facilities that companies' propose to use. fo serve" Petaluma. (Our effort .anticipates contacting regulatory agencies -.and visiting agency offices to obtain copies of violation notices or other noncompliance documents assuming up to two days traveling to various permitting agencies in the counties of Sonoma, Alameda, Mann,. and Jqr San Francisco. - "' Reporting diversion level. in communities currently served ~ by proposing cornpanies based on Annual Reports to the CIWMB. (Our efforts do not - involve auditing or verification of diversion levels reported by companies as a of the franchise tonnage handled by such,parties) - S„n,,,,ari~ing thebackground check information in a letter report. Nofe that this task does not anticipate responding to comments provided by companies on our report. Furthermore, we anticipate that the City's attorney will take full responsibility for reviewing litigation history of the proposers and preparing a report on findings. Coordinating an Evaluation Subcommittee (New Task 18). Working with a City Council subcommittee. during the proposal evaluation and contractor selection process. This task shall include preparation for and attendance at two meetings with a CityCouncil subcommittee. Resolution No. 2003-230 N.C.S. " Page 4 Mr. Mike Bierman September 30, 2003 Page 4 ® Selecting Contractor ('.Task 9). Preparing for and attending a City Council meeting for contractor selection. Engagement 1Vlanagement (Task 11). Providing contir-ued engagement management services required. now that procurement process has been extended. Request for Bud' eg t Adjustment We estimate a budget of $125,705 for the future tasks described above (see Attachment 1). Accounting for remaining project funds, we request an adjustment of $59,919 .(as detailed on Attachment 2) to cover the anticipated cost to complete. The resulting adjustment will increase our existing project budget from $217,61°5 to $277,533. Attachment 3 presents a budget history that includes the adjustments discussed herein. If you have any questions, please contact Tracy Swanborn at (925) 977-6963 (tswanbornQhfh- consultants.com) or me at (925) 977=6952 (rhilton@hfh-consultants.com). ]f you approve of our request, please indicate your approval of the budget adjustments outlined herein by signing this letter and returning it to us. Sincerely,. HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON; LLC n Robert D. Hilton, CMC President Attachments cc: Kathleen Calton, HF&H Rick Skladzien,:City of Petaluma Tracy Swanborn, HF&H SIGNATURE BELOW INgDICpaTES APPROVAL R~' THE CITI' OF THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIBED HEREIN, WHICH RESULT IN A TOTAL PROTECT BUDGET OF $277,533 Signature: (Signature) Name: Title: Date: Resolution No. 2003-230 N.C.S. Page 5 Attachment 1 Petaluma Procurement Project Estimated Staff Fours and Fees to Complete Project Principal Snr. Mgr Snr. Assoc. Snr. Assoc. Associate Admin . Total Total Total Task Description (Hilton) (Schoen) (Swanborn) (Calton) (Simonson) Asst. Labor Labor Expenses $225 $170 $165 $155 $130 $70 Hotus Coss Cost Tasks 1 - 7: Complete Task 8: Evaluate. Proposals Received in Early 2004 . Review proposals 12 0 40 ~ 0 60 0 112 $17,100 $75 Analyze cost proposals 8 0 24 0 80 0 112 $16;160 $0. ~ Attend interviews 12 0 12 0 0 0 24 $4,680 $80 ~° Arrange for and particpate in site visits 16 0 18 0 0 8 42 $7,130 $160 o Prepare summary report $ 0 8 0 12 0 28 4 680 30 Total 56 0; 102 0 152 8 318 $49,750 $345 $50,095 z 0 N Task 9: Selection of Contractor 0 Prepare City Council report 10 0 16 0 4 8 38 $5,970 ~'", Prepare City Council presentation 8 .0 16 0 4 8 36 $5,520 ° z Attend City Council meeting ~ 6 0 6 0 0 0 12 2 340 c~ Total 24 0 38 0 8 16 86' $13;830 $17,0 $1'4,000 Task 10: Negotiation ofAgreement Attend two'meetings 8 0 8 0 0 0 T6 $3,120 Revise. franchise agreement 4 0 27 0 0 4 35 . 5 635 Total 12 0 35 0 0 4 51 $8,755 $245 $9,000 Task 11: Engagement Management Written verbal' communication with City 24 0 12 0 0 0 36 $7;380 Monitor project progress 4 0 8 0 0 0 12 2 220 Total 28 0 20 0 0 0 48 ' $9,600 $50 $9,650 Tasks 12 - 14: Complete ~o vc rn Attachment 1, Page 1 of 2 Attachment 1 Petaluma Procurement Project Estimated Staff ~-Iours and Fees to Complete Project Task Description Principal Snr. Mgr Snr. Assoc. Snr: Assoc. Associate Admin Total Total Total (Hilton) (Schoen) (Swanborn) (Calton) (Simonson) Asst. Labor Labor Expenses $225 $170 $165 $155 $130 $70 Hours Costs. Cost New Task 15: Reissue RFP and Provide RFP Clarification ' Meeting with proposers' 8 0 10 0 0 1 19 $3,520 Draft Revised RFP 4 0 if 0 0 4 24 $3;820 Finalize Revised RFP 1 - 0 8 - 0 0 4 13 $1 825 Draft Revised Agreement 1 0 12 0 0 4 17 , $2 485 Finalize Revised Agreement 1 0 8 0 0 4 13 , $1;825 .Respond to proposer questions 2 0 8 0 16 4 30 $4 130 ~: .Prepare for and attend Council mtg 2 ,0 . g 0 0 4 14 , 2 050 ~ Total 19 ~ 0 70 0 16 2S 130 $19,655 $270 $19;925- z 0 ~, Task 16: Task Not in Use 0 0 w cN New Task 17: Conduct Background Check on Proposers ° z Obtain and review CA Highway Patrol Report 1 0 2 0 0 12 15 $1,395 n Research permitting history 2 0 8 0 36 0 46 $6 450 ~' Document AB 939 diversion levels 0 0 2 0 0 12 14 , $1;170 Summarize findings 4 0 12 0 12 0 . 28 4440 Total 7 0 24 0 48 24 103 $13,455 $50 _ $13,505 New Task 18: Subcommittee Coordination Prepare for two meetings 4 0 8_ 0 0 0 12 $2;220 Attend two meetings 10 0 10 0 0 0 20 $3,900 Respond to questions 4 0 8 0 8 1 21 3 330 Total 18 0 26 0 8 1 53 $9,450 $80 $9,530 Project Total $124,495 $1,210 $125,705 ~d w ao ~ ,. Attachment 1, Page 2of 2 1 Initial Meetin 2 O erational and Financial Review 3 Public O inion Surve and Three Worksho s 4 Cit Council Worksho 5 Definition of Services, Standards, & Com ensati 6 Pre- aration of RFP. and A reement 0 7 Pro osers' Meetin and Pro -osal Clarification ~-' g~ 8 Evaluation of :Pro osals 0 9 Selection of Contractor, Staff Report, Evaluation N Re ort and Presentation based on 2003 Pro osal~ 0 ° 10 Ne otiation of Franchise A reement 0 11 En a ement Mana ement z 12 Refuse Truck Street Im act Fee Stud 13 Pre aration of Public Notices 14 .Council a royal of Streetlm -act Fee 15 Reissue RFP and Provide RFP Clarification 16 (Task Not in Use) 17 Conduct Back round Check on Pro osers 18 Subcommittee Coordination 88 Reimburseable. Ex enses 95 Contin enc Project Total `Reflects first, second and third contract amendments. b cra Attachment 2 Petaluma Procurement Project Status Report and Requested Adjustment Budget Status Project Budget Expenditures (as (as of 4/24/03)* of 9/15/03) $b. $116 $9,000- $9,355 $24,000 $23,647 $6;000 $8,886 i $1,000 $1,838 $26;280 $26,292 vailabl Estimated Cos Funds to Complete ($116) $0 ($355) $0 $353 $0 _ $12,725 $9,604_ $3,..121 $66,140 $37,491 $28,649 $14,000 $1,753 $12,247 $9,000 $0 $9.000 $7,494 $2,720 $0 $0 $2,431 $15,000 $217, 61.5 ~~ $13,.111 $7, 825 $7,494 $2,720 $0 $0 $0 $2,892 $0 $153,022 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 ($461) $15,000 $64,592 $0 $d $50;095 $14,000 $9;000 $o. $19,925 $0 $13,505 $9,530 $0 $0 $125,705 ustment $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0: 21,446 $1;753 $8,761 $0 $0 $o $1.9,925 $o $13,505 $9,530 $0 ($15,000) $59,919 P $9;000 $24,Q00 $6,000, $1.,000 $26,280 $12,725 $87,586 $15,753 $9;QQ0. $22,761 $7, 825 $7,494 .$2,720 $19,925- $0 $13,505 $9,530 $2,431 $0 277,533 00 Attachment 3 Petaluma. Procurement Project Budget History (HF Project No. S 3114) 12/17/01 11 /19/02 12/10/02 04/24/03 09/23/03 ask Descri tion Original Contract Bud et 1st Amendment Budget Adjustments Revised Budget 2nd Adjustment to Budget Revised Budget 3rd Adjustment to Budget Revised Budget 4th Adjustment Proposed Proposed Budget 1 Initial Meetin $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 O erational and Financial Review $9,000 $0 $9,000- $0 $9,000 $0 $9,000 $0 $9,000 3 Public O inion Surve and Three Worksho s $24,000 $0 $24,000 $0 $24,000 $0 $24,000 $0 $24;000 4 Cit Council Worksho $6,000 $0 $6,000 $0 $6;000 $0 $6;000 $o $6,000. 5 Definition of Services, Standards, & Com ensation $1;000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 6 Pre aration of RFP and A reement $24,000 $0 $24;000 $2,280 $26,280 $0 $26,280 $0 $26,280 7 .Pro osers' Meetin and:Pro osal Clarification $6,000 $0 $6,000 $0 $6,000 $6,725 $12,725. $0 $12,725 8 Evaluation.of Pro osals'Received $38,000 $0 $38;000 $0. $38,000 $28,140 $66,140 $21.,446 $87;586 o 9 Selection of Contractor; Staff Report, Evaluation Re ort and Presentation $14,000 $0 $14,000 $0 $i 4,000 $0 $14,000 $1,753 $15,753 10 Ne otiation of Franchise A Bement $9;000 $0 $9,000 $0 $9,000 $0 $9,000 ($0) $9;000 11 En a ementMana ement $14,000_ $0 $14,000 $0 $14,000 $0 $14,000 $8,761 $22,761 z 12 Refuse Truck Street IIII act Fee Stud $5,000 $2,825 $7,825 $0 $7;825 $0 $7,825 $0 $7,825 N 13 Pre aration of Public Notices $0 $7;494 $7,494 $0 $7,494 $0 $7,494 $0 .$7,494 °o 14 Council a royal of Street Im acG'Fee $0 $2,720 _$_2,720 $0 $2,720 $0 $2,720 ~ $0 $2,720 W N 15 Reissue REP and Provide RFP Clarification $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,925 $19,925 w ~ 16 Task Not in Use $o. Z 17 Conduct Back round Check on Pro osers $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0, $13;505 $13;505 ;n 19 Subcommittee Coordination. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,530 $9;530 88 Reimburseabl_e Ex enses $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,431 $2,431 $0 $2431- 95 Contin enc. $0 $2;280 $2;280 ($2,280) ~ $0 $15,000 $i 5,000 ($15,000) $0 Project Total $150,000 $15,319 $165;319 $0 $165,319 $52;296 $217,615 $59,919 $277,533 b w oc c~